We made a rare trip out to see a grown up film the other night and we picked a good ‘un. Frost/Nixon is based on the play of the same name and examines David Frost’s ultimately successful attempts to secure an exclusive series of interviews with disgraced former American President Richard Nixon.
At its heart, Frost/Nixon is a tale that’s been told a thousand times before, from ‘Rocky’ to ‘Kung Fu Panda’ – that of the underdog struggling to overcome a superior foe. But for all that, the scenario is quite refreshing in that it is far more cerebral than visceral.
At the movie’s heart is Frank Langella’s portrayal of Nixon. Particularly in the gripping final interview scene, Langella’s portrayal rings true. In the movie Nixon is motivated both by a desire to repair his tattered image and the prospect of a large cheque for doing so. When it all falls apart at the end Langella even manages to win his character some sympathy from the audience.
Michael Sheen is good too as Frost the character in the movie and it must have helped that the two had played opposite each other in the play.
But Frost the character is the source of my one reservation about the film. To fit into the Rocky scenario, the early portrayal of Frost is not flattering – he’s portrayed as a lightweight talk show host, who is out of his depth. He does not seek the interviews for the principled motives of researcher James Reston, but rather in pursuit of Stateside fame. Which makes his transition to incisive interviewer (with the help of a fictional telephone conversation with Nixon) somewhat less credible.
There are hints in the film of Frost’s credentials (most notably when Frost hires Reston against the advice of John Birt) but the big step up is definitely of Rocky proportions. Which of course is the intention. It’s something of a shame because in itself the battle of wits between Nixon and Frost is great drama in itself. Add in the fact that the difficulties in attracting finance and the prospects of Frost being ruined professionally and financial were very real indeed means that there’s potentially motivation aplenty without resorting to stereotypes.
These types of historical dramas always fascinate me – how much is real and how much is fiction? It’s to the writer’s credit that the movie probably feels more accurate than it actually is. The truth has been embellished in the name of dramatic licence. But in the end Frost/Nixon is a movie, not a documentary, and on those terms it is excellent.
Here’s the trailer for the movie which features prominently the lighter side of the script.