Sony SLT camera
![]() |
This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. (February 2012) |
![]() |
This article may contain original research. (February 2012) |
Single-Lens Translucent (SLT) is a Sony brand name for cameras which are positioned in between digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras and mirrorless interchangeable-lens cameras (MILC).[citation needed] While Sony SLTs' aspect recalls DSLRs in gross form and they use the same lenses (having the same flange-back distance), they are fundamentally different and - functionally - Sony SLTs are possibly[neutrality is disputed] closer to MILCs rather than to DSLRs, because Sony SLTs have an electronic view-finder whereas the fundamental characteristic of DSLRs is a view-finder which allows the user to directly view the optical image generated by the lens.
Sony SLT cameras have a mirror, but - unlike the one in DSLRs - it does not move, and it is semi-transparent, allowing the majority of the light to pass through to the sensor whilst reflecting a portion of it onto a phase-detection autofocus sensor, this way allowing full time phase detection auto focus.[1]
Like MILCs, Sony SLT cameras have an electronic viewfinder, using the image collected by their sensor. MILCs, though, focus by contrast detection, i.e. the same technology used by compact cameras[citation needed] (and by DSLRs when operating in live view mode and/or to record movies). See Autofocus. Sony SLT cameras - instead - are able to use phase-detection autofocus all the time, including during video recording, which - in general - is faster and more reliable than contrast detection autofocus. Therefore - at focusing - SLT cameras have an advantage[citation needed] both towards MILCs and towards DSLRs.
Fixed semi-transparent mirrors have been used in single-lens reflex cameras from at least the 1960s (see Canon Pellix). Olympus was the first - in the year 2000 and with its Olympus E-10 model - to introduce a similar concept to digital photography. Olympus E10 worked by splitting the light coming in from its lens into two beams: one for feeding the sensor, the other one for feeding in continuum an optical viewfinder, thus doing without a flipping mirror.[2]
The "SLT" brand name has been introduced by Sony with the launch of its Alpha 55 model. Its mirror can be raised for sensor cleaning.
Contents |
[edit] SLT compared to other digital cameras
[edit] SLT
Advantages:
- Continuous phase-detection autofocus even during video, live view or continuous shooting mode
- Lack of camera shake due to lack of mirror movement
- Shorter shutter lag due to lack of mirror movement
- Larger viewfinder image (compared to APS-C DSLRs, but not compared to full-frame DSLRs)
- Depth-of-field, exposure value, white balance and other settings can potentially be verified on the electronic viewfinder (and thus tweaked) before taking a picture.[citation needed]
Disadvantages:
- Less light reaching sensor, due to a portion of the light being reflected to phase-detection autofocus array (approximately 1/2 EV or ca. 30% in visible spectrum 400-700nm).
- Slight image quality reduction (compared to no mirror), and possibility of ghosting
- Low dynamic range of view-finder image (compared to optical viewfinder)
- Low resolution of view-finder image (compared to full-frame DSLR optical viewfinder)
- Bad color reproduction of view-finder image (compared to optical viewfinder)
- Refresh rate limited by the time it takes the sensor to form an image; in low light this causes severe stuttering of the viewfinder image when panning (e.g. if it takes 1/4 sec for the sensor to gather enough light to form an image then the EVF updates at 4 frames/second).
- No real-time image in viewfinder due to the time necessary for image processing; there's a short but recognizable and sometimes disturbing delay between the real world action and the continously displayed viewfinder image
- No continous viewfinder update at high shooting rates, the viewfinder shows the last picture taken instead of where the camera is actually pointed; mostly a concern with fast-moving subjects. (Note: Some DSLR's do not update the image at all, as mirror is up when shooting. However, some will give you a glimpse of what is being shot as the mirror and shutter reset for the next shot.)[citation needed]
- Delicate foil construction with unknown durability and long-term spare parts supply
- High power consumption for electronic viewfinder
[edit] Pellicle mirror SLT
Advantages
- More resistant mirror[citation needed]
- Bright viewfinder
- More compact body[citation needed]
Disadvantages:
- Lack of optical viewfinder
[edit] Mirrorless interchangeable lens camera
Compared to mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, SLT's major advantages are:
- Much shorter delay between touching the trigger and shot taken[citation needed]
- Faster autofocus (phase-detection vs contrast-detect)
- Continuous phase-detection autofocus even during exposure[citation needed]
- Phase-detection autofocus in live view, including during video recording.
SLT's disadvantages compared to mirrorless interchangeable lens camera are:
- Increased camera size / weight.[citation needed]
- Higher cost.[citation needed]
- Less light reaching sensor, due to portion of the light being reflected to phase-detection autofocus array (approximately 1/2 EV in current designs).
[edit] List of SLT cameras
- Sony Alpha 33
- Sony Alpha 35
- Sony Alpha 37
- Sony Alpha 55
- Sony Alpha 57
- Sony Alpha 65
- Sony Alpha 77
- Sony Alpha 99
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ "Camera speed redefined: Sony introduces first Translucent Mirror Technology digital cameras Light, compact α55 and α33: up to 10fps shooting with high-speed AF tracking and Full HD movie" (Press release). Sony. 2010-08-24. http://presscentre.sony.eu/content/detail.aspx?ReleaseID=6108&NewsAreaId=2. Retrieved 2010-08-28.
- ^ Phil Askey (January 2001). "Olympus E-10 Review". dpreview. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse10/.