Steve Bates/WakeUpToTheNWO2 made a video DEAN CLIFFORD: Rebel Without a CLUE (Full Film):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB9Fj...I responded with this post:"I'm impressed you lasted as you did. Dean is incorrect on all the points raised, though sometimes not for the reasons provided. You see Steve, your deconstruction itself contains several defects. Birth defects are one thing. Thinking defects quite another. I've made my share. I can cite sources, but I prefer when people do heir own research.Hu at the root means serpent or god. (In law, first in time, first in line. Saying an old definition is invalid because it has been superseded misses the point that it is the definition in use at the time of a Statute, Act, or Code which prevails for the cited case ONLY. But these legislated instruments, Man's law, are all inextricably steeped in fraud. And are copyrighted. Including law dictionaries, which are produced by friends of the Court, meaning willing participants in the fraud.)It is the root meaning that derogates the term human. Of incidental interest, hu(e)-man has been related to Colour of law, meaning Statute, which makes it a plausible but inconsequential relation. Further, in their law society, God created Man (meaning man and woman). Who created hu?All discussion of the person in any capacity is another red herring. The Bible is THEE Law book their society states it operates under. God is the issuer of the Law. It doesn't matter who accepts or rejects the Bible, or even whether the Bible is Satanic, which it can only be, but that's beside the point. Hold the fire to the fire. God is no respecter of persons.Rights. A right is a power inherent in one and incident upon another. In a strict sense it is a power over another, including the power to contract. It is a power for action and protection. A Right un-exercised is as nothing, which means that if one is free, one has no Rights for lack of need. No one is born with Rights except those presumed instilled by the Creator, which are what we say from using reason, so this can only go in circles. Bottom line, might makes right. Natural law ensures this.Dean went to jail, not because he doesn't use the Bill of Rights (correctly), or any other excuse. They throw people in jail whether there is lawful/legal cause. They throw people in simply because they still hold Title/TITLE in the Surname.The Government deals in Certificates - birth, marriage, death. I've spoken with men who have certificated and apostilled the decease of their legal person, or in one case, had it filed into the record at Court. The flesh lives on. You're in or you're out. Those people are out. Dean is in.Relying only on law dictionaries is problematic. From the etymology of country, we get the meaning the art of the count. It's all about finances, after all. Canada is just six letters twisted beyond recognition. Canada is a UK Colony. It was a Province from 1841 to 1867. Province means conquered territory. Its Colonial status was never legally revoked, and never became a Dominion because the BNA Act 1867 preamble was altered by the Colonial Office against the express will and without the knowledge of the local land barons, who of course did not represent the people anyway. If the document founding the Charter was a fraud, all derivative legislated instruments are fiat and ultra vires. Why discuss any of that bullshit apart from Dean discussing it with errors of understanding?The point about registering with the SEC is that only corporations are listed. The further point is that registration means to the king, and is a transfer of titular ownership.The Statute Law Revision Act 1893 had the effect upon Queen Victoria's death in 1901 of repealing Section II of the BNA Act 1867, which thereby stopped Her Heirs and Successors from inheriting the Crown. The Bank of England usurped the Crown. The Rothschilds. Again. Guess who set the Powder Lane fire that lead to the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666?The debt is a fiction. Nowhere in Canadian Statute will you find the principle definition of money. They define or interpret its proxies only. And the shortest Act ever passed by Parliament grants immunity to the BIS, the central bank of central banks. How about that? Those Swiss Nazi Templar are always up to mischief. Some Courts have pronounced that cash is money. Of course they will - Court exists to protect the owner's property, meaning in part collecting the debt notes in circulation. However, Bank of Montreal v Bank of Canada SCR 1978 states plainly as from the Bills of Exchange Act that only the promise to pay a sum certain in money is itself money.I'll stop with that."His response is in the video.

• published: 27 Apr 2014
• views: 11