
- Order:
- Duration: 9:08
- Published: 06 Aug 2009
- Uploaded: 22 Mar 2011
- Author: GreekOrthodoxTV
The greatest Carolingian monarch was Charlemagne, who was crowned Emperor by Pope Leo III at Rome in 800. His empire, ostensibly a continuation of the Roman Empire, is referred to historiographically as the Carolingian Empire. The traditional Frankish (and Merovingian) practice of dividing inheritances among heirs was not given up by the Carolingian emperors, though the concept of the indivisibility of the Empire was also accepted. The Carolingians had the practice of making their sons (sub-)kings in the various regions (regna) of the Empire, which they would inherit on the death of their father. Following the death of Louis the Pious, the surviving adult Carolingians fought a three-year civil war ending only in the Treaty of Verdun, which divided the empire into three regna while according imperial status and a nominal lordship to Lothair I. The Carolingians differed markedly from the Merovingians in that they disallowed inheritance to illegitimate offspring, possibly in an effort to prevent infighting among heirs and assure a limit to the division of the realm. In the late ninth century, however, the lack of suitable adults among the Carolingians necessitated the rise of Arnulf of Carinthia, a bastard child of a legitimate Carolingian king.
The Carolingians were displaced in most of the regna of the Empire in 888. They ruled on in East Francia until 911 and they held the throne of West Francia intermittently until 987. Though they asserted their prerogative to rule, their hereditary, God-given right, and their usual alliance with the Church, they were unable to stem the principle of electoral monarchy and their propagandism failed them in the long run. Carolingian cadet branches continued to rule in Vermandois and Lower Lorraine after the last king died in 987, but they never sought thrones of principalities and made peace with the new ruling families. It is with the coronation of Robert II of France as junior co-ruler with his father, Hugh Capet, the first of the Capetian dynasty, that one chronicler of Sens dates the end of Carolingian rule.
The dynasty became extinct in the male line with the death of Odo, Count of Vermandois. His sister Adelaide, the last Carolingian, died in 1122.
Charles Martel (676–741) had five sons; :1. Carloman, Mayor of the Palace (711–754) had two sons; ::A. Drogo, Mayor of the Palace (b. 735) :2. Pepin the Short (714–768) had two sons; ::A. Charlemagne (747–814) had eight sons; :::I. Pepin the Hunchback (769–811) died without issue :::II. Charles the Younger (772–811) died without issue :::III. Pepin of Italy (773–810) had one son (illegitimate); ::::a. Bernard of Italy (797–818) had one son; :::::i. Pepin, Count of Vermandois (b. 815) had three sons; ::::::1. Bernard, Count of Laon (844–893) had one son; :::::::A. Roger I of Laon (d. 927) had one son; ::::::::I. Roger II of Laon (d. 942) died without male issue ::::::2. Pepin, Count of Senlis and Valois (846–893) had one son; :::::::A. Pepin II, Count of Senlis, (876–922) had one son; ::::::::I. Bernard of Senlis (919–947) had one son; :::::::::a. Robert I of Senlis (d. 1004) had one son; ::::::::::i. Robert II of Senlis and Peroone (d. 1028) died without male issue ::::::3. Herbert I, Count of Vermandois (848–907) had two sons; :::::::A. Herbert II, Count of Vermandois (884–943) had five sons; ::::::::I. Odo of Vermandois (910–946) died without issue ::::::::II. Herbert, Count of Meaux and of Troyes (b. 911–993) ::::::::III. Robert of Vermandois (d. 968) had one son; :::::::::a. Herbert III, Count of Meaux (950–995) had one son; ::::::::::i. Stephen I, Count of Troyes (d. 1020) died without issue ::::::::IV. Adalbert I, Count of Vermandois (916–988) had four sons; :::::::::a. Herbert III, Count of Vermandois (953–1015) had three sons; ::::::::::i. Adalbert II of Vermandois (c.980–1015) ::::::::::ii. Landulf, Bishop of Noyon ::::::::::iii. Otto, Count of Vermandois (979–1045) had three sons; :::::::::::1. Herbert IV, Count of Vermandois (1028–1080) had one son; ::::::::::::A. Odo the Insane, Count of Vermandois (d. after 1085) ::::::::::::B. Adelaide, Countess of Vermandois (d. 1122) :::::::::::2.Eudes I, Count of Ham, (b. 1034) :::::::::::3.Peter, Count of Vermandois :::::::::b. Odo of Vermandois (c. 956-983) :::::::::c. Liudolfe of Noyon (c. 957-986) :::::::::d. Guy of Vermandois, Count of Soissons ::::::::V. Hugh of Vermandois, Archbishop of Rheims (920-962) died without issue :::::::B. Berenger of Vermandois, Count of Bayeaux whose grandson was Conan I of Rennes :::IV. Louis the Pious (778–840) had 4 sons; ::::a. Lothair I (795–855) had 4 sons; :::::i. Louis II of Italy (825–875) died without male issue :::::ii. Lothair II of Lotharingia (835–869) had 1 son (illegitimate); ::::::1. Hugh, Duke of Alsace (855–895) died without issue :::::iii. Charles of Provence (845–863) died without issue :::::iv. Carloman (b. 853) died in infancy ::::b. Pepin I of Aquitaine (797–838) had 2 sons; :::::i. Pepin II of Aquitaine (823–864) died without issue :::::ii. Charles, Archbishop of Mainz (828–863) died without issue ::::c. Louis the German (806–876) had 3 sons; :::::i. Carloman of Bavaria (830–880) had 1 son (illegitimate); ::::::1. Arnulf of Carinthia (850–899) had 3 sons; :::::::A. Louis the Child (893–911) died without issue :::::::B. Zwentibold (870–900) died without issue :::::::C. Ratold of Italy (889–929) died without issue :::::ii. Louis the Younger (835–882) had 1 son; ::::::1. Louis (877 - 879) died in infancy :::::iii. Charles the Fat (839–888) had 1 son (illegitimate); ::::::1. Bernard (son of Charles the Fat) (d. 892 young) ::::d. Charles the Bald (823–877) had 4 sons; :::::i. Louis the Stammerer (846–879) had 3 sons; ::::::1. Louis III of France (863–882) died without issue ::::::2. Carloman II of France (866–884) died without issue ::::::3. Charles the Simple (879–929) had one son; :::::::A. Louis IV of France (920–954) had five sons; ::::::::I. Lothair of France (941–986) had two sons; :::::::::a. Louis V of France (967–987) died without issue :::::::::b. Arnulf, Archbishop of Reims (d. 1021) died without issue ::::::::II. Carloman (b. 945) died in infancy ::::::::III. Louis (b. 948) died in infancy ::::::::IV. Charles, Duke of Lower Lorraine (953–993) had 3 sons; :::::::::a. Otto, Duke of Lower Lorraine (970–1012) died without issue :::::::::b. Louis of Lower Lorraine (980–1015) died without issue, the last legitimate Carolingian :::::::::c. Charles (b. 989) died young ::::::::V. Henry (b. 953) died in infancy :::::ii. Charles the Child (847–866) died without issue :::::iii. Lothar (848–865) died without issue :::::iv. Carloman, son of Charles the Bald (849–874) died without issue :::V. Lothair (778–780) died in infancy :::VI. Drogo of Metz (801–855) died without issue :::VII. Hugh, son of Charlemagne (802–844) died without male issue :::VIII. Dietrich (Theodricum) (807-818)died without male issue ::B. Carloman I (751–771) died without issue :3. Grifo (726–753) died without issue :4. Bernard, son of Charles Martel (730–787) had two sons; ::A. Adalard of Corbie (751–827) died without issue ::B. Wala of Corbie (755–836) died without issue :5. Remigius of Rouen (d. 771) died without issue
Category:Carolingian period Category:History of the Germanic peoples Category:Early Middle Ages Category:Christianity of the Middle Ages
This text is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA License. This text was originally published on Wikipedia and was developed by the Wikipedia community.
He also became prominent in the nonviolent resistance to the Germans who occupied Belgium in World War I.
Henri Pirenne's reputation today rests on three contributions to European history: for what has become known as the Pirenne Thesis, concerning origins of the Middle Ages in reactive state formation and shifts in trade; for a distinctive view of Belgium's medieval history; and for his model of the development of the medieval city.
Pirenne argued that profound, long-term social, economic, cultural, and religious movements resulted from profound underlying causes, and this attitude influenced Marc Bloch and the outlook of the French Annales School of social history.
In brief, the Pirenne Thesis notes that in the ninth century long-distance trading was at a low ebb; the only settlements that were not purely agricultural were the ecclesiastical, military and administrative centres that served the feudal ruling classes as fortresses, episcopal seats, abbeys and occasional royal residences of the peripatetic palatium. When trade revived in the late tenth and eleventh centuries, merchants and artisans were drawn to the existing centres, forming suburbs in which trade and manufactures were concentrated. These were "new men" outside the feudal structure, living on the peripheries of the established order. The feudal core remained static and inert. A time came when the developing merchant class was strong enough to throw off feudal obligations or to buy out the prerogatives of the old order, which Pirenne contrasted with the new element in numerous ways. The leaders among the mercantile class formed a bourgeois patriciate, in whose hands economic and political power came to be concentrated.
Pirenne's thesis takes as axiomatic that the natural interests of the feudal nobility and of the urban patriciate, which came to well-attested frictions in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, were in their origins incompatible. This aspect of his thesis has been challenged in detail.
Traditionally, historians have dated the Middle Ages from the fall of the Roman Empire in the 5th century, a theory Edward Gibbon famously put forward in the 18th century. Pirenne challenged the notion that Germanic barbarians had caused the Roman Empire to end and he challenged the notion that the end of the Roman Empire should be equated with the end of the office of emperor in Europe, which occurred in 476. He pointed out the essential continuity of the economy of the Roman Mediterranean even after the barbarian invasions, and that the Roman way of doing things did not fundamentally change in the time immediately after the "fall" of Rome. Barbarians came to Rome not to destroy it, but to take part in its benefits; they tried to preserve the Roman way of life.
Pirenne used statistical data regarding money in support of his thesis. Much of his argument builds upon the disappearance from western Europe of items that had to come from outside. For example, the minting of gold coins north of the Alps stopped after the 7th century, indicating a loss of access to wealthier parts of the world. Papyrus, made only in Egypt, no longer appeared north of the Alps after the 7th century: writing reverted to using animal skins, indicating an isolation from wealthier areas.
In a summary, he famously said, "Without Islam, the Frankish Empire would have probably never existed, and Charlemagne, without Muhammad, would be inconceivable." That is, he rejected the notion that barbarian invasions in the 4th and 5th centuries caused the collapse of the Roman Empire. Instead, the Muslim conquest of north Africa made the Mediterranean a barrier, cutting western Europe off from the east, enabling the Carolingians, especially Charlemagne, to create a new, distinctly western form of government.
Pirenne's Thesis has not entirely convinced all historians of the period. One does not have to entirely accept or deny his theory. It has provided useful tools for understanding the period of the Early Middle Ages, and a valuable example of how periodization schemes are provisional, never axiomatic.
Pirenne's Histoire de Belgique (7 vol., 1899–1932) stressed how traditional and economic forces had drawn Flemings and Walloons together. Pirenne, inspired by patriotic nationalism, presupposed a Belgian unity - social, political, and ethnic - which predated its 1830 independence by centuries. Although a liberal himself, he wrote his seven-volume history with such a masterly balance that Catholics, liberals and socialists could quote from it with equal respect in their newspapers or sometimes even in their political gatherings.
He argued that capitalism originated in Europe's cities, as did democracy. His "Merchant Enterprise School" opposed Marxism but shared many of Marx's ideas on the merchant class. Pirenne's theory of a commercial renaissance in towns in the 11th century remains the standard interpretation.
Pirenne was held in Crefeld, then in Holzminden, and finally in Jena, where he was interned from 24 August 1916 until the end of the war. He was denied books, but he learned Russian from soldiers captured on the Eastern Front and subsequently read Russian-language histories made available to him by Russian prisoners. This gave Pirenne's work a unique perspective. At Jena, he began his history of medieval Europe, starting with the fall of Rome. He wrote completely from memory. Rather than a blow-by-blow chronology of wars, dynasties and incidents, A History of Europe presents a big-picture approach to social, political and mercantile trends. It is remarkable not only for its historical insight, but also its objectivity, especially considering the conditions under which it was written.
At the conclusion of the war, Henry Pirenne stopped his work on A History of Europe in the middle of the 16th century. He returned home and took up his life. At the time of his death in 1935, Pirenne's son Jacques Pirenne, who had survived the war to become a historian in his own right, discovered the manuscript. He edited the work by inserting dates for which his father was uncertain in parentheses. Jacques wrote a preface explaining its provenance and published it, with the English translation appearing in 1956. It stands as a monumental intellectual achievement.
Category:1862 births Category:1935 deaths Category:Belgian historians Category:Belgian scientists Category:Medievalists Category:Walloon people Category:Ghent University alumni
This text is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA License. This text was originally published on Wikipedia and was developed by the Wikipedia community.