Earlier this month, Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) founded the House Energy Action Team (HEAT), a "committed group of House members" dedicated to "promot[ing] Republican energy policies." Thirty-four members of Congress were recruited to the cause, dedicating their district work period to "promoting energy independence for America." As McCarthy's press office put it, the dedicated members of the HEAT squad would "clearly demonstrate that House Republicans are on the side of the small businesses and families."

Judging from their campaign coffers, however, reasonable citizens might question who these members are really fighting for. Members of HEAT have already received nearly $1.3 million in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry in the 2012 election cycle alone (according to a Political Correction records search on OpenSecrets.org of each individual HEAT member, excluding contributions from individuals). The average amount received per member comes in at about $38,232; HEAT leader Rep. McCarthy alone has received over $114,000.

Thursday, Rep. Bill Flores (R-TX), a member of HEAT and former oil executive, toured a hydraulic fracturing site and released a statement:

Flores toured the Enervest site as a part of the nationwide House Energy Action Team 2012 American Energy and Jobs Tour. The point of the tours is to "highlight America's domestic energy resources and the need to increase domestic production."

"Burdensome Washington bureaucrat regulations and high energy costs are causing a roadblock to economic recovery and job creation," Flores said in a release. "We can clear this roadblock by increase our domestic energy production and decreasing our reliance on unstable Middle East oil. Yet, many folks in Washington view our domestic energy resources as a liability; and they continue to dream up ways to lock-up, restrict, tax, or otherwise regulate these assets away from the American people." [...]

"The oil and gas industry is vital to our economy and hydraulic fracturing is an integral tool to increase domestic energy production," Flores said. "I am working with my colleagues in Congress to ensure that Americans are able to take advantage of one of our great natural resources we have in Texas that provides well-paying jobs, improved tax bases for Texas school districts, and lower energy prices. In [a] nutshell, if we want to have American energy security, we need to develop a smart, stable and transparent regulatory scheme for hydraulic fracturing."

According to OpenSecrets.org, the "oil and gas industry" is the number one donor to Flores's 2012 campaign. In addition to money from energy industry PACs, he's received thousands of dollars this election cycle from James C. Flores, an executive at Plains Exploration and Production (PXP). PXP was in the news in recent weeks after it began fracking in southern California's Baldwin Hills Oil Field, a move that allegedly broke promises to nearby communities concerned about the safety of the process.

HEAT members are currently touring the nation's oil fields and energy companies. They're tweeting up a storm about the need for an "all-of-the-above energy solution," but they ignore green energy, the public health risks of drilling practices like fracking, and the economic realities of expanded domestic drilling (hint: it won't drive down gas prices). And none of them disclose the tens of thousands of dollars they're receiving from oil and gas companies. In other words, it's just a lot of hot air.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) likes to reject most things that come from the federal government. In the latest rejection of federal funds, his administration has rejected almost $200 million in bonuses that would have gone to health care for children. As Health News Florida points out:

Over the past two years, Florida did such a good job of enrolling uninsured children in KidCare that the state could have qualified for as much as $200 million in federal bonuses - money that could have helped get more children into care.

But the state did not take the steps required to get the money. A spokesman for the Florida House said it appears the reason was the cost involved in making changes to certain agency rules, but was unable to offer specifics Friday morning.

While Scott has made it clear that he won't accept the millions of dollars in funding under the Affordable Care Act legislation, this money does not come from ACA but rather from the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA). CHIPRA has already benefited 1.1 million children above expected levels. As the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families explains:

Data on the bonuses show that in the 23 states that received bonuses in FY 2011, an additional 1.1 million kids were enrolled above expected levels. The most (123,000) can be found in the state of Ohio. While we can't say that the bonuses fully explain this jump in enrollment, it would certainly be fair to say that they get some of the credit for supporting states in reaching these kids.

One could only imagine the impact it would have on Florida because as Think Progress notes, "Currently, 687,300 or 16 percent of children are uninsured in Florida — six percentage points higher than the national average."

Tomorrow the United States Supreme Court will hold hearings in Arizona v. United States on their way to deciding the fate of Arizona's controversial immigration enforcement law, SB 1070 (and by extension the fate of the many copycat versions that have passed around the country — most notably in Alabama and Georgia). Since this legislation's introduction and subsequent passage, it has been a point of controversy not just in Arizona, but throughout the country.

Defenders of the law claim that SB 1070 is necessary to stop crime in Arizona, but crime had been falling across the United States overall, including in Arizona, prior to the law's passage. Even Jan Brewer, Arizona's governor admitted that the law "doesn't have anything to do with border security." In fact, despite rampant crime on the Mexican side of the border, in both 2010 when SB 1070 was passed and again in 2011, border towns were some of the safest cities in America.

Proponents of the law also claim that it merely mirrors existing federal law and therefore they are helping the federal government do their job. However, as FactCheck.org pointed out, the law "does more than merely mirror federal law" and actually potentially allows for racial profiling. The laws lead sponsor, the recently recalled Senate Majority Leader Russell Pearce, has compared immigrants to a "cow with mad cow disease" and held an immigration policy summit where he questioned whether or not President Obama is "illegal." After the law's passage, Pearce claimed the immigration system wasn't broken and said that he wanted to send the message that "illegal immigrants" are "not welcome in Arizona."

Unlike Pearce, whose approval decreased after the law's passage, the law's author, current Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, benefitted from an elevated national profile. Kobach has helped author several anti-immigrant laws across the country, most notably the precursors to SB 1070 in Hazelton, PA and Fremont, NE, while racking up $6.6 million in fees. For his work with SB 1070 alone, he received $13,000 in fees. Kobach has had a history of anti-immigrant rhetoric, and previously worked for the Immigration Reform Law Institute — the legal arm of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) a Southern Poverty Law Center-labeled hate group. GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney even made him an advisor on his campaign until controversy over Kobach's polarizing views on immigration recently forced Romney to attempt to disassociate himself with Kobach.

SB 1070 brought national attention to immigration enforcement in Arizona, a conversation that has empowered and showcased two notorious proponents of the bill -- Arizona sheriffs Joe Arpaio and Paul Babeu. Sheriff Arpaio, who is also known for the extreme treatment of his prisoners in Maricopa County, is facing a corruption scandal and a civil rights investigation by the Justice Department. Recently, it was exposed that he botched more than 400 sex crime investigations, "including dozens of alleged child molestations."

Babeu, who has used his fame to run for the House of Representatives in Arizona, also has a history of anti-immigrant behavior. In 2010 Babeu appeared on the "pro-white" radio show Political Cesspool and The Alex Jones Show, which is hosted by 9-11 truther and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. In 2011, he was the keynote speaker at FAIR's "Hold Their Feet To The Fire" conference which seeks to advance reforms "that relieve many of the burdens that mass immigration — legal and illegal — imposes on the American people."

Given the continued push nationwide to enact similar legislation, Americans should be aware that the implications of this case go far beyond the Arizona state lines.

Earlier today on Laura Ingraham's radio show, Rep. Allen West (R-FL) commented on his colleague Rep. Bobby Rush's (D-IL) decision to don a hooded sweatshirt and sunglasses while making a floor speech about the Trayvon Martin shooting. From The Hill:

West said the incident might be funny now, but he speculated that at the time, Capitol Police were likely concerned.

"Initially, they did not know who it was and they were concerned that someone had just walked off of the street or kind of had broken away from a tour group," West said on conservative Laura Ingraham's radio show.

"Look, this is the type of immature gimmickry we see coming from the other side that you know, does not have any place, especially on the House floor and really in the United States," he continued.

Clearly, West wasn't concerned with what Rush actually did or the message Rush was trying to convey. As The Hill pointed out, Rush took off a suit jacket that he wore onto the house floor prior to pulling the hoodie, which was under his jacket, onto his head. (Rush was giving a floor speech condemning the remarks of Fox News' Geraldo Rivera, who claimed  that wearing "the hoodie" played a part in Trayvon's death.) Despite West's criticisms of "the other side," it's Republican Rep. Don Young (AK) who definitely takes the "gimmickry" cake.

Last year during a committee hearing, Rep. Young wore a propeller beanie with the Obama campaign logo on it and the words "Obama's energy plan," in an obvious attempt to mock the President's energy strategy.

While the two incidents are clearly different (for many reasons), it shows that when it comes to Democrats, Rep. West will attack them for almost anything — even for protesting a situation that he himself called "an outrage" last week.

Five years ago, Zuhdi Jasser was just a physician and self-proclaimed Muslim leader who used regular appearances on Glenn Beck's television and radio shows to criticize the supposed "Islamist" leanings of leading American Muslim groups. Now, thanks to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, he's the newest Commissioner on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom:

The U.S. Congress has appointed two individuals, Dr. Robert P. George and Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, to serve as Commissioners on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF).

Comprised of nine commissioners, USCIRF monitors and advocates for religious freedom abroad wherever that right is being abused.  USCIRF also offers policy solutions to improve conditions at the critical juncture of foreign policy, national security, and international religious freedom standards. On March 20, the Commission issued its 2012 annual report which recommended to the Secretary of State that the Obama administration designate 16 nations as countries of particular concern under the International Religious Freedom Act.

Dr. George was appointed by The Speaker of the House John Boehner. Dr. Jasser was appointed by the Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. 

Jasser gained prominence thanks to Rep. Peter King (R-NY), the House Homeland Security Committee chairman who, in spite of Jasser's lack of both experience in the law enforcement field and followers in the Muslim community, selected him as a witness for the first of the committee's hearings on "the extent of radicalization in the American Muslim community and that community's response."

A year ago we wrote of Jasser:

With no relevant credentials to speak of, Jasser's authority in conservative circles as an "expert on radical Islam" seems to be derived from his willingness to frequently attack the Obama administration (whose terrorism advisor Jasser says "deserves honorary membership in the Muslim Brotherhood") and Muslim-American civil rights groups ("front organizations" for the Muslim Brotherhood, according to Jasser).

[...]

Given these facts, it should be no surprise that Fox News' Glenn Beck has dubbed him the "one Muslim that we were all searching for after 9-11" and said he is "a voice that I trust." Jasser has appeared on Beck's show to provide "expert" validation of Beck's zany apocalyptic conspiracies in the wake of recent unrest in the Middle East.

The Center for American Progress has also highlighted Jasser's background and work, describing him as a "leading light of the Islamophobia network" and "the validator for Islamophobic propaganda."

In spite of those deficiencies, McConnell apparently thinks Jasser is the best qualified individual to serve on a commission whose mandate is the spread of religious liberty.

Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law has become the subject of increasing scrutiny after the Sanford police cited the statute in their explanation of why they did not arrest George Zimmerman following his fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman's lawyer has also indicated that "Stand Your Ground" would likely be part of his defense against potential charges.

State legislators that backed the bill and a major gun lobby ally have begun claiming that Zimmerman's actions aren't covered by "Stand Your Ground." A central part of that claim is that "Stand Your Ground" doesn't cover Zimmerman because he pursued Martin. Writing at Foxnews.com, state Rep. Dennis Baxley, the author of Florida's "Stand Your Ground" legislation, argued:

Former Florida Sen. Durell Peaden echoed the sentiment saying, "There's nothing in the Florida law that allows him to follow someone with a d*** gun." On Hardball With Chris Matthews, the Second Amendment Foundation's Alan Gottlieb suggested "Stand Your Ground" didn't apply, saying Zimmerman "was the pursuer" and that "when you're pursuing you're not standing your ground."

Despite their protestations, a recent Florida case shows that Zimmerman's self-defense claim isn't the first time someone has pursued a person they later killed and then cited "Stand Your Ground" to avoid prosecution.

According to a report in the Miami Herald, Greyston Garcia pursued a car burglar attempting to steal his car's radio more than a block before stabbing him to death, an event captured by a video recording. Last Wednesday the judge threw out murder charges against Garcia citing Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law. Prosecutors unsuccessfully argued that Garcia "no longer needed to use deadly force to protect his home or unoccupied vehicle. "

Read the full entry ...

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments challenging President Obama's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Almost immediately upon passage, Florida (via Attorney General Bill McCollum) spearheaded a lawsuit against the act (subsequently joined by several other states), which has now reached the nation's highest court. At the same time Florida was filing its paperwork against the ACA, the Republican leadership in Florida began its case in the court of public opinion by fear-mongering about the law with misrepresentations, omissions and hyperbolic vitriol.

Some of the most ludicrous attacks have come from Florida Gov. Rick Scott, who has been in full denial mode. Initially, he publicly denied that the ACA was the "law of the land," despite having been passed by Congress and signed by the president. Lately, he's chosen to deny federal aid to the people of Florida. Scott has managed to shun hundreds of millions of dollars in PPACA grants that would, among other things, bump up Medicaid payments to primary care physicians and directly benefit Floridians right now.

Other Florida Republicans have followed Scott's lead. Some examples include Sen. Marco Rubio, who claimed "Obamacare" has been "detrimental to our economy;" Longtime Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, who alleged the ACA "raids half a trillion dollars from Medicare, jeopardizing seniors' access to the care they need and deserve;" Rep. Gus Bilirakis, who characterized the law as a "job-killing takeover of our healthcare system," and Tea Party darling Rep. Allen West, who has declared the law an "unconstitutional, anti-constitutional and, most certainly, an awful piece of American policy" that is "destined to fail."

Unfortunately for the GOP cause, the harsh rhetoric of the Florida Republicans doesn't match the reality on the ground in their state. Even though the ACA's full rollout is still some years down the road, many of its provisions have already had a big impact on Florida citizens. The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) has published some noteworthy statistics that the GOP in the sunshine state failed to mention. Here are a few:

Health plans are now required to allow parents to keep their children under age 26 without job-based coverage on their family's coverage, and, thanks to this provision, 2.5 million young people have gained coverage nationwide. As of June 2011, 157,185 young adults in Florida gained insurance coverage as a result of the new health care law. [Healthcare.gov, accessed 3/22/12, emphasis added]

• Cancer Patients And Others With Chronic Diseases Are No Longer Burdened By Lifetime Caps On Coverage. From HHS:

The law bans insurance companies from imposing lifetime dollar limits on health benefits - freeing cancer patients and individuals suffering from other chronic diseases from having to worry about going without treatment because of their lifetime limits. Already, 5,587,000 residents, including 2,170,000 women and 1,411,000 children, are free from worrying about lifetime limits on coverage. The law also restricts the use of annual limits and bans them completely in 2014. [Healthcare.gov, accessed 3/22/12]

• Thousands Of Floridians With Pre-Existing Conditions Now Have Options For Health Insurance Coverage. From HHS:

As of the end of 2011, 3,736 previously uninsured residents of Florida who were locked out of the coverage system because of a pre-existing condition are now insured through a new Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan that was created under the new health reform law. [Healthcare.gov, accessed 3/22/12]

This morning a group of 15 survivors of last year's attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ)  published an op-ed in the Arizona Daily Star calling on President Obama to "get moving" on the effort to close loopholes in the background check system for gun purchases. The letter marks the one year anniversary President Obama's own op-ed in the Daily Star encouraging people to "seek agreement on gun reforms."

Currently millions of guns are purchased each year without background checks because the private seller loophole allows people to sell firearms without them if they are not federally licensed gun dealers. It's been shown that sellers at gun shows and online will sell guns even to people that say they probably couldn't pass a background check. Additionally the background check system is missing millions of records of severely mental ill people that are legally prohibited from purchasing guns.

President Obama discussed reforming the background check system in his editorial, but as today's letter notes little progress has been made towards reforms:

We are resolved to work together to fix our background check system - to protect others from the terrible violence that our community has endured.

Last November, we traveled to Washington, D.C., to advocate for the Fix Gun Checks Act, legislation that would make sure that the records of prohibited gun purchasers are in the gun background-check system, and require a background check for every gun sale. (See www.fixgunchecks.org online.)

We personally met with some of our elected representatives about specific steps to fix the system and help prevent senseless shootings.

We believed we had the president as an ally in that effort. We were encouraged last March when he said, "We should provide an instant, accurate, comprehensive and consistent system for background checks to sellers who want to do the right thing, and make sure that criminals can't escape it."

Some might argue that, because it's an election year, now is not the time to act. And to those people we say: This is a common-sense proposal that the American people overwhelmingly support.

As noted in the letter, reforming the background check system for purchasing guns is a broadly popular idea.

In a recent Des Moines Register op-ed, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) misdiagnoses a principal cause of the nation's economic struggles ("frivolous lawsuits") and offers a supposed cure, the Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act (LARA), which could have side effects worse than any theoretical good it might do. The threat of lawsuits is not holding back the economy, as polls show that small businesses rank potential lawsuits near the bottom of their list of concerns regarding the economic outlook. Furthermore, judges have made clear that rules currently in place streamline litigation and give them the tools they need to deter meritless lawsuits more effectively than LARA would.

In the op-ed, "Put Brakes on Frivolous Lawsuits," Senator Grassley writes that "billions of dollars are wasted on frivolous lawsuits that siphon money away from job creation. Frivolous claims also clog an already burdened legal system and delay the resolution of lawsuits that have merit."

But when pollsters ask business people what their problems are, they give a different answer. Polls conducted on behalf of business organizations demonstrate that potential lawsuits are a minor-at-best concern. Only five percent of small businesses said "litigation" was the issue posing the greatest threat to their business in a 2011 Small Business Outlook Survey produced for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce by Harris Interactive. The option "none of these," chosen by 18 percent of respondents, was far ahead of litigation. A similar poll of U.S. Chamber small business members released in January 2012 produced almost the same result, with only six percent of respondents identifying litigation as the biggest issue facing them. In addition, small business owners ranked "costs and frequency of lawsuits/threatened suits" near the bottom (65th out of 75 possible choices) in a 2008 National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) survey that ranked the biggest threats facing small business owners. In the face of this polling by the Chamber of Commerce and NFIB, LARA seems to be a solution in search of a problem.

But is LARA really a solution at all? Judges - the people with the greatest incentive to see truly frivolous lawsuits eliminated, while suits with merit go forward - think that it would do more harm than good. The Judicial Conference's Committee on the Rules of Practice and Procedure, the body charged by the federal judiciary with monitoring and advising on the procedural rules that govern the courts, opposes LARA. It does so because the bill would return the procedural rules for the federal courts (specifically Rule 11, which deals with sanctions for frivolous conduct) to an earlier version of the rule that existed before reforms were put in place in 1993. Federal judges, having lived under both versions of Rule 11, want to keep the reforms in place, and not turn back the clock to the pre-reform era as LARA would do.

A summary of The Committee on the Rules of Practice and Procedure's analysis of LARA is below the fold.

Read the full entry ...

On his Twitter feed this afternoon, Washington Times columnist and National Rifle Association board member Ted Nugent announced that after "a long heart&soul conversation" with Mitt Romney today, he has decided to endorse the former Massachusetts governor.

In apparently seeking out the endorsement of Nugent, Romney has linked himself to a man with a long record of inflammatory and offensive comments.

Notably, during an August 21, 2007, concert, while brandishing what appeared to be two assault rifles, Nugent said, "hey Obama, you might want to suck on one of these, you punk," adding, "hey Obama, he's a piece of shit, I told him to suck on my machine gun." He went on to say that while he was in New York, "I said, 'hey Hillary [Clinton], you might want to ride one of these into the sunset, you worthless bitch."

Nugent has also called Clinton a "two-bit whore," referred to the Muslim community as "rude and stupid," said "[i]f it was up to me, if you uttered the word 'gun control,' we'd put you in jail," and called the Democratic Party the "modern-day slave master" to low-income Americans.

The NRA will be featuring Nugent in their voter registration campaign. The group has yet to endorse in the Republican primary, but executive vice president Wayne LaPierre has said that they are "all in" with regard to defeating President Obama in what LaPierre called "the most dangerous election of our lifetimes."