(, , or ;
Greek: ''logos'') is an important term in
philosophy,
psychology,
rhetoric and
religion. Originally a word meaning "a ground", "a plea", "an opinion", "an expectation", "word," "speech," "account," "reason," it became a technical term in philosophy, beginning with
Heraclitus (ca. 535–475 BC), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge.
Ancient philosophers used the term in different ways. The sophists used the term to mean discourse, and Aristotle applied the term to refer to "reasoned discourse" or "the argument" as relates to persuasive public speech in the field of rhetoric. The Stoic philosophers identified the term with the divine animating principle pervading the Universe.
After Judaism came under Hellenistic influence, Philo (ca. 20 BC–AD 40) adopted the term into Jewish philosophy. The Gospel of John identifies the Logos, through which all things are made, as divine (''theos''), and further identifies Jesus as the incarnation of the Logos.
Although the term "Logos" is widely used in this Christian sense, in academic circles it often refers to the various ancient Greek uses, or to post-Christian uses within contemporary philosophy, Sufism, and the analytical psychology of Carl Jung.
Etymology and linguistic issues
In ordinary, non-technical Greek, ''logos'' had a
semantic field extending beyond "
word" to notions such as, on the one hand, language, talk, statement, speech, conversation, tale, story, prose, proposition, and principle; and on the other hand, thought, reason, account, consideration, esteem, due relation, proportion, and analogy.
Despite the conventional translation as "word", it is not used for a word in the grammatical sense; instead, the term ''lexis'' (λέξις) was used. However, both ''logos'' and ''lexis'' derive from the same verb ''legō'' (λέγω), meaning "to count, tell, say, speak".
Philo distinguished between ''logos prophorikos'' (the uttered word) and the ''logos endiathetos'' (the word remaining within). The Stoics also spoke of the ''logos spermatikos'' (the generative principle of the Universe), which is not important in the Biblical tradition, but is relevant in Neoplatonism. Early translators from Greek, like Jerome in the 4th century, were frustrated by the inadequacy of any single Latin word to convey the Logos expressed in the Gospel of John. The Vulgate Bible usage of ''in principium erat verbum'' was thus constrained to use the perhaps inadequate noun ''verbum'' for word, but later romance language translations had the advantage of nouns such as ''le mot'' in French. Reformation translators took another approach. Martin Luther rejected ''Zeitwort'' (verb) in favor of ''Wort'' (word), for instance, although later commentators repeatedly turned to a more dynamic use involving ''the living word'' as felt by Jerome and Augustine.
In English, ''logos'' is the root of "logic," and of the "-logy" suffix (e.g., geology).
Ancient Greek philosophy
Heraclitus
The writing of
Heraclitus was the first place where the word ''logos'' was given special attention in ancient Greek philosophy, although Heraclitus seems to use the word with a meaning not significantly different from the way it was used in ordinary Greek of his time. For Heraclitus ''logos'' provided the link between rational discourse and the world's rational structure.
What logos means here is not certain: it may mean 'reason' or 'explanation' in the sense of an objective cosmic law; or it may signify nothing more than 'saying' or 'wisdom'. Yet, an independent existence of a universal ''logos'' was clearly suggested by Heraclitus.
Aristotle's rhetorical logos
Following one of the other meanings of the word, Aristotle, in the ''
Ars Rhetorica'', gave ''logos'' a different technical definition as argument from reason, one of the three
modes of persuasion (the other two modes are ''
pathos'' (), persuasion by means of emotional appeal: "putting the hearer into a certain frame of mind", and ''
ethos'' (), persuasion through convincing listeners of one's "moral character." According to Aristotle, ''logos'' relates to "the speech itself, in so far as it proves or seems to prove." In the words of Paul Rahe:
''Logos'', ''pathos'', and ''ethos'' can all be appropriate at different times. Arguments from reason (logical arguments) have some advantages, namely that data are (ostensibly) difficult to manipulate, so it is harder to argue against such an argument; and such arguments make the speaker look prepared and knowledgeable to the audience, enhancing ''ethos''. On the other hand, trust in the speaker, built through ''ethos'', enhances the appeal of arguments from reason.
Robert Wardy suggests that what Aristotle rejects in supporting the use of ''logos'' "is not emotional appeal per se, but rather emotional appeals that have no 'bearing on the issue,' in that the ''pathē'' they stimulate lack, or at any rate are not shown to possess, any intrinsic connection with the point at issue – as if an advocate were to try to whip an anti-Semitic audience into a fury because the accused is Jewish; or as if another in drumming up support for a politician were to exploit his listeners's reverential feelings for the politician's ancestors."
Stoics
In
Stoic philosophy, which began with
Zeno of Citium c. 300 BC, the ''logos'' was the active
reason pervading the
universe and animating it. It was conceived of as
material, and is usually identified with
God or
Nature. The Stoics also referred to the ''seminal logos'', ("''logos spermatikos''") or the law of generation in the universe, which was the principle of the active reason working in inanimate
matter.
Humans, too, each possess a portion of the divine ''logos''.
The Stoics took all activity to imply a Logos, or spiritual principle. As the operative principle of the world, to them, the Logos was ''anima mundi'', a concept which later influenced Philo of Alexandria, although he derived the contents of the term from Plato.
Logos in Hellenistic Judaism
In the
Septuagint the term ''logos'' is used for the word of God in the creation of heaven in Psalm 33:6, and in some related contexts.
Philo of Alexandria
Philo (20 BC – 50 AD), a Hellenized Jew, used the term Logos to mean an intermediary divine being, or
demiurge. Philo followed the Platonic distinction between
imperfect matter and perfect idea, and therefore intermediary beings were necessary to bridge the enormous gap between God and the material world. The Logos was the highest of these intermediary beings, and was called by Philo "the first-born of God."
Philo also wrote that "the Logos of the living God is the bond of everything, holding all things together and binding all the parts, and prevents them from being dissolved and separated."
The Platonic Ideas were located within the Logos, but the Logos also acted on behalf of God in the physical world. In particular, the Angel of the Lord in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) was identified with the Logos by Philo, who also said that the Logos was God's instrument in the creation of the universe.
Christianity
Christ the Logos
The Christian concept of the Logos is derived from the first chapter of the Gospel of John, where the Logos (often translated as “Word”) is described in terms that resemble, but likely surpass, the ideas of Philo:
John also explicitly identifies the Logos with Jesus:
Christians who profess belief in the Trinity often consider John 1:1 to be a central text in their belief that Jesus is God, in connection with the idea that the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are equals. As theologian Frank Stagg writes:
... Yet the Logos is in some sense distinguishable from God, for "the Logos was with God." God and the Logos are not two beings, and yet they are also not simply identical. ... The Logos is God active in creation, revelation, and redemption.|}}
"God" or "a god"
The last four words of John 1:1 (θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος, literally "God was the Logos," or "God was the Word") have been a particular topic of debate within Christianity. In this construct, the subject (the Logos) and the complement (God) both appear in the nominative case, and the complement is therefore usually distinguished by dropping any article, and moving it before the verb. Grammatically, the phrase could therefore read either "the Word was God" or "the Word was a god." Early New Testament manuscripts did not distinguish upper and lower case, so that pre-existing beliefs about the Trinity have influenced translation, although many scholars see the movement of "God" to the front of the clause as indicating an emphasis more consistent with "the Word was God." Some translations, such as An American Translation and Moffatt, New Translation, preserve a sense of ambiguity with "the Word was divine." Related translations have also been suggested, such as "what God was the Word also was."
While "the Word was God" is by far the most common English translation, non-Trinitarian groups such as the Jehovah's Witnesses (in the New World Translation and their edition of the Emphatic Diaglott) and Unitarians (in Thomas Belsham's modification of William Newcome's version) translate "the Word was a god."
Early Christian writers
Following John 1, the early Christian
apologist Justin Martyr (''c'' 150) identified Jesus as the Logos. Like
Philo, Justin also identified the Logos with the
Angel of the Lord, and used this as a way of arguing for Christianity to Jews:
In his ''First Apology'', Justin used the Stoic concept of the Logos as a way of arguing for Christianity to non-Jews. Since a Greek audience would accept this concept, his argument could concentrate on identifying this Logos with Jesus. However, Justin does not go so far as to articulate a fully consistent doctrine of the Logos.
Rhema and logos
The word logos has been used in different senses along with
Rhema. Both
Plato and
Aristotle used the term logos along with ''rhema'' to refer to sentences and propositions.
The Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek uses the terms Rhema and Logos as equivalents and uses both for the Hebrew word Dabar, as the Word of God.
Some modern usage in Christian Theology distinguishes Rhema from Logos (which here refers to the written scriptures) while Rhema refers to the revelation received by the reader from the Holy Spirit when the Word (Logos) is read, although this distinction has been criticized.
Neoplatonism
Neoplatonist philosophers such as Plotinus (204/5–270 AD) used the term "Logos" in ways which drew on Plato and the
Stoics. but the term Logos, was interpreted in different ways throughout Neoplatonism and similarities to Philo's concept of Logos appear to be accidental. The Logos was a key element in the
meditations of Plotinus regarded as the first Neoplatonist. Plotinus referred back to
Heraclitus and as far back as
Thales in interpreting Logos as the principle of meditation, existing as the interrelationship between the
Hypostases (The 'One', 'Spirit' (nous) and 'Soul').
Plotinus used a trinity concept that consisted of "The One", the "Spirit" and "Soul".
The comparison with the Christian Trinity is inescapable, but for Plotinus these were not equal and "The One" was at the highest level, with the "Soul" at the lowest. For Plotinus, the relationship between the three elements of his trinity is conducted by the outpouring of Logos from the higher principle, and ''eros'' (loving) upward from the lower principle. Plotinus relied heavily on the concept of Logos, but no explicit references to Christian thought can be found in his works, although there are significant traces of them in his doctrine. Plotinus specifically avoided using the term Logos to refer to the second person of his trinity. However, Plotinus influenced Victorinus who then influenced Augustine of Hippo. Centuries later, Carl Jung acknowledged the influence of Plotinus in his writings.
Victorinus differentiated between the Logos interior to God and the Logos related to the world by creation and salvation.
Augustine of Hippo, often seen as the father of medieval philosophy was also greatly influenced by Plato and is famous for his re-interpretation of Aristotle and Plato in the light of early Christian thought. A young Augustine experimented with, but failed to achieve ecstasy using the meditations of Plotinus. In his Confessions Augustine described Logos as the ''Divine Eternal Word''., by which he, in part, was able to motivate the early Christian thought throughout the Hellenisticly influenced world (among which the Latin speaking west) Augustine's Logos ''had taken body'' in Christ, the man in whom the logos (i.e. veritas or sepientia) was present as in no other man.
Sufism
The concept of Logos in Sufism is used to relate the "Uncreated" (God), to the "Created" (man). In Sufism, for the Deist, no contact between man and God can be possible without the Logos. The Logos is everywhere and always the same, but its personification is "unique" within each region. Jesus and Muhammad are seen as the personifications of the Logos, and this is what enables them to speak in such absolute terms.
One of the radical and boldest attempts to reformulate the Neoplatonic concepts into Sufism was due to the philosopher Ibn Arabi, who traveled widely in Spain and North Africa. His concepts were expressed in two major works ''The Ringstones of Wisdom'' (Fusus al-Hikam) and ''The Meccan Illuminations'' (Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya). To Ibn Arabi, every prophet corresponds to a reality which he called a Logos (Kalimah), as an aspect of the unique Divine Being. In his view the Divine Being would have for ever remained hidden, had it not been for the prophets, with Logos providing the link between man and divinity.
Ibn Arabi seems to have adopted his version of the Logos concept from Neoplatonic and Christian sources, although (writing in Arabic rather than Greek) he used more than twenty different terms when discussing it. For Ibn Arabi, the Logos or "Universal Man" was a mediating link between individual human beings and the divine essence.
Other Sufi writers also show the influence of the Neoplatonic Logos. In the 15th century ʻAbd al-Karim al-Jili introduced the ''Doctrine of Logos and the Perfect Man''. For al-Jili the ''perfect man'' (associated with the Logos or the Holy Prophet) has the power to assume different forms at different times, and appear in different guises.
Jung's analytical psychology
In
Carl Jung's analytical psychology, he contrasted a rational, decisive ''logos'' with an emotional ''mythos''. Jung contrasted the critical and rational faculties of logos with the emotional, non-reason oriented and mythical elements of ''mythos''. In Jung's approach logos vs mythos can be represented as "science vs mysticism", or "reason vs imagination" or "conscious activity vs the unconscious".
For Jung, logos represented the masculine principle of rationality, in contrast to its female counterpart, ''eros'':
Jung attempted to equate logos and eros, his intuitive conceptions of masculine and feminine consciousness, with the alchemical Sol and Luna. Jung commented that in a man the lunar anima and in a woman the solar animus has the greatest influence on consciousness. Jung often proceeded to analyze situations in terms of "paired opposites", e.g. by using the analogy with the eastern yin and yang and was also influenced by the Neoplatonics.
In his book ''Mysterium Coniunctionis'' Jung made some important final remarks about anima and animus:
In so far as the spirit is also a kind of "window on eternity"... it conveys to the soul a certain influx divinus... and the knowledge of a higher system of the world, wherein consists precisely its supposed animation of the soul.
And in this book Jung again emphasized that the animus compensates eros, while the anima compensates logos.
See also
Al-Insān al-Kāmil
Christianity
Dabar
Epeolatry
Logic
Logocracy
Nous
Parmenides
Rhema
Shabda
Sophia
Spirituality
References
External links
The Apologist's Bible Commentary
Category:Christian philosophy
Category:Christology
Category:Concepts in epistemology
Category:Greek loanwords
Category:Heraclitus
Category:Language
Category:Language and mysticism
Category:Philosophical terminology
Category:Rhetoric
Category:Singular God
Category:Stoicism
Category:Trinitarianism
Category:Names of God
af:Logos
ar:لوغوس
bs:Logos
br:Logos
ca:Logos
cs:Logos
cy:Logos
da:Appelform
de:Logos
et:Logos
es:Logos
eo:Logos
eu:Logos
fa:لوگوس
fr:Logos
ko:로고스
hr:Logos
id:Logos
it:Logos
he:לוגוס
kk:Логос
lt:Logosas
ml:ലോഗോസ്
arz:لوجوس
nl:Logos
ja:ロゴス
no:Logos
nn:Logos
pl:Logos (filozofia)
pt:Logos
ru:Логос
sk:Logos
sl:Logos
ckb:لۆگۆس
sr:Логос
sh:Logos
fi:Logos
sv:Logos
tr:Logos
uk:Логос
zh:邏各斯