Thanks for supporting oceans in the classroom, but we got more work to do!

You guys rock! Thirteen of us managed to bundle up enough cash, just shy of $1,000, to fund 3 project, impacting over 130 students. Many of these supplies will live on to be used by future students down the line so your impact is really immeasurable. Aside from myself, these 12 dedicated ocean lovers deserve a big round of applause for putting the money where it matters most – in local, impoverished schools.
Eric from CT
Lauren from NY
Janice from SC
David from PA
Janet from CA
Jarrett from CA
Elizabeth from IL
Danna from CA
“A science education nerd” from MA
The Donor’s Choose Team
1 Anonymous donor
And our very own Miriam

Thanks to you all, students from Tennessee will learn about ocean acidification, first-graders in Rochester NY will be inspired by their new aquarium, while young learners in Brooklyn NY will learn how important our biggest environment is through their books and toys. One teacher wrote to our readers about what this means for her class:

Thank you so much for your support of this hands-on environmental project I am developing! As an exciting sidenote, my lesson plan and powerpoint for this Ocean Acidification Student Research Project has now been shared with interested educators across the nation via the National Science Teacher Association chatgroups that I actively participate in. As the materials arrive, I will be creating a ‘how to’ guide educators using pictures that I will take as my students and I set up for the project. This project you have so generously funded has already expanded to inspire other science teachers across the nation – before it has even arrived!

Another side note is that I am now pushing my district into allowing me the opportunity to pilot our first ever AP Environmental course offering in 2012. I am currently looking into how to increase the depth of this honors Chemistry project to use it in the upper level Environmental corse. The materials you have made possible will be used for many years to come and in with more students.
With gratitude,
Mrs. P

It’s not too late to make a difference either! Just because our annual drive is over doesn’t mean kids are in any less need. We still have three unfunded projects that we would be honored if you choose to help us fund. There is roughly $1,800 needed to get all three off the ground and OVER 600 STUDENTS WILL BE IMPACTED from just these three projects alone! The4se are schools are in high poverty areas of Detroit, Lousiania and Utah where the educational system has left behind many of its youth. But these teachers are taking the time out of their days to go above and beyond the state-mandated curriculum to provide their students with inspirational learning projects they would never receive otherwise. Let’s not fail them!

Let’s get Louisiana students the materials they need to study their own seas – who knows, maybe inspire a generation that cares enough about the ocean to do everything they can to prevent future oil spill catastrophes in their own backyard. Let’s inspire students from the mountains, many of whom English is a second language, or students from the motor city, many of whom may never see an ocean. Because I’m serious about giving students the best opportunities for learning about the ocean I will send EVERY donor, between now and November 1st, that gives $25 or more one book from my collection of science books. You can pick which one!

Let’s do this. Our impact is high, thousands read us every day and it is getting towards the season of giving and caring, let’s put our collective energy into this next week and get the word out and make this a reality for at least 600 students and teachers.

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

San Diego red tide eaten alive by single-celled predator

GET IN MAH BELLY! These huge predatory dinoflagellates have consumed smaller bioluminescent dinoflagellates.

The red tide that has lit San Diego for several weeks is ending in a microscopic bloodbath. The above photo was taken by Linsey Sala, the manager of the Pelagic Invertebrates Collection at Scripps Institution of Oceanography. She writes:

This image was taken from a collection at the SIO pier this [Friday] morning with a 0.120mm net.  It illustrates a heterotrophic dinoflagellate (Noctiluca, nearly transparent disks) feasting on the autotrophic red tide dinoflagellate (Lingulodinium polyedrum, orange-red cells).

Noctiluca is a dinoflagellate like Lingulodinium, but it can’t photosynthesize. Instead, it makes a living vacuuming up other single-celled organisms. Some Noctiluca are bioluminescent, but the species here in California is not. According to Dr. Peter Franks:

Back in 1995 we had a dense red tide of Lingulodinium polyedrum here, and it collapsed rather suddenly largely through grazing by Noctiluca. Once the Noctiluca had eaten all the L. polyedrum they starved and floated to the surface. There they were swept into lava-colored bands by the underlying internal waves for a few days.

Perhaps we’ll have that to look forward to in the next week or so.

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

PLoS Blogs features DSN

Stacy Konkiel at the EveryONE blog at PLoS has a new post up about different ways scientists are using social media, including yours truly and the DeepSeaNews blog.  In it, Stacy describes me as a Trust Agent.  I had to look that one up, having not heard the term before; it appears to come from a book about using social media to earn trust and build influence.  Anyway, if you’re interested in science and social media, check it out!

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

Donate marine life to a low-income classroom and get a prize!

It’s the second-to-last day of the Donor’s Choose Science Blogger Challenge, and we are just $347 away from buying some awesome sea life for this low-income classroom in Utah. The Donor’s Choose Board of Directors will match every donation from now until 11:59 PM tomorrow, so your impact will be doubled!

There is no way I would be a scientist without the science resources I had access to in my large urban public high school. Also, it’s my birthday and I want to reclaim my lost youth by giving some anemones and jellyfish to these kids.  So to sweeten the pot I will give YOU presents for my birthday! If you donate to the Deep Sea News Donors Choose projects, you will be entered in a drawing to win a prize, sent by yours truly. (People who already donated will also be entered.) Nothing says “I care about science education” like a mug with a research vessel punctured by a giant triton! Donate now!

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

Happy Birthday Miriam!!

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

Friday Penguin KEWTNISSS!1!!

This story at The Today Show’s Animal Tracks is just great, knitters banding together to create adorable pullovers to keep penguins warm after their feathers were cleaned from the devastating recent oil spill ion New Zealand. But nothing is as adorable as the pictures published with the article! Here is sneak peak, go there more.

“[...] In their oil-soaked state, the birds shouldn’t preen themselves because their feathers are contaminated. They also need help staying warm before and after rescue workers do what they can to clean them up.

So Skeinz, a knitting shop in Napier, New Zealand, put out a call for knitters to make little sweaters for penguins in need. And boy, have knitters around the world responded.[...]“

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

Bizarre Love Triangle of the Giant Cuttlefish

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

On common names

Staring into one of the aquarium’s exhibits “I like these new Mastigias jellyfish”, I said, absently.
“Sea jelly”, my colleague corrected (with a certain smugness, I might add).
“I beg your pardon?” I replied.
Sea jelly. They’re sea jellies now.”
“Oh, are they?”
“Yes, like sea stars.”
“I’m sorry?”
“Sea stars.”
“Jellyfish are like sea stars?”
“Sea jellies!”
“Jellyfish are like sea jellies? I thought you said they were the same thing?”
“No, no, no, sea jellies are like sea stars.”
“How do you figure that? One of them is all gooey and tentacular and such, while the other is sort of crunchy and has five arms that don’t much resemble tentacles at all”
*sigh* “NO! jellyfish became sea jellies and starfish became sea stars”
“Ah, I see….I think.”
“Good.”
“And…um…when did …when did this happen?”
“When did what happen?”
“When did invertebrates suddenly begin transmogrifying into other things?”
*quizzically* “Well they didn’t … change … exactly”
“They didn’t? I thought you said jellyfish became sea jellies. I’m pretty sure I remember your saying that. It was a pretty distinctive thing to say.”
“Well I did, but…”
“But what? Did they become sea jellies or not? I mean, I try to stay abreast of major changes in invertebrate systematics, and this sounds like something I should probably have heard about. Last I checked, jellyfish were still Phylum Scyphozoa”
“Sea jellies.”
“I’m sorry?”
“Sea jellies.”
“No, jellyfish are Scyphozoa. I’ve never even heard of sea jellies before just now, I have no idea what phylum they’re in.”
“No, no, they just changed the name, that’s all.”
“What?! Scyphozoa is no more???”
*gritting teeth* “No…jellyfish. They changed the name for jellyfish.”
“What, all of them??”
“YES”
“Wow, how’d I miss that?”
*ignoring me* “They changed the common name ‘jellyfish’ to ‘sea jelly’”
“Who did?”
“Who did what?”
“Who changed jellyfish to sea jelly?”
“Oh, well….um…I don’t know exactly. I…um…I just heard that somewhere.”
“You heard it?”
“Yes.”
“You heard it.”
“Mmhmm.”
“I see.”
“Yep.”
“And were these the same people who changed starfish to sea stars?”
“Er… I guess so, I don’t really know.”
“Seems important don’t you think?”
“What does?”
“Changing the commonly-accepted name for large groups of invertebrates. Seems like something someone in some sort of position of authority ought to be doing.”
“I guess.”
“And are they?”
“Are they what?”
“Are they in a position of authority?”
“Well, I don’t rightly know. I just…I read somewhere…”
“Why?”
“Why was I reading? What an odd question!”
“No, why did they change the name?”
“You mean jellyfish?”
“Yes”
“I think it was to reduce confusion”
*pause*
“ORLY?”
“I beg your pardon?”
“Nevermind. So you’re saying they changed jellyfish to sea jelly to reduce confusion?”
“Yes.”
“Confusion with what?”
“Fish.”
“Huh?”
“Fish.”
“People were confusing fish and jellyfish?”
“Yes. I mean … I guess. I don’t really know.”
“You don’t know the difference between a fish and jellyfish?”
*scowling* “Of course I know the difference!”
“Well, why change the name then? Was there a sudden epidemic crisis of taxonomic confidence among today’s youth?”
“A what?”
“Forget it. Look, we can’t have mysterious groups of anonymous people just going around changing the names of large groups of cnidarians just because T-Ball Nation can’t tell the difference between bilateral and radial symmetry”
“T-what?”
“T-Ball Nation. You know, Generation Text.”
“You’re a strange person, you know that?”
“Yeah, well at least I can tell the difference between a fish and a jellyfish”
“I KNOW THE BLOODY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A FISH AND A JELLYFISH!!!”
“Good for you, but you really should try to calm down a bit, maybe…”
“I’m perfectly calm.”
“…consider decaf or, y’know, meditation.”
“I. Am. Perfectly. Calm.”
“Well OK there sport. Anyway, let’s go on to the next tank. I heard they’ve got some lovely sea cuttles…”

Jelly Fish

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

How scientists found debris from the Japanese tsunami 700 miles off Midway

About six months ago, University of Hawaii scientists Nikolai Maximenko and Jan Hafner mapped the likely route of debris dumped into the ocean by the March 11 Japanese tsunami. Just last week, a Russian sail training vessel used their maps to find the debris field. Since the North Pacific is really, really big – over three times the size of the United States – how did they do it?

T

The tsunami debris map above is a mathematical model, but it has a basis in the real world – it’s based on the paths taken by thousands of freely drifting buoys. The Global Drifter Program (GDP) currently tracks 1,037 of these buoys throughout the world’s oceans, and explains their design like this:

The modern drifter is a high-tech version of the “message in a bottle”. It consists of a surface buoy and a subsurface drogue (sea anchor), attached by a long, thin tether. The buoy measures temperature and other properties, and has a transmitter to send the data to passing satellites. The drogue dominates the total area of the instrument and is centered at a depth of 15 meters beneath the sea surface.

The drifters are easily deployed off any ship – you just toss them overboard (I’ve done this! It’s fun!) – which makes them a relatively inexpensive way of getting a lot of information about how the ocean’s surface moves and changes. All this information can be incorporated into mathematical models of how drifting objects move through the ocean, making these models more accurate. Drs. Maximenko and Hafner used this data to create the Surface CUrrents from a Diagnostic model (SCUD), which incorporates real-time satellite data and drifter tracks to predict how tsunami debris will move across the Pacific.

Man deploying a drifter.

However, a drifting buoy with a 45-foot sea anchor is going to move pretty differently than tsunami debris that contains everything from cars to boats to the contents of people’s houses. That’s why it’s very important to test these models in the real world. Fortunately, the STS Pallada, a Russian sail training vessel going from Hawaii to Vladivostok, had Maximenko & Hafner’s debris maps and kept a eye out for tsunami debris. (The nonprofit organizations Algalita & 5 Gyres are also mounting an expedition to find the tsunami debris, scheduled to depart in May 2012).

STS Pallada hoisting up the small boat originally from Fukushima Prefecture, Japan.

Here’s what the crew of the Pallada found. From the UH press release (PDF):

“Yesterday, i.e. on September 22, in position 31 042,21 N and 174 045,21 E [about 700 miles northwest of Midway], we picked up on board the Japanese fishing boat. Radioactivity level – normal, we’ve measured it with the Geiger counter,” writes Natalia Borodina, Information and Education Mate of the Pallada. “At the approaches to the mentioned position (maybe 10 – 15 minutes before) we also sighted a TV set, fridge and a couple of other home appliances.”

Later, on September 27: “We keep sighting every day things like wooden boards, plastic bottles, buoys from fishing nets (small and big ones), an object resembling wash basin, drums, boots, other wastes. All these objects are floating by the ship.”

From the UH press release: "The map shows the stretch of Pallada's route where debris was sighted between September 21 and 28, 2011. The red rhombus marks the location where the Japanese boat was found and the red circle denotes maximum debris density experienced. Purple color shows the distribution of the tsunami debris in the SCUD model on September 25."

The debris is exactly where Maximenko & Hafner’s SCUD model predicted it would be! This means that we have a reasonably accurate method for predicting where the debris will go, and when it will make landfall. People on the US West Coast states are very concerned – here’s a recent article from Oregon Beach Connection worrying about the debris’ arrival in 2013 – but we are actually fairly well protected by the southbound California Current. It’s the the Hawaiian Islands that are going to bear the brunt of the impact. Hawaii gets nailed twice – first on the eastward journey, then again once the debris gets swept south in California Current (off the US West Coast), into the North Equatorial Current underneath the trade winds, and west to Hawaii. This is terrible for Hawaii’s fragile ecosystem, which already has a huge marine debris problem, but at least we know it’s coming and can prepare.

If you are concerned about marine debris and want to get involved, the most important thing is to get baseline data now, before the tsunami debris arrives. The easiest way to do this is to download the Marine Debris Tracker app (for Android and iPhone) and start recording what you find and where you find it. If you want your data to be scientific, the NOAA Marine Debris program has a Shoreline Survey Field Guide that they’ll send you – just email MDsightings@gmail.com.

The accuracy of Maximenko & Hafner’s SCUD model is a product of 50 years of government investment in basic science. All aspects of the model required huge investment in seemingly obscure measurements, such as watching buoys drift around in the ocean and developing satellites that measure wind and sea surface height. (Incidentally, the US satellite that measured wind went offline in 2009 and has not been replaced.)  Can’t you imagine a politician making fun of scientists using “high-tech messages in a bottle”? But the SCUD model is just another reason that it’s never a waste of resources to understand how the world works. Because we’ve made these investments, we have the information we need to reduce some of the consequences of the tsunami’s unpredictable destruction.

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare

New Oil Skimmer Design Wins X-Prize

Story at NPR:

A breakthrough in oil cleanup technology allows crews to skim spilled oil off the water’s surface at a much faster rate. The new device wasn’t developed by Exxon, BP or any of the major oil companies — it’s the work of Elastec/American Marine, based in Illinois. And the design won the company a rich award from the X Prize Foundation.

Oil is attracted to plastic. And water is not. That, in essence, is the basis of Elastec’s new skimmer.

It’s huge, about the size of a large U-Haul truck. And it looks something like a giant abacus. It has 64 grooved plastic discs, arranged in rows, with a scraper along the top.

“That’s the elegance of this machine. It sounds like it’s just so basic, but it picks the oil off, puts it in a trough and we pump it away, and that’s all there is to it,” says Team Elastec project manager Don Johnson. “And it does it at a nearly 90 percent efficiency rate.” (click link above for the full scoop and audio)

DeliciousDiggFarkFacebookFriendFeedRedditSlashdotStumbleUponBeboShare