- Order:
- Duration: 3:30
- Published: 28 Jan 2011
- Uploaded: 30 Aug 2011
- Author: LennyHMusic
It is possible to learn classical vocal methods like bel canto and to also be able to belt; in fact, many musical roles now require it. The belt sound is easier for some than others, but the sound is possible for classical singers, too. It requires muscle coordinations not readily used in classically trained singers, which may be why some opera singers find learning to belt challenging.
In order to increase the number of high notes one can belt, one must practice. This can be by repeatedly attempting to hit the note in a melody line, or by using vocalise programs utilizing scales. Many commercial learn-to-sing packages have a set of scales to sing along to as their main offering, which the purchaser must practice with often to see improvement.
'Belters' are not exempt from developing a strong head voice, as the more resonant their higher register in head voice, the better the belted notes in this range will be. Some belters find that after a period of time focusing on the belt, the head voice will have improved and, likewise, after a period of time focusing on the head voice, the belt may be found to have improved.
There are several controversies involving the definition of belting. The biggest question becomes when is chest voice a belt, and when does the height of the note differentiate between simply high chest voice and a belt. On average, an R&B; or pop singer's belting range is recognized as the C above middle C (C5) that extends to the upper parts of that octave (i.e. Kelly Clarkson's belting voice extends from C5-A5, a huge range in this area). The question becomes when does it start. In the song I Will Always Love You by Whitney Houston. she continuously belts a B4, which is a semitone lower than C5. There is no definite reason why this is not considered a belt, whereas one semitone higher IS. There is very little difference between the use of the vocal cords, and it is still an extremely high note in chest voice. This is a heated debate amongst several musicians and analysts.
Most tutors and some students of the method known as Speech Level Singing, created and supported by Seth Riggs, regard belting as damaging to long term vocal health. They may teach an alternative using a "mixed" or middle voice which can sound almost as strong as chest voice. The subject of belting is a matter of heated controversy among singers, singing teachers and methodologies.
Proponents of belting say that it is a "soft yell," and if produced properly it can be healthy. It does not require straining and they say it is not damaging to the voice. Though the larynx is higher than in classical technique,and many experts on the singing voice believe that a high larynx position is both dangerous to vocal health and produces what many find to be an unpleasant sound. According to master teacher David Jones, "Some of the dangers are general swelling of the vocal cords, pre-polyp swelling, ballooning of capillaries on the surface of the vocal cords, or vocal nodules. A high-larynxed approach to the high voice taught by a speech level singing instructor who does not listen appropriately can lead to one or ALL of these vocal disorders".
However, it is thought by some that belting will produce vocal nodules. This may be true if belting is produced incorrectly. If the sound produced is a mixed head and chest sound that safely approximates a belt, produced well, there may be no damage to the vocal folds.
As for the physiological and acoustical features of the metallic voices, a master's thesis has drawn the following conclusions:
This text is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA License. This text was originally published on Wikipedia and was developed by the Wikipedia community.