I disagree, since this would seem to imply that the chronically poor cannot be self actualized, nor do they have strong social relationships, sense of self, sense of beauty, etc... because they are absolutely focused on the physical needs they are at risk of losing, or are deprived of by their economic condition... That without food and shelter security (things an increasing number of us lack) there cannot be morality, creativity, acceptance, or sense of purpose. I'm calling bullshit on that.
And while it's true that without any food, or without breathing, there isn't going to be much of the rest of that stuff going on, many of us, especially in today's economic environment, never achieve the level of security in basic needs that Maslow's theory states we need in order to have those other things, like sense of family, morality, and creativity.
I think we all have different hierarchy of needs as individuals: that our "needs" are based on our values, whether we focus on the immediate or can look beyond to provide for our future, and whether or not we see ourselves as having any higher aspirations than the immediate needs of our bodies. One thing that Maslow has on his hierarchy that I don't consider a need is sex, which is often listed in the basic physiological needs category. Sure, sex is necessary for the survival of the species, but it's not obligatory for any individual to continue his/her genetic makeup by procreating. In fact, if less people chose to procreate we'd be a lot better off as a world society. On the other hand, I acknowledge sex isn't just for procreation, in which case we'd have to bump it out of the social category and move it to recreation, which I suppose would be in the self actualization category.
Maslow rightly shows that if you're not eating or breathing, there's not much point in thinking about meaning in life, but I also feel if you're incapable of finding some meaning in life, there's not much point to going on eating and breathing.
My own personal hierarchy, which I admit isn't fully developed, places priority on future individual survival for an individual and living family... which excludes any need for procreation... and focuses on continued, not momentary survival.
I know, from years of blogging on several platforms (some of which no longer exist) that people really don't understand what motivates me, what I think is necessary and important to life, and my own hierarchy of needs. I hope this graphic will clear some of that up.
One of the things I've learned is that you can survive without security... that life holds no guarantees. If we were to wait for security in physical needs to go on to other things, we'd never achieve those other things. We'd have no capacity for hope for the future, no ability to love, no beauty in our lives. That's no way to live, and I don't think anyone truly lives that way. Even in the worst hardships, without creativity, hope, and purpose, there is no survival beyond the immediate. According to Maslow, few people reach self-actualization. It would be a sad commentary on humanity if that were true.