53% of @ are down to fight if they've got a numbers advantage, which is smart.
11% of @ are down to run around.
7% are total cowards.
28% are total jackasses, though not cowards.
Swarming isn't just about numbers, it's a specifically centerless and nonhierarchical form of organization with supposedly emergent properties. Even Leninists fetishize crowds, but they seek direction that comes from a single vision. Swarms don't really allow for that.
Member that one time we were doing this crime & like we were all "killa beeeeez ona swarm!" What? Repeat my self and enunciate? Ok, jake. What day was that? I don't know sometime in '01 I think.. What time? I don't know man, it was pretty fuckin late riiight?! Why are you asking me to repeat my name so much, bro?
what is phalanx, what is pincer? I'm waiting till i get all the facts to make an informed vote. I don't want to be to hasty. Thank you for your understanding.
Comments
make soap
...strategy should = list of things to buy from hardware store
put winona on the list
put winona on the list
'cept all of these are
'cept all of these are tactics. errrrr....
LIVE FOR THE SWARM
LIVE FOR THE SWARM
ok, so (at the time of
ok, so (at the time of writing):
53% of @ are down to fight if they've got a numbers advantage, which is smart.
11% of @ are down to run around.
7% are total cowards.
28% are total jackasses, though not cowards.
sounds about right
Swarming isn't just about
Swarming isn't just about numbers, it's a specifically centerless and nonhierarchical form of organization with supposedly emergent properties. Even Leninists fetishize crowds, but they seek direction that comes from a single vision. Swarms don't really allow for that.
killa beez
killa beez
Thought the same thing. Maybe
Thought the same thing. Maybe it shows our age.
dcsc!
dcsc!
Member that one time we were
Member that one time we were doing this crime & like we were all "killa beeeeez ona swarm!" What? Repeat my self and enunciate? Ok, jake. What day was that? I don't know sometime in '01 I think.. What time? I don't know man, it was pretty fuckin late riiight?! Why are you asking me to repeat my name so much, bro?
asl?
asl?
lolwut
lolwut
I'm not informed enough to vote on this survey.
what is phalanx, what is pincer? I'm waiting till i get all the facts to make an informed vote. I don't want to be to hasty. Thank you for your understanding.
keep waiting, wouldn't want
keep waiting, wouldn't want you to google it or anything, now would we?
this poll sucks take it down.
this poll sucks take it down.
or at least add winona to
or at least add winona to it!!
Phalanxes are imperial
Phalanxes are imperial fascist modes of organizing, swarms are da real deal. Wait, what are we being asked again?
Actually, all of these are
Actually, all of these are good strategies for @, except the phalanx.
seems like the atlanta action
seems like the atlanta action was a phalanx. surely context is relevant?
Unless they were using
Unless they were using spears, pikes, or sarissas, I think I would go with a different term.
But you're definitely right that context is relevant. It's hard to see why there would be a single "best strategy for @" in all contexts.
...
I think that formation has a different term because of mobility.
Society!
Society!