The Neolithic Age, Era, or Period, or New Stone Age, was a period in the development of human technology, beginning about 9500 BC in the Middle East that is traditionally considered the last part of the Stone Age. The Neolithic followed the terminal Holocene ''Epipalaeolithic'' period, beginning with the rise of farming, which produced the "Neolithic Revolution" and ending when metal tools became widespread in the Copper Age (chalcolithic) or Bronze Age or developing directly into the Iron Age, depending on the geographical region. The Neolithic is a measured progression of behavioral and cultural characteristics and changes, including the use of wild and domestic crops and the use of domesticated animals.

New findings put the beginning of the Neolithic culture back to around 10,700 to 9400 BC in Tell Qaramel in northern Syria, 25 km north of Aleppo. Until those findings are adopted within the archaeological community, the beginning of the Neolithic culture is considered to be in the Levant (Jericho, modern-day West Bank) about 9500 BC. It developed directly from the Epipaleolithic Natufian culture in the region, whose people pioneered the use of wild cereals, which then evolved into true farming. The Natufians can thus be called "proto-Neolithic" (12,500–9500 BC or 12,000–9500 BC). As the Natufians had become dependent on wild cereals in their diet, and a sedentary way of life had begun among them, the climatic changes associated with the Younger Dryas are thought to have forced people to develop farming. By 9500–9000 BC, farming communities arose in the Levant and spread to Asia Minor, North Africa and North Mesopotamia. Early Neolithic farming was limited to a narrow range of plants, both wild and domesticated, which included einkorn wheat, millet and spelt, and the keeping of dogs, sheep and goats. By about 8000 BC, it included domesticated cattle and pigs, the establishment of permanently or seasonally inhabited settlements, and the use of pottery.

Not all of these cultural elements characteristic of the Neolithic appeared everywhere in the same order: the earliest farming societies in the Near East did not use pottery, and, in Britain, it remains unclear to what extent plants were domesticated in the earliest Neolithic, or even whether permanently settled communities existed. In other parts of the world, such as Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia, independent domestication events led to their own regionally-distinctive Neolithic cultures that arose completely independent of those in Europe and Southwest Asia. Early Japanese societies used pottery ''before'' developing agriculture.

Unlike the Paleolithic, where more than one human species existed, only one human species (''Homo sapiens'') reached the Neolithic. Homo floresiensis may have survived right up to the very dawn of the Neolithic, about 12,000 years ago.

The term ''Neolithic'' derives from the Greek ''νεολιθικός'', ''neolithikos'', from ''νέος'' ''neos'', "new" + ''λίθος'' ''lithos'', "stone", literally meaning "New Stone Age." The term was invented by Sir John Lubbock in 1865 as a refinement of the three-age system.

Periods by pottery phase

In the Middle East, cultures identified as Neolithic began appearing in the 10th millennium BC. Early development occurred in the Levant (e.g., Pre-Pottery Neolithic A and Pre-Pottery Neolithic B) and from there spread eastwards and westwards. Neolithic cultures are also attested in southeastern Anatolia and northern Mesopotamia by c. 8000 BC.

The prehistoric Beifudi site near Yixian in Hebei Province, China, contains relics of a culture contemporaneous with the Cishan and Xinglongwa cultures of about 5000–6000 BC, neolithic cultures east of the Taihang Mountains, filling in an archaeological gap between the two Northern Chinese cultures. The total excavated area is more than 1,200 square meters and the collection of neolithic findings at the site consists of two phases.

Neolithic 1 – Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA)

Recent findings made by a Syrian-Polish joint excavation team run by Prof. R.F. Mazurowski, in Tell Qaramel, 25 km to the north of Aleppo put the beginning of the Neolithic 1 (PPNA) around 10,700 to 9400 BC. Previous excavations at that site brought the discovery of four circular towers dating back to between the eleventh millennium and about 9,650 BC . The dates of Tell Qaramel have been brought into question for appearing systematically old and for not correlating with the stratigraphic sequence.

Until the findings in Tell Qaramel are adopted within the archaeological community, sites in the Levant (Jericho, Palestine & Jbeil (Byblos), Lebanon) that go back to around 9500 to 9000 BC. are still considered the beginning of the Neolithic 1 (PPNA). The actual date is not established with certainty due to different results in carbon dating by scientists in the British Museum and Philadelphia laboratories.

An early temple area in southeastern Turkey at Göbekli Tepe dated to 10,000 BC may be regarded as the beginning of the Neolithic 1. This site was developed by nomadic hunter-gatherer tribes, evidenced by the lack of permanent housing in the vicinity. This temple site may be the oldest known man-made place of worship. At least seven stone circles, covering , contain limestone pillars carved with animals, insects and birds. Stone tools were used by perhaps as many as hundreds of people to create the pillars, which may have supported roofs.

The major advance of Neolithic 1 was true farming. In the proto-Neolithic Natufian cultures, wild cereals were harvested, and perhaps early seed selection and re-seeding occurred. The grain was ground into flour. Emmer wheat was domesticated, and animals were herded and domesticated (animal husbandry and selective breeding).

In the 21st century, remains of figs were discovered in a house in Jericho dated to 9400 BC. The figs are of a mutant variety that cannot be pollinated by insects, and therefore the trees can only reproduce from cuttings. This evidence suggests that figs were the first cultivated crop and mark the invention of the technology of farming. This occurred centuries before the first cultivation of grains.

Settlements became more permanent with circular houses, much like those of the Natufians, with single rooms. However, these houses were for the first time made of mudbrick. The settlement had a surrounding stone wall and perhaps a stone tower (as in Jericho). The wall served as protection from nearby groups, as protection from floods, or to keep animals penned. There are also some enclosures that suggest grain and meat storage.

Neolithic 2 – Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB)

The Neolithic 2 (PPNB) began around 8500 BC in the Levant (Jericho, Palestine). As with the PPNA dates there are two versions from the same laboratories noted above. But this terminological structure is not convenient for southeast Anatolia and settlements of the middle Anatolia basin. This era was before the Mesolithic era.

Settlements have rectangular mudbrick houses where the family lived together in single or multiple rooms. Burial findings suggest an ancestor cult where people preserved skulls of the dead, which were plastered with mud to make facial features. The rest of the corpse may have been left outside the settlement to decay until only the bones were left, then the bones were buried inside the settlement underneath the floor or between houses.

Neolithic 3 – Pottery Neolithic (PN)

The Neolithic 3 (PN) began around 6500 BC in the Fertile Crescent. By then distinctive cultures emerged, with pottery like the Halafian (Turkey, Syria, Northern Mesopotamia) and Ubaid (Southern Mesopotamia).

The Chalcolithic period began about 4500 BC, then the Bronze Age began about 3500 BC, replacing the Neolithic cultures.

Periods by region

Fertile Crescent

Around 9500 BC, the first fully developed Neolithic cultures belonging to the phase Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) appeared in the fertile crescent. Around 10,700 to 9400 BC, a settlement was established in Tell Qaramel, 25 kilometers north of Aleppo. The settlement included 2 temples dating back to 9650. Around 9000 BC during the PPNA, the world's first town, Jericho, appeared in the Levant. It was surrounded by a stone and marble wall and contained a population of 2000–3000 people and a massive stone tower. Around 6000 BC the Halaf culture appeared in Lebanon, Israel and Palestine, Syria, Anatolia, and Northern Mesopotamia and subsisted on dryland agriculture.

In 1981 a team of researchers from the Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée, including Jacques Cauvin and Oliver Aurenche divided Near East neolithic chronology into ten periods (0 to 9) based on social, economic and cultural characteristics. In 2002 Danielle Stordeur and Frédéric Abbès advanced this system with a division into five periods. Natufian (1) between 12000 and 10000 BCE, Khiamian (2a) between 10000 and 9500 BCE, PPNA: Sultanian (Jericho), Mureybetian (2b) between 9500 and 8700 BCE, early PPNB (''PPNB ancien'') (3a) between 8700 and 8200 BCE, middle PPNB (''PPNB moyen'') (3b) between 8200 and 7500 BCE, late PPNB (''PPNB récent'') (4) between 7500 and 7000 BCE and a PPNB (sometimes called PPNC) transitional stage (''PPNB final'') (5) where Halaf and dark faced burnished ware begin to emerge between 7500 and 6500 BCE. They also advanced the idea of a transitional stage between the PPNA and PPNB between 8800 and 8600 BCE at sites like Jerf el Ahmar and Tell Aswad.

Southern Mesopotamia

Alluvial plains (Sumer/Elam). Little rainfall makes irrigation systems necessary. Ubaid culture from 5500 BC.

North Africa

Domestication of sheep and goats reached Egypt from the Near East possibly as early as 6000 BC. Graeme Barker states "The first indisputable evidence for domestic plants and animals in the Nile valley is not until the early fifth millennium bc in northern Egypt and a thousand years later further south, in both cases as part of strategies that still relied heavily on fishing, hunting, and the gathering of wild plants" and suggests that these subsistence changes were not due to farmers migrating from the Near East but was an indigenous development, with cereals either indigenous or obtained through exchange. Other scholars argue that the primary stimulus for agriculture and domesticated animals (as well as mud-brick architecture and other Neolithic cultural features) in Egypt was from the Middle East.

Europe

In southeast Europe agrarian societies first appeared by c. 7000 BC, and in Central Europe by ca. 5500 BC. Among the earliest cultural complexes of this area are included the Sesklo culture in Thessaly, which later expanded in the Balkans giving Starčevo-Körös (Cris), Linearbandkeramik, and Vinča. Through a combination of cultural diffusion and migration of peoples, the Neolithic traditions spread west and northwards to reach northwestern Europe by around 4500 BC. The Vinča culture may have created the earliest system of writing, the Vinča signs, though it is almost universally accepted amongst archeologists that the Sumerian cuneiform script was the earliest true form of writing and the Vinča signs most likely represented pictograms and ideograms rather than a truly developed form of writing. The Cucuteni-Trypillian culture built enormous settlements in Romania, Moldova and Ukraine from 5300 to 2300 BC. The megalithic temple complexes of Ġgantija on the Mediterranean island of Gozo (in the Maltese archipelago) and of Mnajdra (Malta) are notable for their gigantic Neolithic structures, the oldest of which date back to c. 3600 BC. The Hypogeum of Ħal-Saflieni, Paola, Malta, is a subterranean structure excavated c. 2500 BC; originally a sanctuary, it became a necropolis, the only prehistoric underground temple in the world, and showing a degree of artistry in stone sculpture unique in prehistory to the Maltese islands.

South and East Asia

The earliest Neolithic site in South Asia is Mehrgarh, dated to 7500 BCE, in the Kachi plain of Baluchistan, Pakistan; the site has evidence of farming (wheat and barley) and herding (cattle, sheep and goats).

In South India, the Neolithic began by 3000 BC and lasted until around 1400 BC when the Megalithic transition period began. South Indian Neolithic is characterized by Ashmounds since 2500 BC in Karnataka region, expanded later to Tamil Nadu.

In East Asia, the earliest sites include Pengtoushan culture around 7500 BC to 6100 BC, Peiligang culture around 7000 BC to 5000 BC.

The 'Neolithic' (defined in this paragraph as using polished stone implements) remains a living tradition in small and extremely remote and inaccessible pockets of West Papua (Indonesian New Guinea). Polished stone adze and axes are used in the present day ( CE) in areas where the availability of metal implements is limited. This is likely to cease altogether in the next few years as the older generation die off and steel blades and chainsaws prevail.

America

In Mesoamerica, a similar set of events (i.e., crop domestication and sedentary lifestyles) occurred by around 4500 BC, but possibly as early as 11,000–10,000 BC, although here the term "Pre-Classic" (or Formative) is used instead of mid-late Neolithic, the term Archaic Era for the Early Neolithic, and Paleo-Indian for the preceding period, though these cultures are usually not referred to as belonging to the Neolithic.

Social organization

During most of the Neolithic age, people lived in small tribes composed of multiple bands or lineages. There is little scientific evidence of developed social stratification in most Neolithic societies; social stratification is more associated with the later Bronze Age. Although some late Neolithic societies formed complex stratified chiefdoms similar to Polynesian societies such as the Ancient Hawaiians, most Neolithic societies were relatively simple and egalitarian. However, Neolithic societies were noticeably more hierarchical than the Paleolithic cultures that preceded them and hunter-gatherer cultures in general The domestication of animals (c. 8000 BC) resulted in a dramatic increase in social inequality. Possession of livestock allowed competition between households and resulted in inherited inequalities of wealth. Neolithic pastoralists who controlled large herds gradually acquired more livestock, and this made economic inequalities more pronounced. However, evidence of social inequality is still disputed, as settlements such as Catal Huyuk reveal a striking lack of difference in the size of homes and burial sites, suggesting a more egalitarian society with no evidence of the concept of capital, although some homes do appear slightly larger or more elaborately decorated than others.

Families and households were still largely independent economically, and the household was probably the center of life. However, excavations in Central Europe have revealed that early Neolithic Linear Ceramic cultures ("''Linearbandkeramik''") were building large arrangements of circular ditches between 4800 BC and 4600 BC. These structures (and their later counterparts such as causewayed enclosures, burial mounds, and henge) required considerable time and labour to construct, which suggests that some influential individuals were able to organise and direct human labour — though non-hierarchical and voluntary work remain strong possibilities.

There is a large body of evidence for fortified settlements at ''Linearbandkeramik'' sites along the Rhine, as at least some villages were fortified for some time with a palisade and an outer ditch. Settlements with palisades and weapon-traumatized bones have been discovered, such as at Herxheim, which, whether the site of a massacre or of a martial ritual, demonstrates "...systematic violence between groups." and warfare was probably much more common during the Neolithic than in the preceding Paleolithic period. This supplanted an earlier view of the Linear Pottery Culture as living a "peaceful, unfortified lifestyle."

Control of labour and inter-group conflict is characteristic of corporate-level or 'tribal' groups, headed by a charismatic individual; whether a 'big man' or a proto-chief, functioning as a lineage-group head. Whether a non-hierarchical system of organization existed is debatable and there is no evidence that explicitly suggests that Neolithic societies functioned under any dominating class or individual, as was the case in the chiefdoms of the European Early Bronze Age. Theories to explain the apparent implied egalitarianism of Neolithic (and Paleolithic) societies have arisen, notably the Marxist concept of primitive communism.

Shelter

The shelter of the early people changed dramatically from the paleolithic to the neolithic era. In the paleolithic, people did not normally live in permanent constructions. In the neolithic, mud brick houses started appearing that were coated with plaster. The growth of agriculture made permanent houses possible. Doorways were made on the roof, with ladders positioned both on the inside and outside of the houses. The roof was supported by beams from the inside. The rough ground was covered by platforms, mats, and skins on which residents slept.

Farming

A significant and far-reaching shift in human subsistence and lifestyle was to be brought about in areas where crop farming and cultivation were first developed: the previous reliance on an essentially nomadic hunter-gatherer subsistence technique or pastoral transhumance was at first supplemented, and then increasingly replaced by, a reliance upon the foods produced from cultivated lands. These developments are also believed to have greatly encouraged the growth of settlements, since it may be supposed that the increased need to spend more time and labor in tending crop fields required more localized dwellings. This trend would continue into the Bronze Age, eventually giving rise to towns, and later cities and state whose larger populations could be sustained by the increased productivity from cultivated lands.

The profound differences in human interactions and subsistence methods associated with the onset of early agricultural practices in the Neolithic have been called the ''Neolithic Revolution'', a term coined in the 1920s by the Australian archaeologist Vere Gordon Childe.

One potential benefit of the development and increasing sophistication of farming technology was the possibility of producing surplus crop yields, in other words, food supplies in excess of the immediate needs of the community. Surpluses could be stored for later use, or possibly traded for other necessities or luxuries. Agricultural life afforded securities that pastoral life could not, and sedentary farming populations grew faster than nomadic.

However, early farmers were also adversely affected in times of famine, such as may be caused by drought or pests. In instances where agriculture had become the predominant way of life, the sensitivity to these shortages could be particularly acute, affecting agrarian populations to an extent that otherwise may not have been routinely experienced by prior hunter-gatherer communities.

Jericho in West bank, Neolithic from around 8350 BC, arising from the earlier Epipaleolithic Natufian culture

Nevali Cori in Turkey, c. 8000 BC

Ganj Dareh in Iran, c. 7000 BC

Çatalhöyük in Turkey, 7500 BC

Pengtoushan culture in China, 7500 – 6100 BC

'Ain Ghazal in Jordan, 7250–5000 BC

Chogha Bonut in Iran, 7200 BC

Jhusi in India, 7100 BC

Karanovo in Bulgaria, 6200 BC

Petnica in Serbia, 6000 BC

Sesklo in Greece, 6850 BC (with a ±660 year margin of error)

Dispilio in Greece, c. 5500 BC

Padah-Lin Caves in Myanmar, c. 6000 BC

Jiahu in China, 7000 to 5800 BC

Mehrgarh in Pakistan, 7000 BC

Knossus on Crete, c. 7000 BC

Porodin in Republic of Macedonia, 6500 BC Vrshnik (Anzabegovo) in Republic of Macedonia, 6500 BC

Pizzo di Bodi (Varese), Lombardy in Italy, c. 6320 ±80 BC

Sammardenchia in Friuli, Italy, c. 6050 ±90 BC,

Cucuteni-Trypillian culture, 5500–2750 BC, in Ukraine, Moldova and Romania first salt works

Tabon Cave Complex in Quezon, Palawan, Philippines 5000 – 2000 BC

Hemudu culture in China, 5000 – 4500 BC, large scale rice plantation

around 2000 settlements of Trypillian culture, 5400 – 2800 BC

Tell Zeidan in northern Syria, from about 5500 to 4000 BC.

The Megalithic Temples of Malta, 3600 BC

Knap of Howar and Skara Brae, Orkney, Scotland, from 3500 BC and 3100 BC respectively

Brú na Bóinne in Ireland, c. 3500 BC

Lough Gur in Ireland from around 3000 BC

Lajia in China, 2000 BC

The world's oldest known engineered roadway, the Sweet Track in England, dates from 3800 BC and the world's oldest free-standing structure is the neolithic temple of Ggantija in Gozo, Malta.

List of cultures and sites

''Note: Dates are very approximate, and are only given for a rough estimate; consult each culture for specific pie time periods.''

Early Neolithic ''Periodization: The Levant: 10,000 to 8500 BC; Europe: 5000 to 4000 BC; Elsewhere: varies greatly, depending on region.''

Beixin culture

Cishan culture

Dudeşti culture

Franchthi Cave people

*Earliest European Neolithic site: 20th to 3rd millennium BC

Sesclo village culture

Starcevo-Criş culture

*(also known as the Starčevo-Körös-Criş culture)

Middle Neolithic ''Periodization: The Levant: 8500 to 6500 BC; Europe: 4000 to 3500 BC; Elsewhere: varies greatly, depending on region.''

Baodun culture

*Jinsha settlement and Sanxingdui mound.

Cardium Pottery culture

Comb Ceramic culture

Corded Ware culture

Cortaillod culture

Cucuteni-Trypillian culture

Dadiwan culture

Dawenkou culture

Daxi culture

*Chengtoushan settlement

Grooved ware people

*Skara Brae, et al.

Erlitou culture

*Xia Dynasty

Ertebølle culture

Hembury culture

Hemudu culture

Hongshan culture

Houli culture

Horgen culture

Liangzhu culture

Linear Pottery culture

*Goseck circle, et al.

Longshan culture

Majiabang culture

Majiayao culture

Peiligang culture

Pengtoushan culture

Pfyn culture

Precucuteni culture

Qujialing culture

Shijiahe culture

Trypillian culture

Vinča culture

Windmill Hill culture

*Stonehenge

Xinglongwa culture

*Beifudi site

Xinle culture

Yangshao culture

*Banpo and Xishuipo settlements.

Zhaobaogou culture

Later Neolithic ''Periodization: 6500 to 4500 BC; Europe: 3500 to 3000 BC; Elsewhere: varies greatly, depending on region.''

Eneolithic ''Periodization: Middle East: 4500 to 3300 BC; Europe: 3000 to 1700 BC; Elsewhere: varies greatly, depending on region. In the Americas, the Eneolithic ended as late as the 1800s for some people.''

Beaker culture

Cucuteni-Trypillian culture

Funnelbeaker culture

Gaudo Culture

Lengyel culture

Varna culture

See also

Megalith

Neolithic Europe

Neolithic Revolution

Neolithic religion

Neolithic tomb

Ötzi the Iceman

Synoptic table of the principal old world prehistoric cultures

Paleolithic

Rock art of the Djelfa region

Footnotes

Bibliography

External links

Current Directions in West African Prehistory - McIntosh & McIntosh (1983)

Vincha Neolithic Script

UB Préhistoire — Enseignements sur le Néolithique

Category:Holocene Category:Greek loanwords

ar:عصر حجري حديث an:Neolitico ast:Neolíticu az:Neolit dövrü bn:নিওলিথিক ba:Неолит bs:Neolitik br:Neolitik bg:Новокаменна епоха ca:Neolític cv:Неолит cs:Neolit da:Yngre stenalder de:Jungsteinzeit et:Neoliitikum el:Νεολιθική περίοδος es:Neolítico eo:Neolitiko eu:Neolito fa:دوران نوسنگی fr:Néolithique fy:Neolitikum ga:Neoiliteach gl:Neolítico ko:신석기 시대 hi:नवपाषाण युग (नियोलिथिक) hr:Mlađe kameno doba id:Neolitik is:Nýsteinöld it:Neolitico he:תקופת האבן החדשה jv:Neolitik ka:ნეოლითის ხანა kk:Неолит la:Neolithicum lv:Neolīts lt:Neolitas hu:Újkőkorszak mk:Неолит ml:നവീനശിലായുഗം mt:Neolitiku ms:Zaman Neolitik my:ကျောက်ခေတ်သစ် nl:Neolithicum nds-nl:Neolithicum ja:新石器時代 no:Neolittisk tid nn:Yngre steinalder oc:Neolitic pnb:نیولتھک pl:Neolit pt:Neolítico ro:Neolitic ru:Неолит sq:Neoliti scn:Neuliticu simple:Neolithic sk:Neolit sl:Neolitik sr:Неолит sh:Neolit fi:Neoliittinen kausi sv:Neolitikum th:ยุคหินใหม่ tr:Cilalı Taş Devri uk:Неоліт ur:نیولتھک ug:يېڭى تاش قۇرال دەۋرى zh-yue:新石器時代 zh:新石器时代

Shomarka Omar Yahya Keita M.D., DPhil., is an American physician and anthropologist. He is affiliated with the National Human Genome Center of Howard University and the Department of Anthropology of the Smithsonian Institution.

He has been interested in the origins of the concepts of race, the misconception of human variation as race, and the scientific approaches to the biocultural origins and histories of indigenous African peoples.

Career

Keita completed his medical training at Howard University and received an M.D. degree. He studied taxonomy and evolutionary biology with S.T. Hussain and D. Domning in the anatomy department, as well as skeletal biology with the late J. Lawrence (Larry) Angel of the Smithsonian Institution. He received his D. Phil. which is equivalent to a PhD in the United States in biological anthropology from Oxford University where his supervisors were scholars, A.J.(Anthony) Boyce (biological anthropology) and John Baines (Egyptology).

Keita's career has primarily been in public sector medicine, but has included academic teaching and research. He is a member of the American Academy of Developmental Medicine and Dentistry, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the American Anthropological Association (AAA), the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, the Physicians for Human Rights, the NAACP, and the Royal African Society, among others.

His papers, writings and planned projects reflect an eclectic and broad range of interests, including craniofacial phenetic affinity in ancient northwest Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, BiDil—and the dangers of biological determinism in US health policy, intellectual and developmental disabilities. His interests in the biology of poverty and its impact on human development has increased since the MRDDA experience. Other interests include the US census instructions as a creator of identity and the inaccuracies in this approach, human biological diversity, ancestry testing for "identity", phenetic affinity, and paleopathology.

Genetics, linguistics, and history in Africa—and the history of ideas about Africa and anthropology that continue to have influence, the misuse of genetics, bioethics and the (mis)concept of race, and science in the service of justice are also of interest. He has served as a consultant to museums, and given lectures and workshops on human variation and the idea of "race"--and how these differ from each other, human biological diversity in indigenous Africa, and the origins of ancient Egypt using the most current scientific data.

Views on African anthropology

In interview he speaks to the endogenous development of African peoples known from history and in the ethnographic present, foreign groups that have become Africanized, African groups that have changed identities or language, and notes confusion around the concept of peoples vs that of biological lineages and purely biological aspects of populations, and language affinity. Sampling is not consistent in the literature; samples are often not true equivalents, something that plagues population genetics research that delves into efforts at history. Keita stresses the need for a critical approach to population history that makes a distinction between biogenesis and ethnogenesis, and acknowledges the problems of past scholarship from multiple disciplines. He is very concerned about the persistence of racial thinking and the commitment that many seem to have to the term "race", which is inappropriate as a descriptor of any human population. Keita agrees with Howells that there are/were populations but no races.

Awards

Ford Foundation Fellowship to study at the American University in Cairo, Egypt

Upjohn Award for Research, Howard University College of Medicine

Overseas Research Student Award from the Vice Chancellors and Principals of Colleges and Universities in the United Kingdom.

Publications

S.O.Y. Keita, African Archaeological Review (2005): Exploring Northeast African Metric Craniofacial Variation at the Individual Level: A Comparative Study Using Principal Components Analysis,

S.O.Y. Keita, American Journal of Human Biology (2004): Studies of Ancient Crania From Northern Africa,

S.O.Y. Keita, American Journal of Physical Anthropology (1990): Genetics, Egypt, and History: Interpreting Geographical Patterns of Y Chromosome Variation

S.O.Y. Keita & A. J. Boyce, History in Africa, 32 pp. 221–246 (2005)

Early Nile Valley Farmers, From El-Badari, Aboriginals or “European” Agro-Nostratic Immigrants? Craniometric Affinities Considered With Other Data, S.O.Y. Keita, Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 191–208 (2005)

History in the Interpretation of the Pattern of p49a,f TaqI RFLP Y-Chromosome Variation in Egypt: A Consideration of Multiple Lines of Evidence, S.O.Y. Keita, American Journal of Human Biology, 17: 559–567 (2005)

Further Studies of Crania From Ancient Northern Africa: An Analysis of Crania From First Dynasty Egyptian Tombs, Using Multiple Discriminant Functions, S.O.Y. Keita, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 87: 245-254 (1992)

The Persistence of Racial Thinking and the Myth of Racial Divergence, S.O.Y. Keita and Rick A. Kittles, American Anthropologist (1997)

Studies and Comments on Ancient Egyptian Biological Relationships, S.O.Y. Keita, History in Africa, 20: 129-154 (1993): The Origins of Afroasiatic, Ehret, Keita and Newman, Science (2004)

Conceptualizing Human Variation, S.O.Y. Keita, Nature Genetics Supplement (2004)

Diachronic Patterns of Dental Hypoplasias and Vault Porosities During the Predynastic in the Naqada Region, Upper Egypt, S.O.Y. Keita, A.J. Boyce (2001)

Forensic Misclassification of Ancient Nubian Crania: Implications for Assumptions About Human Variation, Frank L'Engle_Williams, Robert L. Belcher, George J. Armelago's, Current Anthropology. (2005)

An Analysis of Crania From Tell-Duweir Using Multiple Discriminant Functions, S.O.Y. Keita, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 75: 375-390 (1988)

Interpreting African Genetic Diversity, S.O.Y. Keita & Rick Kittles, African Archaeological Review, Vol. 16, No. 2 (1999)

“Race”: Confusion About Zoological and Social Taxonomies, and Their Places in Science, S.O.Y. Keita, A.J. Boyce, Field Museum of Chicago Institute of Biological Anthropology, Oxford University, American Journal of Human Biology, 13: 569–575 (2001)

Royal Incest and Diffusion in Africa, S.O.Y. Keita, American Ethnologist, Vol. 8. No. 2 (1981)

S.O.Y Keita, "BiDil and the Possibility of a Resurgent Racial Biology and Medicine," Anthropology News, April 2006, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 31–31

References

Category:African American academics Category:American anthropologists Category:Living people Category:Howard University alumni Category:Alumni of the University of Oxford Category:Fellows of the American Association for the Advancement of Science Category:Howard University faculty Category:Smithsonian Institution people