4:40
How to use Wikipedia to Cite Sources
The Binary Boys are talking again...
published: 19 Feb 2009
Author: RockyMtnCollegian
How to use Wikipedia to Cite Sources
The Binary Boys are talking again
1:31
Find sources and citations from Wikipedia articles easily
The Full Wiki gives you sentences similar to those in Wikipedia articles that you can cite...
published: 24 Feb 2011
Author: thefullwiki
Find sources and citations from Wikipedia articles easily
The Full Wiki gives you sentences similar to those in Wikipedia articles that you can cite in your essays.
3:37
How to Create a Wikipedia Article
Watch more How to Use Internet Search & Web Browsers videos: www.howcast.com Subscribe...
published: 15 Mar 2010
Author: Howcast
How to Create a Wikipedia Article
Watch more How to Use Internet Search & Web Browsers videos: www.howcast.com Subscribe to Howcast's YouTube Channel - howc.st Create a Wikipedia article so you can share your knowledge with the world. Howcast uploads the highest quality how-to videos daily! Be sure to check out our playlists for guides that interest you: howc.st Subscribe to Howcast's other YouTube Channels: Howcast Health Channel - howc.st Howcast Video Games Channel - howc.st Howcast Tech Channel - howc.st Howcast Food Channel - howc.st Howcast Arts & Recreation Channel - howc.st Howcast Sports & Fitness Channel - howc.st Howcast Personal Care & Style Channel - howc.st Howcast empowers people with engaging, useful how-to information wherever, whenever they need to know how. Emphasizing high-quality instructional videos, Howcast brings you experts who provide accurate information in easy-to-follow tutorials on everything from makeup, hairstyling, nail art design, and soccer to parkour, skateboarding, dancing, kissing, and much, much more. Step 1: Have the right topic Before you try to create an article, make sure you have an appropriate topic. Wikipedia wants unbiased, well-sourced information about subjects that are notable enough to appear in an encyclopedia. The site rejects articles that promote or publicize a business; advice -- legal, medical or otherwise; instructional material; travel guides; and news items. Tip Get ideas for topics by typing WP:RA in the search box; a list of articles requested <b>...</b>
3:03
How to Edit a Wikipedia Article
Watch more How to Use Internet Search & Web Browsers videos: www.howcast.com Subscribe...
published: 15 Apr 2010
Author: Howcast
How to Edit a Wikipedia Article
Watch more How to Use Internet Search & Web Browsers videos: www.howcast.com Subscribe to Howcast's YouTube Channel - howc.st Edit a Wikipedia article correctly with these helpful tips. Howcast uploads the highest quality how-to videos daily! Be sure to check out our playlists for guides that interest you: howc.st Subscribe to Howcast's other YouTube Channels: Howcast Health Channel - howc.st Howcast Video Games Channel - howc.st Howcast Tech Channel - howc.st Howcast Food Channel - howc.st Howcast Arts & Recreation Channel - howc.st Howcast Sports & Fitness Channel - howc.st Howcast Personal Care & Style Channel - howc.st Howcast empowers people with engaging, useful how-to information wherever, whenever they need to know how. Emphasizing high-quality instructional videos, Howcast brings you experts who provide accurate information in easy-to-follow tutorials on everything from makeup, hairstyling, nail art design, and soccer to parkour, skateboarding, dancing, kissing, and much, much more. Step 1: Consider opening an account If you're not already a registered Wikipedia user, consider becoming one. If you edit a piece without registering, the site will record your IP address publicly in the article's edit history. With an account, you can also start new pages and upload images. To register, click "create account" at the top right of any page. Step 2: Edit text To get started, click on the "edit this page" tab at the top of the page. This will bring you to a new page with <b>...</b>
6:21
Biology 101.wmv
citing sources we use wiki and nrp.org. for educational purposes and some enjoyment. we di...
published: 07 Jan 2011
Author: Xsakunox
Biology 101.wmv
citing sources we use wiki and nrp.org. for educational purposes and some enjoyment. we did not mean to steal anything. This is for our biology class.
14:28
Part 1 - Introduction to who I am, and a discussion about why I believe in Freedom and Liberty
Hi, this is my first set of videos, so go easy on me in the comments section, and I also t...
published: 12 Aug 2012
Author: UKLibertyBoy
Part 1 - Introduction to who I am, and a discussion about why I believe in Freedom and Liberty
Hi, this is my first set of videos, so go easy on me in the comments section, and I also talk for alot longer than planned ! lol The sources for most of the information discussed in this video are listed below. I know that alot of these sources are from wikipedia, which is not always a reliable infromation source. However, in the case of these wikipedia sources, the authors have cited a good number of books for the various subjects discussed, and I beileve that books are a pretty good source of information. en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org www.enotes.com en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org www.inbrief.co.uk www.direct.gov.uk www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk Note - I also used one real history book to do these set of videos, but I can't be bothered to cite it, as it was hardly used as a source of info lol, sorry.
2:44
Killing Floor - Magnum and Handcannon Penetration
You: Scary, the wiki page for the magnum says it penetrates twice, and the handcannon thre...
published: 06 Jan 2012
Author: im4gh0s7
Killing Floor - Magnum and Handcannon Penetration
You: Scary, the wiki page for the magnum says it penetrates twice, and the handcannon three times and I see people claiming the same on forums. Is that true? www.kf-wiki.com www.kf-wiki.com Me: Why don't we just look at the source code. The wiki authors did look at the source code right? You: I have no idea. They don't cite any sources or link any videos to back up their claims. Me: Well, regardless, why don't we look at the code that implements the handcannon (deagle) and magnum penetration. With your favorite text editor, open DeagleFire.uc and Magnum44Fire.uc You: Okay, I did that and both of them only have one function, DoTrace Me: Yup, now do a line by line compare of the DoTrace function from both files. You: Hey...the code in both functions look... Me: Exactly the same? Like someone copied and pasted it? You: You took the words right out of my mouth. So that means the magnum and deagle have the same penetration stats right? Me: That's right. So looking at the code, if either HitCount gte 10 or HCount gte 4, the tracer stops allocating damage. Since both HitCount and HCount are incremented once per iteration, the tracer stops damaging targets after 4 iterations. So both magnum and deagle can hit 4 targets (3 penetrations), with damage halving after each penetration. You: That's interesting, can you show this to me in game? Me: Of course. Pause the video at 0:43, 1:13, 1:45, 2:17. How many health bars are less than 100%? You: I see 4, just like you said. Wow, those <b>...</b>
2:00
Killing Floor - Scrakes Do Not Have Explosive Resistance
Fast forward to 1:15 for the explosions to start happening. This was made in response to t...
published: 06 Oct 2010
Author: im4gh0s7
Killing Floor - Scrakes Do Not Have Explosive Resistance
Fast forward to 1:15 for the explosions to start happening. This was made in response to this post on the TWI forums: forums.tripwireinteractive.com Basically the guy said Scrakes have explosive resistance because the KF-Wiki says so and that it feels that way in game. I'm sure you can figure out why quoting an unreliable wiki and saying something is true because it feels true is quite silly. The quote in question is "Explosives of any kind, in fact, are not recommended against the Scrake - he takes substantially less damage from them then any other specimen" which can be found on the Scrake page on the KF-Wiki: www.kf-wiki.com My response is basically telling the poster to compare and contrast the source code of the Scrake, Fleshpound, and Husk. If you do the same, you'll notice that the Scrake source code has no mention of the explosive damage types like the way the Fleshpound source code does or the way the Husk handles flame resistance: forums.tripwireinteractive.com To illustrate my point, I made this video to show that Scrakes do not have explosive resistances and that the KF-Wiki can have mistakes which means you should take everything on there with a grain of salt.. If you are talking about KF mechanics and need to back up something you say, copy code from the SDK or list out file names that can be referenced. The source code is something only the devs can modify and can only be interpreted one way whereas the KF-Wiki can be modified by anyone, does not cite <b>...</b>
4:01
Using Wikipedia Wisely
How to use Wikipedia for scholarly research. Emphasis is given to using Wikipedia as a fin...
published: 16 Mar 2012
Author: 1LIONTV
Using Wikipedia Wisely
How to use Wikipedia for scholarly research. Emphasis is given to using Wikipedia as a finding aid. The author discourages students from directly citing Wikipedia entries. Instead, the author illustrates how Wikipedia articles can lead users to authoritative sources and expose useful search terms for use in library databases and catalogs. 3:45 min. Created Jan 24, 2008 using Camtasia Studio. The Camtasia Studio source files and .swf file for this tutorial are available from the ANTS repository at the University of Calgary: dspace.ucalgary.ca This tutorials is licensed to the public using a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
3:36
Using Wikipedia for Academic Research (CLIP)
This tutorial explains how to use Wikipedia as an exploratory tool and where it can approp...
published: 21 Jul 2011
Author: clipinfolit
Using Wikipedia for Academic Research (CLIP)
This tutorial explains how to use Wikipedia as an exploratory tool and where it can appropriately fit in the research process. Created by Michael Baird, Cooperative Library Instruction Project (CLIP) Complete source files and other tutorials are available at the project website: www.clipinfolit.org This tutorial and all other CLIP materials fall under a Creative Commons license (https feel free to share and remix as long as you attribute CLIP, do not use for commercial purposes, and offer your version under the same license.
4:31
Call Of Duty United Offensive Multiplayer Gameplay 1
Call of Duty: United Offensive From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article does not...
published: 01 Nov 2011
Author: PCownsTV
Call Of Duty United Offensive Multiplayer Gameplay 1
Call of Duty: United Offensive From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2009) Call of Duty: United Offensive Coduobox2.jpg Developer(s) Gray Matter Interactive Publisher(s) Activision, Aspyr (Mac) Producer(s) Robb Alvey (senior producer) Ken Turner (producer, Infinity Ward) Designer(s) Dan Koppel Programmer(s) Jed Adams, Alexander Conserva, Ryan Feltrin Artist(s) Corky Lehmkuhl (art director) Writer(s) Michael Schiffer, Richard Farrelly Composer(s) Michael Giacchino Justin Skomarovsky Series Call of Duty Engine Quake III: Team Arena (heavily modified) Version 1.51 (Windows) 1.51b (Mac OS X) Platform(s) Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X Release date(s) NA September 14, 2004 EU September 24, 2004 Genre(s) First-person shooter Mode(s) Single-player, multiplayer Rating(s) BBFC: 15 ESRB: T OFLC: MA15+ PEGI: 16+ USK: 18+ PEGI: 15+ (Finland) System requirements Call of Duty, 800 MHz CPU, 128 MB RAM, 1.15 GB Hard disk space, 32 MB GPU Call of Duty: United Offensive is an expansion pack for the first-person shooter computer game, Call of Duty. It was developed by Gray Matter Interactive, with contributions from Pi Studios, and published by Activision. It was released for Microsoft Windows on September 14, 2004. Since October 13, 2006, the game has also been available to buy on Valve's content delivery <b>...</b>
9:41
Truth of the Times 1 - Examining the Zeitgeist Movement (A Detailed Response w/ Citations)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fictio...
published: 11 Sep 2009
Author: VinnfordSansbury
Truth of the Times 1 - Examining the Zeitgeist Movement (A Detailed Response w/ Citations)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode deals mostly with the opening philisophical outlook that the movie sets up. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information therein. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of science and faith that shake people to the core and should not be so easily written off by any one person or movie with out a shred of evidence. This YouTube series is the living rough draft for the final feature film. All are encouraged to share their thoughts and point out where improvements could be made. If anyone <b>...</b>
2:30
Wikipedia Art documentation video (for Transmediale)
Wikipedia Art is a conceptual art work composed on Wikipedia. Since the work manifested it...
published: 07 Feb 2011
Author: implicitart
Wikipedia Art documentation video (for Transmediale)
Wikipedia Art is a conceptual art work composed on Wikipedia. Since the work manifested itself as a conventional Wikipedia page, art editors were required to follow Wikipedia's enforced standards of quality and verifiability meaning that any changes to the art had to be published on, and cited from, 'credible' external sources such as interviews, blogs, or articles in 'trustworthy' media institutions. Thus the artwork would develop and transform itself simply through their writing and talking about it. Wikipedia Art might start as an intervention, turn into an object, die and be resurrected through a creative pattern / feedback loop of publish-cite-transform that were called 'performative citations'. The ongoing composition and performance of Wikipedia Art is intended to point to the 'invisible authors and authorities' of Wikipedia, and by extension the Internet, as well as the site's extant criticisms: bias, consensus over credentials, reliability, accuracy and vandalism. According to Stern and Kildall, "like knowledge and like art, Wikipedia Art is always already variable." The artists maintain that the project "intervenes in Wikipedia as a venue in the contemporary construction of knowledge and information, and simultaneously intervenes in our understandings of art and the art object".
3:13
wikipedia Heart
A response song and video to Wikipedia art. A collaborative project initiated by Scott Kil...
published: 26 May 2009
Author: Kent Watson
wikipedia Heart
A response song and video to Wikipedia art. A collaborative project initiated by Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern, Wikipedia Art was originally intended to be art composed on Wikipedia, and thus art that anyone can edit. Since the work itself manifested as a conventional Wikipedia page, would-be art editors were required to follow Wikipedias enforced standards of quality and verifiability; any changes to the art had to be published on, and cited from, credible external sources: interviews, blogs, or articles in trustworthy media institutions, which would birth and then slowly transform what the work is and does and means simply through their writing and talking about it. Wikipedia Art, we asserted at its creation, may start as an intervention, turn into an object, die and be resurrected, etc, through a creative pattern / feedback loop of publish-cite-transform that we called performative citations. Despite its live mutations through continuous streams of press online, Wikipedia Art was considered controversial by those in the Wikipedia community, and removed from the site 15 hours after its birth. But the debate and discussion there, and later in the art blogosphere and mainstream press, produced a notable work after all. These communities still transform what the work is and does and means simply through their writing and talking about it, despite its absence from Wikipedia. song by kent watson lyrics by tom and kent watson
Vimeo results:
4:04
SCREEN AGE YOUR FACE by JaBITCH
"Mga tao talaga... KAPAG MAY LUSOT... LULUSOT... kapag di pa NABUKO di AAMIN!...Teka Scree...
published: 15 Mar 2012
Author: JABITCHtv
SCREEN AGE YOUR FACE by JaBITCH
"Mga tao talaga... KAPAG MAY LUSOT... LULUSOT... kapag di pa NABUKO di AAMIN!...Teka Screen Age daw diba? SCREEN AGE YOUR FACE!!!"
FACEBOOK Like Us
https://www.facebook.com/antiJAMICH
TWITTER Follow Us
https://twitter.com/#!/weloveJABITCH
ANOTHER VIMEO Account:
http://vimeo.com/user10698260
“The Answer” by Jamich answered
I wouldn’t mind other peoples’ business, but it has reached the point when I just have to share my thoughts about the issue that’s going on at Facebook.
----------------------------
*Who are you, Jamich?*
Seriously. You act like the two of you are super duper popular, like you have gazillions of followers, like you’re oh so perfect, et al. You shouldn’t act that way. Even (real) celebrities prefer to stay level headed with their fans and followers. You are just ordinary people like the rest of us, you’re nothing special.
Yes, I know, you want to stand above your fans and above the people who follow you – you want to be in control and you are in dire need of money. You want to act like you are that popular couple next door that everyone should pay attention to. I give it to you, people have been paying attention to you, but not because your famous, specially not because of your talents – because I’m pretty sure you have none – but because of how ignorant even your fans are.
I’m not saying that I do, but from what I know is, there’s something you should be good at in order to become famous and act like you’re famous. Yet the only thing that I can see you do well is make up stories, act boastful and ignorant.
----------------------------
*Screen Age*
I don’t think that using a screen age is all too common. Specially here in the local showbiz scene, I doubt that I can cite even more than a handful of celebrities that go by such. You may have brushed off this monkey from your shoulders, but people who have been very watchful and observant these last few days know better.
Yes, a video of yours came out in which it was very detailed laid down how you fooled all of those who loved you.
If people hadn’t been observant about it and followed through and through, malamang walang “The Answer” video na nagaganap. For you it may not have been a big deal, but for everybody else, it is.
----------------------------
*It’s business.*
Well yes, the entertainment industry exists not only to entertain people but also to profit from it. I don’t see the point why you had to say this – it may be a business to you, but the poor fans who believe in you see it this way: “*ang cute niyo”. It really sucks to be one of them now.
----------------------------
*To the fans*
I don’t know why you still believe them or why you still like them. Don’t get me wrong! I respect that since it’s your choice, not mine. One thing that nags me about you guys though is how you react to those who hate your dear celebrity-couple.
Haters will never go away, that’s a given. All of us are hated by someone else out there.
Try to see things from the point of view of a hater. I’m sure that haters would be left at minimal and that none of them would mind stirring up this issue had they (Jamich) not committed such mistakes.
Aminin niyo na, dumadami ang mga di-gusto ng Jamich after their lie on national television.
Don’t say that those who dislike Jamich have no reason to, because I’m sure that they’ve got lots of reason to hate them – specially nowadays. Don’t take it personal. Hindi naman ikaw ang inaaway, eh.
Instead of using God’s name in vain and using clichés such as tao lang sila, nagkakamali din or insecure lang kayo mga haters, try to accept their feedback and reflect on what they have to say. You could pretty much consider me as one of those people who dislike them, but I’m definitely NOT insecure. Of course they are just human to make mistakes, but such blatant lie and that very @#%#$& video… eh?
----------------------------
*To sum it up.*
I could go on and on ranting about them, or particularly just about the “The Answer” video that they created, but I try to leave it with this last part.
This goes out to all of you: Ask yourself, what’s the point of the video “The Answer”? To me, it just looks like they are trying to control the damage AND are not even sorry for what they have done. If they were, they would have titled it “The Apology” or something.
Sobra-sobrang paliwanagan with all those kunwari ganito, kunwari ganiyan. I know a lot of fans can be twisted by your words – knowing that they already favor you – but I don’t think it works so well for the general public. Not only haters, but other people who didn’t mind you before start to go against you. If you want to say sorry about something, then just say you are sorry. Do it sincerely. The video you published showed nothing about sincerity but showed at best how feeling celebrities you two are.
The more you need to explain something, the more guiltier you look IMO.
Fine Print: I
15:01
Arthur Fiedler & The Boston Pops Album #9 (Fantastic 1950s & 1960s Music)
"Moon River" is a song composed by Johnny Mercer (lyrics) and Henry Mancini (music) in 196...
published: 10 Oct 2011
Author: Benjamin Thomas
Arthur Fiedler & The Boston Pops Album #9 (Fantastic 1950s & 1960s Music)
"Moon River" is a song composed by Johnny Mercer (lyrics) and Henry Mancini (music) in 1961, for whom it won that year's Academy Award for Best Original Song. It was originally sung in the movie Breakfast at Tiffany's by Audrey Hepburn, although it has been covered by many other artists. The song also won the 1962 Grammy Award for Record of the Year.
It became the theme song for Andy Williams, who first recorded it in 1961 and performed it at the Academy Awards ceremonies in 1962. He sang the first eight bars at the beginning of his television show and also named his production company and venue in Branson, Missouri after it. Williams' version was disliked by Cadence Records president Archie Bleyer, who believed it had little or no appeal to teenagers.[citation needed] Andy Williams' version never charted, except as an LP track, which he recorded for Columbia in a hit album of 1962.
The success of the song was responsible for re-launching Mercer's career as a songwriter, which had stalled in the mid-1950s because rock and roll replaced jazz standards as the popular music of the time. An inlet near Savannah, Georgia, Johnny Mercer's hometown, was named Moon River in honor of him and this song. The popularity of the song is such that it has been used as a test sample in a study on people's memories of popular songs.
Moon River
Henry Mancini - Moon River-1961.ogg
Theme of Moon River composed by Henry Mancini and Johnny Mercer.
Comments about the song have noted that it is particularly reminiscent of Mercer's youth in the Southern United States.
Audrey Hepburn.
Jerry Butler Danny Williams Andy Williams Art Blakey & The Jazz Messengers (instrumental), Aretha Franklin, Ann Margret in 1962, Jonny Fair (Live), Lena Horne, Nico Fidenco in italian (1962), Jay and the Americans (1962), Bobby Solo in italian (1966), The Afghan Whigs, Paul Anka, Blake, Louis Armstrong, Vic Damone, Billy Stewart in 1965, Bobby Vinton in 1965, Vince Guaraldi, Beru Revue, Mary Black, Sarah Brightman, Liz Callaway, Perry Como, Ben E. King, Ray Conniff, Bobby Darin, Ania Dąbrowska, Dr. John, Dump, Billy Eckstine, The Four Freshmen, Connie Francis, Bill Frisell , Emi Fujita, Judy Garland, Duane Eddy Karel Gott, Grant Green Patty Griffin Milla Jovovich), Bradley Joseph (instrumental), Kim Yoo-jin, James Last, Trini Lopez, Lisa Ono, Joey McIntyre, Johnny Mathis, Brad Mehldau, Jane Monheit, Morrissey, Willie Nelson, Patsy Ann Noble, Eddi Reader, Jim Reeves, John Barrowman, R.E.M., Katie Melua, Andrea Ross, Eartha Kitt, Shirley Bassey, Frank Sinatra, The Killers, Rod Stewart, Barbra Streisand for The Movie Album (2003), Sarah Vaughan, Nan Vernon, Kid Koala, Westlife, Victoria Williams, The Divine Comedy, Tata Young, Tommy Emmanuel (2010), Helmut Lotti, Chiara Civello, Christine Collister, Oscar Peterson (solo piano), Hirai Ken, Rumer, Kazumasa Oda and Khalil Fong.
Mercer himself recorded the song in 1974 My Huckleberry Friend.
In 2007, saxophonist Dave Koz Barry Manilow
Clay Aiken recorded the song on his 2010 album Tried and True. Aiken's version features a guitar solo by country artist Vince Gill.
In August 2011, Alec Merced recorded a version. - Wikipedia
Performances:
This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2011)
Mina performed the song in Canzonissima, the Italian Broadcasting Service series of variety.
Elton John performed the song in his Solo Tour 2003, including the Palais de Festival in Cannes.
Jennifer Love Hewitt performs the song in the biopic The Audrey Hepburn Story, in which Hewitt portrays the actress.
On the singing contest American Idol, Anwar Robinson performed the song during the 2005 season, and Jason Yeager performed the song during the 2008 season.
Canadian turntablist Kid Koala has performed a live version of "Moon River" as part of his sets, mixing and scratching the song on 3 turntables.
In the 1996 Hong Kong film Si Mian Xia Wa ('Four Faces of Eve'), a drunken Chinese man in a nightclub attempts to sing a karaoke version of "Moon River". He sings the lyric in English but with a strong Kowloon accent. His pronunciation of "huckleberry friend" sounds very much like "huckerbelly flend".
Singer/songwriter Patrick Wolf has also sung the opening four lines live as an introduction to his song "The Stars".
It was sung by Niamh on I'd Do Anything.
On the 2003 show, American Juniors, the song was performed by 11 year old contestant, Chauncey Matthews.
In 2009, fashion designer Malan Breton of Project Runway Season 3 performed the song live at a dedication ceremony to Johnny Mercer's 100th.
Eric Clapton performed the song at the London O2 Arena on February 13 and 14 and at Madison Square Garden in New York on February 17 and 18 of 2010 as part of his shows with fellow guitar great Jeff Beck.
Morrissey occasionally performs the song in concert performances, changi
3:12
"Wikipedia Heart," by D. Kent Watson and Tom Watson
an article on the song and piece at DV blog:
http://dvblog.org/?p=3679
The Website
http:...
published: 25 Dec 2010
Author: Kent Watson
"Wikipedia Heart," by D. Kent Watson and Tom Watson
an article on the song and piece at DV blog:
http://dvblog.org/?p=3679
The Website
http://wikipediaart.org/
A collaborative project initiated by Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern, Wikipedia Art was originally intended to be art composed on Wikipedia, and thus art that anyone can edit. Since the work itself manifested as a conventional Wikipedia page, would-be art editors were required to follow Wikipedia’s enforced standards of quality and verifiability; any changes to the art had to be published on, and cited from, ‘credible’ external sources: interviews, blogs, or articles in ‘trustworthy’ media institutions, which would birth and then slowly transform what the work is and does and means simply through their writing and talking about it. Wikipedia Art, we asserted at its creation, may start as an intervention, turn into an object, die and be resurrected, etc, through a creative pattern / feedback loop of publish-cite-transform that we called “performative citations.” Despite its live mutations through continuous streams of press online, Wikipedia Art was considered controversial by those in the Wikipedia community, and removed from the site 15 hours after its birth. But the debate and discussion there, and later in the art blogosphere and mainstream press, produced a notable work after all. These communities still “transform what the work is and does and means simply through their writing and talking about it,” despite its absence from Wikipedia.
0:17
Coalition Of The Willing - Open Source Culture (2010)
My short and laborious section of video for the wonderfully diverse "Coalition Of The Will...
published: 24 Nov 2010
Author: TheLifeGallery
Coalition Of The Willing - Open Source Culture (2010)
My short and laborious section of video for the wonderfully diverse "Coalition Of The Willing" film, written by Tim Rayner and Simon Robson.
Developed in partnership with Simon Robson (aka Knife Party) this section focuses around the diversity of information available on Wikipedia, citing the website as a prime example of open source culture and collaborative information.
Originally created in Full HD, the sequence makes use of a script written by Dan Ebberts in which the playback of a series of sequences is randomised, and arranged into blocks ranging in size from full HD to just a few pixels across as the sequence develops.
I was responsible for direction of the sequence, and the composition of the visuals.
Full write up here:
http://coalitionofthewilling.org.uk/category/collaborators/davebaum/
Audio by EchoLab.
February 2010
Final Cut Pro
Compressor
After Effects
Youtube results:
9:53
The Truth of the Times 6 - Son of the Sun (A Zeitgeist Response and In-Depth Review)
This one took a LOT of research, hence the delay in posting it. Also, I'm very concern...
published: 05 Oct 2009
Author: VinnfordSansbury
The Truth of the Times 6 - Son of the Sun (A Zeitgeist Response and In-Depth Review)
This one took a LOT of research, hence the delay in posting it. Also, I'm very concerned that episode 5 was banned in some countries. I'm curious as to which ones. I tried to re-upload it but to no avail so if you could please leave a comment there and tell me if it works or not in your country that would really help me out. The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode discusses the origin of the cross of the zodiac idea. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information from non-scholarly sources. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of <b>...</b>
8:56
Truth of the Times 2 - Examining the Zeitgeist Movement (A Detailed Response w/ Citations)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fictio...
published: 14 Sep 2009
Author: VinnfordSansbury
Truth of the Times 2 - Examining the Zeitgeist Movement (A Detailed Response w/ Citations)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode deals mostly with the opening philisophical outlook that the movie sets up. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information therein. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of science and faith that shake people to the core and should not be so easily written off by any one person or movie with out a shred of evidence. This YouTube series is the living rough draft for the final feature film. All are encouraged to share their thoughts and point out where improvements could be made. If anyone <b>...</b>
10:22
Muhammad Aisha Pedophile Child Rape Muslim Marriage Law 1 Muhaddith.org
RATE, FAVORITE, SHARE the MAIN video www.youtube.com from muhaddithORG channel to support ...
published: 07 Mar 2008
Author: AwesomeIslam
Muhammad Aisha Pedophile Child Rape Muslim Marriage Law 1 Muhaddith.org
RATE, FAVORITE, SHARE the MAIN video www.youtube.com from muhaddithORG channel to support this campaign to educate people about Islam's IRREPROACHABLE marital laws. This video is in cooperations with youtube.com/muhaddithOrg THIS TEXT IS FROM THE VIDEO WE ARE RESPONDING TO: Islam: How to Divorce Your Muslim Child Bride - The Rules, according to verses of the Quran Muhammad had thighing (rubbing between the thighs) sex with the 6 year old girl Aisha. Mohammed forced Abu Bakr. The invention of Islam to satisfy the immoral sexual desires of Muhammad to molest little girls. Aisha was married against her will, as child sexual abuse, rape, molestations. RE2: originally posted by AtheistAtLarge sick sick SICK SHIT. islamic law not only affirms the prophet molested a 6yr but CONDONES the actions in current islamic society. PLEASE send this to everyone you can, get the word out about this DISGUSTING RELIGION, make it KNOWN Additional links to verify that the law exists: This is a video clip of a well known arabic womans advocate, Ghada Jamshir talking of the thighing practice here's the wikipedia article (yes, it's wikipedia, but they do cite their sources...) I don't read arabic, but apparently (according to wikipedia) the original text can be found here: Buy it on amazon here: ?=== Muhammad Aisha Child bride infant rape marriage law Muslim girl Sex abuse Mohammed Mohammad hudood divorce six year old
10:00
Truth of the Times 3 - The Naked Zeitgeist! (SFW Rated PG)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fictio...
published: 17 Sep 2009
Author: VinnfordSansbury
Truth of the Times 3 - The Naked Zeitgeist! (SFW Rated PG)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode demonstrates two major sources of "inspiration" for the film. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information from non-scholarly sources. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of science and faith that shake people to the core and should not be so easily written off by any one person or movie with out a shred of evidence. This YouTube series is the living rough draft for the final feature film. All are encouraged to share their thoughts and point out where improvements could be made. If <b>...</b>