Archive for October, 2011

No Real Republic?

Michael D. Higgins

Michael D Higgins. In his final speech to the Dail argues that a real Republic has yet to be created in Ireland. Now he's the President of that Republic. Image via Wikipedia

As someone on the Libertarian wing of Conservatism I would take issue with much of Michael D Higgins’ sweeping assertions about the evils of individualism in this speech (see below).  But as Higgins is the new President-elect of Ireland, I thought readers may be interested in gaining an insight of the man’s world views – and perspectives on Irish nationalism and Republicanism.

The speech is a veritable tour de force – his final to the Dail.  He appears to have a few notes, but refers to them little.  But it’s a remarkable speech in that it is made to an almost empty chamber which, in a strange way, adds weight to the points he makes about the failure of the Republic and the failure of the political class in Ireland to create one.

Indeed, Higgins refers to three failures in Irish democracy: failure in terms of participative government, failure in terms of adminstrative inclusion and abject failure in terms of communications between and across all strata of society.  And while he falters a little at the start of his speech, he soon gets into his stride.  If you thought Michael D Higgins was a gentle old poet, if you listen to this speech you’ll get a good idea about the extent of his socialist radicalism.

However, I forgive him for this partly because his passion is deep-rooted in his background and his genuine concern for social inclusion.  The central premise of his speech is that while Egalitarianism and Nationalism were at the core of radical Republicanism in 1916, Nationalism became predominant – squeezing out any real Socialist notions that the emerging Free State had.

He also discusses the anti-Intellectual basis of the state – a point that resonates here in Northern Ireland.  Even Sinn Fein, that used to claim to have some type of Marxist agenda, now plots, schemes and and strategises in its lust for power over any real ideological basis to its ambitions.

 

Strategic and Mindful of Grief

The Martin McGuinness Bus

The bus to nowhere. Image by infomatique via Flickr

The most important learning that the Sinn Fein leadership has taken from the pitifully low polling for Martin McGuiness in the Irish presidential elections is (according to Gerry Adams in an interview for RTE today) that they need to be “strategic” and “mindful” of the grief of families of victims of IRA thuggery.

So there you have it.  The IRA caused the grief.  Adams and McGuinness were IRA leaders.  Now they have to be strategic and mindful of the grief they caused in order to get more votes.

I believe that encapsulates why the winner of the Irish presidential campaign, Michael D Higgins, polled three times more first preference votes than McGuinness. A veritable thrashing.  Well done Mr Higgins.

 

The Incredible Shrinking Northern Ireland Electorate

Polling station sign, London. UK general elect...

Image via Wikipedia

The following article was published in today’s Belfast Telegraph print edition…

In the 2010 General Election just over half of our electorate here in Northern Ireland (57.6%) bothered to vote.  This was the lowest turnout for all of the UK regions and the lowest turnout for a Westminster election since the records for such things began back in 1945.  One could argue that part of the reason for this low turnout was the restoration of devolution.  Voters here, some might argue, are less likely to vote in Westminster elections because the Assembly is responsible for more “bread and butter” issues – to lapse into the jargon of the typical MLA.  However, that’s not the case either…because in the Assembly elections turnout was even worse.  Turnout, in some constituencies, fell to well under 50% – in constituencies such as North Down and East Antrim.

Since the elections nothing has been done to address this problem.  Our politicians are behaving like nothing is wrong – that we still have a proper political discourse and that party politics can go as before.  But they can’t.  In fact there is a vast yawning gulf between party politics and the body politic.

Northern Ireland’s system of participative democracy has been pulled asunder because of a series of perfect storm forces that have been acting upon it.  One force is the underlying desire for a proper secular basis to our politics – outside the seriously tedious debates about “culture” or “identity”.  Another force is the disgust at the grubby grabathon that modern politics has become – with apparatchik political advisors, dodgy deals and shady goings-on.  But the most profound force, resulting in the disengagement of the electorate, is the sheer creepiness of the political class – one that seems incapable of understanding how bizarre local party politics seems to most of us.

The remoteness of the political class becomes more obvious when one looks at how each of the parties behaves.  The DUP chose to entirely ignore the fact that the public perception of it – and its leading dramatis personae – careered to rock bottom because of the patronising tone it adopted in the midst of the various Robinson debacles.  Rather than learning any lessons from the general election result – that saw its party leader lose his Westminster seat to Alliance – the party merely re-grouped and re-secured its East Belfast seat at the Assembly elections (although turnout in Belfast East slumped from 60% in 2007 to 53.6% in 2011).  In short – the DUP appears to have no interest in re-securing the disengaged and disenfranchised.  It merely wants to maximise its vote in the runt of the electorate that bothers to turn out.

Similarly Sinn Fein has chosen to ignore the public disgust at the appointment of Mary McCardle as a special advisor to the “Culture” Minister.  The UUP has chosen to ignore the fact that its public perception – since its appointment of Tom Elliott as Leader – is that it has no real relevance (if it ever had) to any voters East of the Bann.  The SDLP, witters on constantly about regional politics, Ireland this and that, a pan-Irish discourse etc., thereby totally losing us all in its esoteric, navel-gazing rants.

The result of all of this is the incredible, shrinking, Northern Ireland electorate.

In short, it appears that the political system that created vast turnouts in the past is no longer fit for purpose for a present, and future, that requires a different type of politics.  Big turnouts of the past were the stuff of sectarian headcounts.  Indeed, even in the most recent assembly elections the largest turnouts were in rural constituencies where the tribal drums could be beaten the loudest.  Fermanagh & South Tyrone had a turnout of around 69% versus around 46% in leafy, middle class North Down.

Northern Ireland, it would appear, needs a version of the Arab Spring to clear out what has come before.  The entire basis of our party politics is completely wrong for a series of political debates that affects us all.  Like hapless Apprentice contestants, the local political parties set out their stalls in the wrong locations with the wrong merchandise – and hardly anyone bothers to turn up or buy.

A spectrum of lying

Martin McGuinness giving press statement outsi...

Image via Wikipedia

I was at a splendid dinner party on Saturday night.  Two of the guests were from Tipperary.  Shortly after downing a rather splendid Black Muscat the conversation turned to the Irish Presidential election.  I asked the South-of-the-Border dinner guests who they might be voting for.  The response was a tad surprising.  “The last thing we need, at this time, is a new President…the country doesn’t need a President.  It’s all a waste of money.”

Quite.  But, then again, that’s what countries do…waste money on “heads of state”.

But the point they made was that this all seems like a particular waste of money at this particular time in Ireland’s history.

Ireland, before Greece, Portugal and Italy, was a financial laughing stock.  The light was shined on an economy that was, during the Tiger years, as Michael Lewis put it in the New Yorker, feeding upon itself.  Ridiculous property greed, bizarre business ventures, ostentatious consumption.  In short, the Irish rich made ridiculous fools of themselves.

And now they are electing a new President to preside (that is the word to be used in this context) over the shadow of its former self.

The one redeeming aspect of all of this is that the Northern candidates – “Dana” and former IRA leader Martin McGuiness – are hardly shining.  Dana has been shaken by some media tittle tattle about her personal life (the BBC has refused to tell us what it is, but I’m not that interested).  McGuiness has been shaken by the fact that the media, and general populace in the South, don’t seem to adhere to the norms of new-Northern political correctness.  In short they don’t abide to the political rule that the Shinners’ past shouldn’t be rattled in front of them at every opportunity.

Dana and McGuinness, ironically, are suffering from similar problems.  Dana is dogged by her blind adherence to a Catholic faith that one of the most Catholic countries in the world seems to be losing (along with its wealth).  McGuinness is plagued by the fact that his IRA denials and public sympathy for IRA murder victims ring hollow – following years of obfuscation about his involvement.

Ireland may be a shadow of its former self in the post credit-crunch world.  But it can hold its head up high for spotting bullshit when it sees it.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 39 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers