Stained glass window of the Confession of Peter in Luke 9:20: "But who do you say that I am?" Peter answered: "The Christ of God".^[1]

Christology (from Greek Χριστός Khristós and -λογία, -logia) is the field of study within Christian theology which is primarily concerned with the nature and person of Jesus Christ as recorded in the canonical Gospels and the epistles of the New Testament.^[2] Primary considerations include the relationship of Jesus' nature and person with the nature and person of God the Father. As such, Christology is concerned with the details of Jesus' ministry, his acts and teachings, to arrive at a clearer understanding of who he is in his person, and his role in salvation.^[3]

A major component of the Christology of the Apostolic Age was that of Saint Paul, whose central themes were the notion of the pre-existence of Christ and the worship of Christ as Kyrios (Greek: Lord).^[4] Following the Apostolic Age, there was fierce and often politicized debate in the early church on many interrelated issues. Christology was a major focus of these debates, and was addressed at every one of the first seven ecumenical councils—the second through fourth of these generally being entitled "Christological councils", with the latter three mainly elucidating what was taught in them and condemning incorrect interpretations^[5]—with the Council of Chalcedon in 451 issuing a formulation of the being of Christ—that of two natures, one human and one divine, "united with neither confusion nor division",^[5] the doctrine of the hypostatic union^[5]—that is still held today amongst all Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox Christians, referred to as Chalcedonian Christianity. Due to politically charged differences in the 4th century, schisms developed, and the first denominations (from the Latin, "to take a new name") formed.^[5]

In the 13th century, Saint Thomas Aquinas provided the first systematic Christology that consistently resolved a number of the existing issues.^[6] In his Christology from above, Aquinas also championed the principle of perfection of Christ's human attributes.^[7][8][9] The Middle Ages also witnessed the emergence of the "tender image of Jesus" as a friend and a living source of love and comfort, rather than just the Kyrios image.^[10]

According to modern Catholic theologian Karl Rahner, the purpose of modern Christology is to formulate the Christian belief that "God became man and that God-made-man is the individual Jesus Christ" in a manner that this statement can be understood consistently, without the confusions of past debates and mythologies.^[11]

Terms and concepts[link]

Over the centuries, a number of terms and concepts have been developed within the framework of Christology to address the seemingly simple questions: "who was Jesus and what did he do?" A good deal of theological debate has ensued and significant schisms within Christian denominations took place in the process of providing answers to these questions. After the Middle Ages, systematic approaches to Christology were developed.

The term "Christology from above" refers to approaches that begin with the divinity and pre-existence of Christ as the Logos (the Word), as expressed in the prologue to the Gospel of John (John 1:1-14). These approaches interpret the works of Christ in terms of his divinity. Christology from above was emphasized in the ancient Church, beginning with Ignatius of Antioch in the second century.^[12][13] The term "Christology from below", on the other hand, refers to approaches that begin with the human aspects and the ministry of Jesus (including the miracles, parables, etc.) and move towards his divinity and the mystery of incarnation.^[12][13]

The concept of "Cosmic Christology", first elaborated by Saint Paul, focuses on how the arrival of Jesus as the Son of God forever changed the nature of the cosmos.^[4][14] The terms "functional", "ontological" and "soteriological" have been used to refer to the perspectives that analyze the "works", the "being" and the "salvific" standpoints of Christology.^[15] Some essential sub-topics within the field of Christology include the incarnation, the resurrection, and salvation.

The term "monastic Christology" has been used to describe spiritual approaches developed by Anselm of Canterbury, Peter Abelard and Bernard of Clairvaux. The Franciscan piety of the 12th and 13th centuries led to "popular Christology". Systematic approaches by theologians, such as Thomas Aquinas, are called "scholastic Christology".^[16]

Beginnings[link]

Saint Paul delivering the Areopagus sermon in Athens, by Raphael, 1515

Early Christians found themselves confronted with a set of new concepts and ideas relating to the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, as well the notions of salvation and redemption, and had to use a new set of terms, images and ideas to deal with them.^[17] The existing terms and structures available to them were often insufficient to express these new set of religious concepts, and taken together, these new forms of discourse led to the beginnings of Christology as an attempt to understand, explain and discuss their understanding of the nature of Christ.^[17]

Furthermore, as early Christians (following the Great Commission) had to explain their concepts to a new audience which had at times been influenced by Greek philosophy, they had to present arguments that at times resonated with, and at times confronted, the beliefs of that audience. A key example is the Apostle Paul's Areopagus sermon that appears in Acts 17:16-34. Here, the apostle attempted to convey the underlying concepts about Christ to a Greek audience, and the sermon illustrates some key elements of future Christological discourses that were first brought forward by Paul.^[17][18][19]

The Kyrios title for Jesus is central to the development of New Testament Christology, for the early Christians placed it at the center of their understanding, and from that center attempted to understand the other issues related to the Christian mysteries.^[20] The question of the deity of Christ in the New Testament is inherently related to the Kyrios title of Jesus used in the early Christian writings and its implications for the absolute lordship of Jesus. In early Christian belief, the concept of Kyrios included the pre-existence of Christ, for they believed if Christ is one with God, he must have been united with God from the very beginning.^[20][21]

In everyday Aramaic, Mari was a very respectful form of polite address, which means more than just "Teacher" and was somewhat similar to Rabbi. In Greek, this has at times been translated as Kyrios. While the term Mari expressed the relationship between Jesus and his disciples during his life, the Greek Kyrios came to represent his lordship over the world.^[22]

Apostolic Christology[link]

The Four Evangelists, by Pieter Soutman, 17th century

No writings were left by Jesus, and the study of the various Christologies of the Apostolic Age is based on early Christian documents.^[2] The Gospels provide episodes from the life of Jesus and some of his works, but the authors of the New Testament show little interest in an absolute chronology of Jesus or in synchronizing the episodes of his life,^[23] and as in John 21:25, the Gospels do not claim to be an exhaustive list of his works.^[2]

Christologies that can be gleaned from the three Synoptic Gospels generally emphasize the humanity of Jesus, his sayings, his parables, and his miracles. The Gospel of John provides a different perspective that focuses on his divinity.^[3] The first 14 verses of the Gospel of John are devoted to the divinity of Jesus as the Logos, usually translated as "Word", along with his pre-existence, and they emphasize the cosmic significance of Christ, e.g. John 1:3: "All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made." In the context of these verses, the Word made flesh is identical with the Word who was in the beginning with God, being exegetically equated with Jesus.^[3]

A foremost contribution to the Christology of the Apostolic Age is that of Paul. The central Christology of Paul conveys the notion of Christ's pre-existence and the identification of Christ as Kyrios.^[4] The Pauline epistles use Kyrios to identify Jesus almost 230 times, and express the theme that the true mark of a Christian is the confession of Jesus as the true Lord.^[24] Paul viewed the superiority of the Christian revelation over all other divine manifestations as a consequence of the fact that Christ is the Son of God.^[3]

The Pauline epistles also advanced the "cosmic Christology" of the fourth gospel, elaborating the cosmic implications of Jesus' existence as the Son of God, as in 2 Corinthians 5:17: "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come." Also, in Colossians 1:15: "He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation."^[4][14]

Post-Apostolic controversies[link]

Following the Apostolic Age, from the second century onwards, a number of controversies developed about how the human and divine are related within the person of Jesus.^[25][26] As of the second century, a number of different and opposing approaches developed among various groups. For example, Arianism did not endorse divinity, Ebionism argued Jesus was an ordinary mortal, while Gnosticism held docetic views which argued Christ was a spiritual being who only appeared to have a physical body.^[27][28] The resulting tensions lead to schisms within the church in the second and third centuries, and ecumenical councils were convened in the fourth and fifth centuries to deal with the issues. Eventually, by the Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon in 451, the Hypostatic union was decreed—the proposition that Christ has one human nature [physis] and one divine nature [physis], united with neither confusion nor division—making this part of the creed of orthodox Christianity.^[25][26] Although some of the debates seemed to be over a theological iota, they took place in controversial political circumstances and resulted in a schism that formed the Church of the East.^[29][30]

In 325, the First Council of Nicaea defined the persons of the Godhead and their relationship with one another - decisions which were reratified at the First Council of Constantinople in 381. The language used was that the one God exists in three persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit); in particular, it was affirmed that the Son was homoousios (of same substance) as the Father. The Nicene Creed declared the full divinity and full humanity of Jesus.^[31][32][33]

In 431, the First Council of Ephesus was initially called to address the views of Nestorius on Mariology, but the problems soon extended to Christology, and schisms followed. The 431 council was called because in defense of his loyal priest Anastasius, Nestorius had denied the Theotokos title for Mary and later contradicted Proclus during a sermon in Constantinople. Pope Celestine I (who was already upset with Nestorius due to other matters) wrote about this to Cyril of Alexandria, who orchesterated the council. During the council, Nestorius defended his position by arguing there must be two persons of Christ, one human, the other divine, and Mary had given birth only to a human, hence could not be called the Theotokos, i.e. "the one who gives birth to God". The debate about the single or dual nature of Christ ensued in Ephesus.^{[34][35][36][37]}

The Council of Ephesus debated hypostasis (coexisting natures) versus monophysitism (only one nature) versus miaphysitism (two natures united as one) versus Nestorianism (disunion of two natures). From the Christological viewpoint, the council adopted hypostasis, i.e. coexisting natures, but its language was less definitive than the 451 Council of Chalcedon. The Oriental Orthodox rejected this and subsequent councils and to date consider themselves to be miaphysite.^[38][39] By contrast, Roman Catholics to date believe in the hypostatic union and the Trinity. The council also confirmed the Theotokos title and excommunicated Nestorius.^[40]

The 451 Council of Chalcedon was highly influential and marked a key turning point in the Christological debates that broke apart the church of the Eastern Roman Empire in the fifth century.^[41] It is the last council which many Anglicans and most Protestants consider ecumenical.^[42] It fully promulgated the hypostatic union, stating the human and divine natures of Christ coexist, yet each is distinct and complete. Although, the Chalcedonian Creed did not put an end to all Christological debate, it did clarify the terms used and became a point of reference for many future Christologies. Most of the major branches of Christianity — Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Anglicanism, Lutheranism, and Reformed — subscribe to the Chalcedonian Christological formulation, while many branches of Eastern Christianity - Syrian Orthodoxy, Assyrian Church, Coptic Orthodoxy, Ethiopian Orthodoxy, and Armenian Apostolicism - reject it.^[42][43][44]

Middle Ages to the Reformation[link]

The spiritual Christology of St. Anselm and his monastic contemporaries led to a view of Jesus as a "helping friend", as well as the Lord.^[10]

While the concept of Kyrios dominated the Christology of the Apostolic Age, an important supplementary element emerged in the Middle Ages. Based on the influences of Anselm of Canterbury, Bernard of Clairvaux and women mystics, the "tender image of Jesus" as a friend and a source of love and comfort was developed. This contrasted with the images of Jesus as the Lord and as the key to eventual salvation based on his sacrifice at Calvary. The Franciscan approach to popular piety strengthened this friendly image. According to Archbishop Rowan Williams, this made an important impact within the Christian ministry by allowing Christians to feel the living presence of Jesus as a loving figure "who is always there to harbor and nurture those who turn to him for help and take delight in his presence".^[10][16]

The Middle Ages, between the fifth and 15th centuries, ushered in three new aspects of Christology: monastic, popular and academic. The spiritual and monastic perspectives were due to Anselm of Canterbury, Peter Abelard and Bernard of Clairvaux, each focusing on a different variation of that theme. The popular piety championed by the Franciscans led to a more widespread appreciation of Christology from the Middle Ages onwards. At the same time, European universities embarked on a systematic and scholarly approach to Christology, with Thomas Aquinas being the key figure in that arena.^[16]

Some key theological figures in this period, such as Saint Augustine or John Calvin, never wrote specific works on Christology, yet modern scholars have attempted to extract Christological insights from their works, e.g. the study of Theocentricism in the writings of Augustine and the analysis of Christ as "king, priest and prophet" in the writings of Calvin.^[45][46]

During the Middle Ages, many of the conflicts between Scripture and tradition were resolved through the construction of theological arguments, and were presented in terms of summae, which summed up complete presentations of discussions that led to knowledge.^[47] The apex of these in the 13th century was provided by Saint Thomas Aquinas. His Summa Theologiae presented the first systematic Christology that consistently resolved a number of the existing issues. In his Christology from above, Aquinas also championed the principle of perfection of Christ, namely that in every human sense, Jesus was the best that could ever be.^[7][8][9]

The question of "grace" was at the heart of the Reformation, which Martin Luther initiated. This amounted to the question of where do I find a gracious God? Luther believed the saving work of Christ is imputed for the remission of sins via the words of the gospels. This led to his fourfold formula of solo Christo, sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura, i.e. only Christ, grace, faith and scripture.^[48] Martin Luther believed in the Creed of Chalcedon and that Jesus was both God and man. He viewed incarnation as the union of God and man.^[49]

Christological issues[link]

Person of Christ[link]

Christ Pantocrator, Holy Trinity's monastery, Meteora, Greece

The Person of Christ refers to the study of the human and divine natures of Jesus Christ as they coexist within one person.^[50] There are no direct discussion in the New Testament regarding the dual nature of the Person of Christ as both divine and human.^[50] Hence, since the early days of Christianity, theologians have debated various approaches to the understanding of these natures, at times resulting in schisms.^[50]

Historically in the Alexandrian school of thought (fashioned on the Gospel of John), Jesus Christ is the eternal Logos who already possesses unity with the Father before the act of Incarnation.^[51] In contrast, the Antiochian school views Christ as a single, unified human person apart from his relationship to the divine.^[51]

John Calvin maintained there was no human element in the Person of Christ which could be separated from the Person of The Word.^[52] Calvin also emphasized the importance of the "Work of Christ" in any attempt at understanding the Person of Christ and cautioned against ignoring the Works of Jesus during his ministry.^[53]

The study of the Person of Christ continued into the 20th century, with modern theologians such as Karl Rahner and Hans von Balthasar. Rahner pointed out the coincidence between the Person of Christ and the Word of God, referring to Mark 8:38 and Luke 9:26 which state whoever is ashamed of the words of Jesus is ashamed of the Lord himself.^[54] Balthasar argued the union of the human and divine natures of Christ was achieved not by the "absorption" of human attributes, but by their "assumption". Thus, in his view, the divine nature of Christ was not affected by the human attributes and remained forever divine.^[55]

Nativity and the Holy Name[link]

The Nativity of Jesus impacted the Christological issues about his Person from the earliest days of Christianity. Luke's Christology centers on the dialectics of the dual natures of the earthly and heavenly manifestations of existence of the Christ, while Matthew's Christology focuses on the mission of Jesus and his role as the savior.^[56][57] The salvific emphasis of Matthew 1:21 later impacted the theological issues and the devotions to Holy Name of Jesus.^[58][59][60]

Matthew 1:23 provides a key to the "Emmanuel Christology" of Matthew. Beginning with 1:23, Matthew shows a clear interest in identifying Jesus as "God with us" and in later developing the Emmanuel characterization of Jesus at key points throughout the rest of his Gospel.^[61] The name Emmanuel does not appear elsewhere in the New Testament, but Matthew builds on it in Matthew 28:20 ("I am with you always, even unto the end of the world") to indicate Jesus will be with the faithful to the end of the age.^[61][62] According to Ulrich Luz, the Emmanuel motif brackets the entire Gospel of Matthew between 1:23 and 28:20, appearing explicitly and implicitly in several other passages.^[63]

Crucifixion and Resurrection[link]

The accounts of the crucifixion and subsequent resurrection of Jesus provides a rich background for Christological analysis, from the canonical Gospels to the Pauline Epistles.^[64]

A central element in the Christology presented in the Acts of the Apostles is the affirmation of the belief that the death of Jesus by crucifixion happened "with the foreknowledge of God, according to a definite plan".^[65] In this view, as in Acts 2:23, the cross is not viewed as a scandal, for the crucifixion of Jesus "at the hands of the lawless" is viewed as the fulfilment of the plan of God.^[65][66]

Paul's Christology has a specific focus on the death and resurrection of Jesus. For Paul, the crucifixion of Jesus is directly related to his resurrection and the term "the cross of Christ" used in Galatians 6:12 may be viewed as his abbreviation of the message of the gospels.^[67] For Paul, the crucifixion of Jesus was not an isolated event in history, but a cosmic event with significant eschatological consequences, as in Cor 2:8.^[67] In the Pauline view, Jesus, obedient to the point of death (Phil 2:8), died "at the right time" (Rom 4:25) based on the plan of God.^[67] For Paul, the "power of the cross" is not separable from the resurrection of Jesus.^[67]

Threefold office[link]

The threefold office (Latin munus triplex) of Jesus Christ is a Christian doctrine based upon the teachings of the Old Testament. It was described by Eusebius and more fully developed by John Calvin. It states that Jesus Christ performed three functions (or "offices") in his earthly ministry - those of prophet (Deuteronomy 18:14-22), priest (Psalm 110:1-4), and king (Psalm 2). In the Old Testament, the appointment of someone to any of these three positions could be indicated by anointing him or her by pouring oil over the head. Thus, the term messiah, meaning "anointed one", is associated with the concept of the threefold office. While the office of king is that most frequently associated with the Messiah, the role of Jesus as priest is also prominent in the New Testament, being most fully explained in chapters 7 to 10 of the Book of Hebrews.

Mariology[link]

Some Christians, notably Roman Catholics, view Mariology as a key component of Christology.^[68] In this view, not only is Mariology a logical and necessary consequence of Christology, but without it, Christology is incomplete, since the figure of Mary contributes to a fuller understanding of who Christ is and what he did.^[69] Certain Christian traditions of Protestant heritage tend not to hold this view.

Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI) expressed this sentiment about Roman Catholic Mariology when in two separate occasions he stated, "The appearance of a truly Marian awareness serves as the touchstone indicating whether or not the Christological substance is fully present"^[70] and "It is necessary to go back to Mary, if we want to return to the truth about Jesus Christ."^[71]

See also[link]

• Arianism
• Christian views of Jesus
• Jesusism
• Mariology
• Names and titles of Jesus in the New Testament
• New Testament view on Jesus' life
• Religious perspectives on Jesus
• Scholastic Lutheran Christology

Notes[link]

References[link]

Further reading[link]

External links[link]

• Encyclopaedia Britannica, Christology - full access article

v t e Christian theology Outline of Christian theology Systematic Scripture Inspiration · Canonics · Biblical studies · Exegesis · Law and Gospel · Hermeneutics Of God Attributes · Christology · Pneumatology · Trinity · Father · Son (Hypostatic union · Incarnation · Jesus · Logos · Christocentric) · Holy Spirit · Theocentricism · Immutability · Impassibility Cosmology Creation · Angels · Angelic hierarchy · Humanity · Fallen angels · Satan · Theodicy Soteriology Absolution · Adoption · Assurance · Atonement · Baptism · Conversion · Eternal life · Faith · Forgiveness · Glorification · Grace · Irresistible grace · Imputation · Justification · Lapsarianism · Means of grace · Mortification · Ordo Salutis · Predestination · Reconciliation · Redemption · Regeneration · Repentance · Resurrection · Salvation · Sanctification · Theosis · Union with Christ Hamartiology Adam · Anthropology · The Fall · Incurvatus in se · Original sin · Sin · Theodicy · Total depravity Ecclesiology Sacrament · Missiology · Polity (Congregational · Episcopal · Presbyterian) · Synod · Conciliarity Eschatology Summary of differences · Historicism · Idealism · Dispensationalism · Futurism · Preterism · Millenarianism (Pre-/ Post-/ A-) · Adventism · Antichrist · Apocalypse · Apocalypticism · Covenant/New Covenant theology · End times · Heaven · Hell · Last Judgment · Millennialism · New Jerusalem · Rapture · Second Coming · Soul sleep · Tribulation · War in Heaven Historical History of Christian theology · Calvinist–Arminian debate · Apostolic Age · Canon · Patristics · Caesaropapism · Semipelagianism · Iconoclasm · Scholasticism · Thomism · Conciliarism · Renaissance · Protestant Reformation · Counter-Reformation · Pietism · Great Awakenings Practical Apologetics · Biblical law · Education · Ethics · Homiletics · Liturgics · Missiology · Moral · Pastoral · Polemics · Political By Tradition Eastern Orthodox theology Apophatic theology · Cataphatic theology · Economy · Essence–Energies · Filioque · Gnomic will · Metousiosis · Phronema · Phyletism · Proskynesis · Sobornost · Symphonia · Tabor light · Theoria · Theosis · Theotokos Roman Catholic theology Absolution · Apostolic succession · Assumption of Mary · Traditionalism · Ecumenical Councils · Icon veneration · Immaculate conception · Indulgences · Infant baptism · Josephology · Liturgy · Mariology · Mass · Modernism · Natural Law · Papal infallibility · Priesthood · Purgatory · Quartodecimanism · Real presence · Sacerdotalism · Sacrament · Sainthood · Thomism · Transubstantiation · Ultramontanism Protestant theology Widely held Protestant theology Adiaphora · Assurance · Believer's baptism · Priesthood of the believer Anglican Anglo-Catholicism · Evangelical Catholic · High church · Latitudinarian · Low church Arminian / Wesleyan Christian perfection · Conditional preservation of the saints · Imparted righteousness · Lordship salvation · Prevenient grace Lutheran Two kingdoms · Loci Theologici · Theology of the Cross · Confessional Lutheran · Haugean · Lutheran Orthodoxy · Lutheran scholasticism · Neo-Lutheranism Reformed Christian Reconstructionism · Covenantalism · Free Grace theology · Monergism · Predestination · Five solas (Sola fide · Sola gratia · Sola scriptura · Soli Deo gloria · Solus Christus) · Supersessionism · Total depravity · TULIP Pentecostalism Baptism with the Holy Spirit · Faith healing · Fivefold ministry · Glossolalia Other Traditions Adventistism · Anabaptism · Dispensationalism · Evangelicalism · Fundamentalism · Messianic Judaism · Pietism · Prosperity theology · Restorationism Christianity Portal

The Cross Movement is a Christian hip hop group from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.^[1]

Ministry[link]

The Cross Movement has three separate and distinct eponymous components which comprise its ministry. The first component is the Christian hip hop group known as The Cross Movement (CM) which was most recently composed of four solo rappers: The Ambassador (William Branch), The Tonic (John Wells), Phanatik (Brady Goodwin), and T.R.U.-L.I.F.E, (Virgil Byrd). The CM also frequently collaborates with the Christian disc jockey, DJ Official. The CM’s niche has been to translate biblical and Christian theology into rap music by using the same hyper-aggressive lyrics, sampled orchestral riffs, alliteration, and virtuoso delivery of many underground rappers without the self-aggrandizing and violent lyrics, or the materialistic imagery stereotypically associated with many rappers. The second component to the Cross Movement is the record label, Cross Movement Records (CMR), which is responsible for producing and marketing the albums of the CM, its individual members' solo albums, and other Christian hip hop artists such as Da' T.R.U.T.H. and FLAME. The third aspect of the Cross Movement is the incorporated, non-profit group called Cross Movement Ministries (CMM), which aims to use creative ways to spread the Christian gospel message within hip hop culture.

Nomenclature[link]

Since its inception, the CM has chosen to define itself as the Christian or holy division of hip hop culture as opposed to the hip hop or rap division of Christian culture. Within the genre of rap music, there are various subgenres such as gangsta rap, Conscious rap, old school rap, crunk, and reggaeton, but all of it falls under the rubric of rap and, by extension, hip hop. In choosing to define their music as simply being another subgenre — i.e., the Christian rap subgenre — of hip hop culture, the CM attempts to "keep it real" in order to maintain the validity needed to influence members of hip hop culture who may or may not be Christians. In their 2003 release, Holy Culture, the CM stated their reasoning is based on a passage from the Bible, John 17:15-19 in which Jesus said to God:

“My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one. They are not of the world, even as I am not of it. Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth. As you sent me into the world, I have sent them into the world. For them I sanctify myself, that they too may be truly sanctified.”

As the word sanctified means "to set apart", the interpretation maintained by the CM is that they are instructed by Jesus to remain a part of hip hop culture while being set apart from the majority of the followers of hip hop culture in order to influence it from within to conform to the mores and moral code preached by followers of Christ. The acceptance of this interpretation has been mixed, however. Despite their claim to be a part of hip hop culture, the CM has slowly found more acceptance, though not total acceptance, in the Christian community than in the secular hip hop community as the majority of their concerts are held at churches or church-sponsored events as opposed to secular venues. In 2006, the CM received a Grammy nomination for “Best Rock Gospel Album,”^{[citation needed]} as opposed to any of the traditional hip hop or rap categories. Additionally, the CM has generally only been recognized at Christian and Gospel awards shows such as the Dove Awards or Stellar Awards^[2] as opposed to hip hop-only award shows such as the Source Awards or the Vibe Awards.

The Ambassador[link]

A graduate of Dallas Theological Seminary, William “Duce” Branch a.k.a. The Ambassador is the co-planter of Epiphany Fellowship in Philadelphia, PA. He has toured globally as a solo artist and with The Cross Movement and been covered by media outlets as diverse as Time Magazine, CCM Magazine, VIBE, The Source, Billboard and The Washington Post, Philadelphia Inquirer and more. He has also served as the president of the non-profit organization Cross Movement Ministries and ministered the gospel through rap and preaching for nearly 15 years. With a passionate commitment to the kingdom of Christ as well as a firm belief that faith must integrate with culture, The Ambassador has become known for his devotion to proclaiming Jesus Christ to urban contexts, and through urban mediums.

Building on the success of his sophomore solo project "The Thesis" and his Grammy- and Stellar-nominated release HIStory with group The Cross Movement, The Ambassador follows with The Chop Chop—an album with production by J.R., Official, Tony Stone and HOTHANDZ topped with an uncompromising message that will challenge listeners, while exposing the authenticity and supremacy of God.

“The Chop Chop: From Milk to Meat” is both an invitation and an exhortation from the Grammy, GMA Dove and Stellar nominated artist to rally those who are hungry for truth and determined to mature. “The current trend in our culture—and sadly in the church—is to ‘dumb down’ almost everything. Some things require a little more intensity, commitment and grind, and our faith is certainly one of those jewels,”^{[citation needed]} states The Ambassador.

With special guest appearances by Lecrae, Trip Lee, Da’ T.R.U.T.H. and Stephen the Levite, The Chop Chop calls all hearers to take the meat of God’s weighty truth and “chop it up,” chew it until it becomes a part of them.

Following the single “Gimme Dat!,” The Chop Chop has been called “a project that fires on all cylinders.” Already embraced by broadcast Gospel outlets, The Ambassador most recently performed “Gimme Dat!” on TBN’s “Praise The Lord,” and is set to appear on TV1’s “The Gospel of Music with Jeff Majors” and INSP’s “Mixx Masters Lounge.

Discography[link]

Videography[link]

• "Holy Culture DVD" 2004

References[link]

External links[link]

• Cross Movement Records
• Cross Movement Solo interviews on Rapzilla[1]
• Cross Movement Videos on Rapzilla[2]
• Video Showcasing Cross Movement

Sir Anthony Wass Buzzard, 2nd Baronet CB, DSO, OBE (28 April 1902 – 10 March 1972), was an officer in the Royal Navy, and a Director of Naval Intelligence.

Early life[link]

Anthony Wass Buzzard was born on 28 April 1902 in Derbyshire, son of prominent physician and Regius Professor of Medicine at the University of Oxford Sir Edward Farquhar Buzzard. Anthony later moved to Surrey where his father’s large estate was located. Anthony’s father was a doctor and physician to King George VI. In 1929, his father was created a baronet, with the title of Sir Farquhar of Munstead Grange. Anthony was the second eldest of five siblings: Margaret, Anthony, Sylvia, and Isabel. He attended a public prep school from age eight to thirteen, and studied at the Royal Naval College, Dartmouth and Royal Naval College Osborne. In 1915, at the age of thirteen, he joined the Royal Navy as a midshipman, and served during the First World War. By 1919 he was aboard the battleship HMS Iron Duke.

In 1932, Buzzard married Margaret Alfreda Knapp, the daughter of a civil servant. Her father was the deputy governor of Madras and had his own train. The couple enjoyed an extensive social life, and together had three children: Anthony, Timothy, and Gillian. Buzzard was a family man and a devout Christian. His sailors remembered seeing him kneeling on his ship in prayer. During the war, he would sing in hospitals to try to cheer up the patients. He attended Anglican services every Sunday with his family, and gave large sums of money to charity.

Second World War[link]

Buzzard commanded the destroyer HMS Gurkha during the early years of the war, and his actions during her sinking led to the award of the Distinguished Service Order. Gurkha was part of a force of cruisers and destroyers sent by the British in the immediate aftermath of the German invasion of Norway on 7 April 1940. Gurkha was also the first British destroyer to be sunk by an air attack. On 19 April the British ships were attacked by Junkers Ju 88 and Heinkel He 111 bombers. Gurkha was hit by one bomb on the aft end, which blew a forty-foot hole in the starboard side. The stern caught fire and the magazine had to be flooded to prevent it exploding. She then sank, leaving a number of her crew stranded in the water. Buzzard held up a man with a broken leg for an hour and a half in the freezing waters of the North Sea.

Buzzard was then one of the captains assigned to visit the parents of those lost in the sinking of HMS Hood to offer his condolences.^[1] By 1941 Buzzard was serving as gunnery officer aboard the battleship HMS Rodney during the pursuit and sinking of the German battleship Bismarck, with the Rodney being the first ship to open fire with her own guns. He was made an Officer of the British Empire for his service. Buzzard then served as Assistant Director, in the Admiralty Plans Division, and as a member of Joint Planning Committee, with the War Cabinet between 1942 and 1943.

Buzzard became captain of the aircraft carrier HMS Glory. He spent three months overseeing the final fitting out before Glory was commissioned on 21 February 1945. On 14 May the ship became operational and departed her harbour, bound for the Mediterranean. From there she went on to Fremantle, where she arrived in time for Victory over Japan Day. Once V.J. Day was over, the ship went to Rabaul for the signing of the surrender of the Japanese forces there. The Japanese commander surrendered his sword to the British and American soldiers. This sword remained in Buzzard's possession until his death; it was then taken to the Churchill Archives Centre, along with other important artefacts. Buzzard inherited the baronetcy upon his father's death in 1945.

Post-war[link]

Buzzard was assigned to the Royal Naval Air Service after the end of the war, and commanded the cruiser HMS Superb between 1946 and 1950. In 1951, at the age of forty- nine, Buzzard became the youngest man to be appointed Director of Naval Intelligence. He was also a rear-admiral. His independence, however, prevented him from going further in the bureaucratic system. He was in the post until his retirement in 1954.

After his retirement from the service he joined the defence contractor Vickers-Armstrong, during the Cold War. Buzzard was a founder member of both the Institute of Strategic Studies, and the Council of Christian Approaches to Defence and Disarmament. He frequently corresponded with Henry Kissinger, and developed the idea of “Graduated Deterrence.” Graduated Deterrence posited that one must issue a reasonable threat to one’s enemy that is also realizable and not so massive that no one believes that it will ever happen. During the 1960s he sat on the Minister of State for Disarmament, Lord Chalfont's Disarmament Panel. In 1967 he became Chairman of the British Council of Churches Committee on the Middle East.

Death[link]

Buzzard played tennis and rugby throughout his life, with his main passion being tennis, having been the Navy champion. He had played doubles with his brother at Wimbledon in 1922. He suffered a heart attack at the age of sixty-five, but refused to slow down the pace of his life, to the consternation of his wife. He travelled to Australia in 1968, and played a tennis match upon arrival after a thirty-eight hour flight. He suffered a second heart attack. His wife joined him in Australia, and four years later, in 1972, he suffered a third and fatal heart attack and died on 10 March at the age of sixty-nine. His memorial service at St. Martins was attended by a large number of people.^[1]

Notes[link]

References[link]

• Ballard, Robert. Exploring the Bismarck. Singapore: Odyssey Corporation, 1991.
• Buzzard, Anthony. Personal interview. 24 Feb.2002.
• Hurley, Anne. Rev. of National Geographic’s Search for Battleship Bismarck.
• McGowen, Tom. Sink the Bismarck Germany’s Super-Battleship of World War II.
• Brookfield, CT: Twenty-First Century Books, 1999.
• Sloan, Frank. Bismarck! New York: A Franklin Watts Library Edition, 1991.
• Wright, Christina, The Papers of Rear-Admiral Sir Anthony Wass Buzzard; Sir Anthony Wass Buzzard and the Sinking of the Bismarck, April,2002 [1]

External links[link]

• “H.M.S. Gurkha.” 16 Jan.2002.
• College London Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives.” 16 Jan. 2002.
• Allied Warships. HMS Gurkha.

v t e Directors of Naval Intelligence W.H. Hall (1887–1889) Bridge (1889–1894) Beaumont (1895–1899) Custance (1899–1902) Battenberg (1902–1905) Ottley (1905–1907) Slade (1907–1909) Bethell (1909–1912) Jackson (1912–1913) Oliver (1913–1914) W.R. Hall (1914–1919) Sinclair (1919–1921) Fitzmaurice (1921–1924) Hotham (1924–1927) Fisher (1926–1927) Domvile (1927–1930) Usborne (1930–1932) Dickens (1932–1935) Troup (1935–1939) Godfrey (1939–1943) Rushbrooke (1943–1946) Parry (1946–1948) Longley-Cook (1948–1951) Buzzard (1951–1954) Inglis (1954–1960) Denning (1960–1964) Graham (1964–1965)