Call for papers:
Rethinking Inequality: Philosophical Reflections on Recent Empirical Research
University of Ottawa, November 16-17, 2012

Rising economic inequality in Canada and other advanced industrialized states is a phenomenon much discussed by the media in recent years, and much studied by sociologists, social epidemiologists, and scholars of public health. Political theorists and philosophers too have been concerned with abstract notions of equality, and to what extent material inequalities within states are compatible with the more general notion that all individuals are entitled to equal respect. These arguments have however largely failed to consider that high levels of inequality may be correlated with a host of social problems, such as poorer public health, lower levels of social trust, and higher crime rates.

In light of this research, this workshop asks philosophers to reflect on these empirical findings about the social and economic effects of inequality and it asks social scientists to consider whether philosophical conceptions of equality can shed light on possible normative and policy responses to the negative effects of rising social and economic inequality.

We are interested in scholarship focused on these questions: Are philosophical ideas about the notion of equality able to aid in the interpretation of the new data on inequality? Can social scientists benefit from philosophical analysis distinguishing among conceptions of equality? Does the new data press us towards adopting any particular egalitarian perspectives – welfare or resource based or other – as best equipped to respond to the consequences of rising inequality? Additional questions participants may choose to pursue include whether normative theories about equality and inequality need to respond to “real world” facts at all, and what the relationship between the empirical and philosophical ought to be. Participants may also choose to combine reflection on these and other “meta” questions with discussion of aspects of welfare that have been newly illuminated by data on inequality.

Confirmed speakers include Richard Arneson (University of California, San Diego), Joseph Carens (University of Toronto), Miles Corak (University of Ottawa), Jay Drydyk (Carleton University), Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (Aarhus University), Kristi Olson (Princeton/Stanford), Martin O’Neill (York University, UK), and Gopal Sreenivasan (Duke University, tentative).

Those interested to participate should send abstracts (300 words) to Monique Deveaux (mdeveaux@uoguelph.ca) and Patti Tamara Lenard (patti.lenard@uottawa.ca) by May 30, 2012.

Be Sociable, Share!

    Tags: , ,

    I hereby extend a profession-wide invitation to contribute to a new blog I have created that aims to be “by and for” early-career philosophers (including social-political theorists): The Philosophers’ Cocoon.

    This blog aims to be a safe and supportive “grass roots” forum for early-career professional philosophers — graduate students, post-docs, and entry-level faculty members — to discuss their work, ideas, and personal-professional issues.  Philosophers who are not in the “early” stages of their careers are also invited to become contributing members, as their experiences in the profession may, for obvious reasons, be very much relevant to the blog’s aims.

    Blog participants (i.e. any philosopher who wises to participate!) are invited to post (A) working papers and ideas, as well as post comments, questions, or concerns on issues including but not limited to:

    • Navigating graduate school
    • Publishing
    • Work-life-family balance
    • Etc.

    This is not intended to be “my” blog.  My hope is to serve as primarily as blog moderator, and for the blog’s content to be driven by and for any and every early-career philosopher who wishes to contribute. As blog moderator, I promise to rigorously ensure a safe and supportive environment for all.  I will not approve, and will immediately remove, any contributions or comments that I (or anyone else) reasonably finds remotely derogatory or threatening.  Finally, anyone who wishes to make an anonymous post (e.g. to discuss an issue they are not comfortable attaching their name to) is welcome to email me their post and request that I post it anymously.  I will post any and all such requests, provided they otherwise satisfy the aims described in this mission statement.

    If you would like to become a contributor to the Philosopher’s Cocoon, please simply send me an email at marvan@ut.edu.  Please also be sure to tell me in the email your present status (grad student, etc.), and feel free to provide me with a link to your homepage.

    I hope that this blog finds its intended audience and grows organically to meet that audience’s needs.  I very much look forward to meeting anyone and everyone who chooses to participate.

    Sincerely,

    Marcus Arvan

    Assistant Professor of Philosophy

    University of Tampa

     

    Be Sociable, Share!

      9th Annual MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory

      CFP: session on “Ideal and Nonideal Theory”

      Where: Manchester Centre for Political Theory, University of Manchester

      When: September 5-7, 2012

      Conference Organizers: Chris Mills (workshop administrator), Thomas Porter, Jonathan Quong, James Pattison, Stephen De Wijze

      Session Organizer: Marcus Arvan

      Deadline for submissions: June 1, 2012

      The MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory is an annual conference at the University of Manchester on selected topics in political theory. Each session will consist of a reading and discussion of 3-12 selected papers.  The present CFP invites full paper submissions for a session on “ideal” and “nonideal theory.” Potential paper topics include (but are by no means limited to) the following:What is the proper role of “ideal theorizing” in political theory?  How well do existing ideal theories apply to nonideal conditions?  Should nonideal theory be guided by, or independent of, ideal theory?  If nonideal theory should be guided by ideal theory, how?

      If you would like to present a paper in this session, please submit a full paper and abstract to marvan@ut.edu no later than June 1st, 2012. Please also include a separate cover sheet indicating your name, professional status (faculty, graduate student, independent researcher, etc.), and institutional affiliation. Papers may be of any length suitable for a peer-reviewed journal article. Please note that participants are responsible for seeking their own funding for travel/lodging/etc. For further details or questions, please contact marvan@ut.edu. Decision notices will be emailed by June 14th, 2012.

      Be Sociable, Share!
        Constitutional Law and American Democracy: Cases and Readings

        I am happy to announce the publication of my new integrated casebook and reader, Constitutional Law and American Democracy: Cases and Readings, with Wolters Kluwer/Aspen Press:

        http://www.aspenpublishers.com/Product.asp?catalog_name=Aspen&category_name=&product_id=0735579822

         

        If you would like a complimentary copy to review for possible use in your course, please send me an email at Corey_Brettschneider@Brown.edu or to one of the Aspen sales reps, Pandora.Gorman@wolterskluwer.com and note your mailing address. Aspen has been very prompt in sending the books out for review.

        Here is a description: Constitutional Law and American Democracy is an integrated casebook and reader that guides students through the most important conflicts over legal issues and doctrines today, as debated by Supreme Court justices and leading academics. I use selections from the most influential articles and books in constitutional law, political theory, and legal history to introduce students to doctrinal debates. By showing competing interpretations of the Constitution, the book helps students to appreciate the stakes in the disputes between the justices on separation of powers, federalism, civil liberties, and the equal protection of the law. The format also encourages students to form thoughtful and well-developed positions about where they stand in these debates. In my own teaching, I have found that the book’s focus on controversial issues such as abortion rights, gay rights, and the right to bear arms serves as a highly effective “hook” in gaining the attention of students and drawing them into the wider framework of political values, legal doctrine, and constitutional interpretation that ultimately shape court cases and judicial opinions.

        I hope the book is of interest!

        Be Sociable, Share!

          Tags: , , ,

          The inaugural Tennessee Value and Agency Conference will take place in November 2012. Tim Scanlon (Harvard) and Pamela Hieronymi (UCLA) will keynote. The meeting will focus on themes in the moral philosophy of Rawls and Kant. Conference information and the CFA can be found at:

          http://web.utk.edu/~acureto1/tennessee-value-and-agency-tva-conference/

          Abstracts/paper proposals are due by June 15, 2012.

          Be Sociable, Share!

            Tags:

            Evangelia Sembou, Plato’s Political Philosophy (Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2012)

            The aim of the book is to introduce the reader to Plato’s political philosophy. The book is directed towards an audience that approaches Plato for the first time. In Plato politics cannot be dissociated from ethics, metaphysics and epistemology. One cannot fully appreciate Plato’s ‘ideal state’, without understanding Plato’s Theory of Forms and his conception of the soul. For this reason the purpose of the book is to place Plato’s political philosophy within Plato’s philosophy as a whole. The book mainly focuses on Plato’s Republic, but also discusses the Statesman and the Laws. Where necessary and in order to explicate main Platonic doctrines, reference is also made to other Platonic dialogues. The purpose of the book is to serve as a guide to Plato’s political dialogues.
            The book is aimed at undergraduate students of political philosophy and the history of ideas, as well as to the general public.

            Available from:

            http://imprint-academic.com/plato

            http://www.amazon.co.uk/Platos-Political-Philosophy-Evangelia-Sembou/dp/1845402561

            http://www.amazon.com/Platos-Political-Philosophy-Evangelia-Sembou/dp/1845402561

            Be Sociable, Share!

              Tags:

              Global Distributive Justice

              Chris Armstrong, Global Distributive Justice: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

              • This new textbook introduces the major theories and issues in a clear and accessible way, enabling students to navigate their way through the complex and fast-moving set of debates on global justice
              • It connects theory to practice by relating those theories to a series of important issues: human rights, natural resource ownership and sale, international trade, climate change and migration
              • It brings issues to life through the use of Case Studies, and includes ‘Further Issues’ sections which discuss emerging debates that are likely to command increasing attention

              Get 20% off with this link: http://www.cambridge.org/knowledge/discountpromotion?code=ARMSTRONG12

               

              From the reviews:

              ‘In this fine book, Armstrong has filled a significant gap in the literature by providing a very clear, learned and comprehensive discussion.’ Christian Barry.

              ‘This is a lively, clearly written and very helpful textbook that is accessible and yet philosophically engaging.’ Margaret Moore.

              ‘This book does an excellent job of introducing students to some of the most interesting and significant philosophical arguments about global distributive justice…It does students a tremendous service.’ Darrel Moellendorf.

              Be Sociable, Share!
                • About this book

                • A unique collection by contemporary human rights authorities Provides a single picture of the most innovative aspects of human rights
                • Combines contemporary contributions with seminal works
                • The intellectual profile adds value to the political/diplomatic debates on human rights

                This book presents a unique collection of the most relevant perspectives in contemporary human rights philosophy. Different intellectual traditions are brought together to explore some of the core postmodern issues challenging standard justifications. Widely accessible also to non experts, contributions aim at opening new perspectives on the state of the art of the philosophy of human rights. This makes this book particularly suitable to human rights experts as well as master and doctoral students.
                Further, while conceived in a uniform and homogeneous way, the book is internally organized around three central themes: an introduction to theories of rights and their relation to values; a set of contributions presenting some of the most influential contemporary strategies; and finally a number of articles evaluating those empirical challenges springing from the implementation of human rights. This specific set-up of the book provides readers with a stimulating presentation of a growing and interconnecting number of problems that post-natural law theories face today.
                While most of the contributions are new and specifically conceived for the present occasion, the volume includes also some recently published influential essays on rights, democracy and their political implementation.

                Content Level » Research

                Related subjects »Applied Ethics & Social ResponsibilityInternational, Foreign and Comparative LawPolitical ScienceValue Theory

                Table of contents

                List of contributors.- Acknowledgments.- Introduction; Claudio Corradetti.- PART I Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Human Rights.- Chapter I Human Rights in History and Contemporary Practice: Source Materials for Philosophy; Jeffrey Flynn.- Chapter II Philosophy and Human Rights: Contemporary Perspectives; David Reidy.- Chapter III Reconsidering Realism on Rights; William E. Scheuerman.- PART II The Validit-(ies) of Human Rights.- Chapter IV The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights; Jürgen Habermas.- Chapter V The Justification of Human Rights and the Basic Right to Justification. A Reflexive Approach; Rainer Forst.- Chapter VI Social Harm, Political Judgment, and the Pragmatics of Justification; Albena Azmanova.- Chapter VII “It All Depends”: The Universal and the Contingent in Human Rights; Wojciech Sadurski.- Chapter VIII Tiny Sparks of Contingency. On the Aesthetics of Human Rights; Giovanna Borradori.- Chapter IX The Idea of a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights; Alessandro Ferrara.- PART III Democracy and Human Rights.- Chapter X Is there a Human Right to Democracy? ; Seyla Benhabib.- Chapter XI Dialectical Snares: Human Rights and Democracy in the World Society; Hauke Brunkhorst.- Chapter XII The Normality of Constitutional Politics: an Analysis of the Drafting of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; Richard Bellamy and Justus Schönlau.- Chapter XIII Rights in Progress. The Politics of Rights and the Democracy-Building Processes in Comparative Perspective; Lorella Cedroni.- Chapter XIV Ethnopolitics. The Challenge for Human and Minority Rights Protection; Joseph Marko.- Chapter XV Human Rights in the Information Society: Utopias, Dystopias and Human Values; Giovanni Sartor.- Index.

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  Tags:

                  MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory – Ninth Annual Conference
                  Manchester Centre for Political Theory (MANCEPT), University of Manchester
                  5th – 7th September 2012

                  Workshop on Well-being and Public Policy: Call for Abstracts

                  David Cameron, in a recent speech on introducing national measures of well-being to inform public policy, claimed that the UK government is aiming to measure the progress of the nation, “not just by how our economy is growing, but by how our lives are improving; not just by our standard of living, but by our quality of life.” In short, the UK government is looking to measure the nation’s well-being in order to “help make a better life for people.” Other governments and international organizations are also increasingly focusing upon well-being as a policy goal.

                  This workshop will focus on whether, and how, public policy can and should be informed, in some way, by considerations of the public’s well-being. There will be up to 12 speakers in total, who will be invited to give a 30 minute presentation, followed by a discussion. Potential areas of interest include (but are not limited to):

                  • The role of well-being in public policy
                  • The limits of political utilitarianism
                  • Paternalism and well-being
                  • The implications of different theories of well-being for public policy
                  • The interaction between different measures of well-being and public policy

                  If you are interested to present during this workshop, please send to one or both of us an abstract of no more than 500 words with your full name and institutional affiliation before May 15th.

                  Convenors:
                  Sam Wren-Lewis (University of Leeds): samwrenlewis@gmail.com
                  Tim Taylor (visiting research fellow, University of Leeds): phltet@leeds.ac.uk

                  Further details about the conference available at
                  http://manceptworkshops2012.wordpress.com/.

                  Be Sociable, Share!

                    Over at the Bleeding Heart Libertarians blog, we’re running a symposium this week on the topic of “Libertarianism and Land,” featuring essays by Eric Mack, Hillel Steiner, Fred Foldvary, Kevin Carson, and David Schmidtz.

                    The first essay went up this morning: “Natural Rights and Natural Stuff,” by Eric Mack. The other essays will go up one per morning for the rest of the week.

                    Be Sociable, Share!

                      Tags:

                      Punishment is the most comprehensive monograph on the subject available. It is accessible for readers coming to the topic for the first time with new arguments and developments in each chapter that will be of interest to those already working in the field, including the defence of a new theory of punishment: the unified theory of punishment and its ideal of punitive restoration.

                      The blurb:
                      Punishment is a topic of increasing importance for citizens and policy makers. Why should we punish criminals? Which theory of punishment is most compelling? Is the death penalty ever justified? These questions and many others are addressed in this highly engaging guide. Punishment is a critical introduction to the philosophy of punishment offering a new and refreshing approach that will benefit readers of all backgrounds and interests. This is the first critical guide to examine all leading contemporary theories of punishment, including the communicative theory of punishment, restorative justice, and the unified theory of punishment. There are also several case studies examined in detail including capital punishment, juvenile offending, and domestic abuse.

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                      Be Sociable, Share!

                        Tags: , , , , , , ,

                        The latest issue of the European Journal of Political Theory (11.2) is now available and can be found here: http://ept.sagepub.com/content/11/2.toc
                        Special issue: Just war in the shadow of 9/11: Ten years on
                        Guest editors: Graham Long and Peter Sutch
                        Contributors

                        Editorial: Just war in the shadow of 9/11: Ten years on

                        David Boucher: The just war tradition and its modern legacy: Jus ad bellum and jus in bello

                        Cian O’Driscoll: A ‘fighting chance’ or fighting dirty? Irregular warfare, Michael Gross and the Spartans

                        James Pattison: The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory

                        Peri Roberts: The supreme emergency exemption: Rawls and the use of force

                        Peter Sutch: Human rights and the use of force: Assertive liberalism and just war

                        Mark Evans: Just war, democracy, democratic peace

                        Graham Long: Disputes in just war theory and meta-theory

                         

                        Be Sociable, Share!

                          The MultiRights project in collaboration with the Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature, the Norwegian Association for Legal Philosophy and the Norwegian Kant Society is organizing a workshop on Kantian Theory and International Human Rights Courts on August 27, and a graduate conference on August 28 at the University of Oslo. Paper proposals for the graduate conference may be submitted before May 18.

                          The August 27 workshop has the following program:

                          • Katrin Flikschuh (LSE): ‘Universal Human Rights and Selective Enforcement: some Kantian Reservations’
                          • Peter Niesen (Darmstadt): ‘Border-crossing Speech as a Human Right: a Kantian Perspective’
                          • Thomas Pogge (Yale): ‘Kantian Theory and International Human Rights Courts’
                          • Howard Williams (Aberystwyth): ‘Kantian Underpinnings for a Theory of Multirights’

                          For further information go to http://tinyurl.com/blbpjfk or write to reidar.maliks@nchr.uio.no. The workshop is free and open to the public but please let us know if you would like to attend.

                          The following day, the University of Oslo will host a graduate conference supported by the Norwegian Kant Society along with the Norwegian Association for Legal Philosophy with the aim of promoting Ph.D. level research and knowledge dissemination in the inter-disciplinary crossroads of Kantian philosophy and human rights jurisprudence. Graduate students are invited to submit a proposal for a paper, the presentation of which should be no longer than 30 minutes including questions and discussion. Papers will receive comments from Dr. Peter Niesen and Dr. Carola Freiin von Villiez. Professor Howard Williams will give a talk on ‘Re-evaluating Kant’s political philosophy after 30 years’.

                          Notification of accepted abstracts will be sent out no later than June 1st. Abstracts should be submitted to j.b.l.kristensen@ifikk.uio.no by May 18th.  The Norwegian Kant Society can reimburse travel accommodation expenses up to NOK 2000 (ca. 265€) for each participant presenting a paper at the Ph.D. conference. Of special concern is the promotion of research in Kantian philosophy and human rights in the Nordic countries, but everyone is invited to submit an abstract. There is a limit to the number of of seminar papers due to time constraints, however. Participation is open to the public, although prior registration is encouraged (j.b.l.kristensen@ifikk.uio.no)

                          Both events will take place at the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, Cort Adelers gate 30, Oslo, Norway.

                          Be Sociable, Share!

                            Law, Ethics and Philosophy (LEAP) is a new peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to work in ethics, legal theory, and social and political philosophy. It welcomes clear, rigorous and original submissions addressing concrete issues of public concern as well as more abstract theoretical questions. It also has the distinctive aims of (a) fostering work drawing on a variety of disciplines within the social and natural sciences, including biology, economics, history, and psychology; and (b) promoting dialogue between the Anglophone and non-Anglophone worlds.

                            We invite submissions of articles up to 10,000 words, discussion notes up to 5,000 words, and replies and exchanges not exceeding 3,000 words. All published submissions will be subject to double blind review, and the journal will notify authors of submitted pieces about the progress of their submission within six weeks.

                            Although LEAP accepts exclusively submissions in English the journal strongly encourages submissions from authors who also write in languages other than English, and will always strive to ensure that their work is assessed on the basis of its content and not primarily its mode of expression. Where necessary the editorial process provides such authors with guidance regarding matters of English style.

                            The journal is published digitally by Marcial Pons, the leading publisher of analytical legal philosophy in the Spanish-speaking world. Volume I will include articles by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Thomas Pogge, and Michael Smith, among others, and be an open-access sample publication.

                             

                            Submission Guidelines

                            Submission of a manuscript to LEAP is understood to imply that the manuscript is offered for first publication in LEAP and that no version is under consideration by any other journal or publisher. This guideline does not rule out submissions published as working papers or posted electronically on the author’s personal website or for circulation at a conference.

                            Papers should be submitted as WORD or PDF documents and composed in a twelve point font. First submissions should not contain acknowledgements or any information that could identify the author to reviewers. Submissions should also be edited carefully to contain no more words than necessary.

                            Papers should be accompanied by a separate WORD or PDF document containing a title and word count, an abstract of less than 250 words, five keywords, the author’s contact details and affiliation, and a short biographical note. The accompanying document should also contain any material withheld from the paper to preserve anonymity.

                            All submissions should be sent to: leap.journal@marcialpons.es. Enquiries regarding the journal may be directed to: leap.editors@marcialpons.es.

                             

                            Editors

                            José Luis Martí, Pompeu Fabra University

                            Hugo Seleme, NationalUniversity of Córdoba,Argentina

                             

                            Associate Editors

                            Ingvild Almås,NorwegianSchoolof Economics

                            Samantha Besson,FribourgUniversity

                            Paula Casal,ICREA-PompeuFabraUniversity

                            Jordi Ferrer,UniversityofGirona

                            Ernesto Garzón Valdés,JohannesGutenbergUniversity,Mainz

                            Cristina Lafont, Northwestern University

                            Genoveva Martí, ICREA-University ofBarcelona

                            Lukas Meyer,UniversityofGraz

                            José Juan Moreso,PompeuFabraUniversity

                            Serena Olsaretti,ICREA-PompeuFabraUniversityandUniversityofCambridge

                            Félix Ovejero,UniversityofBarcelona

                            Zofia Stemplowska,UniversityofWarwick

                            Andrew Williams,ICREA-PompeuFabraUniversity

                             

                            Editorial Board

                            Aulis Aarnio, Lucy Allais, Elizabeth Anderson, Richard Arneson, Gustaf Arrhenius, Michael Baurmann, Juan Carlos Bayón, Carmen Bevia, David Bilchitz, Geoffrey Brennan, Ian Carter, Joseph Chan, Thomas Christiano, Bruno Celano, Antony Duff, John Ferejohn, Victor Ferreres, Roberto Gargarella, Robert Goodin, Axel Gosseries, Lori Gruen, Riccardo Guastini, Alon Harel, Daniel Hausman, János Kis, Matthew Kramer, David Lefkowitz, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Frank Lovett, Stephen Macedo, Jeff McMahan, Jane Mansbridge, Adèle Mercier, Liam Murphy, Ingmar Persson, Philip Pettit, Thomas Pogge, Wlodek Rabinowicz, Joseph Raz, Debra Satz, Julian Savulescu, Seana Shiffrin, Anne Stilz, Victor Tadros, Larry Temkin, Jeffrey Tulis, Philippe Van Parijs, Georgia Warnke, Ruth Zimmerling.

                             

                            Be Sociable, Share!

                              MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory – Ninth Annual Conference

                              Manchester Centre for Political Theory (MANCEPT), University of Manchester, 5th – 7th September 2012

                              WORKSHOP ON ACCEPTABLE REASONS AND PUBLIC DELIBERATION

                              Convenor: Enrico Biale (University of Piemonte Orientale)

                              Many democratic theories tend to put forward the exchange of “acceptable reasons” as a main requirement of public deliberation: when deliberating on public affairs, citizens should strive to offer reasons that are ‘acceptable to all’. From an epistemic point of view, such a demand is assumed to make it all the more likely that deliberation’s outcome will itself be ‘acceptable’ from a general perspective. From a moral point of view, it is supposed to manifest each citizen’s commitment to democratic reciprocity and to equal participation in collective decision-making.

                              However, attempts to specify the criteria of acceptability encounter dire difficulties. First of all, in what sense can reasons be ‘acceptable’, if acceptability is to be reduced neither to de facto acceptance nor to normative truth? Furthermore, what are the bounds of the community within which reasons should be ‘acceptable to all’? Finally, how can we reconcile the need for an independent criterion of “acceptability” with the idea that deliberation should not simply reaffirm a prior conception of the acceptable, but rather help shape such a conception?

                              Confronted with these difficulties, recent contributions have suggested that deep pluralism makes the very idea of “reasons acceptable to all” irrelevant: we should rather focus on “reasons that people do accept” and submit them to substantive standards like the consistency with the requirements of reasonableness

                              Although such a proposal addresses real pitfalls, it is not clear if it is consistent with the epistemic, moral, and critical requirements that democratic deliberation ought to fulfill by granting the inclusion of each citizen’s claims on an equal footing and enhancing her critical standpoint, instead of focusing on her actual beliefs and preferences.

                              This panel aims to clarify what kind of ‘acceptability requirement’ democratic deliberation can and should impose on public reasons, if any.

                              This is a representative (and non-exhaustive) list of the topics of discussion:

                              • In what sense can deliberative reasons be said ‘acceptable’ ?
                              • To whom should reasons be acceptable in public deliberation? All members of the political community? All persons who are affected by the outcome of a deliberation? All human beings?
                              • Is ‘acceptability to all’ better understood as mutual acceptability? qualified acceptability? reasonable acceptability? universal acceptability?
                              • To be acceptable, do reasons have to be grounded in shared interests or common values? Can they be grounded in self-interests and partisan values?
                              • Should deliberative democracy dispense with the idea of reasons that are acceptable to all?

                              Those who are interested in participating in the workshop are invited to send a short abstract (300-500 words) to Enrico Biale (enrico.biale@unipmn.it) by the 1st of June 2012.

                              Further information on the Mancept Workshops can be found at http://manceptworkshops2012.wordpress.com/

                               

                               

                              Be Sociable, Share!

                                The Faculty of Philosophy (University of Bucharest) hosts a photo exhibition during the conference Global Justice: Norms and Limits (Bucharest, 10 – 12 May, 2012). The exhibition is meant to illustrate from different points of view issues related to human rights violations, military interventions, environmental degradation, military interventions, economic exploitation, terrorist and piracy attacks etc.

                                Please send your proposals to globaljustice@ub-filosofie.ro until 1st of May 2012. We welcome all suggestions (such as links to photos available under a Creative Commons license). If you know anyone interested, please pass it along.  Thank you!

                                [Keynote and guest speakers include: Thomas Pogge (Yale), David Miller (Oxford), Hillel Steiner (Manchester), Véronique Zanetti (Bilefield), Sebastiano Maffettone (Roma), Andreas Føllesdal (Oslo), and Lea Ypi (Oxford).]

                                Be Sociable, Share!

                                  MORAL AND POLITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON DEMOCRACY

                                  The conference will be held at the University of Geneva on 27-28 June 2012. Speakers include: Prof. Richard Bellamy (University College London, UK), Prof. Jane Mansbridge (Harvard University, USA), Prof. David Miller (University of Oxford, UK), Prof. Cécile Laborde (University College London, UK), among many others. For more information please visit http://www.demconf.org. Contact Dr. Annabelle Lever (Programme Chair; Associate Professor of Normative Political Theory, University of Geneva, Switzerland) – annabelle@unige.ch.

                                  Dr. Evangelia Sembou

                                  http://www.psa.ac.uk/spgrp/39/polthought.aspx

                                  Be Sociable, Share!

                                    FINAL CALL FOR PAPERS – Deadline for submission of abstract: 9th April 2012

                                    Brave New World 2012, the Sixteenth Annual Postgraduate Conference organised under the auspices of the Manchester Centre for Political Theory (MANCEPT), will take place on Wednesday 27th and Thursday 28th June 2012 at the University of Manchester.

                                    We are pleased to announce that our guest speakers this year are:

                                    Richard Arneson (University of California, San Diego)

                                    Charles Larmore (Brown University)

                                    The Brave New World conference series is now established as a leading international forum dedicated exclusively to the discussion of postgraduate research in political theory. The conference offers a great opportunity for postgraduates from many different countries and universities to share experiences, concerns and research interests, to exchange stimulating ideas and to make new friends – all in a financially accessible and highly informal setting. Participants will also have the chance to meet and talk about their work with eminent academics, including members of faculty from the University of Manchester and guest speakers, who will deliver keynote addresses at the event.

                                    Guest speakers in previous years have included Brian Barry, Simon Caney, G.A. Cohen, Roger Crisp, Cecile Fabre, Jerry Gaus, Peter Jones, Chandran Kukathas, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Susan Mendus, David Miller, Onora O’Neill, Michael Otsuka, Bhikhu Parekh, Carole Pateman, Anne Phillips, Thomas Pogge, Joseph Raz, Andrea Sangiovanni, Quentin Skinner, Adam Swift, Philippe Van Parijs, Leif Wenar, Andrew Williams, and Jonathan Wolff.

                                    Papers focusing on any area of political theory or political philosophy are welcome. If you would like to present a paper then please send a 300-word, anonymised abstract (including the title of the paper) to Brave.New.World@manchester.ac.uk no later than 9th April 2012. Please also include in your email, name and institutional affiliation. Please note that the conference is self-financed and participants are responsible for seeking their own funding. For further details please contact us at Brave.New.World@manchester.ac.uk

                                    Be Sociable, Share!

                                      The Department of Politics at the University of York is now accepting applications to its long-established MA programmes in Political Philosophy and Political Philosophy (The Idea of Toleration). We typically welcome 20+ postgraduate students each year to read for these two interlinked programmes.

                                      Applications for the MA Political Philosophy (The Idea of Toleration) received by April 10th will be eligible to be considered for a Morrell Studentship, which covers fees at Home/EU rates and a stipend.

                                      Further details about these programmes, including profiles of previous students and information on the research interests of staff, is available here:

                                      http://www.york.ac.uk/politics/prospective/postgraduates/pg-courses/ma-in-political-philosophy/

                                      Be Sociable, Share!

                                        Announcing PRAXIS, a new blog at Big Think devoted to theory-informed political commentary on the issues of the day:

                                        http://bigthink.com/blogs/praxis

                                        Readers can subscribe to the blog here.

                                        To sign up for email alerts when new posts go up, send an email to smazie[at]bard[dot]edu with “subscribe Praxis” as the subject, or follow me on Twitter: @stevenmazie

                                        – Steven Mazie

                                        Be Sociable, Share!

                                          The program for the manuscript workshop on “The Authority of Democracy,” by Daniel Viehoff of the University of Sheffield, is now available here:

                                          http://profs-polisci.mcgill.ca/abizadeh/GRIPP-2012-Workshop.htm

                                          The workshop will be held at McGill University on 2012-05-29.

                                          Be Sociable, Share!

                                            Conference: ‘Measures of Subjective Well-being for Public Policy: Philosophical Perspectives’

                                            Registration now open.

                                            Keynote Speakers:

                                            Richard Layard
                                            Peter Railton
                                            Valerie Tiberius
                                            Dan Haybron

                                            This post is to inform the ‘Public Reason’ blog community about an inter-disciplinary international conference on “Measures of Subjective Well-being for Public Policy” taking place at the University of Leeds, 13-15 July, 2012.

                                            The conference aims to bring together philosophers and non-philosophers – from psychologists and sociologists to economists and public policy practitioners – to discuss the philosophical foundations of the use of measures of subjective well-being in public policy. There are many philosophical issues involved in such a practice, which have so far been relatively unexplored. These include:

                                            How do measures of subjective well-being relate to philosophical accounts of happiness and well-being?

                                            Are subjective well-being measures valid and prudentially relevant, and are they intra- and inter-personally comparable?

                                            How do measures of subjective well-being relate to other measures of well-being, such as GDP? Can we compare these different kinds of measures?

                                            How can and should measures of subjective well-being be used to monitor progress, inform policy design, and appraise policy?

                                            Do such measures lead towards a new kind of political utilitarianism?

                                            These issues have been largely unexplored in part because of the lack of dialogue between philosophers and non-philosophers working on the role of subjective well-being in public policy. This conference seeks to bridge that gap, offering a unique opportunity to promote inter-disciplinary dialogue on how well-being research might best be applied to policy-making.

                                            For more information on conference topics and speakers, please visit the conference website:

                                            <https://sites.google.com/site/wellbeingconference/ .

                                            To register for the conference, please do so either directly by going to the relevant page on the IDEA CETL website here <http://www.idea.leeds.ac.uk/2012/01/measures-of-subjective-well-being-for-public-policy-philosophical-perspectives/> or indirectly through the ‘registration’ page on the conference website here  <https://sites.google.com/site/wellbeingconference/home/registration> .

                                            Be Sociable, Share!

                                              Tags:

                                              I am updating this posting since the university HR webpage for the political philosophy position has changed. To apply for the position please click here. The Department of Philosophy at Virginia Tech is still accepting applications for this position. — SCM 3/22/12.

                                              ***

                                              The Department of Philosophy at Virginia Tech is searching for four visiting assistant professors for 2012-13. In particular, since I am leaving Virginia Tech for the Department of Philosophy at Florida State University, one of the VAP positions is for a political philosopher with some interdisciplinary research/teaching interests and an AOC in philosophy of law. A second position is for an ethicist with AOCs in metaethics and biomedical ethics. The two other positions are for a philosopher of science and for a history of modern philosophy specialist. The teaching load for all four positions is 3/3.

                                              Applicants must do two things:

                                              (1) Submit a dossier and applications materials online at www.jobs.vt.edu [Current Job Openings > Instructional/Research Faculty] or via the following links:

                                              Political Philosophy: 0121625
                                              Ethics: 0121505
                                              Philosophy of Science: 0121546
                                              History of Modern Philosophy: 0121547

                                              (2) Arrange for three letters of recommendation to be sent to Terry Zapata at tzapata [at] vt.edu (with “POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY,” “ETHICS,” “SCIENCE,” or “HISTORY” in the subject line of the email, as appropriate).

                                              Review of applications will begin immediately and will continue until the positions are filled.

                                              Be Sociable, Share!

                                                Yale University
                                                SML Lecture Hall
                                                April 12-13, 2012

                                                April 12th, 9:30am–6pm: The Next Steps for Global Poverty Alleviation
                                                Panelists will discuss the next steps that should be taken towards the alleviation of global poverty. Discussion will focus on the question of what should replace the Millennium Development Goals after their expiration in 2015. During this discussion, panelists will examine what has been learned about reducing severe poverty, and which lessons must be highlighted in any MDG-replacement efforts. In addition there will be a presentation of the main efforts led by ASAP and discussion of future directions for the organization.

                                                April 13, 9:00am–5pm: Moral Psychology and Poverty Alleviation
                                                Participants will discuss how cognitive science and moral psychology can help us to more effectively motivate individuals to fulfill their moral obligations to alleviate global poverty. This workshop marks the launch of ASAP’s Moral Psychology and Poverty Alleviation (MPPA) project, which aims to support sustained collaborative and applicable research on this issue.

                                                Program

                                                April 12: The Next Steps for Global Poverty Alleviation

                                                Part I: Academics Stand Against Poverty: The First Year
                                                9:30-10:00 – Opening remarks by Thomas Pogge (Yale University)
                                                10:00-10:40 – ASAP: First Year and Future Directions
                                                10:40-11:00 – Coffee Break
                                                11:00 – 11:25 – Presentation on the Millennium Development Goals
                                                11:25 – 11:50 – Presentation on ASAP’s Global Poverty Consensus Report Project
                                                11:50-1 – Buffet lunch provided for attendees

                                                Part II: Global Poverty Alleviation After 2015: Where Do We Go From Here?
                                                1:00-1:45 – Thomas Pogge (Yale University)
                                                1:45-2:30 – Philip Alston New York (University)
                                                2:30-3:15 – Branko Milanovic (World Bank Research?Department)
                                                3:15-3:35 – Coffee Break
                                                3:35-4:20 – Gustav Ranis (Yale University)
                                                4:20-5:05 – Hugh Evans (Global Poverty Project)
                                                5:05-6:15 – Panel discussion with Thomas Pogge, Philip Alston, Branko Milanovic, Gustav Ranis and Hugh Evans
                                                6:15 – Reception

                                                April 13: Moral Psychology and Poverty Alleviation

                                                9:00-9:20 – Opening Remarks and Welcome
                                                9:20-10:00 – Dean Spears (Princeton University), “The Hidden Role of Inferred (Implied?) Effectiveness in the Identifiable Victim Effect?”
                                                10:00-10:40 – Gordon Kraft-Todd (Massachusetts General Hospital/Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard Law School), “It Doesn’t Hurt to Ask for More: Framing Donation Appeals to Optimize Charitable Donations”
                                                10:40-11:20 – Keynote: Paul Slovic (University of Oregon/Decision Research), “Affective and Deliberative Processes Underlying the Arithmetic of Compassion”
                                                11:20-11:30 – Break
                                                11:30 -12:10 – Meena Krishnamurthy (University of Manitoba) and Matthew Lindauer (Yale University), “The Effectiveness of Negative and Positive Duty Based Arguments in Motivating Action to Alleviate Global Poverty”
                                                12:10-12:50 – Luke Buckland (Rutgers University) and Carissa Veliz (CUNY/University of Salamanca), “The Impact of Arguments about Global Poverty on Moral Judgments about Giving”
                                                12:50-2:00 – Lunch
                                                2:00-2:40 – Jay D. Mussen (Harvard University), “Why Don’t We help?: Mere Proximity and Other Factors Affecting the Perceived Moral Obligation to Aid Desperate Strangers”
                                                2:40-3:20 – Judith Lichtenberg (University of Georgetown), “Poverty Alleviation, Demandingness, and the Relativity of Well-Being”
                                                3:20-3:30 – Break
                                                3:30-4:10 – Keynote: Nicole Hassoun (Carnegie Mellon University), “How People Think About Meeting Needs”
                                                4:10-4:50 – William Crouch (Giving What We Can), “Motivating People to Give What They Can: Some findings from the Field”

                                                Sponsors: The British Council, the Global Justice Program of the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Centre for International and Area Studies, the Department of Cognitive Science at Yale University, Kempf Memorial Fund

                                                Please register for the conference by contacting Katie Lewis at: katie@academicsstand.org

                                                You can find more information about Academics Stand Against Poverty (ASAP) here.

                                                Be Sociable, Share!

                                                  Tags:

                                                  Apologies that this is very last minute, but the following job advert may be of interest.

                                                  Central European University invites applications for a full-time junior position in the field of ethics. The position will be a joint appointment between the Department of Philosophy (2/3) and the newly founded School of Public Policy and International Affairs (1/3). Candidates must demonstrate excellence and strong commitment to research and teaching.

                                                  Starting Date: 1 August 2012

                                                  Application Deadline: 20th Match 2012

                                                  Full advert available here for download.

                                                  Be Sociable, Share!
                                                    The Boston Review March/April Forum tackles the question of What to Do about Inequality.
                                                    David Grusky, Stanford sociologist and Director of the Center on Poverty and Inequality, argues in his lead essay that if we’re serious about reducing inequality, we need to do more than raise taxes on the rich. We need to correct the market failures in labor and education that generate it:

                                                    Market institutions are riddled with inequality-generating corruption, bottlenecks, and sweetheart deals, a state of affairs that demands that our institutions be reformed rather than treated as inviolable. When OWS participants point out that market regulations are shaped by lobbyists, powerful corporations, and the well off, they are hardly telling a story about thin rules that merely enable the invisible hand. Instead the story is about a very visible hand distorting market principles.

                                                    The Forum includes responses from Neal McCluskey (Cato Institute), Shikha Dalmia (Reason Foundation), Rick Perlstein, Glenn Loury, Ruy Teixeira, Anne Alstott, Susan Mayer, and others.
                                                    Be Sociable, Share!

                                                      Theme: Political Theory and the ‘Liberal’ Tradition

                                                       Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford | 19-20 April 2012

                                                      Graduate students and academics are invited to attend the inaugural Oxford Graduate Conference in Political Theory, to be held at the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, on 19-20 April 2012. The theme for this conference is “Political Theory and the ‘Liberal’ Tradition”, and there will be four panels of student speakers, as well as two keynote addresses, given by Professor Jeremy Waldron (University of Oxford) and Professor Charles Mills (Northwestern University).

                                                      The deadline for registration is 15 April 2012, and attendees can register online at: http://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/index.php/component/option,com_seminar/Itemid,138/

                                                      Be Sociable, Share!

                                                        Hello,

                                                        If you have final-year undergraduates who are thinking of pursuing graduate studies in political philosophy, they might be interested to know that the University of Sheffield’s MA in Political Theory is accepting applications for funded studentships until March 30 (and for unfunded places until August 31). This one-year MA is offered jointly by Sheffield’s Departments of Politics and Philosophy, both ranked highly (equal 1st and 4th respectively) among UK departments in the most recent national Research Assessment Exercise. Our MA students have done very well in applications to PhD programmes in both the UK and North America. More information is available here. If you could draw this opportunity to the attention of suitable students, I would be very grateful.

                                                        Be Sociable, Share!

                                                          Workshop on ‘Normative Justifications for the Welfare State: Markets, Cooperation and Regulation’

                                                          MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory – Ninth Annual Conference
                                                          Manchester Centre for Political Theory (MANCEPT), University of Manchester
                                                          5th – 7th September 2012

                                                          The welfare state is a, if not the, major institution of modern industrialized societies, which competences cover a large array of topics. When it comes to justify why the welfare state is doing this or that, diverse arguments are usually mobilized (equality, community, public interest, satisfaction of basic needs, etc.).

                                                          Political theorists for instance identified one of its key functions as one of redistribution. Welfare state’s role however exceeds pure redistribution by including the provision of goods and services (not limited to the traditional ‘public goods’), regulation of markets, guarantee of the conditions for a fair cooperation and risk-management. These various activities explain the importance of public institutions in the promotion of collective welfare and economic growth.

                                                          The workshop proposes to articulate the traditional justifications for the welfare state framed in terms of equality and justice, common in political theory, with other justifications, present in public policy and economic theory, which appeal to the principle of efficiency. This latter topic is essential for industrialized societies because it offers a deeper and more comprehensive look into the role of the state in the promotion of the collective welfare and also in the establishment of efficient mechanisms of cooperation.

                                                          The purpose of the workshop is to overview the various reasons for supporting public institutions, the interaction between these different reasons and their joint coherence; and their relative strength in front of the main critiques of the welfare state.

                                                          Potential areas of interest (not exclusive though):

                                                          • The diverse theories for justifying the welfare state (e.g. egalitarian, communitarian, etc.)
                                                          • Welfare state as a risk-manager,
                                                          • Markets and the state: justifications of the public/private split, principles of regulation (e.g. externalities, collective actions problems, etc.),
                                                          • Public v. private insurance for health, unemployment benefits and pensions.

                                                          If you are interested to present during this workshop, please send to both of us an abstract of no more than 500 words (or a complete paper) with your complete name and institutional affiliation before May 30th. Please note that you will be kindly asked to provide a draft of your paper a couple of weeks before the event.

                                                          Convenors:
                                                          Karsten Klint Jensen (University of Copenhagen): kkj@foi.ku.dk
                                                          Xavier Landes (CESEM, University of Copenhagen): xavier.landes@gmail.com

                                                          Be Sociable, Share!

                                                            Tags: ,

                                                            Call For Papers: Le pluralisme libéral et ses critiques

                                                            Le CEVIPOF (Sciences Po Paris) et le CEHUM (Université de Minho) organisent un colloque de deux jours sur le pluralisme libéral et ses critiques. Il aura lieu à Paris les 20 et 21 septembre 2012.

                                                            Les chercheurs participant à ce colloque incluent :

                                                            • Catherine Audard (London School of Economics and Political Science)
                                                            • Richard Bellamy (University College London)
                                                            • João Cardoso Rosas (Université du Minho)
                                                            • George Crowder (Flinders University)
                                                            • Gil Delannoi (CEVIPOF, Sciences Po Paris)
                                                            • William Galston (The Brookings Institution & University of Maryland)
                                                            • Cécile Laborde (University College London)
                                                            • Charles Larmore (Brown University) [to be confirmed]
                                                            • Véronique Munoz-Dardé (University College London & UC Berkeley) [to be confirmed]
                                                            • Ruwen Ogien (CERSES, CNRS)
                                                            • Daniel Weinstock (Université de Montréal)

                                                            La question du pluralisme s’est aujourd’hui imposée dans les divers domaines de la recherche en sciences sociales et politiques, tout comme dans les discours publics. Parmi les courants actuels de théorie politique, le pluralisme libéral se caractérise par le fait qu’il intègre au socle du libéralisme politique les exigences du pluralisme des valeurs. La place centrale qu’occupe ce courant dans les débats académiques et publics anglo-américains contraste singulièrement avec le peu de discussions qui lui sont directement consacrées dans l’espace français. Il y a là une lacune que le présent colloque vise à combler en rassemblant, pour la première fois en France, des auteurs de premier plan dont les travaux mettent en lumière les enjeux cruciaux du pluralisme libéral. Enjeux à la fois théoriques et pratiques puisqu’il s’agira de mettre en perspective les sources politiques, historiques et conceptuelles du pluralisme libéral avec les controverses très concrètes qu’il a suscitées et suscite encore dans la vie politique des sociétés d’aujourd’hui.

                                                            Ce courant de pensée se situe au carrefour de la théorie morale et de la philosophie politique. Le « pluralisme des valeurs » (« value-pluralism ») est une notion qui recouvre plusieurs significations. Sur un plan factuel, c’est d’abord une manière de nommer le constat de la diversité des croyances morales et des visions du bien dans les sociétés démocratiques contemporaines. C’est ensuite une thèse d’épistémologie morale portant sur la structure de notre univers moral et consistant à affirmer que les valeurs sont conflictuelles et incommensurables. C’est enfin une thèse normative qui valorise l’existence de cette pluralité irréductible de valeurs et de conceptions du bien. La confusion entre ces différentes acceptions concourt, pour une grande part, à entretenir les mécompréhensions persistantes dont les pensées pluralistes font l’objet en France, où elles restent souvent assimilées à des positions aussi dissemblables que le relativisme moral, le différentialisme, le multiculturalisme ou encore le « communautarisme ».

                                                            Read the rest of this entry »

                                                            Be Sociable, Share!

                                                              The inaugural Tennessee Value and Agency Conference will take place in November 2012.  Tim Scanlon (Harvard) and Pamela Hieronymi (UCLA) will keynote.  The meeting will focus on themes in the moral philosophy of Rawls and Kant.  Conference information and the CFA can be found here.  Abstracts/paper proposals are due by June 15, 2012.

                                                              Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                We are pleased to announce you that a special issue of Public Reason, entitled ‘Public Services on the Market’ and edited by Rutger Claassen, is now available online at

                                                                http://www.publicreason.ro/cuprins/7

                                                                All articles are available for download as .pdf, .mobi, and .epub.

                                                                ARTICLES

                                                                Public Services on the Market: Issues and Arguments
                                                                Rutger Claassen (Leiden University)

                                                                Three Normative Models of the Welfare State
                                                                Joseph Heath (University of Toronto)

                                                                The State and the Market – A Parable: On the State’s Commodifying Effects
                                                                Tsilly Dagan (Bar Ilan University)
                                                                Talia Fisher (Tel Aviv University)

                                                                Political Philosophy and Public Service Broadcasting
                                                                Russell Keat (School of Social and Political Science, University of
                                                                Edinburgh)

                                                                Quasi-Market versus State Provision of Public Services:
                                                                Some Ethical Considerations
                                                                Julian Le Grand (London School of Economics)

                                                                The Commodification of the Public Service of Water:
                                                                A Normative Perspective
                                                                Adrian Walsh (University of New England)

                                                                Freedom of Choice and Freedom from Need
                                                                David P. Levine (Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University
                                                                of Denver)

                                                                The Marketization of Security Services
                                                                Rutger Claassen (Leiden University)

                                                                Public Reason is a peer-reviewed journal of political and moral philosophy.
                                                                Public Reason publishes articles, book reviews, as well as discussion notes
                                                                from all the fields of political philosophy and ethics, including political
                                                                theory, applied ethics, and legal philosophy. The Journal encourages the
                                                                debate around rationality in politics and ethics in the larger context of
                                                                the discussion concerning rationality as a philosophical problem.

                                                                Public Reason is committed to a pluralistic approach, promoting
                                                                interdisciplinary and original perspectives as long as the ideal of
                                                                critical arguing and clarity is respected. The journal is intended for the
                                                                international philosophical community, as well as for a broader public
                                                                interested in political and moral philosophy. It aims to promote
                                                                philosophical exchanges with a special emphasis on issues in, and
                                                                discussions on the Eastern European space.

                                                                Starting from 2010 Public Reason publishes two issues per year, in June and
                                                                December. Public Reason is an open access e-journal, but it is also
                                                                available in print.

                                                                Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                  Public Reason readers may be interested in two recent posts I contributed to the Experts’ Corner at Big Think:

                                                                  The Contraceptive Clash: Not About Religious Rights

                                                                  Santorum is No JFK: A Closer Look at Kennedy’s Speech

                                                                  – Steven Mazie 

                                                                  Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                    Tags: , , , , , , ,

                                                                    CUNY Graduate Center 2012-23 | Deadline: 12 April 2012

                                                                    This looks like a great postdoctoral fellowship associated with the Center for Global Ethics and Politics at CUNY GC:

                                                                    The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, the Ph.D. granting institution of CUNY, announces a postdoctoral fellowship for the academic year 2012-13 in the Political Science and/or Philosophy Ph.D. Program. The fellow’s area of research should be broadly related to the Mellon Sawyer Seminar Series to be held at the Graduate Center during that academic year on the theme “Democratic Citizenship and the Recognition of Cultural Differences.”

                                                                    The Sawyer Seminar Series, to be directed by Professors Carol Gould, Ruth O’Brien, Richard Wolin, and Omar Dahbour, will address the question of how democratic societies can be inclusive of a wide range of cultural practices and forms of expression while maintaining a commitment to respecting a secular public sphere, universal human rights, and women’s equality.  It is expected that the postdoctoral fellow will help to organize and lead the seminar series and will bring a relevant background in political theory, social and political philosophy, feminist theory, American political thought, and/or cultural studies.  The fellow will also have ample opportunity to pursue individual research related to one of the fields above.

                                                                    The position will begin on September 1, 2012.  Candidates must have a Ph.D. in one of the disciplines in the humanities or humanistic social sciences. Candidates who received the Ph.D in 2009 at the earliest, or who have completed the requirements for the Ph.D. by the application deadline, are eligible to apply.

                                                                    To apply, please email a letter of application, curriculum vitae, one sample publication or dissertation chapter, and the names and contact information for at least three references to sawyerpostdoc [at] gc.cuny.edu. The deadline for receipt of applications is April 12, 2012. Salary: $59,608 plus benefits.

                                                                    Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                      Following the success of our recent 50th Anniversary Chair and Reader appointments, the University of York intends to create up to twenty new Anniversary Research Lectureships. These posts are aimed at providing outstanding researchers with an opportunity for an extended period of research and a permanent career path.

                                                                      Anniversary Research Lecturers will spend a three year period strengthening their research profile, followed by a transfer to an established academic post, comprising teaching and research.

                                                                      These posts are open to all who hold a PhD in a relevant discipline, regardless of whether or not they already hold an established post elsewhere.

                                                                      Posts are available in a variety of departments, including Politics and Philosophy.

                                                                      Details are available via the University of York website here: http://bit.ly/ApynSh

                                                                      Any political philosophers or political theorists interested in applying for one of these positions is welcome to get in touch with Professor Matthew Festenstein (matthew.festenstein@york.ac.uk) and/or Dr Martin O’Neill (martin.oneill@york.ac.uk) to discuss the positions, and any questions they may have.

                                                                      Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                        CALL FOR PAPERS

                                                                        From faculty and graduate students

                                                                        SOCIETY FOR THE THEORY OF ETHICS AND POLITICS

                                                                        Northwestern University, 6th Annual Conference, May 17–19, 2012

                                                                        Keynote speakers:

                                                                        • Harry G. Frankfurt (Princeton)
                                                                        • T. M. Scanlon (Harvard)

                                                                        SUBMISSION GUIDELINES: We welcome submissions from faculty and graduate students, as some sessions will be reserved for student presentations. Please submit an essay of approximately 4000 words and an abstract of at most 150 words. Essay topics in all areas of ethical theory and political philosophy will be considered, although some priority will be given to essays that take up themes from the works of Harry Frankfurt and T. M. Scanlon. Essays and abstracts should be prepared for blind review in word, rtf, or pdf format.

                                                                        Graduate submissions should be sent by e-mail to Carlos Pereira Di Salvo<pereira.disalvo [at] u.northwestern.edu>; faculty submissions should be sent by e-mail to Kyla Ebels-Duggan <kebelsduggan [at] northwestern.edu>.

                                                                        EXTENDED DEADLINE: The deadline has been extended to March 1, 2012. Notices of acceptance will be sent by March 30, 2012. For more information, please contact Kyla Ebels-Duggan at the e-mail address above or visit the conference website: http://www.philosophy.northwestern.edu/conferences/moralpolitical/

                                                                        Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                          MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory – Ninth Annual Conference

                                                                          Manchester Centre for Political Theory (MANCEPT), University of Manchester, 5th – 7th September 2012

                                                                          WORKSHOP ON THE PROCEDURAL DIMENSION OF JUSTICE

                                                                          Convenor: Emanuela Ceva (University of Pavia)

                                                                          Can the procedures through which a society is structured be considered as inherently valuable as just? Or is justice to be thought to reside in their outcomes, to the achievement of which procedures are merely subservient? The workshop is designed to take issue with the widespread wariness of proceduralism as a justice-relevant approach to normativity. It has often been argued that procedure-related considerations are in fact reducible to outcome-related concerns – so procedures only have instrumental value depending on the qualities of the outcomes they produce. Failure to recognize this point would lead proceduralists, so the critique goes, to give no independent standard through which to assess the quality of outcomes, thus condemning agents to a ‘deaf and blind’ acceptance of any outcome and fostering an ‘anything goes’ attitude towards justice.

                                                                          Interestingly, such a generalized disregard of the inherent value of procedures in matters of justice does not seem to be matched by an equal lack of interest when the normative regard, as it were, moves from the justice of a polity to its legitimacy. Indeed, a number of studies defend procedural approaches to legitimacy, especially when it comes to accounting for the justification of authority in a democracy. The thought underlying such a double attitude towards proceduralism may be summarized as follows: whilst legitimacy has to do with the processes through which coercive political decisions are made, justice is more a ‘substantial’ matter concerning the moral justification of the terms of social cooperation, against which the qualities of the decisions made by those who have the authority to make them are to be evaluated. Accordingly, the argument goes, theorization about procedures seems to be more appropriate for issues of legitimacy than for those of justice.

                                                                          Is this really the only role that proceduralism may play in a normative theory of the social order? This workshop aims to investigate this general question by addressing such issues as:

                                                                          • Does it make any sense to theorize about the justice of procedures independently of the qualities of their outcomes?
                                                                          • Can procedures only have an instrumental value?
                                                                          • What is the relation between outcome-oriented theories of justice and procedural theories of legitimacy?
                                                                          • Should proceduralism about justice be understood as an alternative to outcome-theories or should it be viewed as a complement to them?

                                                                          If you would like to present a paper at this workshop, please send a 500-word abstract (or a full paper) to emanuela.ceva@unipv.it by 15 May 2012.

                                                                          Contributions are welcome from the fields of ethics, political philosophy/theory, history of political thought and legal philosophy.

                                                                          Conference website: http://manceptworkshops2012.wordpress.com/

                                                                          Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                            9th Annual MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory

                                                                            CFP: session on “Ideal and Nonideal Theory”

                                                                            Where: Manchester Centre for Political Theory, University of Manchester

                                                                            When: September 5-7, 2012

                                                                            Conference Organizers: Chris Mills (workshop administrator), Thomas Porter, Jonathan Quong, James Pattison, Stephen De Wijze

                                                                            Session Organizer: Marcus Arvan

                                                                            Deadline for submissions: June 1, 2012

                                                                            The MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory is an annual conference at the University of Manchester on selected topics in political theory. Each session will consist of a reading and discussion of 3-12 selected papers.  The present CFP invites full paper submissions for a session on “ideal” and “nonideal theory.” Potential paper topics include (but are by no means limited to) the following: What is the proper role of “ideal theorizing” in political theory?  How well do existing ideal theories apply to nonideal conditions?  Should nonideal theory be guided by, or independent of, ideal theory?  If nonideal theory should be guided by ideal theory, how?

                                                                            If you would like to present a paper in this session, please submit a full paper and abstract to marvan@ut.edu no later than June 1st, 2012. Please also include a separate cover sheet indicating your name, professional status (faculty, graduate student, independent researcher, etc.), and institutional affiliation. Papers may be of any length suitable for a peer-reviewed journal article. Please note that participants are responsible for seeking their own funding for travel/lodging/etc. For further details or questions, please contact marvan@ut.edu. Decision notices will be emailed by June 14th, 2012.

                                                                            Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                              Tags: , , , ,

                                                                              Greetings,

                                                                              Kansas State and Bogazici University are hosting a summer event on political philosophy this summer.  Graduate students and advanced undergraduates are invited to apply.  

                                                                              2012 International Summer School in Political Philosophy at Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey 

                                                                              July 9 to July 20, 2012 

                                                                              Liberalism, Libertarianism, and Democracy: Theory and Practice 

                                                                              This program will cover themes from contemporary liberal political philosophy. The first week will have a more theoretical orientation and the second week will have a more applied orientation. Topics will include: egalitarianism, classical liberalism, and libertarianism; desert and distributive justice; reparative justice and collective responsibility; non-ideal theory; constitutional reform in Turkey; secularism and political legitimacy; banning political parties; and more. Each instructor will offer multiple seminars and workshops, providing participants many opportunities to engage with instructors. Since some instructors will present work in progress for book projects, participants will be working through some of the most current topics in political philosophy. Participants will also have the opportunity to present their own work in progress. 

                                                                              Course Instructors: 

                                                                              Sam Freeman (University of Pennsylvania) 

                                                                              Erin Kelly (Tufts University) 

                                                                              Peter Niesen (TU Darmstadt) 

                                                                              David Schmidtz (University of Arizona) 

                                                                              Course Coordinators: 

                                                                              Amy Lara (Kansas State University) 

                                                                              Jon Mahoney (Kansas State University) 

                                                                              Lucas Thorpe (Bogazici University) 

                                                                              For more information, go to http://www-personal.ksu.edu/~alara/Turkey2012.html or email Jon Mahoney at jmahoney@ksu.edu 

                                                                              Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                                The Department of Philosophy at Saint Louis University will be hosting the Henle Conference on Happiness and Well-Being on March 30-31, 2012. A tentative schedule appears below.

                                                                                SCHEDULE

                                                                                Friday, March 30

                                                                                1:00 pm     Welcoming Remarks

                                                                                1:15 pm     Valerie Tiberius (University of Minnesota)
                                                                                “Right in the Middle: Normativity and Idealized Subjective Theories of Well-Being”
                                                                                Comments: David Sobel (University of Nebraska)

                                                                                2:55 pm     Coffee

                                                                                3:15 pm    Wade Memorial Lecture
                                                                                Richard Kraut (Northwestern University)
                                                                                “The Requirement of Neutrality and the Nature of Well-Being”

                                                                                5:00 pm     Reception

                                                                                6:00 pm     Dinner

                                                                                Saturday, March 31

                                                                                9:00 am     Tobias Hoffmann (Catholic University of America)
                                                                                “The Pleasure of Life and the Desire for Non-Existence: Some Medieval Theories”
                                                                                Comments: Chris Heathwood (University of Colorado)

                                                                                10:40 am    Coffee

                                                                                11:00 am    Peter Railton (University of Michigan)
                                                                                “Subjective Well-Being as Information”
                                                                                Comments: Michael Bishop (Florida State University)

                                                                                12:40 pm    Lunch

                                                                                2:40 pm      Nicole Hassoun (Carnegie Mellon University)
                                                                                “A Basic Needs Account of Human Rights?”
                                                                                Comments: Jennifer Hawkins (Duke University)

                                                                                4:20 pm     Coffee

                                                                                4:40 pm     Erik Angner (George Mason University)
                                                                                “Subjective Well-Being: When, and Why, It Matters”
                                                                                Comments: Laura Sizer (Hampshire College)

                                                                                6:20 pm     Free time

                                                                                7:00 pm     Dinner

                                                                                For details contact Dan Haybron (haybron@gmail.com). The conference website is: https://sites.google.com/site/danhaybron/henle-conference-on-happiness-and-well-being.

                                                                                The conference is free and open to the public, and will take place at the Chase Park Plaza Hotel in the Central West End neighborhood of St. Louis. No registration is required. (But we’d be happy to learn in advance if you are planning to come.)

                                                                                Be Sociable, Share!

                                                                                  « Older entries