Rss Feed Tweeter button

Archives

God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Stephen C. Meyer

It’s not like it needed any extra confirmation, really, but further evidence that the Seattle-based intelligent design think-tank that is the Discovery Institute is actually a stealth traditional creationist organisation is about to be dropped in August, in the form of a new book. “Science and Human Origins” by Discovery Institute regulars Ann Gauger, Douglas Axe and Casey Luskin (and from Discovery Institute Press), according to the book description on Amazon, is set to “…challenge the claim that undirected natural selection is capable of building a human being, critically assess fossil and genetic evidence that human beings share a common ancestor with apes, and debunk recent claims that the human race could not have started from an original couple.”

Wow. They couldn’t mean… Adam and Eve, could they?

Of course they do. A recent pre-publication review by Spectrum Magazine, a Seventh-day Adventist journal, makes clear what is otherwise actually rather obvious:

Chapter three talks about human origins and the fossil record and Chapter 5 discusses whether population genetics proves that there could not have been a literal Adam and Eve (only two humans) at some point in time.

It’s strange, you know, because intelligent design, a supposedly secular, scientific hypothesis, doesn’t have anything to do with confirming the Biblical narrative of humanity springing from the necessarily incestuous beginnings that is Adam and Eve. (Think of the inbreeding coefficients! Boggles the mind.) So why is the Discovery Institute publishing books defending it? I’m not sure what excuse Luskin et al. have up their sleeves, but it doesn’t really matter now, does it? The damage is done.

Then again, scientists and ID critics have known for years that the Discovery Institute is more than a little religiously charged. The Wedge Document, the ubiquitous association of ID proponents and theological institutions and conferences, their non-stop attacks on materialism, naturalism and atheism – the list goes on – are out there for all to see.

Even in a less-than-ideal world, this should be the nail in the coffin, but this coffin is now more metal than wood and the corpse inside just won’t stop shouting.

Episode 47 of The Pseudo Scientists: Ultra-conserved genomic elements, mysterious cosmic radiation, and Christian billboard hilarity

The Pseudo Scientists – Episode 47

In this episode of The Pseudo Scientists, the official podcast of the Young Australian Skeptics, Jason, Richard and I discuss a mysterious burst of cosmic radiation in the 8th century, the genetics of ultra-conserved elements in animal and plant genomes, and a billboard campaign arguing against Richard Dawkins. Plus, Jason has some unfortunate news…

This week’s “Houston, We Have A Problem” clip is a lesson in “seeing energy”. Don’t hurt your eyes, guys, I hear it can be quite powerful.

If you’d like to express an interest in writing for the revamped YAS blog in late July, as we mention at the end of the show, let us know via our Contact page or send us an email: youngausskeptics(at)gmail(dot)com.

What are you waiting for? Listen in the audio player above, subscribe via iTunes or Libsyn RSS, become a fan on Facebook, and follow the Young Australian Skeptics on Twitter.

“I’m not a speciesist, but…” – my new Nature Education post on why humans are terribly boring

It’s been a little while since I’ve had one of these published, but it’s good to be back! My latest Nature Education’s Student Voices blog post is up, and it’s on a topic both close and far from my heart: humanity. More specifically, it’s about how boring, biologically, Homo sapiens is as a species compared with the vast array of fascinating creatures that we mostly ignore every day, and if we would just take a second to appreciate them, we might stop putting ourselves up on a pedestal.

Here’s a little taste:

Whales taunt us from the sea in bodies forced into streamlined forms, and some of them even do so from up to 3 kilometres below the surface of the ocean. And teetering on the edge of mammalian classification, platypuses have ten sex chromosomes (our two pale in comparison), and males have spurs that deliver a shot of venom to anyone or anything that gets too close. The best we humans can muster is a mildly irritating scratch from our fingernails or a moderately annoying bite from our flimsy jaws. Yes, that hyena over there, with its ability to crush bones, is laughing at you, and rightly so. You look ridiculous trying to eat that steak.

Episode 46 of The Pseudo Scientists: Square Kilometre Array telescopes, Murray-Darling Basin river troubles, and successful private space docking

The Pseudo Scientists – Episode 46

In this episode of The Pseudo Scientists, the official podcast of the Young Australian Skeptics, I host a discussion with Belinda, James and Richard about the Australian and South African Square Kilometre Array telescopes, problems with a plan to help save the Murray-Darling river basin in eastern Australia, and the successful launch and docking to the International Space Station of a pioneering commercial space capsule, SpaceX’s Dragon.

This week’s “Houston, We Have A Problem” clip is William Lane Craig saying some silly things about Christian apologetics. Methinks Craig knows little about evolutionary biology.

If you’d like to express an interest in writing for the revamped YAS blog in late July, as we mention at the end of the show, let us know via our Contact page or send us an email: youngausskeptics(at)gmail(dot)com.

What are you waiting for? Listen in the audio player above, subscribe via iTunes or Libsyn RSS, become a fan on Facebook, and follow the Young Australian Skeptics on Twitter.

Is Doctor Who is a good substitute for science blogging?

The answer to the above question is… er… “probably not”. But they’re both great, don’t make me choose between them. Then again, I may have to placate you all with some Doctor Who-related things, given that I’ve been quite busy at university lately with assessments, and subsequently I haven’t had enough time to finish the posts I’m writing on convergent molecular evolution (in response to this ENV post by ID proponent Jonathan McLatchie) and the relationship between evolutionary biology and atheism (in response to various posts by science and atheism bloggers on the topic in recent weeks). Apologies.

So what’s this about Doctor Who? Ah yes. I’m a huge Who fan (more fandomly-inclined individuals would call me a Whovian), so I jumped at the recent opportunity to (again) record a couple of episodes of the TBA podcast with über-geek and personal hero Paul Verhoeven and hilarious host Ben Vernel on the topic of the world’s longest running science fiction television show. I could (and did) talk about it for hours.

In the first episode, “Doctor Who: A Beginner’s Guide”, we discuss the basics of the show, why you should start watching it in the first place, and what some good jumping-in points are along its near-50 year history. In the second episode, “Doctor Who: An Advanced Guide”, we discuss SPOILERS, the Big Finish audio plays, and our favourite moments/episodes/Doctors.

You can subscribe to TBA on iTunes.

“Test of Faith” science vs. religion panel discussion audio finally available!

The Pseudo Scientists – Test of Faith Panel

On the 16th of April, I took part in a panel discussion with two fellow atheists and three Christian scientists on the topic of the compatibility of science and religious belief, entitled “Test of Faith”, as a part of the Reason for Faith Festival in Melbourne. Well, finally, I’ve been able to release the audio of the event as an episode of The Pseudo Scientists podcast. It’s been lightly edited for coherency and microphone levels, but it’s otherwise untouched – apart from the brief intro and outro segments I recorded with fellow podcaster Belinda Nicholson, in which I clarify a few points made in the discussion.

Enjoy!

You can subscribe to The Pseudo Scientists via iTunes or Libsyn RSS. Become a fan on Facebook, and follow the Young Australian Skeptics on Twitter!

Episode 45 of The Pseudo Scientists: The “Real” Australian Sceptics, anti-intellectualism, and international emails

The Pseudo Scientists – Episode 45

In this episode of The Pseudo Scientists, the official podcast of the Young Australian Skeptics, Belinda, James and Richard discuss the Real Australian Sceptics and Australian anti-intellectualism, and read out some listener emails from California, New Zealand and Finland. Plus, I get mentioned! Because I have a funny accent. No other reason.

This week’s “Houston, We Have A Problem” clip is a sample of the enlightened views of Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson. Listen to the full 12 minute clip, if you can bear it. It’s pretty sickening.

Oh, and we have a new contact email address for the show: youngausskeptics(at)gmail(dot)com. Drop us a line if you have feedback, questions, praise, criticism, or spoilers for upcoming television show episodes1.

What are you waiting for? Listen in the audio player above, subscribe via iTunes or Libsyn RSS, become a fan on Facebook, and follow the Young Australian Skeptics on Twitter.

- - - - - - - - -
  1. Note: If anyone actually does the latter, bad things will happen.

Tabletop Transitional – An introduction to Björk

Since I’m floundering about what I should write about next in terms of science or philosophy (I was tossing up about the definition of “function” in biology, but the literature is far too dense for me to get through), I thought I would share another insight into the world of my favourite music. Last time it was the violin-plucking indie rocker Andrew Bird, and this time it’s Björk, everyone’s favourite Icelandic icon.

Now I fully admit that Björk can be hard to get into. Friends of mine are quite familiar with my “Björk journey”, in which it took me four full listens of her entire discography in order to start to realise that the music was actually good. In fact, I was listening to her 2004 album Medúlla for the first time a couple of years back, before one of my sister’s choir concerts (quite appropriate, actually), just sitting in the car thinking “What the hell am I listening to? This is actually really scary – and not in a good way.” That thought didn’t go away until a few weeks later – for some reason, it all started to make sense.

What I’m saying is: don’t expect to like her music when you first listen to it. I’ll try and select some more accessible tracks for you here, but even these might be taxing for people not used to listening to music outside their comfort zone. Listener beware.

So, characteristics of the music itself. Björk’s style is hard to define, as she often switches between genres within albums, and each song rarely contains elements from only one genre. The only real constant is her vocals, which really ground each track and remind you, as you listen to her discography, that it’s all coming from one person – this is all her music. I suppose another characteristic is dense instrumentation and layering, although that’s not true for all her tracks.

I could take you right now on a journey through each of her albums, starting with her 1993 debut Debut (haha, Björk, haha) and ending with her latest, Biophilia, but there are just too many albums to get through, so I’ll only share four songs (far too few, I know) – a selection of my favourites that I’m relatively certain most people won’t find repulsive on a first listen. But, of course, your mileage may vary.

Let’s still do it chronologically (in terms of composition) though, shall we?

» Continue reading “Tabletop Transitional – An introduction to Björk” «

Episode 44 of The Pseudo Scientists: Eggless chickens, science vs. religion, and Eugenie Scott

The Pseudo Scientists – Episode 44

In this episode of The Pseudo Scientists, the official podcast of the Young Australian Skeptics, Richard, Belinda and I discuss eggless chickens, analytical thought and its effects on supernatural beliefs, and the compatibility of science and religion. Plus, Belinda interviews Eugenie Scott from the National Center for Science Education about recent developments in anti-evolution legislation in the US. This marks the third time Eugenie has been interviewed on the podcast – which means that 6.8% of all the “proper” episodes contain an interview with her. You can’t say she doesn’t deserve such attention though, come on.

This week’s “Houston, We Have A Problem” clip is from a trailer for the evangelical Christian movie “IndoctriNation”, featuring Answers in Genesis’s Ken Ham. Don’t you just love him?

You can find out more about the National Center for Science Education at their website.

What are you waiting for? Listen in the audio player above, subscribe via iTunes or Libsyn RSS, and become a fan on Facebook.

Episode 43 of The Pseudo Scientists: Global Atheist Convention 2012 with special guest Ashley Paramore

The Pseudo Scientists – Episode 43

In this episode of The Pseudo Scientists, the official podcast of the Young Australian Skeptics, Belinda, James, Jason, Richard and I – along with special guest Ashley Paramore from the Secular Student Alliance – discuss the Global Atheist Convention 2012, as well as secular/atheist student groups and Ashley’s time in Australia.

This week’s “Houston, We Have A Problem” clip is from the official trailer of the chemtrail conspiracy movie “Why in the World are They Spraying?”. Fairly insane.

You can find Ashley Paramore on Twitter, YouTube and the Secular Student Alliance website.

What are you waiting for? Listen in the audio player above, subscribe via iTunes or Libsyn RSS, and become a fan on Facebook.