59:27
Conversations with History: Richard C. Lewontin
Conversations with History: Richard C. Lewontin
Conversations with History host Harry Kreisler talks with Richard C.Lewontin about scientific inquiry and the role of science in public policy. Series: "Conversations with History" [11/2004] [Public Affairs] [Humanities] [Show ID: 8994]
75:01
The Concept of Race
The Concept of Race
In this Hitchcock Lecture from UC Berkeley, evolutionary geneticist Richard Lewontin reviews a number of studies on the genetic differentiation between individuals within local populations, of local populations within classic geographical races and between races. He shows that almost all human genetic variation is contained between individuals within any local population and that the consequences of repeated migrations, invasions, and mixture between groups destroys any clear racial boundaries. Series: UC Berkeley Graduate Council Lectures [2/2004] [Humanities] [Science] [Show ID: 8456]
58:10
Gene Organism and Environment
Gene Organism and Environment
The standard metaphors used to describe DNA and development are examined, including the claim that DNA "makes" protein, that DNA is "self-replicating" and the organisms "adapt" to their environments. In this lecture by distinguished evolutionary geneticist Richard Lewontin, he explains that DNA is manufactured by the cell machinery, that proteins are folded by rules that are not related to DNA sequence and that organisms, rather than adapting to their environment, are actively engaging in constructing their own environments, so that organisms and environments co-evolve. Series: "UC Berkeley Graduate Council Lectures" [2/2004] [Science] [Show ID: 8393]
46:41
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 2
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 2
Might be copyrighted but honestly we should just be glad if I get people to be interested in this stuff at all :)
42:31
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 1
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 1
Might be copyrighted but honestly we should just be glad if I get people to be interested in this stuff at all :)
9:59
Accounting Theory and the ideas of Richard Lewontin.wmv
Accounting Theory and the ideas of Richard Lewontin.wmv
Accounting Theory and the ideas of Richard Lewontin
48:21
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 3
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 3
Might be copyrighted but honestly we should just be glad if I get people to be interested in this stuff at all :)
48:21
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 5
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 5
Might be copyrighted but honestly we should just be glad if I get people to be interested in this stuff at all :)
48:21
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 4
Richard Lewontin - Biology as Ideology Lecture 4
Might be copyrighted but honestly we should just be glad if I get people to be interested in this stuff at all :)
4:29
Does God Exist - Worldview on the Street
Does God Exist - Worldview on the Street
Does God Exist - A Video from our friends at www.HighwayVideo.com Does God exist? An answer to this fundamental question is a prerequisite for answering the other big questions of life Where did we come from? Why are we here? Do we serve a purpose? Do we have any intrinsic value? What happens after we die? The question of the existence of God is fundamental. Does God Exist - A Philosophical Issue Before we ask the question Does God exist? we first have to deal with our philosophical predispositions. If, for example, I am already dedicated to the philosophical idea that nothing can exist outside of the natural realm (ie there can be no supernatural God), no amount of evidence could convince me otherwise. Asking the question "does God exist?" would be pointless. My answer would be "No, He doesn't," regardless of whether God truly exists or not. The question would be impossible to answer from an evidentiary standpoint simply because anything which God might have done (that is, any supernatural act which might serve as evidence for His existence) would have to be explained away in terms of natural causes, not because we know what those natural causes could possibly be, but simply because a supernatural God is not allowed to exist! Dr. Richard Lewontin, the Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology at Harvard University, put it like this: "It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the <b>...</b>
57:11
Jerry Coyne: "Why Evolution Is True"
Jerry Coyne: "Why Evolution Is True"
socraticmama.com [Inspiration & Support for Secular Families] Jerry explains 'Why Evolution is True' at the Atheist Alliance International 2009 conference whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com Book www.amazon.co.uk www.amazon.com Jerry A. Coyne, Ph.D is a Professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago and a member of both the Committee on Genetics and the Committee on Evolutionary Biology. Coyne received a BS in Biology from the College of William and Mary. He then earned a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology at Harvard University in 1978, working in the laboratory of Richard Lewontin. After a postdoctoral fellowship in Timothy Prout's laboratory at The University of California at Davis, he took his first academic position as assistant professor in the Department of Zoology at The University of Maryland. In 1996 he joined the faculty of The University of Chicago. Coyne's work is focused on understanding the origin of species: the evolutionary process that produces discrete groups in nature. To do this, he uses a variety of genetic analyses to locate and identify the genes that produce reproductive barriers between distinct species of the fruit fly Drosophila: barriers like hybrid sterility, ecological differentiation, and mate discrimination. Through finding patterns in the location and action of such genes, he hopes to work out the evolutionary processes that originally produced genetic change, and to determine whether different pairs of species <b>...</b>
3:21
Does God Exist?
Does God Exist?
Does God exist? An answer to this fundamental question is a prerequisite for answering the other big questions of life: Where did we come from? Why are we here? Do we serve a purpose? Do we have any intrinsic value? What happens after we die? The question of the existence of God is fundamental. Does God Exist - A Philosophical Issue explored by Randall Niles. Before we ask the question "Does God Exist?" we first have to deal with our philosophical predispositions. If, for example, I am already dedicated to the philosophical idea that nothing can exist outside of the natural realm (ie there can be no supernatural God), no amount of evidence could convince me otherwise. Asking the question "does God exist?" would be pointless. My answer would be "No, He doesn't," regardless of whether God truly exists or not. The question would be impossible to answer from an evidentiary standpoint simply because anything which God might have done (that is, any supernatural act which might serve as evidence for His existence) would have to be explained away in terms of natural causes, not because we know what those natural causes could possibly be, but simply because a supernatural God is not allowed to exist! Dr. Richard Lewontin, the Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology at Harvard University, put it like this: "It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our <b>...</b>
61:14
Materialistic philosophy keeps Darwinism alive (Read -Show More)
Materialistic philosophy keeps Darwinism alive (Read -Show More)
The force that keeps evolution alive is not science. Evolution may be maintained by some "scientists," but behind it there is another influence at work. This other influence is materialist philosophy. The theory of evolution is simply materialist philosophy applied to nature, and those who support that philosophy do so despite the scientific evidence.So the question becomes one of whether the materialist point of view is correct. One method of testing whether a philosophy is true or false is to investigate the claims it makes about science by using scientific methods.We can therefore investigate by means of scientific methods the materialist claim that matter has existed for all eternity and that this matter can organize itself without a supramaterial Creator and cause life to begin. When we do this, we see that materialism has already collapsed, because the idea that matter has existed since the beginning of time has been overthrown by the Big Bang theory which shows that the universe was created from nothingness. However, if someone is determined to believe in materialism and puts his devotion to materialist philosophy before everything else, then he will act differently. If he is a materialist first and a scientist second, he will not abandon materialism when he sees that evolution is disproved by science. On the contrary, he will attempt to uphold and defend materialism by trying to support evolution, no matter what. This is exactly the predicament that evolutionists <b>...</b>
10:23
Creation by Allah vs Evolution
Creation by Allah vs Evolution
The force that keeps evolution alive is not science. Evolution may be maintained by some "scientists," but behind it there is another influence at work. This other influence is materialist philosophy. The theory of evolution is simply materialist philosophy applied to nature, and those who support that philosophy do so despite the scientific evidence.So the question becomes one of whether the materialist point of view is correct. One method of testing whether a philosophy is true or false is to investigate the claims it makes about science by using scientific methods.We can therefore investigate by means of scientific methods the materialist claim that matter has existed for all eternity and that this matter can organize itself without a supramaterial Creator and cause life to begin. When we do this, we see that materialism has already collapsed, because the idea that matter has existed since the beginning of time has been overthrown by the Big Bang theory which shows that the universe was created from nothingness. However, if someone is determined to believe in materialism and puts his devotion to materialist philosophy before everything else, then he will act differently. If he is a materialist first and a scientist second, he will not abandon materialism when he sees that evolution is disproved by science. On the contrary, he will attempt to uphold and defend materialism by trying to support evolution, no matter what. This is exactly the predicament that evolutionists <b>...</b>
5:21
Biological Holism
Biological Holism
Response to Wonderist's objections to my characterization of selfish gene theory. Neo-Darwinian approaches to evolution have taught us much about evolution by revealing one mechanism operating therein. However, asserting that the natural selection of genes is responsible for ALL the order we find in the living world is more a result of one's worldview than it is the result of science. Some holistic/complexity biologists to look into for an approach to biology less reductionistic than Dawkins: Stephen Gould: en.wikipedia.org www.nytimes.com Francisco Varela: en.wikipedia.org Stuart Kauffman: en.wikipedia.org Richard Lewontin: en.wikipedia.org Brian Goodwin: en.wikipedia.org Lynn Margulis: en.wikipedia.org
3:14
Jerry Coyne: His book & ear-wiggling, a vestigial trait
Jerry Coyne: His book & ear-wiggling, a vestigial trait
socraticmama.com [Inspiration & Support for Secular Families] Website: whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com Book UK: www.amazon.co.uk Book non-UK: www.amazon.com Oxford University Press video ~ Why evolution is more than just a theory: it is a fact In all the current highly publicized debates about creationism and its descendant "intelligent design," there is an element of the controversy that is rarely mentioned-the evidence, the empirical truth of evolution by natural selection. Even Richard Dawkins and Stephen Jay Gould, while extolling the beauty of evolution and examining case studies, have not focused on the evidence itself. Yet the proof is vast, varied, and magnificent, drawn from many different fields of science. Scientists are observing species splitting into two and are finding more and more fossils capturing change in the past-dinosaurs that have sprouted feathers, fish that have grown limbs. Why Evolution Is True weaves together the many threads of modern work in genetics, paleontology, geology, molecular biology, and anatomy that demonstrate the "indelible stamp" of the processes first proposed by Darwin. In crisp, lucid prose accessible to a wide audience, Why Evolution Is True dispels common misunderstandings and fears about evolution and clearly confirms that this amazing process of change has been firmly established as a scientific truth. Jerry A. Coyne, Ph.D is a Professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago and a member <b>...</b>
8:32
Integral Evolution
Integral Evolution
Integral theory's approach to evolution (at least as represented by Ken Wilber) is often criticized as being indistinguishable from creation science. Rather than denying what Darwin has shown us, though, why can't we just include it as valid and go from there? This doesn't mean that we have to accept all of nature as blind mechanism, accidental gene mutation, etc. That kind of absolutist interpretation is just as metaphysical as Intelligent Design. What it means is that natural selection plays its role along side other mechanisms and complex dynamics that are not fully understood at this point. Julian's blog: julianwalkeryoga.gaia.com Stuart Kauffman: en.wikipedia.org Richard Lewontin: en.wikipedia.org Francisco Varela: en.wikipedia.org
10:07
Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 1 of 3
Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 1 of 3
Dr. Carl Baugh exposes the truth about Charles Darwin, how that he plagiarized some of his findings. Dr. Bough also gives evidence for intelligent design and creation. Creation Ministries - creation.com Other Tags: Charles Darwin The origin of Species Anaximander Enuma Elish Loren C. Eiseley Edward Blyth John Harvard Richard Lewontin Hyperbaric Biosphere Tetralophodon WA Criswell Sir David Attenborough ME Clark University of Illinois Dr. Don Patton World Wide Sedimentary deposit Alvis Delk Fossil Footprint Human Fossil Footprint
10:05
Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 2 of 3
Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 2 of 3
Dr. Carl Baugh exposes the truth about Charles Darwin, how that Darwin plagiarized some of his findings. Dr. Bough also gives evidence for intelligent design and creation. Other Tags: Charles Darwin The origin of Species Anaximander Enuma Elish Loren C. Eiseley Edward Blyth John Harvard Richard Lewontin Hyperbaric Biosphere Tetralophodon WA Criswell Sir David Attenborough ME Clark University of Illinois Dr. Don Patton World Wide Sedimentary deposit Alvis Delk Fossil Footprint Human Fossil Footprint
9:55
Who is "They"
Who is "They"
Read more at: www.theapologetic.wordpress.com The American culture is full of idioms- pithy sayings that are supposed to reflect some sort of philosophy or worldview. Often we hear people say these things in response to conversation topics or plastered to the back of their car on bumper stickers. While some of these sayings may have a rhythmic sound or rhyming words, some are couplets, some appear at first to interject what appears to be open-minded philosophy, and some are just simple statements regarding some political stance. Most of these sayings, however, are ridiculous and when examined for their intellectual fortitude, they are often found wanting. One particular saying spreads like wildfire in the culture but dies the same death as all the others once examined. You may have heard someone said it before "I don't believe in organized religion"
8:02
Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 3 of 3
Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 3 of 3
Dr. Carl Baugh exposes the truth about Charles Darwin, how that Darwin plagiarized some of his findings. Dr. Bough also gives evidence for intelligent design and creation. Other Tags: Charles Darwin The origin of Species Anaximander Enuma Elish Loren C. Eiseley Edward Blyth John Harvard Richard Lewontin Hyperbaric Biosphere Tetralophodon WA Criswell Sir David Attenborough ME Clark University of Illinois Dr. Don Patton World Wide Sedimentary deposit Alvis Delk Fossil Footprint Human Fossil Footprint
57:11
Jerry Coyne - Atheist Alliance International 2009 Conference - Why Evolution Is True
Jerry Coyne - Atheist Alliance International 2009 Conference - Why Evolution Is True
Jerry Coyne explains 'Why Evolution Is True' (also the title of his excellent new book) at the Atheist Alliance International 2009 conference, sponsored by The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Jerry A. Coyne, Ph.D is a Professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago and a member of both the Committee on Genetics and the Committee on Evolutionary Biology. Coyne received a BS in Biology from the College of William and Mary. He then earned a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology at Harvard University in 1978, working in the laboratory of Richard Lewontin. After a postdoctoral fellowship in Timothy Prout's laboratory at The University of California at Davis, he took his first academic position as assistant professor in the Department of Zoology at The University of Maryland. In 1996 he joined the faculty of The University of Chicago. Coyne's work is focused on understanding the origin of species: the evolutionary process that produces discrete groups in nature. To do this, he uses a variety of genetic analyses to locate and identify the genes that produce reproductive barriers between distinct species of the fruit fly Drosophila: barriers like hybrid sterility, ecological differentiation, and mate discrimination. Through finding patterns in the location and action of such genes, he hopes to work out the evolutionary processes that originally produced genetic change, and to determine whether different pairs of species may show <b>...</b>