Posted by Secular on January 12, 2013
On the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into child sexual abuse, announced yesterday — this article provides a bit of background and also has a link to the actual terms of reference.
The Conversation provides us with an explainer, and an analysis by the experts. You might find Judy Courtin’s comments of interest in particular. Some here will recall Glen Coulton’s article re the Ellis Defence in Online Opinion. If not, have a read . . . and despair.
While most advocacy groups have been praising the terms of reference one, the Care Leavers of Australia Network (CLAN) has criticised its limits, saying that the limit to sexual abuse only is a mistake in the light of all the other forms of institutional abuse towards children. This seems to be a fair comment, for two reasons. We need to consider that sexual abuse can be used in conjunction with other forms of abuse. Will the Commission be forced to silence victims wishing to put their experiences into context? Furthermore, if such other forms of abuse are not to be considered by this Commission, will those other victims ever have an opportunity to be heard?
Finally, this article posted today gives this Commission its meaning, in its description of the ‘hell house’, a boarding school run by the Salesian brothers between about 1960 and 1990.
Posted in Commentary child abuse | Tagged: Australian political party, Catholic Church, Melbourne Response, religion, Royal Commission, Secular Party of Australia | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Secular on January 1, 2013
by Moira Clarke
The draft legislation for the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill 2012 was released towards the end of the year, and was greeted with a good deal of ambivalence. This is not so surprising, since here is a ‘human rights’ bill that endeavours to place even further limitations on free speech, an ‘anti-discrimination’ bill which is a recipe book for how religious institutions can continue to discriminate, a piece of legislation that provides workplace protection for religious people but none whatsoever for those of no faith.
Link to article published in Online Opinion, 2 January 2013
© The Secular Party of Australia Inc., 2011. Unauthorised use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from the author and from the Secular Party of Australia is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to the author and to this blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Posted in External publications, Religious privilege | Tagged: abortion, anti-discrimination, Australian political party, blasphemy laws, Catholic Church, free speech, LGBTI, religion, Secular Party of Australia | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Secular on January 1, 2013
Happy New Year to all our followers, and welcome to 2013!!
And to kick things off, this poignant piece, “Reason’s greetings”, by the Outspoken Wookie Hilton T., tired of reading in the news of more and more “acts perpetrated because of religious hatred and intolerance”.
Posted in External publications | Tagged: India, LGBTI, Malala Yousafzai, Pakistan, religion, Secular, Swaziland, Westboro Baptist Church | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Secular on December 15, 2012
It didn’t take long.
Article praising a bunch of Catholics praising a Catholic spokesman for saying that, yes, all those cover-ups were not only ‘widespread in the church’ but that he was ‘personally scandalised and disillusioned’.
As whistleblower and NSW Detective Chief Inspector Peter Fox tweeted earlier today: ‘ Is “PRAISE” the right word when at the 11th Hr & about to be exposed they plea guilty’.
More contrition, more reform, more ‘healing’. We’ve heard it all before. And yes, this time it could be real, but so what? If it walks like a criminal organisation, and talks like a criminal organisation . . .
Posted in Commentary child abuse | Tagged: Australian political party, Catholic Church, Melbourne Response, Royal Commission, Secular Party of Australia, Towards Healing | 1 Comment »
Posted by Secular on December 13, 2012
A number of global secular organisations, including IHEU, the CFI have contributed to a ground-breaking report on the persecution of the non-religious.
We’re all aware that religious minorities around the world are always at risk in this respect. Less widely publicised is the situation regarding those of no faith, which is possibly much worse.
According to the CFI, ‘The report examines the laws and conditions in 60 different countries in which atheists, humanists, and skeptics are persecuted or discriminated against — in 2012 alone. Laws in these countries include restrictions on rights regarding citizenship, marriage, and access to education, as well as the criminalization of religious criticism, and even the mere expression of nonbelief. In many cases, the punishment for this kind of “crime” is death.’
Posted in Commentary secular | Tagged: Australian political party, blasphemy laws, Centre for Inquiry, CFI, Commentary secular, discrimination, free speech, IHEU, non-religious | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Secular on December 12, 2012
One of our Facebook followers alerted us to an article in the Washington Post, which describes how the ‘. . . decline of free speech has come not from any single blow but rather from thousands of paper cuts of well-intentioned exceptions designed to maintain social harmony.’ In particular, it cites a comment by Prime Minister Julia Gillard in her speech earlier this year before the United Nations: “Our tolerance must never extend to tolerating religious hatred.” The problem, there, is that we see a very broad interpretation of a once basic word, ‘hatred’.
This article is two months old, but is too valuable to ignore.
Posted in Commentary freedom of expression | Tagged: Australian political party, blasphemy laws, free speech, Secular Party of Australia | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Secular on December 10, 2012
Screening tomorrow evening, ‘. . . a truly extraordinary 20 year overview that reveals Australia’s shifting attitude to what was once an utterly taboo subject. . .’ This program will be examining the abuse and cover-ups in Australian churches, and presents new research linking child sexual abuse and suicide.
Posted in Commentary child abuse | Tagged: Australian political party, Catholic Church, Melbourne Response, religion, Royal Commission, Secular Party of Australia, Towards Healing | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Secular on December 9, 2012
Hopes dashed as UN talks in Qatar end with a weakened plan that will fail to address the rise in greenhouse gas emissions, and does not commit to giving any real assistance to poorer nations.
‘Kyoto would have expired at the end of 2012 without an extension. The nations pulling out – Russia, Japan and Canada – say it is meaningless to take on new targets when emerging nations have none. And Washington never ratified the pact.’
Posted in Commentary climate change | Tagged: Australian political party, Doha, Global Warming, Kyoto, Secular Party of Australia, United Nations | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Secular on December 7, 2012
Not 100% in line with our policies, but nevertheless an article offering some very interesting insights into the accountability of the funding arrangements with Catholic education authorities (or rather, lack thereof). Nicholas Reece finds that Catholic school funding is not based on need, with the elite schools getting the lion’s share, and as for attempts to make the system accountable: ‘. . . a recent review of these elite Catholic schools by former Productivity Commission economist and public education advocate Trevor Cobbold found the claims by the Catholic education authorities were “misleading and untrue”.’
Please also refer to our policy on education funding.
Posted in Commentary funding | Tagged: Australian political party, Catholic Church, Gonski, Secular Party of Australia | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Secular on December 7, 2012
7 December 2012
Media Release
After the decades long inexorable rise in global Islamism, we may be reaching a turning point. For the first time in a Muslim country, we are now seeing open and specifically secular opposition to an Islamist government. In Egypt, a “unified secular opposition” is voicing its opposition to the imposition of an Islamic constitution.
The stakes are high. Islamic constitutions effectively prohibit secularism and mandate sharia law. Inexplicably, this is just what the post-invasion constitutions of Iraq and Afghanistan have done. The inevitable result will be religious oppression, and social and economic disruption and stagnation.
The beliefs of all religions are contradicted by reason and evidence. The privileges granted to religions are thus not justified. In democracies we can say this. In Muslim countries it cannot be said. We should offer our support to those in Egypt fighting for this basic freedom.
John Perkins
President, Secular Party.
PO Box 6004, Melbourne 8008.
Tel 0411 143744
See News item:
http://www.smh.com.au/world/tanks-deploy-outside-egypt-presidential-palace-20121206-2axwt.html
© The Secular Party of Australia Inc., 2011. Unauthorised use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from the author and from the Secular Party of Australia is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to the author and to this blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Posted in Islam, Media Releases | Tagged: Australian political party, Egypt, Islam, religion, Secular Party of Australia | 1 Comment »
Royal Commission terms of reference
Posted by Secular on January 12, 2013
On the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into child sexual abuse, announced yesterday — this article provides a bit of background and also has a link to the actual terms of reference.
The Conversation provides us with an explainer, and an analysis by the experts. You might find Judy Courtin’s comments of interest in particular. Some here will recall Glen Coulton’s article re the Ellis Defence in Online Opinion. If not, have a read . . . and despair.
While most advocacy groups have been praising the terms of reference one, the Care Leavers of Australia Network (CLAN) has criticised its limits, saying that the limit to sexual abuse only is a mistake in the light of all the other forms of institutional abuse towards children. This seems to be a fair comment, for two reasons. We need to consider that sexual abuse can be used in conjunction with other forms of abuse. Will the Commission be forced to silence victims wishing to put their experiences into context? Furthermore, if such other forms of abuse are not to be considered by this Commission, will those other victims ever have an opportunity to be heard?
Finally, this article posted today gives this Commission its meaning, in its description of the ‘hell house’, a boarding school run by the Salesian brothers between about 1960 and 1990.
Posted in Commentary child abuse | Tagged: Australian political party, Catholic Church, Melbourne Response, religion, Royal Commission, Secular Party of Australia | Leave a Comment »