Imperialism and colonization between 1900-1914
The term empire derives from the Latin imperium (power, authority). Politically, an empire is a geographically extensive group of states and peoples (ethnic groups) united and ruled either by a monarch (emperor, empress) or an oligarchy.
Aside from the traditional usage, the term empire can be used in an extended sense to denote a large-scale business enterprise (e.g. a transnational corporation), or a political organisation of either national-, regional- or city scale, controlled either by a person (a political boss) or a group authority (political bosses).[1]
An imperial political structure is established and maintained in two ways: (i) as a territorial empire of direct conquest and control with force (direct, physical action to compel the emperor’s goals), and (ii) as a coercive, hegemonic empire of indirect conquest and control with power (the perception that the emperor can physically enforce his desired goals). The former provides greater tribute and direct political control, yet limits further expansion because it absorbs military forces to fixed garrisons. The latter provides less tribute and indirect control, but avails military forces for further expansion.[2] Territorial empires (e.g. the Mongol Empire, the Median Empire) tended to be contiguous areas. The term on occasion has been applied to maritime empires or thalassocracies, (e.g. the Athenian and British Empires) with looser structures and more scattered territories.
An empire is a state with politico-military dominion of populations who are culturally and ethnically distinct from the imperial (ruling) ethnic group and its culture[3] — unlike a federation, an extensive state voluntarily composed of autonomous states and peoples.
What physically and politically constitutes an empire is variously defined. It might be a state effecting imperial policies, or a particular political structure. Empires are typically formed from separate components that come together. Some units include ethnic, national, cultural, and religious diversity.[4]
Sometimes an empire is a semantic construction, such as when a ruler assumes the title of “Emperor”. The said ruler's nation logically becomes an “Empire”, despite having no additional territory or hegemony such as Central African Empire or the Korean Empire proclaimed in 1897 when Korea, far from gaining new territory, was on the verge of being annexed by the Empire of Japan, the last to use the name officially. Amongst the last of these empires of the 20th century were the Central African Empire, Ethiopia, Vietnam, Manchukuo, the German Empire, and Korea.
The terrestrial empire’s maritime analogue is the thalassocracy, an empire comprising islands and coasts which are accessible to its terrestrial homeland, such as the Athenian-dominated Delian League.
The Akkadian Empire of Sargon the Great (24th century BCE), was an early large empire. In the 15th century BCE, the New Kingdom of Ancient Egypt, ruled by Thutmose III, was ancient Africa’s major force upon incorporating Nubia and the ancient city-states of the Levant. The first empire comparable to Rome in organization was the Assyrian empire (2000–612 BCE). The Median Empire was the first empire on the territory of Persia. By the 6th century BCE, after having allied with the Babylonians to defeat the Neo-Assyrian Empire, the Medes were able to establish their own empire, the largest of its day, lasting for about sixty years. The successful, extensive, and multi-cultural empire that was the Persian Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BCE) absorbed Mesopotamia, Egypt, part of Greece, Thrace, the rest of the Middle East, much of Central Asia and Pakistan, until it was overthrown and replaced by the brief-lived empire of Alexander the Great.
The Maurya Empire was a geographically extensive and powerful empire in ancient India, ruled by the Mauryan dynasty from 321 to 185 BCE. The Empire was founded in 322 BC by Chandragupta Maurya who rapidly expanded his power westwards across central and western India, taking advantage of the disruptions of local powers in the wake of the withdrawal westward by Alexander the Great. By 320 BCE, the empire had fully occupied past northwestern India as well as defeating and conquering the satraps left by Alexander. It has been estimated that the Maurya Dynasty controlled an unprecedented one-third of the world's entire economy, was home to one-third of the world's population at the time (an estimated 50 million out of 150 million humans), contained the world's largest city of the time (Pataliputra, estimated to be larger than Rome under Emperor Trajan) and according to Megasthenes, the empire wielded a military of 600,000 infantry, 30,000 cavalry, and 9,000 war elephants.
|
-
The Roman Empire under Trajan (98 - 117). This would be the Empire's peak territorial power.
-
|
The Roman Empire was the most extensive Western empire until the early modern period. Prior to the Roman Empire the kingdom of Macedonia, under Alexander the Great, became an empire that spanned from Greece to Northwestern India. After Alexander's death, his empire fractured into four, discrete kingdoms ruled by the Diadochi, which, despite being independent, are denoted as the "Hellenistic Empire" by virtue of their similarity in culture and administration.
In western Asia, the term Persian Empire denotes the Iranian imperial states established at different historical periods of pre–Islamic and post–Islamic Persia. And in East Asia, various Celestial Empires arose periodically between periods of war, civil war, and foreign conquests. In India Chandragupta expanded the Mauryan Empire to Northwest India (modern day Pakistan and Afghanistan). This also included the era of expansion of Buddhism under Ashoka the Great. In China the Han Empire became one of East Asia's most long lived dynasties, but was preceded by the short-lived Qin Empire.
The 7th century saw the emergence of the Islamic Empire, also referred to as the Arab Empire. The Rashidun Caliphate expanded from the Arabian Peninsula and swiftly conquered the Persian Empire and much of the Byzantine Roman Empire. Its successor state, the Umayyad Caliphate, expanded across North Africa and into the Iberian Peninsula. By the beginning of the 8th century, it had become the largest empire in history at that point, until it was eventually surpassed in size by the Mongol Empire in the 13th century. The ally of the Caliphate, the Somali Ajuuraan Empire, ruled over the Horn of Africa[5]. Through a strong centralized administration and an aggressive military stance towards invaders, the Ajuuraan empire successfully resisted an Oromo invasion from the west and a Portuguese incursion from the east during the Gaal Madow and the Ajuuraan-Portuguese wars.[6][7] Trading routes dating from the ancient and early medieval periods of Somali maritime enterprise were strengthened or re-established, and foreign trade and commerce in the coastal provinces flourished with ships sailing to and coming from a myriad of kingdoms and empires in East Asia, South Asia, Europe, the Near East, North Africa and East Africa[8]. In the 7th century, Maritime Southeast Asia witnessed the rise of a Buddhist thallasocracy—the Srivijaya Empire—which thrived for 600 years, and was succeeded by the Hindu-Buddhist Majapahit Empire in the 13th to 15th century. In the Southeast Asian mainland, the Hindu-Buddhist Khmer Empire built an empire centered in the city of Angkor and which flourished from the 9th to 13th century. In Eastern Europe the Byzantine Empire had to recognize the Imperial title of the Bulgarian rulers in 917 (through a Bulgarian Tsar). The Bulgarian Empire remained a major power in the Balkans until its fall in the late 14th century.
At the time, in the Medieval West, the title “empire” had a specific technical meaning that was exclusively applied to states that considered themselves the heirs and successors of the Roman Empire, e.g. the Byzantine Empire which was the actual continuation of the Eastern Roman Empire, and later the Carolingian Empire, the largely Germanic Holy Roman Empire, the Russian Empire, yet these states were not always technically — geographic, political, military — empires in the modern sense of the word. To legitimise their imperium, these states directly claimed the title of Empire from Rome. The sacrum Romanum imperium (Holy Roman Empire) of 800 to 1806, claimed to have exclusively comprehended Christian principalities, and was only nominally a discrete imperial state. The Holy Roman Empire was not always centrally-governed, as it had neither core nor peripheral territories, and was not governed by a central, politico-military élite — hence, Voltaire’s remark that the Holy Roman Empire “was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire” is accurate to the degree that it ignores[9] German rule over Italian, French, Provençal, Polish, Flemish, Dutch, and Bohemian populations, and the efforts of the ninth-century Holy Roman Emperors (i.e. the Ottonians) to establish central control; thus, Voltaire’s “. . . nor an empire” observation applies to its late period.
In 1204, after the Fourth Crusade sacked Constantinople, the crusaders established a Latin Empire (1204–1261) in that city, while the defeated Byzantine Empire’s descendants established two, smaller, short-lived empires in Asia Minor: the Empire of Nicaea (1204–1261) and the Empire of Trebizond (1204–1461). Constantinople was retaken by the Byzantine successor state centered in Nicaea in 1261, re-establishing the Byzantine Empire until 1453, by which time the Turkish-Muslim Ottoman Empire (ca.1300–1918), had conquered most of the region. Moreover, Eastern Orthodox imperialism was not re-established until the coronation, in 1721, of Peter the Great as Emperor of Russia. Like-wise, with the collapse of the Holy Roman Empire, in 1806, during the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), the Austrian Empire (1804–1867), emerged reconstituted as the Empire of Austria–Hungary (1867–1918), having “inherited” the imperium of Central and Western Europe from the losers of said wars.
The Mongol Empire, under Genghis Khan in the thirteenth century, was forged as the largest contiguous empire in the world. Genghis Khan's grandson, Kublai Khan, was proclaimed emperor, and established his imperial capital at Beijing; however, in his reign, the empire became fractured into four, discrete khanates. Nevertheless, the emergence of the Pax Mongolica had significantly eased trade and commerce across Asia.[10][11]
In Oceania Tonga Empire was a lonely empire that existed many centuries since Medieval till Modern period.
European landings in the so-called "New World" (first, the Americas and later, Australia) in the 15th century, along with the Portuguese's travels around the Cape of Good Hope and along the southeast Indian Ocean coast of Africa, proved ripe opportunities for the continent's Renaissance-era monarchies to launch colonial empires like those of the ancient Romans and Greeks. In the "Old World", colonial imperialism was attempted, effected and established upon the Canary Islands and Ireland. These conquered lands and peoples became de jure subordinates of the empire, rather than de facto imperial territory and subjects. Such subjugation often elicited “client-state” resentment that the empire unwisely ignored, leading to the collapse of the European colonial imperial system in the late-19th century and the early- and mid-20th century. Spanish discovery of the New World gave way to many expeditions led by England, Portugal, France, the Dutch Republic and Spain. In the 18th century, the Spanish Empire was at its height because of the great mass of goods taken from conquered territory in the Americas (Mexico, parts of the United States, the Caribbean) and the Philippines. During that period the biggest empire was Spain.
|
-
The red of this map of North America 1775, shows those areas the British exercised direct control, while the pink shows areas largely under indirect control.
-
|
|
|
In general governments styled themselves as having greater size, scope and power than the territorial, politico-military and economic facts allow. As a consequence some monarchs assumed the title of “emperor” (or its corresponding translation: tsar, empereur, kaiser, etc.) and renamed their states as “The Empire of . . . ”.
The French emperors Napoleon I and Napoleon III (See: Second Mexican Empire [1864–1867]) each attempted establishing a western imperial hegemony based in France. The German Empire (1871–1918), another “heir to the Holy Roman Empire” arose in 1871. Europeans began applying the name of “empire” to non-European monarchies, such as the Qing Dynasty and the Mughal Empire as well as Maratha Empire, and then leading, eventually, to the looser denotations applicable to any political structure meeting the criteria of imperium.
Empires accreted to different types of states, although they traditionally originated as powerful monarchies. The Athenian Empire, the Roman Empire and the British Empire developed under elective auspices. The Empire of Brazil declared itself an empire after breaking from the Portuguese Empire in 1822. France has twice transited from being called the French Republic to being called the French Empire, while France remained an overseas empire. To date it still governs colonies (French Guyana, Martinique, Réunion, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, St Martin, St pierre et miquelon, Guadeloupe, TAAF, Wallis and Futuna, Saint Barthélemy, Mayotte) and exerts an hegemony in Francophone Africa (29 francophone countries such as Chad, Rwanda, et cetera).
Historically empires resulted from military conquest, incorporating the vanquished states to its political union. A state could establish imperial hegemony in other ways. A weak state may seek annexation into the empire. For example, the bequest of Pergamon by Attalus III, to the Roman Empire. The Unification of Germany as the empire accreted to the Prussian metropole was less a military conquest of the German states than their political divorce from the Austrian Empire. Having convinced the other states of its military prowess — and having excluded the Austrians — Prussia dictated the terms of imperial membership.
The Sikh Empire (1799–1846) was established in the Punjab. It collapsed when the founder, Ranjit Singh, died and their army fell to the British. During the same period, Maratha Empire or the Maratha Confederacy was a Hindu state located in present-day India. It existed from 1674 to 1818 and at its peak the empire's territories covered much of South Asia. The empire was founded and consolidated by Shivaji. After the death of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb it expanded greatly under the rule of the Peshwas. In 1761, the Maratha army lost the Third Battle of Panipat which halted the expansion of the empire. Later, the empire was divided into a confederacy of Maratha states which eventually were lost to the British in the Anglo-Maratha wars by 1818.[13]
The British also established their first empire in North America by colonizing the northern part that included Canada and the colonies in America. In 1776, the United States declared itself independent from the British empire thus beginning the American Revolution.
Politically it was typical for either a monarchy or an oligarchy, rooted in the original core territory of the empire, to continue to dominate. If government was maintained via control of water vital to the colonial subjects, such régimes were called hydraulic empires. When possible, empires used a common religion or culture to strengthen the political structure.
In time, an empire may metamorphose to another form of polity. To wit, the Holy Roman Empire, a German re-constitution of the Roman Empire, metamorphosed into various political structures (i.e. Federalism), and eventually, under Habsburg rule, re-constituted itself as the Austrian Empire — an empire of much different politics and vaster extension. After the Second World War (1939–1945) the British Empire evolved into a loose, multi-national Commonwealth of Nations; while the French colonial empire metamorphosed to a Francophone commonwealth. The British Empire also colonized China after the opium wars and had major influences in the region via controlling Hong Kong, which was handed back to China in 1997 after 150 years of rule. The Portuguese established its colony in China and had control over the territory of Macau, which was also handed back to China in 1999. Also, the French established its colony in China and had control over the territory of Kwang-Chou-Wan, which was also handed back to China in 1946.
An autocratic empire can become a republic (e.g. the Central African Empire in 1979); or it can become a republic with its imperial dominions reduced to a core territory (e.g. Weimar Germany, 1918–1919 and the Ottoman Empire, 1918–1923). The dissolution of the Austro–Hungarian Empire, after 1918, is an example of a multi-ethnic superstate broken into its constituent states: the republics, kingdoms, and provinces of Austria, Hungary, Transylvania, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Czechoslovakia, Ruthenia, Galicia, et al.
Contemporaneously, the concept of Empire is politically valid, yet is not always used in the traditional sense; for example Japan is considered the world’s sole remaining empire because of the continued presence of the Japanese Emperor in national politics. Despite the semantic reference to Imperial power, Japan is a de facto constitutional monarchy, with a homogeneous population of 127 million people that is 98.5 per cent ethnic Japanese, making it one of the largest nation-states.[14]
Characterizing some aspects of American foreign policy and international behavior "American Empire" is controversial but not uncommon. Stuart Creighton Miller posits that the public's sense of innocence about Realpolitik (cf. American Exceptionalism) impairs popular recognition of US imperial conduct. Since it governed other countries via surrogates — domestically-weak, right-wing governments that collapse without US support.[15] G.W. Bush's Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said: “We don’t seek empires. We’re not imperialistic; we never have been”[16] — directly contradicts Thomas Jefferson, in the 1780s, awaiting the fall of the Spanish empire: “. . . till our population can be sufficiently advanced to gain it from them piece by piece”.[17][18][19] In turn, historian Sidney Lens argues that from its inception the US has used every means to dominate other nations.[20]
Since the European Union began, in 1993, as a west European trade bloc, it established its own currency, the Euro, in 1999, established discrete military forces, and exercised its limited hegemony in parts of eastern Europe and Asia. This behaviour, the political scientist Jan Zielonka suggests, is imperial, because it coerces its neighbour countries to adopt its European economic, legal, and political structures.[21][22][23][24][25][26]
In his book review of Empire (2000) by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Mehmet Akif Okur posits that, since the 11 September 2001, terrorist attacks in the U.S., the international relations determining the world’s balance of power (political, economic, military) have been altered. These alterations include the intellectual (political science) trends that perceive the contemporary world’s order via the re-territorrialisation of political space, the re-emergence of classical imperialist practices (the “inside” vs. “outside” duality, cf. the Other), the deliberate weakening of international organisations, the restructured international economy, economic nationalism, the expanded arming of most countries, the proliferation of nuclear weapon capabilities and the politics of identity emphasizing a state’s subjective perception of its place in the world, as a nation and as a civilisation. These changes constitute the “Age of Nation Empires”; as imperial usage, nation-empire denotes the return of geopolitical power from global power blocs to regional power blocs (i.e. centred upon a “regional power” state [China, Russia, U.S., et al.]) and regional multi-state power alliances (i.e. Europe, Latin America, South East Asia). Nation-empire regionalism claims sovereignty over their respective (regional) political (social, economic, ideologic), cultural and military spheres.[27]
The chart below shows a timeline of some Eurasian states claiming the imperial title. Dynastic changes are marked with a white line.
<timeline> ImageSize = width:1000 height:550 PlotArea = width:850 height:450 left:50 bottom:50
DateFormat = yyyy Period = from:-336 till:2009 TimeAxis = orientation:vertical ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:100 start:-300
- there is no automatic collision detection,
- so shift texts up or down manually to avoid overlap
Colors=
id:red value:red
Define $dx = 25 # shift text to right side of bar Define $dy = -5 # adjust height
PlotData=
bar:Alexandria color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:-336 till:-323 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar: China color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize: 7
from:-221 till: 1911 shift:($dx,-2) color: red
at:206 mark:(line,white)
at:220 mark:(line,white)
at:265 mark:(line,white)
at:280 mark:(line,white)
at:420 mark:(line,white)
at:589 mark:(line,white)
at:618 mark:(line,white)
at:907 mark:(line,white)
at:960 mark:(line,white)
at:907 mark:(line,white)
at:1125 mark:(line,white)
at:1279 mark:(line,white)
at:1271 mark:(line,white)
at:1368 mark:(line,white)
at:1644 mark:(line,white)
bar:Roman color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:-27 till:476 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
at:68 mark:(line,white)
at:69 mark:(line,white)
at:96 mark:(line,white)
at:192 mark:(line,white)
at:235 mark:(line,white)
at:284 mark:(line,white)
at:364 mark:(line,white)
at:392 mark:(line,white)
at:455 mark:(line,white)
bar:Mauryan color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:321 till:185 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:Byzantine color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:306 till:1204 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
at:363 mark:(line,white)
at:364 mark:(line,white)
at:457 mark:(line,white)
at:518 mark:(line,white)
at:602 mark:(line,white)
at:610 mark:(line,white)
at:711 mark:(line,white)
at:717 mark:(line,white)
at:803 mark:(line,white)
at:813 mark:(line,white)
at:820 mark:(line,white)
at:867 mark:(line,white)
at:1056 mark:(line,white)
at:1057 mark:(line,white)
at:1059 mark:(line,white)
at:1081 mark:(line,white)
at:1185 mark:(line,white)
from:1261 till:1453 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
bar:Bulgarian color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:913 till:1018 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
at:997 mark:(line,white)
at:1280 mark:(line,white)
at:1292 mark:(line,white)
at:1299 mark:(line,white)
at:1300 mark:(line,white)
at:1323 mark:(line,white)
from:1185 till:1422 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
bar:Holy-Rоman color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:962 till:1024 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
from:1027 till:1125 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1133 till:1137 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1155 till:1197 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1209 till:1215 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1220 till:1250 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1312 till:1313 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1328 till:1347 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1355 till:1378 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1433 till:1437 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1452 till:1740 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
from:1742 till:1806 shift:($dx,$dy) color:red
at:1745 mark:(line,white)
at:1765 mark:(line,white)
bar:Nicaea color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1204 till:1261 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:Latin color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1204 till:1261 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:Trebizond color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1204 till:1461 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:Ottoman color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1299 till:1922 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:Serbian color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1345 till:1371 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:Russian color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1480 till:1917 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
at:1598 mark:(line,white)
at:1605 mark:(line,white)
at:1606 mark:(line,white)
at:1610 mark:(line,white)
at:1612 mark:(line,white)
bar:Swedish color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1611 till:1718 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar: Maratha color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1647 till:1818 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:French color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1804 till:1814 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
at:1815 mark:(line,red)
from:1852 till:1870 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:Austrian color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1804 till:1918 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:German color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1871 till:1918 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
bar:British color:red width:25 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:7
from:1677 till:1998 shift:($dx,-2) color:red
at:1677 mark:(line,white)
at:1998 mark:(line,white)
</timeline>
- ^ "definition of empire from Oxford Dictionaries Online". Oxford Dictionary. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/empire?view=uk. Retrieved 21 November 2008.
- ^ Ross Hassig, Mexico and the Spanish Conquest (1994), pp. 23–24, ISBN 0-582-06829-0 (pbk)
- ^ The Oxford English Reference Dictionary, Second Edition (2001), p.461, ISBN 0-19-860046-1
- ^ Howe, Stephen (2002). Empire. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 15. ISBN 978-0-19-280223-1.
- ^ I.M. Lewis, A modern history of Somalia: nation and state in the Horn of Africa, 2nd edition, revised, illustrated, (Westview Press: 1988), p.24.
- ^ Virginia Luling, Somali Sultanate: the Geledi city-state over 150 years, p. 17
- ^ Luc Cambrézy, Populations réfugiées: de l'exil au retour, p.316
- ^ Horn and Crescent: Cultural Change and Traditional Islam on the East African Coast, 800–1900 (African Studies) by Pouwels Randall L – pg 15
- ^ Voltaire, Wikiquote, citing Essai sur l'histoire generale et sur les moeurs et l'espirit des nations, Chapter 70 (1756), http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Voltaire, retrieved 2008-01-06
- ^ Gregory G.Guzman - Were the barbarians a negative or positive factor in ancient and medieval history?, The historian 50 (1988), 568-70
- ^ Thomas T.Allsen - Culture and conquest in Mongol Eurasia, 211
- ^ "The East India Company and the British Empire in the Far East - Marguerite Eyer Wilbur, The East India Company - Google Books". Books.google.com.pk. http://books.google.com.pk/books?id=HTCsAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA175&lpg=PA175&dq=baharji+borah&source=bl&ots=AlYwMkBwb6&sig=KpQbE7bMcMILePXasygPjYd6Xkk&hl=en&ei=ahnNTtnqEOHb4QSUtZ1S&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=cape%20comorin&f=false. Retrieved 2012-04-29.
- ^ Pagadi, Setumadhavarao R. (1983), Shivaji, National Book Trust, India, p. 21, ISBN 81-237-0647-2, http://books.google.com/?id=UVFuAAAAMAAJ
- ^ George Hicks, Japan’s hidden apartheid: the Korean minority and the Japanese, (Aldershot, England; Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1998), 3.
- ^ Johnson, Chalmers, Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (2000), pp.72–9
- ^ Niall Ferguson, Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire, Lay summary
- ^ Sidney Lens; Howard Zinn (2003), The forging of the American empire: from the revolution to Vietnam, a history of U.S. imperialism, Pluto Press, pp. 63–64, ISBN 978-0-7453-2100-4, http://books.google.com/books?id=qvLfIHqkOOAC
- ^ LaFeber, Walter, Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America (1993) 2nd edition, p.19
- ^ Max Boot (May 6, 2003), American Imperialism? No Need to Run Away from Label, Council on Foreign Relations OP-Ed, quoting USA Today, http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=5934, retrieved 2008-01-06
- ^ Lens & Zinn 2003, p. Back cover.
- ^ Ian Black (December 20, 2002), Living in a euro wonderland, Guardian unlimited, http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,,863888,00.html, retrieved 2008-01-06
- ^ EU gets its military fist, BBC News, December 13, 2002, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2574625.stm, retrieved 2008-01-06
- ^ Nikolaos Tzifakis (April 2007), "EU's region-building and boundary-drawing policies: the European approach to the Southern Mediterranean and the Western Balkans 1", Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans (informaworld) 9 (1): 47–64, DOI:10.1080/14613190701217001, http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a777076388~db=all, retrieved 2007-01-06
- ^ Stephen R. Hurt (2003), "Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and acp states and the end of the Lomé Convention", Third World Quarterly (informaworld) 24: 161–176, DOI:10.1080/713701373, http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/index/HNG8A7X4G9BWAM84.pdf, retrieved 2007-01-06
- ^ Europeanisation and Conflict Resolution: Case Studies from the European Periphery, Belgian Science Policy, http://www.belspo.be/belspo/home/publ/pub_ostc/WM/rS10303_en.pdf, retrieved 2008-01-06
- ^ Jan Zielonka (2006), Europe as empire: the nature of the enlarged European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-929221-3, http://users.ox.ac.uk/~polf0040/IAReview.pdf, retrieved 2008-01-06
- ^ For the Okur's thesis about "nation empires", look at the article: Mehmet Akif Okur, Rethinking Empire After 9/11: Towards A New Ontological Image of World Order Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs, Volume XII, Winter 2007, pp.61-93
- Gilpin, Robert War and Change in World Politics pp. 110–116
- Geiss, Imanuel (1983), War and empire in the twentieth century, Aberdeen University Press, ISBN 0-08-030387-0
- Johan Galtung (January 1996), The Decline and Fall of Empires: A Theory of De-Development, Honolulu, archived from the original on 2007-10-13, http://web.archive.org/web/20071013085302/http://transcend.org/galt.htm, retrieved 2008-01-06 Written for the United Nations Research Institute on Development, UNRISD, Geneva.
- Lens, Sidney; Zinn, Howard (2003), The Forging of the American Empire: From the Revolution to Vietnam: A History of American Imperialism, Plkuto press, ISBN 0-7453-2100-3, http://books.google.com/?id=qvLfIHqkOOAC
- Bowden, Brett (2009), The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-06814-5