4:40
How to use Wikipedia to Cite Sources
The Binary Boys are talking again...
published: 19 Feb 2009
author: RockyMtnCollegian
How to use Wikipedia to Cite Sources
The Binary Boys are talking again
1:05
Avoiding Plagiarism: What Do I Need to Cite?
www.criticalthinkeracademy.com Most students understand that they have to cite a source wh...
published: 16 Mar 2010
author: PhilosophyFreak
Avoiding Plagiarism: What Do I Need to Cite?
www.criticalthinkeracademy.com Most students understand that they have to cite a source when the use a direct quote, but many don't understand that they also have to cite the ideas of others, even when they're not quoting. This is a sample video from a video tutorial course titled "How to Cite Sources and Avoid Plagiarism". You can find this and other tutorial courses at http Here's the table of contents: Part 1: What is Plagiarism? 1.1 Plagiarism: the Basic Definition 1.2 Downloading or Buying Whole Papers 1.3 Cutting and Pasting from Several Sources 1.4 Changing Some Words but Copying Whole Phrases 1.5 Paraphrasing Without Attribution 1.6 The Debate Over "Patchwriting" Part 2: How to Cite Sources 2.1 When Should I Cite a Source? 2.2 What Needs to be Cited? 2.3 How to Cite: Mark the Boundaries 2.4 Citing Exact Words 2.5 Citing a Longer Quotation 2.6 Citing a Source But Not Quoting 2.7 A Comment About "Common Knowledge" 2.8 Citation Styles: MLA, APA, CSE, Chicago, Turabian, oh my!
1:31
Find sources and citations from Wikipedia articles easily
The Full Wiki gives you sentences similar to those in Wikipedia articles that you can cite...
published: 24 Feb 2011
author: thefullwiki
Find sources and citations from Wikipedia articles easily
The Full Wiki gives you sentences similar to those in Wikipedia articles that you can cite in your essays.
6:21
Biology 101.wmv
citing sources we use wiki and nrp.org. for educational purposes and some enjoyment. we di...
published: 07 Jan 2011
author: Xsakunox
Biology 101.wmv
citing sources we use wiki and nrp.org. for educational purposes and some enjoyment. we did not mean to steal anything. This is for our biology class.
2:00
Killing Floor - Scrakes Do Not Have Explosive Resistance
Fast forward to 1:15 for the explosions to start happening. This was made in response to t...
published: 06 Oct 2010
author: im4gh0s7
Killing Floor - Scrakes Do Not Have Explosive Resistance
Fast forward to 1:15 for the explosions to start happening. This was made in response to this post on the TWI forums: forums.tripwireinteractive.com Basically the guy said Scrakes have explosive resistance because the KF-Wiki says so and that it feels that way in game. I'm sure you can figure out why quoting an unreliable wiki and saying something is true because it feels true is quite silly. The quote in question is "Explosives of any kind, in fact, are not recommended against the Scrake - he takes substantially less damage from them then any other specimen" which can be found on the Scrake page on the KF-Wiki: www.kf-wiki.com My response is basically telling the poster to compare and contrast the source code of the Scrake, Fleshpound, and Husk. If you do the same, you'll notice that the Scrake source code has no mention of the explosive damage types like the way the Fleshpound source code does or the way the Husk handles flame resistance: forums.tripwireinteractive.com To illustrate my point, I made this video to show that Scrakes do not have explosive resistances and that the KF-Wiki can have mistakes which means you should take everything on there with a grain of salt.. If you are talking about KF mechanics and need to back up something you say, copy code from the SDK or list out file names that can be referenced. The source code is something only the devs can modify and can only be interpreted one way whereas the KF-Wiki can be modified by anyone, does not cite <b>...</b>
3:37
How to Create a Wikipedia Article
Expand the description and view the text of the steps for this how-to video. Check out How...
published: 15 Mar 2010
author: Howcast
How to Create a Wikipedia Article
Expand the description and view the text of the steps for this how-to video. Check out Howcast for other do-it-yourself videos from benoviatt and more videos in the General Internet category. You can contribute too! Create your own DIY guide at www.howcast.com or produce your own Howcast spots with the Howcast Filmmakers Program at www.howcast.com Share your expertise on a subject by writing about it for Wikipedia, the world's biggest encyclopedia. This multilingual, Web-based, free content encyclopedia already contains millions of articles, but there's always room for something new. Why not publish something by you? To complete this How-To you will need: Internet access Notable topic Reliable sources Step 1: Have the right topic Before you try to create an article, make sure you have an appropriate topic. Wikipedia wants unbiased, well-sourced information about subjects that are notable enough to appear in an encyclopedia. The site rejects articles that promote or publicize a business; advice -- legal, medical or otherwise; instructional material; travel guides; and news items. Tip: Get ideas for topics by typing WP:RA in the search box; a list of articles requested by others will appear. Step 2: Source your work Make sure you get the information for your article from a credible, reliable source. Material in books and newspapers is generally considered reliable; the musings of bloggers are not. And don't bother writing about yourself; it's considered a conflict of <b>...</b>
4:01
Using Wikipedia Wisely
How to use Wikipedia for scholarly research. Emphasis is given to using Wikipedia as a fin...
published: 16 Mar 2012
author: 1LIONTV
Using Wikipedia Wisely
How to use Wikipedia for scholarly research. Emphasis is given to using Wikipedia as a finding aid. The author discourages students from directly citing Wikipedia entries. Instead, the author illustrates how Wikipedia articles can lead users to authoritative sources and expose useful search terms for use in library databases and catalogs. 3:45 min. Created Jan 24, 2008 using Camtasia Studio. The Camtasia Studio source files and .swf file for this tutorial are available from the ANTS repository at the University of Calgary: dspace.ucalgary.ca This tutorials is licensed to the public using a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
2:44
Killing Floor - Magnum and Handcannon Penetration
You: Scary, the wiki page for the magnum says it penetrates twice, and the handcannon thre...
published: 06 Jan 2012
author: im4gh0s7
Killing Floor - Magnum and Handcannon Penetration
You: Scary, the wiki page for the magnum says it penetrates twice, and the handcannon three times and I see people claiming the same on forums. Is that true? www.kf-wiki.com www.kf-wiki.com Me: Why don't we just look at the source code. The wiki authors did look at the source code right? You: I have no idea. They don't cite any sources or link any videos to back up their claims. Me: Well, regardless, why don't we look at the code that implements the handcannon (deagle) and magnum penetration. With your favorite text editor, open DeagleFire.uc and Magnum44Fire.uc You: Okay, I did that and both of them only have one function, DoTrace Me: Yup, now do a line by line compare of the DoTrace function from both files. You: Hey...the code in both functions look... Me: Exactly the same? Like someone copied and pasted it? You: You took the words right out of my mouth. So that means the magnum and deagle have the same penetration stats right? Me: That's right. So looking at the code, if either HitCount gte 10 or HCount gte 4, the tracer stops allocating damage. Since both HitCount and HCount are incremented once per iteration, the tracer stops damaging targets after 4 iterations. So both magnum and deagle can hit 4 targets (3 penetrations), with damage halving after each penetration. You: That's interesting, can you show this to me in game? Me: Of course. Pause the video at 0:43, 1:13, 1:45, 2:17. How many health bars are less than 100%? You: I see 4, just like you said. Wow, those <b>...</b>
4:31
Call Of Duty United Offensive Multiplayer Gameplay 1
Call of Duty: United Offensive From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article does not...
published: 01 Nov 2011
author: PCownsTV
Call Of Duty United Offensive Multiplayer Gameplay 1
Call of Duty: United Offensive From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2009) Call of Duty: United Offensive Coduobox2.jpg Developer(s) Gray Matter Interactive Publisher(s) Activision, Aspyr (Mac) Producer(s) Robb Alvey (senior producer) Ken Turner (producer, Infinity Ward) Designer(s) Dan Koppel Programmer(s) Jed Adams, Alexander Conserva, Ryan Feltrin Artist(s) Corky Lehmkuhl (art director) Writer(s) Michael Schiffer, Richard Farrelly Composer(s) Michael Giacchino Justin Skomarovsky Series Call of Duty Engine Quake III: Team Arena (heavily modified) Version 1.51 (Windows) 1.51b (Mac OS X) Platform(s) Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X Release date(s) NA September 14, 2004 EU September 24, 2004 Genre(s) First-person shooter Mode(s) Single-player, multiplayer Rating(s) BBFC: 15 ESRB: T OFLC: MA15+ PEGI: 16+ USK: 18+ PEGI: 15+ (Finland) System requirements Call of Duty, 800 MHz CPU, 128 MB RAM, 1.15 GB Hard disk space, 32 MB GPU Call of Duty: United Offensive is an expansion pack for the first-person shooter computer game, Call of Duty. It was developed by Gray Matter Interactive, with contributions from Pi Studios, and published by Activision. It was released for Microsoft Windows on September 14, 2004. Since October 13, 2006, the game has also been available to buy on Valve's content delivery <b>...</b>
9:53
The Truth of the Times 6 - Son of the Sun (A Zeitgeist Response and In-Depth Review)
This one took a LOT of research, hence the delay in posting it. Also, I'm very concern...
published: 05 Oct 2009
author: VinnfordSansbury
The Truth of the Times 6 - Son of the Sun (A Zeitgeist Response and In-Depth Review)
This one took a LOT of research, hence the delay in posting it. Also, I'm very concerned that episode 5 was banned in some countries. I'm curious as to which ones. I tried to re-upload it but to no avail so if you could please leave a comment there and tell me if it works or not in your country that would really help me out. The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode discusses the origin of the cross of the zodiac idea. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information from non-scholarly sources. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of <b>...</b>
3:36
Using Wikipedia for Academic Research (CLIP)
This tutorial explains how to use Wikipedia as an exploratory tool and where it can approp...
published: 21 Jul 2011
author: clipinfolit
Using Wikipedia for Academic Research (CLIP)
This tutorial explains how to use Wikipedia as an exploratory tool and where it can appropriately fit in the research process. Created by Michael Baird, Cooperative Library Instruction Project (CLIP) Complete source files and other tutorials are available at the project website: www.clipinfolit.org This tutorial and all other CLIP materials fall under a Creative Commons license (https feel free to share and remix as long as you attribute CLIP, do not use for commercial purposes, and offer your version under the same license.
9:41
Truth of the Times 1 - Examining the Zeitgeist Movement (A Detailed Response w/ Citations)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fictio...
published: 11 Sep 2009
author: VinnfordSansbury
Truth of the Times 1 - Examining the Zeitgeist Movement (A Detailed Response w/ Citations)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode deals mostly with the opening philisophical outlook that the movie sets up. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information therein. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of science and faith that shake people to the core and should not be so easily written off by any one person or movie with out a shred of evidence. This YouTube series is the living rough draft for the final feature film. All are encouraged to share their thoughts and point out where improvements could be made. If anyone <b>...</b>
3:13
wikipedia Heart
A response song and video to Wikipedia art. A collaborative project initiated by Scott Kil...
published: 26 May 2009
author: kenter2000
wikipedia Heart
A response song and video to Wikipedia art. A collaborative project initiated by Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern, Wikipedia Art was originally intended to be art composed on Wikipedia, and thus art that anyone can edit. Since the work itself manifested as a conventional Wikipedia page, would-be art editors were required to follow Wikipedias enforced standards of quality and verifiability; any changes to the art had to be published on, and cited from, credible external sources: interviews, blogs, or articles in trustworthy media institutions, which would birth and then slowly transform what the work is and does and means simply through their writing and talking about it. Wikipedia Art, we asserted at its creation, may start as an intervention, turn into an object, die and be resurrected, etc, through a creative pattern / feedback loop of publish-cite-transform that we called performative citations. Despite its live mutations through continuous streams of press online, Wikipedia Art was considered controversial by those in the Wikipedia community, and removed from the site 15 hours after its birth. But the debate and discussion there, and later in the art blogosphere and mainstream press, produced a notable work after all. These communities still transform what the work is and does and means simply through their writing and talking about it, despite its absence from Wikipedia. song by kent watson lyrics by tom and kent watson
2:30
Wikipedia Art documentation video (for Transmediale)
Wikipedia Art is a conceptual art work composed on Wikipedia. Since the work manifested it...
published: 07 Feb 2011
author: implicitart
Wikipedia Art documentation video (for Transmediale)
Wikipedia Art is a conceptual art work composed on Wikipedia. Since the work manifested itself as a conventional Wikipedia page, art editors were required to follow Wikipedia's enforced standards of quality and verifiability meaning that any changes to the art had to be published on, and cited from, 'credible' external sources such as interviews, blogs, or articles in 'trustworthy' media institutions. Thus the artwork would develop and transform itself simply through their writing and talking about it. Wikipedia Art might start as an intervention, turn into an object, die and be resurrected through a creative pattern / feedback loop of publish-cite-transform that were called 'performative citations'. The ongoing composition and performance of Wikipedia Art is intended to point to the 'invisible authors and authorities' of Wikipedia, and by extension the Internet, as well as the site's extant criticisms: bias, consensus over credentials, reliability, accuracy and vandalism. According to Stern and Kildall, "like knowledge and like art, Wikipedia Art is always already variable." The artists maintain that the project "intervenes in Wikipedia as a venue in the contemporary construction of knowledge and information, and simultaneously intervenes in our understandings of art and the art object".
8:56
Truth of the Times 2 - Examining the Zeitgeist Movement (A Detailed Response w/ Citations)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fictio...
published: 14 Sep 2009
author: VinnfordSansbury
Truth of the Times 2 - Examining the Zeitgeist Movement (A Detailed Response w/ Citations)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode deals mostly with the opening philisophical outlook that the movie sets up. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information therein. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of science and faith that shake people to the core and should not be so easily written off by any one person or movie with out a shred of evidence. This YouTube series is the living rough draft for the final feature film. All are encouraged to share their thoughts and point out where improvements could be made. If anyone <b>...</b>
10:00
Truth of the Times 3 - The Naked Zeitgeist! (SFW Rated PG)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fictio...
published: 17 Sep 2009
author: VinnfordSansbury
Truth of the Times 3 - The Naked Zeitgeist! (SFW Rated PG)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode demonstrates two major sources of "inspiration" for the film. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information from non-scholarly sources. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of science and faith that shake people to the core and should not be so easily written off by any one person or movie with out a shred of evidence. This YouTube series is the living rough draft for the final feature film. All are encouraged to share their thoughts and point out where improvements could be made. If <b>...</b>
10:22
Muhammad Aisha Pedophile Child Rape Muslim Marriage Law 1 Muhaddith.org
RATE, FAVORITE, SHARE the MAIN video www.youtube.com from muhaddithORG channel to support ...
published: 07 Mar 2008
author: AwesomeIslam
Muhammad Aisha Pedophile Child Rape Muslim Marriage Law 1 Muhaddith.org
RATE, FAVORITE, SHARE the MAIN video www.youtube.com from muhaddithORG channel to support this campaign to educate people about Islam's IRREPROACHABLE marital laws. This video is in cooperations with youtube.com/muhaddithOrg THIS TEXT IS FROM THE VIDEO WE ARE RESPONDING TO: Islam: How to Divorce Your Muslim Child Bride - The Rules, according to verses of the Quran Muhammad had thighing (rubbing between the thighs) sex with the 6 year old girl Aisha. Mohammed forced Abu Bakr. The invention of Islam to satisfy the immoral sexual desires of Muhammad to molest little girls. Aisha was married against her will, as child sexual abuse, rape, molestations. RE2: originally posted by AtheistAtLarge sick sick SICK SHIT. islamic law not only affirms the prophet molested a 6yr but CONDONES the actions in current islamic society. PLEASE send this to everyone you can, get the word out about this DISGUSTING RELIGION, make it KNOWN Additional links to verify that the law exists: This is a video clip of a well known arabic womans advocate, Ghada Jamshir talking of the thighing practice here's the wikipedia article (yes, it's wikipedia, but they do cite their sources...) I don't read arabic, but apparently (according to wikipedia) the original text can be found here: Buy it on amazon here: ?=== Muhammad Aisha Child bride infant rape marriage law Muslim girl Sex abuse Mohammed Mohammad hudood divorce six year old
9:46
Water on the Moon - The Loon and the Moon (Part I)
Part one of the response to Nephilimfree's bold statements on how the water ice recent...
published: 24 Nov 2009
author: paulchartley
Water on the Moon - The Loon and the Moon (Part I)
Part one of the response to Nephilimfree's bold statements on how the water ice recently found on the moon is a direct result of water splash from the great flood I would cite my sources however as most of this is just common sense and Nephilimfree never cites his sources I dont see why I should Everything technical that I state in this video is either simple maths and so can either be checked with a pencil and paper or its on wikipedia so its easily accesible for all
6:19
HowTheWorldWorks, the Conspiracy Theorist
Unlike, HowTheWorldWorks works, I'll try to cite all of the relevant sources. HowTheWo...
published: 31 Mar 2009
author: antybu86
HowTheWorldWorks, the Conspiracy Theorist
Unlike, HowTheWorldWorks works, I'll try to cite all of the relevant sources. HowTheWorldWorks's video which I am responding to: www.youtube.com Thunderf00t's video which HowTheWorldWorks was responding to: www.youtube.com HowTheWorldWorks's blogspam source: blogs.news.com.au The actual source that HowTheWorldWorks should have used: www.climateaudit.org McIntyre Wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org Honors for this video: #17 - Most Discussed (Today) - Education #45 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Canada #55 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - United Kingdom #95 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Ireland #72 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education #40 - Top Favorited (Today) - Education #17 - Top Rated (Today) - Education
8:36
Truth of the Times 4 - The Sun VS The Snake (An in depth Zeitgeist Movie Response and Review)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fictio...
published: 21 Sep 2009
author: VinnfordSansbury
Truth of the Times 4 - The Sun VS The Snake (An in depth Zeitgeist Movie Response and Review)
The purpose of this series is 2-fold. First, I wish to bring to light the facts and fiction of the Zeitgeist movie and the movement in general. Secondly, I hope this video will serve as an example to other YouTube users as to the proper way to make a response video, namely cite all of your sources with at least a hyperlink if not APA or MLA. This allows people to see where you are coming from. What made Zeitgeist so engrossing was the flood of new information which formed a coherent argument with out having to cite sources or discuss which parts were only theory. This episode shows the sun is NOT the most adored object of all time. Some of my research in further episodes will show that many of the central themes in the film can be found in the discussion portion of Wikipedia articles as ideas that literally just came out of nowhere or poor attention to the detail of the origin of images and information from non-scholarly sources. I have seen a lot of responses to this film and finally decided that I should really make one to top them all by digging to the very source of each and every argument and presenting it alongside the response. These are issues of science and faith that shake people to the core and should not be so easily written off by any one person or movie with out a shred of evidence. This YouTube series is the living rough draft for the final feature film. All are encouraged to share their thoughts and point out where improvements could be made. If anyone <b>...</b>
3:28
Using Wikipedia for Academic Research
Learn how you can find sources and start college-level research by using Wikipedia....
published: 26 Oct 2011
author: TheHartnessLibrary
Using Wikipedia for Academic Research
Learn how you can find sources and start college-level research by using Wikipedia.
10:57
Muhammad Aisha Pedophile Child Rape Muslim Marriage Law 2
RATE, FAVORITE, SHARE the MAIN video www.youtube.com from muhaddithORG channel to support ...
published: 24 Mar 2008
author: AwesomeIslam
Muhammad Aisha Pedophile Child Rape Muslim Marriage Law 2
RATE, FAVORITE, SHARE the MAIN video www.youtube.com from muhaddithORG channel to support this campaign to educate people about Islam's IRREPROACHABLE marital laws. This video is in cooperations with youtube.com/muhaddithOrg THIS TEXT IS FROM THE VIDEO WE ARE RESPONDING TO: Islam: How to Divorce Your Muslim Child Bride - The Rules, according to verses of the Quran Muhammad had thighing (rubbing between the thighs) sex with the 6 year old girl Aisha. Mohammed forced Abu Bakr. The invention of Islam to satisfy the immoral sexual desires of Muhammad to molest little girls. Aisha was married against her will, as child sexual abuse, rape, molestations. THIS TEXT IS FROM THE VIDEO WE ARE RESPONDING TO: originally posted by AtheistAtLarge sick sick SICK SHIT. islamic law not only affirms the prophet molested a 6yr but CONDONES the actions in current islamic society. PLEASE send this to everyone you can, get the word out about this DISGUSTING RELIGION, make it KNOWN Additional links to verify that the law exists: This is a video clip of a well known arabic womans advocate, Ghada Jamshir talking of the thighing practice here's the wikipedia article (yes, it's wikipedia, but they do cite their sources...) I don't read arabic, but apparently (according to wikipedia) the original text can be found here: Buy it on amazon here: ?=== Muhammad Aisha Child bride infant rape marriage law Muslim girl Sex abuse Mohammed Mohammad hudood divorce six year old