Waterboarding is Only the Beginning

Posted in Civics, Current Events, Politics with tags , , , , , , , , on May 9, 2009 by mikwonder

As more information continues to come out about the nature of the Bush administration’s “enhanced interrogation” program, there is a deadly serious set of realities that our country has to come to terms with.

Waterboarding, while you might argue isn’t all that bad, is legally torture.  Plain and simple, it’s illegal, and Bush Justice Department officials did a lousy job trying to argue that is was legal.  So we have an issue of legal accountability to deal with there, and it’s important because if our nation is not to look like it believes the law only needs to be followed when it’s convenient,  we have to enforce the law by punishing those who may have broken it.

On top of that, there is the issue of why torture was used in the first place.  There is the unsettling concern that intelligence officers were working over suspects in order to get them to “reveal” information tying Saddam Hussein to Al Qeida.  As the entire reason we went to war in Iraq in the first place has thus far turned out to be a crock, we need to know if there were instances of extreme actions taken (by anyone, for whatever reason) to make the desired picture come into focus.

Look, they waterboarded one guy almost 200 times in one month; that itself goes outside of the parameters set by Bush’s legal team.  What the hell did they need to do that for?

In any event, we need the whole story.  We need to know how much congress knew about this program when it began, what they didn’t know, and why they didn’t know.  We need a complete investigation of how it became official policy to use interrogation techniques that the U.S. has tried and executed people for doing.  The Geneva Accord is not some piddly-ass agreement that the American government can piss on.  There are a score of countries that are prepared to arrest Bush administration officials if they ever enter their countries on charges of committing WAR CRIMES.

You think they’re just doing that to be jerks?  Maybe they don’t like that their citizens can be picked up by the CIA and flown to a secret detention facility and held there without any legal recourse, while being waterboarded until they say something interesting.

Yes, that happened.  More than once.  You can come up with any rationale you like that to make that kind of thing seem necessary, but then you have to ask yourself, if you can’t know why they did that, how can you know it had to be done?

People have died because of the Bush administration’s heavy-handed response to 9/11.  Detainees that were alive when they went into a detention facility (like Abu Gharib) came out in a body bag.  There are pictures attesting to that.  It’s not a rumor, it’s not a left-wing anti-Bush conspiracy, it’s just been forgotten because Americans move through the news cycle too fast to let anything register as being important.

The CIA black-sites, the prisoner abuses, the torture and murder of people in our custody, these all really happened and have a real impact on what’s going on right now.  Those actions weren’t just allowed to happen, many of them were organized from the top.  The excuse has always been that they were trying to save American lives…

Well, tell that to the Iraqis that have been killed, displaced, and living in a warzone for almost seven years.  Same for the Afghanis, who are faring worse than when we arrived (and now Pakistan is spiraling downward).  More U.S. servicemen and women have died in Iraq than did in 9/11.  You know why people in this country have the audacity to say that we have the right to do whatever is required to protect American lives?

It’s easy when you aren’t the one dying.

We invaded a country, unprovoked, out of fear.  We’ve abused, humiliated, and murdered fellow human beings out of fear.  And then you wonder why there are people willing to kill Americans in the first place?

When 9/11 happened, it was a wake-up call to Americans, who were by and large unaware that people on the other side of the world had enough of a beef with us to murder innocents.  But instead of embracing the outside world, and showing compassion to combat their hatred, we responded with anger, fear, and vengeance.  Now, after eight years of President George Bush, we’ve become exactly the kind of nation Osama Bin Laden told us that we were.

We just don’t realize it, because we’re safe here at home.  Dick Cheney has been going around the news channels claiming that his torture policies kept America safe, and that halting them will only endanger our country of being attacked again.  Naturally, he’s stacked the deck in his favor; the policies he’s defending have guaranteed that someone will try and hit us again.

We are all responsible, because we are the ones who will pay the price for losing sight of who we are.  Americans don’t fucking torture.  We don’t need to, no matter how evil the enemy might be.  We can’t compromise our values, or the terrorists get what they want.  They want us to bleed ourselves dry overseas, they want global mayhem and distrust, because that’s when criminals thrive.

We need to admit that we were wrong, mop up the mess, punish those that broke the law, and fix the law so that we don’t allow ourselves to compromise our integrity out of fear again.  If we are as great of a nation as we think, then we ought to prove it to anyone who has any doubts.  We can’t, however, do it with violence, otherwise we will reap what we sow.  Those weak of mind resort to violence, and we’re better than that.

Think about it.

Ketchup? Really?

Posted in Uncategorized on May 8, 2009 by mikwonder

You probably already know this, but Laura Ingraham is a stupid twat.

She jumped onto the right-wing prejudice bandwagon over the President’s request to have a spicy mustard put onto his burger instead of ketchup.

I don’t mind making fun of the President and comparing his request to that “Do you have any Grey Poupon?” commercial, but only as a joke.  It’s not really elitist to request mustard, that whole elitist thing was an ironic advertising pitch anyway.  Sean Hannity did a version of that joke himself, which to his credit he has the right to do, but it’s obvious that his sub-text is suggesting that there is something wrong with wanting mustard on your burger.  It was a joke that Steven Colbert would do, but Sean actually means it, so he really is suggesting that mustard is the condiment of the aristocracy, or at the very least un-American…which is retarded.

Then Laura “Stupid-twat” Ingraham goes off on her show, and milks the thing as much as she can.  It’s pathetic that she can’t be sophisticated enough to make her snide comments and move onto something more important.  Fine, he likes mustard, but what does that even mean?

I don’t like ketchup on my burgers either.  Plenty of people don’t, which is why most restaurants let the customer do it themselves.  And spicy mustard, yeah, lots of people like that too (including me).  Am I not American?  Is it wrong to not fit into this “ketchup goes on everything” mentality?

Fuck you, Laura.  I could make the claim that ketchup is for trailer-trash and kids under twelve, but that would be an inappropriate statement as well.  It’s out there now, though, so I can’t take it back.

GROW UP, you assholes.  Condiments aren’t the judge of someone’s character, we’re not all supposed to like all he same shit otherwise we’d be boring.  Put whatever the fuck you want on your burgers, and quit wasting our time by padding the narrow-minded prejudice of very stupid people who think America runs on ketchup and Jesus.

My Thoughts on Ron Paul

Posted in Civics, Economy, Politics with tags , , on May 6, 2009 by mikwonder

I went to on of the Tea Party protests that happened last month (funny how no one is talking about those anymore…hmm), and I ran into some of the anti-Federal Reserve folks that are coalescing into a new kind of socially liberal, fiscally conservative political movement.

Their hero is Ron Paul, the Republican outcast that is now apparently looking much more attractive given that the Republicans themselves are a bloody mess.  I welcome new ideas being brought to the table, so I’m curious how successful Ron Paul might be at creating a “post-neo-conservative” movement.

It remains to be seen if that will even happen, but I have to draw attention to some of the ideas that Ron Paul conservatives bring.  I’m totally with you on the abandonment of right-wing attempts to define our nation’s morality by outlawing anything that they find offensive (and keeping things they like as legal as possible…like beating up gays).  I’m interested in the idea of breaking open the Federal Reserve and exposing all the dirty secrets going on in there.  Hell, if it’s so bad as to deserve burning the thing down, pass me a torch.  However, I’m not comfortable retiring an entire bureaucratic entity until all the facts are known.  So I’ll have to get back to you on that.

But then there is all this crap I hear about abolishing the IRS and creating a flat tax rate for everyone, and a whole bunch of other Libertarian talking points.  I understand keeping our deficits low, I get having a balanced budget, I agree that we shouldn’t have an aggressive democracy-evangelizing foreign policy that involves bombing children; what I don’t understand is why so many people hang onto the tired “free-market means free people” bullshit.

I have an idea about that, it’s probably because that’s what our culture is brought up with (as we charge everything to our credit cards), but we need to snap out of it.  I think many of us conceptualize capitalism in a very perverted way.  The “invisible hand” of the market that balances everything out, and the association of “free markets” with personal freedom, ugh…these things have been turned into zombie mantras calling for unregulated markets and low tax rates for everyone (but especially for the rich).

Look, capitalism is not about you making yourself rich, it’s about using your money to make more money.  If you take a piece of wood, chisel it into a chair, then sell it, you are not a capitalist.  You’d be a worker, turning your labor into value that can be used to do something else.  Most of us do this.  The system of economic exchange that we all engage in has an ebb and flow to it, indeed, but it is NOT self-regulating.  It has feedback cycles, where one area changes due to the effects of another area, but this is an emergent property of any system that seeks equilibrium.

It’s complicated, and no one actually understands all of it (it they say they do they’re LYING), but it’s a balancing act that we create mathematical formulas to model and then try to make predictions with.

How about something a little more tangible?  Take, for example, a bucket of gasoline: it’s fairly content just sitting there as a liquid, but the minute a flame is introduced, the chemicals re-balance themselves into a gaseous mixture.  The “invisible hand” of chemistry guides all of this, and no matter is destroyed or lost, but rather turned into something else.  Sure, the system is in balance, but you’re more concerned about your third degree burns.

The economy works the same way.  It’s a dynamic system made up of people, and it will carry on no matter who gets what, or in what quantity, or if people get fired or thrown out of their houses.  All of that talk of efficiency and comparative advantage, that’s all just math.  In reality, we’re dealing with actual people.  People with families and futures that depend upon us playing by a set of reasonable rules.  Well, we have to have rules in order for it to work without tossing people out into the streets, and that means government involvement.  You really think people (meaning humans) are going to always make rational choices based on a meta-analysis of the entire economy?  No, they’re going to take their money and run.

I agree with Libertarians that too much red tape is bad.  But surely you can see that unregulated markets will invariably lead to people exploiting every opportunity to make the most money possible, no matter the social cost.  The goal is balance, and I hope we all can understand this.  Because if you Libertarians out there want people to listen to your ideas, you need to address the inherent drawbacks that “freedom” brings.  It’s not as simple as Ron Paul makes it sound, otherwise, why would we still be arguing about this?

As different as the world might seem today, none of mankind’s problems have gone away.  Every solution we come up with brings a new set of issues.  Like the atoms in your gasoline, nothing is gone forever, it’s just in a different form.

Ron Paul might have better suggestions than the rest of the GOP, but I guarantee he doesn’t have all the answers.

Coming From a Non-Believer: Thank God for Obama

Posted in Civics, Current Events, Media, Politics, Rantings & Ravings on April 30, 2009 by mikwonder

Seriously, we have such a great improvement over our last President that I can’t even begin to describe the relief I have for voting for Barack Obama along with a majority of Americans last November.

He knows what he’s talking about.  He isn’t an idiot, and he’s not naive about the difficulties we face.  So I’m not worried about him.

The trick is going to be convincing Americans that this is the case and to have trust in his leadership ability.

Oh wait…they do.  It appears that an overwhelming majority of the public supports the President and more people feel the country is on the right track than on the wrong one.  Well, I guess he did bring hope after all, didn’t he?

Not that this will convince the nay-sayers.  You know, I’m okay with that.  People need to question the President and offer differing viewpoints.  But there’s a real big difference in offering a counterpoint and being obstructionist.

That’s what the Republican party is doing.  Anything Obama does, sucks.  They will oppose the same things they supported a few months ago, back when they had more representation and the Presidency.  They’ll invent arguments, trump up as much feigned outrage as possible, and push all the same hot-button buttons with the hope that  people will then think less of our President.

It’s borderline treasonous, if you ask me, but I believe in free speech.  That doesn’t mean that the talking heads are right, though.  You think that FOX might be considered the “right-leaning” network for a reason?  That’s their market.  You’re being fed edited sound bites and bullshit analysis, people, let’s try to think a little independently here.  Oh, right, the rest of the media is all left-wing bias.  So everyone has an agenda.

Ok, here’s the solution: don’t just watch Sean Hannity’s take on the President’s press conference, watch it yourself.  It’s all out there, for your consideration.  Listen to what actually comes out of Obama’s mouth, and think about what he’s saying after hearing it, not before.

I hear conservatives complain about Obama being a liar and yet refusing to even watch his speeches, and that just pisses me off.

Fine, if you can’t do the actual research yourself, then don’t.  It’s your right.  However, that means you don’t get to offer your opinion.

Period.

If you don’t know what he actually said (or the actual details of something you feel the desire to chime in about), then how can you possible know what you are talking about?  If you just repeat other people’s clearly established anti-Obama attitude, you’re going to sound like an ignorant jackass and I will call you out on it.  You hearing this, right-wing ditto-heads?  I spend a lot of time reading and researching before running my mouth, so either do the legwork, or just quietly drink your glass of shut-the-fuck-up.

Ask questions, have your reservations and concerns, but keep your bigotry and close-mindedness to yourself.  It’s irritating at best, counterproductive at worst.

Barrack Obama is our President, and he’s on the bitch.  He knows SO, so much more than you do, so quit talking like you could do a better job.

Part of the Reason I Dropped Out in the First Place

Posted in Rantings & Ravings with tags , on April 27, 2009 by mikwonder

Ok, so I emailed someone in the Political Science department about the degree requirements since I’m thinking about going back to school and finishing my last year.

I asked in the message, “Do the 8 credits of ECON classes that are required to be taken count towards the 36 total credit hours that must be taken for the major?”

This is what I got back:

You need 36 credits of courses with the PSCI designation.  The ECON courses do not count, as they do start with ECON.
cheers,
Kristina

Ok…so, the reason that I actually have to take 8 more credit hours than the required “36″ is because of some clerical technicality?  You HAVE TO take courses with the proper letter designation, it’s just university policy?  Anything not having a “PSCI” designation must not have anything to do with political science, then…but wait, those ECON classes are required for the major.  Is that perhapes because an understanding of economics might be good to have in a political context?

Of course it is, that’s the reason it’s required!  Those goddamn letters are meaningless to anyone outside the university, why not just say that you have to take 44 hours minimum if you have to take those goddamn ECON classes anyway???

That kind of administrative bullshit is just irritating, but the very LEAST you can do is not talk to me like I’m an idiot.  I know the difference between “PSCI” and “ECON” you silly twat!  I just want to know what I need to fucking graduate!

Jesus, college is so goddamn overrated it makes my head spin.

Stranger, and Scarier Than Fiction

Posted in Civics, Current Events, Journalism, Military Affairs, Politics with tags , , , , , , , on April 23, 2009 by mikwonder

Someone tell me if I’m just allowing the media to create a dastardly plot out of little bits and pieces of fact.

Here’s the crazy conspiracy that is starting to emerge out of the whole torture issue from the Bush days:

The “enhanced interrogation” program was started soon after 9/11 and around the lead up to the invasion of Iraq.  The CIA and the Pentagon both got the same orders on how to proceed with interrogating suspects, and the Justice Department wrote legal opinions about how to interpret the law in a way that would make these “enhanced” techniques to be legal (aka. technically not torture, which is unequivocally illegal under both U.S. and international law).

This info is now a matter of public record, with documents being declassified by the Obama administration and a new Armed Services Committee report on the military’s interrogation programs.  Both are the same in their direction, and so they came from the one place that would have the authority to make these policy choices: the White House.  Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney and even Bush not only knew about it, but actively orchestrated this new, slightly different, definition of what constituted torture, with the Department of Justice providing them the legal firewall to protect them from any pesky investigations or lawsuits that might interfere with the “War on Terror.”

We know that this all happened, and only certain bits and pieces lack complete proof (meaning documentation, video, semen samples).  We also know that the politicization of the Justice Department was occurring, and that the administration was blocking congressional oversight committees from being able to do anything about this issue.  For instance, Nancy Pelosi recently revealed that while on the House Judiciary Committee, she was legally unable to voice concerns about the interrogation program because it was still classified information; at that time, they were told that these advanced techniques were NOT being used, which was a lie, and she could not even talk to her staff about it without being charged with violating national security.

This all points to pretty heavy overreach by the Executive Branch…but now the rabbit hole goes even deeper.

Here’s the new wrinkle: Apparently military interrogation trainers were contacted by the administration and asked specifically about techniques that were used while training our military personnel to resist enemy interrogation attempts should they ever be captured.  These trainers would provide simulated interrogation scenarios, which include waterboarding, since these are techniques commonly used by foreign captors to force Americans into confessing to crimes they did not commit, which would then be used as propaganda.  It’s happened in Vietnam, Kosovo, and even in Iraq.

Why would the military be asked about techniques that were often used to coerce people into false confessions, and then start using those exact techniques on actual detainees, all under the guise of securing life-saving intelligence?  If it’s already conventional wisdom that these borderline torturous techniques often yielded bad intelligence, why would they make those techniques standard?

The new murmur is that this “bad intelligence” was actually the point.  At the same time American intelligence guys started torturing captured terrorists, and alleged terrorists, the administration was looking for the justifications to go to war in Iraq.  When the search for WMD’s didn’t pan out, the gears shifted to finding links between Saddam’s regime and Al Qieda.  That meant finding those links by any means necessary, and waterboarding a guy almost 200 times is enough to get him to say whatever the hell you want.

Right now there is not enough declassified material that demonstrates what exactly was gained from using interrogation methods that are now officially considered torture by the current administration.  Did they help foil any actual plots?  But more importantly, did any detainees reveal a link between Saddam Hussein and terrorist organizations after being subjected to these methods?

This is what it all boils down to: It may be that the Bush administration politicized the Justice Department (which is against the law), then bent existing laws against torture (an action that made many officials nervous) in order to give our intelligence operatives permission to force out confessions, and essentially fabricate intelligence that could then be used to justify the war in Iraq.

Did you catch all of that?  Here’s the gist once more: Let’s legalize torture in order to package and sell the war in Iraq.

I don’t know yet that this is the complete and utter truth, because it sounds almost too conspiratorial to be taken seriously.  But I didn’t make any of this up, and there is now enough evidence to make the Attorney General consider putting a special investigator on the case.  The lead up to the war in Iraq was a total con by the Bush administration, and I believe that after pouring over the mountain of work done by journalists.  Now, however, there may be a direct link between prewar intelligence and Bush’s torture program.

That means actual War Crimes committed by the former administration: The intent to begin a war on false pretenses with direct evidence of falsified intelligence, and culpability may lead right to the office of the President himself. If our nation is to ever regain its moral authority, we have to find out the complete truth behind this no matter how ugly it turns out to be.  It was the same story in Vietnam, and it was allowed to happen in Iraq.  We need to fix our system once and for all, otherwise it will happen again.

The Gathering Storm

Posted in Current Events, Politics on April 20, 2009 by mikwonder

Yikes.  It looks like things are heating up with the whole Bush-era torture scandal.

You know, I would have expected this sudden mainstream discussion of retribution for war crimes to make me happy.  But it’s not happening in a very pleasant fashion.

It looks like the President is taking a beating for not calling on prosecutions to begin moving forward.  Calls are being made to impeach Jay Bybee, a current Federal Judge, for authoring memos instructing the CIA how to torture without it technically being torture.  And the news keeps getting worse on just how badly detainees were treated.

Honestly, this is just the tip of the iceberg.  The Bush administration broke so many laws that a true attempt at accountability might not be wrapped up until the next Presidential election.  I really don’t know how to feel about all this, since President Obama is trying to stay cool about all this.

Why?

What is he planning?  I hope it’s something sensible, because we can’t just ignore this stuff anymore.  Liberals have been calling for war crimes charges to be leveled for quite some time, and now there’s too much evidence not to.  I mean, for crying out loud, Obama released the goddamn memos!  You can read them for yourself! How can we ignore this?

I don’t see any reason to protect Bush or Cheney or any of them.  This isn’t politics, it’s justice.  The only issue that I can see potentially putting Obama in a bind is that a thourough review of Bush tactics and Executive overreach could end up robbing the President of some of his powers.  Not that this is a bad thing, seeing the abuse that we just experienced, but might Congress overreact or start a Constitutional crisis?

I have no idea.  We’ll have to wait and see if our President has any reason to wait much longer before letting the dogs loose on Bush’s legacy.  I say, whatever the potential downside, history must be presented the truth.  No matter how ugly.  If that means that the former President will have to be hauled in front of a Senate commiteee, so be it.  It’s just something Americans are going to have to go through.

Now that I think about it, I’ve changed my mind.  I’d love to see Bush caught in the headlights one last time.  It would be the perfect ending to his memoirs.

Church and State

Posted in Civics, Current Events, Human Rights, Religion on April 18, 2009 by mikwonder

Steven Colbert had a great interview last week that highlighted the real issue at play in our country’s fixation with “gay marriage”.

We have a seperation between church and state, and marriage as a “sacred” institution should not be something our government is charged with protecting.  The state manages legal contracts and obligations to those contracts, period.  Whether or not your God recognizes the union is totally beside the point.

Get religion out of our government, and the problem is solved.  Any two people who want to enter into a legal contract should be able to do so, even if it’s two people of the same gender.  Leave it to the churches to decide whether or not to wed homosexuals.  I don’t care if the Catholic church doesn’t like gays, I don’t care about anything else they say.  So leave your religion out of people’s lives.

The marriage argument is being hijacked by overbearingly religious people who want to foist their views of morality on other people.  I’m sorry, but this country was founded on the idea that we wouldn’t have to put up with that.  I don’t subscribe to Christianity, and that’s the same story for most of the people on the globe.  So don’t use the state to legally obligate me or anyone else to live in a way that fits more comfortably within your views.  I won’t tell your church what to think, as long as you don’t use the state to tell me how I should think.

That goes for evolution and science education, sex education, abortion rights, and anything else that Christians claim to have all the “right” answers to.  Unless you have a better answer than “God wants it to be that way” I’m not interested.  The law is not there for you to use as a devise to bully people into your line of thinking.  You can believe whatever you want, and you can even promote your views with the goal of winning people over (freedom of speech, dog), but you better not try to outlaw ideas that you don’t like.

That kind of thing just pisses people off, and angry people don’t put up with that kind of crap for too long.  Religious activists are risking a backlash against their views, one that will challenge the right to exercise your faith freely.  Don’t push it, people; Big Brother could be used to do the very same thing you’re trying to do against the non-believers.  Imagine for a moment a law that says you can’t teach certain things in your church, or that forces certain policies to be adopted by the clergy.  Don’t like that idea?  Then quit using the legal system to screw with other people’s lives.

You’ve officially been warned.

Okay, Now They’re Just Going Nuts

Posted in Current Events, Humor, Journalism, Media, Politics, Rantings & Ravings on April 11, 2009 by mikwonder

Jesus ever-loving Christ, what is right-wing America trying to do?

These “Tea-bagging Party” protests that are supposed to be going on…I don’t have a problem with them.  If you want to organize a protest, even if I disagree with whatever you’re complaining about, please do so at your leisure.  All I ask is that you don’t screw up traffic or start getting unruly and violent.

Fine.

But what I don’t think is so great is seeing right-wing media ASSISTING these protests.  It’s bad enough that Fox News is stumping for the anti-Obama viewer and entrenching already established opinions.  I’m not at all against these guys being critical of our President, but it’s not criticism to take quotes out of context, make up only marginally sensible claims, and maybe throw in the occasional fake statistic or outright falsehood.

Like how Sean “D-Bag” Hannitys trying to make President Obama out to be anti-American; while in Europe, Obama made a comment about Americans being dismissive of Europe and used the word “arrogance”.  Here’s the line:

In America there’s a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the worldInstead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you, there have been times America’s shown arrogance, been dismissive, even derisive.”

Hannity and the rest of the right-wing madhouse then start accusing our President of hating America or at least pandering to Europeans.  Okay, seems a little pander-y, maybe.  But then Obama continued with this::

“…But in Europe there is an anti-Americanism that is at once casual and insidious. Instead of recognizing the good that America does in the world, [some Europeans have chosen] to blame America for much of what is bad.”

Wait, so our President admitted that Americans can be arrogant while also chastising Europeans for being dicks, too?  What a reasonable thing to do!  But since Fox News caters to conservatives, this information is tweaked ever so cleverly so that the attitude of “America Can Do No Wrong” continues to be trumpeted.

That’s the difference in how liberals view the country as opposed to conservatives: we love our country like adults love each other.  Of course our goddamn country can to wrong, it’s not an actual “thing” with a mind of its own, it’s a collection of hundreds of millions of people!  People are stupid a lot of the time.  So as the people manning the levers of our democracy screw up, so does the “country’.  What’s wrong with a little humility…and some rational thought?

I swear, it’s like talking to fucking children!  Obnoxious pre-teens, especially.  They think they know everything and so they form their opinions based on their tiny bit of exposure to actual life.  That’s why they do stupid things, and why they need to go to class and learn facts.  Oh, and parenting helps.

People who watch (and believe) Fox News are being fed only the facts that right-wing ideologues want them to have, and not always real ones.  Seriously, they lie and mischaracterize and they are very good at being coy about it.  This accomplishes two things: first, they are indoctrinating their flock of sheep, and two, they are dividing the efforts of the rest of the media by forcing them to report actual facts and also debunk all of Fox News’ bullshit.  It’s easy to make crap up; it takes work to get to the actual truth.

That’s why conservatives are either dim-witted or egotistical.  The either lack the ability to question their own beliefs or they don’t know enough to realize they should.  A special brand of civil ignorance has been plaguing our country for a while now, and the voices that are supposed to be giving us the necessary information are telling two different stories.  At this point they aren’t even writing in the same book.  While so-called “liberal” media outlets are attempting to write non-fiction, the right-wing is churning out the next “Left Behind” novel (SPOILER: Obama is the anti-christ).

The fact that they are not only reporting on anti-government protests but also actively trying to get people involved is a complete violation of Fox News’ “fair and balanced” mantra.  But you know how they excuse it?  Niel Cuvato says that it’s because the liberal media only covers protests that advocate for “bigger government” and ignore opposing views.  Okay, that’s obviously bullshit, because how would we have heard about these protests in the first place if other outlets weren’t covering them somewhat?  I, like most of the country, don’t actually watch Fox News.  I only hear about their stupid shit and have to check it out myself to see if anyone could be that stupid.  I’m rarely surprised, though occasionally made slightly ill.

The issue is not what you’re covering, it’s how; if your network is actively promoting conspiracy theories about Democrats seizing the government and plotting to take away everyone’s guns (and calling such nonsense news), it’s even more insidious to be recruiting or encouraging people to actively work against our democratically elected government in response to these delusions.  Instead of just informing the public about privately organized events, they are actively promoting, financing, and organizing these events and therefore are CREATING public opinion, not reporting on it.

This is manipulative to the point of being fucking scary.  I’d expect this to be a South Park plot where Eric Cartmen gets a hold of Fox News and attempts to start a Fourth Reich, or something.  These guys at Fox are creating a totally separate, scarier, and less factual reality, and now they want people to start distrusting the government and hording ammunition?  It’s as if conservatives are so pissed that they lost so bad in the last election that now they’re ready to take the power back with violence, or maybe just the threat of it.

Now I’m becoming a conspiracy theorist…but what explains this completely insane behavior?  Someone is pulling strings behind the scene, and my guess is that it’s the wealthy corporatocricy that the Republican party has come to represent.  These guys own virtually everything, and since they’ve fucked things up so bad they’re scared that Obama will lead a populist movement to take all that money back and pay for better heath care.  I’ll tell you, right now must be a rough time to be rich, never mind being poor (which always sucks).

I just hope this insanity doesn’t get pushed too far, because if the right-wing is allowed to bring its veiwers’ fear to fever pitch, they just might get the kind of disaster they’re waiting for.  Oh yes, they want something bad to happen, because they can then blame it all on Obama…and that would legitimize their next grab for power.  Why else would Dick Cheney suddenly become all press-friendly just to accuse Obama of making us unsafe?  He wants to be able to say, “I told you so.”  If things were to get especially bad, they might not even bother with elections, since elections would run them the risk of losing.  Again.  This is a party unconcerned about their actual constituents, they only care about themselves and their wealthy benefactors.

Don’t think for one minute that this isn’t real, or that such a dark future isn’t a real possibility.  It’s happened too many times before to ignore the signs.  If our populace is as undereducated as most statistics would indicate, history is especially bound to repeat itself.  Unfortunately, conservatives are so blinded by their sense of American exceptionalism that they wouldn’t even see it coming.

Under those circumstances, I don’t plan on sticking around long enough to say, “I told you so.”  Part of being in an adult relationship is knowing when to get out.  It shouldn’t be hard to find a safe, out-of the-way spot somewhere on the globe…most Americans wouldn’t know how to use one anyway.

Semper Fudge.

Republicans Aren’t Even Trying

Posted in Current Events, Politics on April 4, 2009 by mikwonder

Come on, you guys.  Is that all you have?  The party of “fiscal responsibility” has pulled more nonsense out of its ass and is trying to claim that the United States can freeze all government spending in order to pay for the most outrageous tax-cuts to the rich ever.

I know that these guys are in an almost laughably ineffectual minority position in government, but this is just pathetic. I would be legitimately concerned if the GOP was trying to pass this disastrous plan for America’s spending plans, but since actual rational adults are now in charge of the government we are safe knowing these lunatics are just blowing hot air up the proverbial asses of the conservative base.  And that base is being largely ignored.

That’s all well and good, but it amazes me how deranged Republicans are.  It’s like they are waking up from a really good dream where every American was happy and prosperous while also being paid virtually nothing, while the military goes hopping around the globe blowing up “evil-doers” and the governement has turned over its responsibilites to private companies that always act in the best interest of everyone without any kind of oversight.

After waking from that delusion, they are trying desperately to get people to go back to sleep.

It’s over, folks.  The “Permanent Republican Majority” was a wash.  The ideology is bankrupt, and so the draconian attempt to consolidate power and return American to a plutocracy ruled by the rich has been rejected as a good idea.  I really wish they would stop trying to sell their crappy wares.  We aren’t gonna buy it, we can see that your budget proposal is just a piece of self-serving propaganda.  Seriously, it’s like cleaning up an old Yugo and trying to sell it as a Mercedes.  We can see that it’s a pile of shit, dude.

I don’t get it.  Maybe there’s some larger strategy in there somewhere.  But if this is the best the party of “no” can do, I can’t see any hope for them to return to a place of political relevance.  That’s a good thing for a America, since their ideas are crap.  I just worry that Republicans, being the slick opportunists and hypocrites that they are, will get an opportunity to exploit some event (a disaster or scandal, or something) by spinning their web of lies cleverly enough to regain some seats at the table.

Only time will tell.  But for now I’m going to just sit back and enjoy having the Republicans taken as seriously as they ought to be.

Karma is a bitch, ain’t it?