40:42
The Role of the Federal Election Commission - Melanie Sloan Answers Questions on C-SPAN
Why is the Federal Election Commission, the agency charged with enforcing campaign finance...
published: 07 Feb 2012
Author: citizensforethics
The Role of the Federal Election Commission - Melanie Sloan Answers Questions on C-SPAN
Why is the Federal Election Commission, the agency charged with enforcing campaign finance law, so dysfunctional? Melanie Sloan, CREW Executive Director, answers that question and others regarding the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, as well as SuperPACs. Learn more: www.fixthefec.org http
5:30
What's Wrong with the Federal Election Commission? - Melanie Sloan
What's wrong with the Federal Election Commission? Melanie Sloan explains why the the ...
published: 30 Jan 2012
Author: citizensforethics
What's Wrong with the Federal Election Commission? - Melanie Sloan
What's wrong with the Federal Election Commission? Melanie Sloan explains why the the agency charged with policing our campaign finance laws is so dysfunctional and lays out immediate steps that can be taken to make it a more effective regulatory commission. Join in our efforts by signing our petition to President Obama urging him to fix the FEC. www.fixthefec.org This clip is taken from a panel discussion on 'Money and Politics in 2012' at the Center for American Progress on January 23rd, 2012.
1:30
Stephen Colbert files with the Federal Election Commission
Comedy Central's Stephen Colbert appeared at Federal Election Commission headquarters ...
published: 16 May 2011
Author: citizensforethics
Stephen Colbert files with the Federal Election Commission
Comedy Central's Stephen Colbert appeared at Federal Election Commission headquarters to formally request an advisory opinion on behalf of "Colbert Super PAC", his proposed political action committee. 5.13.2011
10:16
Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission- With Credits
A video explaining the Supreme Court Case Citizens United v. FEC and the impact it has had...
published: 22 Apr 2011
Author: figsk8ergirl
Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission- With Credits
A video explaining the Supreme Court Case Citizens United v. FEC and the impact it has had on campaigns.
7:39
CA Lawmakers Calling For Constitutional Convention - Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski
"California Assemblyman Michael Allen (D-Sonoma County), Assemblyman Mike Gatto (D-Lo...
published: 05 Apr 2012
Author: TYTInterviews
CA Lawmakers Calling For Constitutional Convention - Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski
"California Assemblyman Michael Allen (D-Sonoma County), Assemblyman Mike Gatto (D-Los Angeles), and Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont) have introduced Assembly Joint Resolution (AJR) 32, a measure that begins the process to amend the United States Constitution to nullify the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission." Cenk Uygur talks to California Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont) about this important legislation that fights back against Citizen's United. Read more here: californianewswire.com asmdc.org Support Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski here asmdc.org The best antidote to corporate corruption is direct democracy. www.wolf-pac.com
6:14
Stephen Colbert at the Federal Election Commission
Stephen Colbert stopped by Washington yesterday to file his SuperPAC with the FEC....
published: 13 May 2011
Author: ThinkProgressVideo
Stephen Colbert at the Federal Election Commission
Stephen Colbert stopped by Washington yesterday to file his SuperPAC with the FEC.
4:32
Your Boss Can Tell You To Campaign for Todd Akin - or You're Fired!
So, next time you're in a job interview - and you get to the end of it, and the interv...
published: 28 Aug 2012
Author: TheBigPictureRT
Your Boss Can Tell You To Campaign for Todd Akin - or You're Fired!
So, next time you're in a job interview - and you get to the end of it, and the interviewer asks if you have any questions for him or her about the company - here's what you should probably think about asking: "What are your company's politics?" That might sound like an odd question - and maybe not the sort of impression you want to make in a job interview - but it could save you a lot of problems farther down the road. That's because - according to a group of commissioners on the Federal Election Commission - corporations - your employers - can force you to campaign for certain politicians - whether you like it or not. They can even fire you if you choose not to. In other words - a corporation can force you to spend your day phone-banking for - say, Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin. Or canvassing around the neighborhood for...I don't know...Michele Bachmann. Or standing on the side of the street with a sign telling people to vote for David Duke! Now I know this sounds crazy. Don't we as employees have a right to be free from coercion in the workplace - especially when that coercion pertains to our personally held political beliefs? You would think so - but not anymore in this post-Citizens United world. Now - the rights of corporations - like the right to use their employees as cogs in their corporate political speech machine - trump your rights as an individual in the workplace - a corporations right to free speech has become more important than your right to free <b>...</b>
11:31
Keith Olbermann on on "Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission"
www.michaelmoore.com Today, the Supreme Court, of Chief Justice John Roberts, in a decisio...
published: 22 Jan 2010
Author: mmflint
Keith Olbermann on on "Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission"
www.michaelmoore.com Today, the Supreme Court, of Chief Justice John Roberts, in a decision that might actually have more dire implications than "Dred Scott v Sandford," declared that because of the alchemy of its 19th Century predecessors in deciding that corporations had all the rights of people, any restrictions on how these corporate-beings spend their money on political advertising, are unconstitutional. In short, the first amendment — free speech for persons — which went into affect in 1791, applies to corporations, which were not recognized as the equivalents of persons until 1886. In short, there are now no checks on the ability of corporations or unions or other giant aggregations of power to decide our elections. None. They can spend all the money they want. And if they can spend all the money they want — sooner, rather than later — they will implant the legislators of their choice in every office from President to head of the Visiting Nurse Service. ... Brushing up on how you amend the constitution at www.michaelmoore.com
5:48
Citizens United (Hillary: the Movie) v. Federal Election Commission
The so-called Citizens United case offers the Supreme Court a chance to severely curtail t...
published: 01 May 2009
Author: catoinstitutevideo
Citizens United (Hillary: the Movie) v. Federal Election Commission
The so-called Citizens United case offers the Supreme Court a chance to severely curtail the free speech abuses of the Federal Election Commission. John Samples, Director of the Cato Institute's Center for Representative Government, Institute for Justice Senior Attorney Steve Simpson and George Mason University law professor Allison Hayward weigh in. This video was produced by Austin Bragg ( www.twitter.com ) and Caleb Brown ( www.twitter.com ).
55:00
RATLIFF 35/2012 Press Conference
Press Secretary Langan Kingsley and Presidential Candidate Connor Ratliff (Age 36) address...
published: 04 Jul 2012
Author: 35ratliff2012
RATLIFF 35/2012 Press Conference
Press Secretary Langan Kingsley and Presidential Candidate Connor Ratliff (Age 36) address reporters in New York City's historic Battery Park. Among the many topics addressed: his age (36), the FEC (Federal Election Commission), the television show Murphy Brown, and how to purchase campaign merchandise. Fired pollster Will Hines attempts to ruin everything by showing up and being bitter and resentful.
87:22
Beyond Sticker Shock: How Is Big Money Changing Politics in 2012?
Beyond Sticker Shock: How Is Big Money Changing Politics in 2012? The 2012 election season...
published: 03 Oct 2012
Author: NewAmericaFoundation
Beyond Sticker Shock: How Is Big Money Changing Politics in 2012?
Beyond Sticker Shock: How Is Big Money Changing Politics in 2012? The 2012 election season is the priciest in history. That is partly a result of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, a 2010 Supreme Court decision that gave corporations and unions the ability to spend unlimited money to elect a candidate. But there's more to the money story than Citizens United, and the unprecedented amount of cash donors are pouring into the race. On October 2, join New America for an event that looks beyond the big numbers. Trevor Potter, a campaign and election lawyer known for illuminating campaign finance law on The Colbert Report, will join Roosevelt Institute Senior Fellow and New America Senior Research Fellow Mark Schmitt, TIME Magazine White House Correspondent Michael Scherer and New America Fellow Katherine Mangu-Ward for a conversation about the changing effects and impact of political money in 2012. How are big donations shifting the power dynamic between candidates and parties? Are corporations becoming more partisan? How large of an impact do big donors have on the campaign? Does money have a greater effect on election outcomes when it's spent in such large amounts? Our panel will address these questions and explore the implications for this election cycle and for presidential campaigns in the future. Participants Featuring: Trevor Potter Founding President and General Counsel, Campaign Legal Center Michael Scherer White House Correspondent , TIME Magazine Mark <b>...</b>
3:59
Senate Hearing on Citizens United
Sign the petition to keep corporate money and secret cash out of our elections by visiting...
published: 10 Aug 2012
Author: PublicCitizen
Senate Hearing on Citizens United
Sign the petition to keep corporate money and secret cash out of our elections by visiting democracyisforpeople.org A recent Supreme Court decision threatens the very foundations of our democracy. By opening the floodgates to corporate spending in our elections, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission gives corporations and the mega-wealthy a disproportionate amount of political influence. As 2012 campaign spending shoots to unprecedented heights, the interests of average Americans are being drowned out by non-stop negative ads and manipulative robo-calls. A democracy for sale is not a real democracy. Fortunately, the work of nearly 2 million grassroots activists is paying off as the US Senate held a hearing to consider a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. This footage is from that hearing. We hope you enjoy it and are inspired to join the fight to take back our democracy. For more info please visit: www.DemocracyIsForPeople.org and United4ThePeople.org. Follow @RuleByUs and use and follow the hashtag #Democracy4Sale to help put a spotlight on the need for an amendment. And, like us here: www.facebook.com/DemocracyIsForPeople. Music by Dev Iyer Video Design by Neil Heckman
1:30
Republicans prepare recount fund
The Republican National Committee has allocated more than five million dollars for use aft...
published: 04 Oct 2012
Author: RTAmerica
Republicans prepare recount fund
The Republican National Committee has allocated more than five million dollars for use after Election Day, and the money will be dedicated to recount efforts in close races. Federal Election Commission fillings show the RNC has the money in donations for use after November's big day. The RNC is wise to save the money considering how many important races come within a few hundred votes of one or another. RT's Kristine Frazao explains. Like us and/or follow us: twitter.com www.facebook.com
9:32
Trevor Potter on Fighting Back Against Big Money in the 2012 Election
Few understand the ways money moves in and out of our political system than campaign finan...
published: 21 Sep 2012
Author: MoyersandCompany
Trevor Potter on Fighting Back Against Big Money in the 2012 Election
Few understand the ways money moves in and out of our political system than campaign finance reform advocate Trevor Potter. A former chairman of the Federal Election Commission and founding president of the Campaign Legal Center, Potter was Stephen Colbert's chief advisor when Colbert formed his own super PAC and 501 (c)(4) in a clever effort to expose the potential for chicanery behind each. Here, Bill Moyers and Potter discuss how American elections are bought and sold, who covers the cost, and how the rest of us pay the price. "I can assure you that if someone is spending millions of dollars to elect the candidate, the candidate knows where that money is coming from. There's nothing illegal about telling them, but the voters aren't going to know that," Potter tells Bill. "We're creating opportunities for corruption and candidates being beholden to specific private interests because of funding, yet there's no disclosure to the rest of us."
Vimeo results:
56:46
Moyers & Company Show 137: Elections for Sale
One of the reasons Moyers & Company frequently returns to the theme of money and politics ...
published: 21 Sep 2012
Author: BillMoyers.com
Moyers & Company Show 137: Elections for Sale
One of the reasons Moyers & Company frequently returns to the theme of money and politics is because it’s absolutely necessary to do so. Nothing corrupts our political system more than the ability of the rich and influential to spend limitless amounts of money -- often in secret -- with the intention of creating preferred political outcomes. And far from being a regulator of campaign finances, our political funding laws -- aided by a corporate-friendly Supreme Court and self-interested politicians -- only facilitate the process of empowering the few while subjugating the many.
Few understand the ways money moves in and out of our political system than campaign finance reform advocate Trevor Potter. A former chairman of the Federal Election Commission and founding president of the Campaign Legal Center, Potter was Stephen Colbert’s chief advisor when Colbert formed his own super PAC and 501 (c)(4) in a clever effort to expose the potential for chicanery behind each.
Bill and Potter discuss how American elections are bought and sold, who covers the cost, and how the rest of us pay the price.
Also on the show, a Bill Moyers Essay on the bags of money that campaigns drop on consultants and TV ads to affect and distort your point of view.
15:54
Larry Halloran on HB2372 interview on KAKE
What we DIDN't see... the good stuff hit the cutting room floor so they could EMPHASIZE "t...
published: 16 Mar 2011
Author: Bob Bowser
Larry Halloran on HB2372 interview on KAKE
What we DIDN't see... the good stuff hit the cutting room floor so they could EMPHASIZE "the color of one's skin" which is NO where to be found in the Bill.
www.kslegislature.org/li/b2011_12/year1/measures/hb2372/
Larry's Testimony in Support of HB 2372
Testimony of Larry Halloran in support of HB 2372;
Chairman Kinzer and Members of the House Judiciary Committee,
We ask for your support of HB 2372; An Act concerning immigration; requiring verification of employment eligibility and making other amendments concerning immigration.
The fundamental question today is not illegal immigration itself. If we are a nation of laws and are faithful to our obligations as citizens or legislators then we will rightfully conclude that the rule of law is the bedrock foundation of our society and passage of this legislation should require little debate.
I would not dispute that employer and citizen alike have found the blind eye beneficial to their pocket book but financial gain, open borders or humanitarian compassion are not acceptable substitutes for the rule of law. Yesterdays benefit (however perceived) is today's liability as our citizens find themselves struggling to meet the increased burden of illegal immigration on our society that cannot be measured in financial terms alone.
The blessings and benefits of America are bountiful. But, if they are to be preserved for our posterity and those seeking the benefit of citizenship they must be secured by principled adherence to our state and federal Constitutions.
Illegal immigration is a festering cancer that damages both our society and those unlawfully seeking employment. It creates the necessity for a second society operating under the radar that inhibits the necessary assimilation of new immigrants into the America family. We are no longer concerned with a few thousand illegal immigrants that could be easily absorbed but rather tens of millions that now tax the limits of our social networks. It is past time for the half measured approaches, nod and wink policies and felonious excuses of citizen, employer and legislator alike related to the employment eligibility of illegal immigrants are put to rest. It is time that a lawful approach to employment eligibility verification becomes the rule for all employers and the accepted social norm for all citizens. Of even greater importance is that you, the citizen legislator, honor your oath of office and uphold the rule of law.
Our Founders studied the laws and customs of many nations (both failed and existing) and took from them guidance for our Constitution that best protected a free people and society. For over 200 years, our Constitution has served as the legal binder for our citizens and those wishing to assimilate into a free society. Today, many seek to dilute the authority of our Constitution through substitution of unlawful privileges that in essence establish an equal but separate society within our borders. A society that stands in stark contrast and in opposition to the fundamental necessity of assimilation at the expense of individual liberties guaranteed to all by our Constitution. Such practices serve to disadvantage the citizens and legal immigrants that play by the rules and adhere to our laws by granting unearned favor to the illegal immigrant.
Surely, we are all aware of the inequities, consequences and unquestionable failures of equal but separate jurisprudence practiced at times within our own society. To turn a blind eye or foster such practices is treasonous to our founding principles, documents and the faith of those who gave all to defend and preserve the greatest grant of freedom ever known to man; America.
The challenges before us in preserving the free society and America are indeed great but do include a provision for national suicide. Tolerance does not beget equal but separate in a free society but instead requires assimilation through shared core values and equal application of the laws
Thank you for your favorable support of HB 2372, your service and the defense of freedom for all.
Respectfully,
Larry Halloran, Chairman
Wichita - South Central KS 912 Group
Mulvane, KS 67110
Testimony of Lana Reed in Support of HB 2372
Testimony
Of
Lana Reed
Provided Pursuant to
K.S.A. 75-2973
Kansas Whistleblower Act
On The
HB 2372
Before the
House Judiciary Committee
"Under the current SRS system Kansas taxpayers are having millions of dollars stolen from them through fraud. Perhaps worse Kansas citizens, who are footing the bill, are being denied benefits that illegal aliens are approved for. The SRS system works for the illegal aliens and the illegal aliens know how to work the system...."
p.12
Representative Lance Kinzer, Chairman
Thursday, March 10, 2011, 3:30 p.m.
785-296-7692
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.
Fraud in the Kansas SRS System..
Hiding Illegal Aliens and Fraud.
Types of Fraud.
Fake Documents.
Legitimate SSNs.
Multiple Identities.
Living the Goo
23:47
Police attack Algonquin families at peaceful blockade of highway 117 in northern Quebec
For more information, visit:
http://barrierelakesolidarity.blogspot.com/
--
Canada and ...
published: 08 Oct 2008
Author: Barriere Lake Solidarity
Police attack Algonquin families at peaceful blockade of highway 117 in northern Quebec
For more information, visit:
http://barrierelakesolidarity.blogspot.com/
--
Canada and Quebec use riot police, tear gas, and "pain compliance" on peaceful Algonquin families to avoid negotiations
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, October, 7, 2008
Canada and Quebec use riot police, tear gas, and "pain compliance" on peaceful Algonquin families to avoid negotiations: 'pain compliance' perfect description of Conservative's aboriginal policy, say community spokespeople
Photos:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31135244@N07/
Kitiganik/Rapid Lake, Algonquin Territory -- Yesterday afternoon, the Conservative government and Quebec used riot police, tear gas, and "pain compliance" techniques to end a peaceful blockade erected by Algonquin families from Barriere Lake, rather than negotiate, as requested by the community. The blockade on Highway 117 in Northern Quebec began at 6:00am Monday, with nearly a hundred community members of all ages and their supporters promising to remain until Canada's Conservative government and Quebec honoured signed agreements and Barriere Lake's leadership customs. Around 4pm, nearly sixty Quebec officers and riot police encircled families after a meal and without warning launched tear gas canisters, one of which hit a child in the chest.
"Our demands are reasonable," said Norman Matchewan, a spokesperson who was racially slurred by Minister Lawrence Cannon's assistant earlier in the election. "We're only asking for the government to uphold the agreements they've signed and to stop illegally interfering in our customary governance. The message we've received today is that Stephen Harper and Jean Charest are unwilling to even play by their rules."
"We will not tolerate these brutal violations of our rights," added Matchewan. "Forestry operations will not be allowed on our Trilateral agreement territory, and we will be doing more non-violent direct action."
Nine people, including an elderly women, a pregnant woman, and two minors, were roughly arrested. While a line of police obscured the view of human rights observers from Christian Peacemaker Teams, officers used severe "pain compliance" techniques on protestors who had secured themselves to concrete-filled barrels, twisting arms, dislocating jaws, leaving them with bruised faces and trouble swallowing.
"In this election alone, the Conservatives have labelled us alcoholics and vilified our community's majority as "dissidents," said Michel Thusky, another community spokesperson, referring to an op-ed published by Minister Lawrence Cannon in regional newspapers. "Now they and Quebec have chosen violence over meeting their most basic obligations to our community. 'Pain compliance' is the perfect description of the Conservative government's aboriginal policies."
Barriere Lake community members had promised to maintain the blockade until the Government of Canada honoured the 1991 Trilateral agreement, a landmark sustainable development and resource co-management agreement praised by the United Nations and the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. To end federal interference in their leadership customs, they wanted the Government of Canada to appoint observers to witness a leadership reselection according to their codified customary selection code, respect its outcome, and then cease interfering in their internal governance.
- 30 -
59:46
Road Back to the Frozen Four (69 minutes)
History
[edit]Partridge and his academy
The university was founded in 1819 at Norwich by ...
published: 06 May 2011
Author: Norwich Television
Road Back to the Frozen Four (69 minutes)
History
[edit]Partridge and his academy
The university was founded in 1819 at Norwich by military educator and former superintendent of West Point, Captain Alden B. Partridge. Captain Partridge believed in the "American System of Education," a traditional liberal arts curriculum with instruction in civil engineering and military science. After leaving West Point because of congressional disapproval of his system, he returned to his native state of Vermont to create the American Literary, Scientific and Military Academy. Captain Partridge, in founding his academy, rebelled against the reforms of Sylvanus Thayer to prevent the rise of what he saw as the greatest threat to the security of the young republic: a professional officer class. He believed that a well-trained militia was an urgent necessity and developed the American system around that idea. His academy became the inspiration for a number of military colleges throughout the nation, including both the Virginia Military Institute and The Citadel, and later the land grant colleges created through the Morrill Act of 1862.[4]
Partridge's educational beliefs were considered radical at the time, and this led to his conflicting views with the federal government while he was the superintendent of West Point. Upon creation of his own school, he immediately incorporated classes of agriculture and modern languages in addition to the sciences, liberal arts, and various military subjects. Field exercises, for which Partridge borrowed cannon and muskets from the federal and state governments, supplemented classroom instruction and added an element of realism to the college’s program of well-rounded military education.
Partridge founded six other military institutions during his quest to reform the fledgling United States military. They were the Virginia Literary, Scientific and Military Academy at Portsmouth, Virginia (1839–1846), Pennsylvania Literary, Scientific, and Military Academy at Bristol, Pennsylvania (1842–1845), Pennsylvania Military Institute at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (1845–1848), Wilmington Literary, Scientific and Military Academy at Wilmington, Delaware (1846–1848), the Scientific and Military Collegiate Institute at Reading, Pennsylvania (1850–1854), Gymnasium and Military Institute at Pembroke, New Hampshire (1850–1853) and the National Scientific and Military Academy at Brandywine Springs, Delaware (1853).[5]
[edit]Fire and hardship: Norwich in the 19th century
In 1825 the academy moved to Middletown, Connecticut, to provide better naval training to the school's growing corps of cadets. In 1829, the state of Connecticut declined to grant Captain Partridge a charter and he moved the school back to Norwich (the Middletown campus became Wesleyan University in 1831). Beginning in 1826, the college offered the first program of courses in civil engineering in the US. In 1834 Vermont granted a charter and recognized the institution as Norwich University. During the 1856 academic year, the first chapter of the Theta Chi Fraternity was founded by cadets Frederick Norton Freeman and Arthur Chase. With the beginning of the Civil War in 1861, Norwich cadets served as instructors of the state militias throughout the Northeast and the entire class of 1862 enlisted upon its graduation. Norwich turned out hundreds of officers and soldiers who served with the federal armies in the American Civil War, including four recipients of the Medal of Honor. One graduate led a corps, seven more headed divisions, 21 commanded brigades, 38 led regiments, and various alumni served in 131 different regimental organizations. In addition, these men were eyewitnesses to some of the war's most dramatic events, including the bloodiest day of the conflict at Antietam, the attack up Marye's Heights at Fredericksburg, and the repulse of Pickett's Charge at Gettysburg. Seven hundred and fifty Norwich men served in the Civil War, of whom sixty fought for the Confederacy.[6] Because of the university's participation in the struggle, the number of students dwindled to seven in the class of 1864 alone.
The Confederate raid on St. Albans, Vermont precipitated fear that Newport, Vermont was an imminent target. The corps quickly boarded an express train for Newport, the same day, October 19, 1864, to the great relief of the inhabitants.
After a catastrophic fire in 1866 which devastated the entire campus, the town of Northfield welcomed the struggling school. The Civil War, the fire, and the uncertainty regarding the continuation of the University seriously lowered the attendance, and the school opened in the fall of 1866 with only 19 students. The 1870s and 1880s saw many financially turbulent times for the institution and the renaming of the school to Lewis College in 1880. In 1881 the student body was reduced to only a dozen men. Later, by 1884, the Vermont Legislature had the name of the school changed back to Norwich. In 1898 the university was designated as the Military
Youtube results:
5:17
Are Super PACs Good for Democracy?
What exactly is a Super PAC? Professor Bradley Smith, the former Commissioner of the Feder...
published: 08 Oct 2012
Author: LearnLiberty
Are Super PACs Good for Democracy?
What exactly is a Super PAC? Professor Bradley Smith, the former Commissioner of the Federal Election Commission, brings some clarity to these controversial groups by taking a close look at Super PACs: what they do and how they impact elections. In the video, Professor Smith asserts that many of the alleged harms caused by Super PACs are based on misconceptions. According to Smith: "far from being the death knell for democracy, Super PACs have been a positive development." Do you agree? Are Super PACs really good for democracy? Leave your thoughts in the comments!
8:08
Political Fundraising Post-Citizens United
When the Supreme Court upheld the Citizens United case, the government no longer could pro...
published: 21 Sep 2012
Author: PBSNewsHour
Political Fundraising Post-Citizens United
When the Supreme Court upheld the Citizens United case, the government no longer could prohibit or restrict independent political expenditures by corporations. Judy Woodruff talks to The Atlantic's James Bennet and the Washington Post's Ann Gerhart for more on how political fundraising has evolved this election cycle.
26:49
Austin Petersen on Russia Today - Romney/Ryan - Voter ID - Citizens United
Libertarian Austin Petersen, Director of Production at FreedomWorks, CEO of Stonegait Pict...
published: 01 Sep 2012
Author: Austin Petersen
Austin Petersen on Russia Today - Romney/Ryan - Voter ID - Citizens United
Libertarian Austin Petersen, Director of Production at FreedomWorks, CEO of Stonegait Pictures debates a panel on the biggest issues of the 2012 election.
12:59
Jeffrey Toobin: Office Hours with Google Play
New Yorker writer and bestselling author Jeffrey Toobin joins Google Play to discuss The O...
published: 27 Sep 2012
Author: googleplay
Jeffrey Toobin: Office Hours with Google Play
New Yorker writer and bestselling author Jeffrey Toobin joins Google Play to discuss The Oath--what he describes as "a broader story of the evolution of the Republican party." Hear what he has to say on activist judges, Citizens United, and the rights of corporations. Read The Oath and more by Jeffrey Toobin on Google Play: goo.gl Subscribe: goo.gl