NT political campaigning under the radar
NT political campaigning under the radar
Posted 42 mins ago

On the surface at least, nothing much has changed since my first two reports on the forthcoming Northern Territory election. The mainstream media campaign is very quiet indeed, even though…

NT political campaigning under the radar
The pathologies of inequality
The pathologies of inequality
Posted 4 hours ago

From the Journal of Economic Perspectives
Why is the rate of teen childbearing is so unusually high in the United States as a whole, and in some U.S. states in particular? U.S. teens…

Don't hold your breath waiting for mass moral outrage
Don’t hold your breath waiting for mass moral outrage
Posted 1 day ago

Troppo author and prominent academic economist Paul Frijters has been banging away for years about how current climate change policies (including carbon pricing) are doomed to failure. The sincere (and…

Sport and the cause of a better world
Sport and the cause of a better world
Posted 1 day ago

My son came home from last night's and this morning's hockey matches with a rainbow coloured band round his wrist with which he was playing on which were printed the words…

Sport and the cause of a better world
The contrast between informed and vox pop opinion
The contrast between informed and vox pop opi…
Posted 5 days ago

I've written before on the cancer of vox pop democracy, where all matters of policy must run the gauntlet of the vox pop test - which is to say that it…

The contrast between informed and vox pop opi…
Welfare quarantining in America
Welfare quarantining in America
Posted 7 days ago

A conservative conspiracy to make government bigger, bury retailers in red tape and tell people how to live their lives, or just another example of populist grandstanding?
The young man…

The Betrayal Of Adam Smith
The Betrayal Of Adam Smith
Posted 7 days ago

I've been thinking about writing something in the wake of Don Arthur's Nanny and the Libertarians post, but until now I haven't had the heart.  Discussion threads on posts dealing…

The Betrayal Of Adam Smith
Bonuses and risk taking: Some experimental evidence to bolster commonsense
Bonuses and risk taking: Some experimental evidence to bolst…
Posted 7 days ago

Incentivizing Calculated Risk-Taking: Evidence from an Experiment with Commercial Bank Loan Officers
By: Shawn Cole (Harvard Business School, Finance Unit), Martin Kanz (World Bank) and Leora Klapper (World Bank)
URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hbs:wpaper:13-002&r;=exp
This paper uses a…

Keeping intellectual property safe from Mickey Mouse diplomacy
Keeping intellectual property safe from Mickey Mouse diploma…
Posted 10 days ago

Here's my column from today's SMH, Age and Brisbane Times.

WHAT are Australia's strategic interests when negotiating with other countries on the extent of intellectual property (IP) rights - for instance,…

A good day for political cartooning
A good day for political cartooning
Posted 10 days ago

(Click on image to enlarge)

PreviousNext

Best From Elsewhere

NT political campaigning under the radar

Gerry Wood

On the surface at least, nothing much has changed since my first two reports on the forthcoming Northern Territory election. The mainstream media campaign is very quiet indeed, even though it’s now less than 5 weeks until polling day.  Almost certainly the parties are saving their money for an ad blitz in the last 3-4 weeks, probably with most concentrated in the last fortnight after the end of the London Olympics. By all accounts both parties are fairly well cashed up. Labor spin doctors make no secret of that claim, while it’s strongly rumoured that the CLP campaign is being heavily bankrolled by eccentric Queensland billionaire Clive Palmer.

However the dearth of MSM coverage certainly doesn’t mean the parties aren’t out there campaigning for all they’re worth.  It’s just that they’re doing it overwhelmingly by “under the radar” targetted direct marketing techniques now typical of modern political campaigning.  Swinging voters in marginal seats are carefully targetted for intensive campaign contact through a combination of doorknock visits, phone canvassing, direct mail, email and SMS.  This contact is largely invisible to the media and other observers and almost by definition impossible for the Electoral Commission to monitor or regulate effectively even if it had the power to do so. These tactics allow the major parties to deliver powerful negative “attack” messages to voters considered most likely to be susceptible to them, without running the risk of alienating safe supporters or galvanising safe voters for one’s opponent.  The Territory’s tiny electorates of less than 4000 voters are ideal for this sort of targetted “under the radar” campaigning.

I was asked by the ABC last week to comment on reports that the ALP was allegedly “push polling” in the suburb of Millner, part of the Labor electorate currently held by retiring Minister Dr Chris Burns. The seat has been rendered vulnerable by the loss of Burns’ incumbency so it’s hardly surprising that Labor is fighting hard to retain it.  Incidentally the tactics as reported to me by the ABC didn’t amount to push polling although they were clearly fairly nasty targetted direct “attack” marketing techniques of the type described above.

On the conservative side legendary federal “black arts” guru Mark Textor has apparently been in Darwin for at least a couple of weeks orchestrating the Country Liberals’ campaign, as has the new Queensland wunderkind James McGrath, former Liberal federal deputy director, LNP campaign manager at the recent Queensland state election and advisor to London lord mayor Boris Johnson.  McGrath was also in the news recently in a slightly different context when he nominated (along with Mal Brough) for LNP preselection for the federal seat of Fisher, currently held by beleaguered Speaker Peter Slipper.

It may or may not be coincidental in those circumstances that the major apparent manifestation of CLP “attack” campaigning to date has been a “smear campaign” spreading four year old “sexual harassment” allegations against Darwin rural Independent Gerry Wood, whose vote keeps the minority Labor government in office.

Continue reading

The pathologies of inequality

From the Journal of Economic Perspectives

Why is the rate of teen childbearing is so unusually high in the United States as a whole, and in some U.S. states in particular? U.S. teens are two and a half times as likely to give birth as compared to teens in Canada, around four times as likely as teens in Germany or Norway, and almost ten times as likely as teens in Switzerland. A teenage girl in Mississippi is four times more likely to give birth than a teenage girl in New Hampshire—and 15 times more likely to give birth as a teen compared to a teenage girl in Switzerland. We examine teen birth rates alongside pregnancy, abortion, and “shotgun” marriage rates as well as the antecedent behaviors of sexual activity and contraceptive use. We demonstrate that variation in income inequality across U.S. states and developed countries can explain a sizable share of the geographic variation in teen childbearing. Our reading of the totality of evidence leads us to conclude that being on a low economic trajectory in life leads many teenage girls to have children while they are young and unmarried. Teen childbearing is explained by the low economic trajectory but is not an additional cause of later difficulties in life. Surprisingly, teen birth itself does not appear to have much direct economic consequence. Our view is that teen childbearing is so high in the United States because of underlying social and economic problems. It reflects a decision among a set of girls to “drop-out” of the economic mainstream; they choose nonmarital motherhood at a young age instead of investing in their own economic progress because they feel they have little chance of advancement.

Kearney, Melissa S., and Phillip B. Levine. 2012. “Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(2): 141–63. DOI:10.1257/jep.26.2.141

Don’t hold your breath waiting for mass moral outrage

Troppo author and prominent academic economist Paul Frijters has been banging away for years about how current climate change policies (including carbon pricing) are doomed to failure. The sincere (and entirely well founded) concerns of scientists and environmentalists about the likely drastic effects of increasing levels of atmospheric greenhouses gases caused by human activity will continue to be thwarted for quite some time yet by an unholy alliance of fossil fuel corporations, cynical politicians and financiers.  The “free rider” effect will continue to make it almost pointless for even sincerely convinced governments to take effective action, and the vast majority of people neither know nor care enough to try to work out who is telling the truth. 11. KP: Paul summarises reality as follows: There is simply this huge difference between what actually goes on and what the mainline public debate on the issue is. The general population is just not interested enough to absorb this stuff. Its too technical and buried in the appendixes of reports that are too hard for most people to understand. And at the end of the day, the population votes for growth before they vote green so they dont really want to know either.  The experts all know what is going on, but even if they bother to vent their views in public, the journos  have to fit their writings within the dominant story on this which is shaped by the big players. So while the underlying realities are visible for those who want to know, for the vast majority the actual issues are over-shadowed by the shouting between the big boys. And think of the incentives of the big players: the opposition is quite happy to go along with the pretence that its the carbon tax that does the job, rather than the bribes and the foreign pretence-reductions. The reason for this is that the opposition thinks the carbon tax can be spun as a vote-winner for them. The civil servants in the Climate change ministries loves the pretence because it makes it seem they are achieving something and are at the international forefront of things. Instead of being seen to have achieved nothing, they suddenly are in charge of internationally debated policies. Woohoo! Industry is happy their lobbying has paid off and they wont be asked to do anything real, so they are happy investing in the emission booms of tomorrow. The Greens have their token success and can pretend to their voters that this is the thin edge of the wedge. And the government is honouring an election pledge and its deal with their coalition partners. So all the big players go along with it for their own reasons and keep quiet about what’s lurking beneath. Similar things go on abroad. At the end of the day, our populations just don’t really care enough about something that might cause problems in the far future, so they want the politicians to pretend to be doing something as long as it doesnt interfere with business as usual. []

Paul’s sundry writings on climate change together make a formidable body of work, which I will link at the foot of this post.  But they’ve been given added impact by recent news about the demise of the much-discussed theory of “peak oil”, by which many hoped that physical reality would soon intervene and compel drastic reductions in human CO2 emissions through huge price increases driven by increasing resource shortage. Those hopes have now been dashed, as George Monbiot despairingly acknowledges:

Peak oil hasn’t happened, and it’s unlikely to happen for a very long time. …

So this is where we are. The automatic correction – resource depletion destroying the machine that was driving it – that many environmentalists foresaw is not going to happen. The problem we face is not that there is too little oil, but that there is too much.

We have confused threats to the living planet with threats to industrial civilisation. They are not, in the first instance, the same thing. Industry and consumer capitalism, powered by abundant oil supplies, are more resilient than many of the natural systems they threaten. The great profusion of life in the past – fossilised in the form of flammable carbon – now jeopardises the great profusion of life in the present.

There is enough oil in the ground to deep-fry the lot of us, and no obvious means to prevail upon governments and industry to leave it in the ground.

Continue reading

Sport and the cause of a better world

My son came home from last night’s and this morning’s hockey matches with a rainbow coloured band round his wrist with which he was playing on which were printed the words “Fair go, sport!”  This is a pilot campaign launched last year by Sports Minister Mark Arbib and it’s some kind of joint venture between the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, and Hockey Australia and Hockey Victoria.

This is from Hockey Victoria’s press release.

Hockey teams around Victoria stand up for fairness and equality

This weekend, hockey clubs around Victoria will throw their support behind Fair go, sport! – a unique project that celebrates sexual and gender diversity in sport by increasing awareness and promoting safe and inclusive sporting environments for everyone.

For the first time ever, Hockey Victoria will host a Fair go, sport! hockey round from Friday 20 July until Wednesday 25 July, comprising of 650 hockey teams of all ages from around the state.

Acting Commissioner Karen Toohey said it was fantastic to see so many clubs getting behind Fair go, sport! and doing what they can to send a strong message that there is no place for homophobia in sport.
“By wearing the Fair go, sport! rainbow socks and wristbands, each team is saying that a player’s sexuality should no longer be cause for comment,” Ms Toohey said.

Wonderful initiative I reckon. Good on all involved. Reminds me of one of my favourite pictures (above).

The contrast between informed and vox pop opinion

I’ve written before on the cancer of vox pop democracy, where all matters of policy must run the gauntlet of the vox pop test – which is to say that it must instantly appeal to a majority of shoppers at Fountain Gate who have a microphone shoved into their face and  asked something like ”Are you in favour of letting pedophiles go scott free so they can repeat offend?”

I’ve always thought that the jury is a fine institution for the way in which it avoids the pitfalls of this kind of thing while being radically democratic. Here we have ordinary people, but they’ve been informed of the case and deliberated on the matter. In talking about Campbell Newman’s implementation of his promise to impose mandatory sentencing this article includes a link to a Tasmanian study in which those who had good knowledge of a case were surveyed to see if they thought the sentence was inadequate or the judge was ‘out of touch’. 90 per cent said no.

I wonder if it might not be salutary to have juries regularly and publicly record their reaction to the judge’s sentence in each case.