Strategic and Mindful of Grief

The Martin McGuinness Bus

The bus to nowhere. Image by infomatique via Flickr

The most important learning that the Sinn Fein leadership has taken from the pitifully low polling for Martin McGuiness in the Irish presidential elections is (according to Gerry Adams in an interview for RTE today) that they need to be “strategic” and “mindful” of the grief of families of victims of IRA thuggery.

So there you have it.  The IRA caused the grief.  Adams and McGuinness were IRA leaders.  Now they have to be strategic and mindful of the grief they caused in order to get more votes.

I believe that encapsulates why the winner of the Irish presidential campaign, Michael D Higgins, polled three times more first preference votes than McGuinness. A veritable thrashing.  Well done Mr Higgins.

 

The Incredible Shrinking Northern Ireland Electorate

Polling station sign, London. UK general elect...

Image via Wikipedia

The following article was published in today’s Belfast Telegraph print edition…

In the 2010 General Election just over half of our electorate here in Northern Ireland (57.6%) bothered to vote.  This was the lowest turnout for all of the UK regions and the lowest turnout for a Westminster election since the records for such things began back in 1945.  One could argue that part of the reason for this low turnout was the restoration of devolution.  Voters here, some might argue, are less likely to vote in Westminster elections because the Assembly is responsible for more “bread and butter” issues – to lapse into the jargon of the typical MLA.  However, that’s not the case either…because in the Assembly elections turnout was even worse.  Turnout, in some constituencies, fell to well under 50% – in constituencies such as North Down and East Antrim.

Since the elections nothing has been done to address this problem.  Our politicians are behaving like nothing is wrong – that we still have a proper political discourse and that party politics can go as before.  But they can’t.  In fact there is a vast yawning gulf between party politics and the body politic.

Northern Ireland’s system of participative democracy has been pulled asunder because of a series of perfect storm forces that have been acting upon it.  One force is the underlying desire for a proper secular basis to our politics – outside the seriously tedious debates about “culture” or “identity”.  Another force is the disgust at the grubby grabathon that modern politics has become – with apparatchik political advisors, dodgy deals and shady goings-on.  But the most profound force, resulting in the disengagement of the electorate, is the sheer creepiness of the political class – one that seems incapable of understanding how bizarre local party politics seems to most of us.

The remoteness of the political class becomes more obvious when one looks at how each of the parties behaves.  The DUP chose to entirely ignore the fact that the public perception of it – and its leading dramatis personae – careered to rock bottom because of the patronising tone it adopted in the midst of the various Robinson debacles.  Rather than learning any lessons from the general election result – that saw its party leader lose his Westminster seat to Alliance – the party merely re-grouped and re-secured its East Belfast seat at the Assembly elections (although turnout in Belfast East slumped from 60% in 2007 to 53.6% in 2011).  In short – the DUP appears to have no interest in re-securing the disengaged and disenfranchised.  It merely wants to maximise its vote in the runt of the electorate that bothers to turn out.

Similarly Sinn Fein has chosen to ignore the public disgust at the appointment of Mary McCardle as a special advisor to the “Culture” Minister.  The UUP has chosen to ignore the fact that its public perception – since its appointment of Tom Elliott as Leader – is that it has no real relevance (if it ever had) to any voters East of the Bann.  The SDLP, witters on constantly about regional politics, Ireland this and that, a pan-Irish discourse etc., thereby totally losing us all in its esoteric, navel-gazing rants.

The result of all of this is the incredible, shrinking, Northern Ireland electorate.

In short, it appears that the political system that created vast turnouts in the past is no longer fit for purpose for a present, and future, that requires a different type of politics.  Big turnouts of the past were the stuff of sectarian headcounts.  Indeed, even in the most recent assembly elections the largest turnouts were in rural constituencies where the tribal drums could be beaten the loudest.  Fermanagh & South Tyrone had a turnout of around 69% versus around 46% in leafy, middle class North Down.

Northern Ireland, it would appear, needs a version of the Arab Spring to clear out what has come before.  The entire basis of our party politics is completely wrong for a series of political debates that affects us all.  Like hapless Apprentice contestants, the local political parties set out their stalls in the wrong locations with the wrong merchandise – and hardly anyone bothers to turn up or buy.

A spectrum of lying

Martin McGuinness giving press statement outsi...

Image via Wikipedia

I was at a splendid dinner party on Saturday night.  Two of the guests were from Tipperary.  Shortly after downing a rather splendid Black Muscat the conversation turned to the Irish Presidential election.  I asked the South-of-the-Border dinner guests who they might be voting for.  The response was a tad surprising.  “The last thing we need, at this time, is a new President…the country doesn’t need a President.  It’s all a waste of money.”

Quite.  But, then again, that’s what countries do…waste money on “heads of state”.

But the point they made was that this all seems like a particular waste of money at this particular time in Ireland’s history.

Ireland, before Greece, Portugal and Italy, was a financial laughing stock.  The light was shined on an economy that was, during the Tiger years, as Michael Lewis put it in the New Yorker, feeding upon itself.  Ridiculous property greed, bizarre business ventures, ostentatious consumption.  In short, the Irish rich made ridiculous fools of themselves.

And now they are electing a new President to preside (that is the word to be used in this context) over the shadow of its former self.

The one redeeming aspect of all of this is that the Northern candidates – “Dana” and former IRA leader Martin McGuiness – are hardly shining.  Dana has been shaken by some media tittle tattle about her personal life (the BBC has refused to tell us what it is, but I’m not that interested).  McGuiness has been shaken by the fact that the media, and general populace in the South, don’t seem to adhere to the norms of new-Northern political correctness.  In short they don’t abide to the political rule that the Shinners’ past shouldn’t be rattled in front of them at every opportunity.

Dana and McGuinness, ironically, are suffering from similar problems.  Dana is dogged by her blind adherence to a Catholic faith that one of the most Catholic countries in the world seems to be losing (along with its wealth).  McGuinness is plagued by the fact that his IRA denials and public sympathy for IRA murder victims ring hollow – following years of obfuscation about his involvement.

Ireland may be a shadow of its former self in the post credit-crunch world.  But it can hold its head up high for spotting bullshit when it sees it.

Are ‘Celtic Fringe’ Conservatives About to Declare UDI?

DAVOS/SWITZERLAND, 29JAN10 - David Cameron, Le...

Is David Cameron prepared to see the creation of 'sister parties' in the devolved regions? Image via Wikipedia

The BBC is, today, running an article that suggests that the frontrunner to lead the Scottish Conservatives wants the Scottish Party to distance itself from the Party in London.  In effect, Murdo Fraser wants the Scottish Conservatives to be more, um, Scottish.  There is an inherent logic to this as Westminster is, increasingly, the parliament of England – and more powers are being devolved to the regional parliaments.  Fraser’s ambition, apparently, is to create a Scottish right-of-centre party in Scotland, freed of London-centric coalition baggage.

I gather that similar moves are afoot to create a Northern Ireland centre-right party out of the ruins of the near-dead Ulster Unionist Party and the Conservatives in Northern Ireland.  Rumour has it that several prominent Ulster Unionists are planning to defect to the Conservatives in the next couple of weeks.  And, in an act of meeting them halfway, the Conservative leadership here wants to create a new NI-focused centre-right, and non-sectarian brand – much more distant from the London Party.

To an extent this seems logical.  Some in the UUP genuinely want to distance themselves from the sectarian baggage the party brings to electorate – but don’t want to join a Conservative Party that has no, local, electoral prospects.  Many local Conservatives have also come to the realisation that in the context of devolution there has to be an element of Realpolitik at the core of their single-nation idealism.

If the result is that a genuine non-sectarian, centre-right party is created here, I’m all for it.  I’d just have concerns that the new party – whatever it’s called, will have the necessary leadership charisma to make it an electoral success.

Apologies…

Signing of the Joint Agreement between Scotlan...

Nationalists Together...

For the faithful few who visit this blog so regularly – even when I’m not writing anything – many thanks. I appreciate your loyalty, your patience, and your provocative comments. I must apologise for not having posted for so long. This has been a function of 1) a pretty dead political period 2) a need for me to escape Northern Ireland and drink lots of great wine in the middle of rural France and 3) making a living.

However, because of item 2 I am reinvigorated and have been inspired by some great holiday reading. I’m now ready to re-enter the political blogging foray.

Now I must say that I’ve been somewhat out of the loop and have only been able to watch the BBC’s satellite news output which was 90% dominated by the News International phone tapping issue. Obviously I have been gripped in the hope that some tantalising nuggets may leak out about NI politicians whose phone messages may have been intercepted (especially the phones of those politicians who may have successfully obtained super injunctions). Alas, I have been disappointed. In that respect even the Commons select committee grilling of Murdoch & Son was a damp squib. I live in hope.

On my return from rural France I noticed the number of Scottish flags. Perhaps this has been a well-trodden path by other commentators. But I must say it does seem a tad ironic that our local “loyalists” are so fond of fluttering such a potent symbol of Scottish nationalism so soon after the Scottish Parliament elections when the Scots Nats won such a handsome majority against all the odds.

But it’s a very neat, fluttering, exemplar of how Unionism has become little Ulster Nationalism.  Alex Salmond should be proud.

Government proposals actually increase proportion of unelected, C of E Bishops in Lords

View of the House of Lords Chamber in the Pala...

Image via Wikipedia

The Government’s proposal to retain 12 reserved seats for Church of England Bishops would actually mean an increase proportionately of the presence of Bishops in the House of Lords. Keeping any reserved seats for the Bishops would be an affront to democracy and antithetical to the aims of a fairer and more egalitarian parliament, the British Humanist Association (BHA) has claimed.

The Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg set out the Government’s plans in a statement to the House of Commons from 15.30 on Tuesday 17 May. The Government’s proposals include a significant reduction in membership of the chamber, from nearly 800 at present to 300, and between 80-100% elected and the remaining appointed. At present, 26 Bishops of the Church of England are entitled to sit in the House of Lords as of right; the only such example of clergy holding automatic membership of a legislature in a modern democracy.

At present, Bishops make up 3% of the House of Lords. Under the Government’s proposals that would increase to 4%. Reducing the number of reserved seats for Bishops from 26 to 12 would actually increase their presence proportionately in the chamber.

BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson has commented as follows (and I wholeheartedly agree):

‘The presence of unelected prelates is an anomaly within our system of government, and their retention, even in diminished numbers, would be an indefensible affront to democratic principles. In no other legislative chamber are elected or appointed representatives deemed so insufficiently qualified to deal with matters of belief and morality that they require supplementing by clergy.  Retaining the Lords Spiritual and actually increasing their presence proportionately is completely at odds with the aspiration of a more legitimate and representative second chamber.’

A 2010 ICM poll found that 74% of people think it is ‘wrong’ for Bishops to be given an automatic seat in the Lords, and that 48% said that it was not important for Church of England Bishops to have a role in the Lords. The poll questioned over 1,000 people from different backgrounds.

I take it back…a return to grumpiness

I’ve changed my mind. Nelson McCausland has just been re-elected.  No doubt he’ll be offered a ministerial position despite being Chief of a lost tribe of Israel and being convinced that some big bearded bloke made the world (and Ulster with it) 6,000 years ago – long after the formation of the Giant’s Causeway.

Oh and the turnout is just half the electorate.  Same-old, same-old white-knuckled (mostly elderly) voters electing the same-old, same-old dead-wood (sans a few UUP crazies).

Jeez this place is depressing.

I have returned to grumpiness.

Who will “Do an SNP” in Northern Ireland?

Northern Ireland First Minister Peter Robinson...

Robinson needs to start cleansing his party of flat-earth nutters if he is to "do an SNP" Image via Wikipedia

I’m remarkably up-beat this morning. I have cast aside my normal grumpiness.  While the Northern Ireland election count has been a spectacular mess – the fact that we still have hordes of minor civil servants counting little slips of paper days after the vote is stupefying – the emerging result is good.

Let me explain.

There are a few interesting developments.  Let’s skip over all the constitutional garbage. All the parties are now Little Ulster parties. Even I am beginning to give up on any romantic notions I ever had that Northern Ireland could be ‘integrated’ and treated like, erm, Finchley.

That would be depressing but for a few developments. The first is that the UUP is pretty much dead. The Alliance Party is now a more important party and a vast swathe of middle-class voters is defecting from the UUP to Alliance. Alliance has become the middle class Unionist party (that doesn’t call itself Unionist and whose voter base is not exclusively Protestant). And it’s even beginning to behave a bit more like a sensible, thinking Party. David Forde was the only leader to face-up to the water charges issue and fess-up that he could countenance them (somebody has to pay for the investment needed).  Oh and it had by far the best election broadcast – all CGI – and Naomi Long’s narration was excellent.

Meanwhile, Peter Robinson made clear in the hustings that he wanted the ‘whole community’ to vote DUP. He was at pains to make clear that the constitutional issues were a done deal and that we needed to move on to more bread-and-butter (AKA secular) issues. Well said.  Pity though about all the new-earth creationist nutters in his Party and the fact that the majority of candidates are well-known bigots.

When I showed up at the polling station to cast my own vote (for Alliance by the way, reluctantly, given that Trevor Lunn was my only AP Assembly candidate) I was greeted by the usual horde of DUP leafleters and hangers-on – all of whom, I’m pretty sure, played flutes.

But all things considered things are looking better. The UUP is on the verge of being eradicated from the ballot paper (one less sectarian party to worry about). As I type there is a real prospect that Connal McDevitt may not be elected (one less hectoring know-all from the South to look at on television).  The Alliance Party has more popular support (meaning it will be forced to decide what it stands for in terms of real policy issues rather than merely be ‘nice’).  And the DUP needs to start thinking about how it cleanses itself of the rotten core of sectarianism at its heart in order to “do an SNP” and win an overall majority at Stormont.

Tantalisingly, there is a real prospect that the DUP – if it can, genuinely, cleanse itself of its sectarian baggage, might start eating into more of a cross-community voter base.  There is a prospect that we may see the emergence of two leading parties here in Northern Ireland that will vie for electoral dominance. I predict (and I appreciate that prediction is a mug’s game) that those two parties will be the DUP and Alliance.  Their challenge is to secure as large a swathe of the Sinn Fein vote as possible. Only Alliance and the DUP could achieve what the SNP has achieved in Scotland – because only they are unashamedly Northern Ireland grounded parties.

If either Party has such grand ambitions both need to start focusing on Sinn Fein’s achille’s heel: it’s crazy, confused, ultra-left-wing policies.

Sorry for lack of posts folks…

Rather busy work-wise.  No doubt will get more politically reinvigorated as the elections get a little closer.

Rev Dr Brian Crowe Perved on Office Junior

In the Rectory of the Bizarre Reverend

Image via Wikipedia

I’m not sure what to “perv on an office junior” means – although the Sunday Life, apparently, is telling us today.

The Reverend Doctor Brian Crowe sex scandal in laid bare (literally) in all its detail today.  This must surely be a sub-editor’s paradise story – a holier-than-thou pseudo-intellectual politico and ordained minister exposed as hypocrite and sex fiend.

Northern Ireland’s new normal political landscape is becoming littered with sex scandals.  Fundamental questions need to be asked about how sex and sexuality are removed from our public discourse.  Crowe and his UUP/DUP buddies have stifled debate about such issues as the extension of the Abortion Act to Northern Ireland or the disgraceful levels of teenage pregnancy here (in the context of poor provision of public information about contraception).

Meanwhile, here’s a quote from today’s Sunday Life…

Creepy Crowe, a Stormont special adviser, sent the lobbyist at the centre of the “sex for access” scandal a string of indecent photographs of himself — most of them too crude to publish in a pornographic magazine, never mind a family newspaper.

Our censored photographs are two of the less graphic images which disgraced Dr Crowe sent to the lobbyist who caught him boasting he could deliver political favours for sexual favours.

Next Page »


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 19 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.