iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Louis Klarevas

GET UPDATES FROM Louis Klarevas
 

Romney's Unrealistic Foreign Policy Vision: National Security Funded by Money Growing Trees

Posted: 10/10/2012 2:41 pm

In what Republicans are heralding as an attempt to chart a new course for America in international affairs, Mitt Romney on Monday outlined the key elements of what will become his foreign policy if elected president. At the heart of Romney's speech at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) is a call for a more assertive national security policy, centered around the principle of American exceptionalism:

This is what makes America exceptional: It is not just the character of our country - it is the record of our accomplishments. America has a proud history of strong, confident, principled global leadership - a history that has been written by patriots of both parties. That is America at its best. And it is the standard by which we measure every President, as well as anyone who wishes to be President. Unfortunately, this President's policies have not been equal to our best examples of world leadership.

Romney was immediately criticized for making a largely rhetorical speech, absent details and substance.

But one thing is clear from Romney's foray into foreign affairs. His national security policy is intimately tied to a yet unannounced environmental policy: the promotion of an international campaign to plant money growing trees.

Romney's definitely going green - although not the type of green the Sierra Club and National Wildlife Federation have in mind.

As his speech at VMI made clear, his foreign policy is predicated on a robust defense:

The decisions we make today will determine our ability to protect America tomorrow. The first purpose of a strong military is to prevent war. The size of our Navy is at levels not seen since 1916. I will restore our Navy to the size needed to fulfill our missions by building 15 ships per year, including three submarines. I will implement effective missile defenses to protect against threats. And on this, there will be no flexibility with Vladimir Putin. And I will call on our NATO allies to keep the greatest military alliance in history strong by honoring their commitment to each devote 2 percent of their GDP to security spending. Today, only 3 of the 28 NATO nations meet this benchmark.

At a time when the federal deficit is near record numbers and the debt ceiling has been pushed to a new all-time high of over $16 trillion, can the United States really afford to build 15 naval ships per year? For that matter, will adding three submarines per year really impact the four main foreign policy problems he highlighted in his speech: Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, and Syria?

Of course, magic trees that sprout dollar-bills will certainly make a big difference. But given Romney's designs, it won't be enough for Americans to do the planting. Our allies need to start digging too. Otherwise, how are economically plagued countries like Spain, Portugal, and Greece - or for that matter any NATO ally other than the United Kingdom - going to satisfy Romney's two percent demand in the coming years?

Romney concluded his speech by decrying:

We must show them that we still have faith in ourselves--that we have the will and the wisdom to revive our stagnant economy, to roll back our unsustainable debt, to reform our government, to reverse the catastrophic cuts now threatening our national defense, to renew the sources of our great power, and to lead the course of human events.

I can think of few better examples of American exceptionalism than the ability to produce genetically-modified flora that will give us the wealth we need to pay for Romney's world order.

If we are to take Romney's cue and follow his lead, we better all get our shovels out.

 

Follow Louis Klarevas on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Klarevas

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
58 minutes ago ( 6:10 PM)
Also confirmed by Paul Ryan in the VP debate. He will cut social programs but will increase spending on the military.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mrsyd
03:28 PM on 10/11/2012
Unrealistic?? Today we hear another diplomatic security officer was assassinated in Yemen. Will Obama hide this one under the rug and call it another "BUMP IN THE ROAD" or will he say the dreaded word "terrorism"?? Diplomacy is important, but when self preservation is involved, bowing and scraping to your enemy must come to an end. Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration have projected weakness without projecting strength at the same time. These two components are necessary if we truly want to have peace. that is were the time tested adage "Walk softly and carry a big stick", comes in. What happens when you project weakness? American deaths, 27 countries aflame including all of the Middle East, much of Africa, London, Sydney, Paris, Antwerp. Diplomats died, they have hung Obama in effigy, chanted "Obama we are Osama", burned the American flag, etc. Clinton and Obama need to go back to diplomacy school. This is a prime example of inexperience. And to think, we were focused on the abysmal economy and got snowed on foreign affairs!! We are seeing ineptness on every front. Romney/Ryan 2012
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian56
05:48 AM on 10/11/2012
That is EXACTLY what Romney's FP is.

Growing money on trees.

$1.675tn p.a. on military spending whilst running $1.5tn deficits

Search "ian56 the REALITY of Mitt Romney's tax plans & policies"
crazyalice
still traveling hopefully
05:57 PM on 10/10/2012
it's amusing how thrifty mitt plans to be in regard to the deficit yet how subservient he IS to the neocons and running up the defense budget. you can't be fiscally responsible and do both. we need to quit sending our kids to war and start sending our citizens to work, mitt. it's the economy, stupid !
06:40 PM on 10/10/2012
Actually we have more than enough money to continue our global leadership role so long as we make the appropriate cuts in domestic spending. No one likes war but sometimes it's neccesary, like in Syria right now where we should be putting an end to slaughter and removing Assad. The best way to send our citizens to work is to get government out of the way.
01:16 AM on 10/11/2012
What is this "we" you are talking about?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gynn
09:29 AM on 10/11/2012
So you want Government to get out of the way and send our boys to war?

You probably want government to keep their hands off your social security and Medicare too?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Lahanas
Republicans: Robin Hood in Reverse
05:36 PM on 10/10/2012
Bush the Third
04:40 PM on 10/10/2012
UNINSTALLING OBAMA..... ███████████████▒▒▒ 90% complete
04:29 PM on 10/10/2012
Hey Lou, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012