When an Atheist Parent Introduces Her Child to Jesus for the First Time…

Atheist comedian Julia Sweeney (Letting Go of God) recently watched the movie Jesus Christ Superstar with her daughter Mulan.

Julia Sweeney and Mulan (center) with the hosts of the Humanist Network News Podcast

Since Mulan wasn’t raised with religious beliefs, a lot of the story was brand new to her…:

Mulan and I watched it. I thought maybe it was a good way for her to learn about Jesus. HA. She was so bewildered. I realized that since she hasn’t been inculcated with religious behaviors, everything just seems weird to her. Things I would have never had the naive open-mindedness to even ask. For example, at one point she asked me, “Why do those sick people want to touch Jesus?” I said, “Because they think he’s magic and can heal them.” Mulan said, “Why would anyone think that?” Me: “Because they didn’t have very much scientific information.” Mulan: “That’s crazy.” Then I had to stop the film and tell her that lots of people in the world still believe things like that.

Later she asked, “Why are all those women putting oil on Jesus’ head, and sort of leaning on him like that?” I said, “Well, one — Mary Magdalene, is like Jesus’ girlfriend. The other women — well, when you’re a cult leader, or actually this can be true of any very high status man — women fawn all over you.” “Creepy.” Mulan said. Then she fell asleep and I didn’t wake her up.

If they weren’t so used to their own mythology, you have to figure Christians would completely dismiss the idea of a talking snake, a woman being created from the rib of a man, and a guy rising from the dead…

Have any of you had similar teaching experiences with your children?

Why I Identify as a Skeptic

My friend Sarah Moglia has written an essay, titled Why I Don't Call Myself a Skeptic, that's been making waves in the atheist blogosphere. She's got a thought-provoking argument with which I agree in part and disagree in part, and I thought I'd share my reaction to it. But first, let me echo ...

Read More

Link blog: missiles, london 2012, brian-whelan, olympics

Missiles over London: a new Olympic event | A Latent Existence
"Today Brian Whelan woke up to find information from the Ministry of Defence waiting by his letter box.

The leaflet informed him that during the London 2012 Olympic games the army will be putting missiles on the roof of his building and there will be soldiers on duty there 24 hours a day. He was not asked about this in advance, or given a choice, simply informed that his building was the best place to site these missiles."
(tags: brian-whelan security military missiles london 2012 olympics)

Prayer Problem: Congressman’s sectarian invocation muddies Constitutional waters

U.S. Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), who is chair of the House Armed Forces Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee, has been opening subcommittee meetings with Christian prayers.

“Heavenly Father,…help us to be wise, help us to be good planners and good stewards,” Akin said at the start of a March 29 hearing, according to Congressional Quarterly. “And we pray that you help us with the somewhat busy schedule this morning, and the votes and all. And I pray in Jesus’ name.”

That is but one of several examples in which Akin has raised constitutional issues by opening meetings with prayers.

The Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director, says the Missouri congressman is on the wrong track.

“This is obviously a Christian prayer,” Lynn told CQ. “This is a public prayer in a public space in a public event sponsored by and promoted by a public official who either knows or should know that even members of his own subcommittee do not share the same religious background.”

That’s exactly right. Akin’s subcommittee is especially diverse – Rep. Susan Davis (D-Calif.) is Jewish and Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) is Buddhist. How would Akin feel if Davis chose to pray in Hebrew or Johnson wanted to meditate? What if a Muslim member were running the meetings and offered a prayer to Allah while kneeling toward Mecca?   

Perhaps out of deference to the subcommittee chairman, Davis and Johnson have not yet criticized the sectarian invocations, but another Armed Services Committee member did.

“Any prayer that starts an official public meeting that pertains to any one particular religion is probably not in good judgment,” Rep. Robert Andrews (D-N.J.) told CQ.

Akin defended himself but seemed to miss the point about being inclusive.

“We start Congress with a prayer, and I think it’s a good idea to ask the Lord’s blessing,” he told CQ. “It gives us a sense of being respectful to each other.”

Akin also said that the prayer was a personal one, and his words shouldn’t be taken as representing the whole subcommittee. AU’s Lynn didn’t buy that, calling the defense “too cute by half.”

It’s not a surprise that Akin doesn’t get why anyone would be unhappy with him since this isn’t the first time he has tried to entangle religion and politics. In 2009, he participated in a Family Research Council-sponsored “prayercast” to pray for congressional rejection of health-care overhaul legislation.

Maybe that’s why the Religious Right group was quick to stick up for Akin. In a blog post, the FRC’s Robert Morrison said yesterday that George Washington at his inauguration in 1789 concluded his oath with the words “so help me God” and kissed the Bible.

“Washington was acutely aware that everything he did and said would form a precedent for future presidents,” Morrison wrote. “He was also acutely careful to respect the traditions and beliefs of his fellow citizens of the new republic.”

In fact, historians tell us that there is scant historical evidence that Washington added the extra-constitutional reference to the deity to his oath. He may have, but there’s not much proof of it.

But more importantly, Morrison is right that Washington tried to be careful to respect the beliefs of his fellow citizens. In his public remarks, our first president avoided sectarian references, and he assured religious minorities that they had full rights of citizenship in the United States.

Rep. Akin, in contrast, is offering overtly Christian invocations in his official capacity as a member of the federal government – something Washington did not do. Morrison even admits as much.

“It’s true that President Washington did not mention the name of Jesus in his Inaugural Address on this day in New York City in 1789,” Morrison said.

The Religious Right is always trying to hijack the Founding Fathers when it suits their needs. What Morrison doesn’t realize (or chooses to ignore) is that Washington very rarely discussed religion in any of his personal writings and as a result, we know little about his personal beliefs.

That contrasts sharply with some of today’s political leaders who seem intent on telling us more than we want to know about their personal religious commitments.

Politicians aren’t elected to serve as pastors, they’re elected to make the lives of all citizens better – including the ones who aren’t Christian or don’t believe in God. Akin needs to remember whom he serves, and be more respectful of everyone’s beliefs.

/span>

Related articles:

  1. Supreme Court Action Pans Sectarian Prayer in Government
  2. Supreme Court action pans sectarian prayer in government


What has science ever done for us?

Lord Taverne. Credit: Wikipedia

Well, according to Richard Taverne it is at least partly responsible for making our society more democratic, more tolerant and more compassionate.

Lord Taverne is founding chair of Sense About Science and former Labour minister. He gave this year’s Sense About Science lecture titled: “What has science ever done for us?” (see Annual Lecture · Sense about Science).

The Guardian Science Weekly has made this lecture available as a podcast. You can download it at Science Weekly Extra podcast: What has science ever done for us? I have listened to part of the lecture and it is very thought-provoking.

Alokh Jha, on the Science Weekly blog, gives this introduction to the lecture:

Sense About Science was founded by Richard Taverne 10 years ago to further the public’s understanding of science and help scientists advocate an evidence-based society.

At the time many scientists seemed reluctant to take part in public discourse, now 5,000 have signed up with the organisation to do just that. There’s still some way to go in promoting the public understanding of science in the UK, says Taverne – alternative medicine and the national lottery are thriving, and only one of our MPs is a graduate scientist.

To mark his retirement from Sense About Science, Taverne delivered its annual lecture on Monday 23 April at the Royal Society of Medicine, which posed the question: “What has science ever done for us?”

He argues that … apart from making us wealthy, helping to feed the world, cutting infant mortality, explaining the origins of the planet and our species, letting us fly, watch television, expanding our lifespans, inventing anaesthesia … science has made us more tolerant, compassionate and democratic.

Similar articles

No related articles.


Another Day, Another Apocalypse

The latest person crazy enough to set a solid date for the end of the world is a man by the name of Ronald Weinland. He’s setting the date as May 27, 2012, and he’s not shy about it:

As readers of this site know, May 27, 2012, is the time that I have stated as being the date Jesus Christ will return as King of kings over all government on this earth. For such an event to come to pass, the Trumpets of Revelation must all sound, the United States and dollar collapse, the ten nations of Europe arise to fulfill the final revival of the Holy Roman Empire, and Russia with China must unite against Europe in WWIII.

Weinland is a member of the Worldwide Church of God, a strange sect founded by Herbert W. Armstrong. You might be familiar with it if you read Otagosh, one of the few blogs in our circle that deals with it directly.

Weinland also has some words for those of us who would dare to mock him:

Weinlan is famous enough to have an attack blog dedicated to him: False Prophet Ronald Weinland

walk this way

walk this way
like it? click it!
view in the dark

messolonghi, greece

mr.G and i risked life and limb for this shot. i had a maximum focus length of 200mm in my bag, so we had to sneak up fairly close to these guys, wading through a very shallow but not very solid part of the lake. thankfully, they didn't fly off, and we weren't sucked into quicksand anywhere.

©2012 helen sotiriadis


Pack up your crozier and go NOW, Cardinal Brady!

Cardinal Seán Brady

THE beleaguered Catholic Primate of All-Ireland, Cardinal Seán Brady, has reacted swiftly to a BBC  investigation into his failure to protect children from abuse in the 1970s.

The BBC’s This World show revealed that Cardinal Sean Brady, who has been under pressure to resign some some time, had the names and addresses of those being abused by paedophile priest Brendan Smyth, but did not ensure their safety.

Today, a spokesman for Brady said, among others things, that:

It would be unreasonable and grossly unfair to judge the actions of those at that time by the standards of the clear guidance from the State and the church that only came into existence some 20 years later.

Also that:

It would be totally disingenuous to suggest that Fr Brady, in 1975, had the power to stop Brendan Smyth …

And:

Cardinal Brady has apologised . . . to all victims of abuse. Cardinal Brady has . . . led and developed robust child safeguarding policies and practices since 1996, which include the policy of reporting such allegations to the civil authorities.

The BBC said that  in 1975, Brady – then a priest and teacher in County Cavan – was sent by his bishop to investigate a claim of child sexual abuse by a fellow priest. That priest was later exposed as Ireland’s most prolific paedophile, Father Brendan Smyth.

The first child to tell his parents about the abuse was 14-year-old Brendan Boland.

Brady’s role in the affair became clear in 2010, when it became known that he had been present when the abused boy was questioned.

He claimed, however, that the boy’s father had accompanied him, and described his own role as that of a note-taker.

But the BBC uncovered the notes Brady took while the boy was questioned. The child’s father was not allowed in the room, and the child was immediately sworn to secrecy.

What Cardinal Brady failed to tell anyone in 2010 was that Brendan Boland had also given him and his colleagues the precise details of a group of children, some of whom, were being abused by Smyth.

Cardinal Brady did interview one of them and swore him to secrecy.

This World spoke to all of the children who Brendan Boland had identified. They all told the programme that to the best of their knowledge none of their parents or families were warned in anyway about the paedophile Smyth.

Four of them had been abused by Smyth. Two of them continued to be abused after the 1975 inquiry.

One of them – originally from Belfast – told the programme that Smyth continued to abuse him for another year. He also said Smyth abused his sister for a further seven years and then in turn, his four younger cousins, up to 1988.

Cardinal Brady did consider his position as Primate of all-Ireland when his role in the secret inquiry was first exposed. At the time the Church stressed that in 1975:

No state or church guidelines for responding to allegations of child abuse existed in Ireland.

Gary O’Sullivan, editor of the Irish Catholic newspaper, said Cardinal Brady had questions to answer.

If a child can see the need to save other children, how come priests, ministers of Christianity, cannot have the same awareness.  If he wants to stay in this leadership position, he should show leadership and come out and answer these questions because this culture of silence failed children.

The BBC’s Ireland correspondent, Mark Simpson commented:

Cardinal Sean Brady has been under pressure for some time. But he has always made it clear he will not resign, unless there is specific proof that his failure to act allowed clerical child abuse to take place.

Clearly, he does not believe the evidence in the BBC documentary meets that criteria.

However, with the media spotlight on his past, the Catholic primate is struggling to shift the focus to the present and the future. That is a very uncomfortable position, for any church leader.

Hat tip: BarrieJohn

Stump a Christian #14

If you are 9 months pregnant when the rapture occurs, what happens to the fetus?

Come on, kids, let’s destroy the crops!

Ophelia Benson at Butterflies and Wheels has found a petition for us. But first, a little backstory:

Good old “activists” – anti-vax activists, pro alt med activists, anti-GM crops activists. Hooray for crop failure and famine!

Scientists working on a new generation of genetically modified crops have sent an open letter to anti-GM protesters pleading with them not to destroy “years of work” by attacking their research plots.

The activist group, Take the Flour Back, has pledged to carry out a “decontamination” at a test site in Hertfordshire, where agricultural researchers are growing the world’s first genetically modified wheat that can repel insect pests by emitting a repellent-smelling substance.

Seems the “Take the Flour Back” Luddites think destroying research plantations is a good way to . . . um . . . ensure we don’t make progress in improving crop yields, or something.

Sense About Science has a petition you can sign and circulate.

The Religious Right hasn’t leapt onto the anti-GM bandwagon . . . yet. But I won’t be surprised if they do. After all, isn’t it a matter of scientists “playing god”?

Related articles:

  1. Farah: Gays And Radical Muslims Working Together To Destroy America
  2. Robertson: Asteroid Will Destroy The Earth


Mr. Deity Meets Joseph Smith

In his newest Mr. Deity video, Brian Keith Dalton goes after his own former religion:

Stick with the video after the credits for Brian’s account of what Dan Dennett is really like and to see a message to the Mr. Deity audience from numerous famous atheists (including our own PZ Myers) recorded at the Global Atheist Convention in Sydney.

Your Thoughts?

Photo: Homeless in Las Vegas

HomelessInLasVegas

The thing about Las Vegas is that behind the scenes, the city is pretty brutal. This man sleeps beneath a bridge in front of New York, New York. A thousand people pass him by every hour. Few people pay him any attention. There were dozens of men and woman just like him hidden here and there. You just needed to look.

I watched two cops talk to a homeless man on a walkway over the Strip near the new Cosmopolitan hotel. They were so nice. It was like watching a movie. They even warned the man to stay out of the sun and gave him water. The only thing was, well, they were being filmed for Cops (or something like it). Las Vegas is a show. It’s all for show.

Technorati Tags: ,

Pastor Ron Burning update

Pastor Ron Burning, profiled here, was convicted on 13 of 14 charges. He faces life in prison… twice over. Burning was a Baptist pastor who was arrested crossing an international border between the USA and Canada. It is widely believed he was attempting to flee his crimes.

The jury did not waste much time. It took a day to sort out the charges, which were pretty intense.

Burning, pastor of Johnsfield Baptist Church, was found guilty on three counts of sexual assault, four charges of indecent assault, sexual intercourse with someone under the age of 14, forcible confinement, indecent assault, voyeurism, criminal harassment, indecent assault and gross indecency. These charges, some committed on men and some on women, related to incidents that took place between 1971 and 2009.

There is another story here. Burning was a missionary for the Old Time Baptist church (OTBC) for 12 years. That’s ample time to perpetuate his form of Christianity. There is also his link to OTBC’s school administrator Pastor Robert Piwowar, who murdered his wife and hid her body. I’m thinking OTBC might not be a happy place.

OTBC is silent. Nothing on the blog. No press releases. It’s as if they want to bury their association with Burning. I listened to a few sermons there is nothing there either. There are questions to answer.

Why did they stand by Burning? Did they know of the abuse allegations? Did they report allegations? Were there allegations from Burning’s missionary work? What about their duty of car as mandatory reporters?  The questions are endless, but so is the silence.

Technorati Tags: ,

Mr. Deity Is Introduced to Mormonism

Mr Deity and friends listen to Joseph Smith explain his new religion

Sounds perfectly reasonable.

A Couple Doses of Juvenile Humor

I always love Jimmy Kimmel’s This Week in Unnecessary Censorship and this special unnecessarily NSFW compilation for the occasion of his hosting the White House Correspondents Dinner did not disappoint:

And for real life anchor slip ups too unpredictable and fast to get censored in time, here’s a nice compilation of some of the recent years’ most infamous instances:

The look on the Dari Alexander’s face at 2:36-37 is priceless.

Your Thoughts?

America is doomed

And you know why? Because women are taking over, and they can’t handle the power.

This guy, Jesse Lee Peterson, is amazing. You listen to him, and notice that he’s incoherent and stupid, completely lacking in charisma, with a speaking style that makes you wonder if he’d been stunned with a hammer just before, and yet he’s got a ministry and a television show and is beloved of the Republican Party. Religion and Republicanism really are a route for idiots to succeed.