End the Fed

18 Responses




(If you read the book, please post your review below).

In his latest book End the Fed, Ron Paul draws on American history, economics, and fascinating stories from his own long political life to argue that the Fed is both corrupt and unconstitutional. It is inflating currency today at nearly a Weimar or Zimbabwe level, a practice that threatens to put us into an inflationary depression where $100 bills are worthless. What most people don’t realize is that the Fed — created by the Morgans and Rockefellers at a private club off the coast of Georgia — is actually working against their own personal interests. Congressman Paul’s urgent appeal to all citizens and officials tells us where we went wrong and what we need to do fix America’s economic policy for future generations.

(If you read the book, please post your review below).

Share/Bookmark
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

It is true to say that the FED can create money out of nothing and inflate the money supply but it is not the whole story.

With 97% of the money supply being created by Private Banks, the FED is not the only private company to inject money into the money stock.
http://www.bendyson.com/statistics/

What isn't created is enough money to pay back the Interest. This is where inflation comes from - even without Quatitative Easing.

Even if there wasn't a Financial Crisis, the money supply would still need to increase in order to pay the interest to the Banks. Our money supply is dependent on people borrowing money from Banks because our Government's do not create enough money as they leave this task to Private Banks and us - the tax payers; to borrow that money into existence.

The Bank of England was created by Banks, for Banks. It was never intended to provide stability for the masses, it was created to provided a safety net for Banks due to the Fractional Reserve Banking system, which allows Banks to lend far more than they have in deposit by savers. Therefore - a run on the Bank would destroy a Bank if they didn't have a Central Bank; like the FED or BoE.

Politicians and Royalty were complicit in this scheme as they could wage Wars and tax people through inflation - to pay for them, as Ron Paul says in his book.
The Royal Family even bought shares in the Bank of England - they expected a return on their investment. So where was that profit being generated?

Back to my point above concerning the money required to pay the interest payments as only the Principal of a loan is created and not the interest. The Bank of England has set a target inflation rate of 2% - not less than or greater than - but 2%. The Governor has to write a letter to the Chancellor if inflation is below target.

"The Bank aims to keep the annual rate of inflation at 2% – the inflation target set by the Government. Some prices will rise by more, others by less. But, on average, the aim is that prices across the economy RISE by 2% a year."

Even the Bank of England realises that without any inflation, there would not be enough money to pay the interest to the Banks. President Andrew Jackson fought his campaign on the slogan "Me and NO Bank". In 1828, Americans understood how Central Banks allowed foriegn intervention into their affairs.
This era was known as Jacksonian democracy, as Central Banks remove democracy and create a form of communism.

It is no coincidence that the IRS was created at the same time as the FED. Both institutions are involved in extracting money from the public.

Looking at a recent Television debate - between Ron Paul and other candidates, the other candidates appeared to be highly polished and smartly presented, but repeated the same old rhetoric, while Dr Paul was the only one passionate about the true causes of our current financial mess and further involvement in another War which has more to do with Libya's Gold reserve's and deisre to create it's own regional currency, thereby illiminating the need for the US Dollar in Oil purchases. Follow the money to get to the truth.

"The Real Reason for NATO Attacking Libya (GOLD CURRENCY)"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5to_-tXerCw

I'm seventeen and will be able to state my opinion in the next presidential election. I'm homeschooled and last year I needed a government course for highschool. My dad (who has been a fan of Ron Paul for well over 5, 6 years now) gave me a book called "End The Fed" by Dr. Ron Paul. I thouraghly enjoyed it. Not only is it easy to read and is in terms that the average person can understand, but it made a ton of sense (even to a junior in highschool). I love how Dr. Paul takes instances in history and applies them to this day and age. I'm a huge fan of history and when a person looks to the past to understand the future it is refreshing, because people who know their history are disappearing fast. My father and I have debated and discussed this book many times and it has spurned many good ideas and thoughts. I'm about to read it again and can't wait to see what I'll learn from this second reading. I recommend it to all my friends!

I asked for the Book "End The FED" as a Christmas Present last year.

G Edward Griffin's "The Creature from Jekyll Island" is a similar book which also goes into how economics affects foriegn policy and our political system and also makes Historical References to how Central Banks have played key roles in War promotion.

Both these Books are stunning realisations of how corrupt and deceptive our political systems are. As a British Citizen, I can see no difference between the "Federal Reserve System" and the "Bank of England".

As a long term saver - I have been attempting to get onto the property ladder for literally decades but have been unable to despite having a First Class Honours Degree in Electrical Engineering and a higher than average salary. I have suspected that the Government were delibrately keeping house prices higher inorder to force people to work harder. I didn't really grasp how much the Banks benefit from High House Prices and that it is their interests to maintain high house prices by allowing large mortgage loans into the Housing Market with the knowledge that if those debts go bad, we the tax payers pay the the price.

I no longer spend any time criticising one political Party from another. It's quite clear to me now that they adopt the same bankrupting policies as each other.

Examples:
1. Tony Blair supports No Fly Zone in Iraq Leading to invasion 2003
David Cameron supports No Fly Zone in Libya. 2011

2. Gordon Brown announces "Shared Equity" scheme to help first time buyers by supplying Public Money into already inflated Housing Market 2005
George Osborne announces "FirtBuy" scheme to help first time buyers by supplying public money into a still over inflated Housing Market March 2011.

After visiting a building society leaflet on an Index Linked Savings Bond I noticed that they provided a description on what caused inflation:

"Inflation, which is the result of rising fuel prices, higher food costs and increases in things like VAT, means that you might not be able to buy as much with your money in the future as you can today"
- I thought increasing prices were a sympton of increasing money supply and not a cause. It's true that VAT and Peak Oil and shortages in food do increase prices but increasing money supply is the main reason.

There's talk that the main reason why Ron Paul will not be elected as President is because the Republican Party will not nominate him despite and increasing amount of real American support in the general population. The Republican Party could stand in the way of Ron Paul's election hopes.

Ron Paul's book "End the Fed" is an excellent read and I am currently in the process of a second read.

CONRAD EXCELLENT POINTS AND PERSPECTIVES!

I too have putting the dots together since after reading The Creature From Jekyll Island and listening to Griffins lectures on the way International Banking Cartels have been ruling over the Nations. How the idea of choices in political parties is a sham and with the citizens of those Nations having to accept the policies and decisions of their leaders who are in a real sense hand picked and effects of their decisions.

What is the term that Griffin used in his book when ever you seek to find the truth Always Follow the Money Trail.

"he who holds the purse strings of a nation controls its destiny" I think it was William Patterson who made that statement when he was discussing the Bank of England

Again great points. nice the way you put the pieces of the puzzle together!

End The Fed by Ron Paul is one of the best books on the subject of our central banks abuse. When you can create a Trillion dollars with a bookeeping entry that is power the president of the US can only dream about. The best thing this book has done is bring me in touch with the Mises Institure. Go on line and look at their videos of Ron Paul and many others... here is the holy grail of the gold standard and no central bank... www.mises.org... Sid Sutherland

oh,guy,it'i realy great!

Where can I buy this book OTHER THAN ON AMAZON?
(I am one of the millions boycotting Amazon after it ditched WikiLeaks)

It seems I cannot buy direct from RP?

www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/ron-paul-what-wikileaks/

The book was a fantastic source for facts on Ron's interaction with the Fed over the years. Ron Paul is a hero. I thought the book was great.

That said, it was about as boring as anything I've ever read. Had it not been for my deep interest in this topic, I wouldn't have gotten through it.

I do not recommend this book to the "newbie" who is just coming to realize what is going on. They should start with the video "Money as Debt II", then move onto the Congressman's book.

Awesome book. Great read. I wish everyone in the country would read it. Hell, even reading just the first chapter would be amazing.

This was the most accessible, easy to read explanation of the evils of monopolistic centralized banking based on fiat currency I have ever read.

The book "End The Fed" is a great read. I recommend it. However, I do not agree with everything Ron Paul says in it. His ideas are overly idealistic, and the expectations he paints for going back to gold standard are naive. I like his criticism of The Fed, but I wish he would confine his suggestions about change to constructive corrections, not hyperbole leading to complete destruction of the system. We need a middle ground between his proposals and the position of the current Fed chairman.

There is a place for government in the regulation of markets, money, and banking institutions. Left to themselves corporate America, whether it is the financial industry or any other branch of the private economy will lead to further disproportionate distribution of wealth to the ownership demographic i.e. high income brackets, and away from the middle/lower economic classes. Look at the data from 1970 forward on income growth by income percentile. The top 10% have gained about 10 times more than the bottom 10%. It has nothing to do with inflation, the data are in nominal dollars. If inflation were considered the spread would be many, many, times worse.

Ron's beef with the Fed regarding inflation is not the entire answer.

Joseph,

I agree with your comment that inflation is not the whole story. Ownership, as you suggest, plays a bigger role in the inequity of wealth.

To understand wealth, how it is achieved and how it is maintained, one must understand the concept of ownership.

I will introduce an overly simplified but cogent example.

Anyone that plays the board game "Monopoly," and plays it well, realizes it to be a game of ownership based on two simple tenets: luck and coercion.

There is an absolute strategy that guarantees success in Monopoly which is to fully develop the greatest number of "high rent" properties. How one is able to accomplish this is a question of the two aforementioned variables. It is luck that one may land on and lay claim to properties they need, but one is a "real player" if they are able to coerce a lesser player to relinquish his property to in spite of it assuring his eventual loss of the game. In Monopoly, as in life, a real player uses all manner of externalized (outside the game "system") persuasion to acquire property within the game, such as eternal damnation, brutalization, or candy.

If one wants to get real about ownership, American citizens should realize they are entitled to a lot more "rights" than simply life, liberty and Obama-style health care. They are entitled to an equity share in all raw, natural resources that are used in the formation of capital. An equity share which should be traded on the "free markets" just as the unlawfully seized and coerced forms of property and capital stolen and inflated by fiat money, unlawful taxation and usury are presently exchanged and hoarded.

My country of origin is England and the same awful nonsense goes on here. Here it is the 'Bank of England' (private) that prints, inflates then deflates our money by printing more (or less) of it at will, or of the will of the polititians it manipulates. When I finally found out this from people like Ron Paul, (End the Fed), Alex Jones (Info wars/ Prison planet.com & Endgame/ Obama Deception) and Daniel Estulin - who has followed Bilderberg group like a bad smell! (Shadow Masters) - it was like I awoke from a deep DEEP sleep. Thank God we still have a free press to find the truth about the Rockerfellers and the Rothschilds! Amen?! ALL that matters is a spirit that is right with God. Anyone can take your life but they CAN'T have your spirit. I thank God for Ron Paul. I also pray for these old dying men from the Fed (Greenspan, Rockerseller, etc.)it is so sad because they are so tied up in money. I actually pray for Rockerfeller, etc to repent and do good with the money that is in their hands. xx

I just finished this book. It make so much sense. It really brings to light the high amounts of corruption and control the central bankers have over America and the world. This book brings common sense to the world of economics. People are going to do what is easier. Water and electricity both take the paths of least resistance. People are no different and the FED has created cheap credit so people can spend spend spend. Obviously if that were real captital in the bank then we could spend but it is not capital it is credit. Buy now Pay later is finally caught up with all of us. Later has become now.

This book talks quite a bit about how the dollar is losing value and Ron Paul makes the case that wars would be a lot shorter or non existant if we did not have central banks. You see, the central banks are inflating the dollar that is how this country has been able to pay for the wars we are in. There is no direct tax on the american people we can see, it is the loss of buying power of our dollar that is the tax. This is why things are more expensive.

Great book a definite read.

Nathan Schuler

Jack, you are right - shame on us Americans and especially us pauliticians (fans of Ron Paul), who have not yet read his latest book. After reading both Jack's and Tim's comments I promptly ordered "End the Fed." I shall be looking forward to it in the mail in the next week or so.

This book is amazing and will open your eyes to many issues you may not be aware of. If you are a U.S. citizen, I highly recommend this book.

Why are there not more comments about this book? Has anybody read it? How is it? I just watched a video about the 2008 Ron Paul campaign, I thought this place would be a hive of activity?

Tom O"Brien has a daily financial radio show on everyday and would like to interview Ron.

Thanks