Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Carbon pollution up to 2 million pounds a second

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The amount of heat-trapping pollution the world spewed rose again last year by 3 percent. So scientists say it's now unlikely that global warming can be limited to a couple of degrees, which is an international goal.

    The overwhelming majority of the increase was from China, the world's biggest carbon dioxide polluter. Of the planet's top 10 polluters, the United States and Germany were the only countries that reduced their carbon dioxide emissions.

    Last year, all the world's nations combined pumped nearly 38.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the air from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil, according to new international calculations on global emissions published Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change. That's about a billion tons more than the previous year.

    The total amounts to more than 2.4 million pounds (1.1 million kilograms) of carbon dioxide released into the air every second.

    Because emissions of the key greenhouse gas have been rising steadily and most carbon stays in the air for a century, it is not just unlikely but "rather optimistic" to think that the world can limit future temperature increases to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), said the study's lead author, Glen Peters at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, Norway.

    Three years ago, nearly 200 nations set the 2-degree C temperature goal in a nonbinding agreement. Negotiators now at a conference under way in Doha, Qatar, are trying to find ways to reach that target.

    The only way, Peters said, is to start reducing world emissions now and "throw everything we have at the problem."

    Andrew Weaver, a climate scientist at the University of Victoria in Canada who was not part of the study, said: "We are losing control of our ability to get a handle on the global warming problem."

    In 1997, most of the world agreed to an international treaty, known as the Kyoto Protocol, that required developed countries such as the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 5 percent when compared with the baseline year of 1990. But countries that are still developing, including China and India, were not limited by how much carbon dioxide they expelled. The United States never ratified the treaty.

    The latest pollution numbers, calculated by the Global Carbon Project, a joint venture of the Energy Department and the Norwegian Research Council, show that worldwide carbon dioxide levels are 54 percent higher than the 1990 baseline.

    The 2011 figures for the biggest polluters:

    1. China, up 10 percent to 10 billion tons.

    2. United States, down 2 percent to 5.9 billion tons

    3. India, up 7 percent to 2.5 billion tons.

    4. Russia, up 3 percent to 1.8 billion tons.

    5. Japan, up 0.4 percent to 1.3 billion tons.

    6. Germany, down 4 percent to 0.8 billion tons.

    7. Iran, up 2 percent to 0.7 billion tons.

    8. South Korea, up 4 percent to 0.6 billion tons.

    9. Canada, up 2 percent to 0.6 billion tons.

    10. South Africa, up 2 percent to 0.6 billion tons.

     

    2,409 comments

    • Joe  •  2 days 6 hrs ago
      Plant Trees.
    • CameronS  •  2 days 3 hrs ago
      We outsourced our co2 emission along with all those manufacturing jobs.
    • John  •  1 day 1 hr ago
      If China is the worst polluter then why does the U.S. keep importing crap made in China? I guess the U.S. doesn't really care. It's empty talk... blah, blah, blah.
      • Glowby 6 hrs ago
        Cameron - You're right. It's like slavery by proxy.
    • lonewolf  •  2 days 5 hrs ago
      The planet is fine. The PEOPLE are f***ed! - George Carlin
      • Andrew 4 hrs ago
        I am not conservative and George Carlin is great. Get off of your high horse and dont take life so damn seriously.
    • RickS  •  2 days 5 hrs ago
      Why is it the only way the pollution rate goes down is taxes?
    • nullator  •  2 days 4 hrs ago
      So the bad guys, the US are about the only ones that are down, while the ones who don't need to adhere to any standards, like China and India are up. So let's get tough on the US and move more industry to these countries.
      • Gabriel 1 day 5 hrs ago
        Don't Germany!
    • mixed  •  1 day 20 hrs ago
      We are #$%$ in our own fishbowl.
    • Truth Be Told  •  2 days 5 hrs ago
      China is a mess with severe overpopulation, they wear masks over their faces to breath!
      • Bryan Kampa 23 hrs ago
        They wear masks because they have terrible germ problems because of overpoppulation. Not because they cant breathe due to polution. They do it for hygenic reasons. Japan does it also. Learn the difference truthbetold
    • Bottom Feeding  •  2 days 7 hrs ago
      How many people are born every second?
      • Fcuk Maobama 1 day 1 hr ago
        At Matteb: "Gays are not the source of overpopulation? We are talking in the behind which surely yields brown offspring. any questions?
    • Chip  •  2 days 1 hr ago
      Okay! Who had thier thumb on the scales?
      • CURTIS 17 hrs ago
        The Author of this story makes life confusing, but he doesn't put his thumb on the scale, he just plays bait and switch a lot. The title talks about CARBON pollution, but the story goes on and on about CARBON DIOXIDE when it gets into weights and measures. Carbon has an atomic mass of about 12 and carbon dioxide has a molecular mass of almost 44. In terms of carbon dioxide the numbers will look almost 3.6 times larger than the exact same pollution if enumerated in tons of carbon. So which is it?

        Here is some math from the title, which is: "Carbon pollution up to 2 million pounds a second". OK to get a per capita carbon contribution score we divide amount of carbon by the population of the Earth. Two million pounds is a nice round number so I am going to use 7 billion people for the population of the Earth, although I am pretty certain that number is not current. So 2 million divide by 7 billion gives us about .000286 pound per person per second of carbon pollution. That is not a very meaningful number so how about we calculate the amount of carbon per person per day? We take .000286 lbs/person/second and multiply that by ...
        60 seconds per minute...
        times 60 minutes per hour...
        times 24 hours per day.
        Right off the top of my head, I think that comes out to about 25 pound of carbon per person per day. Now that is some thing to think about.
    • Powerboat Guy  •  2 days 5 hrs ago
      I'm sure the limos, the private jets, the bloated caviar eating delegates and prostitutes gathering for the conference helped reduce carbon output! lol
    • 3FL  •  1 day 3 hrs ago
      Do you really think that China and India really care about their carbon emission?
    • john  •  2 days 6 hrs ago
      I'd like a couple of tons of it to feed my pot plants.
    • The_Moondog  •  1 day 5 hrs ago
      The only thing rising faster is the US debt.
    • NHL  •  2 days 4 hrs ago
      Years ago when I heard clowns talking about China & India being "markets" I knew we were in big trouble. I always said when 1 billion Chinese leave their bikes behind & start driving the world was DOA. It is only a matter of time now.
    • Frank  •  2 days 5 hrs ago
      Joe is right plant trees. All the buring of the tropical forests and wood stoves account for 12% of carbon emissions. By increasing the numbers of fast growing trees you can lock up hugh amounts of carbon for centuries .That wood can be a source of energy in the future when oil run out.
    • Ballwreck Yomama  •  2 days 6 hrs ago
      I am old. My sequestered carbon is about to be released.
    • Michael M  •  1 day 12 hrs ago
      Many are claiming US reduction in the emission of greenhouse gas directly correlates to the timing of outsourcing US work and closing US factory's due to that outsourcing. Coincidence or skeptics smoke & mirrors?
    • Mike  •  1 day 0 hrs ago
      This article implies that the only thing affecting variations in global temperature is CO2.
    • Bangmaiknee  •  9 hrs ago
      where does all that weight goes? A ton of is a ton
    • NY trader charged in Conn. with $1B Apple scheme

      A trader from New York has been charged in a scheme that involved the unauthorized purchase of about $1 billion of Apple stock that wound up costing his Connecticut-based employer $5 million, federal prosecutors ...

    • Dancing With The Stars Sets Season 16 Premiere Date
      Dancing With The Stars Sets Season 16 Premiere Date

      It only ended a week ago when Melissa Rycroft and Tony Dovolani were crowned "Dancing with the Stars: All-Stars" champs, but another season of the celeb ballroom competition is already on the way.

    • Anne Hathaway Reveals Shame Over Stress to Be Thin

      Anne Hathaway grins on the latest issue of Glamour, beaming in a pair of hot pants and a tank top. But in an interview with the magazine, the “Les Mis” star revealed that her obsession with being thin is a source of “shame” and said...

    • Lincoln brand changes name as new MKZ goes on sale
      Lincoln brand changes name as new MKZ goes on sale

      Lincoln is getting a new car and a new name designed to reverse 20 years of falling sales.

    • The disturbing New York Post photo of a man about to be crushed by a subway train
      The disturbing New York Post photo of a man about to be crushed by a subway train

      Aghast commentators insist the photographer should have dropped his camera and helpedIt's a New Yorker's worst nightmare: A reportedly disturbed panhandler shoved a subway commuter, 58-year-old Ki Suk Han, onto the tracks, where he was crushed to death by an oncoming train. The story was splashed on the front page of today's New York Post, which featured a chilling image of Ki seemingly paralyzed as he watches the train barrel toward him. "DOOMED," blared the headline, with the accompanying text: "Pushed on the subway track, this man is about to die. ...

    • Facebook just realized it made a horrible mistake
      Facebook just realized it made a horrible mistake

      Facebook (FB) announced on Tuesday that it will begin opening Facebook Messenger to consumers who do not have a Facebook account, starting in countries like India and South Africa, and later rolling out the service in the United States and Europe. This is a belated acknowledgement of a staggering strategic mistake Facebook made two years ago. That is when the messaging app competition was still wide open and giants like Facebook or Google (GOOG) could have entered the competition. WhatsApp, the leading messaging app firm, had just 1 million users as late as December 2009. By the end of 2010, that number had grown to 10 million. Right now, it likely tops 200 million, though there is no current official number

    • Widow: Fought with husband before NY subway push
      Widow: Fought with husband before NY subway push

      The wife of a New York City man who was pushed onto subway tracks to his death by a mumbling stranger says she and her husband had argued before the tragedy.

    • Hugh Hefner, fiancee obtain marriage license
      Hugh Hefner, fiancee obtain marriage license

      Hugh Hefner and Crystal Harris are again taking steps toward the altar, more than a year after the centerfold canceled their previous engagement and was branded a "runaway bride" in Playboy.

    Follow Yahoo! News