Youtube results:
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2012) |
Rail transport |
---|
Operations |
Track |
Maintenance |
High-speed |
Gauge |
Stations |
Trains |
Locomotives |
Rolling stock |
Companies |
History |
Attractions |
Terminology |
By country |
Accidents |
|
|
High-speed rail (HSR) is a type of passenger rail transport that operates significantly faster than traditional rail traffic. As of 2012 the maximum commercial speed was about 300 km/h (186 mph) for the majority of installed systems (Japan, China, Taiwan, Germany, Italy, UK), 310 km/h (193 mph) in Spain and 320 km/h (199 mph) in France. The Shanghai Maglev Train reaches 431 km/h (268 mph).
High speed trains travel at their maximum speed on specific tracks, generally using standard gauge (except Russia and Finland), with avoiding at-grade crossings, and few curves.
The world speed record for conventional high-speed rail is held by the V150, a specially configured and heavily-modified version of Alstom's TGV which clocked 574.8 km/h (357.2 mph) on a test run. The world speed record for Maglev is held by the Japanese experimental MLX01: 581 km/h (361 mph).[1]
While high-speed rail is usually designed for passenger travel, some high-speed systems also offer freight service. For instance, the French mail service La Poste owns a few special TGV trains for carrying postal freight.
Contents |
Multiple definitions for high-speed rail are in use worldwide.
Some features are unique to high-speed rail : effectively, lot of conventionally-hauled trains reach 200 km/h in commercial service, beginning with the French "Capitole" launched in 1967, but are not considered as high-speed trains.
This section may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. You can help. The discussion page may contain suggestions. (September 2010) |
Railways were the first form of mass transportation on land and until the development of the motorcar in the early 20th century, had an effective monopoly on land transport. Both streamlined steam locomotives and high-speed EMUs were used for high speed services.
The high-speed rail era started 6 October 1903. An electrical railcar from Siemens & Halske sped away at 203 km/h (126 mph) on the military railway track between Marienfeld and Zossen in Germany. It showed that high-speed rail was possible, and that the future was electric. For scheduled trains, however, that speed was still more than 60 years away.
In 1945 a Spanish engineer, Alejandro Goicoechea, invented a streamlined diesel train that, while slightly slower than previous high-speed passenger trains, could move on existing tracks and take curves at a speed of 80 mph vs 30 mph for most passenger trains. He achieved this by designing both the locomotive and cars with a unique axle system that used one axle set per car, connected by a Y-bar coupler, and where the center of mass was only half as high as usual.[5]
In the densely-populated country of Japan, especially the 45-million-people area between Tokyo and Osaka, congestion on road and rail became a serious problem in the 1950's.[6]. Japan in the 1950s was a crowded, resource-limited nation that for security reasons did not want to import petroleum, but needed a way to transport its millions of people in and between cities. In 1957, the engineers at local private Odakyu Electric Railway in Greater Tokyo area launched the Odakyū 3000 series SE EMU. This EMU set a world record for narrow gauge trains at 145 km/h (90 mph), giving the Odakyu engineers confidence they could safely and reliably build even faster trains at standard gauge.[6] Engineers started planning the last intercity dedicated high-speed line. After initial feasibility tests, the plan was fast-tracked and construction was started in 20 April 1959;[7] test runs in 1963 hit top speeds of 256 km/h (159 mph). In October 1964, just in time for the Olympic Games, they opened the first modern high speed rail, the Shinkansen, Tōkaidō Shinkansen, between the two cities.
The first Shinkansen trains, the 0 Series Shinkansen, built by Kawasaki Heavy Industries—in English often called "Bullet Trains", after the original Japanese name Dangan Ressha(弾丸列車)—outclassed the earlier fast trains in commercial service. They ran the 515 km (320 mi) distance with a top speed of 210 km/h (130 mph) and an average speed of 162.8 km/h (101.2 mph) with stops at Nagoya and Kyoto. But the speed was only a part of the Shinkansen revolution. The earlier high-speed or proto-high-speed trains and railcars were few and far between (ten Red Devils, 15 Brill Bullets, a few Zephyrs with different forenames, two Elelectroliners, one Morning Hiawatha, one Fliegender Hamburger, etc., each with 150 seats at best). While these services were initially limited, Shinkansen offered HSR for the masses. The first Bullet trains had 12 cars; later versions had up to 16,[8] and double-deck trains increase the capacity.[9][10]
After three years, more than 100 million passengers had used the trains, and the first billion was passed in 1976.[11] The Shinkansen system has grown to a 2,387.7 km (1,484 mi) network with 422.6 km (263 mi) currently under construction and a further 770 km (478 mi) awaiting construction (see Shinkansen#List of Shinkansen lines). The Shinkansen has an operating speed of up to 300 km/h and in early 2013 the Tōhoku Shinkansen will further increase the speed to 320 km/h (200 mph).[12][13] The Tōkaidō Shinkansen is the world's busiest high-speed rail line. Up to ten trains (14 trains, if including intermittent service) per hour with 16 cars (1,323 seats capacity) run in each direction with a minimum of 3 minutes between trains.[14] Though largely a long-distance transport system, the Shinkansen also serves commuters who travel to work in metropolitan areas from outlying cities.[15] As of 2012 the Shinkansen's 47-year, 7 billion-passenger history had included no passenger fatalities due to derailments or collisions.[16]
In May 2011, the Japanese government approved the construction of the first 286 km of the Chūō Shinkansen maglev line, which will have an operating speed of 505 km/h (314 mph) and will link Tokyo and Nagoya by 2027. The plan is to link it with Osaka by 2045. The maglev line is expected to complete the journey from Tokyo to Nagoya in 40 minutes, down from the current 100 minutes. Eventually it is planned to complete the Tokyo to Osaka journey in a little over 60 minutes, down from the current 155 minutes.[17]
The 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, which affected Sendai, a city northeast of Tokyo, automatically stopped all Shinkansen trains. No Shinkansen passengers suffered injuries, and the Tokaido Shinkansen between Tokyo and Osaka resumed operation several hours after the disasters, while the Tohoku Shinkansen remained out of service for several days.[18] On 12 March 2011, the northern 130 km of the Kyushu Shinkansen opened, although opening ceremonies were canceled due the earthquake and tsunami (see Kyushu Shinkansen).
Japan's Shinkansen success contributed to a revival for the idea in —together with rising oil prices, a growing environmental interest and rising road congestion.
In Europe, high-speed rail started during the International Transport Fair in Munich in June 1965, when DB Class 103 hauled a total of 347 demonstration cars at 200 km/h (124 mph) between Munich and Augsburg. The first regular service at this speed was the TEE "Le Capitole" between Paris and Toulouse with specially-adapted SNCF Class BB 9200 locomotives (May 1967).
Great Britain introduced Europe's first regular service that travelled above 200 km/h (124 mph), albeit with a small margin and without building new lines. In the years 1976–82 they made 95 diesel-electric train sets of the type InterCity 125 – so called because of their maximum speed at 125 mph (201 km/h), compared to 100 mph (161 km/h) for their forerunners. Their acceleration was faster, too. Journey times were reduced, e.g., by an hour on the East Coast Main Line, and passenger numbers soared. The IC 125 was planned to be followed by a tilting train, APT, to maximize the speed on twisting Victorian lines – but the tilting mechanism caused nausea in some passengers, and the APT project was shelved. This prolonged the IC 125’s lifetime, and even today they serve non-electrified mainlines.
In Continental Europe several countries started to build new high-speed lines during the 1970s, including Italy's Direttissima between Rome and Florence, Western Germany’s Hannover–Würzburg and Stuttgart–Mannheim lines and France’s Paris–Lyon TGV line (LGV Sud-Est). The latter was the world’s fastest when it opened in 1983 (the Paris–Dijon partition opened in 1981), with maximum speed of 270kmh / 167mph and an average of 214kmh / 132mph. Fares were affordable and the line became very popular; the air routes between these cities were practically eliminated when train journeys shrank from about 3½ to two hours. France went on building an extensive high-speed network. In combination with the Belgian and British lines, the Paris–Lille–Calais line allowed the opening of the first HSR international services: Paris–London (1994), London–Brussels (1994), both via the Channel Tunnel[19] and Brussels–Paris (1995).[20] Germany followed up with its own high-speed network, and after Germany was re-united in 1990, Hamburg–Berlin again became a mainline.
Spain’s first high speed line opened in 1992 between Madrid and Seville. In 2005, the Spanish Government announced an ambitious plan, (PEIT 2005–2020)[21] envisioning that by 2020, 90 percent of the population would live within 50 km (31 mi) of a station served by AVE. Spain began building the largest HSR network in Europe: as of 2011 five of the new lines have opened (Madrid-Zaragoza-Lleida-Tarragona-Barcelona, Córdoba- Malaga, Madrid-Toledo, Madrid-Segovia-Valladolid, Madrid-Cuenca-Valencia) and another 2,219 km (1,379 mi) were under construction.[22] As of December 2010, the Spanish AVE system is the longest HSR network in Europe and the second in the world, after China.[23]
The Acela Express in the Northeast Corridor is the fastest train in the US, linking Boston, New York and Washington, D.C. at speeds up to {{convertTemplate:240 on existing track, using tilting trains.
.
Multiple world-speed-record holder, the French TGV family
The German ICE 3 high-speed electric multiple unit
The Italian ETR 500 Frecciarossa, the train running on the Italian high speed rail network
The Chinese CRH380A, recently developed for very high speeds
Allegro train at Helsinki Central railway station
Taiwan's Japanese-built 300 km/h operating, 315 km/h capable during test run 700T series train
The Japan Shinkansen N700 Series Shinkansen . N700 series trains have a maximum speed of 300 km/h (186 mph).
In both Japan and France the initial impetus for the introduction of high speed rail was the need for additional capacity to meet increasing demand for passenger rail travel.
By the mid-1950s, the Tōkaidō Main Line in Japan was operating at full capacity, and construction of the first segment of the Tōkaidō Shinkansen between Tokyo and Osaka started in 1959. The Tōkaidō Shinkansen opened on 1 October 1964, in time for the Tokyo Olympics. The situation for the first line in Japan was different from subsequent lines. The route was already so densely-populated and rail-oriented that highway development would be extremely costly and one single line between Tokyo and Osaka could bring service to over half the nation's population. In 1959 that was nearly 45 million people; today it is well over 65 million. The Tōkaidō Shinkansen line is the most heavily-traveled high speed line in the world, carrying 138 million people in 2009,[24] and the entire Shinkansen network, carrying 322 million, transports more passengers than all other high speed rail lines in the world combined.
In France the main line between Paris and Lyon was projected to run out of capacity by 1970. In both cases the choice to build a completely separate passenger-only line allowed for much straighter lines and higher speeds. The dramatically reduced travel times on both lines, bringing cities within three hours of one another, caused explosions in ridership.[25] The commercial success of both lines inspired those countries and their economies to expand or start high speed rail networks.
The US does not have any form of high speed rail system by european and asian standards. In post-World War II United States, travel by cars and planes became easier for a greater percentage of Americans due to improvements in these technologies. In Europe and Japan, emphasis was given to rebuilding the existing, dense railway network after the war. In the United States, emphasis was given to airports and an extensive national interstate highway system.
U.S. passenger trains were unable to compete with the postwar growth in airline and highway travel. The far lower population density in North America allowed easier construction of a national highway network, and the greater distances lessened the relative value of rail versus the alternatives. Large-scale highway construction would not have been as easy given the much higher population densities of Europe and Japan.[26] However, despite modest gains in the first decade of the 21st century, Amtrak ridership per capita remains far below that of most European nations.
In China, plans for the largest high-speed railway network in the world were driven by a combination of capacity constraints on existing lines and a desire to shorten journey times, while promoting development along the route. The construction schedule was significantly accelerated due to additional funding in the 4 trillion CNY stimulus package of 2008 and a number of lines were due to be completed by 2013.
Travel by rail is more competitive in areas of higher population density or where gasoline is expensive, because conventional trains are more fuel-efficient than cars when ridership is high, similar to other forms of mass transit. Very few high-speed trains consume diesel or other fossil fuels but the power stations that provide electric trains with power can consume fossil fuels. In Japan and France, with very extensive high speed rail networks, a large proportion of electricity comes from nuclear power.[27] Even using electricity generated from coal or oil, high speed trains are significantly more fuel-efficient per passenger per kilometer traveled than the typical automobile because of economies of scale in generator technology.[28] For example, on the Eurostar, emissions from travelling by train from London to Paris are 90% lower than by flying.[29] Rail networks, like highways, require large fixed capital investments and thus require a blend of high density and government investment to be competitive against existing capital infrastructure.[citation needed] Urban density and mass transit have been key factors in the success of European and Japanese railway transport, especially in countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Spain and France.
Avances in routing, train engineering and track design raised speeds past 500 km/h (310 mph). Much of the technology behind high-speed rail is an improved application of standard gauge rail technology.
New lines employ 20th century engineering to eliminate constrictions such as at-grade crossings where lines intersect other lines and/or roadways, avoidable curves and reverse curves. Dedicated rights-of-way separate fast from slow trains. Japan typically elevated its HSR lines, increasing speed, safety and cost.
Curve radius is typically above 4.5 kilometres (2.8 mi), and for lines capable of 350 km/h (217 mph) running, typically at 7 to 9 kilometres (4.3 to 5.6 mi).
Narrow gauge (1,067 mm (3 ft 6 in))track supports speeds up to 160 kilometres per hour (99 mph) in Japan and Queensland (Tilt Train). Tunisia is reputed to have the fastest one-metre gauge trains,[30] with some services operating between Tunis–Sfax at up to 130 km/h.[31]
High-speed lines may be exclusive or open to standard speed trains.
Key technologies include tilting trainsets, aerodynamic designs (to reduce drag, lift, and noise), air brakes, regenerative braking, engine technology and dynamic weight shifting.
Some[which?] of the advances addressed problems, such as the Eschede disaster.
Continuous welded rail reduces track vibrations and misalignment. Almost all HSR is electrically driven via overhead lines, have in-cab signalling, and use advanced switches using very low entry and frog angles.
As an alternative to electrical drive, aerotrain prototypes with turboprops were tested in the Soviet Union (Aerowagon) and Germany (Schienenzeppelin) at the beginning of the 20th century. Later, trains with turbojets were tested in the United States (M-497 Black Beetle), the Soviet Union (ER22 turbojet train), and France (Aérotrain).
Magnetic levitation trains fall under the category of high-speed rail due to their association with track oriented vehicles; however their inability to operate on conventional 'rails' often puts them in a separate category. To run at their maximum speed, most high-speed trains use special, often dedicated, high speed lines.
In the U.S. the Acela Express in the Northeast Corridor links Boston, New York and Washington, D.C.[33]
Common standards for conventional high-speed lines are:
Item | Standard | Exception |
---|---|---|
Track gauge | standard gauge | Russia and Finland |
Coupling | Europe: Scharfenberg coupler Type 10 | |
Electrification - voltage and frequency | 25 kV 50 Hz; Japan (partially), Taiwan, South Korea, United States 25 kV 60 Hz. Frequency is related to grid frequency, see mains electricity by country. | 15 kV AC, 16.7 Hz: Austria, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, Norway. DC: old lines in Southern France and Italy. |
Electrification | Overhead lines | |
Platform height | in Europe most common 550 mm, Germany also 760 mm, Netherlands 760 mm | Spain >1000 mm |
Loading gauge | ||
Signalling | ETCS, in Europe lines are gradually changed to allow for ETCS, in China new lines use ETCS |
The term "maximum speed" has many meanings here. It can reflect:
The current speed record for a conventional commercial train is held by a modified TGV POS trainset, reaching 574.8 km/h (357.2 mph). This run was for proof of concept and engineering, not to test normal passenger service.
Speed record for experimental unconventional passenger train was set by the manned "magnetic-levitation" train JR-Maglev MLX01 at 581 km/h (361 mph) in 2003.
However, these speeds reached by TGV and Maglev are not necessarily suitable for passenger operations as there are concerns such as noise, costs, deceleration time in an emergency, wear and tear, etc.
The record for railed vehicles is 10,325 km/h (6,416 mph) by an unmanned rocket sled by the United States Air Force.
The Shanghai Maglev Train reaches 431 km/h (268 mph) during its daily service on its 30 km (19 mi) dedicated line, holding the speed record for commercial train service.
From mid 2011, the fastest operating conventional trains are the French TGV POS and German ICE 3 with a commercial maximum speed of 320 km/h (199 mph) on the French LGV Est.
The highest commercial operating speed record was held from August 2008 to July 2011 by China Railway High-speed trains, reaching 350 km/h (217 mph) on some lines (Beijing–Tianjin Intercity Railway, Wuhan–Guangzhou High-Speed Railway).
The highest scheduled average speed between two scheduled stops was the China Railway High-speed service on Wuhan-Guangzhou High-Speed Railway,[34] from 26 December 2009, until 29 January 2010. Non-stop trains on this line covered the 922 km (573 mi) journey in 2 hours, 57 minutes, at an average speed of 312.5 km/h (194.2 mph) from Wuhan to Guangzhou North.
Due to high costs and safety concerns the top speeds in China were reduced to 300 km/h (186 mph) on 1 July 2011.[35]
Year | Country | Train | Speed km/h | mph |
Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1963 | Japan | Shinkansen | 256 | 159 | First country to develop HSR technology |
1967 | France | TGV 001 | 318 | 198 | Second country to develop HSR technology. Current record for gas-turbine powered train. |
1972 | Japan | Shinkansen | 286 | 178 | |
1974 | France | Aérotrain | 430.2 | 267 | High speed monorail hovercraft train |
1975 | Soviet Union | ER200 | 210 | 130 | High speed EMU |
1978 | Japan | HSST-01 | 307.8 | 191 | Auxiliary rocket propulsion |
1978 | Japan | HSST-02 | 110 | 68 | |
1979 | Japan | Shinkansen | 319 | 198 | |
1979 | Japan | ML-500R (unmanned) | 504 | 313 | Magnetic levitation train |
1979 | Japan | ML-500R (unmanned) | 517 | 321 | Magnetic levitation train |
1981 | France | TGV | 380 | 236 | |
1985 | West Germany | InterCityExperimental | 324 | 201 | Third country to develop HSR technology |
1987 | Japan | MLU001 (manned) | 400.8 | 249 | Magnetic levitation train |
1988 | West Germany | InterCityExperimental | 406 | 252 | |
1988 | Italy | ETR 500-X | 319 | 198 | Fourth country to develop HSR technology |
1988 | West Germany | TR-06 | 412.6 | 256 | |
1989 | West Germany | TR-07 | 436 | 271 | |
1990 | France | TGV | 515.3 | 320 | |
1992 | Japan | Shinkansen | 350 | 217 | |
1993 | Japan | Shinkansen | 425 | 264 | |
1993 | Germany | TR-07 | 450 | 280 | Magnetic levitation train |
1994 | Japan | MLU002N | 431 | 268 | Magnetic levitation train |
1996 | Japan | Shinkansen | 446 | 277 | |
1997 | Japan | MLX01 | 550 | 342 | Magnetic levitation train |
1999 | Japan | MLX01 | 552 | 343 | Magnetic levitation train |
2002 | Spain | AVE S-102 (Talgo 350) | 362 | 225 | Fifth country to develop HSR technology |
2002 | China | China Star | 321 | 199 | Sixth country to develop HSR technology |
2003 | China | Siemens Transrapid 08 | 501 | 311 | |
2003 | Japan | MLX01 | 581 | 361 | Current world record holder for unconventional train |
2004 | South Korea | HSR-350x | 352.4 | 219 | Seventh country to develop HSR technology |
2006 | Spain | AVE S-103 (Siemens Velaro) | 404 | 251 | Unmodified commercial trainset |
2007 | France | V150 | 574.8 | 357 | Current world record holder on conventional rails |
2007 | Taiwan (Republic Of China) | 700T series train | 350 | 217 | |
2008 | China | CRH3 | 394.3 | 245 | |
2010 | China | CRH380AL | 486.1 | 302 | Claimed as world record holder for unmodified commercial trainset |
2011 | China | CRH380BL | 487.3 | 303 | Modified commercial trainset |
The early target areas, identified by France, Japan, Spain, and the U.S., were between pairs of large cities. In France, this was Paris–Lyon, in Japan, Tokyo–Osaka, in Spain, Madrid–Seville (then Barcelona)
In European countries, South Korea and Japan, dense networks of city subways and railways provide connections with high speed rail lines. The claim is that in the US HSR is incompatible with the existing automobile-oriented system. (People will want to drive when traveling in city, so they might as well drive the entire trip). However, others contend that in the Northeast Corridor, many people living outside walking distance of a connection, drive to the commuter station and ride to the HSR connection, similar to the way many people drive to an airport, park their cars and then fly. Car rentals and taxis also supplement local mass transportation. Increased commercial development is also projected near the destination stations.
In Japan intra-city rail daily usage per capita is the highest,[citation needed] with cumulative ridership of 6 billion passengers[36] exceeds the French TGV of 1 billion (as of 2003), the only other system to reach a billion passenger trips.[37] By comparison, the world's fleet of 22,685 aircraft carried 2.1 billion passengers in 2006, according to International Civil Aviation Organization.
Chicago, with its central location and metropolitan population of approximately 10 million, was envisioned as the hub of a national high-speed rail network. The beginning Midwest phases study a Minneapolis-Milwaukee-Chicago-Detroit link; a Kansas City-St Louis-Chicago link; and a Chicago-Indianapolis-Cincinnati-Columbus, OH link.
The California High-Speed Rail Authority is currently planning lines from the San Francisco Bay and Sacramento to Los Angeles and Anaheim via the Central Valley, as well as a line from Los Angeles to San Diego via the Inland Empire. The Texas High Speed Rail and Transportation Corporation[38] is lobbying for a high-speed rail and multimodal transportation corridor, dubbed the Texas T-Bone. The T-Bone would link Dallas and San Antonio via the South Central Corridor; from roughly the midpoint between these two cities, the Brazos Express corridor would provide a connection to Houston.[39][40] New York State Senator Caesar Trunzo announced a long-term plan to bring high-speed rail service between Buffalo and New York City, via Albany, to under three hours.[41] Florida officials considered and in 2011 rejected aTampa-Orlando-Miami system.
Later high speed rail lines, such as the LGV Atlantique, the LGV Est, and most high speed lines in Germany, were designed as feeder routes branching into conventional rail lines, serving a larger number of medium-sized cities.
Market segmentation has principally focused on the business travel market. The French original focus on business travelers is reflected by the early design of the TGV trains. Pleasure travel was a secondary market; now many of the French extensions connect with vacation beaches on the Atlantic and Mediterranean, as well as major amusement parks and also the ski resorts in France and Switzerland. Friday evenings are the peak time for TGVs (train à grande vitesse).[42] The system lowered prices on long distance travel to compete more effectively with air services, and as a result some cities within an hour of Paris by TGV have become commuter communities, increasing the market while restructuring land use.[43]
On the Paris – Lyon service, the number of passengers grew sufficiently to justify the introduction of double-decks coaches.
High speed north-south freight lines in Switzerland are under construction, avoiding slow mountainous truck traffic, and lowering labour costs. Most recently the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico has highlighted as one of the most probable areas for the development of high speed rail in Latin America with the Transpeninsular Fast Train for bidding in September 2011.[44]
Other target areas include freight lines, such as the Trans-Siberian Railway in Russia, which would allow 3 day Far East to Europe service for freight, potentially fitting in between the months by ship and hours by air.
Road Rail Parallel Layout uses land beside highways for railway lines. Examples include Paris/Lyon and CologneFrankfurt in which 15% and 70% of the track runs beside highways, respectively.[45]
HSR, like any transport system, is not inherently convenient, fast, clean, or comfortable. All of this depends on design, implementation, maintenance, operation and funding. Operational smoothness is often more indicative of organizational discipline than technological prowess.
Existing infrastructure constrains the growth of the highway and air travel systems. When other modes cannot expand, HSR may possibly provide a feasible alternative. For example, a double-decked E4 Series Shinkansen can carry 1,634 seated passengers, double the capacity of an Airbus A380 (world's largest passenger plane) in economy class, and more if standing passengers are allowed. HSR systems are more environmentally friendly than air or road travel, given their higher fuel efficiency per passenger-kilometer and reduced land use.
High-speed rail can accommodate more passengers at far higher speeds than automobiles.
Generally, the longer the journey, the better the time advantage of rail over road if going to the same destination. However, HSR can be competitive with cars on shorter distances, 50–150 kilometres (30–90 mi), for example for commuting, given road congestion or expensive parking fees.
Moreover, typical passenger rail carries 2.83 times as many passengers per hour per meter (width) as a road. A typical capacity is the Eurostar, which runs 15 trains per hour and 800 passengers per train, totaling 12,000 passengers per hour in each direction. By contrast, the Highway Capacity Manual gives a maximum capacity of 2,250 passenger cars per hour per lane, excluding other vehicles. Assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 1.57 people.[46] A standard twin track railway has a typical capacity 13% greater than a 6-lane highway (3 lanes each way), while requiring only 40% of the land (1.0/3.0 versus 2.5/7.5 hectares per kilometer of direct/indirect land consumption). The Tokaido Shinkansen line in Japan, has a much higher ratio (with as many as 20,000 passengers per hour per direction). Similarly commuter roads tend to carry fewer than 1.57 persons per vehicle (Washington State Department of Transportation, for instance, uses 1.2 persons per vehicle) during commute times. Congestion further reduces throughput per lane.
While commercial high-speed trains have lower maximum speeds than jet aircraft, they offer shorter total trip times than air travel for short distances. They typically connect city centre rail stations to each other, while air transport connects airports that are far from city centres. However unless an airport is severely congested, HSR typically cannot be financially justified.[citation needed]
HSR is best suited for journeys of 2 to 3 hours (about 250–900 km or 160–560 mi), for which the train can beat air and car trip time. For trips under about 650 km (400 mi), the process of checking in and going through security screening at airports, as well as traveling to and from the airport, makes the total air journey time no faster than HSR. European authorities treat HSR as competitive with passenger air for trips under 4 to 4½ hours.[48] If the train stops at an airport then combining a short HSR ride with a long airplane ride can reduce total trip time over flying on both legs. Airplane tickets can include a train segment, including rebooking missed connections.
Part of HSR's edge can be ticket prices. As an example, in 2009 the 520 km (320 mi) flight from Nanjing to Wuhan cost 730 yuan, while bullet trains beginning service that year offered second-class tickets for 180 yuan.[49]
HSR offers greater convenience for medium-distance journeys. HSR does not require baggage to be checked, does not require queuing for check-in, security and boarding, and is rarely delayed by inclement weather. HSR has more amenities, such as continuous mobile phone/Internet connectivity, larger tables, 120/220/12 volt power outlets and superior food service.
HSR eliminated air transport from between city pairs including Paris-Brussels, Cologne-Frankfurt, Nanjing-Wuhan, Chongqing-Chengdu,[49] Tokyo-Nagoya, Tokyo-Sendai and Tokyo-Niigata. China Southern Airlines, China's largest airline, expects the construction of China's high speed railway network to impact 25% of its route network in the coming years.[50]
European data indicate that air traffic is more sensitive than road traffic (car and bus) to competition from HSR, at least on journeys of 400 km and more – perhaps because cars and buses are far more flexible than planes. TGV Sud-Est reduced the air travel time Paris–Lyon from almost four to about two hours. Market share rose from 49 to 72%. Air and road market shares shrunk from 31 to 7% and from 29 to 21%, respectively. On the Madrid–Sevilla link, the AVE connection increased share from 16 to 52 ; air traffic shrunk from 40 to 13 %; road traffic from 44 to 36 %, hence the rail market amounted to 80% of combined rail and air traffic.[51] This figure increased to 89% in 2009, according to Spanish rail operator RENFE.[52]
According to Peter Jorritsma, the rail market share s, as compared to planes, can be computed approximately as a function of the travelling time in minutes t by the formula[53]
According to this formula, a journey time of three hours yields 65 % market share. However, market shares are also influenced by ticket prices. Some air carriers regained market shares by slashing prices.[54]
In the US Northeast Corridor, the rail market share at 47% between New York and Washington is lower than the formula indicates, even though the journey time is only about 2h 45min.
Although air travel has higher speeds, more time is needed for taxiing, boarding (fewer doors), security check, luggage drop, and ticket check. Also rail stations are usually located nearer to urban centers than airports. These factors often offset the speed advantage of air travel for mid-distance trips.
Japanese systems are often more expensive than their counterparts, because they run on dedicated elevated guideways, avoid traffic crossings and incorporate disaster monitoring systems. The largest part of Japan's cost is for boring tunnels through mountains, as was also true in Taiwan.
In France, the cost of construction (which was €10 million/km (US$15.1 million/km) for LGV Est) is minimised by adopting steeper grades rather than building tunnels and viaducts. However, in mountainous Switzerland, tunnels are inevitable. Because the lines are dedicated to passengers, gradients of 3.5%, rather than the previous maximum of 1–1.5% for mixed traffic, are used. More expensive land may be required in order to minimize curves. This increases speed, reduces construction costs and lowers operating and maintenance costs. In other countries high-speed rail was built without those economies so that the railway can also support other traffic, such as freight. Experience has shown however, that running trains of significantly different speeds on one line substantially decreases capacity. As a result, mixed-traffic lines usually reserve daytime for high-speed trains and run freight at night. In some cases, night-time high-speed trains are diverted to lower speed lines in favour of freight traffic.[citation needed]
Rail travel has less weather dependency than air travel. If the rail system is well-designed and well-operated, severe weather conditions such as heavy snow, heavy fog, and storms do not affect the journeys; whereas flights are generally canceled or delayed under these conditions. Nevertheless, snow, wind and flooding can delay trains.
Although comfort over air travel is often believed to be a trait of high speed rail because train seats are larger and it is easy for passengers to move around during the journey, the comfort advantage of rail is not inherent; it depends on the specific implementation. For example, high speed trains which are not subject to compulsory reservation may carry some standing passengers. Airplanes do not allow standing passengers, so excess passengers are denied boarding. Train passengers can have the choice between standing or waiting for a bookable connection.
A single train can accommodate multiple itineraries. Matching that flexibility with a plane requires intermediate stops that drastically increase air travel times relative to HSR.
HSR is much simpler to control due to its predictable course. High-speed rail systems reduce (but do not eliminate)[55][56] collisions with automobiles or people, when using non-grade level track.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: High-speed rail |
|
|
|
Look up high-speed in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
Contents |
High Speed or high-speed may refer to items in the following categories:
This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. |
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2011) |
Part of a series on
|
Historic places |
Notable people |
Neighborhood |
Museum |
Music |
Racial tension |
Timeline of racial tension |
Riots and civil unrest |
Civil rights movement |
The Omaha Race Riot occurred in Omaha, Nebraska, on September 28–29, 1919. The race riot resulted in the brutal lynching of Will Brown, a black worker; the death of two white men; the attempted hanging of the mayor Edward Parsons Smith; and a public rampage by thousands of whites who set fire to the Douglas County Courthouse in downtown Omaha. It followed more than 20 race riots that occurred in major industrial cities of the United States during the Red Summer of 1919.
Contents |
Three weeks before the riot, federal investigators had noted that "a clash was imminent owing to ill-feeling between white and black workers in the stockyards."[1] The number of blacks in Omaha doubled during the decade 1910-1920, as they were recruited to work in the meatpacking industry, and competing workers noticed. In 1910 Omaha had the third largest black population among the new western cities that had become destinations following Reconstruction. By 1920 the black population more than doubled to more than 10,000, second only to Los Angeles with nearly 16,000. It was ahead of San Francisco and Oakland, Topeka and Denver.[2][3]
The major meatpacking plants hired blacks as strikebreakers in 1917. Hostility against them was high among working class whites in the city, who were mostly Catholic immigrants of southern and eastern Europe, or descendants of immigrants, and who lived chiefly in South Omaha. Ethnic Irish were among the largest and earliest group of immigrants and they established their own power base in the city by this time. Several years earlier following the death of an Irish policeman, ethnic Irish led a mob in an attack on Greektown, which drove the Greek community from Omaha.[4]
With the moralistic administration of first-term reform mayor Edward Parsons Smith, the city's criminal establishment led by Tom Dennison created a formidable challenge in cahoots with the Omaha Business Men's Association. Smith trudged through his reform agenda with little support from the Omaha City Council or the city's labor unions. Along with several strikes throughout the previous year, on September 11 two detectives with the Omaha Police Department's "morals squad" shot and killed an African American bellhop.[5]
The violence associated with the lynching of Will Brown was triggered by reports in local media that sensationalized the alleged rape of 19-year-old Agnes Loebeck on September 25, 1919. The following day the police arrested 40-year-old Will Brown as a suspect. Loebeck identified Brown as her rapist, although later reports by the Omaha Police Department and the United States Army stated that she had not made a positive identification. There was an unsuccessful attempt to lynch Brown on the day of his arrest.
The Omaha Bee publicized the incident as one of a series of alleged attacks on white women by black men. The newspaper had carried a series of sensational articles alleging many incidents of black outrages.[6] The Bee was controlled by a political machine opposed to the newly elected reform administration of Mayor Edward Smith. It highlighted alleged incidents of "black criminality" to embarrass the new administration.[citation needed]
At about 2:00 p.m. on Sunday, September 28, 1919, a large group of white youths gathered near the Bancroft School in South Omaha and began a march to the Douglas County Courthouse, where Brown was being held. The march was intercepted by John T. Dunn, chief of the Omaha Detective Bureau, and his subordinates. Dunn attempted to disperse the crowd, but they ignored his warning and marched on. Thirty police officers were guarding the court house when the marchers arrived. By 4:00 p.m., the crowd had grown much larger. Members of the crowd bantered with the officers until the police were convinced that the crowd posed no serious threat. A report to that effect was made to the central police station, and the captain in charge sent fifty reserve officers home for the day.
By 5:00 p.m., a mob of about 4,000 whites had crowded into the street on the south side of the Douglas County Courthouse. They began to assault the police officers, pushing one through a pane of glass in a door and attacking two others who had wielded clubs at the mob. At 5:15 p.m., officers deployed fire hoses to dispel the crowd, but they responded with a shower of bricks and sticks. Nearly every window on the south side of the courthouse was broken. The crowd stormed the lower doors of the courthouse, and the Police inside discharged their weapons down an elevator shaft in an attempt to frighten them, but this further incited the mob. They again rushed the police who were standing guard outside the building, broke through their lines, and entered the courthouse through a broken basement door.
It was at this moment that Marshal Eberstein, chief of police, arrived. He asked leaders of the mob to give him a chance to talk to the crowd. He mounted to one of the window sills. Beside him was a recognized chief of the mob. At the request of its leader, the crowd stilled its clamor for a few minutes. Chief Eberstein tried to tell the mob that its mission would best be served by letting justice take its course. The crowd refused to listen. Its members howled so that the chief's voice did not carry more than a few feet. Eberstein ceased his attempt to talk and entered the besieged building.
By 6 p.m., throngs swarmed about the court house on all sides. The crowd wrestled revolvers, badges and caps from policemen. They chased and beat every colored person who ventured into the vicinity. White men who attempted to rescue innocent blacks from unmerited punishment were subjected to physical abuse. The police had lost control of the crowd.
By 7 p.m., most of the policemen had withdrawn to the interior of the court house. There, they joined forces with Michael Clark, sheriff of Douglas County, who had summoned his deputies to the building with the hope of preventing the capture of Brown. The policemen and sheriffs formed their line of last resistance on the fourth floor of the court house.
The police were not successful in their efforts. Before 8 p.m., they discovered that the crowd had set the courthouse building on fire. Its leaders had tapped a nearby gasoline filling station and saturated the lower floors with the flammable liquid.
Shots were fired as the mob pillaged hardware stores in the business district and entered pawnshops, seeking firearms. Police records showed that more than 1,000 revolvers and shotguns were stolen that night. The mob shot at any policeman; seven officers received gunshot wounds, although none of the wounds were serious.
Louis Young, 16 years old, was fatally shot in the stomach while leading a gang up to the fourth floor of the building. Witnesses said the youth was the most intrepid of the mob's leaders.
Pandemonium reigned outside the building. At Seventeenth and Douglas Streets, one block from the court house, James Hiykel, a 34-year-old businessman, was shot and killed.
The crowd continued to strike the courthouse with bullets and rocks. Spectators were shot. Participants inflicted minor wounds upon themselves. Women were thrown to the ground and trampled. Blacks were dragged from streetcars and beaten.
About 11 o'clock, when the frenzy was at its height, Mayor Edward Smith came out of the east door of the courthouse into Seventeenth Street. He had been in the burning building for hours. As he emerged from the doorway, a shot rang out.
"He shot me. Mayor Smith shot me," a young man in the uniform of a United States soldier yelled. The crowd surged toward the mayor. He fought them. One man hit the mayor on the head with a baseball bat. Another slipped the noose of a rope around his neck. The crowd started to drag him away.
"If you must hang somebody, then let it be me," the mayor said.
The mob dragged the mayor into Harney Street. A woman reached out and tore the noose from his neck. Men in the mob replaced it. Spectators wrestled the mayor from his captors and placed him in a police automobile. The throng overturned the car and grabbed him again. Once more, the rope encircled the mayor's neck. He was carried to Sixteenth and Harney Streets. There he was hanged from the metal arm of a traffic signal tower.
Mayor Smith was suspended in the air when State Agent Ben Danbaum drove a high-powered automobile into the throng right to the base of the signal tower. In the car with Danbaum were City Detectives Al Anderson, Charles Van Deusen and Lloyd Toland. They grasped the mayor and Russell Norgard untied the noose. The detectives brought the mayor to Ford Hospital. There he lingered between life and death for several days, finally recovering. "They shall not get him. Mob rule will not prevail in Omaha," the mayor kept muttering during his delirium.
Meanwhile the plight of the police in the court house had become desperate. The fire had licked its way to the third floor. The officers faced the prospect of roasting to death. Appeals for help to the crowd below brought only bullets and curses. The mob frustrated all attempts to raise ladders to the imprisoned police. "Bring Brown with you and you can come down," somebody in the crowd shouted.
On the second floor of the building, three policemen and a newspaper reporter were imprisoned in a safety vault, whose thick metal door the mob had shut. The four men hacked their way out through the court house wall. The mob shot at them as they squirmed out of the stifling vault.
The gases of formaldehyde added to the terrors of the men imprisoned within the flaming building. Several jars of the powerful chemical had burst on the stairway. Its deadly fumes mounted to the upper floors. Two policemen were overcome. Their companions could do nothing to alleviate their sufferings.
Sheriff Clark led his prisoners (there were 121 of them) to the roof. Will Brown, for whom the mob was howling, became hysterical. Blacks, fellow prisoners of the hunted man, tried to throw him off the roof. Deputy Sheriffs Hoye and McDonald foiled the attempt.
Sheriff Clark ordered that female prisoners be taken from the building due to their distress. They ran down the burning staircases clad only in prison pajamas. Some of them fainted on the way. Members of the mob escorted them through the smoke and flames. Black women as well as white women were helped to safety.
The mob poured more gasoline into the building. They cut every line of hose that firemen laid from nearby hydrants. The flames were rapidly lapping their way upward. It seemed like certain cremation for the prisoners and their protectors.
Then three slips of paper were thrown from the fourth floor on the west side of the building. On one piece was scrawled: "The judge says he will give up Negro Brown. He is in dungeon. There are 100 white prisoners on the roof. Save them."
Another note read: "Come to the fourth floor of the building and we will hand the negro over to you."
The mob in the street shrieked its delight at the last message. Boys and young men placed firemen's ladders against the building. They mounted to the second story. One man had a heavy coil of new rope on his back. Another had a shotgun.
Two or three minutes after the unidentified athletes had climbed to the fourth floor, a mighty shout and a fusillade of shots were heard from the south side of the building.
Will Brown had been captured. A few minutes more and his lifeless body was hanging from a telephone post at Eighteenth and Harney Streets. Hundreds of revolvers and shotguns were fired at the corpse as it dangled in mid-air. Then, the rope was cut. Brown's body was tied to the rear end of an automobile. It was dragged through the streets to Seventeenth and Dodge Streets, four blocks away. The oil from red lanterns used as danger signals for street repairs was poured on the corpse. It was burned. Members of the mob hauled the charred remains through the business district for several hours.
Sheriff Clark said that Negro prisoners hurled Brown into the hands of the mob as its leaders approached the stairway leading to the county jail. Newspapers have quoted alleged leaders of the mob as saying that Brown was shoved at them through a blinding smoke by persons whom they could not see.
The lawlessness continued for several hours after Brown had been lynched. The police patrol was burned. The police emergency automobile was burned. Three times, the mob went to the city jail. The third time its leaders announced that they were going to burn it. Soldiers arrived before they could carry out their threat.
The riot lasted until 3 a.m., on the morning of September 29. At that hour, federal troops, under command of Colonel John E. Morris of the Twentieth Infantry, arrived from Fort Omaha and Fort Crook. Troops manning machine guns were placed in the heart of Omaha's business district; in North Omaha, the center of the black community, to protect citizens there; and in South Omaha, to prevent more mobs from forming. Major General Leonard Wood, commander of the Central Department, came the next day to Omaha by order of Secretary of War Newton D. Baker. Peace was enforced by 1,600 soldiers.
Martial law was not formally proclaimed in Omaha, but it was effectively enacted throughout the city. By the request of City Commissioner W.G. Ure, who was acting mayor, Wood took over control over the police department, too.
On October 1, 1919 Brown was laid to rest in Omaha's Potters Field. The interment log listed only one word next to his name: "Lynched".[7]
The Omaha Riot was denounced throughout the country. The arrest and prosecution of mob leaders was widely demanded. Police and military authorities apprehended 100 of the participants on charges ranging from murder to arson and held them for trial. The Army presence in Omaha was the largest in response to any of the race riots with 70 officers and 1,222 enlisted men. By early October, the emergency had passed and the Army contingent declined to two regiments by the middle of the month.
Within two weeks a grand jury was convened to investigate the riot. After a six week session, the grand jury issued a report that criticized the Smith administration for ineffective leadership and police incompetence. Army witnesses testified to their belief that more prompt police action could have controlled the riot.[8]
General Wood initially blamed the disturbance on the Industrial Workers of the World, as part of the Red Scare then prevalent in the US. This interpretation was not supported by the evidence, however. Wood's actions in rebuilding the police force, investigating the riot and arresting the ring leaders showed a greater appreciation of the situation. Omaha police identified another 300 people wanted for questioning, including Loebeck's brother who had disappeared.
Reverend Charles E. Cobbey, the pastor of the First Christian Church, blamed the Omaha Bee for inflaming the situation. He was reported to have said, "It is the belief of many that the entire responsibility for the outrage can be placed at the feet of a few men and one Omaha paper." The inflammatory yellow journalism of the Bee is credited by several historians for stoking emotions for the riot.[9]
The US Army was critical of the Omaha police for their failing to disperse the crowd before it grew too large. Other critics believe the Army was slow to respond to the crisis; this was a result of communications problems, including the crisis caused by President Woodrow Wilson's having been incapacitated by a stroke. (Requests by the governor for National Guard assistance had to go to the President's office.)
Many within Omaha saw the riot within the context of a Conspiracy Theory, the direct result of alleged conspiracy directed by Omaha political and criminal boss Tom Dennison. A turncoat from Dennison's machine said he had heard Boss Dennison boasting that some of the assailants were white Dennison operatives disguised in blackface. This was corroborated by police reports that one white attacker was still wearing the make-up when apprehended. As in many other Dennison-related cases, no one was ever found guilty for their participation in the riot.[10] A later grand jury trial corroborated this claim, stating "Several reported assaults on white women had actually been perpetrated by whites in blackface." They went on to report that the riot was planned and begun by "the vice element of the city." The riot "was not a casual affair; it was premeditated and planned by those secret and invisible forces that today are fighting you and the men who represent good government."[8]
The event was part of an ongoing racial tension in Omaha in the early 20th century. There were attacks on Greek immigrants in 1909. The migration of many blacks into the city pursuing economic opportunities sparked racial tension in the state. After the Omaha riot, the Ku Klux Klan became established in 1921. Another racial riot took place in North Platte, Nebraska in 1929. There were also violent strikes in the Omaha meat packing industry in 1917 and 1921 and concerns about immigrants from Eastern Europe.
After the riot, the city of Omaha, previously a city in which ethnicities and races were mixed in many neighborhoods, became more segregated. Redlining and restrictive covenants began to be used in new neighborhoods, with African Americans restricted to owning property where they already lived in greatest number, in North Omaha. Although segregation has not been legally enforced for generations, a majority of Omaha's black population still lives in North Omaha.
In the fall of 1919, Dr. George E. Haynes, an educator employed as Director of Negro Economics at the U.S. Department of Labor, produced a report on that year's racial violence designed to serve as the basis for an investigation by the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. It cataloged 26 separate riots on the part of whites attacking blacks in widely scattered communities.[1]
Together with other riots in 1919, the Omaha riot prompted the United States Senate Committee on Judiciary in October 1919 to call for an investigation of urban, industrial and racial problems. The committee members recognized lynchings as a justified cause of bitterness in the black community, and enumerated the riots of 1919 and lynchings as among the factors for its investigation. They called for leaders of the white and black communities to work toward reconciliation.[citation needed] In September 1918, President Woodrow Wilson had made a speech against lynching and mob violence.[citation needed] Although a few years later Congress tried to pass a law making lynching a Federal offense, action was blocked by Southern Democrats.[citation needed]
In 1998, playwright Max Sparber had his play about the riot produced by the Blue Barn Theatre in the rotunda of the Douglas County Courthouse. The play, titled Minstrel Show; Or, The Lynching of William Brown, caused a minor controversy. State Senator Ernie Chambers condemned the play for using the device of fictional African-American blackface performers as the story's narrators. He called for a black boycott of the play. Nonetheless, the play performed to sold-out houses and later enjoyed productions in other cities.
In 2007 the New Jersey Repertory Company presented Sparber's Minstrel Show or the Lynching of William Brown in Long Branch. The cast included Kelcey Watson from Omaha and Spencer Scott Barros from New York City. Both actors had performed in previous productions of the play. It was directed by Rob Urbinati.
In 2009, California engineer Chris Hebert learned about the Omaha riot and the lynching of Will Brown after viewing a TV documentary on Henry Fonda, which mentioned the actor's having been profoundly affected by the riot as a young Omaha native.[11] Describing himself as having "tears in my eyes" after reading more on the riot and Brown's death, Hebert further discovered that Brown still lay in the unmarked grave he was buried in at Potter's Field. After consultation with staff at Omaha's Forest Lawn Memorial Park, who located the grave after a lengthy search on June 11,[12] Hebert donated money for the placement of a permanent memorial for Brown, giving his name, date and cause of death and the motto 'Lest we forget.' In an open letter to the people of Omaha, Hebert described his feelings behind his effort:
It is a shame that it took these deaths and others to raise public consciousness and effect the changes that we enjoy today. When I discovered that William Brown was buried in a pauper's grave, I did not want William Brown to be forgotten. I wanted him to have a headstone to let people know that it was because of people like him that we enjoy our freedoms today. The lesson learned from his death should be taught to all. That is, we cannot have the protections guaranteed by the Constitution without law. There is no place for vigilantism in our society.
This article incorporates text from Pamphlet, by The Educational Publishing Company, a publication from 1919 now in the public domain in the United States.
|
|
To comply with Wikipedia's lead section guidelines, the introduction of this article may need to be rewritten. Please discuss this issue on the talk page and read the layout guide to make sure the section will be inclusive of all essential details. (May 2012) |
High-speed rail in China (simplified Chinese: 中国高速铁路; traditional Chinese: 中國高速鐵路; pinyin: Zhōngguó gāosù tiělù) refers to any commercial train service in China with an average speed of 200 km/h (124 mph) or higher. By that measure, China has the world's longest high-speed rail (HSR) network with about 9,676 km (6,012 mi)[1] of routes in service as of June 2011 including 3,515 km (2,184 mi) of rail lines with top speeds of 486 km/h (302 mph).[2] In 2010, the BBC reported that by 2012, China was expected to have more high-speed railway track than the rest of the world combined.[3]
High-speed rail service in China was introduced on April 18, 2007, and daily ridership has grown from 237,000 in 2007 and 349,000 in 2008 to 492,000 in 2009 and 796,000 in 2010.[4] China's high speed rail network consists of upgraded conventional railways, newly built high-speed passenger designated lines (PDLs), and the world's first high-speed commercial magnetic levitation (maglev) line. The country has been undergoing an HSR building boom. With generous funding from the Chinese government's economic stimulus program, 17,000 km (11,000 mi) of high-speed lines are now under construction. In early 2011, the HSR network was expected to reach 13,073 km (8,123 mi) by the end of the year[5] and 25,000 km (16,000 mi) by the end of 2015.[6] Notable examples of HSR lines include the Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway, a passenger-dedicated trunk line opened in June 2011, that reduced the 1,318 km (819 mi) journey between the largest cities in China to under 5 hours, the Beijing-Tianjin Intercity Railway, an intercity express line opened in 2008, that shortened the 117 km (73 mi) commute between the two largest cities in northern China to 30 minutes and the Shanghai Maglev Train, an airport rail link service.
China's initial high speed trains were imported or built under technology transfer agreements with foreign train-makers including Siemens, Bombardier and Kawasaki Heavy Industries. Chinese engineers then re-designed internal train components and built indigenous trains that can reach operational speeds of up to 380 km/h (240 mph).[7][8] Foreign trainmakers continue to sell certain components but no longer supply train sets for China's high speed trains.[9] Most of the China Railway High-speed (CRH) train components are manufactured by local Chinese suppliers, with only a few parts imported.[citation needed] Reports differ over the extent to which Chinese engineers absorbed or expropriated foreign technology in building indigenous train sets and signal systems.[10][11] China currently holds close to 1,000 local and international patents for high speed rail technology.[citation needed]
The pace of China's high-speed rail expansion slowed sharply in 2011 after the removal of Chinese Railways Minister Liu Zhijun in February pending investigation for corruption and a fatal high-speed railway accident near Wenzhou in July. Concerns about HSR safety, high ticket prices, low ridership, financial sustainability of high speed rail projects and environmental impact have drawn greater scrutiny from the Chinese press.[12] Top operational speed of HSR trains on lines previously operating at 350 km/h were lowered to 300 km/h and those running at 250 km/h were lowered to 200 km/h.[13][14] By late summer 2011, state banks began to cut back lending to railway construction projects.[15] By October 2011, work had halted on 10,000 km of track under construction due to shortage of funding.[16] In late October and early November 2011, the Ministry of Railways raised 250 billion RMB in debt and loans, and construction resumed on a number of lines.[17]
Contents |
State planning for China's high speed railway began in the early 1990s. The Ministry of Railways (MOR) submitted a proposal to build a high speed railway between Beijing and Shanghai to the National People's Congress in December 1990.[18] At the time, the existing Beijing-Shanghai railway was already reaching capacity, and the proposal was jointly studied by the Science & Technology Commission, State Planning Commission, State Economic & Trade Commission, and the MOR.[18] In December 1994, the State Council commissioned a feasibility study for the line.[18] Policy planners debated the necessity and economic viability of high-speed rail service. Supporters argued that high-speed rail would boost future economic growth. Opponents noted that high-speed rail in other countries were expensive and mostly unprofitable. Overcrowding on existing rail lines, they said, could be solved by expanding capacity through higher speed and frequency of service. In 1995, Premier Li Peng announced that preparatory work on the Beijing Shanghai HSR would begin in the 9th Five Year Plan (1996–2000), but construction was not scheduled until the first decade of the 21st century.
In the middle of the 1990s, China's trains used to travel at a top speed of around 60 km/h (37 mph).[19] To increase railway transportation speed and capacity, the Ministry of Railways (MOR) has continuously increased the speed of its commercial train service on existing lines. From 1997 to 2007, the speed of China's railways increased six times, boosting passenger train speed on 22,000 km (14,000 mi) of tracks to 120 km/h (75 mph), on 14,000 km (8,700 mi) of tracks to 160 km/h (99 mph), on 2,876 km (1,787 mi) of tracks to 200 km/h (124 mph) and on 846 km (526 mi) of tracks to 250 km/h (155 mph).[20]
The MOR's initial design for the Jinghu high-speed line was completed and led to a suggestion report for state approval in June 1998. The construction plan finally been determined at 2004 beginning after five years' debate on whether to use rail track or the maglev technology.[21][22]
On 7 January 2004, at a regular meeting of the State Council chaired by Premier Wen Jiabao, the nation’s “medium-and-long term plan of railway network” was discussed and passed in principle. The plan comprised a high-speed railway network consisting of four north-south lines and four west-east lines, with the Beijing-Shanghai railway placed at the top.[22]
When China first decided to develop high speed rail, the original idea was to research and develop domestic technology to reach a world standard. In 1998, China started the construction of its first high speed rail, the Qinhuangdao–Shenyang Passenger Dedicated Line, which was opened in 2003, with a designed speed of 200 km/h (124 mph), and several prototypes meant to reach 300 km/h (186 mph) were tested here, including “China Star”, “Pioneer” and latterly “Changbai Mountain”. However, the fastest operating speed achieved by “Changbai Mountain” was only 180 km/h (112 mph). “China Star” reached 321 km/h (199 mph) in 2003 during a test run but performed poor in daily services.
By 2007, the top speed of Qinshen PDL was increased to 250 km/h (155 mph). On 19 April 2008, Hefei–Nanjing PDL opened, with a top speed of 250 km/h (155 mph). On 1 August 2008, the Beijing–Tianjin Intercity Line was opened, and its top speed reached 350 km/h (217 mph). New trainsets, CRH2C and CRH3C, with designed top operating speed 350 km/h (217 mph), were first put into commercial service. Currently the fastest CRH Service is on the Wuhan–Guangzhou line, opened on 26 December 2009. It travels 968 kilometres (601 mi) in 3 hours reaching top speeds of 350 kilometres per hour (217 mph) and averaging 310 kilometres per hour (190 mph).
On 26 October 2010, China opened its 15th high speed rail, the Shanghai–Hangzhou line, and the CRH380A trainset manufactured by CSR Sifang started regular service. the Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway opened to the public in June 2011, The railway line is the first one in the world with designed top speed of 380 km/h (236 mph) in commercial service and uses the new CRH380 trainsets.[23][24]
China has the world’s longest high-speed rail network with about 8,358 km (5,193 mi)[25] of routes capable for at least 200 km/h (124 mph) running in service as of January 2011, including 2,197 km (1,365 mi) of rail lines with top speeds of 350 km/h (217 mph).[26] According to the MOR's “Mid-to-Long Term Railway Network Plan (revised in 2008)”, the National High-Speed Rail Grid is composed of 8 high-speed rail corridors, 4 north-south corridors and 4 east-west corridors; together with some less important lines the total length will be about 12,000 km (7,456 mi).
In the last year of 2010, China committed investment of CN¥709.1 billion (US$107.9 billion) in railway construction. In the coming year of 2011, China is planning to invest some CN¥700 billion (US$106 billion) in railway construction, start construction of 70 railway projects, including 15 high-speed rail projects. 4,715 kilometres (2,930 mi) of new high-speed railways will be opened, and by the end of this year, China will have 13,073 kilometres (8,123 mi) of railways capable for 200+ km/h running, one year ahead of the original schedule.[27]
According to China Securities Journal, China plans to invest $451 to $602 billion in its high-speed rail network between 2011 to 2015.
In April 2011, the Railway Minister Sheng Guangzu announced that, due to costs concern and increasing the margin of safety, the top speeds of all types of wheeled trains will be reduced to 300 km/h (186 mph), starting from 1 July 2011.[28] However, an exception applies for some lines, including Beijing–Tianjin and Shanghai–Hangzhou, which will still run at up to 350 km/h (217 mph), according to China Railway Ministry.[citation needed]
On 23 July 2011, around 40 people died and 191 were injured in a train accident on a China’s high-speed line raising doubts about China’s high speed system safety.[29][30][31] The accident occurred when a train traveling near Wenzhou lost power after it was struck by lightning. Signals also malfunctioned, causing another train to rear-end the stationary train.[30][32][33][34][35]
Following the deadly crash, China plans to suspend new railway project approvals and launch safety checks on existing equipment.[36][37]
In 1993, commercial train service in China averaged only 48 km/h (30 mph)[38] and was steadily losing market share to airline and highway travel on the country's expanding network of expressways. The MOR focused modernization efforts on increasing the service speed and capacity on existing lines through double-tracking, electrification, improvements in grade (through tunnels and bridges), reductions in turn curvature, and installation of continuous welded rail. Through five rounds of "speed-up" campaigns in April 1997, October 1998, October 2000, November 2001, and April 2004, passenger service on 7,700 km (4,800 mi) of existing tracks was upgraded to reach sub-high speeds of 160 km/h (100 mph).[39] A notable example is the Guangzhou-Shenzhen Railway, which in December 1994 became the first line in China to offer sub-high speed service of 160 km/h using domestically produced DF-class diesel locomotives. The line was electrified in 1998, and Swedish-made X 2000 trains increased service speed to 200 km/h (124 mph). After the completion of a third track in 2000 and a fourth in 2007, the line became the first in China to run high-speed passenger and freight service on separate tracks. The completion of the sixth and final round of the "Speed Up" campaigns in April 2007 brought HSR service to more existing lines: 423 km (263 mi) capable of 250 km/h (155 mph) train service and 3,002 km (1,865 mi) capable of 200 km/h (124 mph).[40] In all, travel speed was increased on 22,000 extended km (13,700 extended mi), or one fifth, of the national rail network, and the average speed of a passenger train improved to 70 km/h. The introduction of more non-stop service between large cities also helped to reduce travel time. The non-stop express train from Beijing to Fuzhou shortened travel time from 33.5 to less than 20 hours.[41] In addition to track and scheduling improvements, the MOR also deployed faster CRH series trains. During the Sixth Railway Speed Up Campaign, 52 CRH trainsets (CRH1, CRH2 and CRH5) entered into operation. The new trains reduced travel time between Beijing and Shanghai by two hours to just under 10 hours.
Higher-speed express train service allowed more trains to share the tracks and improved rail transport capacity. But high-speed trains often have to share tracks with heavy freight—in some cases with as little as 5 minutes headway.[41] To attain higher speeds and transport capacity, planners began to consider passenger-dedicated HSR lines on a grand scale.
The development of HSR network in China was initially held up by a debate over the type of track technology. In June 1998, at a State Council meeting with the Chinese Academies of Chinese Academies of Sciences and Engineering, Premier Zhu Rongji asked whether the high speed railway between Beijing and Shanghai still being planned could use maglev technology.[42] At the time, planners were divided between using high-speed trains with wheels that run on conventional standard gauge tracks or magnetic levitation trains that run on special maglev tracks for a new national high-speed rail network.
Maglev received a big boost in 2000 when the Shanghai Municipal Government agreed to purchase a turnkey TransRapid train system from Germany for the 30.5 km (19.0 mi) rail link connecting Shanghai Pudong International Airport and the city. In 2004, the Shanghai Maglev Train became the world's first commercially operated high-speed maglev. It remains the fastest commercial train in the world with peak speeds of 431 km/h (268 mph) and makes the 30.5 km (19.0 mi) in less than 7.5 minutes.
Despite unmatched advantage in speed, the maglev has not gained widespread use in China's high-speed rail network due to high cost, German refusal to share technology and concerns about safety. The price tag of the Shanghai Maglev was believed to be $1.3 billion and was partially financed by the German government. The refusal of the Transrapid Consortium to share technology and source production in China made large-scale maglev production much more costly than high-speed train technology for conventional lines. Finally, residents living along the proposed maglev route have raised health concerns about electromagnetic radiation emitted by the trains. These concerns have prevented construction to begin on the proposed extension of the maglev to Hangzhou. Even the more modest plan to extend the maglev to Shanghai's other airport, Hongqiao, has been stalled. Instead, a conventional subway line was built to connect the two airports, and a conventional high-speed rail line was built between Shanghai and Hangzhou.
While the maglev was drawing attention to Shanghai, conventional track HSR technology was being tested on the newly completed Qinhuangdao-Shenyang (Qinshen) Passenger Railway. This 405 km (252 mi) standard gauge, dual-track, electrified line was built between 1999 and 2003. In June 2002, a domestically made DJF2 train set a record of 292.8 km/h (181.9 mph) on the track. The China Star (DJJ2) train followed the same September with a new record of 321 km/h (199 mph). The line supports commercial train service at speeds of 200–250 km/h, and has become a segment of the rail corridor between Beijing and the Northeast China. The Qinshen Line demonstrates the greater compatibility of HSR on conventional track with the rest of China's standard gauge rail network.
In 2006, the State Council in its Mid-to-Long Term Railway Development Plan, adopted conventional track HSR technology over maglev. This decision ended the debate cleared the way for rapid construction of standard gauge, passenger dedicated HSR lines in China.
Despite setting speed records on test tracks, the DJJ2, DJF2 and other domestically produced high speed trains were insufficiently reliable for commercial operation.[43] The State Council turned to advanced technology abroad but made clear in directives that China's HSR expansion cannot only benefit foreign economies.[43] China's expansion must also be used to develop its own high-speed train building capacity through technology transfers. The State Council, MOR and state-owned train builders, the China North Car (CNR) and China South Car (CSR) used China's large market and competition among foreign train-makers to induce technology transfers.
In 2003, the MOR was believed to favor Japan's Shinkansen technology, especially the 700 series, which was later exported to Taiwan.[43] The Japanese government touted the 40-year track record of the Shinkansen and offered favorable financing. A Japanese report envisioned a winner-take all scenario in which the winning technology provider would supply China's trains for over 8,000 km of high-speed rail.[44] However, Chinese citizens angry with Japan's World War II atrocities organized a web campaign to oppose the awarding of HSR contracts to Japanese companies. The protests gathered over a million signatures and politicized the issue.[45] The MOR delayed the decision, broadened the bidding and adopted a diversified approach to adopting foreign high-speed train technology.
In June 2004, the MOR solicited bids to make 200 high speed train sets that can run 200 km/h.[43] Alstom of France, Siemens of Germany, Bombardier Transportation based in Germany and a Japanese consortium led by Kawasaki all submitted bids. With the exception of Siemens which refused to lower its demand of RMB(¥) 350 million per train set and €390 million for the technology transfer, the other three were all awarded portions of the contract.[43] All had to adapt their HSR train-sets to China's own common standard and assemble units through local joint ventures (JV) or cooperate with Chinese manufacturers. Bombardier, through its JV with CSR's Sifang Locomotive and Rolling Stock Co (CSR Sifang), Bombardier Sifang (Qingdao) Transportation Ltd (BST). won an order for 40 eight-car train sets based on Bombardier's Regina design.[46] These trains, designated CRH1A, were delivered in 2006. Kawasaki won an order for 60 train sets based on its E2 Series Shinkansen for ¥9.3 billion.[47] Of the 60 train sets, three were directly delivered from Nagoya, Japan, six were kits assembled at CSR Sifang Locomotive & Rolling Stock, and the remaining 51 were made in China using transferred technology with domestic and imported parts.[48] They are known as CRH2A. Alstom also won an order for 60 train sets based on the New Pendolino developed by Alstom-Ferroviaria in Italy. The order had a similar delivery structure with three shipped directly from Savigliano along with six kits assembled by CNR's Changchun Railway Vehicles, and the rest locally made with transferred technology and some imported parts.[49] Trains with Alstom technology carry the CRH5 designation.
The following year, Siemens reshuffled its bidding team, lowered prices, joined the bidding for 300 km/h trains and won a 60-train set order.[43] It supplied the technology for the CRH3C, based on the ICE3 (class 403) design, to CNR's Tangshan Railway Vehicle Co. Ltd. The transferred technology includes assembly, body, bogie, traction current transforming, traction transformers, traction motors, traction control, brake systems, and train control networks.
Achieving indigenous high-speed rail technology has been a major goal of Chinese state planners. Chinese train-makers, after receiving transferred foreign technology, have been able to achieve a considerable degree of self-sufficiency in making the next generation of high-speed trains by developing indigenous capability to produce key parts and improvising upon foreign designs.
Examples of technology transfer include Mitsubishi Electric’s MT205 traction motor and ATM9 transformer to CSR Zhuzhou Electric, Hitachi’s YJ92A traction motor and Alstom’s YJ87A Traction motor to CNR Yongji Electric, Siemens’ TSG series pantograph to Zhuzhou Gofront Electric. Most of the components of the CRH trains manufactured by Chinese companies were from local suppliers, with only a few parts imported.[citation needed]
For foreign train-makers, technology transfer is an important part of gaining market access in China. Bombardier, the first foreign train-maker to form a joint venture in China, has been sharing technology for the manufacture of railway passenger cars and rolling stock since 1998. Zhang Jianwei, President and Chief Country Representative of Bombardier China, stated that in a 2009 interview, “Whatever technology Bombardier has, whatever the China market needs, there is no need to ask. Bombardier transfers advanced and mature technology to China, which we do not treat as an experimental market.”[51] Unlike other series which have imported prototypes, all CRH1 trains have been assembled at Bombardier’s joint-venture with CSR, Bombardier Sifang in Qingdao.
Kawasaki’s cooperation with CSR did not last as long. Within two years of cooperation with Kawasaki to produce 60 CRH2A sets, CSR began in 2008 to build CRH2B, CRH2C and CRH2E models at its Sifang plant independently without assistance from Kawasaki.[52] According to CSR president Zhang Chenghong, CSR "made the bold move of forming a systemic development platform for high-speed locomotives and further upgrading its design and manufacturing technology. Later, we began to independently develop high-speed CRH trains with a maximum velocity of 300–350 kilometers per hour, which eventually rolled off the production line in December 2007."[53] Since then, CSR has ended its cooperation with Kawasaki.[54] Kawasaki is currently challenging China's high-speed rail project for patent theft.[55]
Between June and September 2005, the Ministry of Railways launched bidding for high speed trains with a top speed of 350 km/h, as most of the main high speed rail lines were designed for top speeds of 350 km/h or higher. Along with CRH3C, produced by Siemens and CNR Tangshan, CSR Sifang bid 60 sets of CRH2C.
In 2007, travel time from Beijing to Shanghai was about 10 hours at a top speed of 200 km/h in the upgrade Beijing-Shanghai Railway. To increase transport capacity, the Ministry of Railways ordered 70 16-car trainsets from CSR Sifang and BST, including 10 sets of CRH1B and 20 sets of CRH2B seating trains, 20 sets of CRH1E and 20 sets of CRH2E sleeper trains.
Construction of the high-speed railway between Beijing and Shanghai, the world's first high speed rail with designed speed 380 km/h, began on April 18, 2008. In the same year, the Ministry of Science and the Ministry of Railway agreed to a joint action plan for the indigenous innovation of high-speed trains in China. The Railway Ministry then launched the CRH1-350 (Bombardier and BST, designated as CRH380D/DL), CRH2-350 (CSR, designated as CRH380A/AL), and CRH3-350 (CNR and Siemens, designated as CRH380B/BL & CRH380CL), to develop new generation of CRH trains with top operation speed 380 km/h. A total of 400 new generation trains were ordered. CRH380A entered service on the Shanghai-Hangzhou High-Speed Railway on October 26, 2010. The CRH380A is the first indigenous high speed train of the CRH series.[56]
On October 19, 2010, the Ministry of Railways declared the beginning of research and development on "super-speed" railway technology, which would increase the average speed of trains to over 500 kilometers per hour.[57]
In February 2011, Railway Minister Liu Zhijun, a key proponent of HSR expansion in China, was removed from office on charges of corruption. The Economist estimates Liu accepted Y1 billion of bribes ($152 million) in connection with railway construction projects.[58] However only 3 million Yuan has been proven so far.[59] Investigators have found evidence that another Y187 million ($28.5 million) was misappropriated from the $33 billion Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway in 2010.[60] Another top official in the Railways Ministry, Zhang Shuguang, was also sacked for corruption according to the Economist.[58] Zhang is estimated to have misappropriated to his personal overseas accounts the equivalent of $2.8 billion. [61]
After the political shake-up, concerns about HSR safety, high ticket prices, financial sustainability and environmental impact received greater scrutiny in the Chinese press.[12][13] In April 2011, the new Minister of Railways Sheng Guangzu said that due to corruption, safety may have been compromised on some construction projects and completion dates may have to be pushed back.[58] In an interview the People's Daily, Sheng announced that all trains in the high speed rail network will be operated at a maximum speed of 300 km/h (186 mph).[12][62] This was in response to concerns over safety, low ridership due to high ticket prices,[63] and high energy usage.[13] On June 13, 2011, the Ministry of Railways clarified in a press conference that the speed reduction was not due to safety concerns but to offer more affordable tickets for trains at 250 km/h and increase ridership. Higher speed train travel uses greater energy and imposes more wear on expensive machinery. Railway officials chose to run faster trains at 300 km/h instead of 350 km/h to achieve closer train spacing and greater capacity utilization. Trains on the Beijing-Tianjin high-speed line and a few other inter-city lines will continue to run at a top speed of 350 km/h.[64] In May 2011, China's Environmental Protection Ministry ordered the halting of construction and operation of two high-speed lines that failed to pass environmental impact tests.[65][66] In June, the Railway Ministry maintained that high-speed rail construction is not slowing down.[67] CRH380A trainsets on the Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway can reach a top operational speed of 380 km/h (240 mph) but run at 300 km/h.[7][8] Under pressure from all sides, the National Audit Office (NAO) carried out an extensive investigation into the building quality of all high speed rail lines. As of March 2011, no major quality defects had been found in the system.[68] Foreign manufacturers involved in Shanghai-Beijing high-speed link clearly stated in their contract that the maximum operational speed was 300 km/h.[69] From July 20, 2011, the frequency of train service from Jinan to Beijing and Tianjin was reduced due to low occupancy renewing concerns about the demand and profitability for high speed services.[70] High numbers of service failures in the first month of operation drove passengers back to the existing slower rail services and air travel with airline ticket prices rising again from reduced competition.
On July 23, 2011, two high-speed trains collided on the Ningbo–Taizhou–Wenzhou Railway in Lucheng District of Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province. Several carriages derailed.[71] State-run Chinese media confirmed 40 deaths, and at least 192 people were hospitalised, including 12 who were severely injured.[72][73][74] The Wenzhou train accident and the lack of accountability by railway officials caused a public uproar and heightened concerns about the safety of China's high-speed rail system.[75][76] Quality and safety concerns will likely have a serious impact on China's ambition to export cheap high speed train technology to other countries.[77]
The Wenzhou train collision had an immediate impact on China's high-speed rail program. The Chinese government formed a commission to investigate the accident with a directive to report its findings in September 2011.[78] On August 10, 2011, the Chinese government announced that it was suspending approvals of any new high-speed rail lines pending the outcome of the investigation.[79][80] The Minister of Railways announced further cuts in the speed of Chinese high-speed trains, with the speed of the second-tier 'D' trains reduced from 250 km/h (155 mph) to 200 km/h (124 mph).[81] The speed of the remaining 350 km/h trains between Shanghai and Hangzhou was reduced to 300 km/h as of August 28, 2011.[82] To stimulate ridership, on August 16, 2011 ticket prices on Chinese high-speed trains were reduced by 5 percent.[83] From July to September, high-speed rail ridership in China fell by nearly 30 million to 151 million trips.[16]
China's high speed rail expansion is entirely managed, planned and financed by the government. After committing to conventional-track high speed rail in 2006, the state has embarked on an ambitious campaign to build passenger-dedicated high-speed rail lines, which accounts for a large part of the government's growing budget for rail construction. Total investment in new rail lines grew from $14 billion in 2004 to $22.7 and $26.2 billion in 2006 and 2007.[84] In response to the global economic recession, the government accelerated the pace of HSR expansion to stimulate economic growth. Total investments in new rail lines including HSR reached $49.4 billion in 2008 and $88 billion in 2009.[84] In all, the state plans to spend $300 billion to build a 25,000 km (16,000 mi) HSR network by 2020.[85][86]
Critics both in China and abroad have questioned the necessity of having an expensive high-speed rail system in a largely developing country, where most workers cannot afford to pay a premium for faster travel.[85][86] The government has justified the expensive undertaking as promoting a number of policy objectives. HSR provides fast, reliable and comfortable means of transporting large numbers of travelers in a densely populated country over long distances,[87] which:
China's high-speed rail construction projects are highly capital intensive. About 40-50% of financing is provided by the national government through lending by state owned banks and financial institutions, another 40% by the bonds issued by the Ministry of Railway (MOR) and the remaining 10-20% by provincial and local governments.[15][87] The MOR, through its financing arm, the China Rail Investment Corp, issued an estimated ¥1 trillion (US$150 billion in 2010 dollars) in debt to finance HSR construction from 2006 to 2010,[91] including ¥310 billion in the first 10 months of 2010.[92] CRIC has also raised some capital through equity offerings; in the spring of 2010, CRIC sold a 4.5 percent stake in the Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway to the Bank of China for ¥6.6 billion and a 4.537 percent stake to the public for ¥6 billion.[91] CRIC retained 56.2 percent ownership on that line. As of 2010, the CRIC-bonds are considered to be relatively safe investments because they are backed by assets (the railways) and implicitly by the government.
The following table shows the construction cost of the HSR lines in operation.
Line | Length (km) |
Designed Speed (km/h) |
Total const. cost (¥ billion) |
Unit cost (¥ million/km) |
Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qinshen PDL | 404 | 250 | 15.7 | 38.9 | [93] |
Hening PDL | 166 | 250 | 25 | 150.6 | [94] |
Jiaoji PDL | 364 | 250 | 11 | 30.21 | [95] |
Shitai PDL | 190 | 250 | 17.075 | 89.87 | [96] |
Hewu PDL | 351 | 250 | 16.8 | 47.86 | [97] |
Yongtaiwen PFL | 268 | 250 | 16.28 | 60.75 | [98] |
Wenfu PFL | 298 | 250 | 18 | 60.4 | [99] |
Fuxia PFL | 275 | 250 | 15.259 | 55.49 | [100] |
Chengguan PDL | 65 | 250 | 13.3 | 204.62 | [101] |
Changjiu ICL | 131 | 250 | 5.832 | 44.52 | [102] |
Changji ICL | 111 | 250 | 9.6 | 86.49 | [103] |
Hainan ER ICL | 308 | 250 | 20.2 | 65.58 | [104] |
Jingjin ICL | 115 | 350 | 21.5 | 186.96 | [105] |
Wuguang PDL | 968 | 350 | 116.6 | 120 | [106] |
Zhengxi PDL | 455 | 350 | 35.31 | 77.6 | [107] |
Huning HSR | 301 | 350 | 50 | 166.11 | [108] |
Huhang PDL | 150 | 350 | 29.29 | 195.27 | [109] |
Jinghu HSR | 1318 | 350 | 220.9 | 167.6 | [110] |
Large construction debt-loads require significant revenues from rider fares, subsidies, and/or other sources of income, such as advertising, to repay. Despite impressive ridership figures, virtually every completed line has incurred losses in its first years of operation. For example, the Beijing–Tianjin Intercity Railway in its two full years of operation, delivered over 41 million rides. The line cost ¥20.42 billion to build, and ¥1.8 billion per annum to operate, including ¥0.6 billion in interest payments on its ¥10 billion of loan obligations.[111] The terms of the loans range from 5–10 years at interest rates of 6.3 to 6.8 percent.[111] In its first year of operation from August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009, the line carried 18.7 million riders and generated ¥1.1 billion in revenues, which resulted in a loss of ¥0.7 billion. In the second year, ridership rose to 22.3 million and revenues improved to ¥1.4 billion, which narrowed losses somewhat to below ¥0.5 billion.[111] To break even, the line must deliver 30 million rides annually.[111] To be able to repay principal, ridership would need to exceed 40 million.[111] As of September 2010, daily ridership averaged 69,000 or an annual rate of 25.2 million.[111] The line has a capacity of delivering 100 million rides annually[112] and initial estimated repayment period of 16 years.[111]
The Shijiazhuang-Taiyuan PDL lost ¥0.8 billion in its first year and is set to lose ¥0.9 billion in 2010.[91] The Southeast HSR corridor lost ¥0.377 billion in its first year beginning August 2009.[91] The Zhengzhou-Xian PDL since opening in February 2010 is expected to generate revenues of ¥0.6 billion in its first full year but must make interest payments of ¥1.1 billion. All of these losses must be covered by the operator, which is usually subsidized by local governments.[112]
The MOR faces a debt-repayment peak in 2014.[91] Some economists recommend further subsidies to lower fares and boost ridership and ultimately revenues.[112] Others warn that the financing side of the existing construction and operation model is unsustainable.[112] If the rail-backed loans cannot be fully repaid, they may be refinanced or the banks may seize ownership of the railways.[91] To prevent that eventuality, the MOR is trying to improve management of its rapidly growing HSR holdings.[91]
In the first half of 2011, the MOR as a whole made a profit of ¥4.29 billion and carried a total debt burden of ¥2.09 trillion, equal to about 5% of China’s GDP.[113][114] Earnings from the more profitable freight lines helped to off-set losses by high-speed rail lines. As of years ending 2008, 2009 and 2010, the MOR's debt-to-asset ratio was respectively, 46.81%, 53.06% and 57.44%,[115] and reached 58.58% by mid-year 2011.[15] As of October 12, 2011, the MOR had issued ¥160 billion of debt for the year.[114] But in the late summer, state banks began to cut back on lending to rail construction projects, which reduced funding for existing railway projects. An investigation of 23 railway construction companies in August 2011 revealed that 70% of existing projects had been slowed or halted mainly due to shortage of funding.[15] Affected lines included Xiamen-Shenzhen, Nanning-Guangzhou, Guiyang-Guangzhou, Shijazhuang-Wuhan, Tianjin-Baoding and Shanghai-Kunming high-speed rail lines.[16][113] By October, work had halted on the construction of 10,000 km of track.[16] New projects were put on hold and completion dates for existing projects, including the Tianjin-Baoding, Harbin-Jiamusi, Zhengzhou-Xuzhou and Hainan Ring (West), were pushed back.[15] As of October 2011, the MOR was reportedly concentrating remaining resources on fewer high-speed rail lines and shifting emphasis to more economically viable coal transporting heavy rail.[114]
To ease the credit shortage facing rail construction, the Ministry of Finance announced tax cuts to interest earned on rail construction financing bonds and the State Council ordered state banks to renew lending to rail projects.[16] In late October and November 2011, the Ministry of Railways raised RMB 250 billion in fresh financing and construction resumed on several lines including the Tianjin-Baoding, Xiamen-Shenzhen and Shanghai-Kunming.[17]
China's high-speed rail system project is ambitious[116] and when the major rail lines are completed by 2020, it will become the largest, fastest, and most technologically advanced high-speed railway system in the world.[89] China's Ministry of Railways plans to build 25,000 km (16,000 mi) of high-speed railways with trains reaching speeds of 350 km/h.[89][117] China invested $50 billion on its high-speed rail system in 2009 and the total construction cost of the high-speed rail system is $300 billion.[89] The main operator of regular high-speed train services in the People's Republic of China is China Railway High-Speed (CRH).
China's conventional high-speed railway network is made up of four components:
Most of the rail lines in the latter three categories are now under construction.[118]
Following the sixth round of the "railway speed up campaign" on April 18, 2007, some 6,003 extended km of track could carry trains at speeds of up to 200 km/h. Of these, 848 km could attain 250 km/h. These include the Qinhuangdao-Shenyang (Qinshen) Passenger Railway, and sections of the Qingdao-Jinan (Jiaoji), Shanghai-Kunming (Hukun) between Hangzhou and Zhuzhou, Guangzhou-Shenzhen (Guangshen), Beijing-Shanghai (Jinghu), Beijing-Harbin (Jingha), Beijing-Guangzhou (Jingguang), Longhai between Zhengzhou to Xuzhou, Railways. Upgrade work continues on other lines including the Wuhan-Danyang (Handan), Hunan-Guizhou (Xianggui), and Nanjing-Nantong (Ningqi) Railways.
295 stations have been built or renovated to allow high speed trains.[119]
The centerpiece of the Ministry of Railway (MOR)'s expansion into high-speed rail is a new national high-speed rail grid that is overlaid onto the existing railway network. According to the MOR's "Mid-to-Long Term Railway Network Plan" (revised in 2008), this grid is composed of 8 high-speed rail corridors, four running north-south and four going east-west, and has a total of 12,000 km. Most of the new lines follow the routes of existing trunk lines and are designated for passenger travel only. They are known as passenger-designated lines (PDL). Several sections of the national grid, especially along the southeast coastal corridor, were built to link cities, which had no previous rail connections. Those sections will carry a mix of passenger and freight, but are sometimes mislabeled as PDLs. High-speed trains on PDLs can generally reach 300–350 km/h. On mixed-use HSR lines, passenger train service can attain peak speeds of 200–250 km/h. This ambitious national grid project was planned to be built by 2020, but the government's stimulus has expedited time-tables considerably for many of the lines.
The Jinqin Passenger Railway (Tianjin-Qinhuangdao) and Qinshen Passenger Railway (Qinhuangdao-Shenyang) are technically not part of the 8 main lines, but they serve to link the Beijing-Harbin PDL and Beijing-Shanghai PDL, and are included in this section.
Operational lines are marked with green background.
Line [corridor map] |
Route Description | Designed Speed (km/h) |
Length (km) |
Construction Start Date |
Open Date |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beijing–Harbin HSR (Jingha High-Speed Railway) |
main HSR corridor of Northeast China, consisting of the Beijing-Shenyang & Harbin-Dalian PDLs and the Panjin-Yinkou spur. | 350 | 1700 | 2007-08-23 | postponed | |
Beijing–Shenyang (Beijing–Shenyang High-Speed Railway) |
Beijing-Shenyang segment of Jingha PDL, via Chengde, Fuxin and Chaoyang | 350 | 684 | expected 2012 |
postponed | |
Harbin–Dalian (Harbin–Dalian High-Speed Railway) |
PDL from Harbin to Dalian via Shenyang & Changchun | 350 | 904 | 2007-08-23 | 2012-07-15[120] | |
Panjin–Yingkou (Panjin–Yingkou High-Speed Railway) |
Connects Yingkou to Qinhuangdao-Shenyang HSR at Panjin | 350 | 89 | 2009-05-31 | 2012 | |
Beijing–Shanghai HSR (Jinghu High-Speed Railway) |
Main north-south high speed railway of East China, connecting Beijing, Jinan, Tai'an, Xuzhou, Bengbu, Nanjing & Shanghai | 380 | 1302 | 2008-04-18 | 2011-06-30 [121] |
|
Hefei–Bengbu (Hefei–Bengbu High-Speed Railway) |
Extends Jinghu PDL from Bengbu to Hefei | 350 | 131 | 2008-01-08 | 2013 | |
Beijing–Guangzhou–Shenzhen–Hong Kong HSR (Jingguangshengang High-Speed Railway) |
Main north-south high speed rail corridor through North and Central China, consisting of four segments between Beijing, Shijiazhuang, Wuhan, Guangzhou, and Hong Kong. | 200- 350 |
2229 | 2005-09-01 | 2012 | |
Beijing–Shijiazhuang (Beijing–Shijiazhuang High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Beijing to Shijiazhuang | 350 | 281 | 2008-10-08 | 2012-10-01 | |
Shijiazhuang–Wuhan (Shijiazhuang–Wuhan High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Shijiazhuang to Wuhan via Zhengzhou | 350 | 838 | 2008-10-15 | 2012-08, 2012[122] |
|
Wuhan–Guangzhou (Wuhan–Guangzhou High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Wuhan to Guangzhou via Changsha | 350 | 968 | 2005-09-01 | 2009-12-26 | |
Mainland section Guangzhou–Shenzhen–Hong Kong (Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Intercity Railway) |
HSR from Guangzhou to Shenzhen | 350 | 116 | 2008-08-20 | 2011-12-26[123] | |
Hong Kong section Guangzhou–Shenzhen–Hong Kong (Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Intercity Railway) |
HSR from Shenzhen to Hong Kong | 200 | 26 | 2010 | 2016 | |
Hangzhou–Fuzhou–Shenzhen HSR (Hangfushen High-Speed Railway) |
HSR linking coastal cities from Shanghai to Hangzhou to Shenzhen, built in five segments, with plans for a rail bridge linking Shanghai and Ningbo across the Hangzhou Bay by 2020.[124] | 200- 350 |
1450 | 2005-08-01 | 2012 | |
Hangzhou–Ningbo (Hangzhou–Ningbo High-Speed Railway) |
High-speed PDL from Hangzhou to Ningbo | 350 | 152 | 2009-04 | 2012–06[125] | |
Ningbo–Taizhou–Wenzhou (Ningbo–Taizhou–Wenzhou Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR line along the coast of Zhejiang Province. | 250 | 268 | 2005-10-27 | 2009-09-28 | |
Wenzhou–Fuzhou (Wenzhou–Fuzhou Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR line from Wenzhou to Fuzhou. | 250 | 298 | 2005-01-08 | 2009-09-28 | |
Fuzhou–Xiamen (Fuzhou–Xiamen Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR line along the coast of Fujian Province from Fuzhou to Xiamen via Putian & Quanzhou. | 250 | 275 | 2005-10-01 | 2010-04-26 | |
Xiamen–Shenzhen (Xiamen–Shenzhen Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR line along the coast of Fujian and Guangdong via Zhangzhou, Shantou & Huizhou. | 250 | 502 | 2007-11-23 | late 2012 |
Operational lines are marked with green background.
Line [corridor map] |
Route Description | Designed Speed (km/h) |
Length (km) |
Construction Start Date |
Open Date |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qingdao–Taiyuan HSR (Qingtai High-Speed Railway) |
HSR across North China consisting of three segments connecting Taiyuan, Shijiazhuang, Jinan and Qingdao. | 250 | 873 | 2005-06-01 | 2015-12 | |
(Qingdao)Jiaozhou–Jinan (Qingdao–Jinan High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Qingdao and Jinan | 250 | 364 | 2007-01-28 | 2008-12-20 | |
Jinan–Shijiazhuang (Shijiazhuang–Jinan High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Shijiazhuang & Jinan via Dezhou | 250 | 319 | expected 2012-07 |
2015-12 | |
Shijiazhuang–Taiyuan (Shijiazhuang–Taiyuan High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Shijiazhuang & Taiyuan. | 250 | 190 | 2005-06-11 | 2009-04-01 | |
Xuzhou–Lanzhou HSR (Xulan High-Speed Railway) |
HSR across the Yellow River Valley of central China, consisting of four segments connecting Xuzhou, Zhengzhou, Xian, Baoji and Lanzhou. | 350 | 1363 | 2005-06-01 | 2017 | |
Xuzhou–Zhengzhou (Zhengzhou–Xuzhou High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Xuzhou & Zhengzhou | 350 | 357 | 2010 | 2013 | |
Zhengzhou–Xi'an (Zhengzhou–Xi'an High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Zhengzhou & Xian | 350 | 455 | 2005-09-01 | 2010-02-06 | |
Xi'an–Baoji (Xi'an–Baoji High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Xi'an & Baoji | 350 | 148 | 2009-11-22 | 2012 | |
Baoji–Lanzhou (Baoji–Lanzhou High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Baoji & Lanzhou | 350 | 403 | expected 2012-07 |
2017 | |
Shanghai–Wuhan–Chengdu HSR (Huhanrong High-Speed Railway) |
HSR corridor through the Yangtze Valley, consisting of the Shanghai-Nanjing section of the Beijing-Shanghai PDL, and 7 mixed-use HSR segments connecting Nanjing, Hefei, Wuhan, Yichang, Lichuan, Chongqing, Suining & Chengdu. | 200- 350 |
2078 | 2003-12-01 | 2012 | |
Shanghai–Nanjing (Shanghai–Nanjing Intercity Railway) |
High-speed railway connecting Shanghai and Nanjing | 350 | 301 | 2008-07-01 | 2010-07-01 | |
Nanjing–Hefei (Hefei–Nanjing High-Speed Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR connecting Nanjing & Hefei | 250 | 166 | 2005-06-11 | 2008-04-19 | |
Hefei–Wuhan (Hefei–Wuhan High-Speed Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR connecting Hefei & Wuhan | 250 | 351 | 2005-08-01 | 2009-04-01 | |
(Wuhan)Hankou–Yichang (Hankou–Yichang Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR connecting Wuhan & Yichang | 250 | 293 | 2008-09-17 | 2012-01-01 | |
Yichang–Lichuan section Yichang–Wanzhou (Yichang–Wanzhou Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR connecting Yichang & Lichuan[126] | 200 | 377 | 2003-12-01 | 2010-12-23 | |
Lichuan–Chongqing (Chongqing–Lichuan Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR connecting Lichuan & Chongqing | 200 | 264 | 2008-12-29 | 2012 | |
Chongqing–Suining (Suining–Chongqing Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR connecting Chongqing & Suining | 200 | 132 | 2009-01-18 | 2012–01 | |
Suining–Chengdu section Dazhou–Chengdu Dazhou–Chengdu Railway) |
Mixed passenger & freight HSR connecting Suining & Chengdu. | 200 | 148 | 2005-05 | 2009-06-30 | |
Shanghai–Kunming HSR (Hukun High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting East, Central and Southwest China. It consists of three sections connecting Shanghai, Hangzhou, Changsha and Kunming. | 350 | 2066 | 2008-12-28 | 2013-06-30[127] | |
Shanghai–Hangzhou (Shanghai–Hangzhou High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Shanghai Hongqiao & Hangzhou East. | 350 | 150 | 2009-02-26 | 2010-10-26 | |
Hangzhou–Changsha (Hangzhou–Changsha High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Hangzhou & Changsha. | 350 | 926 | 2009-12-22 | 2013-06-30 | |
Changsha–Kunming (Changsha–Kunming High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Changsha & Kunming | 350 | 1175 | 2010-03-26 | 2013-06-30 |
According to the "Mid-to-Long Term Railway Network Plan" (revised in 2008), the MOR plans to build over 40,000 km of railway in order to expand the railway network in western China and to fill gaps in the networks of eastern and central China. Some of these new railways are being built to accommodate speeds of 200~250 km/h for both passengers and freight. These are also considered high-speed rail though they are not part of the national PDL grid or Intercity High Speed Rail.
Operational lines are marked with green background.
Line [corridor map] |
Route Description | Designed Speed (km/h) |
Length (km) |
Construction Start Date |
Open Date |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beijing–Harbin HSR & Beijing–Shanghai HSR Link | Originally part of the Jingha PDL. An important linkage between Tianjin and Shenyang through Qinhuangdao. | 250 | 665 | 1999 | 2012 | |
Tianjin–Qinhuangdao (Tianjin–Qinhuangdao High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Tianjin & Qinhuangdao. | 350 | 261 | 2008 | 2012 | |
Qinhuangdao–Shenyang (Qinhuangdao–Shenyang High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Qinhuangdao & Shenyang. | 250 | 404 | 1999 | 2003-07-01 | |
Chengdu–Guangzhou HSR (Chengguang High-Speed Railway) | HSR from the Pearl River Delta to the Sichuan Basin via Guiyang & Guilin. | 300–350 | 1376 | 2008-10-13 | 2014 | |
Chengdu–Guiyang (Chengdu–Guiyang High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Chengdu & Guiyang via Leshan, Yibin & Bijie. | 350 | 519 | 2010 | 2014 | |
Guiyang–Guangzhou (Guiyang–Guangzhou High-Speed Railway) |
PDL connecting Guiyang & Guangzhou. | 300 | 857 | 2008-10-13 | 2014 | |
Lanzhou–(Xinjing)Ürümqi HSR (Lanxin High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Lanzhou to Ürümqi via Xining & Zhangye, Jiuquan, Jiayuguan, Hami & Turpan | 300 | 1776 | 2010 | 2014 | |
Hefei–Fuzhou HSR (Hefei–Fuzhou High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from the Hefei to Fuzhou via Huangshan, Shangrao & Wuyishan. | 250 | 806 | 2010-04-27 | 2014 | |
Datong–Xian HSR (Datong–Xian High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Datong to Xi'an via Taiyuan. | 250 | 859 | 2009-12-03 | 2013 | |
Xi'an–Chengdu HSR (Xi'an–Chengdu High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Xi'an to Chengdu via Hanzhong and Guangyuan. | 250 | 510 | 2010 | 2015 | |
Shangqiu–Hangzhou HSR (Shangqiu–Hangzhou High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Shangqiu to Hangzhou via Fuyang Hefei & Wuhu. | 350 | 770 | 2010? | – | |
(Kunming)Yunnan–(Nanning)Guangxi HSR (Yunnan–Guangxi High-speed railway) |
HSR from Nanning to Kunming via Bose. | 200–250 | 710 | 2010-12-27 | 2016[128] | |
Tianjin–Baoding HSR (Tianjin–Baoding High-speed railway) |
HSR from Tianjin to Baoding via Bazhou & Baiyangdian. | 250 | 158 | 2011-03-18 | 2013[129] | |
Nanjing–Hangzhou HSR (Ninghang High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Nanjing to Hangzhou via Liyang, Yixing and Huzhou. | 350 | 249 | 2008-12-27 | 2011-12-31[130] | |
Nanning–Qinzhou HSR (Nanning–Qinzhou High-Speed Railway) |
HSR from Nanning to Qinzhou. | 250 | 99 | 2011-11-06[131] |
Lines | Length (km) | Design Speed (km/h) | Construction Start Date | Open Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Longyan-Xiamen Railway | 171 | 200 | 2006-12-25 | 2012 | |
Xiangtang (Nanchang)-Putian (Fuzhou) Railway | 604 | 250 | 2007-11-23 | 2011 | |
Nanping-Sanming-Longyan Railway | 247 | 250 | 2010-12-25 | 2014 | [132] |
Guangzhou-Nanning Railway | 577 | 250 | 2008-09-11 | 2013 |
Intercity railways are designed to provide regional high-speed rail service between large cities and metropolitan areas that are generally within the same province. Intercity HSR service speeds range from 200 to 350 km/h.
Construction schedule Operational lines are marked with green background.
Line | Length (km) |
Design Speed (km/h) |
Construction Start Date YYYY-MM-DD |
Open Date YYYY-MM-DD |
---|---|---|---|---|
Beijing–Tianjin Intercity Railway | 115 | 350 | 2005-04-07 | 2008-08-01 |
Chengdu–Dujiangyan Intercity Railway | 65 | 220 | 2008-11-04 | 2010-05-12 |
Shanghai–Nanjing Intercity Railway | 301 | 350 | 2008-07-01 | 2010-07-01 |
Nanchang–Jiujiang Intercity Railway | 131 | 250 | 2007-06-28 | 2010-09-20 |
Hainan Eastern Ring Railway | 308 | 250 | 2007-09-29 | 2010-12-30 |
Changchun–Jilin Intercity Railway | 111 | 250 | 2007-05-13 | 2010-12-30[133] |
Guangzhou–Zhuhai Intercity Railway | 117 | 200 | 2005-12-18 | 2011-01-07 |
Nanjing–Anqing Intercity Railway | 257 | 250 | 2008-12-28 | 2012-06 |
Nanjing–Hangzhou Intercity Railway | 251 | 350 | 2008-12-28 | 2012-12-28 |
Jiangyou–Mianyang–Chengdu–Leshan Intercity Railway | 319 | 200 | 2008-12-30 | 2012-12-30 |
Wuhan Metropolitan Area Intercity Railway (Wuhan-Xiaogan, Huangshi, Xianning and Huanggang) |
160 | 200 | 2009-03-22 | 2011-10-01, 2013 |
Beijing–Tangshan Intercity Railway | 160 | 350 | 2009 | 2012 |
Tianjin–Baoding Intercity Railway | 145 | 250 | 2009 | 2012 |
Qingdao–Rongcheng Intercity Railway | 299 | 250 | 2009-11-30 | 2012-12 |
Harbin–Qiqihar Intercity Railway | 286 | 250 | 2008-11-25 | 2013-12 |
Beijing–Zhangjiakou Intercity Railway | 174 | 200 | 2009 | 2014[134] |
Chongqing–Wanzhou Intercity Railway | 250 | 350 | 2009 | 2013 |
Shenyang–Dandong Intercity Railway | 208 | 350 | 2009 | 2013-9 |
Chengdu–Chongqing Intercity Railway | 305 | 300 | 2009 | 2014 |
Changsha–Zhuzhou–Xiangtan Intercity Railway | 95.5 | 200 | 2010-07-02 | 2014-07-02 |
Hangzhou–Huangshan Intercity Railway | 262 | 250 | 2010-xx-xx | 2013-xx-xx |
China Railways, the MOR's national rail service operator, provides high speed train service called China Railway High-speed (CRH) (中国铁路高速) on upgraded conventional rail lines, national high speed railways and intercity high-speed lines. The CRH's high speed trains are also called "Harmony Express." In October 2010, CRH service more than 1,000 trains per day, with a daily ridership of about 925,000.[135] as of January, 2011, a total of 495 CRH trainsets were put in to use.
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ridership of CRH service | 61.21 | 127.73 | 179.58 | 290.54 |
As of September 2010, there are 2,876 km of upgraded conventional railways in China that can accommodate trains running speeds of 200 to 250 km/h.[136] Over time with the completion of the national high-speed passenger-dedicated rail network, more CRH service will shift from these lines to the high-speed dedicated lines.
A. Intercity service (typically, listed in schedules as C-series or D-series trains):
B. Long-haul service (typically, listed in schedules as G-series or D-series trains):
The table belows lists the upgraded conventional railways that run 10 or more CRH high speed trains per day.
Route | Railway | distance | Trains per day[137] (aggregation of both direction) |
Trains in service |
Guangzhou-Shenzhen | Guangshen line | 147 km[138] | 220 | CRH1A |
Ningbo-Hangzhou | Hangning line | 149 km[139] | 50 | CRH1A/B/E CRH2A/B/E |
Beijing-Shijiazhuang | Jingguang line | 277 km[140] | 46 | CRH2A CRH5A |
Beijing-Shenyang | Jingha line | 703 km[141] | 24 | CRH5A |
Beijing-Jinan | Jinghu line | 495 km[142] | 22 | CRH2A CRH5A |
Chongqing-Chengdu | Chengyu line & Dacheng line | 315 km[143] | 22 | CRH1A |
Beijing-Shanghai | Jinghu line | 1454 km[144] | 18 | CRH1E CRH2E |
Wuhan-Nanchang | Wujiu line & Changjiu PDL | 337 km[145] | 16 | CRH2A |
Shijiazhuang-Zhengzhou | Jingguang line | 412 km[146] | 14 | CRH2A |
The following table lists the frequency of CRH service on 14 HSR lines (as of February, 2011). In some cases, CRH trains must still share the HSR lines with slower, non-high speed trains, which are not listed in the table. Note China's first HSR, the Qinshen PDL service as part of the Jingha Railway.
Line (route) |
Length (main line) |
Travel time (By fastest train) |
Trains per day[137] (aggregation of both direction) |
Designed speed | Trains in service |
Jinghu HSR (Beijing-Shanghai) |
1318 km | 4h 48m[147] | 180 | 380 km/h Opening speed 310 km/h |
CRH380A/AL CRH380BL CRH2E CRH1E CRH5 |
Wuguang PDL (Wuhan-Changsha-Guangzhou) |
968 km | 3h 33m[148] | 216 | 350 km/h | CRH2C CRH3C[149] CRH380A/AL |
Huhang PDL (Shanghai-Hangzhou) |
169 km (Shanghai Hongqiao – Hangzhou) | 45min[150] | 168[151] | 350 km/h | CRH1A/B/E CRH2A/B/C/E CRH3C CRH380A/AL CRH380BL[152] |
Huning PDL (Shanghai-Nanjing) |
296 km (Shanghai Hongqiao – Nanjing) | 1h 13min[153] | 238[151] | 350 km/h | CRH1A/B CRH2A/B/C CRH3C CRH380A/AL CRH380BL[154][155] |
Jingjin ICL (Beijing-Tianjin) |
117 km | 30min[156] | 200[157] | 350 km/h | CRH3C[158] |
Zhengxi PDL (Zhengzhou-Xi'an) |
456 km | 1h 50min[159] | 28 | 350 km/h | CRH2C[160] |
Yongtaiwen PFL (Ningbo-Taizhou-Wenzhou) |
268 km | 1h 13min[161] | 64 | 250 km/h | CRH1B/E CRH2A/B/E[162] |
Wenfu PFL (Wenzhou-Fuzhou) |
298 km | 1h 23min[163] | 42 | 250 km/h | CRH1A/B/E CRH2A/B/E[164] |
Shitai PDL (Shijiazhuang-Taiyuan) |
190 km (Shijiazhuang North–Taiyuan) | 1h 6min[165] | 26 | 250 km/h | CRH5A[166] |
Fuxia PFL (Fuzhou-Xiamen) |
275 km | 1h 21min[167] | 118 | 250 km/h | CRH1A/B/E CRH2A/E[164] |
Changjiu ICL (Nanchang-Jiujiang) |
135 km | 45min[168] | 42 | 250 km/h | CRH1A CRH2A[169] |
Hewu PFL (Hefei-Wuhan) |
351 km | 1h 58min[170] | 38 | 250 km/h | CRH1A/B CRH2A/B[171] |
Jiaoji PDL (Qingdao-Jinan) |
362 km | 2h 13min[172] | 42 | 250 km/h | CRH2A CRH5A[173] |
Hening PFL (Hefei-Nanjing) |
156 km | 54min[174] | 12 | 250 km/h | CRH1A/B CRH2A/B[171] |
Chengguan PDL (Chengdu-Guanxian) |
67 km | 30min[175] | 36 | 250 km/h | CRH1A[176] |
Changji ICL (Changchun-Jilin) |
111 km | 34min[177] | 50 | 250 km/h | CRH5A |
Hainan ER ICL (Haikou-Sanya) |
308 km | 1h 22min[178] | 44 | 250 km/h | CRH1A |
Guangzhu MRT (Guangzhou-Zhuhai main line) |
93 km | 45min[179] | 76 | 200 km/h | CRH1A |
Guangzhu MRT (Guangzhou-Xinhui branch line) |
72 km | 45min[180] | 46 | 200 km/h | CRH1A |
China Railway High-speed runs different electric multiple unit (trainsets), the designs of which all are imported from other nations and given the designations CRH-1 through CRH-5. CRH trainsets are intended to provide fast and convenient travel between cities. Some of the trainsets are manufactured locally through technology transfer, a key requirement for China. The signalling, track and support structures, control software and station design are developed domestically with foreign elements as well, so the system as a whole could be called Chinese. China currently holds many new patents related to the internal components of these train sets since they have re-designed major components so the trains can run at a much higher speed than the original foreign train design.
CRH1A, B,E, CRH2A, B,E, and CRH5A are designed for a maximum operating speed (MOR) of 200 km/h and can reach up to 250 km/h. CRH3C and CRH2C designs have an MOR of 300 km/h, and can reach up to 350 km/h, with a top testing speed more than 380 km/h. However, in practical terms, issues such as cost of maintenance, comfort, cost and safety make the maximum design speed of more than 380 km/h impractical and remain limiting factors.
Equipment type | Top speed in test | Designed speed | Seating capacity | Formation | Power (under 25 kV) |
Enter Service |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRH1A | 278 km/h (173 mph) | 250 | 668 or 611 or 645 | 5M3T | 5,300 kW | 2007 |
CRH1B | 292 km/h (181 mph) | 250 | 1299 | 10M6T | 11,000 kW | 2009 |
CRH1E | 250 | 618 or 642 | 10M6T | 11,000 kW | 2009 | |
CRH2A | 282 km/h (175 mph) | 250 | 610 or 588 | 4M4T | 4,800 kW | 2007 |
CRH2B | 275 km/h (171 mph) | 250 | 1230 | 8M8T | 9,600 kW | 2008 |
CRH2C Stage 1 | 394.2 km/h (244.9 mph) | 300 | 610 | 6M2T | 7,200 kW | 2008 |
CRH2C Stage 2 | 350 | 610 | 6M2T | 8,760 kW | 2010 | |
CRH2E | 250 | 630 | 8M8T | 9,600 kW | 2008 | |
CRH3C | 394.3 km/h (245.0 mph) | 350 | 600 or 556 | 4M4T | 8,800 kW | 2008 |
CRH5A | 250 | 622 or 586 or 570 | 5M3T | 5,500 kW | 2007 | |
CRH380A | 416.6 km/h (258.9 mph) | 380 | 494 | 6M2T | 9,600 kW | 2010 |
CRH380AL | 486.1 km/h (302.0 mph) | 380 | 1027 | 14M2T | 20,440 kW | 2010 |
CRH380B | 380 | unknown | 4M4T | 9,200 kW | 2011 (plan) | |
CRH380BL | 487.3 km/h (302.8 mph) | 380 | 1004 | 8M8T | 18,400 kW | 2010 |
CRH380CL | 380 | 8M8T | 19,200 kW | 2012 (plan) | ||
CRH380D | 380 | 495 | 4M4T | 10,000 kW | 2012 (plan) | |
CRH380DL | 380 | 1013 | 8M8T | 20,000 kW | Canceled (2012 original plan) | |
CRH6 | 220 | 586 | 4M4T | unknown | 2011 (plan) |
Date | Factory | Speed Level | Type | Quantity (set) |
Quantity (car) |
Amount |
Oct 10, 2004[183] | Alstom | 250 km/h | CRH5A | 3 | 24 | 620 million EUR |
CNR Changchun | 57 | 456 | ||||
Oct 12, 2004[184] | BST (Bombardier & CSR) | 250 km/h | CRH1A | 20 | 160 | 350 million USD |
Oct 20, 2004[185] | Kawasaki | 250 km/h | CRH2A | 3 | 24 | 9,300 million RMB |
CSR Sifang | 57 | 456 | ||||
May 30, 2005[186] | BST | 250 km/h | CRH1A | 20 | 160 | 350 million USD |
June 2005[185] | CSR Sifang | 300 km/h | CRH2C Stage one | 30 | 240 | 8,200 million RMB |
350 km/h | CRH2C Stage two | 30 | 240 | |||
Nov 20, 2005[187] | Siemens | 350 km/h | CRH3C | 3 | 24 | 13,000 million RMB |
CNR Tangshan | 57 | 456 | ||||
Oct 31, 2007[188] | BST | 250 km/h | CRH1B | 20 | 320 | 1,000 million EUR |
CRH1E | 20 | 320 | ||||
Nov 2007[189] | CSR Sifang | 250 km/h | CRH2B | 10 | 160 | 1,200 million RMB |
Nov 2007[185] | CSR Sifang | 250 km/h | CRH2E | 6 | 96 | 900 million RMB |
Dec 6, 2008[185] | CSR Sifang | 250 km/h | CRH2E | 14 | 224 | 2,100 million RMB |
Sep 23, 2009[190] | CNR Changchun | 250 km/h | CRH5A | 30 | 240 | 4,800 million RMB |
Mar 16, 2009[191] | CNR Tangshan | 380 km/h | CRH380BL | 70 | 1,120 | 39,200 million RMB |
CNR Changchun | 30 | 480 | ||||
Sep 28, 2009[192] | CSR Sifang | 380 km/h | CRH380A | 40 | 320 | 45,000 million RMB |
CRH380AL | 100 | 1,600 | ||||
Sep 28, 2009[192] | BST | 380 km/h | CRH380D | 20 | 160 | 27,400 million RMB |
CRH380DL | 60 | 960 | ||||
Sep 28, 2009[193] | CNR Changchun | 380 km/h | CRH380B | 40 | 320 | 23,520 million RMB |
CRH380BL | 15 | 240 | ||||
CRH380CL | 25 | 400 | ||||
Sep 28, 2009[194] | CNR Tangshan | 350 km/h | CRH3C[195] | 20 | 160 | 3,920 million RMB |
Dec 30, 2009[196] | CSR Puzhen | 220 km/h | CRH6 | 24 | 192 | 2,346 million RMB |
July 16, 2010[197] | BST | 250 km/h | CRH1A | 40 | 320 | 5,200 million RMB |
Sep 14, 2010[198] | CSR Sifang | 250 km/h | CRH2A | 40 | 320 | 3,400 million RMB |
Oct 13, 2010[199] | CNR Changchun | 250 km/h | CRH5A | 20 | 160 | 2,700 million RMB |
Apr 26, 2011 | CNR Changchun | 250 km/h | CRH5A | 30 | 240 | 3,870 million RMB |
Total | 954 | 10,352 |
Based on data published by Sinolink Securities,[200][201] some small changes were made according to the most recent news.
Type | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
Future (plan) |
Total |
CRH1A | 8 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 20 | 20 | 80 | |
CRH2A | 19 | 41 | 15 | 25 | 100 | |||
CRH5A | 27 | 29 | 4 | 30 | 20 | 30 | 140 | |
CRH1B | 4 | 9 | 7 | 20 | ||||
CRH1E | 3 | 8 | 9 | 20 | ||||
CRH2B | 10 | 10 | ||||||
CRH2E | 6 | 14 | 20 | |||||
CRH2C | 10 | 20 | 30 | 60 | ||||
CRH3C | 7 | 36 | 37 | 80 | ||||
CRH380A | 40 | 40 | ||||||
CRH380AL | 6 | 94 | 100 | |||||
CRH380B | 20 | 201 | 40 | |||||
CRH380BL | 11 | 49 | 551 | 115 | ||||
CRH380CL | 251 | 25 | ||||||
CRH380D | 702 | 70 | ||||||
CRH380DL | 02 | 0 | ||||||
CRH6 | 24 | 24 | ||||||
Total | 27 | 86 | 78 | 88 | 204 | 237 | 224 | 944 |
Cumulative | 27 | 113 | 191 | 279 | 483 | 744 | 944 | 944 |
Many of the Passenger Designated Lines use ballastless tracks, which allow for smoother train rides at high speeds and can withstand heavy use without warping. The ballastless track technology, imported from Germany, carries higher upfront costs but can reduce maintenance costs.[202][203]
Typical application of track technology in China high speed lines
Type | Classify | Technology | line |
CRTSIs | slab track | RTRI, Japan | Hada PDL |
CRTSIIs | slab track | Max Bögl, Germany | Jingjin ICL |
CRTSIIIs | slab track | CRCC,China | Chengguan PDL |
CRTSIb | ballastless track | Rail.one, Germany | Wuguang PDL |
CRTSIIb | ballastless track | Züblin, Germany | Zhengxi PDL |
Chinese train-makers and rail builders have signed agreements to build HSRs in Turkey, Venezuela and Argentina[204] and are bidding on HSR projects in the United States, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Brazil (São Paulo to Rio de Janeiro) and Myanmar, and other countries.[85] They are competing directly with the established European and Japanese manufacturers, and sometimes partnering with them. In Saudi Arabia's Haramain High Speed Rail Project, Alstom partnered with China Railway Construction Corp. to win the contract to build phase I of the Mecca to Medina HSR line, and Siemens has joined CSR to bid on phase II.[205] China is also competing with Japan, Germany, South Korea, Spain, France and Italy to bid for California's high-speed rail line project, which would connect San Francisco and Los Angeles.[206] In November 2009, the MOR signed preliminary agreements with the state's high speed rail authority and General Electric (GE) under which China would license technology, provide financing and furnish up to 20 percent of the parts with the remaining sourced from American suppliers, and final assembly of the rolling stock in the United States.[207]
China has the world's only maglev high-speed train line in operation: The Shanghai Maglev Train, a turnkey Transrapid maglev demonstration line 30.5 km long. The trains have a top operational speed of 430 km/h and can reach a top non-commercial speed of 501 km/h. It has shuttled passengers between Shanghai's Longyang Road Metro Station and Shanghai Pudong International Airport since March, 2004. Service was briefly interrupted by an electrical fire in 2006. Shanghai authorities have been trying without success to extend the 30.5 km maglev line. An intercity link with Hangzhou was approved by the central government in 2006, but construction has been postponed.[208] Work on a shorter extension to Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport is also stalled.
The "fastest" train commercial service can be defined alternatively by a train's top speed or average trip speed.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: China Railway High-speed |
|
|
|