2:34
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A3CnPaRphDs/0.jpg)
Will The Supreme Court End New York's Rent Control Laws?
Will The Supreme Court End New York's Rent Control Laws?
"If you wanted to destroy a city's housing - short of bombing - the best way to do it is rent control," says Cato legal associate Trevor Burrus. While most cities in America long ago got rid of rent control, New York remains a bastion of government-mandated limits on what landlords can charge renters. About 50 percent of New York's rental market is affected by rent control or rent stabilization, policies that keep rents artificially low and produce housing shortages, higher overall housing costs, and all sorts of corruption. The court case Harmon v. Kimmel may finally bring an end to rent control laws that have been on the books in one form or another since the 1940s. James D. Harmon owns a building in Manhattan where the tenants are paying rents that are about 60 percent below the going market rate. After losing various legal battles at lower levels, Harmon has petitioned the Supreme Court to hear his argument that rent stabilization is a form of takings that should be prohibited under the Constitution. The Court has not yet announced whether it will hear the case but has asked the state and city of New York to respond to Harmon's argument. Cato's Burrus wrote a friend of the court brief on the case and explains why rent control and rent stabilization are bad at promoting affordable housing and abridgments of economic freedom. About 2.34 minutes. Shot and edited by Joshua Swain. Go to www.reason.tv for downloadable versions, and subscribe to our YouTube Channel to <b>...</b>
6:53
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/W8fsuogyRjo/0.jpg)
SCOTUS: Strip Searches Legal For Any Arrest
SCOTUS: Strip Searches Legal For Any Arrest
Via New York Times - The Supreme Court on Monday ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails even if the officials have no reason to suspect the presence of contraband. Ana Kasparian and Cenk Uygur discuss the case, and give their reaction to the decision. www.nytimes.com www.salon.com Subscribe to The Young Turks: bit.ly Find out how to watch The Young Turks on Current by clicking here: www.current.com The Largest Online New Show in the World. Google+: www.gplus.to Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com
1:52
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xotgwAlefws/0.jpg)
"A Practical Guide to a Successful Quiet Title Action in New York Supreme Court," Rashida Maples
"A Practical Guide to a Successful Quiet Title Action in New York Supreme Court," Rashida Maples
Link to Lawline CLE Seminar: www.lawline.com Course Description: In a time when ownership and title in real property is constantly switching hands due to increased foreclosures and bank mergers, Quiet Title actions have been on the rise. Any gaps in the chain of title or interest in real property may cause severe problems for a lender who is trying to enforce the terms of a Mortgage or Deed of Trust. Join New York real estate practitioner Rashida Maples in this program that guides viewers through the process of bringing Quiet Title actions in New York. Ms. Maples introduces the applicable statutes, Article 15 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL), and discusses measures that lenders can take to prevent "clouded title" as well as the remedies available to them. She then walks her audience through Quiet Title actions -- explaining the various procedures that need to be followed and providing samples of the documents that need to be drafted. She concludes her presentation by providing tips on how to deal with common obstacles and lessons learned throughout her experience. This course will be helpful for attorneys who would like to learn how to bring Quiet Title actions in New York.
11:59
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HYAjrQjTMrE/0.jpg)
Shields, Brooks on Supreme Court 'High Tension,' Health Reform's Future
Shields, Brooks on Supreme Court 'High Tension,' Health Reform's Future
Syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks discuss the week's top political news including the Supreme Court's big week of hearings on health care reform, the validity of the law's individual mandate, the dangers of the Court evolving into a "political institution" and the Paul Ryan budget.
60:39
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/42pSCWSRRyQ/0.jpg)
Obamacare and the Supreme Court with Richard Epstein and John Yoo
Obamacare and the Supreme Court with Richard Epstein and John Yoo
Richard Epstein, the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law, New York University Law School, and John Yoo, a professor at the University of California at Berkeley law school, examine the merits of various constitutional arguments for the Supreme Court's striking down Obamacare.
4:05
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hwwFa320yJ8/0.jpg)
Man on the Lot - Supreme Court
Man on the Lot - Supreme Court
HeadCount's intrepid Man on the Lot Eric speaks with fans at Camp Bisco 8 in Mariaville, NY about the Supreme Court and its makeup. Much love to Hooper Molly for being such a good sport. For those interested, please see www.supremecourtus.gov for more information. Special Thanks to Codename for letting us use their live jam in the piece. http www.headcount.org www.headcount.org
34:28
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HTVvZ1Sdkaw/0.jpg)
Supreme Court Cases For Dummies
Supreme Court Cases For Dummies
First, you are not a dummy. Watch Mr. Hughes serve up a heaping helpful of Judicial Review designed to help you pass your tests and walking around a little smarter than when you started.
1:43
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ioV4S0fbwlk/0.jpg)
Michael Pollan: Supreme Court Campaign Finance Ruling "Not Good" for Food Safety
Michael Pollan: Supreme Court Campaign Finance Ruling "Not Good" for Food Safety
Complete video at: fora.tv Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto, expresses frustration over the recent Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission for eliminating limits on campaign spending by corporations. ----- Michael Pollan, one of the best-known names in food-related issues, offers a guide about health and food. Food Rules: An Eater's Manual is a set of memorable ideas for eating wisely. Many of them are drawn from a variety of ethnic or cultural traditions. Whether at the supermarket or an all-you-can-eat buffet, this handy, pocket-size resource is for people who would like to become more mindful of what they are eating. Pollan is the author of In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto, The Omnivore's Dilemma and The Botany of Desire. - Book Passage Michael Pollan is the author of The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals, a New York Times bestseller. His previous books include The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World (2001); A Place of My Own (1997); and Second Nature (1991). A contributing writer to The New York Times Magazine, Pollan is the recipient of numerous journalistic awards, including the James Beard Award for best magazine series in 2003 and the Reuters-IUCN 2000 Global Award for Environmental Journalism. Pollan served for many years as executive editor of Harper's Magazine and is now the Knight Professor of Science and Environmental Journalism at UC Berkeley. His <b>...</b>
76:36
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8ZpH7mAtREo/0.jpg)
Milbank Tweed Forum: Supreme Court Preview - The 2011-12 Term
Milbank Tweed Forum: Supreme Court Preview - The 2011-12 Term
Panelists: Adam Liptak, Supreme Court Correspondent, The New York Times Patricia Millett, Partner, Head of Supreme Court Practice, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Kannon Shanmugam, Partner, Williams & Connolly LLP Moderator: Barry Friedman, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Professor of Law The Supreme Court starts its new term on October 3rd, and the year has the potential to be a big one. The constitutionality of the "individual mandate" in the health care reform legislation may be headed to the Court soon on the strength of a newly created circuit split on the issue. Same-sex marriage could also appear on the docket, as lower courts continue to grapple with challenges to both the federal Defense of Marriage Act and California's Proposition 8. So too could Arizona's legislation regarding unlawful immigrants, as the state has appealed directly to the Supreme Court to overturn a Ninth Circuit injunction prohibiting enforcement of certain parts of the controversial SB1070. Other items on the docket include the constitutionality of the FCC's "fleeting expletive" ban; warrantless GPS tracking of criminal suspects; and the copyright status of thousands of creative works -- including some by JRR Tolkien and Alfred Hitchcock -- previously placed in the public domain.
56:54
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UTNbDjWpGxk/0.jpg)
Conversations With History: Reflections on the Supreme Court
Conversations With History: Reflections on the Supreme Court
Conversations host Harry Kreisler welcomes former New York Times reporter Linda Greenhouse. They discuss Roe v.Wade, the Guantanamo decisions, and her biography of Justice Harry Blackmun. Reflecting on her thirty year career covering the Supreme Court for the New York Times, she analyzes the internal dynamics of the Court and reflects on the Supreme Court's relations with other branches of government. Series: Conversations with History [11/2008] [Show ID: 15394]
9:55
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6QNvBNCppUk/0.jpg)
Thom Hartmann: Why Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas must be impeached
Thom Hartmann: Why Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas must be impeached
TJ McCormack, Conservative Commentator/Fox News Contributor joins Thom Hartmann. The New York Times reported last week that Justice Thomas is happily accepting generous favors from right-wing millionaire Harlan Crowe of Trammel Crowe construction fame and fortune. Along with giving millions of dollars to the Republican Party and right-wing hit groups like Swift Boat Veterans for Truth - Harlan Crowe has also lavished Justice Thomas with tens of thousands of dollars in gifts including a $15000 bible that once belonged to Frederick Douglass. Crowe also cut Justice Thomas' wife a half million-dollar check so that she could start her own Tea Party lobbying firm dedicated to repealing Obamacare - a case that her husband will likely decide when the Supreme Court determines the constitutionality of the health reform law in the coming months. So we can now add this misdeed to the laundry list of bad behavior by Justice Thomas - from unethical fundraising - to not disclosing his wife's right-wing income - to obvious conflicts of interest on the bench - all of which are clear violations of the federal code of conduct for judges. The remarkable thing about this story is that what Clarence Thomas is doing on the bench is far worse than what other Justices have been forced to resign for doing. Case in point - Judge Abe Fortas - an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court who was nominated by Lyndon Johnson to be the Chief Justice in 1968. But after it was uncovered that Fortas received <b>...</b>
3:31
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9Y4nwMI3Zcc/0.jpg)
Day 2 in Supreme Court Confirmation for Sonia Sotomayor
Day 2 in Supreme Court Confirmation for Sonia Sotomayor
US Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor faced tough questions from Republicans and friendly queries from Democrats in the second day of her confirmation hearings. The federal appellate judge is President Obama's choice to fill an opening on the high court. While even Republican senator say she is likely to win confirmation from lawmakers, the New York native faced questions early Tuesday [July 14th] about whether the approaches cases with any racial or ethnic bias. VOA's Carolyn Presutti brings us the highlights.
5:28
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6PS0BvkoVvA/0.jpg)
McCain and the Supreme Court - Jeffrey Toobin
McCain and the Supreme Court - Jeffrey Toobin
Complete video at: fora.tv CNN Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin examines John McCain's positions on the Supreme Court, and speculates as to what type of Justices McCain would appoint if elected President. ----- On July 7, Jeffrey Toobin delivers a lecture co-sponsored by the Jackson Center and Chautauqua Institution at the Institution's Hall of Philosophy on the United States Supreme Court. Mr. Toobin is a staff writer at The New Yorker and the senior legal analyst for CNN. His latest book, The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court, is a national bestseller - Robert H. Jackson Center Jeffrey Toobin is a CNN legal analyst for CNN Worldwide. Based in the network's New York bureau, Toobin joined CNN in April 2002.Toobin joined CNN from ABC News, where, during his seven-year tenure as a legal analyst, he provided legal analysis on the nation's most provocative and high profile cases, including the OJ Simpson civil trial and the Kenneth Starr investigation of the Clinton White House. Toobin received a 2000 Emmy Award for his coverage of the Elian Gonzales custody saga.Toobin remains a staff writer at The New Yorker where he has been covering legal affairs for the magazine since 1993. Previously, Toobin served as an assistant US attorney in Brooklyn. He also served as an associate counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh, an experience that provided the basis for his first book, Opening Arguments: A Young Lawyer's First Case - United States v <b>...</b>
5:31
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/N3n5yh83QNo/0.jpg)
MA Supreme Court Rules Police Should Not Bother Drivers Even If They Smell Marijuana!
MA Supreme Court Rules Police Should Not Bother Drivers Even If They Smell Marijuana!
HELP ME END MARIJUANA PROHIBITION BY RATING SHARING THESE VIDEOS LEGALIZE CANNABIS MEDICAL MARIHUANA WEED 420 HIGH OBAMA RON PAUL PIPE BONG JOINT KUSH DRUG WAR SEEDS News VAPORIZER BOWL HASHISH BLUNTS HASH GANJA HEMP legal cops POT PRIVACY CIVIL RIGHTS LAW ACTIVIST HERB smoke HIGHTIMES COLLAPSE MEXICAN CARTELS PATRIOTS MARYJANE conservative Libertarian Liberal NEW YORK JERSEY CHRONIC freedom ALEX JONES PRISON INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX toke Sinsemilla MSNBC CNN cbs fox wikileaks cancer ABC IAMHEMP420
10:18
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SQRSoVxsmq0/0.jpg)
Kevin Trudeau - Food Inc., Supreme Court, Tomato
Kevin Trudeau - Food Inc., Supreme Court, Tomato
Kevin Trudeau Show - 3-3-10 - Part 7 of 8 Topics: Food Inc., Supreme Court, Tomato Listeners have compared Kevin Trudeau's radio show to the best parts of Michael Savage, Howard Stern, Art Bell, John Tesh and Rush Limbaugh. Kevin Trudeau is one of the most read authors of all time. His books have all been best sellers and have sold over 30 million copies globally. Kevin's most controversial book, Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You to Know About was number 1 on the New York Times best sellers list for 26 weeks in a row becoming the best selling health book of all time. The Kevin Trudeau Radio Show originates from studios at Trudeau's World Headquarters in Chicago. Visit www.ktradionetwork.com for more information!
70:45
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_kcObTRFRQs/0.jpg)
2010 Supreme Court Preview - 9-29-10
2010 Supreme Court Preview - 9-29-10
October 4th marks the first day of the 2010 Supreme Court term. This term the Court will hear interesting cases concerning the Free Speech Clause, the Establishment Clause, privacy, preemption, arbitration, copyright, and more. Some notable cases include Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants, concerning a State's ability to restrict the sale of violent video games to minors and the First Amendment right to free speech; Snyder v. Phelps, concerning whether the First Amendment protects protesters at a military funeral from liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress on the family of the deceased; NASA v. Nelson, involving the extent to which the federal government may inquire into the backgrounds of employees of federal contractors; Chamber of Commerce v. Candelaria, involving Arizona's authority to enact a law governing the employment of illegal aliens; Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, concerning the constitutionality of tax credits for donations to school tuition groups; and Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, involving preemption of tort claims for a childhood vaccine. The panelists will also discuss how the addition of former Solicitor General Kagan may affect the Court. Panelists: --Hon. Paul D. Clement, Partner and Chair of Appellate Practice, King & Spalding LLP --Mr. Adam Liptak, Supreme Court Correspondent, The New York Times Prof. Jeffrey Rosen, Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School --Mr. Kannon K. Shanmugam, Partner <b>...</b>
3:35
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ENkffSeCgnM/0.jpg)
Fox on Atlantic Yards Eminent Domain Supreme Court Petition
Fox on Atlantic Yards Eminent Domain Supreme Court Petition
June 19 Fox Cable News broadcast on the cert petition filed with the Supreme Court on the Atlantic Yards eminent domain case. Jeffrey Finkle's comments at the end and the insinuation by the reporter that the plaintiffs are pawns of some agenda and receiving "freel legal counsel" are outright lies, but what would one expect from a guy whose first job out of school was working for Karl Rove. The courageous plaintiffs initiated and have pursued the lawsuit since October 2006. Their suit is financed by thousands of donations from their neighbors in Brooklyn and New York City, as well as themselves. Finkle should be ashamed of himself, but of course he isn't. Clearly it is he, as the head of the "International Economic Development Council" who has an extreme agenda.
10:00
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xljtXwgeXHQ/0.jpg)
"When the Supreme Court is not Supreme" Pt. 3
"When the Supreme Court is not Supreme" Pt. 3
On January 8, 2010, at the 12th Annual Faculty Conference in New Orleans, the Federalist Society provided an opportunity for legal scholars to give presentations on papers they had recently authored followed by commentary by Prof. Richard Epstein of the University of Chicago Law School and New York University Law School. In this segment Prof. Jason Mazzone of Brooklyn Law School presents his paper on When the Supreme Court is not Supreme. Prof. Nita Farahany of Vanderbilt University Law School moderates. Part 3 of 9
5:37
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zTqVyvMGo2U/0.jpg)
Gun Rights and the Supreme Court - Libertarian David Boaz
Gun Rights and the Supreme Court - Libertarian David Boaz
Complete video at: fora.tv Cato Institute Vice President David Boaz gives his opinion on gun rights in the United States, and discusses the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling on Heller v. District of Columbia - the 2008 overturning of the Washington, DC handgun ban. ----- A key figure in the libertarian movement, Boaz surveys what he sees as the threats to freedom from the Bush administration and the current presidential candidates. Though he is frustrated with many of the candidates' positions, he remains optimistic about the future of civil and economic liberties. But he says that the future of freedom requires that Americans devote considerable effort to preserving and protecting these rights - The Commonwealth Club of California Cato's executive vice president David Boaz has played a key role in the development of the Cato Institute and the libertarian movement. He is a provocative commentator and a leading authority on domestic issues such as education choice, drug legalization, the growth of government, and the rise of libertarianism. He is the author of Libertarianism: A Primer, described by the Los Angeles Times as "a well-researched manifesto of libertarian ideas," the editor of The Libertarian Reader, and coeditor of the Cato Handbook on Policy. Boaz is the former editor of New Guard magazine and was executive director of the Council for a Competitive Economy prior to joining Cato in 1981. His articles have been published in the Wall Street Journal, the New <b>...</b>
10:00
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gLDWT6Gkw9k/0.jpg)
PML-N Attacks Supreme Court Part 1
PML-N Attacks Supreme Court Part 1
See the champion of democracy the fathers of civil society PML-N Leaders Attack Supreme Court of Pakistan with there Jialas
9:56
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3GHVxMDRx6o/0.jpg)
Abolish Religious Exemptions from the Law? (Part 2)
Abolish Religious Exemptions from the Law? (Part 2)
UPDATE 6.28.10: The United States Supreme Court ruled against the Christian Legal Society ("CLS") in the case Christian Legal Society v. Martinez. The Court noted that CLS was not seeking "parity with other [student] organizations, but a preferential exemption from [the Law School's] policy." Exactly right! Excellent decision. Here's a link to the text of it: www.supremecourt.gov ----------------------- In the United States and other countries, religious institutions have traditionally enjoyed a privileged position, ie, they have been granted exemptions from compliance with certain laws (including, without limitation, laws against discrimination in employment and laws requiring the payment of taxes). Is it appropriate or even useful for religion to have this privileged status? Links: 1. Wisconsin Supreme Court's use of the "ministerial exception" to dismiss an age discrimination case against a Catholic school system www.wicourts.gov 2. New York Court of Appeals decision in Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Albany v. Serio www.law.cornell.edu 3. California Supreme Court's decision in Catholic Charities of Sacramento v. Superior Court (Unfortunately, I can't find a generally accessible URL for this decision. The citation is 85 P.3d 67 (2004).) 4. Jonathan Turley's Op-Ed piece entitled "When it comes to religious groups, who's really facing discrimination?" www.washingtonpost.com 5. Employment Division v. Smith www.law.cornell.edu 6. Bob Jones University v. United States <b>...</b>
3:18
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120421132006im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0GCsbvuMSBk/0.jpg)
NYPD Spies On Muslim College Students
NYPD Spies On Muslim College Students
A New York Police Department employee told the Associated Press that the NYPD has infiltrated Muslims groups on college campuses to prevent terror threats. Ana Kasparian and Cenk Uygur discuss. The Young Turks on Current TV: current.com The Largest Online New Show in the World. Google+: www.gplus.to Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com Support TYT for FREE: bit.ly