- Order:
- Duration: 7:35
- Published: 15 Feb 2010
- Uploaded: 03 Sep 2011
- Author: manwomanmyth
Misandry () is the hatred of men or boys. Misandry comes from Greek misos (μῖσος, "hatred") and anēr, andros (ἀνήρ, gen. ἀνδρός; "man"). Misandry is the antonym of , the fondness towards men, love, or admiration of them.
Julie M. Thompson, a feminist author, connects misandry with envy of men, in particular "penis envy", a term coined by Sigmund Freud in 1908, in his theory of female sexual development.
Religious Studies professors Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young made similar comparisons in their 2001, three-book series Beyond the Fall of Man, which treats misandry as a form of prejudice and discrimination that has become institutionalized in North American society.
In the 2007 book, International Encyclopedia of Men and Masculinities, Marc A. Ouellette directly contrasted misandry and misogyny, arguing that "misandry lacks the systemic, transhistoric, institutionalized, and legislated antipathy of misogyny".
In his 1997 book The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy, sociologist Allan G. Johnson stated that accusations of man-hating work to discredit feminism because people often confuse men as individuals with men as a dominant and privileged category of people. He wrote that given the "reality of women's oppression, male privilege, and men's enforcement of both, it's hardly surprising that every woman should have moments where she resents or even hates 'men' ".
Nathanson and Young argued that "ideological feminism" has imposed misandry on culture. Their 2001 book, Spreading Misandry, analyzed "pop cultural artifacts and productions from the 1990s" from movies to greeting cards for what they consider contained pervasive messages of hatred toward men. Legalizing Misandry (2005), the second in the series, gave similar attention to laws in North America.
In 2002, pundit Charlotte Hays wrote "that the anti-male philosophy of radical feminism has filtered into the culture at large is incontestable; indeed, this attitude has become so pervasive that we hardly notice it any longer".
By ambiguously defining what constitutes a reasonable argument for innocence, the law leaves open the possibility of a lowered burden of proof and increased severity of punishment for groups of people who may reasonably be thought to be more likely to commit crime. Changing social perceptions of men and women have led to troubling statistics demonstrating judicial bias against men in convictions, severity of punishments, and subsequent exoneration due to new evidence (such as DNA profiling). For example, the US Bureau of Judice Statistics shows that women are 50% more likely than men to avoid a murder conviction for extrajudicial killings (women account for 12.0% of extrajudicial killings, but only 8.0% of all murder convictions). Once a murder conviction takes place, men are five times more likely to be sentenced to death (98.2% of all death row inmates are men, 3291 men compared to 59 women). Once on death row, women are 50% less likely to be executed compared to men (since 1970, 1099 men executed compared to 11 women).
While it is easy to point out statistical evidence of judicial bias, it is much more difficult to demonstrate unambiguous proof of judicial bias against individual men convicted of specific crimes, though this is true of other types of discrimination as well, whether against women, men, blacks, or whites. Those working against discrimination often have to deal with a large number of variables.
Category:Gender Category:Misandry Category:Sexual and gender prejudices
This text is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA License. This text was originally published on Wikipedia and was developed by the Wikipedia community.