name | Pluto |
---|
symbol | |
---|
discovery | yes |
---|
discoverer | Clyde W. Tombaugh |
---|
discovered | February 18, 1930 |
---|
mp name | 134340 Pluto |
---|
named after | Pluto |
---|
mp category | |
---|
epoch | J2000 |
---|
aphelion | |
---|
perihelion | (1989 Sep 05) |
---|
semimajor | |
---|
eccentricity | 0.248 807 66 |
---|
inclination | |
---|
asc node | 110.303 47° |
---|
arg peri | 113.763 29° |
---|
period | |
---|
synodic period | 366.73 days |
---|
avg speed | 4.666 km/s |
---|
mean anomaly | 14.86012204° |
---|
satellites | 4 |
---|
physical characteristics | yes |
---|
mean radius | |
---|
surface area | |
---|
volume | |
---|
mass | |
---|
density | 2.03 ± 0.06 g/cm3 |
---|
surface grav | |
---|
escape velocity | km/s |
---|
sidereal day | |
---|
rot velocity | 47.18 km/h |
---|
axial tilt | 119.591 ± 0.014° (to orbit) |
---|
right asc north pole | 312.993°
Pluto has four known moons, the largest being Charon discovered in 1978, along with Nix and Hydra, discovered in 2005, and the provisionally named S/2011 P 1, discovered in 2011. Pluto and Charon are sometimes described as a binary system because the barycenter of their orbits does not lie within either body. However, the IAU has yet to formalise a definition for binary dwarf planets, and as such Charon is officially classified as a moon of Pluto.
Discovery
In the 1840s, using Newtonian mechanics, Urbain Le Verrier predicted the position of the then-undiscovered planet Neptune after analysing perturbations in the orbit of Uranus. Subsequent observations of Neptune in the late 19th century caused astronomers to speculate that Uranus' orbit was being disturbed by another planet besides Neptune. In 1906, Percival Lowell, a wealthy Bostonian who had founded the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona in 1894, started an extensive project in search of a possible ninth planet, which he termed "Planet X". By 1909, Lowell and William H. Pickering had suggested several possible celestial coordinates for such a planet. Lowell and his observatory conducted his search until his death in 1916, but to no avail. Unknown to Lowell, on March 19, 1915, his observatory had captured two faint images of Pluto, but did not recognise them for what they were. Lowell was not the first to unknowingly photograph Pluto. There are sixteen known pre-discoveries, with the oldest being made by the Yerkes Observatory on August 20, 1909.
Due to a ten-year legal battle with Constance Lowell, Percival's widow, who attempted to wrest the observatory's million-dollar portion of his legacy for herself, the search for Planet X did not resume until 1929, when its director, Vesto Melvin Slipher, summarily handed the job of locating Planet X to Clyde Tombaugh, a 23-year-old Kansan who had just arrived at the Lowell Observatory after Slipher had been impressed by a sample of his astronomical drawings.
Tombaugh's task was to systematically image the night sky in pairs of photographs taken two weeks apart, then examine each pair and determine whether any objects had shifted position. Using a machine called a blink comparator, he rapidly shifted back and forth between views of each of the plates to create the illusion of movement of any objects that had changed position or appearance between photographs. On February 18, 1930, after nearly a year of searching, Tombaugh discovered a possible moving object on photographic plates taken on January 23 and January 29 of that year. A lesser-quality photograph taken on January 21 helped confirm the movement. After the observatory obtained further confirmatory photographs, news of the discovery was telegraphed to the Harvard College Observatory on March 13, 1930.
Name
The discovery made headlines across the globe. The Lowell Observatory, which had the right to name the new object, received over 1,000 suggestions from all over the world, ranging from Atlas to Zymal. Tombaugh urged Slipher to suggest a name for the new object quickly before someone else did. Constance Lowell proposed ''Zeus'', then ''Percival'' and finally ''Constance''. These suggestions were disregarded.
The name Pluto was proposed by Venetia Burney (1918–2009), an eleven-year-old schoolgirl in Oxford, England. Venetia was interested in classical mythology as well as astronomy, and considered the name, a name for the god of the underworld, appropriate for such a presumably dark and cold world. She suggested it in a conversation with her grandfather Falconer Madan, a former librarian at the University of Oxford's Bodleian Library. Madan passed the name to Professor Herbert Hall Turner, who then cabled it to colleagues in the United States.
The object was officially named on March 24, 1930. Each member of the Lowell Observatory was allowed to vote on a short-list of three: Minerva (which was already the name for an asteroid), Cronus (which had lost reputation through being proposed by the unpopular astronomer Thomas Jefferson Jackson See), and Pluto. Pluto received every vote. The name was announced on May 1, 1930. Upon the announcement, Madan gave Venetia five pounds (£5) (£|r0}} |
---|
}} as of ), as a reward.
It has been noted that the first two letters of ''Pluto'' are the initials of Percival Lowell, and Pluto's astronomical symbol (20px|) is a monogram constructed from the letters 'PL'. When an object with no atmosphere moves in front of a star, the star abruptly disappears; in the case of Pluto, the star dimmed out gradually. From the rate of dimming, the atmospheric pressure was determined to be 0.15 pascal, roughly 1/700,000 that of Earth.
In 2002, another occultation of a star by Pluto was observed and analysed by teams led by Bruno Sicardy of the Paris Observatory,
|-
! scope="col" colspan="2" | Name
(Pronunciation)
! scope="col" | Discovery Year
! scope="col" | Diameter (km)
! scope="col" | Mass (kg)
! scope="col" | Orbital radius (km) (barycentric)
! scope="col" | Orbital period (d)
|-
! scope="row" | Pluto
|
| 1930
| 2,306 (66% Moon)
| 13,050 (18% Moon)
| 2,040 (0.6% Moon)
|
|-
! scope="row" | Charon
| ,
| 1978
| 1,205 (35% Moon)
| 1,520 (2% Moon)
| 17,530 (5% Moon)
| 6.3872 (25% Moon)
|-
! scope="row" | Nix
|
| 2005
| 91
| 4
| 48,708
| 24.856
|-
! scope="row" | S/2011 P 1
|
| 2011
| 13–34
|
| ~59,000
| 32.1
|-
! scope="row" | Hydra
|
| 2005
| 114
| 8
| 64,749
| 38.206
|}
Mass of Nix and Hydra assumes icy/porous density of 1.0 g/cm3
Pluto's origin and identity had long puzzled astronomers. One early hypothesis was that Pluto was an escaped moon of Neptune, knocked out of orbit by its largest current moon, Triton. This notion has been heavily criticised because Pluto never comes near Neptune in its orbit.
Pluto's true place in the Solar System began to reveal itself only in 1992, when astronomers began to find small icy objects beyond Neptune that were similar to Pluto not only in orbit but also in size and composition. This trans-Neptunian population is believed to be the source of many short-period comets. Astronomers now believe Pluto to be the largest member of the Kuiper belt, a somewhat stable ring of objects located between 30 and 50 AU from the Sun. Like other Kuiper-belt objects (KBOs), Pluto shares features with comets; for example, the solar wind is gradually blowing Pluto's surface into space, in the manner of a comet. If Pluto were placed as near to the Sun as Earth, it would develop a tail, as comets do.
Though Pluto is the largest of the Kuiper belt objects discovered so far, Neptune's moon Triton, which is slightly larger than Pluto, is similar to it both geologically and atmospherically, and is believed to be a captured Kuiper belt object. Eris (see below) is also larger than Pluto but is not strictly considered a member of the Kuiper belt population. Rather, it is considered a member of a linked population called the scattered disc.
A large number of Kuiper belt objects, like Pluto, possess a 3:2 orbital resonance with Neptune. KBOs with this orbital resonance are called "plutinos", after Pluto.
Like other members of the Kuiper belt, Pluto is thought to be a residual planetesimal; a component of the original protoplanetary disc around the Sun that failed to fully coalesce into a full-fledged planet. Most astronomers agree that Pluto owes its current position to a sudden migration undergone by Neptune early in the Solar System's formation. As Neptune migrated outward, it approached the objects in the proto-Kuiper belt, setting one in orbit around itself, which became its moon Triton, locking others into resonances and knocking others into chaotic orbits. The objects in the scattered disc, a dynamically unstable region overlapping the Kuiper belt, are believed to have been placed in their current positions by interactions with Neptune's migrating resonances. A 2004 computer model by Alessandro Morbidelli of the Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur in Nice suggested that the migration of Neptune into the Kuiper belt may have been triggered by the formation of a 1:2 resonance between Jupiter and Saturn, which created a gravitational push that propelled both Uranus and Neptune into higher orbits and caused them to switch places, ultimately doubling Neptune's distance from the Sun. The resultant expulsion of objects from the proto-Kuiper belt could also explain the Late Heavy Bombardment 600 million years after the Solar System's formation and the origin of Jupiter's Trojan asteroids. It is possible that Pluto had a near-circular orbit about 33 AU from the Sun before Neptune's migration perturbed it into a resonant capture. The Nice model requires that there were about a thousand Pluto-sized bodies in the original planetesimal disk; these may have included the bodies which became Triton and Eris.
Pluto presents significant challenges for spacecraft because of its small mass and great distance from Earth. ''
Voyager 1'' could have visited Pluto, but controllers opted instead for a close flyby of
Saturn's moon Titan, resulting in a trajectory incompatible with a Pluto flyby. ''
Voyager 2'' never had a plausible trajectory for reaching Pluto. No serious attempt to explore Pluto by spacecraft occurred until the last decade of the 20th century. In August 1992,
JPL scientist
Robert Staehle telephoned Pluto's discoverer,
Clyde Tombaugh, requesting permission to visit his planet. "I told him he was welcome to it," Tombaugh later remembered, "though he's got to go one long, cold trip." Despite this early momentum, in 2000, NASA cancelled the ''
Pluto Kuiper Express'' mission, citing increasing costs and launch vehicle delays.
After an intense political battle, a revised mission to Pluto, dubbed ''New Horizons'', was granted funding from the US government in 2003. ''New Horizons'' was launched successfully on January 19, 2006. The mission leader, S. Alan Stern, confirmed that some of the ashes of Clyde Tombaugh, who died in 1997, had been placed aboard the spacecraft.
In early 2007 the craft made use of a gravity assist from Jupiter. Its closest approach to Pluto will be on July 14, 2015; scientific observations of Pluto will begin 5 months before closest approach and will continue for at least a month after the encounter. ''New Horizons'' captured its first (distant) images of Pluto in late September 2006, during a test of the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI). The images, taken from a distance of approximately 4.2 billion kilometres, confirm the spacecraft's ability to track distant targets, critical for maneuvering toward Pluto and other Kuiper Belt objects.
''New Horizons'' will use a remote sensing package that includes imaging instruments and a radio science investigation tool, as well as spectroscopic and other experiments, to characterise the global geology and morphology of Pluto and its moon Charon, map their surface composition and analyse Pluto's neutral atmosphere and its escape rate. ''New Horizons'' will also photograph the surfaces of Pluto and Charon.
The discovery of Pluto's two small moons, Nix and Hydra, may present unforeseen challenges for the probe. Debris from collisions between Kuiper belt objects and the smaller moons, with their relatively low escape velocities, may produce a tenuous dusty ring. Were New Horizons to fly through such a ring system, there would be an increased potential for damage that could disable the probe.
A Pluto orbiter/lander/sample return mission was proposed in 2003. The plan included a twelve-year trip from Earth to Pluto, mapping from orbit, multiple landings, a warm water probe, and possible ''in situ'' propellant production for another twelve-year trip back to Earth with samples. Power and propulsion would come from the bimodal MITEE nuclear reactor system.
After Pluto's place within the Kuiper belt was determined, its official status as a planet became controversial, with many questioning whether Pluto should be considered together with or separately from its surrounding population.
Museum and planetarium directors occasionally created controversy by omitting Pluto from planetary models of the Solar System. The Hayden Planetarium reopened after renovation in 2000 with a model of only eight planets. The controversy made headlines at the time.
In 2002, the KBO 50000 Quaoar was discovered, with a diameter then thought to be roughly 1280 kilometres, about half that of Pluto. In 2004, the discoverers of 90377 Sedna placed an upper limit of 1800 km on its diameter, nearer to Pluto's diameter of 2320 km, although Sedna's diameter was revised downward to less than 1600 km by 2007. Just as Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta eventually lost their planet status after the discovery of many other asteroids, so, it was argued, Pluto should be reclassified as one of the Kuiper belt objects.
On July 29, 2005, the discovery of a new Trans-Neptunian object was announced. Named Eris, it is now known to be approximately the same size as Pluto. This was the largest object discovered in the Solar System since Triton in 1846. Its discoverers and the press initially called it the tenth planet, although there was no official consensus at the time on whether to call it a planet. Others in the astronomical community considered the discovery the strongest argument for reclassifying Pluto as a minor planet.
The debate came to a head in 2006 with an IAU resolution that created an official definition for the term "planet". According to this resolution, there are three main conditions for an object to be considered a 'planet':
# The object must be in orbit around the Sun.
# The object must be massive enough to be a sphere by its own gravitational force. More specifically, its own gravity should pull it into a shape of hydrostatic equilibrium.
# It must have cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
Pluto fails to meet the third condition, since its mass is only 0.07 times that of the mass of the other objects in its orbit (Earth's mass, by contrast, is 1.7 million times the remaining mass in its own orbit). The IAU further resolved that Pluto be classified in the simultaneously created dwarf planet category, and that it act as the prototype for the plutoid category of trans-Neptunian objects, in which it would be separately, but concurrently, classified.
On September 13, 2006, the IAU included Pluto, Eris, and the Eridian moon Dysnomia in their Minor Planet Catalogue, giving them the official minor planet designations "(134340) Pluto", "(136199) Eris", and "(136199) Eris I Dysnomia". If Pluto had been given a minor planet name upon its discovery, the number would have been about 1,164 rather than 134,340.
There has been some resistance within the astronomical community toward the reclassification. Alan Stern, principal investigator with NASA's ''New Horizons'' mission to Pluto, has publicly derided the IAU resolution, stating that "the definition stinks, for technical reasons." Stern's contention is that by the terms of the new definition Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune, all of which share their orbits with asteroids, would be excluded. His other claim is that because less than five percent of astronomers voted for it, the decision was not representative of the entire astronomical community. Marc W. Buie of the Lowell observatory has voiced his opinion on the new definition on his website and is one of the petitioners against the definition. Others have supported the IAU. Mike Brown, the astronomer who discovered Eris, said "through this whole crazy circus-like procedure, somehow the right answer was stumbled on. It’s been a long time coming. Science is self-correcting eventually, even when strong emotions are involved."
Researchers on both sides of the debate gathered on August 14–16, 2008, at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory for a conference that included back-to-back talks on the current IAU definition of a planet. Entitled "The Great Planet Debate", the conference published a post-conference press release indicating that scientists could not come to a consensus about the definition of a planet. Just before the conference, on June 11, 2008, the IAU announced in a press release that the term "plutoid" would henceforth be used to describe Pluto and other objects similar to Pluto which have an orbital semimajor axis greater than that of Neptune and enough mass to be of near-spherical shape.
}}
Pluto Profile at NASA's Solar System Exploration site
NASA Pluto factsheet
Website of the observatory that discovered Pluto
Category:Astronomical objects discovered in 1930
af:Pluto (dwergplaneet)
als:(134340) Pluto
ang:Pluto
ar:بلوتو
an:Plutón (astronomía)
frp:Pluton (planèta nana)
as:প্লুটো
ast:Plutón (planeta nanu)
az:Pluton (cırtdan planet)
bn:প্লুটো
zh-min-nan:Mê-ông-chheⁿ
map-bms:Pluto
be:Карлікавая планета Плутон
be-x-old:Плютон (карлікавая плянэта)
bg:Плутон (планета джудже)
bar:Pluto (Zweagplanet)
bs:Pluton
br:Ploudon (planedenn-gorr)
ca:Plutó (planeta nan)
cs:Pluto (trpasličí planeta)
cy:Plwton (planed gorrach)
da:Pluto (dværgplanet)
de:Pluto
nv:Tłóotoo
et:Pluuto
el:Πλούτωνας (πλανήτης νάνος)
eml:Plutån
es:Plutón (planeta enano)
eo:Plutono
eu:Pluton (planeta nanoa)
fa:پلوتو
fo:Pluto
fr:Pluton (planète naine)
fy:Pluto
ga:Plútón (abhacphláinéad)
gv:Pluto
gd:Pliùtò
gl:Plutón
gu:પ્લૂટો (ગ્રહ)
ko:명왕성
hy:Պլուտոն
hi:यम (बौना ग्रह)
hr:134340 Pluton
io:Plutono
ilo:Pluto
id:Pluto
ia:Pluton (planeta nano)
iu:ᑉᓘᑐ
os:Плутон (чысыл планетæ)
zu:UPluto
is:Plútó (dvergreikistjarna)
it:Plutone (astronomia)
he:פלוטו
jv:Pluto
kn:ಪ್ಲುಟೊ
pam:Pluto
ka:პლუტონი (ჯუჯა პლანეტა)
csb:Pluton
kk:Плутон (шағын ғаламшар)
kw:Plouton (planet korr)
sw:Pluto
kv:Плутон
ht:Pliton
ku:Pluton (gerstêrk)
ky:Плутон
lez:Плутон
la:Pluto (planetulus)
lv:Plutons (pundurplanēta)
lb:(134340) Pluto
lt:Plutonas (nykštukinė planeta)
lij:Pluton (astrònomia)
li:Pluto (dwergplaneet)
jbo:pluton
hu:Pluto (törpebolygó)
mk:Плутон (џуџеста планета)
ml:പ്ലൂട്ടോ
mr:प्लूटो (बटु ग्रह)
xmf:პლუტონი
mzn:پلوتو
ms:Pluto
mwl:Pluton
mdf:Плутон (шары тяште)
mn:Дэлхийн ван
my:ပလူတို
nah:Mictlāntēuccītlalli
nl:Pluto (dwergplaneet)
new:प्लुटो
ja:冥王星
no:Pluto
nn:134340 Pluto
nov:Pluto (planete)
oc:Pluton (planeta nana)
mhr:Плутон
or:ପ୍ଲୁଟୋ
km:ភ្លុយតុង
nds:Pluto (Dwargplanet)
pl:134340 Pluton
pt:Plutão
ksh:Pluuto (Zwerchplaneet)
ro:Pluton
rm:Pluto (planet nanin)
qu:Plutun (tuna puriq quyllur)
ru:Плутон
stq:Pluto
sq:Plutoni (planeti)
scn:Plutoni
si:ප්ලූටෝ
simple:Pluto
sk:134340 Pluto
sl:Pluton
so:Buluuto
ckb:پلوتۆ
sr:Плутон (патуљаста планета)
sh:Pluton (astronomija)
su:Pluto
fi:Pluto (kääpiöplaneetta)
sv:Pluto
tl:Pluton (astronomiya)
ta:புளூட்டோ
tt:Плутон (планета)
te:ప్లూటో
th:ดาวพลูโต
tg:Плутон
chr:ᏡᏙ
tr:Plüton
uk:Плутон (карликова планета)
ur:پلوٹو
ug:پلۇتون
vec:Pluton (astronomia)
vi:Sao Diêm Vương
fiu-vro:Pluuto
zh-classical:冥王星
war:Pluton
wo:Pluton
yi:פלוטאן
yo:Pluto
zh-yue:冥王星
diq:Pluton
zh:冥王星