FIRST DRAFT

Hagel Nagila

Nagila means rejoice in Hebrew but the neo-cons and Vulcans are not rejoicing over Chuck Hagel's being nominated as Secretary of Defense. They dislike the former Nebraska Senator because he dislikes war and isn't a slavish worshipper of Bibi Netanyahu and his war-mongering right wing Israeli government. As far as I'm concerned those are excellent reasons to support the Hagel nomination: if Kristol and Bolton hate it, I like it. 

On a more serious note, I like the nomination because the former enlisted man appears ready to go to the Pentagon and start cutting the budget, which is imperative after the explosion in military spending during the Bush years. Our Republican friends hate wasteful guvmint and bureaucracy unless it wears camouflage, which makes Hagel a heretic in their eyes. As a bonus, Senator Walnuts and his ventriloquist dummy, Little Lindsey, oppose the nomination, which, yet again, floats my boat.

It's a sad commentary that placing our national security interests above that of the current Likud dominated Israeli government is controversial in some circles. Bibi makes Menachem Begin and even Ariel Sharon look like fucking hippies, after all. The days of Ben Gurion, Meir, Peres, and Rabin are long gone, so while I support Israel's right to exist, I don't support its settlement policy or rush to war with Iran. Netanyahu is like a dog that shits on the rug, the neo-cons applaud his defecatory audacity while I think his nose should be rubbed in it. I'm not sure that Obama would go that far but he might lightly whap Bibi's nose with a rolled up newspaper or something...

An unlikely supporter of the Hagel selection is one of Obama's fiercest critics on the left, the Guardian's Glenn Greenwald who does an excellent job of putting Hagel's 1998 comments about James Hormel in context:

So yes: like virtually every prominent politician in both parties, Chuck Hagel had primitive and ugly views on gay issues back in 1998. But shouldn't the question be: does he still hold these views or, like huge numbers of Americans, have his viewed evolved since then? Hagel has apologized for what he said, an apology which Hormel accepted, graciously noting: "I can't remember a time when a potential presidential nominee apologized for anything . . . .Since 1998, fourteen years have passed, and public attitudes have shifted--perhaps Senator Hagel has progressed with the times, too." Moreover, Hagel last week also vowed that he is "fully supportive of 'open service' and committed to LGBT military families."

The openly gay foreign policy insider, Steve Clemons, has known Hagel for years, and two weeks ago wrote in the Atlantic that "Chuck Hagel is pro-gay, pro-LGBT, pro-ending 'don't ask, don't tell.'" Beyond his policy views, Clemons recounted personal incident after personal incident that completely negates the accusation that Hagel now harbors bigotry toward gay people.

I'm not sure that the Hagel nomination has me ready to dance in the streets to Hava Nagila, but I don't mind when the President picks a fight with Senate Republicans; especially one he can win. 

It's Always Time to Talk About Shit That Doesn't Matter

I keep going back to this, from the brilliant Cleolinda: 

(Here's my thought on that in a nutshell: Violent movies and videogames do not make people violent. Violent people are attracted to violent media. Of course, so are many of the rest of us, just for different reasons. I ended up watching The Matrix about 46,000 times--at one point on a three-day loop--for the book, and I shot nobody. If you want to talk about warning signs, don't look at the kid's taste in movies or his literary output--look at those two things in the context of his real-life behavior, which was already disturbing his teachers and classmates. Stephen King? A folksy, personable guy in real life. Quentin Tarantino? Full of energy and enthusiasm. Consequently, no one expects them to go on shooting rampages. The bitter, stalkative kid who won't even speak when spoken to, who also writes about bloody murder sprees? For God's sake, keep an eye on him.) 

I would never say we don't need to have a less nihilistic, brutal, violent culture. But we can start working on that by refraining from blowing up so many fucking kids in the world and starving them of food and care here at home. Once we are done with that I will listen to you about shooting hookers in GTA or whatever the hell we think is the problem right now. Once we are done making sure everyone can EAT, we can get on to what disaffected suburban brats are reading these days. 

Once we're done with this: 

The police came quickly and carried my son screaming and kicking into the bowels of the hospital. I started to shake, and tears filled my eyes as I filled out the paperwork—“Were there any difficulties with....at what age did your child....were there any problems with...has your child ever experienced...does your child have....”  

At least we have health insurance now. I recently accepted a position with a local college, giving up my freelance career because when you have a kid like this, you need benefits. You’ll do anything for benefits. No individual insurance plan will cover this kind of thing.

No individual insurance plan, and until the laughably toothless health care reform passed last year which has been called a staggering overreach of government power, few insurance plans AT ALL. The kinds of intensive therapies children need, even with Cadillac insurance, can bankrupt middle class families. Can bankrupt relatively wealthy families. Can, even if there is money to pay for them and doctors to provide them, can quite simply drag a family under with the grinding, every day process of staying level enough with the horizon to buy groceries and go to school. 

It is one of the grand ironies of what little mental health assistance exists that when you need it most, that is when you are usually so far beyond the beyond that accessing it seems like going to the moon. 

But getting back to Cleolinda's wise words up there, what we're not doing very well right now is creating a nonviolent world for any of us. (I almost wrote "our kids," as if adults have no need of peace and decency.) That violence is not, primarily, on screens or in "the media" or anywhere imaginary, but imaginary violence is all we can seem to bring ourselves to talk about when things like this happen. 

It's all we can bring ourselves to try to address, because real violence, real agents of violence, are political, and controversial, and emotional and upsetting and they're going to make dinner conversation awkward and difficult. Everybody agrees that shooting fictional aliens is probably not the most productive use of anyone's time. Almost nobody agrees on the correct number of children that have to be killed in drone strikes so as to properly elevate our national dick, or how much money we spend turning schools into prisons instead of the other way fucking round. 

It's like there's a list somewhere, of Things We Can Address, and it's all stuff like why so many kids have ADHD, and how parents aren't hugging their children enough, and where precisely in the schoolyard we should stick the plaque proclaiming GOD IS LOVE because that'll fix everything. It's how many teachers need to be armed, and how many cops need to be at every entrance, and the opinion that perhaps we need fewer cops in schools and OH SHIT RIGHT FEWER HOLES IN THE SCHOOLS' ROOFS WHILE WE'RE AT IT never quite makes it through the World of Warcraft soundtrack blaring on every goddamned Sunday show.

(See, already there you go, asking why I have to put it just that way. Can't I use nicer language?)

We have limited ourselves to addressing matters that don't need addressing, so as to drown out the screaming of the things that do. 

A. 

In Which Conrad Black Calls Rupert Murdoch a Psychopath, or, the Skank Calls the Whore a Slut

Conrad comes slithering out of his hole to opine that this Rupert Murdoch chap is a bit of a douche: 

When the extent of his skullduggery finally oozed out, sluggish and filthy, including the details of the British government's dotage on him, this summer, Murdoch's old possum routine didn't play as convincingly as it had in its many previous auditions, when he purported to be contrite over the shortcomings of errant employees. Bumbling into a parliamentary hearing in London, supported on each arm like a centenarian semi-cadaver, mumbling about humility, trying to represent News Corporation's board as independent when it is public corporate America's most docile board of directors and is composed entirely of hacks, retainers, and ex-employees; scrambling and whimpering and paying millions to victims of his outrages; putting his name on a Journal op-ed piece about education; it's all of a piece and none of it resonates anymore. In bygone days, he somehow carried off sprawling in a black costume on a bed in a glossy magazine and ruminating about being an "ambassador to Joe Six Pack," a champion of the little guy, and a spiritual person contemplating the consolations of Catholicism. At its most imaginative, it was a passably imaginative imposture.

My admiration for his boldness and acumen and our previous 25 years of more than civil relations make it unpleasant, despite his unspeakable assault on me, to have to conclude that he is, in my personal belief, a psychopath.

YOU WOULD KNOW YOU DESPICABLE MOTHERFUCKER.

(BTW, I would yell about HuffPo giving a platform to one of the greatest assholes of our time, but the Sun-Times just gave Jenny McCarthy a column, and I think the argument that media needs more self-respect is over. Self-respect did not win, BTW.) 

This piece is like a football game between Nazis and child molesters, where you're primarily rooting for violent injuries. I think my favorite part is when ex-con Conrad basically admits that it was all fine and dandy for Rupert to rape and pillage so long as he did it with his pinky finger properly crooked: 

As I have often written before, he is probably the greatest media-owner in history, and his achievements in becoming the tabloid leader in London, in cracking the egregious Luddite print unions there, in breaking the triopoly of American television networks, promoting vertical integration with television outlets and film production, and his pioneering breakthroughs in satellite television worldwide, are Napoleonic in boldness of concept and skill of execution. And no one has been more vocal or consistent than I in saluting them.

I competed with Murdoch, successful and quite cordially, in Britain for 15 years when we had theTelegraph newspapers, and for a time in Australia. Our relations and those of our wives were always quite convivial.

Sure, he broke unions and slashed prices and generally acted like all the world was fuel for his personal bonfire. Sure, the wars Murdoch and his allies championed are still sending boys and girls home in boxes, years after it became clear that those wars would never be won, because his influence was such that it is treason to speak of the drawbacks to blowing up the entirety of the Middle East.

Sure, he poured poison in all our wells, and sure, he dug his claws into all of our backs, and sure, we are meaner and smaller and poorer and sicker than we have ever been in no small part because of the work he did, but he's from such a lovely family, and he's so well-spoken, too. 

But when he said mean things about me, when he made fun of me, when he pointed out that I was filthy, then I was offended. and then I was outraged, and then I was compelled to call him a monster. Because that was a bridge too far. 

A. 

Shorter John Kerry: Who You Callin' A Bitch?

U-N-I-T-Y: 

Ask Osama bin Laden is he is better off now than he was four years ago.

[snip]

You know it isn’t -- it isn’t fair. It isn’t fair to say that Mitt Romney doesn’t have a position on Afghanistan. He has every position.

(APPLAUSE)

He -- he was against -- he was against setting a date for withdrawal. Then he said it was right. And then he left the impression that maybe it was wrong to leave this soon. He said it was tragic to leave Iraq. And then he said it was fine. He said we should have intervened in Libya sooner. Then he ran down a hallway to run away from the reporters who were asking questions. Then he said, the intervention was too aggressive. And then he said the world was a better place because the intervention succeeded. Talk about being for it, before you were against it.

(APPLAUSE) Mr. Romney -- Mr. Romney -- Mr. Romney, here’s a little advice; before you debate Barack Obama on foreign policy, you’d better finish the debate with yourself.

(APPLAUSE)

Now -- President Mitt Romney -- President Mitt Romney, three very hypothetical words that mystified and alienated our allies this summer. For Mitt Romney an overseas trip was what you call it when you trip all over yourself overseas.

(APPLAUSE)

You know, it wasn’t -- it wasn’t a goodwill mission. It was a blooper reel.

[snip]

Folks, Sara Palin said she could see Russia from Alaska. Mitt -- Mitt Romney talks like he’s only seen Russia by watching Rocky IV.

At which point the watching party I was at lost its goddamn collective mind. 

People are always surprised whenever I tell them my one true political love is John Kerry. I mean, John Kerry? He's boring. He lost. And conventional wisdom is that he lost because he was boring and elite and lacked backbone and what have you, he windsurfed and shit. He's French. 

Well, call me a Frog because hot damn, last night he walked out onto the stage and told Mitt Romney his other ride was Mitt's mom and next time if Romney doesn't shape up he might not use the saddle. 

And immediately the commentary was WHERE WAS THIS GUY FOUR YEARS AGO, because certainly our noble political punditry couldn't possibly have fallen all over itself to make Kerry unsuitable despite the hockey-playing, liberal-lion-2, war-hero story he had to offer them. Surely they couldn't have missed something. 

Except yeah: 

"Did the training wheels fall off?" –-after being told by reporters that President Bush took a tumble during a bike ride "Here I am in the state of New Mexico. George Bush is still in the state of denial. New Mexico has five electoral votes. The state of denial has none. I like my chances." "Invading Iraq in response to 9/11 would be like Franklin Roosevelt invading Mexico in response to Pearl Harbor." "Being lectured by the president on fiscal responsibility is a little bit like Tony Soprano talking to me about law and order in this country." "Cheney can claim Bush as a dependent." –-item #3 on Kerry's "Top 10" list of Bush tax proposals, as read on the "Late Show With David Letterman" "I wanted to have John Edwards stand. Dick Cheney wanted to sit. We compromised and now George Bush is gonna sit on Dick Cheney's lap." –- discussing negotiations over the vice presidential debate

(And before anybody starts in with me about Edwards, ask yourself if the worst thing he has ever done is still nicer than the nicest thing Dick Cheney has ever done. As long as he wasn't Vice President of Being Responsible With One's Penis, he probably could have muddled through.)

In fact, watching Kerry actually made me remember my biggest disappointment with Obama, his truly dismal record on civil liberties. That was what Kerry ran on in 2004, and the biggest wrong he would have righted if we could have pulled our heads out of our asses and elected him. It was why, all kidding about OMG WHATTA BABE aside, I fell in love with him: He went to war and came home and at the age of 27 walked into the halls of Congress and said stop this, stop this now before it gets any worse. 

We all should have listened then, and again in 2004. Maybe we'll listen now. 

A. 

Today on Tommy T's Obsession with the Freeperati - Newt Gingrich Death Watch edition

 

Well, folks - other than the never-ending Freepathon, Jim (I'm all in for Newt Gingrich) Rob has been MIA for weeks now.

Maybe he's too depressed after this:

Live Thread: GOP Primary election results (WI, MD, DC)
April 3, 2012

Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:24:56 PM by newzjunkey

Fox News & CNN are projecting Romney wins MD in their banners.

 Santorum wasn't on the DC ballot.

 Wisconsin polls close at 8pm CDT/9pm EDT.

1 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:25:04 PM by newzjunkey

Kibitzer, be a pal and grab some more popcorn please? Southern Beale - more wine?  We'll just watch this one from outside the iso chamber, I think.

To: FlingWingFlyer

Why do we give them 19 delegates? I mean, I can understand throwing them a bone and giving them 6, but 19 is just plain ridiculous when the GOP candidate can’t break 20% in an awesome year.

"You keep using that word..."

They make Hawaii look competitive.

9 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:46:14 PM by RecoveringPaulisto

"Recovering Paulisto"?  If he recovered from being a Ron Paul supporter and is now for Newtie, he may wish he had stood on principle.

Or on a stepladder.

To: newzjunkey

The republican party is half past dead and if we don’t get a blood transfusion ASAP, it’s over. romney will never beat oscumma in a million years. This is sickening.

10 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:47:09 PM by MestaMachine (obama kills)

To: newzjunkey

I live in the People's Republic of Maryland. Hit the polling place after work at about 1830 - the place was like a tomb.

Considering the average age of the GOP electorate, what did you expect? Mardi Gras?

I cast my vote, and I don't mind telling you that I voted for the Newtster.

And I don't mind telling yo uthat you threw your vote away.  And you dimrods don't have a lot of them to spare.

When it came to the Senatorial candidates I didn't even recognize any of the names except two - one a nutcase named John Kimble - I voted against him and for Mr. Douglas. I understand Romney has projected winner in the presidential contest.

As I have said before on this forum, I will not vote for that RINO sonofabitch in the general election!

13 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:49:17 PM by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)

.

.

To: MestaMachine

We are doomed.

You were doomed the moment you embraced The Southern Strategy as a political tool.  It's just taking longer for you to die off than I had originally thought.  But you're getting there.

Witness the death of the grand old party and the birth of a new moderate to liberal republican party vs a left-wing radical democrat party.
America will never rebound in my lifetime and this is the legacy we are leaving our children and grandchildren. Memories of a once great nation being brought to it's knees. I don't know which feeling is stronger...sadness or anger.

18 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:56:31 PM by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)

How about stupid? Does stupid work for you?

To: MestaMachine

The republican party is half past dead and if we don’t get a blood transfusion ASAP, it’s over. romney will never beat oscumma in a million years. This is sickening.

By virtue of these Romney wins (and probable eventual Republican nomination), the GOP is giving Obama his second term on a silver platter. Everyone I talk to sees it the same way. Romney is NOT anyone's first choice and people are disillusioned with the apparent John McCaining of conservatives for the second time in a row. This is republican party suicide and everyone can see it except the elites who are forcing this candidate down our throats.

You'd rather have Santorum shoved down your throats?  Yuck.

May God help America out of this potential disaster.

21 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:01:46 PM by MamaDearest

.

.

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

It appears like the electorate is starting to take a stand and make a solid choice to defeat Obama. They almost unanimously said that it is now more important to get behind a candidate soon, and to not delay or hinder the nomination.

Why do I get the feeling that's what you wanted all along. So what's your real name, Rove?

25 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:04:46 PM by Kenny

.

Shirley.

.

To: Kenny

I don’t give a damn what you think. The problem with your side is, you were warned that supporting Santorum would guarantee a Romney win. Well, guess what?..............We all lose.

32 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:10:14 PM by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)

I see that the Newticles and Saint-orums are still busily pointing fingers at each other over Romney's tawdry inevitibility,

Good.  Gives them something to do during the General besides vote.

To: MamaDearest

It’s high time for a third party, but the GOP talking heads in the news media will do their darndest to keep party-line Republicans in line with their usual talking points and scare tactics.

“Let’s change the GOP from within!”

Riiight. It’s not like the establishment holds the reins of power or anything.

And 17% (at best) of the electorate will magically unelect/unseat all of them and march proudly on to victory!

I love this place.

“But a third party will never win!”

Romney will never win, either, but we’re supposed to vote for him.

“But a third party will split the vote!”

Good! It’s time for the Republicans to go the way of the Whigs.

And time for "conservatives" to go the way of the Know-nothings.

What did caving to the establishment get us in ‘08?

Pandering to the screwball right via putting a simpleton up for Veep who had to be advised of the difference between WWI and WWII is now "caving to the establishment"??  Fancy that.

What did it get us in ‘12? Will 2016 be any different?

35 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:11:06 PM by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)

.

.

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Then it is time for Romney to get out of the race. He can’t win.

38 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:13:14 PM by muawiyah

To: parksstp

SANTORUM ON LIVE ON FOX RIGHT NOW, GIVING ONE OF THE BEST SPEECHES,

I'm kinda partial to this one:

.

(STILL FIGHTING ON) HITTING ALL THE POINTS THAT ENCOMPASS THE CENTER OF FREE REPUBLIC AND ITS OWN PRINCIPLES. 9:25 p.m. Eastern Time

 

He called Obama a "dictator", and he just now referred to Romney as an "etch a sketch".

56 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:26:58 PM by AmericanInTokyo (Our Fearless Leader, Jim, Should "Release" Freepers to Support Santorum as Final "Anti-Romney" ASAP)

.

.

To: AmericanInTokyo

The greatest Santorum line was hitting Romney. He has got the crowd fired up. His bashing Obama and Romney is most excellent.

He is also revisiting Republican Party history, its failure to win elections by nominating MODERATES—as controlled by the Leadership vanquishing the conservative grassroots. Great speech! Packed House.

62 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:30:13 PM by AmericanInTokyo (Our Fearless Leader, Jim, Should "Release" Freepers to Support Santorum as Final "Anti-Romney" ASAP)

When you have everyone who voted for you in that state in one room, of course it's gonna look crowded.

But it's not a Packed House.

.

This is a Packed House:

.

.

Just sayin.

Much more, including new additions to the RINO ranks after the fork in the road...

In Defense of Dana Loesch

She happens to be right, after all: 

After playing a news clip describing the video, Loesch said, "I'd drop trou and do it too. That's me, though. I want a million cool points for these guys." She wondered why there was any kind of scandal surrounding the incident.

"C'mon people, this is a war," she said. "Do I have a problem with that as a citizen of the United States? No, I don't."

Not about the "million cool points" the people who desecrate corpses deserve, or about how she would do it, too (anybody predicting how he or she would react in that situation is a liar; you have no idea), or about how pissing on corpses is somehow anything but offensive and filming it so as to brag to the world isn't catastrophically stupid. But about how this is a war. 

This is a war. And this. And this. And this. 

This is a war. 

This is a war. 

And it's not that this is a war, and we should be okay with any sickness that comes out of it. There are reasons, after all, that we have rules about safe conduct and treatment of prisoners and enemies, good reasons. 

But this is a war, and we should know before we start that sickness like this WILL come out of it. You start a war, which means you take people, not all of whom are geniuses, not all of whom are decent and compassionate and capable of restraint, and you throw them into a horror unlike anything they've ever known. It is not excusing them, in the least, to understand what happens then.

You march them through charnel houses and you kill their friends in front of them, and in the case of our current conflicts you add a sense of futility and endlessness and obliviousness on the part of people at home who are making movies about this stuff like it's over already, and even some of the decent, compassionate, restrained ones are going to absolutely lose their shit. 

This is a war. Which is why you don't start them in the first place. Which is why you don't start them unless you absolutely have to. Unless you know you have no other choice. Unless you know how to end them as quickly as possible. Unless you're ready not only for what will be done to your enemies, but what doing that will do to you. Unless you think you can carry that, because you sure as hell can't prevent it all. 

That's not what Loesch meant, but it is what she said, however unintentionally.

This is a war. 

A. 

The War Isn't Over

It never will be:

In Afghanistan’s wartime kleptocracy, which chronically neglects its most able-bodied citizens, people with disabilities occupy a special rung of the forsaken. Most survive on the sometime charity of their impoverished neighbors and relatives, on trifling alms tossed into the dust at mosque gates and bazaar stalls. To them, the government stipend—a pittance even in this country, where a kilogram of rice costs around 70 cents—is a lifeline, access to which winds through a bureaucratic labyrinth that seems designed to discourage beneficiaries rather than assist them.

Handicap International, which monitors the rights of the disabled worldwide, reports that more than half of all Afghans—or more than 15 million people—live with some level of physical or sensory impairment, and that more than 800,000 suffer from severe disabilities. Most of these impairments are the poisonous repercussions of war, which has been lashing Afghanistan ceaselessly since the 1970s: battle wounds and injuries from land mines and ordnance that detonate in villages and cities long after the fighting has ceased, and handicaps that could have been averted had incessant conflict not decimated the land’s infrastructure and stunted its health care system, condemning millions of people to lifelong suffering from preventable diseases and accidents.

The ranks of the disabled swell with each bombing, each firefight of the U.S.-led counterinsurgency, officials in Kabul say. Last year, more than 3,270 people were injured in this most recent war. But only 124,661 disabled receive government support: a fraction, government officials admit.

Via Erin.

A.

Today on Tommy T's Obsession with the Freeperati - "Ashes in their mouths" edition

Good morning, everyone!

You know, I almost - almost - feel sorry for the Freepers.

First the birth certificate, and now this.

Rumsfield Chief of Staff tweet: Osama Bin Laden Killed (Confirmed!)
Twitter - Keith Urbahn (Rumsfield's COS)

Posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:43:12 PM by ph12321

Chief of Staff of Donald Rumsfield tweeted OBL has been killed. Perhaps this is Obama's new speech coming soon?

1 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:43:14 PM by ph12321

.

To: ph12321

Why is the first thing I think is: How convenient?

Good if true.

It's true. This man is a moron.

3 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:45:02 PM by CommieCutter (Promote Liberal Extinction: Support gay marriage and abortion!)

.

.

To: ph12321

well wag the dog,
this will cover the fake birth certificate!!!!

5 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:45:07 PM by 9422WMR (Illegal is not a race. Obamacare is a crime)

.

.

To: ph12321

That would be great news to be sure! Watch the marxist girl child try to take credit.

11 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:46:16 PM by fuzzybutt (Democrat Lawyers are the root of all evil.)

For what? Reactivating the Bin Laden desk at the CIA after Dubya de-activated it? Perish the thought!

To: ph12321

The death certificate has been faked. Check for chromatic aberration.

14 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:46:37 PM by ClearCase_guy

Heh.

To: ph12321

“Chief of Staff of Donald Rumsfield”
Your first clue this is BS.

24 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:48:11 PM by 9422WMR (Illegal is not a race. Obamacare is a crime)

.

To: freebilly

Hope it’s true....

Seriously?! I can't stand the thought of this pretender taking credit for OBL's death. Ugh ... the left will go nuts over this.

33 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:49:18 PM by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)

There you have it, folks - Freepers would rather Bin Laden was still alive than killed at the order of President Obama.   Priorities.

.

To: freebilly

Are you sure?

I mean Obama kinda looks like him without the beard.

And we’ve never seen them in the same room together at the same time.

47 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:51:08 PM by Jonty30

The downward spiral continues after our jump into the mouth of madness,,,

May Day for bin Laden

I'm Greek so I understand vendettas and the desire for vengeance. The Greeks aren't as obsessive about revenge as the Sicilians but try ordering Turkish coffee in any Hellenic eatery. If you do so, prepare to duck because some crockery may be headed your way. Smash.

I had a Greek-Greek relative who was convinced that everything good was invented by the Greeks: it was like hearing a Stalinist insist that Russians had invented the telephone, telegraph and Tina Turner's dance moves. I once asked this Uncle (a third cousin but every guy who's older than you in a Greek family is called Theo or Uncle) to explain why baklava was made throughout the former Ottoman Empire if it was strictly a Greek dish. His answer: it was spread by itinerant Greek chefs who fed phylo to the Turkish phillistines. (Okay, that last bit was embellishment.) He went on to remind me that if it was Turkish, it was skattah (shit.) I didn't buy it but I enjoyed busting the old boy's chops.  

That was a circuitous way of saying that, while I don't plan to dance in the street to celebrate bin Laden's demise, I'm not shedding any tears for a mass murderer. Slaying that particular bearded dragon doesn't really change much but I've enjoyed observing the political contortions of folks on both the far left and far right; all of whom are determined to fit this unwieldy narrative into an ideologically tidy box. Forget about it, y'all. The world is not only a mess, it's messy.

Even before May Day, Osama bin Laden was yesterday's man. I'm far more interested in seeing if we yet again send the Pakistanis to bed without supper and then throw another a few billion dollars at them. Spare the rod, spoil the Pakstani security forces. It's clearly time to put them on a starvation diet since Osama was hiding in plain sight not far from the Pakistani version of West Point. What does it take for us to get properly pissed off at the Pakistanis? If this doesn't do it, nothing will. I suspect, however, that our abusive relationship with Pakistani will continue...

Malaka Of The Week: Bryan Fischer

I didn't write a malaka of the week post last week but the malakatude kept rolling. This week's winner is some hairbag I'd never heard of before but Bryan Fischer is a class-A malaka and worthy of this "honor."  This douchebag is the "issues" director of the American Family Association and he's also a guy who puts the ass in association.

While the rest of America celebrated the heroism and humility of Medal of Honor winner Sgt. Salvatore Giunta, Mr. Fischer slammed the selection in a post at his AFA blog:

We have feminized the Medal of Honor. According to Bill McGurn of the Wall Street Journal, every Medal of Honor awarded during these two conflicts has been awarded for saving life. Not one has been awarded for inflicting casualties on the enemy. Not one.

Gen. George Patton once famously said, "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other guy die for his." [Note: Patton either said bastard or son of a bitch. He was a cussing General. So, fuck you for misquoting him, Malaka Fischer.]

When we think of heroism in battle, we used the think of our boys storming the beaches of Normandy under withering fire, climbing the cliffs of Pointe do Hoc while enemy soldiers fired straight down on them, and tossing grenades into pill boxes to take out gun emplacements.  That kind of heroism has apparently become passe when it comes to awarding the Medal of Honor. We now award it only for preventing casualties, not for inflicting them.

So the question is this: when are we going to start awarding the Medal of Honor once again for soldiers who kill people and break things so our families can sleep safely at night? I would suggest our culture has become so feminized that we have become squeamish at the thought of the valor that is expressed in killing enemy soldiers through acts of bravery. We know instinctively that we should honor courage, but shy away from honoring courage if it results in the taking of life rather than in just the saving of life. So we find it safe to honor those who throw themselves on a grenade to save their buddies.

I would suggest, sir that you're a buffoon, idiot and, above all else, a malaka. I looked up Fischer's bio and was "shocked" to learn that he's another in a long line of blood thirsty chickenhawks with no military record. It's very easy for an armchair warrior like Fischer to prattle on about the glory of killing when he's never had to aim a weapon at anyone in his life. Neither have I but I have enough sense to know that when soldiers are in the field they're fighting for their own lives and those of their comrades. If someone in your unit is killed, a part of you dies as well.

My father was a World War II veteran. He hated war and refused to discuss his war time experiences. I wish that he had but I know that whatever he went through was so painful that he had no interest in reliving it. He was a conservative Republican BUT hated guns and wouldn't allow one in our house. He was an Army interpreter so I don't know if he ever had to shoot at anyone but he thought war was a horrible thing that should only be waged when all else failed. I guess Malaka Fischer would consider that a sign of creeping feminization. I call it humanity. Of course, the only human life that creeps like him value is in vitro.

I have a pretty good idea of where the Bryan Fischers, Newt Gingriches and Dick Cheneys of the world got their sick and twisted notions about the "glory" of war: John Wayne movies. Guess what guys, John Wayne was a chickenhawk who dodged the draft in World War II and stayed in Hollywood to further his film career. Wayne spent the rest of his life overcompensating for this by being a rabid war lover, which is why his influence on "manly" rightwingers is so ironic. 

The most fascinating thing about Malaka Fischer's attack on Sgt. Giunta is that the latter is everything a hero should be. He's modest, humble and self-sacrificing. He melted my icy blue heart when he said that he'd give up the medal in a heartbeat if he could bring his fallen friends back to life. That's the stuff that real heroes are made of. To extend, and perhaps even strain, the cinematic analogy, Sgt. Giunta reminds me of Gary Cooper as Sgt. York, a soft spoken pacifist turned warrior whose heroism was motivated by the desire to protect his brothers in arms. We need more modest Gary Coopers and fewer strutting John Waynes in the world as well as more men like Salvatore Giunta and fewer malakas like Bryan Fischer.

Only Talking Sense

Holy crap, someone in Washington is talking sense about Afghanistan albeit off the record and to the British press:

The White House is revising its Afghanistan strategy to embrace the idea of negotiating with senior members of the Taliban through third parties – a policy to which it had previously been lukewarm.

Negotiating with the Taliban has long been advocated by Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, and the British and Pakistani governments, but resisted by Washington.

The Guardian has learned that while the American government is still officially resistant to the idea of talks with Taliban leaders, behind the scenes a shift is under way and Washington is encouraging Karzai to take a lead in such negotiations.

"There is a change of mindset in DC," a senior official in Washington said. "There is no military solution. That means you have to find something else. There was something missing."

That missing element was talks with the Taliban leadership, the official added.

The American rethink comes in the aftermath of the departure last month of General Stanley McChrystal, the top US commander in Afghanistan.

Barack Obama, apparently frustrated at the way the war is going, has reminded his national security advisers that while he was on the election campaign trail in 2008, he had advocated talking to America's enemies.

It's about frakking time. That war is clearly unwinnable in the classic sense: the best that can be hoped for is that the Taliban won't overrun the country. No central Afghan government has ever controlled the entire country and none ever will, it's topographically impossible. Geography is destiny: there will be always be rebels in the hills shooting down at the government in places like Colombia and Afghanistan.

I'm glad that Obama is reviving his strongly stated campaign position that to make peace anywhere in the world one must talk to one's adversaries. One reason the Israeli-Palestinian peace process is all process and no peace is that both sides want to dictate who they'll negotiate with. You cannot pick your negotiating partners. If Tony Blair, Bertie Ahern and the loyalists and nationalists were able to end the Troubles in Northern Ireland, anything is possible. Northern Ireland should have been Blair's legacy BUT unfortunately for all concerned Iraq defined his government.

British Prime Minister David (Call me Dave) Cameron will be meeting with Obama this week and will surely have his back on this point. It's time to start winding things down in Afghanistan and if we need to use General Petraeus' surge thingee as cover, so be it. I'm glad that after years of nonsense, tentative moves towards a more sensible policy are being made. It's time for us to go.

McChrystal Cracked

I'd come around to the McChrystal must go viewpoint so I'm glad it happened so quickly. Not only does he deserve to be shitcanned for mouthing off but his favorite beer is Bud Lite Lime. Holy girl drink, Batman.

On a serious note, I thought it was politically ingenious to slide Petraeus into the command slot. The wingers have expressed such unconditional love for him that it will be *harder* for them to gin up outrage over this.

McChrystal Blue Persuasion

General Stanley McChrystal and his staff have big mouths. They didn't tell a reporter that stuff was off the record when they were in bars and eateries. Another fine story from Rolling Stone this time around by freelancer Michael Hastings.

I'm too lazy to dig for the bullet points on my own so I'll let the Gray Lady do the talking:

A McChrystal aide is quoted saying of Mr. Holbrooke: “The Boss says he’s like a wounded animal. Holbrooke keeps hearing rumors that he’s going to be fired, so that makes him dangerous.”

On another occasion, General McChrystal is described as reacting with exasperation when he receives an e-mail message from Mr. Holbrooke. “Oh, not another e-mail from Holbrooke. I don’t even want to open it.”

The article also describes a conversation in which General McChrystal and an aide talk about Mr. Biden. Mr. Biden is known to have opposed the decision to escalate the war, preferring instead a slimmed-down plan focused on containing terrorism.

“Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” General McChrystal jokes.

“Biden?” suggests a top adviser. “Did you say ‘Bite me?’ ”

Classic trash talk or bar room bravado. But why on earth did they not go OFF THE FUCKING RECORD? I have friends in the MSM and we always explicitly ask one another that something be off the record or unattributed; especially if it's juicy. This is juicy.

Bob Gates has already rebuked the wayward (there's that word again) General. John Kerry is urging caution. Steve Clemons wants his ass fired.

Right now, I lean towards a stern rebuke unless the Veep wants McChrystal gone. Given Biden's own history, he's likely to be forgiving of the General making a pun that he's heard before. Many times. He's just biding time...

What do y'all think should happen to McChrystal? Rebuked? Fired? Mocked?

I'm not sure where I'll end up in this debate but I know one thing for sure: McChrystal rubs me the wrong way and not in a new age flake sorta way. I do, however, love his name, it's so punworthy. I guess you already noticed that...

Empty Chairs at Empty Tables

Bring the troops home.

A.

Happy Democrat photo: Once more, with context

VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Well, I-- I-- I would hope I-- look, it's one thing to be outspoken. It's another thing to be outspoken in a way that misrepresents the facts. And I-- I guess-- again, I-- it's almost like Dick is trying to rewrite history. I can understand where the-- why that would be-- you know, an impulse. And maybe he isn't-- literally, I'm not being facetious. Maybe he's not fully informed of what's going on. I mean, the progress we have made. There has never been as much emphasis and resources brought against Al Qaeda. The success rate exceeds anything that occurred in the last Administration. And they did their best. I'm not-- I'm not impugning their effort. It's simply not true that the President of the United States is not prosecuting the war against Al Qaeda with a vigor that's never been seen before. It's real. It's deep. It's successful. (emphasis mine)

"Exceeds anything that occurred in the last Administration."

Context:

We've had Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar in custody in Karachi since last week, Dick. 

Life During Wartime

Married and shipping out:

Two 19-year-olds are the first couple to be married in a civil ceremony in Cook County in 2010.

Janette Diaz of Schererville, Ind., and Jeremy Rodriguez of Chicago said their vows at 9:30 a.m. with County Clerk David Orr presiding. Rodriguez, a U.S. Marine who has already served one tour of duty in Iraq and will be doing a tour in Afghanistan in 2011, leaves Monday for Camp Lejeune in North Carolina.

The couple arrived for their marriage at 6 a.m., well before the office opened at 9 a.m.

A.

Ambivalent

Obama's speech hasn't sent me racing to the barricades to either oppose or support his policy. The best thing about the speech was its tone: somber and sober. Nobody does the two S's as well as the President. The worst thing about the speech was the troop increase: I doubt that it will work. Foreign powers have been trying to secure the rural areas of Afghanistan for centuries and there are always rebels in the mountains shooting at them. It's a combination of geography and culture: Afghanistan remains a largely illiterate country dominated by tribes and war lords.

This is a tough time to be President; much of Obama's job is to clean up the messes left behind by the recklessness, arrogance and stupidity of the Bushies. The Pashtun tribal areas of what could be called Afpakistan are perhaps the biggest mess of all. There was a rush to invade Afghanistan combined with mindless support for the Pakistani military junta of Musharraf. As we all know, that's what set the stage for the current mess.

Obama made it clear that he considers this course to be the least bad one for the country. I not only hope that he's right but that he will resist the inevitable demands from the Pentagon for more boots on the ground. I was relieved that he set a timeline for withdrawal and hope that he sticks to it. I think we should start withdrawing earlier than that and follow the sage advice of the Vietnam era Republican Senator from Vermont, George Aiken and "declare victory" and get the hell out of there pronto. Yeah, I know, everyone quotes Aiken at times like these but troubled times call for the classics. Speaking of which, Dan Rather was on the Rachel Maddow Show Monday night and also invoked the Aiken refrain:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Say What?

In a sign of how far right the GOP has moved, legendary fantasist, liar and douchebag, Oliver North is advising House Goopers on Afghanistan. I wonder if he'll suggest sending bibles to Karzai's brother instead of CIA lucre.

I've *never* understood, the Ollie North cult amongst the wingnuts; especially because the Reagans *both* repudiated everything he claimed about his relationship with Ronnie. I guess the Reagan cult is like everything else on the far right: they pick what they like and disregard the rest. Sheesh...

'I Urge Everyone Not to Judge'

This inspired me to go wandering around the wingersphere looking for what was being said about the captured soldier's statements on video.

Until the truth comes out, I urge everyone not to judge anything this Soldier says as anything other than coerced and/or under duress. There comes a point where you will verbally give away your first born child if it means extending your life by one more day in order to buy some time for those looking for you. Most troops will not be held accountable for the things they say or do in captivity. Naturally, those that faulted McCain for his words in captivity simply don’t understand this concept and will probably fault this guy in the future for everything he says. Liberals are like that. They’re all about…never mind. I can’t go there. Gotta watch my blood pressure.

Which led me to remember the crowning glory of many a wingnut welfare queen's career, and how willing they all were to give Jill Carroll the benefit of the doubt, for her statements in captivity. Assholes.

Would be nice if next time, they took their own advice. There's really nobody these people won't hate. The commenters at Blackfive are already all over this guy, ie what was he doing when he allegedly walked away from his post, is it stupid to rescue or not rescue him, etc, fuck him anyway, blah blah blah. I swear, they're throwing bodies over the side before they're even cold, so quick are they to cut loose anybody who strays from the Narcissistic Right Wing Manual of Proper Behavior in All Situations From Ordering an Omelette to Going to War. And they don't even know what this is yet.

Pfc. Bowe R. Bergdahl, 23, was serving with an Alaska-based infantry regiment earlier this month when he vanished, just five months after arriving in Afghanistan. He was serving at a base near the border with Pakistan in an area known to be a Taliban stronghold.

Bergdahl is from Hailey, a town of about 7,000 people in central Idaho where he worked as a barista and was active in ballet. A sign that hangs in the window of Zaney's River Street Coffee House says "Get Bowe Back," and a message inside asks customers to "Join all of us at Zaney's holding light for our friend."

Sue Martin, owner of the coffee shop, said she knew Bergdahl as a free-spirited young man with blond hair who rode his bicycle everywhere in town and was keen to learn as much as he could about the world.

"He joined the ballet. Then he joined the Army," Martin said in an interview from a room at Zaney's, which has become an impromptu meeting place for friends, acquaintances and the media since the Taliban video was shown around the world. "People have been calling and asking what they could bring to show their support."

A.

Morning Links

• Stars and Stripes has a detailed account given by soldiers of the terrible battle in Afghanistan in which 9 soldiers were killed.

• "As wars lengthen, toll on families mounts" at the Navy Times

• Congressional Delegation struck by lingering recovery in New Orleans from the Times Picayune

Poll: Fading support for War in Afghanistan

From ABCNews:

The latest ABC News/Washington Post poll found that a startling 45 percent of Americans said they do not think the war in Afghanistan is worth fighting, despite the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which provoked the war in the first place.

SNIP

Fifty-one percent of Americans now say that the U.S. military effort in Afghanistan has been unsuccessful, up from 24 percent in fall 2002.

Only 44 percent of Americans consider the war in Afghanistan a success, down from 70 percent in 2002.

Attacks in Afghanistan up 40%

CNN reported today that "the number of foreign forces in Afghanistan killed in June has reached 39, the highest monthly toll of the war."

In a Wednesday article Stars and Stripes reported that tactics used by insurgents in Afghanistan are becoming more complex and it included this:

Compared to the same time period in 2007, there has been a 40 percent increase in attacks against coalition personnel in Afghanistan since he took his post in early April, Schloesser said. [Army Maj. Gen. Jeffrey J. Schloesser, commander of Combined Joint Task Force-101]

Insurgents attacking coalition forces have increased their use of direct-fire attacks, indirect fire attacks which employ mortars and crude rockets, and improvised explosive devices such as roadside bombs, Schloesser said.

The enemy has decreased its number of suicide attacks, Schloesser said.

Twelve percent of all attacks, Schloesser said, are cross-border forays from Pakistan’s frontier into Afghanistan by an increasingly diverse variety of groups that are using the no-man’s land as a safe haven.

Brethren, Again We Gather to Worship the Free Market. Join the Chant: "Business Is More Efficient than Government...."

We sacrifice this one to appease Freede-Munn, the god of deregulation.

Today, we have yet more evidence that the government under Bush has been converted into a giant patronage machine to reward incompetent businesspeople.

Turns out that we care so much about our Afghan allies in the war against the Taliban and al-Qaeda that we ship them defective ammunition.  Who's responsible for this, shall we say, massive fuck up?

Why, a private business, of course!  Those entities run by Randian supermen who can do no wrong, the generators of wealth, the embodiments of the American spirit! 

Finished gagging yet?  Good.  We'll continue.

Yes, a small business in Florida obtained the contract to supply ammunition to Afghani security forces.  The ammunition they shipped was old and busted.  You wouldn't want to use this shit at all, not even for target shooting.  And some of it was manufactured in China, which makes its sale by a US company a violation of federal law.  The article informs us that the company contracted to supply the ammo, AEY Inc., is run by a 22-year-old.  This fact is not, in itself, an automatic disqualification.  However, the fact that the vice-president of the company, the person who should be there to back up and guide the young executive, is a licensed professional masseur.

Smell that?  It's incompetence.

Go read the article.  You will probably be shocked at just how fucked up the entire sordid affair is.  It's amazing just how much of our money has been handed out to irresponsible, incompetent, and just plain shady businesses.  Remember these days when people start telling you about how business always does things better than government. 

Justice,Chimpy-Style

Oy.  Can anyone think of a reason not to hold war crime trials in 2009?

KABUL, Afghanistan — Abdul Razzaq Hekmati was regarded here as a war hero, famous for his resistance to the Russian occupation in the 1980s and later for a daring prison break he organized for three opponents of the Taliban government in 1999.

But in 2003, Mr. Hekmati was arrested by American forces in southern Afghanistan when, senior Afghan officials here contend, he was falsely accused by his enemies of being a Taliban commander himself. For the next five years he was held at the American military base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where he died of cancer on Dec. 30.

The fate of Mr. Hekmati, the first detainee to die of natural causes at Guantánamo, who fruitlessly recounted his story several times to American officials, demonstrates the enduring problems of the tribunals at Guantánamo, say Afghan officials and others who knew him.

Afghan officials, and some Americans, complain that detainees are effectively thwarted from calling witnesses in their defense, and that the Afghan government is never consulted on the detention cases, even when it may be able to help. Mr. Hekmati’s case, officials who knew him said, shows that sometimes the Americans do not seem to know whom they are holding. Meanwhile, detainees wait for years with no resolution to their cases.

DoD pulls mention of friendly fire from posting on soldier's death

Stars and Stripes reports that DoD posted a press release to their website which stated an  investigation was under way into the possibility that a soldier killed recently in Afghanistan may have died as a result of friendly fire but later in the day DoD removed the posting  only to repost it without mention of friendly fire.

According to a DOD release, Kahler, 29, was killed by small-arms fire in the village of Waygul. The Army is investigating the incident, which it says might have been the result of friendly fire. An Afghan guard reportedly fired the fatal shots.

That release, however, was removed from the Web site later in the day.

Lt. Col. George Wright from the Army public affairs office said there were a “couple errors” in the original posting and that a new one should be posted soon. Asked if the information was incorrect or just posted prematurely, Wright replied: “The circumstances around his death are still being investigated.”

The Defense Department’s revised news release made no mention of a possible friendly-fire incident, but it did say the incident is under investigation.

Defense Department spokesman Lt. Col. Jonathan Withington said the changes made to the news release made it consistent with all department news releases.

Asked why the reference to friendly fire was removed, Withington said: “We leave it to the investigation. We don’t speculate in our releases.”

Withington deferred comment to the Army as to why the possibility of friendly fire was mentioned in the original release.

Southern European Task Force officials sent a news release later in the day to identify Kahler as the deceased soldier. The release made no mention of his death possibly being the result of friendly fire.

Stars & Stripes: New enemy in Afghanistan

On Monday WaPo reported Bush is facing pressure from the US military to shift focus from Iraq to Afghanistan including increasing force levels in the latter.  Interestingly Stars and Stripes reports today that US and Afghan forces are clashing with a new enemy  in Afghanistan....

ZABUL PROVINCE, Afghanistan — Foreign fighters with military uniforms are attacking U.S. and Afghan government forces in Zabul province using conventional infantry tactics, soldiers report. Intelligence suggests the foreign fighters are from Uzbekistan and the rebellious Russian territory of Chechnya, in central Asia, he said.

“The foreign fighters tend to be better trained and financed than the average Taliban. They have LBVs (load bearing vests) and canteens and sometimes black or green uniforms,” he said.

During firefights the foreigners use conventional infantry tactics like flanking, bounding and fixing targets, whereas attacks by local Pashtun Taliban are usually poorly executed, Piluek said.

SNIP

“You can tell if the enemy are well-trained,” he said. “If their attack is expertly executed, soldiers assume it is foreign fighters. When it is poorly executed, soldiers assume it is locals.”

Hearts and Minds

Splattered along a new road in Afghanistan.

KABUL, Afghanistan, Nov. 28 — A NATO airstrike killed 14 laborers working for an Afghan road construction company that had been contracted by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to build a road in the mountainous province of Nuristan in eastern Afghanistan, officials said.

The strike occurred late Monday night in the Norgram district of Nuristan when the Afghan workers of Amerifa Road Construction Company were sleeping in tents after a day’s work.

“Fourteen of our mechanics and laborers were killed as they were asleep in their tents,” said Nurullah Jalali, the executive director of the construction company. “We just collected pieces of flesh from our tired workers and put them in 14 coffins.”

The governor of Nuristan, Tamim Nuristani, said he could confirm that 13 workers had been “mistakenly” killed when NATO forces bombed the area based on what he said was an intelligence report that insurgents were infiltrating the area.

“All these victims are civilians, and they were from nearby provinces,” Mr. Nuristani said.

A NATO spokesman said its forces had struck the area in an attack on what it believed were Taliban insurgents but could not confirm that the road workers had been killed.

Mr. Jalali said that in the year his company had worked in the region, his workers had not come across any militants. “We have not seen any evidence of insurgency in that specific area, and we don’t know why and who attacked our laborers,” he said.

Fucking Up The "Good War"

War profiteering come first.

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- U.S. spending on aid work in Afghanistan is only a fraction of what the American military spends, and too much of the aid money pays the high salaries of expatriate employees, an international aid agency said Tuesday.

[snip]

Though the government aid arm U.S. Agency for International Development has spent more than $4.4 billion in Afghanistan since 2002, the British-based aid agency Oxfam said that figure is dwarfed by U.S. military spending here -- some $35 billion in 2007 alone.

''As in Iraq, too much aid is absorbed by profits of companies and subcontractors, on non-Afghan resources and on high expatriate salaries and living costs,'' said the report, which was prepared for a British parliament committee. ''Each full-time expatriate consultant costs up to half a million dollars a year.''

The U.S. Embassy in Kabul said it couldn't immediately comment.

The report said ''urgent action'' is needed to avert humanitarian disaster and that millions of rural Afghans face ''severe hardship comparable with sub-Saharan Africa.''

[snip]

''Some two-thirds of U.S. foreign assistance bypasses the Afghan government that officials say they want to strengthen,'' Oxfam said.

What Coalition?

Odds are Chimpy will continue to repeat his "Koizumi an' I talk about the peace" story despite this development.

Japan’s Defense Ministry ordered home its naval ships from the Indian Ocean today, ending for now a six-year mission in support of the war in Afghanistan that raised the nation’s military presence overseas but has recently drawn increasing criticism domestically.

A destroyer and supply ship that had been refueling warships for the United States and other nations were recalled at 3 p.m. as a special law authorizing the mission was due to expire at midnight. The government of Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda was unable to renew the law immediately because of opposition from the Democratic Party, which seized control of Parliament’s upper house in a landslide election victory during the summer.

The United States had urged Japan to extend the refueling mission which, while largely symbolic, provided important diplomatic support for Washington. The mission — based on a “special antiterrorism law” — constituted pacifist Japan’s main contribution to the Bush administration’s global campaign against terrorism.

Success, Rummy-Style

Hey, who kicked over the rock Don Rumsfeld has been hiding under?

NEW YORK (AP) — In an interview billed as his first since leaving the top Pentagon post, Donald Rumsfeld calls Afghanistan "a big success," but says U.S. efforts in Iraq are hampered by the failure of Iraq's government to establish a foundation for democracy.

"In Afghanistan, 28 million people are free. They have their own president, they have their own parliament. Improved a lot on the streets," Rumsfeld says in the October issue of GQ magazine.

Here's Rummy's definition of  "a big success".

Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan's president, has been forced to cut short a speech at a Kabul stadium after sounds that seemed liked gunshots were heard.

Witnesses said Karzai was hastily led away from the ceremony at the sports stadium by his US-trained bodyguards.

A government official urged the audience to be calm, saying that stones were thrown by people who could not get into the stadium.

[snip]

"Dear brothers and sisters, with respect to everybody, we are finishing our ceremony here," Karzai said as he left the stage.

An estimated 25,000 people, including cabinet members and foreign diplomats had gathered at the stadium which is located near the presidential palace.

The ceremony was held to mark the sixth anniversary of the death of Ahmad Shah Masood, a military leader of an anti-Taliban alliance, killed by a suspected al-Qaeda suicide bomber two days before the September 11 attacks in the United States.

Mushy Is No Poodle

Chimpy, two short days ago, during his presser with Hamid Karzai:

And finally, I do want to congratulate you on the joint jirga that's coming up. This is a meeting between President Karzai, President Musharraf and representative elements from parts of their respective countries, all coming together to talk about reconciliation and how we can work together -- how you can work together to achieve common solutions to problems. And the main problem is to fight extremism, to recognize that history has called us into action. And by fighting extremists and radicals, we help people realize dreams. And helping people realize dreams helps promote peace. That's what we want.

Ooops!  Spencer Ackerman tells us the ballyhooed jirga is a non-event.

Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf pulled out Wednesday from a council of hundreds of Pakistani and Afghan tribal leaders aimed at reining in militant violence.

Pakistan's Foreign Office said Musharraf was canceling his trip to Kabul because of "engagements" in Islamabad. Pakistani political analyst Talat Masood said, however, that Musharraf probably was responding to recent U.S. criticism of Pakistan's counterterrorism efforts, which has included suggestions that the U.S. could carry out unilateral military strikes against al-Qaida in Pakistan.

"He is trying to convey a strong message to the United States. There have been a lot of statements coming out of Washington about violating Pakistan's sovereignty and so on," Masood said.

A U.S. State Department official said the Bush administration was surprised and dismayed by Musharraf's snub, particularly after Karzai repeatedly expressed satisfaction about the meeting during a joint appearance with President Bush on Monday.

State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack said it was unclear if Musharraf could be persuaded to reconsider.

"We'll see if President Musharraf is able to attend any portion of the meeting," McCormack said.

The four-day "peace jirga," due to start Thursday, already is being boycotted by delegates from Pakistan's restive South and North Waziristan regions amid fear of Taliban reprisals.

The absence of Musharraf, Pakistan's army chief and most powerful figure, could further undermine its effectiveness.

[snip]

The idea of the jirga emerged from a September 2006 meeting in Washington of President Bush, Karzai and Musharraf that focused on ways to combat rising border violence.

[snip]

One Pakistani delegate, who will not be attending but requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak about it to media, said that in all about 100 of Pakistan's 350 delegates are boycotting, including all of the more than 60 Waziristan representatives.

One elder from South Waziristan, who didn't want to be identified, said he and others would not attend because of threats from Taliban and because of the turmoil on their own doorstep.

"Pakistan government wants us to go to Kabul, but local Taliban don't want us to do it," he said. "We cannot offend these Taliban because they will kill us if we don't obey them."

Freedom Dressing?

Italy is the new France.

ROME - The United States should wind down military operations in Afghanistan in favour of the NATO-led ISAF force there, Italy's foreign minister said Wednesday, citing an "unacceptable" civilian death toll.

"It is clear that the superposition of the ISAF and Enduring Freedom missions ... very often creates conditions in which military operations are not coordinated effectively and become dangerous for the civilian population," Massimo D'Alema told a parliamentary comittee.

[snip]

"We think it would be advisable to end" Enduring Freedom, D'Alema said.

The UN mission in Kabul estimated in early July that some 600 civilians had been killed since the start of the year, more than half by Afghan and international forces.

"It is essential for military activities to be coordinated in such a way as to reduce this kind of occurrence," D'Alema said, quoted by the ANSA news agency.

"The civilian casualties resulting from recent operations against the Taliban are morally unacceptable. They are a real disaster politically and have created major tensions between the Afghan government and the international forces," he said.

And In America's Forgotten War...

Crap.

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- A roadside bomb in eastern Afghanistan killed four American soldiers Monday, while two NATO troops died elsewhere and a battle in the country's poppy-growing heartland killed more than 50 suspected militants, officials said.

Because We Can't Seize Our Own Assets

Jesus.

President Bush has signed an order that allows the U.S. government to block the assets of any person or group that threatens the stability of Iraq. 

The order exempts the United States.

Poppies, Poppies [waves wand menacingly]

Heckuva job, Chimpy!

Afghanistan produced dramatically more opium in 2006, increasing its yield by roughly 49 percent from a year earlier and pushing global opium production to a new record high, a U.N. report said Tuesday.

Opium production in Afghanistan increased from 4,100 metric tons in 2005 to 6,100 metric tons in 2006, according to the 2007 World Drug Report released by the Vienna-based United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Opium is the main ingredient for heroin.

In 2006, Afghanistan accounted for 92 percent of global illicit opium production, up from 70 percent in 2000 and 52 percent a decade earlier. The higher yields in Afghanistan have brought global opium production to a new record high of 6,610 metric tons in 2006, a 43 percent increase over 2005.

Poodle Explained

More from Dan Froomkin:

Bob Roberts and Ryan Parry write in Britain's Daily Mirror: "Tony Blair feared George Bush would 'nuke the s**t' out of Afghanistan in revenge for 9/11, a sensational documentary will claim this week.

"Giving the inside story on the war, former British ambassador to the US Chris Meyer reveals: 'Blair's real concern was that there would be quote unquote 'a kneejerk reaction' by the Americans. . . . they would go thundering off and nuke the s**t out of the place without thinking straight.' . . .

"In Channel 4's candid two-part documentary The Rise and Fall of Tony Blair, Mr Meyer claims the threat explains why the Prime Minister vowed to stand 'shoulder-to-shoulder' with Bush over the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan -- to thwart his allguns blazing battle plan."

Could be true.  But on the other hand, the fact that Bush may have wanted to nuke the shit out of Afghanistan (no ** for me!) has little to do with Tony Blair's self-serving political ambitions.

Out Partner In Democracy And Moderation

The lovely and talented Pervez Musharraf.

President Gen. Pervez Musharraf said he would not allow two former premiers who are also his main political rivals to return to Pakistan to take part in upcoming elections, according to a report Friday.

The announcement seems likely to deepen Pakistan's political crisis, in which the military leader faces accusations of authoritarianism as well as a growing challenge from Islamic extremists.

Musharraf was asked during an interview with the private Aaj television channel about the aspirations of Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif to return from exile to lead their parties in parliamentary elections, due at the end of the year.

''No, they will not be returning before elections,'' Musharraf said in an excerpt shown before the screening of the full interview later Friday.

Musharraf has said he will ask lawmakers in the outgoing parliament to elect him to another five-year term as president. He has also resisted calls to give up his post as army chief.

Spillover

One, maybe two US soldiers killed in Pakistan.

Militants opened fire Monday on a convoy carrying U.S. and Pakistani military officials near the Afghan frontier, killing one American and one Pakistani soldier, the Pakistani army spokesman said.

At least two Americans and two Pakistani soldiers and were wounded.

Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad said ''miscreants'' -- usually a byword used by Pakistani officials to describe Islamic militants -- fired at the convoy carrying military officials who attended a meeting in the northwestern town of Teri Mangal.

[snip]

Rahmatullah Rahmat, governor of the Afghan border province of Paktia, said that he, U.S. military advisors and Afghan army leaders traveled by helicopter to Pakistan for the meeting.

He said that after the meeting finished, gunmen opened fire on the group as they were heading toward their helicopters. Rahmat reported two American dead and two wounded.

Running Out Of Patience

I don't think our friends in Afghanistan will tolerate this kind of shit much longer.

Airstrikes called in by U.S. Special Forces soldiers fighting with insurgents in southern Afghanistan killed at least 21 civilians, officials said Wednesday. One coalition soldier was also killed.

Helmand provincial Gov. Assadullah Wafa said Taliban fighters sought shelter in villagers' homes during the fighting in the Sangin district Tuesday evening, and that subsequent airstrikes killed 21 civilians, including several women and children.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has repeatedly said more must be done to prevent civilian casualties during military operations. He warned last week, after reports that 51 civilians were killed in the west, that Afghanistan ''can no longer accept civilian casualties they way they occur.''

[snip]

A resident of the area, Mohammad Asif, said five homes in the village of Soro were bombed during the battle, killing 38 people and wounding more than 20. He said Western troops and Afghan forces had blocked people from entering the area.

[snip]

The report of civilian casualties comes less than a week after Afghan officials said that 51 civilians were killed in the western province of Herat.

It also comes one day after the U.S. military apologized and paid compensation to the families of 19 people killed and 50 wounded by U.S. Marines Special Forces who fired indiscriminately on civilians after being hit by a suicide attack in eastern Afghanistan in March.

Afghanistan's upper house of parliament on Tuesday passed a bill calling for a halt to all international military operations unless coordinated with the Afghan government, action seen as a rebuke of the international mission here.

Trouble In The Client State

I don't think the Bush Assministration planned for this.

Afghanistan's government should hold direct talks with the resurgent Taliban and other opposition forces, the Afghan senate said in a formal vote on Tuesday, in a bid to end the rising bloodshed in the country.

The senate, the upper house of the Afghan parliament, also urged Western troops in the U.S.-led coalition and Afghan forces to halt the hunt for Taliban fighters and other militants.

The motion comes at a time of rising public discontent with the government of President Hamid Karzai over civilian casualties at the hands of Western troops, corruption and the failure to turn billions of dollars in aid into better livelihoods.

Meanwhile, In America's Other Little War

Afghan soldiers are fragging our troops.

Two American soldiers working as mentors to Afghan troops have been shot dead and two others wounded. U-S officials say the gunman was an Afghan soldier.

Just what the hell were they doing there, anyway.

The shooter was posted outside a prison being revamped to house Afghans transferred from Guantanamo Bay.

[snip]

The revamp is supposed to improve security at the jail, which is infamous among Afghans for tales of torture and appalling conditions dating back to communist rule in the 1970s. Since the U-S-led invasion in 2001 that topped the Taliban, hundreds of al-Qaida and Taliban suspects have been incarcerated there.

Afghanistan is experiencing its own little surge.

Last year was the bloodiest in Afghanistan since U.S.-led forces overthrew the Taliban in 2001 and violence is increasing this year.

More than 4,000 people were killed in fighting in 2006, a quarter of them civilians and more than 170 of them foreign soldiers.

Hearts, Minds, Etc.

Why does this keep happening?

Regional officials said Wednesday that 51 villagers, some of them women and children, were killed in recent fighting in western Afghanistan. The U.S.-led coalition said it had no reports of civilian deaths.

[snip]

Afghan President Hamid Karzai repeated his demands that more be done to prevent civilian casualties during military operations, saying he has been meeting regularly with officials of coalition and NATO forces trying to solve the problem.

''The intention is very good in these operations to fight terrorism. Sometimes mistakes have been made as well, but five years on, it is very difficult for us to continue to accept civilian casualties,'' Karzai told reporters.

''We can no longer accept civilian casualties the way they occur,'' he added. ''It is not understandable anymore.''

The U.S.-led coalition said two military operations conducted between Friday and Sunday by U.S. and Afghan forces in western Herat province's Zerkoh Valley killed 136 suspected Taliban -- the deadliest fighting in Afghanistan since January.

The bloodshed set off anti-U.S. protests by villagers, and Mohammad Homayoun Azizi, chief of the Herat provincial council, said two council members who visited the area reported to him that 51 civilians were killed.

The officials were part of a high-level delegation including lawmakers, police and intelligence officials who investigated the claim.

Azizi said the 51 bodies were buried in three different locations and included women and children. The dead included 12 relatives of a man named Jamal Mirzai, he said.

[snip]

University students burned a U.S. flag during a demonstration Wednesday in eastern Nangarhar province to protest the deaths of five people, including a woman and teenage girl, during a coalition-led raid over the weekend.

It was the fourth straight day of anti-America protests in the country.

A recent Human Rights Watch report said NATO and U.S. operations, including the use of airstrikes and heavy weapons, killed at least 230 civilians last year.

The War On Children

The United States of America becomes the first country in the history of the world to charge a child with war crimes.

The U.S. military has charged a 20-year-old Canadian held at the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as a suspected terrorist with murder and other crimes, the Pentagon announced.

Omar Ahmed Khadr, captured by U.S. troops in Afghanistan when he was 15, was formally charged with murder, attempted murder, conspiracy, providing material support for terrorism and spying, according to the Pentagon's announcement on Tuesday.

The charge of murder stems from a gunfight during which he threw a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier, Sgt. First Class Christopher Speer, before being captured by U.S. troops.

Khadr received about a month of one-on-one training from an al Qaeda member on rocket-propelled grenades, rifles, pistols, hand grenades and explosives in June 2002, according to his charge sheet. It said he spied on the U.S. military, converted land mines to roadside bombs intended to target U.S. troops and engaged coalition troops in small arms fire.

In charging Khadr, the U.S. becomes the first country to try a war crimes suspect who was a child at the time of the alleged violations, The Associated Press cited his Pentagon-appointed defense attorney, Marine Lt. Col. Colby Volkey, as saying.

Opponents of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay criticized authorities for subjecting Khadr to the same military trial system as adult terror suspects, AP reported. In any other conflict, he would have been treated as a child soldier, AP quoted Jumana Musa, advocacy director of Amnesty International, as saying.

Cheney Shits A Brick

In Afghanistan...

Q What do you think the symbolism is there for the -- for whoever carried this out? They said publicly that this was aimed at you. What does that --

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Who said that?

Q The Taliban --

THE VICE PRESIDENT: I hadn't heard that.

Q It was a Taliban spokesman quoted, saying that the attack was trying to get you.

Q What we're quoting them as saying is that they took responsibility for it, and they said they were aware that you were there.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: I hadn't heard that.

Poppies

I agree with Karzai's cabinet, spraying Afghanistan's poppy fields with herbicide is likely to poison the groundwater, kill wildlife, damage other crops, and sicken people.

But somehow I don't think that's why he made this decision.

Rebuffing months of U.S. pressure, Afghan President Hamid Karzai decided against a Colombia-style program to spray this country's heroin-producing poppies after the Cabinet worried herbicide would hurt legitimate crops, animals and humans, officials said Thursday.

The decision, reportedly made Sunday, dashes U.S. hopes for mounting a campaign using ground sprayers to poison poppy plants to help combat Afghanistan's opium trade after a record crop in 2006.

Karzai instead ''made a very strong commitment'' to lead other eradication efforts this year and said if that didn't cut production he would allow spraying in 2008, a Western official said on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

[snip]

Karzai's decision capped months of behind-the-scenes pressure to allow spraying like that already used in countries such as Colombia, where coca plants supply much of world's cocaine.

Just last month, John Walters, top U.S. anti-drug official, said Afgfhan poppies would be sprayed, although he did not say when. Walters, on a visit to Kabul, warned that Afghanistan could turn into a narco-state unless ''giant steps'' were made toward eliminating poppies.

However, no top Afghan officials had said publicly the government would carry out spraying.

-Holden

Miss Beazley Appointed Commander Of NATO Forces In Afghanistan

According to Yahoo news, Miss Beazley is now leading NATO forces in Afghanistan.

US President George W. Bush discussed efforts to crush Taliban and Al-Qaeda fighters in Afghanistan with the new commander of NATO's forces there, the White House said. Photo:/AFP

-Holden