Dongyi () was a collective term for people in eastern China and in lands located to the east of ancient China. People referred to as Dongyi vary across the ages.
The early Dongyi culture was one of
earliest neolithic cultures in China.
According to the earliest Chinese record, ''Zuo Zhuan'', the Shang Dynasty was attacked by King Wu of Zhou, while attacking Dongyi, and collapsed afterwards.
Culture
Dongyi culture was one of
the oldest neolithic cultures in China. Some Chinese scholars extend the historical use of Dongyi to prehistoric times, according to this belief, the neolithic culture correlates to
Houli culture,
Beixin culture,
Dawenkou culture,
Longshan culture and
Yueshi culture, five evolutionary phases. Deliang He, thinks that Dongyi culture used to be one of the leading cultures in
neolithic China.
The writing system of Dongyi was one of the oldest writing systems in neolithic China. There are opinions that the 20 pictogram characters discovered in a Dongyi tomb (山东莒县大汶口墓葬) in Shangdong indictates some of the characters found, like “旦、鉞(钺)、斤、皇、封、酒、拍、昃”, are still used in Chinese characters.
There are also opinions that Dongyi people were the inventor of arrows. Some classic Chinese history records like ''Zuo Zhuan'', ''Shuowen Jiezi'', ''Classic of Rites'', all have some similar records about this. The legendary god of archery in Chinese mythology, Houyi, could also be a Dongyi leader.
Based on archeology findings, Dongyi people's ancestral worship totem is bird-shaped.
''Yi''
The
Chinese word ''yi'' in ''Dongyi'' has a long history and complex semantics.
Meanings
Chinese dictionaries give various meanings for ''yi'' (
夷). English translations include:
# (in ancient China) barbarians in the east
# foreign tribes or foreigners
# at ease; peaceful
# to level; to make level, even or smooth
# safe
# to eliminate; to exterminate; to kill; to execute
# injuries; wounds
# grades; classes
# common; usual; ordinary
# great; big
# a Chinese family name
These first two senses of ''yi'' reflect the linguistic
Sinocentrism of Chinese words that can mean both condescending "
barbarian" and semantically neutral "foreigner; outsider". For instance, ''hu''
胡 "barbarian; foreign; non-Chinese" (e.g.,
erhu) originally meant ''hu''
鬍 "beard; whiskers", and was chosen to name the Hu 胡 or
Donghu 東胡 "eastern barbarians: an ancient
Tungusic people northeast of China".
Characters
The modern
Chinese character 夷 for ''yi'' "barbarian; foreigner; etc." combines ''da''
大 "big" and ''gong''
弓 "bow". However, it graphically descends from an ancient
pictograph showing a person with a bent back and legs.
The (121 CE) ''Shuowen Jiezi'' character dictionary, which defines ''yi'' 夷 as 平 "level; peaceful" or 東方之人 "people of eastern regions", first records that this Han Dynasty (206 BCE-220 CE) regular script 夷 and the Qin Dynasty (221-207 BCE) seal script for ''shi'' incorporate the 大 "big" and 弓 "bow" radicals (recurring character elements). The Dongyi are associated with archery, and legends say their leader Houyi 后羿 invented the bow.
Bernhard Karlgren says that in the earlier bronze script for ''yi'' inscribed on Zhou Dynasty (ca. 1045 BCE-ca. 256 BCE) Chinese bronze inscriptions, "The graph has 'man' and 'arrow', or 'arrow' with something wound around the shaft."
The earliest records of ''yi'' were inscribed on oracle bones dating from the late Shang Dynasty (ca. 1600–ca. 1046 BCE). This oracle bone script was used interchangeably for ''yi'' 夷, for ''ren'' 人 "human", and for ''shi'' 尸 "corpse; personator of the dead; inactive; lay out". The historical linguist Xu Zhongshu explains this oracle character depicts either a "corpse"' with two bent legs or a "barbarian" custom of sitting with one's legs stretched out instead of the Chinese norm of squatting on one's heels.
Etymology
Historical linguists have tentatively reconstructed ''yi'' 夷's ancient pronunciations and
etymology. The
Modern Standard Chinese pronunciation ''yi'' descends from (ca. 6th-9th centuries CE)
Middle Chinese and (ca. 6th-3rd centuries BCE)
Old Chinese. Middle and Old Chinese reconstructions of ''yi'' 夷 "barbarian; spread out" include ''i'' < *''djər'', ''yij'' < *''ljɨj'', and ''ji'' < *''ləi''.
Axel Schuessler hypothesizes an Old Chinese etymological development from *''li'' 夷 "extend; expose; display; set out; spread out" to *''lhi'' 尸 "to spread out; lie down flat (in order to sleep); motionless; to set forth (sacrificial dishes)", to "personator of a dead ancestor", and to "corpse".
Usages
Pre-Qin usages
It is not easy to determine the times of people that a
Classical Chinese document reflects.
Literature describing a pre-Xia Dynasty period does not use the character ''yi''. As for the Xia Dynasty, some groups of people are referred to as the Yi. For example, "Yu Gong" (禹貢) of the ''Classic of History'' calls people in Qingzhou and Xuzhou as Laiyi (萊夷), Yuyi (嵎夷) and Huaiyi (淮夷). Another yi-related term is Jiu-yi (九夷), literally ''Nine Yi'', which could have also had the connotation ''The Numerous Yi'' or ''The Many Different Kinds of Yi'', and which appears in a passage in The Analects that reads, "The Master (i.e., Confucius) desired to live among the Nine Yi." The term "Dongyi" is not used for this period.
Shang Dynasty oracle shell and bone writings record ''yi'' but not ''Dongyi''. Shima Kunio's concordance of oracle inscriptions lists twenty occurrences of the script for 夷 or 尸, most frequently (6 times) in the compound ''zhishi'' 祉尸 "bless the personator; blessed personator". Michael Carr notes some contexts are ambiguous, but at least, "Three compounds refer to 'barbarians' (in modern characters, ''fayi'' 伐夷 'attack barbarians,' ''zhengyi'' 征夷 'punish barbarians,' and ''yifang'' 夷方 'barbarian regions')." Oracle inscriptions record that Shang King Wu Ding (r. ca. 1250-1192 BCE) made military expeditions on the Yi, and King Di Xin (r. ca. 1075-1046 BCE) waged a massive campaign against the Yifang 夷方 "barbarian regions".
It appears that the Yifang were the same people as Huaiyi (Huai River Yi), Nanhuaiyi (Southern Huai Yi), Nanyi (Southern Yi) and Dongyi in bronzeware inscriptions of the Western Zhou Dynasty. The Zhou Dynasty attempted to keep the Yi under its control. The most notable is the successful campaign against the Huaiyi and the Dongyi by the Duke of Zhou.
During the Spring and Autumn Period, Jin, Zheng, Qi and Song tried to seize control of the Huai River basin, which was occupied by the Huaiyi. But the region finally fell under the influence of Chu in the south. At the same time, people in the east and south ceased to be called Dongyi as they founded their own states. These Yifang states include the states of Xu, Zhongli, Ju and Jiang. The state Xu occupied large areas of Jiangxi, Jiangsu and Anhui between the Huai and Yangzi Rivers. Eventually, after warring with Chu and Wu, it was conquered by the State of Wu in 512 BC. Chu annexed the State of Jiang, destroyed the State of Ju whose territory was annexed by the State of Qi. Recent archaeological excavations reveal that the State of Xu's presence extended to western Jiangxi in modern Jing'an County. This includes bronzeware inscriptions about the State of Xu and also a tomb with many nanmu coffins containing sacrificial female victims. Dongyi customs include burials with many sacrificial victims and veneration of the sun.
References to Dongyi became ideological during the Warring States period probably because selves and others had subtle cultural differences among Chinese. The ''Classic of Rites'' (early 4th BC) made the first reference to the combination of "Dongyi" (east), "Xirong" (west), "Nanman" (south) and "Beidi" (north) in fixed four directions. At the same time "Dongyi" acquired a clearly pejorative nuance.
Post-Qin usages
The more "
China" expanded, the further east the term "Dongyi" was applied to. The ''
Records of the Grand Historian'' by
Sima Qian uses the term "Manyi" (蠻夷), but not "Dongyi". It puts the section of "Xinanyi (southwestern Yi) liezhuan (biographies)", but not "Dongyi liezhuan". The ''
Book of Han'' does not put this section either but calls a
Dongye (濊) chief in the Korean Peninsula as Dongyi. The ''
Book of Later Han'' puts the section of "Dongyi liezhuan (東夷列傳)" and covers
Buyeo,
Yilou,
Goguryeo,
Eastern Okjeo, Hui,
Samhan and
Wa, in other words, eastern
Manchuria,
Korea,
Japan and some other islands. The ''
Book of Jin'' positioned Dongyi inside the section of "Siyi" (barbarians in four directions) along with "Xirong", "Nanman" and "Beidi". The ''Book of Sui'', the ''Book of Tang'' and the ''New Book of Tang'' adopt the section of "Dongyi" and covers eastern Manchuria, Korea, Japan and optionally Sakhalin and Taiwan. During the Song Dynasty, the official history books replaced Dongyi with Waiguo (外國) and Waiyi (外夷).
Other usage of Dongyi in Chinese history books
Records of the Grand Historian and Book of Han
: These two history books do not assign many chapters to describe the history of Dongyi. However, it includes the simple description
Wiman Joseon. Wiman fled from the
state of Yan to
Gojoseon, and he disguised as if he was
Gojoseon people.
Book of Han uses the same term as Records of the Grand Historian.
Book of the Later Han
: This book was written by
Fan Ye (historian). This book contains the chapter of 'Dongyi', which describes the history of
Manchuria and
Korea including
Buyeo,
Goguryeo,
Okjeo,
Dongye, and
Samhan, and
Japan including
Wa.
Records of Three Kingdoms
: This book was written by Chen Shou, and also contains the chapter about 'Dongyi'. The chapter of "Wuwan Xianbei Dongyi" describes the Wuwan tribes, Xianbei tribes, and Dongyi tribes respectively. In the section of Dongyi, this book explains the
Manchurian,
Korean and
Japanese ancient kingdoms. Korean and
Manchurian kingdoms include
Buyeo,
Goguryeo,
Okjeo,
Dongye, and
Samhan. Japanese kingdom includes
Wa (Japan).
Book of Jin
: This book was written by Fang Xuanling at Tang dynasty. It has the chapter of 'Four Yi', and describes the
Manchurian, Korean, and Japanese history. Machurian, Korean and Japanese include
Buyeo,
Mahan confederacy,
Jinhan confederacy,
Sushen, and
Wa (Japan).
Book of Song
: This history book describes the history of
Liu Song Dynasty, but also contains the simple explanation the neighbor states. The Chapter of Dongyi of this book describes the ancient history of
Manchuria,
Korea and
Japan such as
Goguryeo,
Baekje and
Wa (Japan).
Book of Qi
: The Book of Qi is the history book of
Southern Qi. In the 58th volume, the history of Dongyi's history is described, which includes the ancient Manchurian, Korean and Japanese history such as
Goguryeo,
Baekje,
Gaya and
Wa (Japan).
History of Southern Dynasties
: This book is about the history of Liu Song, Southern Qi, Liang Dynasty, and Chen Dynasty, but also includes the history of Dongyi. In the chapter of Dongyi, this book describes the Manchurian, Korean and Japanese history such as
Goguryeo,
Baekje,
Silla,
Wa (Japan), and so on. Interestingly, this book says that Dongyi's state was
Gojoseon while Sima Qian says that Gojoseon people is Manyi.
8) Book of Sui
The Book of Sui describes the history about the Sui Dynasty, and was compiled at Tang dynasty. The chapter of Dongyi's history describes the history of Korean, Manchurian and Japanese such as Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla, Mohe, Liuqiu, and Wa (Japan).
Modern usages
Some Chinese scholars extend the historical use of Dongyi to
prehistoric times. They consider Dongyi as one of the origins of
Chinese people, based on the hypothesis of the pluralistic origins of
Chinese culture that became popular in 1980s.
People called Dongyi in this sense lived in Haidai (海岱) region, the lower reaches of the Yellow and Huai Rivers, from the Neolithic period.
The cultural evolution in the Haidai region is considered as follows (the dates differ among scholars):
Houli culture (6400 BC - 5700 BC)
Beixin culture (5300 BC - 4100 BC)
Dawenkou culture (4100 BC - 2600 BC)
Longshan culture (3200 BC - 1900 BC)
Yueshi culture (2000 BC - 1600 BC)
The Shandong Longshan culture was characterized by large-scale hierarchical groups of walled settlements. The Yueshi culture which replaced the Longshan culture around 2000 B.C. saw a decline of civilization. Groups of settlements were dissolved and the highly-developed pottery technology of the Shandong Longshan culture was lost.
It should be noted that the Longshan Culture was not just Dongyi and did not just exist in Shandong and other eastern coastal areas of China. Areas further west, including much of the middle and lower Yellow River Valley region, was also a part of the Longshan Culture area. Historians such as Jacques Gernet believe that the Longshan Culture was also culturally ancestral to the Erlitou Culture and the later Shang dynasty in the middle Yellow River Valley region. There are some good evidence for this claim, for both the Longshan and Shang cultures shared the following basic elements:
A similar technical of divination based on heating animal bones and shells until they crack.
Similar construction techniques for city-walls, fortifications and building platforms using rammed earth.
Similar artistic styles.
The Shang Dynasty technology of bronze metallurgy seems to be the descendant of high temperature ceramic-making techniques used by the late Neolithic Longshan Culture.
The Longshan Culture might have been replaced by the Yueshi Culture in Shandong but further to the west it continued and developed into the Erlitou Culture around 1900 - 1800 BC).
During the Yueshi culture in Shandong, the Erlitou culture and the subsequent Erligang culture gradually stretched from the Yellow River valley in the west. Since sites of the Yueshi culture are coterminous with those of the Erligang culture, the traditional theory that the Shang Dynasty originated in the east was shattered. Shang civilization extended to central Shandong at the end of the Shang Dynasty and it was during the middle Western Zhou Dynasty that the central civilization covered the entire Haidai region.
It is notable that Longshan people seemingly had their own writing system. A pottery inscription of the Longshan culture discovered in Dinggong Village, Zouping County, Shandong Province contains eleven characters and they do not look like the direct ancestor of Chinese characters. Chinese scholar Feng Shi (馮時) argued in 1994 that this inscription can be interpreted as written by the Longshan people. Other scholars, like Ming Ru, are doubtful about attributing a Neolithic date to the inscription. Some other scholars also claim a connection between ancient Dongyi and the modern Yi people in southwestern China.
See also
Huawaizhidi
Hua-Yi Distinction
Shùn
Sinocentrism
Footnotes
References
Baxter, William H. 1992. ''A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology''. Mouton de Gruyter.
Cai Fengshu 蔡鳳書, ''Kodai Santō bunka to kōryū'' 古代山東文化と交流, Higashi Ajia to hantō kūkan 東アジアと『半島空間』, pp. 45–58, 2003.
Carr, Michael. 2007. "The ''Shi'' 'Corpse/Personator' Ceremony in Early China," in Marcel Kuijsten, ed., ''Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness: Julian Jaynes's Bicameral Mind Theory Revisited'', Julian Jaynes Society, 343-416.
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1957. ''Grammata Serica Recensa''. Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities.
Li Xiaoding 李孝定. 1965. ''Jiagu wenzi zhishi'' 甲骨文字集釋 [Collected Explanations of Shell and Bone Characters]. 8 Vols. The Institute of History and Philology.
Luan Fengshi 栾丰实, 论“夷”和“东夷” (On "Yi" and "Dong Yi"), Zhongyuan Wenwu 中原文物 (Cultural Relics of Central China), 2002.1, pp. 16–20.
Matsumaru Michio 松丸道雄, ''Kanji kigen mondai no shintenkai'' 漢字起源問題の新展開, Chūgoku kodai no moji to bunka 中国古代の文字と文化, 1999.
Matsumaru Michio 松丸道雄 and Takashima Ken'ichi 高嶋謙一 ed., Kōkotsumoji Jishaku Sōran 甲骨文字字釋綜覽, 1994.
Schuessler, Axel. 2007. ''An Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese''. University of Hawaii Press.
Schuessler, Axel. 2009. ''Minimal Old Chinese and Later Han Chinese''. University of Hawaii Press.
Shima Kunio 島邦男. 1971. ''Inkyo bokuji sōorui'' 殷墟卜辞綜類 [Concordance of Oracle Writings from the Ruins of Yin], 2nd rev. ed. Hoyu.
Shirakawa Shizuka 白川静, Jitō 字統, 2004.
Tang Jiahong 唐嘉弘, 东夷及其历史地位, Shixue yuekan 史学月刊, 1989.4, pp. 37–46.
Xu Guanghui 徐光輝, ''Kodai no bōgyo shūraku to seidōki bunka no kōryū'' 古代の防御集落と青銅器文化の交流, Higashi Ajia to hantō kūkan 東アジアと『半島空間』, pp. 21–44, 2003.
Xu Zhongshu 徐中舒, ed. 1988. Jiaguwen zidian甲骨文字典 [Shell and Bone (i.e., Oracle) Character Dictionary]. Sichuan Cishu.
Further reading
Cohen, David Joel. 2001. ''The Yueshi culture, the Dong Yi, and the archaeology of ethnicity in early Bronze Age China''. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Anthropology, Harvard University.
External links
东夷文化网
东夷文化及对中华文化的贡献
Category:Ancient peoples of China
fr:Yi (peuple ancien)
ko:동이
ja:東夷
uk:Східні варвари
zh:东夷