Archive for the 'Academia' Category

Resistance Studies Seminar: Skolan som en arena för motstånd

Stellan Vinthagen November 24th, 2011

Alla intresserade är välkomna till Motståndsseminarium torsdag den 8 dec 2011.

Sven-Eric Liedman, pensionerad professor i idéhistoria ger ett motståndsseminarium på Annedalsseminariet, Institutionen för Globala Studier, Campus Linné, www.globalstudies.gu.se i Sal 220, kl 15:15-17.00. Som vanligt så samlas vi på Gyllene Prag för en bit mat och fortsatta samtal efteråt.

Titel: “Skolan som en arena för motstånd”
Skolsystemet från förskola till universitet är alltid en plats för ständigt kämpande intressen. Just nu styr kravet på att skolan ska förbereda unga människor för en snabb och gränslös marknad, där effektivitet är nyckelordet. Det väsentliga blir då kunskaper i sådant som betraktas som viktigt för ett marknadsliv: matematik, språk, framför allt engelska, men också vad som kallas social kompetens. Begreppet “social kompetens” är värt en särskild eftertanke. Det betecknar i allmänhet en förmåga att umgås med andra människor, vara inkännande men inte kravlös. Men lätt insmyger sig också en nyans av medgörlighet, framför allt den underordnades medgörlighet och kritiklöshet gentemot den överordnade, den anställdes gentemot företaget eller institutionen. Social kompetens kan i så fall urata till kritiklöshet.

För egen del kämpar jag för en skola, och i mitt fall framför allt ett universitet, där ifrågasättandet är i högsätet. Orättvisor på nära håll liksom i ett världsperspektiv kommer då i fokus. Den tilltagande segregationen också i ett land som Sverige måste komma i fokus, liksom givetvis hela den globala snedfördelningen (det hör ju till saken att världen i dag finns i Sverige på ett annat sätt än för femtio år sen). En avgöraned aspekt av detta är också hushållningen med naturens resurser. Det måste inskärpas att människan redan genom sin egen kropp är en del av naturen.

Det betyder inte alls att matematik eller engelska eller några andra skolämnen blir mindre viktiga. Det betyder att attityden till både kunskap och omvärld förändras. Det gäller inte att smälta in utan att få en kritisk inställning till den dominerande utvecklingen.

Resistance Studies Seminars, Gothenburg, Fall Schedule 2011

Stellan Vinthagen September 15th, 2011

Welcome to the new schedule for resistance studies seminars at Gothenburg university!

We are this semester, as before, offering a meeting place for critical discussions on resistance, from various perspectives and by different seminar presenters. Everyone that is interested in critical discussions on resistance is welcome: researchers, students, activists, journalists, authors, or others that find the themes interesting.The seminars are at Campus Linné, see a map at www.globalstudies.gu.se or directly at this link.

If you want to get regular emails about the coming program of seminars, let our seminar organizer Per Ström know you are interested: email (without the spaces between letters) per. strom @ yahoo. se

We start early with an extra seminar already on September 22 with Professor Evelina Dagnino, from Campinas University, Brazil on “Civil society: theoretical challenges and practical dilemmas from a Latin American perspective”. Seminar is in English. Thursday 15:15-17 at the A-building in room A-206 (see map). The seminar is organized with the help of Associate Professor Edmé Dominguez at School of Global Studies. If you have questions about this seminar, please email directly to Edmé: edme. dominguez @ globalstudies. gu. se

September 29 with Paul Routledge, Reader at University of Glasgow. He will talk on “Climate Justice as Alterhegemony: The Case of the landless movement in Bangladesh”. Seminar is in English. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalsseminariet (Room 303).

September 27 with Irene Molina, Docent i kulturgeografi, Uppsala Universitet och medlem i ArA, Föreningen Antitrasistiska akademin. “Förorten och det symboliska politiska våldet”. Seminar are in Swedish. Tuesday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 303.

October 13 with Ramzi Abdou, Palestinian Youth Activist, Student in Political science from Gaza University. United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East “UNRWA” in GAZA. “Culture of Resistance vs. Defeat”. Seminar are in English. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 303.

October 27 with Mathias Wåg, Redaktör för antologin I stundens hetta och ansvarig utgivare för tidningen Brand. “I stundens hetta – Svarta block, vita overaller och osynliga partier”. Seminar are in Swedish. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 419.

November 10 with Paulina de los Reyes, professor i ekonomisk historia och verksam vid Ekonomisk Historiska Institutionen, Stockholms Universitet. “Intersektionalitet, makt och motstånd”. Seminar are in Swedish. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 303.

November 24 with Elin Andersson, aktivist och freelansjournalist. “Är det verkligen fred vi vill ha? – om risken för ett nytt krig om ockuperade Västsahara”. Seminar are in English or possible Swedish. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 303.

December 8 with Sven-Eric Liedman, professor i Idé- och lärdomshistoria vid Göteborgs Universitet. “Hets – marknadsliberala skola med konservativa ideal”. Seminar are in Swedish. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet, hörsal.

Call for papers: Resistance Studies Panel at ISA, San Diego, 2012

Stellan Vinthagen May 12th, 2011

Dear Resistance Researchers,

We are planning to organise a resistance studies panel at the International Studies Assocation (ISA) in San Diego  2012 (see http://www.isanet.org). Organisers of the panel are Mona Lilja and Stellan Vinthagen. The plan is: (1) to discuss resistance studies (2) to meet each other live! (3) to make our work known for others who might be interested. So, if you think this is interesting, join us! Send your abstracts (with title) to Stellan Vinthagen (stellan[dot]vinthagen[at]gmail[dot]com) at the LATEST the 22 May, and then we will put up the panel and connect your paper to the panel. If many people submit papers we register the ones we get first.

However, we are also planning to have meeting and dinner during the same day as our panel, and all will be invited to this that show interest.

All the best,

Mona Lilja and Stellan Vinthagen

Extra Seminar: Genome Hackers

Stellan Vinthagen May 2nd, 2011

Extra seminar with resistance relevance:

Genome Hackers: How amateur biologists are challenging Big Bio and making Dna hackable Seminar, Friday 6th May, 10:00-12:00, rum F417, Skanstorget 18, Gothenburg

Alessandro Delfanti is a PhD candidate in Science and Society at the  University of Milan and the International School for Advanced Studies. He has been a visiting fellow at the UCLA Center for Society and Genetics in Los Angeles. His research interests are related to open access and open source and how these practices interact with scientists’ cultures and the socioeconomic configuration of contemporary biology. Alessandro also tackles science, intellectual property and today’s
capitalism as a journalist and a political activist. He teaches Sociology of New Media and is an editor of the open access Journal of Science Communication. Genome Hackers is the title of his PhD dissertation.

COP: A Living Movement: Toward a World of Peace, Solidarity, and Justice

Stellan Vinthagen April 5th, 2011

Joint Conference of PJSA and the Gandhi King Conference

Hosted by the Christian Brothers University, Memphis, TN ~ October 21-23, 2011


The Peace and Justice Studies Association and The Gandhi-King Conference

Jointly present a dynamic conference experience:

“A Living Movement: Toward a World of Peace, Solidarity, and Justice”

The Peace & Justice Studies Association (PJSA) and the Gandhi-King Conference (GKC) are pleased to announce our first-ever jointly sponsored annual conference. The PJSA and the GKC are partnering this year to promote dynamic exchange among individuals and organizations working for a more just and peaceful world. This partnership promises a unique conference experience that combines the best of scholarly and grassroots perspectives on the pressing justice issues in our communities and around the globe.

We invite submissions for the 2011 Annual Conference, to be held on the campus of Christian Brothers University, in Memphis, Tennessee, from Friday October 21 through Sunday October 23, 2011. We welcome proposals from a wide range of disciplines, professions, and perspectives that address issues related to the broad themes of solidarity, community, advocacy, education, and activism as they are brought to bear in the pursuit of peace and justice.

Our goal is to create a stimulating environment where scholars, activists, educators, practitioners, artists, and students can build community and explore interconnections. We invite participants to engage in various modes of exploration, including papers and presentations, hands-on practitioner workshops, and a youth summit. We aim to foster an experience in which attendees will have multiple opportunities to meet and dialogue in both formal and informal settings, against the unique historical backdrop of Memphis, TN.

The deadline for proposal submissions is April 15, 2011. Abstracts are limited to 150 words, and must be submitted electronically through the PJSA website.

For more information, contact: info@peacejusticestudies.org or info@gandhikingconference.org

COP: Nonviolent Civil Resistance

Stellan Vinthagen April 5th, 2011

Call for Papers (Please forward and distribute widely)

Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change volume 34

Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, a peer-reviewed volume published by Emerald Group Publishing, encourages submissions for Volume 34 of the series. This volume will have a thematic focus on nonviolent civil resistance and will be guest edited by Lester Kurtz (George Mason University) and Sharon Erickson Nepstad (University of New Mexico). We encourage submissions on the following topics: variations of nonviolent strategies, the effects of repression on nonviolent movements, reasons for the recent rise of nonviolent revolutions, factors shaping the outcome of nonviolent struggles, and the international diffusion of nonviolent methods.

Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (RSMCC) is a fully peer-reviewed series of original research that has been published annually for over 30 years. We continue to publish the work of many of the leading scholars in social movements, social change, and peace and conflict studies. Although RSMCC enjoys a wide library subscription base for the book versions, all volumes are now published both in book form and are also available online to subscribing libraries through Emerald Insight. This ensures wider distribution and easier online access to your scholarship while maintaining the esteemed book series at the same time.

RSMCC boasts quick turn-around times, generally communicating peer reviewed-informed decisions within 10-12 weeks of receipt of submissions.

Submission guidelines

To be considered for inclusion in Volume 34, papers should arrive by October 1, 2011.

Send submissions as a WORD document attached to an email to BOTH Lester Kurtz and Sharon Erickson Nepstad, guest RSMCC editors for Volume 34, at lkurtz (at) gmu (dot) edu and nepstad (at) unm (dot) edu. Remove all self-references (in text and in bibliography) save for on the title page, which should include full contact information for all authors.

  • Include the paper’s title and the abstract on the first page of the text itself.
  • For initial submissions, any standard social science in-text citation and bibliographic system is acceptable.

For more information, please visit the RSMCC homepage.

Please forward and distribute widely.

SSU professor: Egypt revolt not spontaneous

jj March 15th, 2011

By JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Cynthia Boaz

Cynthia Boaz

Observers worldwide were captivated in February as millions of Egyptians overthrew President Hosni Mubarek, who has been in power since 1981. Many also described it as spontaneous.

It wasn’t, said Cynthia Boaz, a political scientist at Sonoma State University.

She met with some of the students who became its leaders in 2008, at a workshop co-organized by the Washington-based nonprofit where she is a paid consultant, the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.

They discussed the lessons and methods of nonviolent mass civil resistance, and the skills it requires.

Boaz remains in contact with them and said that what is now known as the January 25 Movement, while sparked by a similar revolt in Tunisia, was anything but impromptu.

“I didn’t know they were planning … to start on Jan. 25,” she said, “but I knew the movement had planned for a major action. It’s an organized, planned, disciplined movement.”

Despite the scattered violence that continues, the revolution was overwhelmingly peaceful, waged not with weapons but with voices and placards and mass gatherings.

Boaz, 40, is an expert in nonviolent struggle who consults with educators, activists and students from countries ranging from Spain to Iran. She said toppling repressive regimes is a milestone in the capacity of organized civil resistance movements.

“What happened in Egypt represents a systemwide demand for a new alternative,” she said. “It’s not just about removing the old system from power.

“It was important to get something new for Egyptians, and that really is about democracy.”

Some of the effects are already evident in the largely peaceful protests happening across the Middle East in countries from Bahrain to Yemen.

“It isn’t like these movements have emerged overnight. They’ve just been waiting for an opportunity,” Boaz said.

Libya is an exception because “it’s not organized, there’s not a coherent, unified message,” she said. “It’s not disciplined, and it’s not non-violent.”

Egyptian activists worked for years to identify and neutralize the sources of power in the nation of 83 million. Their effort extended to having coffee with members of the Army.

“It’s a very nuanced divide and conquer strategy,” Boaz said. “You genuinely build real relationships with people, and you begin to help them question the legitimacy of the ruler and the system they’re upholding.”

—–O—–

With the events in the Middle East, Cynthia Boaz is in demand. Before flying to Chile Friday to meet with Latin American diplomats, she talked with The Press Democrat about Egypt’s revolution.

Q: What took place in Egypt has variously been termed a revolt, an uprising, a revolution. Which would you use?

A: Revolution. When power shifted from the regime to the people, that’s what made it a “revolution.”

Q: The revolution is often described as a spontaneous event ignited by the events in Tunisia. To what degree was it organized and why does it matter?

A: This question represents a common and unfortunate misconception about nonviolent action, which is that when you see it, it’s ad-hoc, it’s spontaneous; people just decide to show up in the city square and protest.

But that takes away credit from the activists. When nonviolence succeeds … it’s planned, organized and disciplined.

Q: But doesn’t the suddenness of these events, and how they took place almost simultaneously in these countries, signify a degree of spontaneity?

A: The disaffection and frustration that people feel is long term, so in many of these cases there will be a spark that ignites a population to action.

But that doesn’t mean it’s spontaneous. It means that there may be a movement waiting for a strategic moment in time.

Q: Is it significant that the Egyptian revolution was largely nonviolent?

A: What’s won through violence has to be sustained through violence, so the only truly legitimate way to create democracy is through a bottom-up, nonviolent process.

Also, the long-term consequences of a nonviolent victory in Egypt are that it really increases the credibility of nonviolence.

Young people who are natural bases of recruitment by terrorist organizations are now seeing another option for pushing their grievances — nonviolence.

Q: Regarding legitimacy, what about the American Revolution?

A: Mass non-violent action is relatively new, since the beginning of the 20th Century. It was really perfected by Ghandi …and (the Egyptians) were also looking at Eastern Europe and what happened there in Serbia and Ukraine.

Q: Of the students you know, are any members of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is expected to play a role in Egypt’s next election?

A: No. In fact, they are very clear that the movement’s goals and objectives are secular.

See the debate following the publication of this text and the corrections made by Cynthia Boaz at the bottom of this article

Uproar in Egypt over ElBaradei Death Fatwa

jj December 21st, 2010

From asharq alawsat By Waleed Abdul Rahman

Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei

Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei

Cairo, Asharq Al-Awsat – A fatwa issued in Egypt calling for the death of Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, former Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] and Egyptian political opposition figure, has stirred religious and political controversy across Egypt. Al-Azhar scholars have described this Fatwa as being “reckless” whilst supporters of ElBaredei – who is considering standing for the Egyptian presidential elections next year – have condemned this fatwa which was issued by Sheikh Mahmoud Amer, head of the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya association in Damanhur governorate. This fatwa justified the murder of Dr. ElBaradei for “stirring civil disobedience against the regime of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, inciting riots and calling for full-scale civil disobedience.”

In a fatwa posted on the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya website, Sheikh Amer began by stating that “we, in Egypt, are a people that for the most part follow the religion of Islam and anybody reading ElBaradei’s statements can see that these call for civil disobedience and incite civil unrest against our Muslim ruler [President Hosni Mubarak].” The fatwa goes on to say that “regardless of the status of Egypt’s ruler in the eyes of some people, he is the ruler and so should be listened to and obeyed…therefore ElBaradei and others are not entitled to make such statements [calling for civil disobedience].” Sheikh Mahmoud Amer’s fatwa uses some of the prophet’s hadith as well as some of the teachings of Salafist clerics as a reference, with the fatwa calling on ElBaradei to “declare his repentance for what he has said…otherwise the ruler is permitted to imprison or kill him in order to prevent sedition.”

Asharq Al-Awsat spoke to the man responsible for the above fatwa, leader of the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya association in Damanhur governorate, Sheikh Mahmoud Amer, who said that “what was published on the group’s website represents the Shariaa ruling of the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya association in Damanhur governorate members on ElBaradei’s position.”

In response to a question as to whether other branches of the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya group in Egypt support his fatwa, he confirmed that “no branch of the association is entitled to be the guardian of another, only the Egyptian government is permitted to do so. The Damanhur branch enjoys complete independence, and the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya association headquarters in Cairo has no authority over this branch or any other branch of the organization, as stipulated by our rules and regulations.”

For his part, Dr. Abdul Mouti Bayoumi of the Islamic Research Academy of Al-Azhar University told Asharq Al-Awsat that “this fatwa is completely wrong, and fatwas that call for death should not be issued freely as this leads to killings.” Dr. Bayoumi, who is also the former Dean of the Faculty of Theology at Al-Azhar University added that “it is not usual for the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya to issue fatwas, so what has happened to make them change their position? Is it logical that when they do start issuing fatwas, this should be a fatwa calling for killing?

Dr. Bayoumi said that provoking the murder of Dr. ElBaredei would incite violence in Egyptian society, which is something that contradicts the teachings of Prophet Muhammad, something that the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya claim to be upholding. Dr. Bayoumi added that the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya fatwa is based upon a misunderstanding of Prophet Muhammad’s teachings.

Whilst Dr. Mohamed Rafat Othman, Professor of Comparative Jurisprudence at Al Azhar University, said that “this fatwa is reckless and not supported by any evidence as ElBaradei has not called on the Egyptian people to revolt against the ruling regime, but rather has called for a change in Egypt’s policies.”

Othman said that “[calling for] the shedding of blood is not so easy in Islam, anything that a man does in life is permissible unless expressly forbidden by Islamic Shariaa law.” He also said that most Muslim scholars agree that [calling for] bloodshed is forbidden in Islam.

He added “for people to ambush somebody and kill them is a terrible sin…differences in opinion should be settled by means of dialogue and fair-speaking, for as God Almighty said [in the Quran] “speak fair to the people” [Surat al-Baqara; Verse 83].

As for the political controversy stirred by this fatwa, ElBaradei’s National Coalition for Change said that it considered this fatwa to be extremely dangerous. A leading member of this organization, Ahmed Bahaa Shaaban, told Asharq Al-Awsat that “this fatwa is an indication that Egyptian, Arab, and Islamic society is on the verge of further deterioration, with the tolerant religion of Islam being used to intimidate figures and threaten their lives, rather than providing security, stability, and respect.”

Shaaban added that “this fatwa only serves the forces of corruption in Egypt, and intimidates any citizen who is calling for change.” Shaaban added that even during the era when governing regime’s clerics would issue fatwas in the interests of the government, such fatwas never went so far as to call for the death of the government’s political opponents.

Shaaban told Asharq Al-Awsat that “it is our duty now to take a strong stance to confront this new trend of darkness which backs the regime of corruption and uses religion to achieve worldly objectives.” He also warned Egyptian citizens of adhering to this fatwa and making an attempt on the life of Dr. ElBaradei, as this is something that happened previously when Egyptian writer and Nobel Laureate Naguib Mahfouz was attacked after a fatwa was issued against one of his novels.

The Egyptian Organization for Human Rights [EOHR] has called on Egypt’s general prosecutor to investigate the fatwa that justifies the killing of Dr. ElBaradei issued by the Ansar al-Sunnah al-Muhamadiya association.

The EOHR also called on Egypt’s general prosecutor to “strictly apply the law to those who issue religious edicts permitting the killing of people, which spreads fear among the citizens.” Whilst the head of EOHR described this fatwa as being “harmful to Islam.”

Make the 24th November DAY X for the Coalition

jj November 16th, 2010

Student activists have called for further mass civil disobedience targeting the coalition Government, following last week’s occupation of the Conservative headquarters.

More than 50 arrests have been made since the recent violence

More than 50 arrests have been made since the recent violence

This statement was passed by the 400-strong “Take Back Education” teach-in at King’s College London on the 27th February 2010:

Education is under attack. Up to a third of university funding – £2.5bn – is to be cut, 30 universities could shut down and over 14,000 lecturers may lose their jobs. Big businesses exert more and more control over the university system. Cuts in student places and higher fees could exclude many people from higher education altogether.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Education workers are winning through strike action. Student protests are taking off across Europe, with universities occupied to stop neoliberal reforms – and to take control of campus for another kind of education. From this conference we resolve build on this resistance, and:

1. To support, build and encourage action against education cuts through demonstrations, student occupations and industrial action. To build solidarity with these struggles through inviting strikers, occupiers and others to speak at our college/union/campaign meetings; organising petitions, collections, and solidarity demonstrations and occupations.
2. To organise regional teach-ins on the Take Back Education model. To launch regional education action networks from these that can help develop local networks of resistance and spread the kind of action that can win.
3. To organise a national coordination from here to help coordinate and spread our resistance nationally. This coordination should produce and distribute without delay a national bulletin carrying reports and announcements from this teach-in and the developing local struggles. It will help to spread the resistance when people move into action.
4. To mobilise for and support the London wide demonstration called by London region UCU to defend education on March 20th and other initiatives such as the no cuts at Westminster demonstration on Monday 1st, the Leeds UCU demo Thursday 4th march, and No Cuts @ Kings protest on Sat 13th March.
5. To recognise the cuts in education as part of a broader attack on the public sector, and the need for solidarity across the sector. To support and mobilise for the national demonstration against public sector cuts on the 10th April.
6. To organise through our respective trade unions, students unions, local anti-cuts groups, campaigns and organisations support for a national demonstration to defend education in the autumn.

November 14, 2010
by educationactivistnetwork

The 10th November protest at Millbank has drawn comparisons with the poll tax riot of 31st March 1990. This was followed by a wave of demonstrations at town halls and councils and a civil disobedience campaign of non-payment. By November 1990 the tax had been abolished and Margaret Thatcher had resigned.

We need to ramp up action against the Con-Dem Coalition in the same way now. Let’s turn Wednesday 24th November into DAY X for the Coaliton!

TARGET LIB DEMS AFTER NEW BETRAYAL

After revelations in the Guardian newspaper showing that the Liberal Democrats planned all along to renege on their promises about tuition fees, we want a day of mass walkouts to converge on a demonstration outside the Lib Dem HQ at 2pm.

STUDENTS AND WORKERS UNITE

This will be followed by an early evening demonstration on Downing Street bringing together students with trade unionists, the unemployed and everyone under attack by the Con-Dems.

That’s What She Said: Masochistically Pacifist

jj November 4th, 2010

From Valley Star

Civil disobedience. The active, professed refusal to obey certain laws, or demands of a government, has played a vital role in all movements for justice, usually taking the form of nonviolent resistance.

The Valley Star has been following the disciplinary action of Valley College student Samuel Lara since last May when he was removed from an ASU meeting after his refusal to move from behind the ASU president and cease his peaceful protest against Arizona’s controversial SB1070 on immigration.

Lara and the cause he supports, Alto Arizona, are exactly the type of nonviolent resistance that historically have succeeded in encouraging change on a monumental level.

Last week, Lara’s displays of civil disobedience again made front-page news. This time, he was met with violence. Student witnesses remarked that Lara was slammed against the hood of a police car and that his arm was twisted almost to the point of breaking.

In response to the incident Deputy Ricky Baker said that Lara, “addressed them with racial slurs” and failed “to comply with the officers questions.”

Henry David Thoreau said, “[i]t is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right.”

In 1849, Thoreau’s essay on civil disobedience argued that people should not permit governments to overrule or weaken their consciences and that we have a duty to avoid allowing the government to make us agents of injustice.

Perhaps Lara was disrespectful to campus police, but they had absolutely no reason to inflict violence on a non-violent individual.

Dating back to 1819, in his poem, “The Masque of Anarchy,” Percy Shelley commented on the psychological consequences of violence met with pacifism. Shelley said the guilty will return shamefully to society.

Deputy Baker also suggested that, “Mr. Lara’s intent here was to bait both the Valley Star staff and the security staff into a public display, which he may gain empowerment and recognition for.”

Deputy Baker, I wholeheartedly agree with you there. The difference between us is that you seem hell-bent on silencing and punishing Mr. Lara for standing up and making himself heard on an issue he believes in, and I fully support Lara and his right to demonstrate nonviolent civil disobedience.

Perhaps you should be more supportive, Deputy Baker. If it weren’t for Rosa Parks and her displays of civil disobedience, you might be still be segregated to patrolling the colored section of campus, if at all.

The student body should be thanking Lara for reminding us that the only way to incite change is to stand up for what we believe in. As Edmund Burke said, “all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

Mr. Lara, there is an old biblical verse that says, “whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might.”

Turkey: Is a Kurdish School Boycott a Sign of the Future?

jj September 29th, 2010

From EurasiaNet.org
September 24, 2010 – 2:07pm, by Nicholas Birch

Have Turkey’s Kurds discovered the power of Gandhi and Rosa Parks?

It certainly looked that way in mid-September as thousands of school children across Turkey’s mainly Kurdish southeast stayed away from school to protest the lack of Kurdish-language education in Turkish state schools.

Acts of mass civil disobedience have been largely absent from the 26-year war that the Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, has waged against the Turkish state.

Today, observers believe it could become a key Kurdish nationalist tactic, as the PKK faces off against a Turkish government trying to revive efforts to end the war, and struggles to retain the support of its Kurdish support base whose loyalty risks being worn away by a growing economic prosperity and steady, if slow-paced improvements in civil liberties.

Timed to coincide with the start of the new school year, the five-day long boycott was called by a Kurdish NGO that has no known links to the PKK. But it was the backing of the Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) — a Kurdish party that shares the PKK’s support base — that ensured that thousands of children stayed away.

The BDP has developed quite a taste for boycotts recently. On September 12, in a face-off against the government, it called on Kurds to boycott a constitutional referendum, and got what it wanted: roughly half of voters in the southeast stayed at home, with absenteeism in some areas higher than 90 percent. [For background see EurasiaNet’s archive].

Analysts said the referendum results, which provided fresh proof of the BDP’s regional clout, acted as a catalyst for fresh talks between the government and the BDP. The renewed dialogue began September 23 after a long break. During the meeting, BDP representatives called for an end of military operations in Kurdish areas. Turkish leaders, meanwhile, reiterated their opposition to Kurdish-language education. A second meeting could take place before the end of September.

The idea of using civil disobedience as a tactic appears to have crystallized at a Kurdish nationalist congress held last June.

Working under banners proclaiming “autonomy for Kurdistan, democracy for Turkey,” a slogan borrowed from the PKK’s imprisoned leader, Abdullah Ocalan, delegates agreed that calling on the Turkish government to improve Kurdish rights was not enough: “We also [need to] take de facto steps to govern ourselves”, a communiqué read.

If pro-PKK Kurds had not had satellite television channels running out of Europe since the mid-1990s, Turkey would never have opened its state-run Kurdish channel in 2009, argued Mahmut Alinak, a prominent Kurdish politician who is a long-time supporter of civil disobedience. “You need to oblige the state to make moves. If you don’t send children to school, then the school loses its value. You paralyze state institutions,” he said.

In some parts of southeastern Turkey, according to some analysts, that is exactly what is happening.

In Yuksekova, a nationalist stronghold, many locals say they turn to the PKK, not the police and courts, to solve problems. The state seems to have turned in on itself too: rather than stepping out onto the high street, local police now use a new supermarket opened inside headquarters. Pro-PKK graffiti covers the old army recruiting office, abandoned for new, safer premises out of town.

“The basic attitude is ‘you ignore us, we ignore you’”, said Hakan Tahmaz, an ethnic Turk who has written widely on the Kurdish issue. “Boycotts do not polarize the country in the same way as PKK attacks on Turkish soldiers do, but the philosophy behind them is in some ways more radical: creating de facto autonomy.”

The schools in Hakkari province, which includes Yuksekova, were almost completely empty this week, less than a fortnight after only 9 percent of locals voted in the constitutional referendum.

But some analysts contend that Hakkari, and the neighboring province of Sirnak, are exceptions rather than the rule. They also portray the boycott as a sign that the PKK’s power over its support base may be fading, rather than growing.

“Here in Diyarbakir, and the surrounding region, the [school] boycott had little effect”, said Serdar Yilmaz, head of an Islamist NGO in the southeast’s largest city. “The PKK is being pushed back into the mountain areas” next to Turkey’s border with Iraq.

For Yilmaz, the PKK’s implicit support for acts of civil disobedience, such as the boycott, are part of its efforts to adapt itself to changing conditions. “Everything points to the PKK, sooner or later, dropping its guns,” Yilmaz said. “America wants it to, Turkey’s neighbors want it to, Turkey – at last – is taking steps to persuade it to, it wants to itself. But disarming creates a dilemma. For years, guns and war, the struggle, martyrdom, have been the PKK’s means of mobilization. Now, if it is to stay alive, it needs to find more ‘civil’ ways of mobilizing support.”

The school boycott was the not the only example of civil disobedience in Kurdish areas this month. On September 21, 20 men charged with links to the PKK refused to speak Turkish in a Diyarbakir court. Pro-Kurdish news agencies, meanwhile, were reporting on plans to organize boycotts of military service, compulsory in Turkey for men over 18.

It is too early to say whether Kurdish nationalists’ new-found taste for civil disobedience will persuade the Turkish government to speed up snail-paced reforms. On 15 September, Education Minister Nimet Cubukcu described the mass truancy as a “misuse of parenting rights tantamount to exploitation” and threatened parents whose children didn’t turn up for school with prosecution.

As to whether boycotts and civil action can provide a foundation for a new, civilianized PKK, most analysts remain skeptical. They point to the growth of a new middle-class in cities like Diyarbakir opposed to the group. The PKK’s authoritarian-like mistrust of anything that smacks of independent thought, they add, makes it ill-adapted to civilian life.

Serdar Yilmaz warned against the assumption that a Kurdish nationalism stripped of its guns might be more amenable to deal-making. “Kurdish national feeling is profoundly anchored in the minds and hearts of people in this region,” he said. “If Ankara thinks that ending the war and a pushing through a couple more cosmetic reforms is going to be enough, it is in for a shock.”

Underground press in Burma challenges generals

jj September 15th, 2010

From The Australian
BURMA is a dangerous place for the media. Foreign journalists are routinely refused entry.

Local journalists are heavily censored, underground journalists are hunted down, arrested and jailed for years.

Paranoid and xenophobic, the ruling military junta is ever vigilant to quash criticism, especially now, with an election due.

An election set for November, the first in 20 years, has been widely derided as a farce and a military publicity exercise that will do little to change the nature of the repressive regime.

Nevertheless, optimists think the exercise might open a little space for incremental change.

So journalists, inside and outside the barricaded nation, have been monitoring developments with great interest.

As the Thailand bureau chief of the non-profit Democratic Voice of Burma news network, Toe Zaw Latt helps oversee 100 staff working illicitly in Burma, as well as more than 38 in Thailand.
An Australian citizen with a degree from Monash University, Toe Zaw Latt is sure the ruling State Peace and Development Council will try to further restrict news from Burma as the elections get nearer.

He is working on ways to foil the generals’ plans and get news out to the world. However rigged it is, the election might bring some surprises, and however they pan out, they are important news.

“Sure, it’s getting more dangerous,” he says, in the DVB headquarters in Thailand’s northern city of Chiang Mai.

“Everything is planned, everything is controlled. They will shut down the internet — they did it for the Saffron uprising (by the monks in 2007), the referendum, the visit of (UN Secretary-General) Ban Ki Moon.

“But we are already prepared for this. We have to use the latest technology, we have to open many ways to overcome this deadlock.”

The junta has established a Russian-trained police cyber-crime unit, he says, to track down undercover and citizen journalists trying to send information out of Burma via the internet.

Toe Zaw Latt is reluctant to spell out details of the various ways of getting round the expected clampdown, but it’s likely they include satellite phones, clandestine internet tricks, and straightforward smuggling of footage over the border to Thailand. DVB has stringers all over Burma, including conflict zones.

“If anything happens we know, we know,” he says.

The news network broadcasts television and radio into Burma in various languages, to an estimated audience of 10 million, and also runs a website (www.dvb.no).

Cut off from the world and real news by heavy restriction of the internet and rigorous censorship of newspapers, Burmese mostly rely on external broadcasts from DVB, the BBC World Service, VOA, and Radio Free Asia.

Toe Zaw Latt says the media in Burma are “largely ineffective”.

Weekly titles such as the Myanmar Times, owned by Australian Ross Dunkley, are heavily censored, he says, and they cannot be relied on.

“They repeat propaganda,” he says. “They have to, it’s compulsory.” So far, he says, the junta has not permitted publication of a privately owned daily newspaper.

DVB journalists are often leaked information by well-wishers from all strata of the junta.

“Not every soldier, not even all the high-ranking ones, is happy with what is going on,” he says.

“They are happy to leak information to us.”

He notes with some pride that DVB first aired the news that the junta wanted to develop nuclear weapons.

This stream of leaks may dry up as the election gets closer, and leaking becomes more dangerous. Still, the smiling bureau chief says, DVB will not miss anything.

Junta officers cannot be directly questioned, but DVB always gets its hands on information from tightly controlled press conferences.

This simmering military dissatisfaction, Toe Zaw Latt says, is the impetus behind the elections.

The ruling military junta, the State Peace and Development Council, has been impervious to Western sanctions and uninterested in Western criticism.

Civil protest, such as the Saffron uprising, left the generals unmoved. So why even bother to stage elections?

Toe Zaw Latt says that’s the million-dollar question, and it has a very local answer. Many in the military were becoming restless, and asking what had happened to the back-to-barracks plan, and the “roadmap to democracy” mooted years ago.

Toe Zaw Latt was exiled from Burma in 1988, when a popular uprising challenged the junta and thousands were killed.

He won’t say how many of the 100 Burmese working for DVB in Burma are journalists and how many are support staff, as he wants to keep the junta in the dark as much as possible.

Nor will he say how many DVB journalists have been jailed, but it’s at least six, including one young woman who was sentenced to 27 years earlier this year for interviewing monks.

DVB journalists almost never carry cameras openly, and hidden cameras are used.

Some of the tricks were seen on Burma VJ, a documentary about DVB journalists that was in the running for an Academy Award earlier this year.

Junta paranoia extends to anyone seen with a video camera.

Video repair shop staff avoid taking cameras anywhere, in case they are caught in a sweep.

Video cameras are generally owned only by the rich, so any subversive journalist caught with a camera is in deep trouble.

Regardless of international scepticism about the election, Toe Zaw Latt thinks that it could open some space for civilian discourse.

University of Gothenburg Resistance Seminars Fall Schedule 2010

Stellan Vinthagen September 5th, 2010

We invite you all to the new semester of Resistance Studies Seminars. For the seventh time we have a full and interesting number of seminars that explore critically the meaning of resistance and its various articulations. All seminars are this time on Swedish.
September 16 with Marcus Regnander and Mattias Ström, International Solidarity Movement – Researchers. Nonviolent Resistance and State Repression in Hebron. Seminar is in Swedish. September 16. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 419.

October 13 with Tiina Rosenberg, Professor of Gender Studies. Från protest till motstånd: Utgaångspunkt Ulrike Meinhofs text Vom Protest zum Widerstand. Seminar is in Swedish. October 13. Wednesday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 419.

October 28 with Salka Sanden, author. 1990-talet och den autonoma rörelsens framväxt i Sverige. Seminar is in Swedish. October 28. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 419.

November 11 with Daniel Hjalmarsson, Akademikerförbundet SSR. På jobbet är väl alla hetero…?: Öppenhet och stängda dörrar på sveriges arbetsplatser. Seminar is in Swedish. November 11. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 419.

November 25 with Mats Adolfsson, historian. Svenska uppror: bondeuppror och gatukravaller. Seminar is in Swedish. November 25. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 419.

December 9 with Mattias Gardell (or another member of) Ship To Gaza. Seminar is in Swedish. December 9. Thursday 15:15-17.00 at the Annedalseminariet at Room 419.

After the seminar there is a post-seminar gathering at restaurant Gyllene Prag (Sveag. 25) from 17:00 and onwards. We eat, drink and continue the discussions from the seminar in a more informal way. You are welcome to attend even if you was not at the seminar!
Annedalsseminariet, Seminariegatan 1A, close to Linneplatsen. see description how to find at: http://www.globalstudies.gu.se/kontakt
Welcome!

Call for proposals: The Underground Railroad Resistance Against Slavery

Stellan Vinthagen September 2nd, 2010

Abolishing Slavery in the Atlantic World: The ‘Underground Railroad’ in the Americas, Africa, and Europe

The Tenth Anniversary Underground Railroad Public History Conference
Sponsored by the Underground Railroad History Project of the Capital Region, Inc.

April 8 – 10, 2011 at Russell Sage College, Troy, New York

Where there was slavery, there was resistance, escape, and rebellion. The Transatlantic Slave Trade (1400s to 1800s) was a global enterprise that transformed the four continents bordering the Atlantic, and that engendered the formation of a multifaceted and international Underground Railroad resistance movement.

The broad geographic nature of this freedom struggle is the theme of the 2011 UGR Public History Conference. We invite proposals that address capture, enslavement, and resistance within and across borders in Africa, Europe, and the Americas, historically and contemporarily, as well as proposals that address the preservation of the voices of the past and their relationship with us today.

Possible questions to be considered:

  • What were the similarities and differences among the slave systems created by Europeans in the Americas?
  • How did the enslaved and their allies engage in resistance, rebellion and revolution in the four continents and the Atlantic Ocean?
  • What were the forms that global abolitionism took?
  • What roles were played by escaped slaves, inlcuding those who crossed national borders?
  • What is the range of experience captured by slave narratives and testimonies in various countries and on different continents?
  • How did Africans and people of African descent involve themselves with indigenous peoples in the countries and colonies of the Americas and the other continents?
  • What are contemporary manifestations of this international freedom struggle?
  • How can we preserve the voices of the past and relate them to us today?

Proposals on related questions, not directly on this theme, are also welcomed.

Proposals may be for a 60-minute panel session, workshop, cultural/artistic activity, media production, poster, or other exhibit that addresses these questions and this theme. When possible, activities should encourage audience interaction. Proposals should include: title, content description, type of presentation, names and contact information of presenters, target audience, and technology needs.

Proposals should be submitted by July 31, 2010 Via postal mail to:
URHPCR, PO Box 10851, Albany NY 12201 or via email to urhpcr2011@gmail.com

For more information, call 518-432-4432

“The gold standard of Underground Railroad conferences… bringing together an extraordinary spectrum of attendees, ranging from noted scholars and authors to large numbers of interested laymen, in spirited and informative workshops which both bring history alive and open new avenues of research.” — Fergus M. Bordewich, author, Bound for Canaan

Underground Railroad History Project of the Capital Region, Inc. researches, preserves, and retells New York’s regional history of the Underground Railroad, highlighting the role of African-American freedom seekers and local abolitionists

Avhandling om motstånd mot heteronormativ könsmakt

Stellan Vinthagen April 4th, 2010

Vi har glädjen att meddela att Cathrine Wasshede är nu klar med sin avhandling om motstånd mot heteronormativ könsmakt: Passionerad Politik (2010).

Avhandlingen presenteras och försvaras offentligt vid Göteborgs Universitet, Sociologiska institutionen, den 9 april, kl 13:15, hörsalen Sappören, Sprängkullsgatan 25, Göteborg.

Om du vill veta mer om boken eller beställa den så kolla in: www.bobbox.se

Preventing Nonviolent Political Revolutions

jj January 16th, 2010

In recent decades more unarmed than violent revolutions have succeeded in removing regimes in political revolutions. Some of these are well known and others very under-researched. Even more cases has not (yet?) been successful.

I’m for the moment collecting information for a report on what the authoritarian regimes are doing to prevent masses of unarmed protesters to successfully remove unpopular regimes.

As we have seen in Iran and many other places the old power-holders have closed down internet and mobile phone systems to prevent the opposition from communicating internally and inform the rest of the world on what is going on. In Burma they moved the capital to a remote place in the forest and closed the new city. This was obviously done to prevent demonstrations outside the legislative buildings. In China we have recently seen activists from the opposition disappearing. In Russia NGOs are not allowed to receive money from external donors. In Belarus it is more and more difficult to register NGOs. Curfews, brutal police violence, extensive surveillance,…. The list is very long on actions by governments to prevent the opposition from succeeding.

I’m trying to get an overview over what is done by governments and other power-holders to reduce the efficiency of oppositional movements. In this work I need help and are asking everyone to send me reliable cases, stories, and reports on these types of activities. Please provide me with sources when possible.

All info could be sent to johansen (dot) jorgen (at) gmail (dot) com

I promise to send each informant a copy of the report when it is done.

Recomended site on “iRevolution”

Stellan Vinthagen January 6th, 2010

A specialized site on “iRevolution” is something that might be of interest for resistance students. “An iRevolution is the individual’s revolution in self-sufficiency, self-determination and self-survival facilitated by information communication technology.” On the site you can find entries on a lot of things connected to this theme, as e.g. civil resistance, cyberactivism, SMS social revolutions, etc. The site is run by the PhD-candidate Patrick Meier and is part of his dissertation work on the concept. Check it out!

Link to the site: http://irevolution.wordpress.com/

Resistance at the Climate Summit in Copenhagen Dec 2010

Stellan Vinthagen December 11th, 2009

During the coming days, from Saturday until the end of next week, there will be several demonstrations, civil disobedience actions and other forms of resistance in Copenhagen at the COP-15 Climate Summit. Major demonstrations are expected, a blockade of the harbor of Copenhagen is happening on Sunday and is organized by Climate Justice Action. On Wednesday next week there will be thousands who will do civil disobedience and try to break into the summit of the politicians and create a “Peoples’ Summit”. And, like other such summit protests against G8 or WTO there will for sure be riots.

On Sunday there will also be a uniqe “Academic Conference Blockade”. An academic conference in which researchers, lectureres and other academics will present research papers on climate issues while simultanously doing civil disobedience and blockade in the harbor, stoping climate destructive activity and thus, taking their responsibility for their academic analysises of the need to act and stop climate change. It is theory and practice combined, a form of “engaged academia”. At this conference blockade I will present a paper with the title: “A Proposal of a ‘Panel on Climate Justice’: 7 theses and the ‘Pope Model’”

The police are mobilized from all over Denmark and new legal measures are used creating virtually a state of emergency in Copenhagen, as well as special jails for protesters in what is called a “Climate Guantanamo”.

Reports will be given here on the blog as soon as we have interesting materials to reveal about the ongoing mobilization of a new global movement: the Climate Justice Movement.

Call For Papers: Network Politics

Stellan Vinthagen November 16th, 2009

Thinking Network Politics: Methods, Epistemology, Process

We invite the submission of abstracts for the first event of the AHRC funded networking project ‘Exploring New Configurations of Network Politics’. The event will combine a series of position papers followed by round table discussions and interventions exploring the issues and challenges raised by those papers.

The attempt to grasp the depth and breadth of network politics demands novel and transdisciplinary approaches not always native to the humanities and social sciences, such as graph theory and the study of code as cultural practice. Thus there is a drive to explore the broad spectrum of practices and discourses to help rethink the articulations of politics in network culture. New modes of political activity that take advantage of new platforms from Twitter to Youtube necessitate new conceptual positions for network culture, counter-power and resistance. The papers should work towards adapting concepts such as, for example but by no means exclusively, the Multitude, free and immaterial labour, emergence, swarms and ’smart mobs’ and new forms of creation, activism and engagement in civil society. The aim is to rethink what we understand by politics. Further questions which need to be asked include: what kind of epistemologies do we need to incorporate into our analysis? How can we take into account the particularities of networks when approaching the elusive, ephemeral nature of politics of/in networks? These are just examples of the directions into which considerations of “network politics” might lead us. Because this is such a fast developing and challenging arena of research the event will aim to be open and fluid, encouraging engagement, conversation and innovation wherever possible, while focussing on this core problematic of the tools and processes for thinking network politics.

The papers for this event will thus ideally investigate the methods and innovative approaches to mapping and thinking such new network politics. The March event will thus aim elaborate on the nature of the network and forge new routes to thinking about the processual, dynamic nature of networks as well as the particular “objects” such approaches fabricate.

The papers should be in the format of short (max 10 minute) position papers on key concepts or keywords that lead into group work and discussions into the questions of network politics and methods and approaches for analysis. Instead of normal academic papers followed by a short Q&A, we would like the event to encourage collaboration, collective discussions and agenda setting.

The event takes place in Cambridge, UK, Anglia Ruskin University, on Thursday 25 and Friday 26 March 2010.

Please submit your abstracts and any suggestions (max 300 words) by January 8, 2010 to

(to avoid spam the emails are written with spaces, delete them when you send your email) joss.hands @ anglia.ac.uk and/or jussi.parikka @ anglia.ac.uk

The research project functions under the auspices of the Anglia Research Centre in Digital Culture (ArcDigital ) – http://www.anglia.ac.uk/arcdigital

Please forward any inquiries to either Dr Joss Hands or Dr Jussi Parikka.

Students occupy their universities in Europe

Stellan Vinthagen November 15th, 2009

There is an ongoing wave of student occupations and protest for a free and better university education, and against privatization policies at several European universities, mainly in Germany and Austria. (Not in France yet …).

The occupations started at Vienna University the 22 Oct, and has since then spread throughout Austria, and to other countries. See some reports at sites like these: site 1, site 2. It is interesting to note that the occupations are not mentioned as far as I can find in New York Times or BBC …

Last time we did see a wave of student occupations were in connection to the Gaza massacre in January, and then that happend mainly in the UK.

Historically radical student activism has played an important role in the creation of broader social movements, e.g. in the 1968 world rebellion.

There is a map of presently occupied universities, occupations that the police brooken up and other forms of protests by students. See here.

Nonviolent Livelihood Struggle and Global Militarism: Links & Strategies

jj October 26th, 2009

International Conference, Ahmedabad, India, 22 – 25 of January 2010
Symbol

There is an inescapable link between the globalisation-induced displacement, dis-employment and dispossession that are results of internal wars and ravage local, traditional and indigenous natural-resource based communities everywhere. There is a linkage between these and the monstrous international wars – whether they are fought in Afghanistan, Iraq, Congo or Somalia. The biggest challenge therefore is to build alliances that are local and global at the same time, and those that not only resist injustice but also present alternatives.

Medha Patkar

War Resisters’ International is cooperating with Indian partner organisations for an international conference investigating the links between local nonviolent livelihood struggles and global militarism, including war profiteering. This participatory conference will bring together campaigners from all over the world to analyse the role of states and multinational corporations in depriving local communities of their sources of livelihood, and learning from the experience of nonviolent resistance at various levels – from the community to the global – and at various phases, from preventing displacement to planning for return.

More info here.

Registration here.

Unique Interview with Prof Gene Sharp

Stellan Vinthagen March 4th, 2009

In Boston, just about a week ago, two members of the Resistance Studies Network, Jörgen Johansen and I, did an interview with the classic researcher on nonviolent resistance: Gene Sharp, in Boston, USA. The interview is taped by the film-maker Ninja Thyberg and will be made into a tutoring video later on.

Gene Sharp wrote the ground breaking book: The Politics of Nonviolent Action in 1973. It was the first real research in which the thinking and practice of Mohandas K. Gandhi became part of the political theory.

Sharp developed in his PhD a power theory of consent, claiming that the power of rulers depend on the consent of those ruled. If their consent was withdrawn – through strikes, non-cooperation, civil disobedience, etc. – then the rulers would not be able to rule anymore. From this basic point Sharp developed his detailed theory of nonviolent strategies and methodologies, documenting more than 198 methods already being used in the history in various contexts and in different periods of history.

Today, after numerous books and articles, Gene Sharp is the giant of nonviolent resistance research. His work has inspired several resistance movements in the world. For the most comprehensive collection of his work, see the Albert Einstein Institution.

The unique interview is important since it is done by two researchers on nonviolent resistance, and focus on the problems and criticism of that exists. Thus, it is a video that will display a critical discussion on the potential of nonviolent resistance.

We are happy to announce; The 4th Semester of Gothenburg Resistance Seminar

Stellan Vinthagen January 15th, 2009

Resistance Studies Seminar, Gothenburg University
Jan-June 2009
4th Semester of RSN Seminar, www.resistancestudies.org
Seminar organizer: Stellan Vinthagen

The Seminar is the main meeting point for researchers, students and activists interested in critical resistance studies. All seminars are open for interested participants. All are also welcome to the lectures of the undergraduate course in resistance which sometimes are before the seminar (at 13-15) although some of them are in Swedish, see the language of the title for each occasion.

If you are interested to present during the next session (the 5 semester) in Sept-Dec 2009, or if you know persons that should be invited to present, or if you have interesting articles/texts that could form a base for a seminar; feel welcome to take contact with the seminar organizer; Stellan Vinthagen; stellan.vinthagen @ resistancestudies.org (type email without spaces).

Every second Thursday at 15.15-17.00 (at odd weeks) at the Annedalsseminariet, room 403, Konstepidemins väg 2, close to Linnéplatsen (see description how to find at www.globalstudies.gu.se)

Seminar program:

29 Jan Camilla Orjuela , PhD and Researcher in Peace and Development research, School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University. On Identities of resistance: A note about street gangs, globalised violent conflict and Sri Lanka’s war zones in London and Toronto (Mail to Camilla for paper: camilla. orjuela @ globalstudies. gu. se Type email without space) (In English) Room 403.

12 Feb Balder Lingegård and Rikard Fröberg from the Pirate Party. On file-sharing, copyright and resistance. (In English) Room 403.

26 Feb Anton Törnberg och Patrik Palm, om motstånd och rörelser i Latinamerika (OBS: 13-15 föreläsning, 15-17 seminarium) (In Swedish) Rum 403.

12 March Niklas Hansson, PhD. “Network Politics and the Gothenburg Social Forum-process“. A seminar about local social forum-organization within the World Social Forum-process. The session will take as its starting point an ethnological study [Ph.D dissertation] based on fieldwork in Gothenburg, Sweden, between 2003 and 2005. The study’s main theoretical influence is Manuel DeLanda’s neo-materialist Assemblage Theory, but draws from a range of theoretical sources (social movement theory, actor network theory, information theory, systems theory, globalization theory). (In English) Note: Room 303.

26 March Linnea Svensk baserat på sitt examensarbete i psykologi; Om Freud och motstånd i behandlingssituationer av patienter (OBS: 13-15 föreläsning, 15-17 seminarium) (In Swedish) Rum 403.

9 April Leif Eriksson, Senior Lecturer in Peace and Development research, School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University. Reflections on economy, everyday, norms and resistance. (In English) Room 403.

23 April Katrin Uba, Anti-privatisation struggles in India (13-15 motståndskursen, 15-17 motståndsseminariet). (In English) Room 403.

7 May Suzanne Hammad, PhD Candidate, School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queens University- Belfast, Northern Ireland. On Palestinian ”emplaced” resistance in the village Bilin, West Bank. (In English) Room 403.

28 May Erik Andersson, Senior Lecturer in Peace and Development research, School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University. On Economy and resistance (discoursive strategies against neoliberal hegemony). (In English) Room 403. (Note that the date is not the normal one, due to holidays).

4 June Vera Häggblom, former student School of Global Studies. On ETA and the Basque Resistance. (In English) Room 403.

International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest, 1500 to the Present

jj December 9th, 2008

A new impressive Encyclopedia is soon out. In eight volumes the editor Immanuel Ness has collected articles on Revolutions and Protests the last 500 years. This work is a must for all institutions and researchers with focus on resistance, history, social movements, and/or democracy. The books will be presented and discussed at one of the Resistance Studies Seminars in 2009.

If you want to check it out take a look here: http://www.revolutionprotestencyclopedia.com/

Gothenburg Seminar: Scientific discourse and Resistance

Stellan Vinthagen November 30th, 2008

At next Gothenburg Resistance Studies Seminar, the 4 Dec, PhD-student Gunilla Priebe will discuss scientific discourse and resistance, building on her coming dissertation. (For practical information on times and place, see above on “Seminars”).

Here is her presentation of the seminar:

The title of the seminar is “Who is the expert? Re-defining scientific quality standards as a source of resistance towards colonially ascribed identities”, and it draws on the last chapters of my forthcoming (Dec. -09) dissertation in Theory of Science, Gothenburg University, Sweden.

My dissertation has so far not explicitly dealt with issues of resistance or used theories explicitly discussing resistance, and it is therefore my hope that the seminar is going to give useful comments on this theme as I can see its presence in every “corner” of my material, and this paper is therefore an introduction to my dissertation rather than a set presentation of resistance strategies, theories etc.

The empirical case in focus of my dissertation is the international research alliance The Multilateral Initiative on Malaria (se below), but the aim has not been to evaluate the MIM, but instead to analyse it and present a background for why certain actors felt this kind of initiative was needed. The dissertation therefore studies activities carried out within the alliance and ideas expressed by researchers linked to this alliance in order to show in what ways micro-scientific events (fact making activities) are related to macro-phenomena such as historical and global discourses.

Also, I have struggled with questions regarding the gap between research and their sites of implementation (in this case: whether a philosophical and sociological analysis of malaria research can be of relevance to science policy entities, people working within organisations like the MIM, etc.), i.e. on a personal level the aim of this work has also been to investigate whether the “ivory tower syndrome” of such an abstract and theoretical discipline like Theory of Science is inescapable or not, and the seminar is therefore invited to comment also on this theme.
When reading the following text I ask you to kindly bear in mind that this is “work in progress”, that the text is meant to serve as a background for the seminar and that it therefore only very briefly presents a few aspects of an immensely complex topic. The text is thus a point of departure for a discussion and I welcome your input and critique, but disapprove of anybody quoting these embryonic thoughts of mine.

Kind regards, Gunilla Priebe

The ‘War on Terror’ Perspectives from the Global South

Stellan Vinthagen November 26th, 2008

[Please forward to all who may be interested]

On 11-12 December 2008, the Centre for the Study of ‘Radicalisation’ and Contemporary Political Violence (CSRV), based in the Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, will host a conference exploring perspectives on the ‘War on Terror’ as it is seen and experienced in the Global South.. The conference is part of a series of seminars, funded by the ESRC with additional financial support from BISA, on under-studied aspects of what is variably called ‘terrorism’, ‘political violence’ or ‘radicalisation’, but which for reasons of inclusivity we refer to as ‘political violence’. The aim of this conference is to provide a forum for scholars engaged in considering the ‘War on Terror’ from a Southern perspective, and to encourage scholars with knowledge in this field to focus on this rather neglected topic. Research focusing on this topic is rather thin on the ground, and we hope that this conference will go some way towards addressing this deficit.

Drawing both on regional studies and thematic analysis, the conference is organised in three panels: The ‘War on Terror’: Regional Implications; The Effect and Effectiveness of Counter Terror Policies in the ‘War on Terror’; and Human Rights and the ‘War on Terror’. The conference will finish with a plenary session, drawing together themes and issues from these discussions. Speakers will engage with the experience of the ‘War on Terror’ in a wide range of regions and countries: Latin America; Africa in general; Uganda and Tanzania; Morocco; Turkey; Pakistan; India; the Phillipines; and Sri Lanka. Issues considered include the securitisation and the politicization of aid; militarization; impacts on peace processes and domestic politics; repression; counter-insurgency policy; Islamism; and anti-terror legislation.

A sponsorship has allowed low fees, just £50 for staff, and £35 for students.

For more details, and a booking form, please visit: http://www.aber.ac.uk/interpol/en/research/conferences.htm
Or alternatively, email the conference administrator, Charlie Thame at

cet06 @ aber . ac. uk (type the address without spaces when you email)

Resistance Studies Panel Video out now!

Christopher Kullenberg November 5th, 2008

At the conference Cognitive Capital and Spaces of Mobility, the Resistance Studies Network arranged a panel. The video capture can be watched here (or download it here). Participants include José Manuel Viegas Neve, Marco Schirone and Stellan Vinthagen. It is almost two hours long, but if you couldn’t make it to the conference or have a general interest in resistance research, this video is for you!

Third semester of Resistance Seminars at Gothenburg University

Stellan Vinthagen August 12th, 2008

Dear friends at the Resistance Studies Network. The third semester of Resistance Studies Seminars are now ready! You can find the schedule below and updated information at the site above (See “Seminars”). The seminars – every second Thursday at 15-17 – are organised at the School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University and are regularly held in English (sometimes in Swedish). One week before the seminars (at least) a paper or background text is available at the site. The seminars are following a short network business-meeting (between 14-15 in the same room) in which we discuss the development and projects of our network. After the seminars we gather at restaurant Gyllene Prag across the street (from 17 and onwards…), where we drink and eat food, as well as discuss the seminar and resistance (or the latest movies, parties or relationship-gossips…).

You are welcome! Please feel free to forward the information to others!

Stellan Vinthagen, Seminar organiser RSN.

  1. Sep 11 2008 Peace Researcher Jörgen Johansen; Seminar on 9-11 and terrorism. “Osama Bin Laden should be thanked for the awakening!” The resistance is growing globally as a result of 9-11 and the ”War on Terror”. Which possible roads are probable, likely, wise and/or catastrophic? (see http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/tff/people/j_johansen.html)
  2. Sep 25 Visual Artist and former prof of Fine Arts Cecilia Parsberg; Seminar on Art, Culture and Resistance. About how art or our aesthetic expressions can be used as resistance, with examples from Sweden, Palestine and other places in the world. Film: “A Heart from Jenin”. Before the seminar, please read the paper (downloadable above at “Seminars”) and see previous projects at http://this.is/parsberg/)
  3. Oct 9 Seminar with Movies on Resistance (Stellan Vinthagen). One or several shorter movies on resistance relevant themes will be shown and discussed. If you have suggestions, contact Stellan; stellan. vinthagen @ resistancestudies. org (type without spaces in the address)
  4. Oct 23 Riff-Raff Co-Editor Per Ström; Seminarium om klasskamp och det “ansiktslösa motståndet” (Seminar is in Swedish, and about hidden work-place resistance). Per inleder diskussionen utifrån sin specialskrivna artikel för seminariet; ”Den politiska ekonomins väktare och desertörer: kapital, vänstern och det ansiktslösa motståndet.” Statistiken visar att fackligt motstånd och arbetarplatskamp minskat på senare decennier men stämmer det med verkligheten? Kan det vara så att kampen ändrat form under kapitalismens förändring och nya villkor? (Per is part of the editing team of http://www.riff-raff.se/)
  5. Nov 6 Dr Karl Palmås and Resistance Magazine Editor Christopher Kullenberg; Seminar on Surveillance, Power and Resistance. In late-modern societies in the West, as well as dictatorships, like Burma or China, surveillance is increasing and is developed into new forms. That changes the power structure, but also the articulation and expressions of resistance. Palmås and Kullenberg talks from their ongoing “Panspec-project”. (See http://rsmag.org/ and http://www.isk-gbg.org/99our68/)
  6. Nov 20 Assistant Prof. Bengt Brülde; Seminar on the Ethical Obligation to Resist. In some situations resistance is arguably an ethical obligation. (See http://maya.phil.gu.se/bengt/)
  7. Dec 4 PhD-Student Gunilla Priebe; Seminar on Resistance within the Science Discourse. Priebe talks about “Who is the expert? Re-defining scientific quality standards as a source of resistance towards colonially ascribed identities”. The theme is drawn from ongoing research (PhD project, dissertation June 2009). (See http://hum.gu.se/institutioner/idehistoria-och-vetenskapsteori/vetenskapsteori/utbildning/forskarutbildning/doktorander/gunilla/view?searchterm=approach)
  8. Dec 18 Post-Doc Fellow Patricia Lorenzoni; Seminar on Quilombo – stories about resistance and the right to land in Brazil. The seminar discusses histories of resistance and the right to land from the Case of Maroon descendants in Brazil. Quilombos were settlements of runaway slaves (Maroon) and other marginalised people in colonial Brazil that started in the 16th century. Although many quilombos were violently crushed, other survived at the margins of colonial society and are now negotiating their right to land. Lorenzoni’s dissertation dealt with violence, civilisation processes and anthropological understanding of the “savage”. (See http://hum.gu.se/institutioner/idehistoria-och-vetenskapsteori/personal/andra/patricia)

RSMag 2008#3 out now!

Christopher Kullenberg August 8th, 2008

[this message may be re-published anywhere]   - The third issue of the Resistance Studies Magazine is out now. You may read it immediately following this link. It has been a great pleasure to edit the five articles, and they are really worth reading. Here is a short summary of the articles from the editorial column: 

  • Drawing on a theoretical combination of James Scott’s conception of everyday resistance and Erwin Goffman’s symbolic interactionism, Carol Jo Evans develops an interesting case study of resistance within a North American Appalachian community.
  • Shane Gunderson discusses how resistance movements may gain momentum, as “popular intellectuals” facilitate and combine ideological work with political initiative. Gunderson shows, through a case-study, that structuring resistance in a more strategic fashion, through sequential actions, will increase the possibility of social change. 
  • Femke Kaulingfreks writes about the May 2008 riots in Copenhagen, and how such events, when taken seriously, seem to grow politics from the middle, thus shaping grounds for important political agency. What falls outside of normalisation, is not necessary disruptive in a counter-productive way, but may reveal inequalities and open up debates.
  • Thomas Riegler analyses the film The Battle of Algiers and how it has been caught up in debates on whether it has influenced resistance like an instruction manual in asymmetric warfare and guerrilla tactics, or not.
  • Finally, Adrian Bua deals with the problems of pluralism and democracy, and proposes how class analysis can contribute to a more sustainable alternative called pluralist socialism. 

Please download and read the articles, and watch out for a CFP for the 2008#4 Special Issue. 

Politics in everyday life

Safaa July 18th, 2008

I am now writing on a thesis about everyday politics and would like to continue on a thread written by Stellan Vinthagen in this blog the 5th of June.

The aim of the thesis is to outline different forms of everyday political acts. In studying organisations that deal with politics in everyday life I will try to see what, how and when individualised politics occur in Sweden. I can already now see that some organisations are dealing with hidden resistance, as the one Stellan wrote about, and others with more open acts that not necessarily could be called resistance.

In order to continue the categorisation I need to define what resistance is and what is not when comparing stealing from workplace, or foot-dragging, with buying fair trade or organic products. There are differences between the acts that need to be taken into consideration. They are close to categorisations such as “closer within system” or “more outside the system” (or the fields “encouraging” or “delaying” the system) or “within” or “outside norm”.

I agree with Stellan that it is highly interesting whether these informal, individual acts could be the start for uprisings. However, I was initially interested in this subject when thinking whether these individual acts could in themselves form a collective act, or even mobilisation. Though they seem to occur separately and unorganised I think that they could be collective as well. If anything, the individual acts are, according to me, organised within a discourse, especially the one of sustainable development. It dictates the time and place, and how to act.

And the question of mobilisation; could it be, that through politicising the everyday life, there is a stronger probability that people mobilise easily? If organisations give the space and forum for it, could they create another form of mobilisation of an “underground” or “quiet” uprising performed by individuals separately and anonymously? Examples of organisations are Planka.nu that encourages people to fair-dodge on public transport in protest of the capitalisation of public transport and Maska.nu that encourages, for example, foot-dragging to slow down production. They seem to organise and mobilise people, even though it is anonymously.

Also, what role could political acts performed in the everyday mean for the bigger picture? Even though the quantity of consumers boycott may not be enough to, for example, change a multi-national corporation like McDonalds, I believe that politicising food consumption at least gives a preparation for the time when the company simply can no longer continue as it does today (as the question is not if we have to change our consumption and production, rather when and how). So for example, if there is a common agreement, or discourse, that the meat industry is lethal for our planet and survival, then it could be easier to put governmental restrictions on that industry, as people will be prepared to live (nearly) without it, even though they used to consume from it. Vegetarians and vegans could be examples of individuals that are prepared for a food culture that probably most people have to live in, in the near future.

Next »