ASK A QUESTION
RECENT RESPONSES
CONCEPT CLOUD
- About the site
- Site diary
- AskPhilosophers Group
- AskPhilosophers Fund
- AskPhilosophers Books
- AskPhilosophers Mobile
- All (4401)
- Abortion (51)
- Animals (90)
- Art (85)
- Beauty (58)
- Biology (80)
- Business (55)
- Children (87)
- Color (36)
- Consciousness (41)
- Death (60)
- Education (173)
- Emotion (53)
- Environment (27)
- Ethics (987)
- Euthanasia (2)
- Existence (94)
- Feminism (55)
- Freedom (114)
- Gender (24)
- Happiness (61)
- History (15)
- Identity (63)
- Justice (189)
- Knowledge (209)
- Language (210)
- Law (58)
- Literature (33)
- Logic (266)
- Love (104)
- Mathematics (148)
- Medicine (50)
- Mind (214)
- Music (27)
- Perception (61)
- Philosophers (278)
- Philosophy (442)
- Physics (60)
- Probability (32)
- Profession (98)
- Punishment (42)
- Race (29)
- Rationality (87)
- Religion (289)
- Science (157)
- Sex (117)
- Space (23)
- Sport (28)
- Suicide (20)
- Time (80)
- Truth (45)
- Value (151)
- War (39)
- Panelist Login
What Should I Do? Philosophers on the Good, the Bad, and the Puzzling
Click here to order your copy!
What is AskPhilosophers? This site puts the talents and knowledge of philosophers at the service of the general public. Send in a question that you think might be related to philosophy and we will do our best to respond to it. To date, there have been 4401 questions posted and 5578 responses. [more]
Question of the day
In conversations with Christians (and members of other religious groups), more often than not I'm asked on what grounds atheism can claim to have an objective morality. This isn't a new question, but it is one I don't feel properly equipped to answer well. I think reason and our intuitions can aid us in finding objective moral truths, but I often find myself at a loss articulating a good defense. I do not find the theist's claim that morality depends on God's existence a good one, but I want to advance a better argument for why secular morality works out, and not just knock down their view. What's the general consensus among philosophers? Is there a firm foundation for morality without God?
RELATED SITES
| Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | |
| Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | |
| Early Modern Texts | |
| Some classics of early modern philosophy |
|
| THINK | |
| A periodical of the Royal Institute of Philosophy | |
| Philosophy Now | |
| A magazine of ideas | |
| The Philosophers' Magazine Online | |
| Philosophy from The Philosophers' Magazine | |
| Philosophy Talk | |
| Radio show, audio archives, blog |
|
| Public Ethics Radio | |
| Engages ethicists in discussion of pressing practical dilemmas. |
|
| High-Phi | |
| Supporting philosophical inquiry in American high schools | |
| Teaching Children Philosophy | |
| How to conduct philosophical discussions with elementary school children |
|
The literature on this topic is huge. Much of the work in theoretical ethics and metaethics in the last 200 years has been an attempt to provide a non-theistic foundation for morality, whether a foundation within ethics or a foundation outside ethics. If you look under "ethics," "metaethics," and "moral" in the table of contents of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (linked in the right sidebar of this site), you'll find dozens of entries that give non-theistic treatments of ethics and ethical issues. Two good recent journal articles on the non-theistic grounding of ethics are this one by Wes Morriston and this one by Erik Wielenberg. You might also find this forthcoming paper of mine to be relevant. Best of luck in your research!