Preface: Before 2012 once again embroils us fully into the ongoing saga of the eurozone’s Crisis and its global ramifications, I thought it might be a good idea to start the year on a reflective mood. The topic I chose is complexity and the inadequate responses to it that have landed us in a mire of our own making; a Crisis that could have been defeated during 2011, and that it is still possible to stop on its tracks in 2012. Yet a Crisis which will probably be allowed to run its terrible course, with hideous consequences for Europe and the world, as a result of a motivated flight from rational responses to a complex, yet not insoluble, problem.
Introduction: Complexity is the stuff of existence and its proper acknowledgment a prerequisite for a successful life. Our problematic relation with complexity has been a cause of many a calamity, the Crash of 2008 and its aftermath (especially here in the eurozone) being a case in point.
Wherever we look, and the Earth’s environment is not a bad place to start, humanity has struggled to come to terms with complex systems. Economies, the archetypal human artifact, are even more notorious than ecologies for evolving in ways that humans cannot grasp by means of our run-of-the-mill, pacifying, oversimplifying models. And when our actions, policies and choices, based as they tend to be on such models, give rise to meltdowns, crises and stubborn failures, we have a tendency to move to the other extreme; the one I like to label Complexity Fetishism’. It seems to me that the great challenge for 2012 is to find ways of plotting a course that avoids the pitfalls of both Complexity Denial and Complexity Fetishism.
This four-part series of posts will comprise the following installments.
Part A: The analytic-synthetic approach to socio-economic systems as a form of Complexity Denial
Part B: The political lure of naive models in the era of financialisation
Part C: Crisis and the temptation of Complexity Fetishism: The eurozone case
Part D: A challenge for 2012: How to transcend the sterile confrontation of Hayekians, Keynesians and Marxists
Today we begin with Part A. Parts B,C and D will be added in regular intervals within January.
Part A – The analytic-synthetic approach to socio-economic systems as a form of Complexity Denial Continue reading →
Recent Comments