Questions On Notice

Questions on Notice
Senators may, at any time, address written questions on notice to ministers and other senators. As soon as practicable, questions are forwarded to the appropriate ministers’ offices and to the relevant departments where replies are drafted for consideration by the minister. When a reply is approved by the minister it is delivered to the senator who asked the question and both question and reply are printed in Hansard.

Questions without Notice
Question time in the Senate is scheduled to begin at 2.00 p.m. on each sitting day and usually continues for an hour. The President asks if there are any questions without notice and senators wishing to ask questions rise in their places. After the question has been asked the President calls on the appropriate minister to answer.

Digital Television Transition in Remote Indigenous Communities

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 14th October 2011, 2:29pm

QUESTION NO. 353

Senator Ludlum asked the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, upon notice, on 13 December 2010:

With reference to the Digital Switchover Taskforce and the Satellite Subsidy Scheme which will help households that rely on analog only self help towers to make the transition to the Viewer Access Satellite Television (VAST) and, in particular, to the switchover process in remote Indigenous communities:

(1) Is it true that on or about 1 April 2010 the Minister wrote to remote Indigenous communities which run analog television (TV) self-help transmission facilities and mentioned that one of their options for converting to digital television was to set up a digital self-help TV transmission facility; if so, can a copy of that letter (redacted as necessary to protect privacy) be provided.
(2) What assistance could the department have provided those communities to assess the option of setting up their own digital self-help transmission facility.
(3) What kind of financial assistance and information has been provided to inform homes within remote communities to assess the option of converting to the new VAST satellite.
(4) What type of research has the department done on remote Indigenous communities in relation to the following:
(a) the average number of TV sets and recorder devices in homes which need to be converted to digital;
(b) the extent of insertion of local material into local self help TV transmissions; and
(c) the extent to which only indoor TV set top aerials are needed for current terrestrial TV reception.
(5) (a) Can the Minister confirm that the per-home subsidy available to remote Indigenous homes to convert to the VAST satellite may vary from approximately $550 to $980; and (b) what was the nature of the consultations that took place with remote Indigenous community viewers to determine these figures.

British Atomic Tests in Central Australia in 1950's and 1960's

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 14th October 2011, 2:07pm

Question Number: 1085

Senator Scott Ludlam asked the Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations, in writing, on 29 August 2011:

With reference to the Aboriginal people of central Australia and the north west of Western Australia who were exposed to radioactive fallout or direct radiation exposure from atomic weapons testing by the British Nuclear Test Program of the 1950s and 1960s.

(1) Has the Government ever undertaken a study into the number of Aboriginal people exposed to fallout or direct radiation exposure and the nature of their injuries; if so, can the findings of these studies be provided.
(2) Is the Government aware of how many Aboriginal people exposed to the impacts of these tests are still alive; if so, how many.
(3) Is the Government aware of whether any compensation, in the form of money, legal advice, healthcare or any other form of assistance has ever been offered to Aboriginal people exposed to these tests.
(4) Are there currently any government programs, advice lines, funds, or other forms of assistance in place for Aboriginal victims of atomic weapons testing; if not, what does the Government intend to do to provide redress for those exposed to the harmful impacts of nuclear weapons testing.
(5) Is the Government satisfied that justice has been done to those who were exposed to nuclear weapons tests.

Senator Evans- The answer to the honourable Senator's question is as follows:

1) The responsibility for this matter falls within the resources, energy and tourism portfolio. The Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism has provided the following response:

Question without Notice on the expansion of Olympic Damn uranium mine

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Wednesday 12th October 2011, 4:18pm


Senator LUDLAM (Western Australia) (14:22): My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Senator Conroy. How does the EPBC approval for the expansion of the Olympic Dam uranium mine qualify, as the environment minister suggested yesterday, as the toughest set of environmental conditions ever imposed when the conditions are much less than those imposed on the Ranger mine here in Australia, with the tailings at Ranger having to be buried in a pit and isolated for 10,000 years rather than 10 years, as is the case for the Olympic Dam expansion.


Building Better Regional Cities

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 23rd September 2011, 12:59pm

Question No. 721

Senator Ludlam asked the Minister representing the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, in writing, on 29 June 2011:
Given that the 2011-12 Budget provided $100 million in funding for the new Building Better Regional Cities program for ‘local housing infrastructure projects that will help build ... more affordable homes in high growth regional cities over the next three years' and that 47 regional cities, with populations over 30 000, have been invited to participate in the program.

(1) With reference to the program's website which states ‘funding will only be awarded to cities that provide robust evidence of future jobs growth and can show how many extra affordable homes will be created as a result of the proposed projects':
(a) how will applicants be required to quantify and define the ‘extra affordable homes' they will deliver, if successful in the application process;
(b) in relation to the specific delivery of extra affordable homes, what criteria will be used to assess applications; and
(c) how will ‘extra affordable homes' be measured and reported on as part of this program.

(2) Will any type of formal housing needs analysis be required from the regional cities as part of their application process.

(3) Will all forms of tenure, that is, affordable home ownership, affordable rental and social rental, be included in this scheme.

(4) What are the program targets for housing under each of the following bands identified by the National Affordable Housing Summit:
(a) Band A (rent is kept under 25 per cent of tenants' income);
(b) Band B (rent is 20 per cent less than the market rate for at least 10 years); and
(c) Band C (home purchase programs for low to moderate incomes).

Estimated housing gap for students

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 23rd September 2011, 12:37pm

Question No. 718

Senator Ludlam asked the Minister representing the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, in writing, on 29 June 2011:
In regard to student housing and the National Rental Affordability Scheme (NRAS):

(1) What is the current estimated housing gap for Australian students.

(2) Which agency at the Federal Government level is currently tasked with measuring current housing need for students.

(3) Can a list be provided of all Federal Government programs currently providing funding or other resources (such as policy advice) in the area of student housing.

(4) Can a table be provided listing: the number of full time and part time students by state and territory, the number of student housing dwellings provided on campus by state and territory, and the estimated student housing gap for each state and territory.

(5) To date, how many applications have been submitted to NRAS for student housing since the program began.

Vacant commercial space

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 23rd September 2011, 12:27pm

Question No. 716

Senator Ludlam asked the Minister representing the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, in writing, on 29 June 2011:
With reference to the answer to question on notice no. 75 taken on notice during the 2010-11 additional estimates hearings of the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee, which reported that the department does not keep data on vacant commercial space:
(1) Can the Minister advise which, if any, department currently keeps and collects data on vacant commercial space.
(2) Does the department recognise the potential to transform vacant commercial buildings into affordable rental spaces.
(3) Has the department done any research at all into the kind of incentives needed to make this attractive for property owners.
(4) Will the Minister instruct the National Housing Supply Council to collect data on vacant commercial space; if not, why not.

Senator Conroy: The Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities has provided the following answer to the honourable Senator's question:

1. The department is not aware of any Australian Government agency that collects and maintains data on vacant commercial space.

EFIC financing and uranium project investment

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 23rd September 2011, 12:15pm

Question No. 723

Senator Ludlam asked the Minister representing the Minister for Trade, upon notice, on 29 June 2011:
(1) Has the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation (EFIC) ever invested in any uranium mining or processing projects; if so, can details be provided for each of the loans, including the project/s name, location, amount provided, terms of the loan and the date provided.
(2) Why was finance of $15 million provided to African Underground Mining Services Limited (AUMS) to purchase mining machinery for use in underground mining operations, including the Ahafo gold mine, classified as a Category B project (low to moderate impacts) rather than a Category A (significant impacts) under the EFIC Policy for environmental and social review of transactions.
(3) Has EFIC re-evaluated this finance decision in the wake of reports on the significant environmental and social impacts of the Ahafo gold mine.
(4) Why was finance of $50 million for an ammonium nitrate plant in Indonesia categorised as ‘Category B' environmental impact, which is ‘low to medium' level impact.
(5) Would underground mining operations and ammonium nitrate plants in Australia be classified similarly as low to medium level impact projects.
(6) Will EFIC establish a formal stakeholder forum to enable ongoing structured discussion of transparency and accountability issues in relation to its social and environmental policy.

Housing supply and affordability reform investigation

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 9th September 2011, 1:07pm

Question No. 593

Senator Ludlam: To ask the Minister representing the Treasurer-Given that the department's brief to the incoming Government (the ‘Red Book'), warned of Australia's worsening housing affordability, along with problems of low density living, declining amenity and growing congestion, stating that such issues resulted from fractured and ineffective governance arrangements, and that the department advised the incoming Government to enhance the effectiveness of funding to help Australians in terms of housing, to investigate taxation and planning reforms, and to expedite National Urban Policy Reform, which includes a Housing Supply and Affordability Reform agenda:
(1) How is the department:
(a) investigating taxation and planning reforms;
(b) expediting the National Urban Policy Reform; and
(c) contributing to the Council of Australian Governments' Housing Supply and Affordability Reform agenda.
(2) What resources are devoted specifically to housing affordability, including full time equivalents and specific work units within the department.
(3) Given that sprawl costs an estimated $343 million extra per 1 000 lots, when compared to infill development, how is the department currently:
(a) factoring in the costs of fringe development to the economy; and
(b) working to determine whether land use and the construction industry are being utilised as efficiently as possible.

Inflationary impact of the First Home Owners Scheme (2)

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 9th September 2011, 12:52pm

Senate Standing Committee on Economics
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Treasury Portfolio
Budget Estimates
31 May - 2 June 2011
Question No: BET 268

Senator Ludlam asked:
Senator LUDLAM: If you could. I refer you to an article that ran in the Financial Review on 27 May this
year. It claimed effectively-they have a graph that runs back to 1980 that shows, I think fairly
conclusively-that the first home owners scheme has a direct inflationary impact on the housing market. I
just wonder whether you could go back and see whether Treasury has done any thinking recently-I know
a lot of that is state spending-or whether you have any position papers, statements or research on that?
Dr Parkinson: I am happy to do so.

COAG review of counter-terrorism legislation

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 9th September 2011, 12:22pm

Question No. 911

Senator Ludlam asked the Minister representing the Prime Minister in the Senate on 17 August 2011:

In regard to the Council of Australian Governments' review of counter-terrorism legislation agreed to on 10 February 2006 and supposedly to commence in late 2010:
(1) What are the reasons for the delayed commencement of the review.
(2) When will the review finally commence.
(3) Who will chair the review committee.
(4) Who will be the remaining members of the committee.
(5) When will the submission and hearing process become public.
(6) Will the broad scope of the review, outlined in the 2006 communiqué, be refined to more precise terms of reference.
(7) How will the office of the Independent National Security Legislation
Monitor be engaged in relation to the review.

Senator Evans - The Prime Minister has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's question:

(1) The Commonwealth continues to work towards the commencement of the Review and will finalise the arrangements through the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) as soon as possible. COAG needs to agree to the funding, terms of reference and membership of the Review Committee.

The commencement of the Review was delayed in the first half of 2011 while the Government considered the intersection of the COAG Review with the role of the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor. Certain provisions of the Criminal Code Act 1995 and the Crimes Act 1914 are reviewable by both the COAG Review and the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor.