Friday, January 13, 2012 - 16:42
Roderick T. Long
As previously mentioned, the Society of Political Economy met in 1849 to critique Molinari’s market anarchist ideas. A month later, one of the participants in that discussion, free-banking theorist Charles Coquelin, developed his objections further in a book review of Molinari’s Soirées on the Rue Saint-Lazare for the Journal des Économistes. I have now translated and posted Coquelin’s review also.
These two pieces are especially important as the first critiques ever published (AFAIK) of the idea that the legitimate functions of government could and should be turned over to market mechanisms.
Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 23:12
Jonathan J. Bean
“Tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right.� “Wherever law ends, tyranny begins.�
—John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government
“The historian is . . . one step nearer to direct power over public opinion than is the theorist.�
—Friedrich von Hayek
Man of the Year (2009)
Say what you will, but the Fed certainly has chutzpah: driving interest rates to zero, printing money, and now...
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - 12:00
Roderick T. Long
In 1849, the members of the Society of Political Economy – the chief organisation for classical liberalism in France at the time – met to discuss Molinari’s proposal for the competitive provision of security. The meeting included some of the foremost liberal thinkers of the day, such as Bastiat, Dunoyer, Coquelin, Wolowski, and Horace Say (son of J.-B.). Without exception they agreed that Molinari’s ideas were unworkable, offering much the same objections to market anarchism as those that are prevalent today. (Although, oddly, nobody raised the objection that would later lead Molinari himself to moderate his position, namely the problem of so-called “public goods.�) Even Dunoyer, who in his earlier work...
Monday, January 9, 2012 - 12:59
Sheldon Richman
Sunday, January 8, 2012 - 20:09
David T. Beito
Saturday, January 7, 2012 - 17:18
Robert Higgs
I wrote recently about some views expressed by Elizabeth Warren and certain politicos of a previous era to the effect that the government has every right to take at least a big chunk of your earnings and, in some expressions, even your entire earnings for purposes the rulers stipulate.
Nearly ten years ago, the great political philosopher Anthony de Jasay wrote a charming little essay related to this matter called “Your Dog Owns Your House.� There, he spells out some of the ways in which such sweeping claims—by your dog or the rulers—are incoherent, absurd, and indefensible, and he sketches...
Friday, January 6, 2012 - 10:53
Lester Hunt
This is a very interesting article on the OWS movement by the psychologist Jonathan Haidt.
I've been following his work at a distance for some years now. He and his colleagues analyse real-world moral thinking based on "six clusters of moral concerns": "care/harm [eg., compassion for the underdog],...
Wednesday, January 4, 2012 - 07:54
Keith Halderman
Over sixty years ago General Dwight Eisenhower warned us that our nations leaders had plans for us that included perpetual warfare and growing debt slavery. Since then Barack Obama and all of the Republican candidates for President except Ron Paul have tried to make this warning a reality. The corrupt and lying news media have done their best to aid in this effort. however the voters in Iowa have made their constantly repeated mantra, that Ron Paul can not be elected, ring hollow. Ron Paul has given the American people something they have lacked for for decades, a viable candidate who wants peace. But he and his supporters like myself are not going to be able to stop this useless carnage by ourselves, we need your help. As...
Tuesday, January 3, 2012 - 12:32
David T. Beito
Sunday, January 1, 2012 - 10:06
Keith Halderman
When Barack Obama wanted to get rid of Osama Bin Laden, arguably the largest victory in the War on Terror to date, he handled the situation the same way Adolf Hitler or Joe Stalin would have, he just went out and killed him. Obama gave up the golden chance to show that we were still different, to prove to our enemies, our friends, and the whole world that no matter how provoked we continued to be a nation of laws, not a nation of men. My cousin was a firefighter in Queens New York and he died on September 11th when one of the towers collapsed on his headso I do not mourn the death of Osama Bin Laden with even a single tear. I do however regret the passing of an American exceptionalism that has kept us free and safer for hundreds of years. We are...
Saturday, December 31, 2011 - 16:47
Sheldon Richman
It’s themselves.
Paul’s candidacy forces progressives to face the hideous positions and actions of their candidate, of the person they want to empower for another four years. If [Ron] Paul were not in the race or were not receiving attention, none of these issues would receive any attention because all the other major GOP candidates either agree with Obama on these matters or hold even worse views….
Paul scrambles the comfortable ideological and partisan categories and forces progressives to confront and account for the policies they are working to protect. His nomination would mean that it is the Republican candidate — not the Democrat — who would be the anti-war, pro-due-process, pro-transparency, anti-Fed, anti-Wall-...
Thursday, December 29, 2011 - 13:05
Robert Higgs
Elizabeth Warren, the Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate in Massachusetts, recently created a media flap when she said:
There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there — good for you!
But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did. Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or...
Wednesday, December 28, 2011 - 13:36
Amy H. Sturgis
Lifted/quoted from Ed Morrissey at Hot Air:
The great people at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) have a new video out this week recapping one of their most prominent victories over censorship in Academia — prominent because this case found a ready-made constituency of activists for individual rights. Fans of Firefly rushed to defend University of Wisconsin Professor James Miller after he was accused by campus police of creating...
Tuesday, December 27, 2011 - 17:25
Roderick T. Long
I'm dissolving in the economic organism!
Newly translated and added to the Molinari Institute online library: an excerpt from chapter 10 of Gustave de Molinari’s 1888 Political Evolution and the Revolution. This extract includes the following passage, whose wording – despite its dismissive...
Sunday, December 25, 2011 - 18:10
Sheldon Richman
I hope to say more about this, but I wanted to draw attention to this passage in Barack Obama’s remarks to troops regarding the end of the war in Iraq.
The war in Iraq will soon belong to history. Your service belongs to the ages. Never forget that you are part of...
Friday, December 23, 2011 - 17:42
Sheldon Richman
Tuesday, December 20, 2011 - 10:09
Sheldon Richman
Someone posted this on Facebook. I thought it was worth passing along.
Friday, December 16, 2011 - 14:45
Sheldon Richman
Anyone who thinks there's anything to celebrate about the U.S. involvement in Iraq hasn't been paying attention. Even the "exit" is essentially a lie. The Pentagon calls it "reposturing."
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 - 16:05
Roderick T. Long
I want to talk a bit a bit some of the ways in which left-libertarian claims are susceptible of misinterpretation. (Note: when I use the term “right-libertarian� below, I mean “libertarians who deviate rightward from the C4SS/ALL plumbline�!)
1. Right-libertarians sometimes accuse left-libertarians of misrepresenting right-libertarians’ relation to corporatism. “They say we support government favouritism toward big business,� they complain, “yet no libertarian supports any such thing.�
To answer this, I need to invoke the de re / de dicto distinction.
...