Area | |
---|---|
Population | 580,086,590 (countries) + 12 m aprox (dependencies) |
Density | |
Gdp | US$4.512.784 (2010) |
Demonym | Latin American, American |
Countries | 20 |
Dependencies | 10 |
Languages | Spanish, Portuguese, Quechua, Mayan languages, Guaraní, French, Aymara, Nahuatl, Italian and others. |
Time | UTC-2 to UTC-8 |
Cities | 1. Mexico City 2. São Paulo 3. Buenos Aires4. Rio de Janeiro 5. Lima6. Bogotá7. Santiago8. Belo Horizonte 9. Guadalajara10. Caracas }} |
In contemporary usage: In one sense, Latin America refers to territories in America where the Spanish or Portuguese languages prevail: Mexico, most of Central and South America, and in the Caribbean, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico — in summary, Hispanic America and Brazil. Latin America is, therefore, defined as all those parts of the Americas that were once part of the Spanish and Portuguese Empires. By this definition, Latin America is coterminous with Iberoamerica'' ("Iberian America"). Particularly in the United States, the term more broadly refers to all of the Americas south of the United States, thus including: English-speaking countries such as Belize, Jamaica, Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, Antigua and Barbuda, St. Lucia, Dominica, Grenada, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and the Bahamas; French-speaking Haiti and Martinique, Guadeloupe, French Guiana; and the Dutch-speaking Netherlands Antilles, Aruba and Suriname. (In the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba, Papiamento – a predominantly Iberian-derived creole language – is spoken by the majority of the population.) This definition emphasizes a similar socioeconomic history of the region, which was characterized by formal or informal colonialism, rather than cultural aspects. (See, for example, dependency theory.) As such, some sources avoid this oversimplification by using the phrase "Latin America and the Caribbean" instead, as in the United Nations geoscheme for the Americas. In a more literal definition, which remains faithful to the original usage, Latin America designates all of those countries and territories in the Americas where a Romance language (i.e., languages derived from Latin, and hence the name of the region) is spoken: Spanish, Portuguese, and French, and the creole languages based upon these. Although French-influenced areas of the Americas would include Quebec, this region is rarely considered to be part of Latin America, since its history, distinctive culture and economy, and British-inspired political institutions are generally deemed too closely intertwined with the rest of Canada.
The distinction between Latin America and Anglo-America, which can be criticized for stressing only the European heritage of these regions (that is, for Eurocentrism), is a convention based on the predominant languages in the Americas by which Romance-language and English-speaking cultures are distinguished. Neither area is culturally or linguistically homogeneous; in substantial portions of Latin America (e.g., highland Ecuador, Bolivia, Guatemala, and Paraguay), American Indian cultures and, to a lesser extent, Amerindian languages, are predominant, and in other areas, the influence of African cultures is strong (e.g., the Caribbean basin—including parts of Colombia and Venezuela)—and the coastal areas of Ecuador and Brazil.
The region was home to many indigenous peoples and advanced civilizations, including the Aztecs, Toltecs, Caribs, Tupi, Maya, and Inca. The golden age of the Maya began about 250, with the last two great civilizations, the Aztecs and Incas, emerging into prominence later on in the early fourteenth century and mid-fifteenth centuries, respectively. The Aztec empire was ultimately the most powerful civilization known throughout the Americas, until its downfall in part by the Spanish invasion.
With the arrival of the Europeans following Christopher Columbus's voyages, the indigenous elites, such as the Incas and Aztecs, lost power to the heavy European invasion. Hernándo Cortés seized the Aztec elite's power with the help of local groups who did not favor the Aztec elite, and Francisco Pizarro eliminated the Incan rule in Western South America. The European powers of Spain and Portugal colonized the region, which along with the rest of the uncolonized world, was divided into areas of Spanish and Portuguese control by the line of demarcation in 1493, which gave Spain all areas to the west, and Portugal all areas to the east (the Portuguese lands in South America subsequently becoming Brazil). By the end of the sixteenth century Spain and Portugal had been joined by others, including France, in occupying large areas of North, Central and South America, ultimately extending from Alaska to the southern tips of the Patagonia. European culture, customs and government were introduced, with the Roman Catholic Church becoming the major economic and political power to overrule the traditional ways of the region, eventually becoming the only official religion of the Americas during this period.
Epidemics of diseases brought by the Europeans, such as smallpox and measles, wiped out a large portion of the indigenous population. Historians cannot determine the number of natives who died due to European diseases, but some put the figures as high as 85% and as low as 25%. Due to the lack of written records, specific numbers are hard to verify. Many of the survivors were forced to work in European plantations and mines. Intermixing between the indigenous peoples and the European colonists was very common, and, by the end of the colonial period, people of mixed ancestry (mestizos) formed majorities in several colonies.
By the end of the eighteenth century, Spanish and Portuguese power waned on the global scene as other European powers took their place, notably Britain and France. Resentment grew among the majority of the population in Latin America over the restrictions imposed by the Spanish government, as well as the dominance of native Spaniards (Iberian-born Peninsulares) in the major social and political institutions. Napoleon's invasion of Spain in 1808 marked a turning point, compelling Criollo elites to form juntas that advocated independence. Also, the newly independent Haiti, the second oldest nation in the New World after the United States and the oldest independent nation in Latin America, further fueled the independence movement by inspiring the leaders of the movement, such as Simón Bolívar of Venezuela, José de San Martín of Argentina and Bernardo O'Higgins of Chile, and by providing them with considerable munitions and troops.
Fighting soon broke out between juntas and the Spanish colonial authorities, with initial victories for the advocates of independence. Eventually these early movements were crushed by the royalist troops by 1812, including those of Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla in Mexico and Francisco de Miranda in Venezuela. Under the leadership of a new generation of leaders, such as Simón Bolívar "The Liberator", José de San Martín of Argentina, Bernardo O'Higgins of Chile, and other Libertadores in South America, the independence movement regained strength, and by 1825, all Spanish America, except for Puerto Rico and Cuba, had gained independence from Spain. Brazil achieved independence with a constitutional monarchy established in 1822. In the same year in Mexico, a military officer, Agustín de Iturbide, led a coalition of conservatives and liberals who created a constitutional monarchy, with Iturbide as emperor. This First Mexican Empire was short-lived, and was followed by the creation of a republic in 1823.
In the 1950s, the Cold War moved close to the United States, in Latin America. The nations of Latin America faced many critical problems, including widespread poverty and poor health care. The United States feared the politics of socialism and communism would be particularly appealing to the countries of Latin America. At the same time, many United States citizens worried about the threat to their own security and businesses in Latin America. This led the United States to take up a very aggressive military strategy of containment. Through the Cold War, the United States removed many democratically elected leaders of Latin American countries through covert CIA operations and replaced them with leaders who were more friendly to the United States' interests.
Arguably, this interference with the democratic system in these countries created a blowback because many Latin Americans rejected the United States involvement. Many of the leaders who were put into power positions by the United States became dictators and oppressors as well.
By the 1970s, leftists had acquired a significant political influence which prompted the right-wing, ecclesiastical authorities and a large portion of the individual country's upper class to support coup d'états to avoid what they perceived as a communist threat. This was further fueled by Cuban and United States intervention which led to a political polarization.
Many Latin American countries were in some part of the Cold War ruled by dictatorship, either of the left or right. Beginning in the 1980s and by the early 1990s, all countries had restored or achieved democracy except Cuba.
Many right-wing regimes were supported by the United States through the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance in the context of the Cold War. Around the 1970s, these regimes collaborated in Operation Condor killing many leftist dissidents, including some urban guerrillas.
The set of specific economic policy prescriptions that were considered the "standard" reform package were promoted for crisis-wracked developing countries by Washington, D.C.-based institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and the US Treasury Department during the 80s and 90s.
In recent years, several Latin American countries led by socialist or other left wing governments—including Argentina and Venezuela—have campaigned for (and to some degree adopted) policies contrary to the Washington Consensus set of policies. (Other Latin countries with governments of the left, including Brazil, Chile and Peru, have in practice adopted the bulk of the policies). Also critical of the policies as actually promoted by the International Monetary Fund have been some U.S. economists, such as Joseph Stiglitz and Dani Rodrik, who have challenged what are sometimes described as the "fundamentalist" policies of the International Monetary Fund and the US Treasury for what Stiglitz calls a "one size fits all" treatment of individual economies.
The term has become associated with neoliberal policies in general and drawn into the broader debate over the expanding role of the free market, constraints upon the state, and US influence on other countries' national sovereignty.
This politico-economical initiative was institutionalized in North America by the 1994 NAFTA, and elsewhere in the Americas through a series of like agreements. The comprehensive Free Trade Area of the Americas project, however, was rejected by most South American countries at the 2005 4th Summit of the Americas.
In most countries, since the 2000s left-wing political parties have risen to power. Hugo Chávez in Venezuela, Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, Fernando Lugo in Paraguay, Néstor Kirchner and his wife Cristina Fernández in Argentina, Tabaré Vázquez and José Mujica in Uruguay, the Ricardo Lagos and Michelle Bachelet governments in Chile, Evo Morales in Bolivia, Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, Manuel Zelaya in Honduras, Rafael Correa in Ecuador, and Mauricio Funes of El Salvador, are all part of this wave of left-wing politicians who also often declare themselves socialists, Latin Americanists, or anti-imperialists (often implying opposition to US policies towards the region). A development of this has been the creation of the eight-member ALBA alliance, or "The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America" (Spanish: Alianza Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra América).
In addition to the foregoing groups, Latin America also has millions of tri-racial people of African, Amerindian, and European ancestry. Most are found in Colombia, Venezuela, and Brazil, with a much smaller presence in other countries.
+ Ethnic distribution, in 2005< | – Population estimates, as of 2010 | |||||||||
Country | ! Population | ! Amerindians | White Latin American>Whites | ! Mestizos | ! Mulattos | Afro-Latin American>Blacks | ! Creole peoples | Asians | ||
40,134,425 | 1.0% | 85.0%| | 11.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.9% | |||
style="text-align:left;" | 10,907,778 | 15.0% | | | 28.0% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 0.4% | | | 53.8% | 0.0% | 39.1% | 6.2% | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 17,063,000 | 8.0%| | 52.7% | 39.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 45,393,050 | 1.3%| | 28.6% | 49.2% | 19.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 4,253,897 | 0.8%| | 82.0% | 15.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 0.2% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 11,236,444 | 0.0%| | 37.0% | 0.0% | 51.0% | 11.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 8,562,541 | 0.0%| | 14.6% | 0.0% | style="background:#E8E8E8">75.0% | 7.7%| | 2.3% | 0.4% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | < | 13,625,000 | 39.0%| | 9.9% | 41.0% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | |
style="text-align:left;" | 6,134,000 | 8.0% | style="background:#E8E8E8">91.0% | 0.0%| | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |||
style="text-align:left;" | < | 13,276,517 | 53.0%| | 4.0% | 42.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.8% | |
style="text-align:left;" | 7,810,848 | 7.7%| | 1.0% | 85.6% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 3.3% | 0.7% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 111,211,789 | 14.0%| | 15.0% | 70.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 5,891,199 | 6.9%| | 14.0% | 78.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 3,322,576 | 8.0%| | 10.0% | 32.0% | 27.0% | 5.0% | 14.0% | 4.0% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 6,349,000 | 1.5%| | 20.0% | 74.5% | 3.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 29,461,933 | 45.5%| | 12.0% | 32.0% | 9.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 3,967,179 | 0.0%| | 74.8% | 0.0% | 10.0% | 15.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 3,494,382 | 0.0% | style="background:#E8E8E8">88.0% | 8.0%| | 4.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | 26,814,843 | 2.7%| | 16.9% | 37.7% | 37.7% | 2.8% | 0.0% | 2.2% | ||
style="text-align:left;" | Total | 561,183,291 | 9.2%| | 36.1% | 30.3% | 20.3% | 3.2% | 0.2% | 0.7% |
Native American languages are widely spoken in Peru, Guatemala, Bolivia, Paraguay, and to a lesser degree, in Mexico, Panama, Ecuador, and Chile. In Latin American countries not named above, the population of speakers of indigenous languages is either small or non-existent.
In Peru, Quechua is an official language, alongside Spanish and any other indigenous language in the areas where they predominate. In Ecuador, while holding no official status, the closely related Quichua is a recognized language of the indigenous people under the country's constitution; however, it is only spoken by a few groups in the country's highlands. In Bolivia, Aymara, Quechua and Guaraní hold official status alongside Spanish. Guaraní, along with Spanish, is an official language of Paraguay, and is spoken by a majority of the population (who are, for the most part, bilingual), and it is co-official with Spanish in the Argentine province of Corrientes. In Nicaragua, Spanish is the official language, but on the country's Caribbean coast English and indigenous languages such as Miskito, Sumo, and Rama also hold official status. Colombia recognizes all indigenous languages spoken within its territory as official, though fewer than 1% of its population are native speakers of these languages. Nahuatl is one of the 62 native languages spoken by indigenous people in Mexico, which are officially recognized by the government as "national languages" along with Spanish.
Other European languages spoken in Latin America include: English, by some groups in Argentina, Nicaragua, Panama, and Puerto Rico, as well as in nearby countries that may or may not be considered Latin American, like Belize and Guyana (English is used as a major foreign language in Latin American commerce and education); German, in southern Brazil, southern Chile, Argentina, portions of northern Venezuela, and Paraguay; Italian, in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Venezuela; and Welsh, in southern Argentina. In several nations, especially in the Caribbean region, creole languages are spoken. The most widely spoken creole language in Latin America and the Caribbean is Haitian Creole, the predominant language of Haiti; it is derived primarily from French and certain West African tongues with some Amerindian and Spanish influences as well. Creole languages of mainland Latin America, similarly, are derived from European languages and various African tongues.
For the period 2000–2005, Chile, Costa Rica, Panama, and Venezuela were the only countries with global positive migration rates, in terms of their yearly averages.
Despite significant progress, education coverage remains unequal in Latin America. The region has made great progress in educational coverage; almost all children attend primary school and access to secondary education has increased considerably. Most educational systems in the region have implemented various types of administrative and institutional reforms that have enabled reach for places and communities that had no access to education services in the early 90's.
However, there are still 23 million children in the region between the ages of 4 and 17 outside of the formal education system. Estimates indicate that 30% of preschool age children (ages 4 –5) do not attend school, and for the most vulnerable populations, the poor and rural, - this calculation exceeds 40 percent. Among primary school age children (ages 6 to 12), coverage is almost universal; however there is still a need to incorporate 5 million children in the primary education system. These children live mostly in remote areas, are indigenous or Afro-descendants and live in extreme poverty.
Among people between the ages of 13 and 17 years, only 80% are full time students in the education system; among those, among them only 66% advance to secondary school. These percentages are lower among vulnerable population groups: only 75% of the poorest youth between the ages of 13 and 17 years attend school. Tertiary education has the lowest coverage, with only 70% of people between the ages of 18 and 25 years outside of the education system. Currently, more than half of low income children or living in rural areas fail to complete nine years of education.
Crime and violence prevention and public security are now important issues for governments and citizens in Latin America and the Caribbean region. In 2004, violence was the main cause of death in Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, El Salvador, Mexico and Honduras. Homicide rates in Latin America are among the highest in the world. From the early 1980s through the mid-1990s, homicide rates increased by 50 percent. The major victims of such homicides are young men, 69 percent of whom are between the ages of 15 and 19 years old. Many analysts agree that the prison crisis will not be resolved until the gap between rich and poor is addressed. They say that growing social inequality is fuelling crime in the region. But there is also no doubt that, on such an approach, Latin American countries still have a long way to go. Countries with the highest homicide rate per year per 100,000 inhabitants were: Guatemala 57.9, El Salvador 49.1, Venezuela 48, Honduras 59, Colombia 33, Belize 30.8, Brazil 25.7, Dominican Republic 23.56, Puerto Rico 18.8, and Ecuador 16.9. More than 500,000 people have been killed by firearms in Brazil between 1979 and 2003. Cuba has the lowest crime rate in the western hemisphere. Havana is often regarded as the safest large city in the Western Hemisphere. Countries with relatively low crime are Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay.
The following table lists all the countries in Latin America indicating a valuation of the country's GDP (Gross domestic product) based on purchasing-power-parity (PPP), GDP per capita also adjusted to the (PPP), a measurement of inequality through the Gini index (the higher the index the more unequal the income distribution is), the Human Development Index (HDI), the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), and the Quality-of-life index. GDP and PPP GDP statistics come from the International Monetary Fund with data as of 2006. Gini index, the Human Poverty Index HDI-1, the Human Development Index, and the number of internet users per capita come from the UN Development Program. The number of motor vehicles per capita come from the UNData base on-line. The EPI index comes from the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy and the Quality-of-life index from The Economist Intelligence Unit. Green cells indicate the 1st rank in each category, while yellow indicate the last rank.
+Summary of socio-economic performance indicators for Latin American countries | Country | Gross domestic product>GDP (Purchasing power parity | ! GDP percapita(PPP)(2010 estimates)USD | ! Incomeequality(2000–2010)[[Gini index | Index(2009)Human Poverty Index>HPI-1 % | Develop.(2010)Human Development Index>HDI | Perform.(2010)Environmental Performance Index>EPI | ! Real GDP growth(2010)% | ! Emissionsper capita(2008)ton CO2 | |
632.223 | bgcolor=#ccffcc15,603|| | 48.8 | 3.7 | 0.775 (H) | 61.0 | 7.5 | 4.4 | |||
align="left"> | 47.796| | 4,584 | 57.2 | 11.6 | 0.643 (M) | 44.3 | 4.0 | 1.3 | ||
align="left" | < | bgcolor=#ccffcc | 2,181.677 || | 11,289 | 55.0 | 8.7 | 0.699 (H) | 63.4 | 7.5 | 1.9 |
align="left"> | 257.546| | 14,982 | 52.0 | 3.2 | bgcolor=#ccffcc> 0.783 (H) | 73.3 | 5.0 | 4.4 | ||
align="left" | < | 429.866 | | | 9,445 | 58.5 | 7.6 | 0.689 (H) | 76.8 | 4.7 | 1.4 |
align="left"> | 51.130| | 10,732 | 48.9 | 4.6 | 0.725 (H) | 86.4 | 3.8 | 1.5 | ||
align="left" | < | 111.1 | | | 9,700 | 4.7 | 78.1 | 1.4 | 2.7 | ||
align="left"> | 85.391| | 8,648 | 48.4 | 9.1 | 0.663 (M) | 68.4 | 5.5 | 2.0 | ||
align="left" | < | 113.825 | | | 7,952 | 54.4 | 7.9 | 0.695 (H) | 69.3 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
align="left"> | 43.640| | 7,442 | 46.9 | 14.6 | 0.659 (M) | 69.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
align="left" | < | 69.958 | | | 4,871 | 53.7 | 19.7 | 0.560 (M) | 54.0 | 2.4 | 0.8 |
align="left"> | bgcolor=#ffffcc11.056 || | 1,122 | 59.5 | 31.5 | 0.404 (L) | 39.5 | -8.5 | 0.2 | ||
align="left" | < | 33.537 | | | 4,405 | 55.3 | 13.7 | 0.604 (M) | 49.9 | 2.4 | 1.1 |
align="left"> | 1,549.671| | 14,266 | 51.6 | 5.9 | 0.750 (H) | 67.3 | 5.0 | 3.8 | ||
align="left" | < | 17.269 | | | 2,970 | 52.3 | 17.0 | 0.565 (M) | 57.1 | 3.0 | 0.7 |
align="left"> | 43.725| | 12,398 | 54.9 | 6.7 | 0.755 (H) | 71.4 | 6.2 | 1.9 | ||
align="left" | < | 31.469 | | | 4,915 | 53.2 | 10.5 | 0.640 (M) | 63.5 | 9.0 | 0.6 |
align="left"> | 274.276| | 9,281 | 50.5 | 10.2 | 0.723 (H) | 69.3 | 8.3 | 1.2 | ||
align="left" | < | 48.140 | | | 14,342 | 47.1 | 3.0 | 0.765 (H) | 59.1 | 8.5 | 2.3 |
align="left"> | 346.973| | 11,889 | 43.4 | 6.6 | 0.696 (H) | 62.9 | -1.3 | 5.2 | ||
Total | 6,270.231| | 11,119 | 10.1 | 76.2 | 4 | 2.3 |
Poverty continues to be one of the region's main challenges; according to the ECLAC, Latin America is the most unequal region in the world. Inequality is undermining the region's economic potential and the well-being of its population, since it increases poverty and reduces the impact of economic development on poverty reduction. Inequality in Latin America has deep historical roots that have been difficult to eradicate since the differences between initial endowments and opportunitites among social groups have constrained the poorest's social mobility, thus making poverty to be transmitted from generation to generation, becoming a vicious cycle. High inequality is rooted in exclusionary institutions that have been perpetuated ever since colonial times and that have survived different political and economic regimes. Inequality has been reproduced and transmitted through generations because Latin American political systems allow a differentiated access on the influence that social groups have in the decision making process, and it responds in different ways to the least favored groups that have less political representation and capacity of pressure. Recent economic liberalisation also plays a role as not everyone is equally capable of taking advantage of its benefits. Differences in opportunities and endowments tend to be based on race, ethnicity, rurality and gender. Those differences have a strong impact on the distribution of income, capital and political standing.
According to a study by the World Bank,the richest decile of the population of Latin America earn 48% of the total income, while the poorest 10% of the population earn only 1.6% of the income. In contrast, in developed countries, the top decile receives 29% of the total income, while the bottom decile earns 2.5%. The countries with the highest inequality in the region (as measured with the Gini index in the UN Development Report) in 2007 were Haiti (59.5), Colombia (58.5), Bolivia (58.2), Honduras (55.3), Brazil (55.0), and Panama (54.9), while the countries with the lowest inequality in the region were Venezuela (43.4), Uruguay (46.4) and Costa Rica (47.2).
According to the World Bank the poorest countries in the region were (as of 2008): Haiti, Nicaragua, Bolivia and Honduras. Undernourishment affects to 47% of Haitians, 27% of Nicaraguans, 23% of Bolivians and 22% of Hondurans.
Many countries in Latin America have responded to high levels of poverty by implementing new, or altering old, social assistance programs such as conditional cash transfers. These include Mexico's , Brazil's Bolsa Escola and Bolsa Familia, and Chile's Chile Solidario. In general, these programs provide money to poor families under the condition that those transfers are used as an investment on their children's human capital, such as regular school attendance and basic preventive health care. The purpose of these programs is to address the inter-generational transmission of poverty and to foster social inclusion by explicitly targeting the poor, focusing on children, delivering transfers to women, and changing social accountability relationships between beneficiaries, service providers and governments. These programs have helped to increase school enrollment and attendance and they also have shown improvements in children's health conditions. Most of these transfer schemes are now benefiting around 110 million people in the region and are considered relatively cheap, costing around 0.5% of their GDP.
The major trade blocs (or agreements) in the region are the Union of South American Nations, composed of the integrated Mercosur and Andean Community of Nations (CAN). Minor blocs or trade agreements are the G3 Free Trade Agreement, the Dominican Republic – Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). However, major reconfigurations are taking place along opposing approaches to integration and trade; Venezuela has officially withdrawn from both the CAN and G3 and it has been formally admitted into the Mercosur (pending ratification from the Paraguayan legislature). The president-elect of Ecuador has manifested his intentions of following the same path. This bloc nominally opposes any Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the United States, although Uruguay has manifested its intention otherwise. On the other hand, Mexico is a member of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Chile has already signed an FTA with Canada, and along with Peru are the only two South American nations that have an FTA with the United States. Colombia's government is currently awaiting its ratification by the U.S. Senate.
The following table provides estimated GDP figures for the largest metropolitan areas in Latin America in 2008 and a GDP projection for 2025.
Note: The GDP data are for 2008 while the population data are for 2006. The GDP per capita figures were obtained by dividing these two sets of data, so the results may not accurately reflect the GDP per capita for 2008.
+Performance indicators for international tourism in Latin America | Country | tourist arrivals 2009 Millions of United States dollar>USD | tourism receipts 2009 Millions of United States dollar>USD | ! Receipts per arrival (2)/(1)2009(USD/Tourist) | ! Receipts per capita2009USD | ! Revenues as % of exportsgoods andservices2003 | ! Tourismrevenues as % GDP 2003 | ! % Direct & indirectemploymentin tourism2005 | RankingTourismCompet.Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report>TTCI2011 | Indexvalue Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report | TTCI2011 |
4,329 | 3,916| | 905 | 96 | 7.4 | 1.8 | 9.1 | 60 | 4.20 | |||
align="left"> | 671| | 279 | 416 | 29 | 9.4 | 2.2 | 7.6 | 117 | 3.35 | ||
align="left" | < | 4,802 | | | 5,305 | 1,105 | 27 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 7.0 | 52 | 4.36 |
align="left"> | 2,750| | 1,568 | 570 | 94 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 6.8 | 57 | 4.27 | ||
align="left" | < | | | 1,999 | 44 | 6.6 | 1.4 | 5.9 | 77 | 3.94 | ||
align="left"> | 1,923| | 2,075 | 1,079 | 488 | 17.5 | 8.1 | 13.3 | 44 | 4.43 | ||
align="left" | < | 2,405 | | | 2,080 | 865 | 181 | |||||
align="left"> | 3,992| | 4,065 | 1,018 | 421 | 36.2 | 18.8 | 19.8 | 72 | 3.99 | ||
align="left" | < | 968 | | | 663 | 685 | 45 | 6.3 | 1.5 | 7.4 | 87 | 3.79 |
align="left"> | 1,091| | 319 | 292 | 44 | 12.9 | 3.4 | 6.8 | 96 | 3.68 | ||
align="left" | < | 1,392 | | | 820 | 589 | 61 | 16.0 | 2.6 | 6.0 | 86 | 3.82 |
align="left">* | <| | 12* | 19.4 | 3.2 | 4.7 | ||||||
align="left"> | 870| | 611 | 702 | 78 | 13.5 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 88 | 3.79 | ||
align="left" | < | bgcolor=#ccffcc | 21,454 || | 11,275 | 526 | 101 | 5.7 | 1.6 | 14.2 | 43 | 4.43 |
align="left"> | 932| | 346 | 371 | 59 | 15.5 | 3.7 | 5.6 | 100 | 3.56 | ||
align="left" | < | 1,200 | | | 1,483 | 1,236 | 441 | 10.6 | 6.3 | 12.9 | 56 | 4.30 |
align="left"> | bgcolor=#ffffcc439 || | 112 | 255 | 16 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 6.4 | 123 | 3.26 | ||
align="left" | < | 2,140 | | | 2,046 | 956 | 69 | 9.0 | 1.6 | 7.6 | 69 | 4.04 |
align="left"> | 2,055| | 1,311 | 638 | 375 | 14.2 | 3.6 | 10.7 | 58 | 4.24 | ||
align="left" | | | 788 | 29 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 8.1 | 106 | 3.46 |
Note (1): Haiti, marked with * do not have all statistical data available for 2009 or 2011. Data shown is for reference purposes only (2003 for Haiti).
Latin American culture is a mixture of many cultural expressions worldwide. It is the product of many diverse influences:
From the early twentieth century, the art of Latin America was greatly inspired by the Constructivist Movement. The Constructivist Movement was founded in Russia around 1913 by Vladimir Tatlin. The Movement quickly spread from Russia to Europe and then into Latin America. Joaquín Torres García and Manuel Rendón have been credited with bringing the Constructivist Movement into Latin America from Europe.
An important artistic movement generated in Latin America is muralism represented by Diego Rivera, David Alfaro Siqueiros, José Clemente Orozco and Rufino Tamayo in Mexico and Santiago Martinez Delgado and Pedro Nel Gómez in Colombia. Some of the most impressive Muralista works can be found in Mexico, Colombia, New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Philadelphia.
Painter Frida Kahlo, one of the most famous Mexican artists, painted about her own life and the Mexican culture in a style combining Realism, Symbolism and Surrealism. Kahlo's work commands the highest selling price of all Latin American paintings.
Colombian sculptor and painter Fernando Botero is also widely known by his works which, on first examination, are noted for their exaggerated proportions and the corpulence of the human and animal figures.
Latin American film flourished after sound was introduced in cinema, which added a linguistic barrier to the export of Hollywood film south of the border. The 1950s and 1960s saw a movement towards Third Cinema, led by the Argentine filmmakers Fernando Solanas and Octavio Getino. More recently, a new style of directing and stories filmed has been tagged as "New Latin American Cinema."
Mexican cinema started out in the silent era from 1896–1929 and flourished in the Golden Era of the 1940s. It boasted a huge industry comparable to Hollywood at the time with stars such as María Félix, Dolores del Río, and Pedro Infante. In the 1970s, Mexico was the location for many cult horror and action movies. More recently, films such as Amores Perros (2000) and Y tu mamá también (2001) enjoyed box office and critical acclaim and propelled Alfonso Cuarón and Alejandro González Iñarritu to the front rank of Hollywood directors. Alejandro González Iñárritu directed in (2006) Babel and Alfonso Cuarón directed (Children of Men in (2006), and Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban in (2004)). Guillermo del Toro close friend and also a front rank Hollywood director in Hollywood and Spain, directed Pan's Labyrinth (2006) and produce El Orfanato (2007). Carlos Carrera (The Crime of Father Amaro), and screenwriter Guillermo Arriaga are also some of the most known present-day Mexican film makers. Rudo y Cursi released in December (2008) in Mexico directed by Carlos Cuarón.
Argentine cinema has also been prominenent since the first half of the 20th century and today averages over 60 full-length titles yearly. The industry suffered during the 1976–1983 military dictatorship; but re-emerged to produce the Academy Award winner The Official Story in 1985. A wave of imported U.S. films again damaged the industry in the early 1990s, though it soon recovered, thriving even during the Argentine economic crisis around 2001. Many Argentine movies produced during recent years have been internationally acclaimed, including Nueve reinas (2000), El abrazo partido (2004), El otro (2007) and the 2010 Foreign Language Academy Award winner El secreto de sus ojos.
In Brazil, the Cinema Novo movement created a particular way of making movies with critical and intellectual screenplays, a clearer photography related to the light of the outdoors in a tropical landscape, and a political message. The modern Brazilian film industry has become more profitable inside the country, and some of its productions have received prizes and recognition in Europe and the United States, with movies such as Central do Brasil (1999), Cidade de Deus (2002) and Tropa de Elite (2007).
Cuban cinema has enjoyed much official support since the Cuban revolution and important film-makers include Tomás Gutiérrez Alea.
It is also worth noting that many Latin Americans have achieved significant success within Hollywood, for instance Carmen Miranda (Portuguese-Brazilian), Salma Hayek (Mexican), and Benicio del Toro (Puerto Rican), while Mexican Americans such as Robert Rodriguez have also made their mark.
Pre-Columbian cultures were primarily oral, though the Aztecs and Mayans, for instance, produced elaborate codices. Oral accounts of mythological and religious beliefs were also sometimes recorded after the arrival of European colonizers, as was the case with the Popol Vuh. Moreover, a tradition of oral narrative survives to this day, for instance among the Quechua-speaking population of Peru and the Quiché (K'iche') of Guatemala.
From the very moment of Europe's "discovery" of the continent, early explorers and conquistadores produced written accounts and crónicas of their experience—such as Columbus's letters or Bernal Díaz del Castillo's description of the conquest of Mexico. During the colonial period, written culture was often in the hands of the church, within which context Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz wrote memorable poetry and philosophical essays. Towards the end of the 18th Century and the beginning of the 19th, a distinctive criollo literary tradition emerged, including the first novels such as Lizardi's El Periquillo Sarniento (1816).
The 19th century was a period of "foundational fictions" (in critic Doris Sommer's words), novels in the Romantic or Naturalist traditions that attempted to establish a sense of national identity, and which often focussed on the indigenous question or the dichotomy of "civilization or barbarism" (for which see, say, Domingo Sarmiento's Facundo (1845), Juan León Mera's Cumandá (1879), or Euclides da Cunha's Os Sertões (1902)). The 19th century also witnessed the realist work of Machado de Assis, who made use of surreal devices of metaphor and playful narrative construction, much admired by critic Harold Bloom.
At the turn of the 20th century, modernismo emerged, a poetic movement whose founding text was Nicaraguan poet Rubén Darío's Azul (1888). This was the first Latin American literary movement to influence literary culture outside of the region, and was also the first truly Latin American literature, in that national differences were no longer so much at issue. José Martí, for instance, though a Cuban patriot, also lived in Mexico and the U.S. and wrote for journals in Argentina and elsewhere.
However, what really put Latin American literature on the global map was no doubt the literary boom of the 1960s and 1970s, distinguished by daring and experimental novels (such as Julio Cortázar's Rayuela (1963)) that were frequently published in Spain and quickly translated into English. The Boom's defining novel was Gabriel García Márquez's Cien años de soledad (1967), which led to the association of Latin American literature with magic realism, though other important writers of the period such as the Peruvian Mario Vargas Llosa and Carlos Fuentes do not fit so easily within this framework. Arguably, the Boom's culmination was Augusto Roa Bastos's monumental Yo, el supremo (1974). In the wake of the Boom, influential precursors such as Juan Rulfo, Alejo Carpentier, and above all Jorge Luis Borges were also rediscovered.
Contemporary literature in the region is vibrant and varied, ranging from the best-selling Paulo Coelho and Isabel Allende to the more avant-garde and critically acclaimed work of writers such as Diamela Eltit, Giannina Braschi, Ricardo Piglia, or Roberto Bolaño. There has also been considerable attention paid to the genre of testimonio, texts produced in collaboration with subaltern subjects such as Rigoberta Menchú. Finally, a new breed of chroniclers is represented by the more journalistic Carlos Monsiváis and Pedro Lemebel.
The region boasts six Nobel Prize winners: in addition to the two Chilean poets Gabriela Mistral (1945) and Pablo Neruda (1971), there is also the Colombian writer Gabriel García Márquez (1982), the Guatemalan novelist Miguel Ángel Asturias (1967), the Mexican poet and essayist Octavio Paz (1990), and the Peruvian novelist Mario Vargas Llosa (2010).
Latin America has produced many successful worldwide artists in terms of recorded global music sales. The most successful have been Roberto Carlos (Brazil) who has sold over 100 million records, Carlos Santana (Mexico) with over 75 million, Luis Miguel (Mexico), Shakira (Colombia) and Vicente Fernández (Mexico) with over 50 million records sold worldwide. One of the main characteristics of Latin American music is its diversity, from the lively rhythms of Central America and the Caribbean to the more austere sounds of the Andes and the Southern Cone. Another feature of Latin American music is its original blending of the variety of styles that arrived in The Americas and became influential, from the early Spanish and European Baroque to the different beats of the African rhythms.
Caribbean Hispanic music, such as merengue, bachata, salsa, and more recently reggaeton, from such countries as the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico,Trinidad, Cuba, and Panama has been strongly influenced by African rhythms and melodies. Haiti's compas is a genre of music that draws influence and is thus similar to its Caribbean Hispanic counterparts, with an element of jazz and modern sound as well.
Another well-known Latin American musical genre includes the Argentine and Uruguayan tango, as well as the distinct nuevo tango, a fusion of tango, acoustic and electronic music popularized by bandoneón virtuoso Ástor Piazzolla. Samba, North American jazz, European classical music and choro combined to form bossa nova in Brazil, popularized by guitarrist João Gilberto and pianist Antonio Carlos Jobim.
Other influential Latin American sounds include the Antillean soca and calypso, the Honduras (Garifuna) punta, the Colombian cumbia and vallenato, the Chilean cueca, the Ecuadorian boleros, and rockoleras, the Mexican ranchera, the Nicaraguan palo de Mayo, the Peruvian marinera and tondero, the Uruguayan candombe, the French Antillean zouk (derived from Haitian compas) and the various styles of music from pre-Columbian traditions that are widespread in the Andean region.
The classical composer Heitor Villa-Lobos (1887–1959) worked on the recording of native musical traditions within his homeland of Brazil. The traditions of his homeland heavily influenced his classical works. Also notable is the recent work of the Cuban Leo Brouwer and guitar work of the Venezuelan Antonio Lauro and the Paraguayan Agustín Barrios. Latin America has also produced world-class classical performers such as the Chilean pianist Claudio Arrau, Brazilian pianist Nelson Freire and the Argentine pianist and conductor Daniel Barenboim.
Arguably, the main contribution to music entered through folklore, where the true soul of the Latin American and Caribbean countries is expressed. Musicians such as Yma Súmac, Chabuca Granda, Atahualpa Yupanqui, Violeta Parra, Víctor Jara, Mercedes Sosa, Jorge Negrete, Luiz Gonzaga, Caetano Veloso, Susana Baca, Chavela Vargas, Simon Diaz, Julio Jaramillo, Toto la Momposina as well as musical ensembles such as Inti Illimani and Los Kjarkas are magnificent examples of the heights that this soul can reach.
Latin pop, including many forms of rock, is popular in Latin America today (see Spanish language rock and roll).
More recently, Reggaeton, which blends Jamaican reggae and dancehall with Latin America genres such as bomba and plena, as well as that of hip hop, is becoming more popular, in spite of the controversy surrounding its lyrics, dance steps (Perreo) and music videos. It has become very popular among populations with a "migrant culture" influence – both Latino populations in the U.S., such as southern Florida and New York City, and parts of Latin America where migration to the U.S. is common, such as Puerto Rico, Trinidad, Dominican Republic, Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, and Mexico.
Category:Country classifications Category:Cultural spheres of influence Category:Latin American studies Category:Regions of the Americas
af:Latyns-Amerika ar:أمريكا اللاتينية an:America Latina arc:ܐܡܪܝܩܐ ܠܐܛܝܢܝܬܐ frp:Amèrica latina ast:América Llatina az:Latın Amerikası bm:Latino Amerika bn:লাতিন আমেরিকা zh-min-nan:Latin Bí-chiu be:Лацінская Амерыка be-x-old:Лацінская Амэрыка bs:Latinska Amerika br:Amerika Latin bg:Латинска Америка ca:Amèrica Llatina cv:Латин Америки ceb:Amerikang Latino cs:Latinská Amerika cy:America Ladin da:Latinamerika de:Lateinamerika et:Ladina-Ameerika el:Λατινική Αμερική es:América Latina eo:Latin-Ameriko ext:América Latina eu:Latinoamerika fa:آمریکای لاتین hif:Latin America fo:Latínamerika fr:Amérique latine fy:Latynsk-Amearika ga:Meiriceá Laidineach gd:Aimearaga-Laideannach gl:América Latina gan:拉丁美洲 ko:라틴 아메리카 hr:Latinska Amerika id:Amerika Latin ia:America latin os:Латинаг Америкæ is:Rómanska Ameríka it:America Latina he:אמריקה הלטינית jv:Amérika Latin kn:ಲ್ಯಾಟಿನ್ ಅಮೇರಿಕ ka:ლათინური ამერიკა kk:Латын Америкасы kw:Amerika Latin sw:Amerika ya Kilatini ku:Amerîkaya Latînî lad:Amerika Latina la:America Latina lv:Latīņamerika lt:Lotynų Amerika jbo:la'ortu'a hu:Latin-Amerika mk:Латинска Америка ml:ലാറ്റിൻ അമേരിക്ക mr:लॅटिन अमेरिका arz:امريكا اللاتينيه ms:Amerika Latin mwl:América Latina mn:Латин Америк nah:Latinixachitlān nl:Latijns-Amerika ne:ल्याटिन अमेरिका ja:ラテンアメリカ no:Latin-Amerika nn:Latin-Amerika oc:America Latina pnb:لاطینی امریکہ pl:Ameryka Łacińska pt:América Latina kaa:Latın Amerika ro:America Latină ru:Латинская Америка sco:Laitin Americae stq:Latienamerikoa sq:Amerika Latine scn:Amèrica latina simple:Latin America sk:Latinská Amerika sl:Latinska Amerika sr:Латинска Америка sh:Latinska Amerika fi:Latinalainen Amerikka sv:Latinamerika tl:Latinong Amerika ta:இலத்தீன் அமெரிக்கா tt:Латин Америкасы th:ลาตินอเมริกา tr:Latin Amerika uk:Латинська Америка ur:لاطینی امریکہ vec:Merica latina vi:Mỹ Latinh fiu-vro:Ladina-Ameeriga war:Amerika Latina yo:Amẹ́ríkà Látìnì zh-yue:拉丁美洲 bat-smg:Luotīnu Amerėka zh:拉丁美洲This text is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA License. This text was originally published on Wikipedia and was developed by the Wikipedia community.
The World News (WN) Network, has created this privacy statement in order to demonstrate our firm commitment to user privacy. The following discloses our information gathering and dissemination practices for wn.com, as well as e-mail newsletters.
We do not collect personally identifiable information about you, except when you provide it to us. For example, if you submit an inquiry to us or sign up for our newsletter, you may be asked to provide certain information such as your contact details (name, e-mail address, mailing address, etc.).
When you submit your personally identifiable information through wn.com, you are giving your consent to the collection, use and disclosure of your personal information as set forth in this Privacy Policy. If you would prefer that we not collect any personally identifiable information from you, please do not provide us with any such information. We will not sell or rent your personally identifiable information to third parties without your consent, except as otherwise disclosed in this Privacy Policy.
Except as otherwise disclosed in this Privacy Policy, we will use the information you provide us only for the purpose of responding to your inquiry or in connection with the service for which you provided such information. We may forward your contact information and inquiry to our affiliates and other divisions of our company that we feel can best address your inquiry or provide you with the requested service. We may also use the information you provide in aggregate form for internal business purposes, such as generating statistics and developing marketing plans. We may share or transfer such non-personally identifiable information with or to our affiliates, licensees, agents and partners.
We may retain other companies and individuals to perform functions on our behalf. Such third parties may be provided with access to personally identifiable information needed to perform their functions, but may not use such information for any other purpose.
In addition, we may disclose any information, including personally identifiable information, we deem necessary, in our sole discretion, to comply with any applicable law, regulation, legal proceeding or governmental request.
We do not want you to receive unwanted e-mail from us. We try to make it easy to opt-out of any service you have asked to receive. If you sign-up to our e-mail newsletters we do not sell, exchange or give your e-mail address to a third party.
E-mail addresses are collected via the wn.com web site. Users have to physically opt-in to receive the wn.com newsletter and a verification e-mail is sent. wn.com is clearly and conspicuously named at the point of
collection.If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter and promotional communications, you may opt-out of receiving them by following the instructions included in each newsletter or communication or by e-mailing us at michaelw(at)wn.com
The security of your personal information is important to us. We follow generally accepted industry standards to protect the personal information submitted to us, both during registration and once we receive it. No method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage, is 100 percent secure, however. Therefore, though we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your personal information, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.
If we decide to change our e-mail practices, we will post those changes to this privacy statement, the homepage, and other places we think appropriate so that you are aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it.
If we make material changes to our e-mail practices, we will notify you here, by e-mail, and by means of a notice on our home page.
The advertising banners and other forms of advertising appearing on this Web site are sometimes delivered to you, on our behalf, by a third party. In the course of serving advertisements to this site, the third party may place or recognize a unique cookie on your browser. For more information on cookies, you can visit www.cookiecentral.com.
As we continue to develop our business, we might sell certain aspects of our entities or assets. In such transactions, user information, including personally identifiable information, generally is one of the transferred business assets, and by submitting your personal information on Wn.com you agree that your data may be transferred to such parties in these circumstances.