Showing posts with label Committee to Stop FBI Repression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Committee to Stop FBI Repression. Show all posts

Saturday, February 04, 2012

U.S. Attorney’s Office Confirms Investigation Is Ongoing into Antiwar Activists


The Northern Illinois Assistant U.S. Attorney Barry Jonas stated that the “investigation is continuing” into the case of the anti-war and international solidarity activists hit with FBI raids and grand jury repression. Barry Jonas is known for his leading role in prosecuting the leaders of the Holy Land Foundation while he was trial attorney for the Department of Justice Counter-terrorism Section.

This confirms what the U.S. Attorney’s office related some months ago—they are preparing multiple indictments of multiple activists. The FBI raided seven homes and the government subpoenaed 23 international solidarity activists to a Chicago grand jury over a year ago. The anti-war activists refused to appear at the secretive grand jury and launched a campaign against political repression. The U.S. government is threatening to imprison anti-war activists on the grounds of “material support for terrorism.”

The confirmation of the ongoing investigation came during a January 24, 2012 phone call between Assistant U.S. Attorney Barry Jonas and attorney Bruch Nestor, who represents some of the political activists.

Nestor initially contacted Minneapolis Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Winter to view some of the sealed documents in the case. The grand jury proceedings against the anti-war activists are secret. The vast majority of documents relating to their case are under seal, meaning the targeted activists or their attorneys cannot view them. Assistant U.S. Attorney Winter helped to oversee the Sept. 24, 2010 raids and in recent months represented the government on the issue of returning property seized in the raids. Winter told Nestor to contact Chicago Assistant U.S. Attorney Barry Jonas.

Jonas told Nestor the documents would remain secret "pending completion of the investigation."

Barry Jonas is responsible for railroading the Holy Land leaders. Jonas views solidarity with Palestine as a crime deserving long-term imprisonment. He is willing to pull every dirty trick available to him to obtain convictions. The Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development was once the largest Muslim charity in the U.S. Its efforts were geared towards providing humanitarian aid to help the people of Palestine and other countries. In 2001 its offices were raided. Three years later, five people associated with the charity were indicted. The first trial ended with a hung jury. The second trial ended with convictions. The five defendants received sentences that range from 15 to 65 years in prison.

The trial included secret witnesses - the defense never got to find out who the witnesses were - the use of hearsay evidence, and the introduction of evidence that had nothing to do with the defendants in the case, such as showing a video from Palestine of protesters burning an American flag, as a means to prejudice the jury.

As lead prosecutor, Barry Jonas played a key role in all this. He is now working under Chicago U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, who runs the federal grand jury attacking anti-war and international solidarity activists.

The Committee to Stop FBI Repression urges all supporters of peace with justice to sign the pledge to take action (http://www.stopfbi.net/get-involved/pledge-of-resistance) in the event that international solidarity activists are indicted. In a closely related case, the FBI directed the LA Sheriff to raid the home of veteran Chicano leader Carlos Montes. Carlos Montes is now facing trial and imprisonment on six felony charges relating back to a student protest that happened 42 years ago.

Monday, December 26, 2011

One year after FBI subpoena, civil liberties protections in US frighteningly eroded even further

A year ago yesterday, I got the dreaded house call from the FBI. I was at home working when two agents rang my buzzer and asked to speak with me.

I had been expecting such a visit; on 24 September 2010 the FBI raided the homes of prominent anti-war and international solidarity organizers I have worked with over the years in Chicago, as well as the homes of activists in the Twin Cities and the office of the Anti War Committee there. In the weeks that followed, more Palestine solidarity organizers and Palestinian Americans in Chicago were delivered subpoenas to appear before a federal grand jury in Chicago as part of an investigation into violations of the laws banning material support for foreign terrorist organizations.

I declined to speak with the two agents who visited me; they then gave me a subpoena to appear before a federal grand jury on 25 January 2011. I spent last Christmas and New Year convinced that I would soon be in federal prison for civil contempt of court. Even though it meant we risked being jailed, all 23 of us who have been subpoenaed as part of this grand jury fishing expedition have refused to testify. We have asserted that our first amendment rights guaranteed by the US Constitution, protecting free speech and freedom of association, are being trampled on.

A first amendment issue

The grand jury — essentially a secret court in which you’re not allowed to have a lawyer, and there is not even a judge presiding over the proceedings — has been long abused as a tool of inquisition into domestic political movements. Indeed, no specific crime has been identified related to our case.

The FBI’s operations manual for the September raids, discovered last April to have been accidentally left amongst a raided activist’s files, make it clear that they wanted to question activists about associational information — who activists know and work with in the US, Colombia and Palestine, and how activists organize and what they believe. They wanted people to name everyone they know who has ever traveled to the Middle East or South America.

It is also obvious the FBI put up the LA County Sheriff to raid the home of veteran Chicano liberation activist Carlos Montes last May; he faces trumped-up technical firearms violation charges and serious prison time. The FBI was on hand during the raid to question Montes about his political associations (an organizer of the 2008 Republican National Convention protests, he was named in the search warrant used to raid the Anti War Committee office) and took material from his home related to his long history of political organizing. They even took a kuffiyeh — the traditional checkered Palestinian scarf — only one example of many demonstrating how federal agents so arbitrarily confiscated property from activists’ homes.

And while the threat of indictments looms, I am not spending Christmas and new year’s in federal prison for civil contempt of court. This is, I believe, thanks to the vocal protest that countless people around the US and around the world have made in support of the 24 of us and in support of civil liberties. This is a huge victory. But at the same time, civil liberties and constitutional protections have further eroded even in the last year. More protest must be shown before the situation gets even worse.

A bad time for civil liberties

Even The New York Times has excoriated the Obama administration over its civil liberties record after its justice department went even further than Bush’s to expand the FBI’s powers to investigate US citizens, “even when there is no firm basis for suspecting any wrongdoing.” In an editorial entitled “Backward at the FBI,” the Times takes the FBI’s new operations manual to task, as revised guidelines “will give agents significant new powers to search law enforcement and private databases, go through household trash or deploy surveillance teams, with even fewer checks against abuse.”

The Times adds:

They also expand the special rules covering “undisclosed participation” in an organization by an FBI agent or informant. The current rules are not public, and, as things stand they still won’t be. But we do know the changes allow an agent or informant to surreptitiously attend up to five meetings of a group before the rules for undisclosed participation — whatever they are — kick in.

[…]

The FBI’s recent history includes the abuse of national security letters to gather information about law-abiding citizens without court orders, and inappropriate investigations of antiwar and environmental activists. That is hardly a foundation for further loosening the rules for conducting investigations or watering down internal record-keeping and oversight.

After that editorial was published in June, things only got worse. The United States government sanctioned and carried out the assassination of one of its citizens on foreign soil despite the fact that he posed no immediate danger to public safety. Vince Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, stated after the Anwar al-Awlaki was killed by a US drone in Yemen:

The targeted assassination program that started under President Bush and expanded under the Obama Administration essentially grants the executive the power to kill any US citizen deemed a threat, without any judicial oversight, or any of the rights afforded by our Constitution. If we allow such gross overreaches of power to continue, we are setting the stage for increasing erosions of civil liberties and the rule of law.

Other stains on civil liberties this year included the persecution and conviction of the the Irvine 11 — a group of students (all of the Muslim, all of them young men) who were subjected to a criminal trial for briefly and nonviolently disrupting the speech of Israeli ambassador Michael Oren.

Tens of chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine said it best in a statement following the convictions:

We unequivocally condemn these charges, which unfairly single out and criminalize Muslim students who chose to exercise their First Amendment right to speak out against Israel’s human rights abuses. Had the speaker not been Israeli, had the issue not been Palestine, had the students not been Muslim, these charges never would have been pursued. Rather, these charges reflect a climate of Islamophobia and an irrational exceptionalism for Israel when it comes to free speech. The charges chill the free exchange of ideas and students’ right to protest at universities nationwide.

Guantanamo comes to the US

But perhaps the scariest development in the war on civil liberties this year is the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2012, which if enacted would allow the indefinite detention of US citizens without trial, not unlike Israel’s use of administrative detention. Indeed, as Human Rights Watch summarizes, “In addition to codifying indefinite detention without charge in US law, the bill would require that the military, rather than federal, state, or local law enforcement, handle certain terrorism cases.”

RT: #NDAA codifies into law military’s power to indefinitely detain any American citizen w/o charges, evidence, or trial. Obama must veto.
Dec 02 via webFavoriteRetweetReply

The bill has been already passed by Congress, and now Obama has dropped his threats to veto the bill. Constitutional law attorney Glenn Greenwald described the potential ramifications of the legislation on Democracy Now!:

it will be the first time that the United States Congress has codified the power of indefinite detention into the law since the McCarthy era of the 1950s. The 1950 Congress passed a bill saying that communists and subversives could be imprisoned without a trial, without full due process, based on the allegation that they presented a national threat, an emergency, a threat to the national security of the United States. President Truman, knowing that the bill would—the veto would be overridden, nonetheless vetoed it and said that it made a mockery of the Bill of Rights. That law was repealed in 1971 with the Non-Detention Act, that said you cannot hold people in prison without charging them with a crime. The war on terror has eroded that principle, under both the Bush and Obama administrations, but Congress is now, with the Democrats in control of the Senate and a Democratic president, is about to enact into law the first bill that will say that the military and the United States government do have this power. It’s muddled whether it applies to US citizens on U.S. soil, but it’s clearly indefinite detention, and there’s a very strong case to make that it includes US citizens, as well, which, as we know, the Obama administration already claims anyway, and that’s what makes it so dangerous.

Not only is the Obama administration not closing Guantanamo, but it is paving the way for more Guantanamo-style indefinite detention of US citizens in a military court system.

Of course, there are already so-called “litte Guantanamos” around the US — “Communications Management Units,” or secret prisons populated almost exclusively with Arab and Muslim detainees so as to segregate them from the general prison population.

Following the dismissing of an appeal for the Holy Land Foundation Case, Noor Elashi described on Counterpunch last week how her father — one of five men persecuted and convicted in the US because of the their humanitarian work in support of Palestinians living under US-funded Israeli occupation — has ended up in one of these facilities, and how his “significantly diminished phone calls and visitations are scheduled in advance and live-monitored from Washington DC.”

Will this become the bleak reality for not just Palestinian political prisoners in the US, but also those who stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people? It’s a serious question as the US government moves to further criminalize solidarity with the Palestinian people — as they have criminalized almost all of Palestinian society itself by placing all the major Palestinian political parties (except that which collaborates with the US and Israel) on the State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organization list.

The US State Department has threatened more than once to use the material support laws against organizers of the US Boat to Gaza. And if passed, a bill introduced in Congress in October would require the State Department to investigate US Boat to Gaza organizers for “terrorist” ties, as Ali Abunimah reported last month.

Gotta stay united and develop friendships with your fellow activists. Never know who will be your cellmate. #NDAA
Dec 16 via webFavoriteRetweetReply

Homeland Security Police are here at civil rights rally. #indefinite#detentionhttp://t.co/MtKGSB61
Dec 15 via Twitter for BlackBerry®FavoriteRetweetReply

Who’s a “domestic terrorist”?

The proposed legislation to allow the US military to indefinitely detain without trial “domestic terrorism” suspects who are US citizens is especially scary considering that political activists are increasingly being treated as terrorists — whether it be animal welfare activists investigating factory farms or activists who organized in protest of the 2008 Republican National Convention. And now the Chicago Police Department is creating a counterterrorism unit for the May 2012 NATO and G8 summits in Chicago, at the same time that the city refuses to meet with or issue protest permits to antiwar activists mobilizing large demonstrations against the meetings.

Political repression in the US

Prosecuting Palestine solidarity activists for support of terrorism and going after environmentalists and animal rights organizers is not about protecting public safety. It’s about crushing dissent.

The laws banning material support to foreign terrorist organizations has been expanded so broadly in recent years that the US government defines as “material support” immaterial things like political speech, and travel to places like Colombia and Palestine are now grounds for a judge to approve a search warrant on someone’s home — things thought to be protected by the first amendment.

And Glenn Greenwald, the aforementioned constitutional law attorney, had this to say about the use of para-militarized forces to crush Occupy Wall Street protests around the US:

A country cannot radically reduce quality-of-life expectations, devote itself to the interests of its super-rich, and all but eliminate its middle class without triggering sustained citizen fury.

The reason the U.S. has para-militarized its police forces is precisely to control this type of domestic unrest, and it’s simply impossible to imagine its not being deployed in full against a growing protest movement aimed at grossly and corruptly unequal resource distribution. As Madeleine Albright said when arguing for U.S. military intervention in the Balkans: “What’s the point of having this superb military you’re always talking about if we can’t use it?” That’s obviously how governors, big-city Mayors and Police Chiefs feel about the stockpiles of assault rifles, SWAT gear, hi-tech helicopters, and the coming-soon drone technology lavished on them in the wake of the post/9-11 Security State explosion, to say nothing of the enormous federal law enforcement apparatus that, more than anything else, resembles a standing army which is increasingly directed inward.

Most of this militarization has been justified by invoking Scary Foreign Threats — primarily the Terrorist — but its prime purpose is domestic. As civil libertarians endlessly point out, the primary reason to oppose new expansions of government power is because it always — always — vastly expands beyond its original realm.

Reasons to be hopeful

It’s easy to get depressed about the increasingly repressive conditions in the US. But there are reasons to be hopeful.

I’m inspired and humbled by the courage shown by campus solidarity activists in the wake of the Irvine 11 convictions. Students are showing that they have not been intimidated into silence and are continuing to challenge Israeli government spokespersons and their propagandists.

The potential for true change was made brilliantly clear this year when huge numbers of people come out into the streets for a common goal — whether it be protecting workers’ rights in Wisconsin, calling for the downfall of the regimes in Tunisia and Egypt or for economic justice on Wall Street. Or when young Palestinians born refugees in Syria and Lebanon attempted to march back to their homeland, unafraid of Israel’s landmines and machine guns.

Because of collective action’s power to change, this is precisely why it is being so severely repressed in the US right now. We must stay strong, keep our chins up and keep fighting for a better future.

One year after FBI subpoena, civil liberties protections in US frighteningly eroded even further

A year ago yesterday, I got the dreaded house call from the FBI. I was at home working when two agents rang my buzzer and asked to speak with me.

I had been expecting such a visit; on 24 September 2010 the FBI raided the homes of prominent anti-war and international solidarity organizers I have worked with over the years in Chicago, as well as the homes of activists in the Twin Cities and the office of the Anti War Committee there. In the weeks that followed, more Palestine solidarity organizers and Palestinian Americans in Chicago were delivered subpoenas to appear before a federal grand jury in Chicago as part of an investigation into violations of the laws banning material support for foreign terrorist organizations.

I declined to speak with the two agents who visited me; they then gave me a subpoena to appear before a federal grand jury on 25 January 2011. I spent last Christmas and New Year convinced that I would soon be in federal prison for civil contempt of court. Even though it meant we risked being jailed, all 23 of us who have been subpoenaed as part of this grand jury fishing expedition have refused to testify. We have asserted that our first amendment rights guaranteed by the US Constitution, protecting free speech and freedom of association, are being trampled on.

A first amendment issue

The grand jury — essentially a secret court in which you’re not allowed to have a lawyer, and there is not even a judge presiding over the proceedings — has been long abused as a tool of inquisition into domestic political movements. Indeed, no specific crime has been identified related to our case.

The FBI’s operations manual for the September raids, discovered last April to have been accidentally left amongst a raided activist’s files, make it clear that they wanted to question activists about associational information — who activists know and work with in the US, Colombia and Palestine, and how activists organize and what they believe. They wanted people to name everyone they know who has ever traveled to the Middle East or South America.

It is also obvious the FBI put up the LA County Sheriff to raid the home of veteran Chicano liberation activist Carlos Montes last May; he faces trumped-up technical firearms violation charges and serious prison time. The FBI was on hand during the raid to question Montes about his political associations (an organizer of the 2008 Republican National Convention protests, he was named in the search warrant used to raid the Anti War Committee office) and took material from his home related to his long history of political organizing. They even took a kuffiyeh — the traditional checkered Palestinian scarf — only one example of many demonstrating how federal agents so arbitrarily confiscated property from activists’ homes.

And while the threat of indictments looms, I am not spending Christmas and new year’s in federal prison for civil contempt of court. This is, I believe, thanks to the vocal protest that countless people around the US and around the world have made in support of the 24 of us and in support of civil liberties. This is a huge victory. But at the same time, civil liberties and constitutional protections have further eroded even in the last year. More protest must be shown before the situation gets even worse.

A bad time for civil liberties

Even The New York Times has excoriated the Obama administration over its civil liberties record after its justice department went even further than Bush’s to expand the FBI’s powers to investigate US citizens, “even when there is no firm basis for suspecting any wrongdoing.” In an editorial entitled “Backward at the FBI,” the Times takes the FBI’s new operations manual to task, as revised guidelines “will give agents significant new powers to search law enforcement and private databases, go through household trash or deploy surveillance teams, with even fewer checks against abuse.”

The Times adds:

They also expand the special rules covering “undisclosed participation” in an organization by an FBI agent or informant. The current rules are not public, and, as things stand they still won’t be. But we do know the changes allow an agent or informant to surreptitiously attend up to five meetings of a group before the rules for undisclosed participation — whatever they are — kick in.

[…]

The FBI’s recent history includes the abuse of national security letters to gather information about law-abiding citizens without court orders, and inappropriate investigations of antiwar and environmental activists. That is hardly a foundation for further loosening the rules for conducting investigations or watering down internal record-keeping and oversight.

After that editorial was published in June, things only got worse. The United States government sanctioned and carried out the assassination of one of its citizens on foreign soil despite the fact that he posed no immediate danger to public safety. Vince Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, stated after the Anwar al-Awlaki was killed by a US drone in Yemen:

The targeted assassination program that started under President Bush and expanded under the Obama Administration essentially grants the executive the power to kill any US citizen deemed a threat, without any judicial oversight, or any of the rights afforded by our Constitution. If we allow such gross overreaches of power to continue, we are setting the stage for increasing erosions of civil liberties and the rule of law.

Other stains on civil liberties this year included the persecution and conviction of the the Irvine 11 — a group of students (all of the Muslim, all of them young men) who were subjected to a criminal trial for briefly and nonviolently disrupting the speech of Israeli ambassador Michael Oren.

Tens of chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine said it best in a statement following the convictions:

We unequivocally condemn these charges, which unfairly single out and criminalize Muslim students who chose to exercise their First Amendment right to speak out against Israel’s human rights abuses. Had the speaker not been Israeli, had the issue not been Palestine, had the students not been Muslim, these charges never would have been pursued. Rather, these charges reflect a climate of Islamophobia and an irrational exceptionalism for Israel when it comes to free speech. The charges chill the free exchange of ideas and students’ right to protest at universities nationwide.

Guantanamo comes to the US

But perhaps the scariest development in the war on civil liberties this year is the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2012, which if enacted would allow the indefinite detention of US citizens without trial, not unlike Israel’s use of administrative detention. Indeed, as Human Rights Watch summarizes, “In addition to codifying indefinite detention without charge in US law, the bill would require that the military, rather than federal, state, or local law enforcement, handle certain terrorism cases.”

RT: #NDAA codifies into law military’s power to indefinitely detain any American citizen w/o charges, evidence, or trial. Obama must veto.
Dec 02 via webFavoriteRetweetReply

The bill has been already passed by Congress, and now Obama has dropped his threats to veto the bill. Constitutional law attorney Glenn Greenwald described the potential ramifications of the legislation on Democracy Now!:

it will be the first time that the United States Congress has codified the power of indefinite detention into the law since the McCarthy era of the 1950s. The 1950 Congress passed a bill saying that communists and subversives could be imprisoned without a trial, without full due process, based on the allegation that they presented a national threat, an emergency, a threat to the national security of the United States. President Truman, knowing that the bill would—the veto would be overridden, nonetheless vetoed it and said that it made a mockery of the Bill of Rights. That law was repealed in 1971 with the Non-Detention Act, that said you cannot hold people in prison without charging them with a crime. The war on terror has eroded that principle, under both the Bush and Obama administrations, but Congress is now, with the Democrats in control of the Senate and a Democratic president, is about to enact into law the first bill that will say that the military and the United States government do have this power. It’s muddled whether it applies to US citizens on U.S. soil, but it’s clearly indefinite detention, and there’s a very strong case to make that it includes US citizens, as well, which, as we know, the Obama administration already claims anyway, and that’s what makes it so dangerous.

Not only is the Obama administration not closing Guantanamo, but it is paving the way for more Guantanamo-style indefinite detention of US citizens in a military court system.

Of course, there are already so-called “litte Guantanamos” around the US — “Communications Management Units,” or secret prisons populated almost exclusively with Arab and Muslim detainees so as to segregate them from the general prison population.

Following the dismissing of an appeal for the Holy Land Foundation Case, Noor Elashi described on Counterpunch last week how her father — one of five men persecuted and convicted in the US because of the their humanitarian work in support of Palestinians living under US-funded Israeli occupation — has ended up in one of these facilities, and how his “significantly diminished phone calls and visitations are scheduled in advance and live-monitored from Washington DC.”

Will this become the bleak reality for not just Palestinian political prisoners in the US, but also those who stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people? It’s a serious question as the US government moves to further criminalize solidarity with the Palestinian people — as they have criminalized almost all of Palestinian society itself by placing all the major Palestinian political parties (except that which collaborates with the US and Israel) on the State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organization list.

The US State Department has threatened more than once to use the material support laws against organizers of the US Boat to Gaza. And if passed, a bill introduced in Congress in October would require the State Department to investigate US Boat to Gaza organizers for “terrorist” ties, as Ali Abunimah reported last month.

Gotta stay united and develop friendships with your fellow activists. Never know who will be your cellmate. #NDAA
Dec 16 via webFavoriteRetweetReply

Homeland Security Police are here at civil rights rally. #indefinite#detentionhttp://t.co/MtKGSB61
Dec 15 via Twitter for BlackBerry®FavoriteRetweetReply

Who’s a “domestic terrorist”?

The proposed legislation to allow the US military to indefinitely detain without trial “domestic terrorism” suspects who are US citizens is especially scary considering that political activists are increasingly being treated as terrorists — whether it be animal welfare activists investigating factory farms or activists who organized in protest of the 2008 Republican National Convention. And now the Chicago Police Department is creating a counterterrorism unit for the May 2012 NATO and G8 summits in Chicago, at the same time that the city refuses to meet with or issue protest permits to antiwar activists mobilizing large demonstrations against the meetings.

Political repression in the US

Prosecuting Palestine solidarity activists for support of terrorism and going after environmentalists and animal rights organizers is not about protecting public safety. It’s about crushing dissent.

The laws banning material support to foreign terrorist organizations has been expanded so broadly in recent years that the US government defines as “material support” immaterial things like political speech, and travel to places like Colombia and Palestine are now grounds for a judge to approve a search warrant on someone’s home — things thought to be protected by the first amendment.

And Glenn Greenwald, the aforementioned constitutional law attorney, had this to say about the use of para-militarized forces to crush Occupy Wall Street protests around the US:

A country cannot radically reduce quality-of-life expectations, devote itself to the interests of its super-rich, and all but eliminate its middle class without triggering sustained citizen fury.

The reason the U.S. has para-militarized its police forces is precisely to control this type of domestic unrest, and it’s simply impossible to imagine its not being deployed in full against a growing protest movement aimed at grossly and corruptly unequal resource distribution. As Madeleine Albright said when arguing for U.S. military intervention in the Balkans: “What’s the point of having this superb military you’re always talking about if we can’t use it?” That’s obviously how governors, big-city Mayors and Police Chiefs feel about the stockpiles of assault rifles, SWAT gear, hi-tech helicopters, and the coming-soon drone technology lavished on them in the wake of the post/9-11 Security State explosion, to say nothing of the enormous federal law enforcement apparatus that, more than anything else, resembles a standing army which is increasingly directed inward.

Most of this militarization has been justified by invoking Scary Foreign Threats — primarily the Terrorist — but its prime purpose is domestic. As civil libertarians endlessly point out, the primary reason to oppose new expansions of government power is because it always — always — vastly expands beyond its original realm.

Reasons to be hopeful

It’s easy to get depressed about the increasingly repressive conditions in the US. But there are reasons to be hopeful.

I’m inspired and humbled by the courage shown by campus solidarity activists in the wake of the Irvine 11 convictions. Students are showing that they have not been intimidated into silence and are continuing to challenge Israeli government spokespersons and their propagandists.

The potential for true change was made brilliantly clear this year when huge numbers of people come out into the streets for a common goal — whether it be protecting workers’ rights in Wisconsin, calling for the downfall of the regimes in Tunisia and Egypt or for economic justice on Wall Street. Or when young Palestinians born refugees in Syria and Lebanon attempted to march back to their homeland, unafraid of Israel’s landmines and machine guns.

Because of collective action’s power to change, this is precisely why it is being so severely repressed in the US right now. We must stay strong, keep our chins up and keep fighting for a better future.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Stop the persecution: Solidarity is not a crime

The following talk was given, Nov. 5, at the first national conference of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression, in Chicago. Sundin is a leader in the anti-war movement. Her home was among those raided by the FBI, on Sept. 24, 2010.

by Jess Sundin

Sisters and brothers, I’m so glad to be here with you today. I’m honored to speak on the same platform with so many people I respect, whose examples I strive to follow. Not only my friend, Carlos Montes, but also the speakers you will hear later – the families of political prisoners from the Palestinian struggle – Sami Al Arian, Ghassan Elashi and Abdelhaleem Ashqar. These men, like Carlos, have dedicated their lives to the liberation of their peoples and making this world a more just one for all of us.

We are here today because the powers that be will do anything to silence voices for justice. U.S. imperialists have bombed out whole cities, killed, tortured and starved millions of people – all in the pursuit of power and profit. We are here today as those who have raised our voices to oppose imperialist wars. We have organized our communities to stand in solidarity with the oppressed, those directly in the crosshairs of the imperialist war machine.

And yet, they dare to call us the terrorists, to treat us as the criminals. But turning reality on its head cannot save them as their grip on the world slips every day. From the Arab uprisings to Occupy Wall Street, and all points in between, the war criminals are losing ground. They cannot control the will of the peoples of the Middle East or South America, so they make criminals of those here in the U.S. who support self-determination for the world’s peoples.

I visited Iraq in 1998, after then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright told the world that U.S. policy objectives were worth the cost of half a million dead Iraqi children. Since then, I have known that the U.S. government would do anything, pay any price, to clear the way for their agenda. When the FBI burst through my front door last September, this knowledge became very personal. That was the beginning of an open campaign of repression that has ensnared 24 of us in a government investigation of material support for terrorism.

The law banning material support criminalizes work that has been done by countless movements for decades – the struggle against apartheid in South Africa, support for the Irish Republican struggle, the Central America solidarity movement and many more. If this kind of work is illegal, then sign me up for some civil disobedience! Joking aside, we cannot allow the government to criminalize this very important work. To defend us, is to defend every acts of international solidarity.

The search warrant for my home authorized the FBI to seize any correspondence with anyone living in Colombia or Palestine; anything about travel to Colombia or Palestine, or anywhere; address books and phone lists; anything about the Anti-War Committee and much more. After five hours of searching, eight FBI agents seized several boxes of political and personal material, mostly paper, that might only offer evidence of who I know or what I believe. They left my partner and I each a subpoena to appear before a grand jury here in Chicago.

As you know, we, like all the others in our case, refused to testify. The decision was easy – none of us would ever agree to testify, betraying our friends and colleagues, the organizations we have helped to build and the movements we have worked in solidarity with. At the same time, we knew the government could punish us for this decision – as they have done to Drs. Ashqar and Al Arian, whose stories we will hear later. Several of us made custodial arrangements for who would care for our young children, should the government choose to jail us for refusing to testify. So far, your work has protected us from the contempt charges that have imprisoned others. We know the government could change course at any time, but still we will not testify.

We are here today, more than a year after the raids on our homes, because we believe the government is still working to bring formal charges against us. They have repeatedly said as much to our attorneys – they are seeking multiple indictments. We don’t know how many, and we don’t know when they will come done. [Some say the grand jury ends in June 2012.]

You may have read that some of our property was finally returned last week, after more than a year! While it’s certainly nice to have our copy of the Anti-War Committee database, or our copy of the petitions people signed to end U.S. military aid to Israel, it makes me sick that the FBI has digitally copied everything they took from all of our homes and offices. Literally, as I unpacked the boxes, my stomach turned with each item that had someone else’s name and number on it, as I imagined them being caught up in the FBI’s net. That the government can come into your home, without even a criminal charge against you, take whatever they want, keep it for a year, and keep their own copy forever, is such a violation of our most basic civil liberties. So for me, the return of my property is not a cause for celebration. Instead, it makes this all much more ominous, as I imagine decades of my work now being stored in FBI databases, to use however they wish.

Some of you may also be aware of the FBI’s own secret documents, mistakenly left behind in one of our homes last September. If you haven’t seen them yet, you can find them on our website at stopfbi.net. The documents were the FBI’s operations plan for Sept. 24.

They outline a plan for a highly-militarized assault on a one bedroom apartment above a restaurant in Minneapolis. Hundreds of rounds of ammunition, hand guns and automatic rifles, snipers, a hostage negotiator, directions to the nearest trauma center- it goes on and on. We don’t know what was planned at every home they raided on Sept. 24, but I know they were poised with a battering ram, when my partner and then-six-year-old daughter opened the front door of our home. Some 70 agents were involved in simultaneous raids in Minneapolis and Chicago, as well as questioning our colleagues from North Carolina and Michigan, to Milwaukee and San Jose. The operations plans reveal that six different FBI field offices are involved in this investigation.

The documents also include more than 100 interview questions they hoped to ask, if any of us had volunteered to talk while they were raiding our homes. Some of them were for everyone, and some were individual questions. One sister was asked about her husband’s immigration status, another was to be asked, “Did you ever recruit anyone to go to Israel, the West Bank, or Gaza?” They were going to ask me if I had ever lied to a grand jury. But most of the questions, to be asked of everyone, read as if they had been pulled out of a dusty old file from the McCarthy era: “Have you ever heard of Freedom Road Socialist Organization? Who are the leaders? Who are the members? What is discussed at meetings? Does anyone take notes? Where are those notes?” and on and on and on.

Freedom Road is an open organization – with a website and a newspaper, and people like me who are known, public members. The U.S. constitution guarantees the right to freely associate with like-minded people. Between the economic crisis at home, and the brutal wars abroad, it is no wonder that some people are looking for an alternative to capitalism, and for us in Freedom Road, the alternative we advocate is socialism. It is not a crime to be a socialist, any more than it is a crime to be a Palestinian or a Muslim. But the government wants to prosecute us for our thoughts, thought crimes.

You know what? I do oppose the policies of the U.S. government, a fact I have been very public about. I have organized marches of 30,000 to say no to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. I have spoken out about the humanitarian crisis I witnessed in Iraq, created by sanctions and war. I have hosted women trade unionists from Colombia and Palestine, to tell people here about the impacts of U.S. policy on their peoples. I have written and spoken about my trip to Colombia, where I met with FARC guerrillas who were at that time, engaged in a peace dialogue with the U.S.-backed Colombian regime.

I think this country is run by criminals who place no value on human life. Shame on them for accusing me of terrorism, as they carry it out every day in countries across this globe. But to clear the way for more new wars abroad, and more attacks on people here at home, they are doing just that. And for me, the stakes could not be higher.

If every protest I have organized, every trip I have taken, or helped others take, every time I have spoken in support of self-determination for oppressed peoples, every dime I have helped to raise for daycares in Palestine; if each of these is a count of material support, each punishable by 15-year sentences, then I face the rest of my life in prison. Yes, I will fight these charges in court, but the real battle will be won or lost on the streets, in the political realm.

We need a broad base of support and massive public outcry to compel the prosecutors to close this grand jury without indictments. We know that grand juries are basically indictment machines. If the prosecutors aren’t persuaded to drop this case, some number of us will face very serious charges. I thank you for the work you have already done. We are relying on you to keep the pressure on, to raise funds for our defense and to continue the important work of international solidarity.

I want to end by telling you about morning our home was raided. My daughter’s classmate walked by on the way to catch the school bus. Her friend asked what was happening, and Leila told her that the FBI was raiding our house. The friend asked why, and Leila answered, “It’s because we work for peace, and they want us to be quiet.” We refuse to be silent in the face of injustice and war. Please raise your voices with us: “From Colombia to Palestine, international solidarity is not a crime!”

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Committee to Stop FBI Repression conference: Successful and inspiring

Building a broad front against FBI and U.S. government repression

November 8, 2011 Fight Back! News
Many of those subpoenaed or raided by the FBI in the fall of 2011 along with spe
Many of those subpoenaed or raided by the FBI in the fall of 2011 along with speakers from the morning panel of the conference. (Fight Back! News/Staff)

Chicago, IL - Over 150 people gathered here, Nov. 5, for the first national conference of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression.

Conference organizer Tom Burke said, "The national conference was a grand success. We united movement leaders from Florida to San Jose, from New Jersey to L.A., in opposing political repression, Islamophobia and the criminalization of whole communities. We dedicated ourselves to a campaign in solidarity with the famous Chicano leader and anti-war activist Carlos Montes, demanding "Drop the charges!" We discussed how, with the upsurge around the Occupy Wall Street movement, we are joining in efforts to lead protests while also popularizing the Carlos Montes solidarity campaign. With local police, directed by the FBI, arresting thousands of Occupy Wall Street movement protesters, there is an opportunity to organize thousands against political repression and to support Carlos Montes. If we go out and organize, we can beat these attacks."

The Committee to Stop FBI Repression was formed in September, 2010 after anti-war and international solidarity activists’ homes were raided by the FBI and 23 people were subpoenaed before a Chicago-based grand jury in a witch hunt chasing after phony ‘material support for terrorism’ charges.

This conference brought together supporters of the 23 activists, along with Carlos Montes, whose Los Angeles home was raided on orders from the FBI this past May as part of the same witch hunt, as well as family members of Arab and Muslim political prisoners in the U.S.

The conference passed resolutions committing to focus on defeating the charges against Carlos Montes; reaffirming the Pledge to Resist in support of the 23 anti-war and international solidarity activists who have refused to appear before the Chicago grand jury; and to build a broad front against U.S. government repression.

The last resolution recognizes the reality that the only way to stop the very serious attacks on so many Palestinians, Muslims, Arabs and anti-war and solidarity activists is through building broad unity to defend everyone under attack. Speakers emphasized that the laws and court interpretations have become so bad that they have unleashed a general wave of repression that must be pushed back against as a whole.

There were also resolutions passed in support of continuing international solidarity work with Palestine and in support of mobilizing for mass anti-war protests at the G-8 and NATO meetings in Chicago in May 2012.
The resolution calling for a broad front against repression reads, in part:

“The government of the U.S. has constructed an immense repressive apparatus that is aimed at the Arab and Muslim communities, other oppressed peoples, and progressive social movements. The tools used by this apparatus include spying and surveillance, anti-democratic grand juries, repressive legislation, preemptive prosecutions and imprisonment. We condemn the green scare repression and the police violence that has been directed at occupy Wall Street/occupy everywhere movement.

“These attacks on our democratic and civil rights need to be meet with an effort to build the broadest possible united front against repression. Repressive legislation, such as the ‘Patriot Act’ and laws on ‘material support’ should be scrapped. Those who are facing repression need to be supported. We favor cooperation and coalitions with those who are working towards these ends. We will do everything in our power to put an end to these attacks. We understand the need for solidarity and that an injury to one is an injury to all.”

An impressive and inspiring range of speakers addressed the conference. There were family members of Palestinian, Arab and Muslim people facing political repression speaking alongside representatives of the 23 from the anti-war movement, as well as lawyers and activists from other organizations fighting against repression.

Sarah Smith of the Chicago Committee Against Political Repression opened the conference. She was one of the 23 activists subpoenaed to a grand jury because of her solidarity with Palestine. Tom Burke of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression, who was also subpoenaed, welcomed people to the conference.

Carlos Montes, the Chicano movement leader, anti-war and immigrant rights activist whose home was raided and ransacked by the FBI and L.A. County Sheriffs, spoke in the morning about his activism and the repression he is facing. Montes faces six felony charges is mounting a vigorous political and legal defense.

Jeff Mackler spoke for the United National Antiwar Coalition (UNAC) about the importance of defending the anti-war and international solidarity activists facing repression and the need to support all those under attack by the U.S. government. Mackler talked about his early political activism protesting against the McCarthyite wave of anti-communist repression, including the House Unamerican Activities Committee.

Jim Fennerty of the National Lawyers Guild and Jess Sundin of the Minnesota Anti-War Committee explained the case of the 23 anti-war and solidarity activists. They made it very clear that although the raids happened over a year ago, all signs point to the fact that the government is still planning to bring multiple indictments to try to jail people for a long time on ‘material support of terrorism’ charges. So, while it’s a good sign that nobody has been jailed for refusing to testify to the grand jury and that nobody has been indicted yet, it would be very unwise for people to think that the case is over. Fennerty made reference to the Holy Land 5 case, in which the government took several years before bringing the indictments that ultimately led to convictions and 65-year prison sentences.

Speak Out Against Repression

The next panel was the most moving of the conference, featuring family members and friends of people imprisoned for their ideas and political activism. Alejandro Molina of the National Boricua Human Rights Network spoke about the ongoing imprisonment of Puerto Rican independence activists.

Ali Al-Arian spoke about the case of his father, Dr. Sami Al-Arian. Al-Arian has been through a years-long ordeal of imprisonment, isolation and multiple grand juries which he refused to speak to. Sharmin Sadequee spoke movingly about the case of her brother Shifa Sadequee. Noor Elashi also spoke movingly on the case of her father Ghassan Elashi and the Holy Land 5. The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Muslim charity in the U.S. and sent humanitarian aid to Palestine as well as other places. In Palestine they sent money to the same community organizations that the USAID and other international agencies also sent money to. But after 9/11, the Holy Land Foundation was shut down and the directors ultimately jailed for terms up to 65 years for ‘material support of terrorism.’ Mrs. Asmaa Ashqar spoke of the case of her husband Dr. Ashqar, who was one of the first people jailed under the 1996 anti-terrorism laws. Finally, Hatem Abudayyeh of the U.S. Palestinian Community Network spoke. He is one of the 23 solidarity activists raided last September and has been an outspoken advocate of Palestinian national unity and liberation.

After this panel there were workshops on labor solidarity, student activism, Palestine solidarity and legislative work.

Solidarity Forever

During lunch there were video solidarity messages from Cornel West and Robert Meerpol, who were unable to attend the conference but sent their greetings. West praised the Committee to Stop FBI Repression and the 23 activists who have refused to cooperate with the grand jury witch hunt for keeping up vocal and vigorous activism. Meerpol, whose parents Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed in the 1950s during the McCarthyite anti-communist witch hunt, sent a message about the importance of this case. Jacques Rivera was also saluted. Rivera was wrongfully convicted in Chicago, Illinois and after years of campaigning for his freedom, he was finally freed in October after 21 years in prison. Stephanie Weiner, who had worked for his freedom with the Comite Exijimos Justicia, gave a moving talk about his struggle. Rivera emphasized the need to continue working to free all people who are unjustly imprisoned.

Understanding and Opposing FBI Repression, Grand Juries, and Pre-emptive Prosecution

After lunch there was a panel of legal experts and activists. The panel was introduced by Abayomi Azikiwe, of the Michigan Emergency Coalition Against War and Injustice (MECAWI), who talked about the link between U.S. wars and repression at home.

Michael Deutsch of the People’s Law Office spoke on the political use of grand juries and conspiracy charges. Steve Downs of Project Salam spoke on pre-emptive prosecutions and ‘thought crimes.’ Kay Guinane of the Charity and Security Network spoke about efforts to amend the ‘material support’ law and about the conflict between the Supreme Court’s Humanitarian Law Project vs. Holder decision and free speech. Shahid Buttar of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee spoke on the material support standard, ending the Patriot Act and local civil rights defense. Meredith Aby of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression spoke on the need to build a broad front against repression.

Another set of workshops then covered the upcoming G8/NATO meeting in Chicago and the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida, and the certainty of repression against activists protesting those events; mapping the landscape for struggle against repression; the immigrant rights movement and the fight against repression; and the Occupy Wall Street movement and political repression.

Finally there was a plenary where the above-mentioned resolutions were presented and passed. The plenary was introduced by Prexy Nesbitt, who played an important role in the South Africa anti-apartheid movement.

The conference was an important effort to build the movement to defend Carlos Montes and the 23 anti-war activists subpoenaed before a grand jury witch hunt in Chicago. The conference also put the case in the context of the growing repression over the past 15 years against Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims and built deeper ties of unity and solidarity with all people facing this wave of repression, with a deeper commitment to push back against the U.S. government’s wave of repression as a whole.

Friday, November 04, 2011

FBI confirms that they copied tens of thousands of documents seized from the homes of local anti-war activists; originals returned, indictments still

For Immediate Release
November 1, 2011

  • FBI finishes copying more than 50,000 pages of materials seized from homes of Minneapolis peace and international solidarity activists – now they give back the originals
  • Serious FBI violation of civil rights

Photo opportunity: Anti war activists and the returned boxes of materials seized by FBI will be available November 2, 4:30 pm at DeLeon and Nestor Law Office, 3547 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis.

The FBI says they have finished copying the political material and personal papers seized in the September 24, 2010, raids on the homes of Twin Cities anti-war and international solidarity activists. This afternoon, November 1, FBI agents delivered the last batch of notebooks, family photos, membership lists for anti-war groups, and political documents to the office of attorney Bruce Nestor. The FBI has been returning the material seized in the raids over the last several weeks.

“This is a serious violation of our right to organize against war,” states Jess Sundin of the Twin Cities-based Anti-War Committee. “The FBI took the computers from the office of the Anti-War Committee and made copies of lists that include thousands of our supporters. They copied notes from meetings and plans for events. They took our personal papers, political materials and books from my home. They are stepping all over our rights to organize, associate and speak out.”

The material that the FBI copied and returned comes from the homes of Twin Cities activists Jess Sundin, Steff Yorek, Mick Kelly, Meredith Aby, Anh Pham and Tracy Molm, and the office of the Anti-War Committee. They are among the 23 anti-war and international solidarity activists summoned to appear in front of a Chicago grand jury headed by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, investigating ‘material support for terrorism.’

The U.S. Attorney’s office is threatening to indict the anti-war activists.

Mick Kelly, of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression states, “We have done nothing wrong. The FBI should destroy the copies of everything they took.”

The FBI returned the copied material only after Attorney Bruce Nestor filed a motion in Federal Court to demanding that Jess Sundin’s property be returned. The hearing on that motion, scheduled for November 10, will be canceled once activists confirm that everything was indeed returned.

More than 20 Twin Cities activists will attend the national conference organized by the Committee to Stop FBI repression in Chicago this Saturday, Nov. 5, to build the fight against the ongoing attacks on anti-war and international solidarity activists.

For more information contact:

  • Jess Sundin: 612-272-2209
  • Mick Kelly: 612-715-3280
  • Bruce Nestor: 612- 659-9019

Saturday, September 24, 2011

FBI Still Going After Activists



On September 24 of 2010, the FBI raided the homes of anti-war activists across the country. According to the FBI, the warrants they had were seeking evidence in support of an ongoing Joint Terrorism Task Force investigation into activities concerning the material support of terrorism. To date, 24 activists have been targeted and most are still waiting to see what will happen to them, while their personal belongings that were taken in the raids, including passports, have not been returned. Jess Sundin, anti-war activist whose home was raided joins the show.

One year since the September 24 FBI Raids and Grand Jury Subpoenas

Build the Movement Against Political Repression

One year since the September 24 FBI Raids and Grand Jury Subpoenas

Statement of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression, 9-22-2011

The Committee to Stop FBI Repression (CSFR) is asking you to build
the movement against political repression on the one-year anniversary
of the Sept. 24, 2010 FBI raids on anti-war and international
solidarity activists. We need your continued solidarity as we build
movements for peace, justice and equality.

The storm of political repression continues to expand and threaten.
It is likely to intensify and churn into a destructive force with
indictments, trials, and attempts to imprison anti-war activists. The
last we knew, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald was preparing multiple
indictments as he and Attorney General Eric Holder attempt to
criminalize the targeted activists and the movements to which we
dedicate our lives.

It is one year since the FBI raided two homes in Chicago and five
homes plus the Anti-War Committee office in Minneapolis, eventually
handing out 23 subpoenas. The anti-war activists' homes were turned
upside down and notebooks, cell phones, artwork, computers, passports
and personal belongings were all carted off by the FBI. Anyone who
has ever been robbed knows the feelings - shock and anger.

The man responsible for this assault on activists and their families,
on free speech and the right to organize, is U.S. Attorney Patrick
Fitzgerald in Chicago. Fitzgerald has an ugly record of getting
powerful Republicans like Dick Cheney and Karl Rove off the hook,
while mercilessly pursuing an agenda to scare America into silence
and submission with the phony 'war on terror.' Fitzgerald is
attempting to criminalize anti-war activists with accusations of
'material support for terrorism,' involving groups in Palestine and Colombia.

First the U.S. government targeted Arabs and Muslims, violating their
civil rights and liberties and spying on them. Then they came for the
anti-war and international solidarity activists. We refuse to be
criminalized. We continue to speak out and organize. We say,
"Opposing U.S. war and occupation is not a crime!" We are currently
building a united front with groups and movements to defeat
Fitzgerald's reactionary, fear mongering assault on anti-war activism
and to restore civil liberties taken away by the undemocratic USA PATRIOT Act.

Many people know the developments in the case, but for those who do
not, we invite you to read a
timeline

at
stopfbi.net.

We think the repression centers on this: During the lead up to the
Republican National Convention in Saint Paul, Minnesota, a federal
law enforcement officer, using the phony name of "Karen Sullivan" got
involved and joined the Anti-War Committee and Freedom Road Socialist
Organization in Minneapolis. She lied to everyone she met and helped
the FBI to disrupt many activities in the anti-war, international
solidarity and labor movements in Minnesota - and also other states
and even over in Palestine. It is outrageous.

In fact, many of those being investigated travelled to Colombia or
Palestine to learn firsthand about U.S. government funding for war
and oppression. There was no money given to any groups that the U.S.
government lists as terrorist organizations. However, we met people
who are a lot like most Americans - students, community organizers,
religious leaders, trade unionists, women's group leaders and
activists much like ourselves. Many of the U.S. activists wrote about
their trips, did educational events, or helped organized protests
against U.S. militarism and war. In a increasingly repressive period,
this is enough to make one a suspect in Fitzgerald's office.

This struggle is far from one-sided however. The response to the FBI
raids and the pushback from the movement is tremendous. Minneapolis
and Chicago immediately organized a number of press conferences and
rallies with hundreds of people. Over the first two weeks after the
raids, 60 cities protested outside FBI offices, from New York to
Kalamazoo, from traveled to the Bay Area. The National Lawyers Guild
convention was in New Orleans the day of the FBI raids and they
immediately issued a solidarity statement and got to work on the
case. Solidarity poured in from anti-war, civil rights, religious and
faith groups, students and unions. Groups and committees began
working to obtain letters of support from members of Congress. The
solidarity was overwhelming. It was great!

It is possible that U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald thought he was picking
on an isolated group of activists. Instead, those raided proved to
have many friends and allies from decades of work for social justice
and peace. Over the months, all the targeted activists refused to
appear at the grand jury dates set by U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald's
office. In November 2010, a large crew of us travelled to New York
City to found the Committee to Stop FBI Repression, after the United
National Antiwar Committee meeting.

In December 2010, U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald's office called in three
of the Minnesota women and threatened them. We prepared a campaign in
case they were jailed for refusing to speak. The FBI also delivered
subpoenas to nine more Arab-American and Palestine solidarity
activists in December. Their grand jury date was on Jan. 25, 2011,
and we organized protests in over 70 American cities, plus a few
overseas. The movement was building and expanding, so we organized
conferences with over 800 participants in the Midwest, the South, and
on the East and West Coasts. While we were organizing a pushback, the
FBI was making new plans.

On May 17, 2011, at 5:00 a.m., the Los Angeles, California Sheriff,
under the direction of the FBI, busted down the front door of Chicano
leader Carlos Montes, storming in with automatic weapons drawn and
shouting. The early morning raid was supposedly about weapons and
permits, but they seized decades of notes and writings about the
Chicano, immigrant rights, education rights and anti-war movements.
The FBI attempted to question Carlos Montes while he was handcuffed
and in the back of a L.A. sheriff squad car. Montes is going to
another preliminary court date on Sept. 29, prepared to face six
felony charges, carrying up to three years in prison for each,
knowing he is extraordinarily targeted by the FBI. We will walk every
step of the way with Carlos Montes, and more. Montes was with us at
the Republican National Convention protests; his name was included on
the search warrant for the Anti-War Committee office in Minneapolis,
and the FBI attempted to question him about this case. We ask you to
support Carlos Montes and to organize speaking events with him and
local protests on his important court dates, Sept. 29 being the next one.

The same week the FBI raided Carlos Montes in May 2011, the CSFR came
back with a big revelation - we released a set of documents, the FBI
game plan, which the FBI mistakenly left behind in a file drawer at
one of the homes. The
FBI

documents are on the CSFR website and are fascinating to read.
Fitzgerald and company developed 102 questions that come right from a
McCarthy witch-hunt trial of the 1950s. It is like turning back the
clock five decades.

The whole intention of the raids is clear: They want to paint
activists as 'terrorists' and shut down the organizing. They came at
a time when the rich and powerful are frightened of not just the
masses of people overseas, but of the people in their own country.
With a failing U.S. war in Afghanistan, a U.S. occupation of Iraq
predicted to last decades, a new war for oil and domination in Libya,
a failing immigration policy that breaks up families and produces
super-profits for big business, and now a long and deep economic
crisis that is pushing large segments of working people into poverty,
the highest levels of the U.S. government are turning to political repression.

The only hope for the future is in building stronger, consistent and
determined movements. In a principled act of solidarity, the 23
subpoenaed activists refuse to testify before the grand jury. This
sets an example for others.

In addition, the outpouring of support and mobilization into the
streets from the anti-war, international solidarity, civil rights,
labor and immigrant rights movements means that not one of the 24 has
spent a single day in jail. That is a victory.

We ask you to stand with us, to stay vigilant and to hold steady as
we proceed to organize against wars abroad and injustice at home and
as we defend Carlos Montes from the FBI charade in Los Angeles.

Please come to the Committee to Stop FBI Repression one-day
Conference

in Chicago on November 5, 2011.

Committee to Stop FBI Repression - www.stopfbi.net

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Action Alert: June 16: Day of Action in Solidarity with Carlos Montes

June 16: Day of Action in Solidarity with Carlos Montes

Take Action in Solidarity with Carlos Montes, Veteran Chicano Activist and
Immigrants’ Rights Leader

Join the National Day of Action - Thursday, June 16, 2011
RSVP on Facebook
We are calling for protests on the day that Carlos Montes appears in court in the
aftermath of the FBI and Los Angeles Sheriff’s raid on his home. Please organize an
action in your city - then email the info to us (info@stopfbi.net) and we will post
it to the StopFBI.net website.

Carlos Montes at rally following FBI / LA sheriff raid on his home.
Expansion of FBI Repression
In an expansion and intensification of FBI repression of political activists, a SWAT
Team along with the FBI smashed down the door and rushed in with automatic weapons
as Carlos Montes’ slept in his home on May 17, 2011 at 5:00 AM. Carlos is a longtime
Chicano activist and active member of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression. The
raiders ransacked his house, taking his computer, cell phones and hundreds of
documents, photos, diskettes and mementos of his current political activities in the
pro-immigrant rights and Chicano civil rights movement. Hundreds of historical
documents related to the Chicano movement were taken away. He was arrested on one
charge dealing with a firearm code and released on bail the following morning.
This attack on Carlos Montes is part of the campaign of FBI harassment targeting 23
peace and justice activists which has until now been centered in the Midwest. Carlos
Montes’ name was listed on the search warrant left in the office of the Minneapolis
Anti-War Committee last September 24. An FBI agent approached Carlos while he was in
a squad car and asked him questions about the Freedom Road Socialist Organization.
Carlos Montes has done nothing wrong. This is an attack on him and an attack on the
Chicano movement for equality. Carlos has been involved and a committed leader in
the immigrant rights, anti war, solidarity, and quality education movements his
whole life. Please stand with Carlos and defend all the movements for equality and
justice.
On June 16, Carlos Montes will appear in court. We need your support. Join in
protest with thousands across the country and demand:

Drop the Charges Against Carlos Montes!
Stop FBI Attacks on the Chicano and Immigrant Rights Movements!
Stop FBI Repression of Anti-War and International Solidarity Activists NOW!
Take Action! Please organize a local protest or picket in your city on Thursday,
June 16.

E-mail us at info@stopfbi.net or leave a comment on this page to let us know what
you have planned.
Check out www.StopFBI.net to see if there is an action in your area.
If you have not already done so, please sign the Carlos Montes petition.
In solidarity,
The Committee to Stop FBI Repression


Actions and protests




, - Call A.G. Holder June 14 - Drop the Charges Against Carlos Montes

Alhambra, California - Come to the Alhambra Courthouse June 16!

Asheville, North Carolina - WALKOUT! Movie showing and meeting in solidarity with
Carlos Montes

Bluffton, South Carolina - Carlos Montes Solidarity Rally, Bluffton SC

Chicago, Illinois - Chicago Rally at Federal Building in Solidarity with Immigrants
Rights and Chicano Activist Carlos Montes

Dallas, Texas - Dallas Solidarity Protest with Carlos Montes

El Paso, Texas - Rally in Support of Carlos Montes - El Paso, TX

Gainesville, Florida - Protest in solidarity with Carlos Montes - Gainesville

Hartford, Connecticut - Press conference and picket in Hartford in solidarity with
Carlos Montes

Kalamazoo, Michigan - Vigil in Solidarity with Carlos Montes, Veteran Chicano
Activist and Immigrants’ Rights Leader

Milwaukee, Wisconsin - Protest in solidarity with immigrants’ rights leader Carlos
Montes

Minneapolis, Minnesota - Protest FBI Repression! Support Carlos Montes!

New York City, New York - NY Groups to Join Nationwide Protests as Federal
Government Expands Repression of Political Activists

Oakland, California - Bay Area Solidarity Rally: Stop FBI Attacks on Political
Activists

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - Philadelphia protest in solidarity with Carlos Montes

Raleigh, North Carolina - Raleigh Protest at Federal Building in Solidarity with
Immigrants Rights and Chicano Activist Carlos Montes

Salt Lake City, Utah - Protest in Solidarity with Carlos Montes in Salt Lake City, UT

San Jose, California - San Jose Film Showing and Meeting in Solidarity with Carlos
Montes

Seattle, Washington - Seattle Solidarity Rally

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Chicano Activist Denounces Search Warrant Execution and His Arrest

Supporters accuse FBI of targeting peace activists like they did during the 1960s and 1970s.

By Gloria Angelina Castillo, EGP Staff Writer

A longtime community activist was arrested recently after a search warrant turned up a firearm in his possession. He alleges the FBI is targeting him for political reasons and the search warrant was just an excuse to enter his home and take personal items.

At 5 a.m. on May 17, Los Angeles Sheriff’s deputies executed a search warrant at the Alhambra home of Carlos Montes, 63. He was arrested for being a convicted felon in possession of a gun, according to Steve Whitmore, a spokesman for the LA County Sheriff’s Department.

Montes says he is innocent and told EGP he had registered the World War II era gun with the Alhambra police department.

Montes claims his front door war destroyed and a SWAT squad ransacked his home taking numerous personal items and other mementos of his activism.

An FBI agent accompanied the SWAT squad and questioned him regarding his political activities, Montes said.

Activist Carlos Montes, center, joined supporters who accused the FBI of targeting peace activists like they did during the 1960s and 1970s. (EGP photo by Gloria Angelina Castillo)

“This is political persecution taking place. The fact that the FBI was there with the County Sheriffs’ SWAT squad on a minor violation of the penal code, where they tore down the door and ransacked my house, took my computer, took my computer files, took my cell phone. They looked at my family albums from the movement, from the Chicano Moratorium, the Community Service Organization, May 1st Southern California Immigration Coalition. It’s political persecution,” Montes told EGP on May 20.

Montes declined to comment on his prior conviction, but during an interview with Telemundo’s Rubén Luengas he said the conviction was related to a 1979 student rally at East Los Angeles College after which he was charged for assaulting an officer.

READ THIS STORY IN SPANISH: Activista Chicano Denuncia la Ejecución de una Orden Judicial y su Arresto

Numerous organizations gathered in front of the Los Angeles Federal Building on May 20 to show solidarity and support for Montes. Other longtime activists vouched for Montes’ good character.

Rudy Pisani, a drafted Korean War veteran, said Montes is an honest man and the whole incident is a frame up.

“He is a very patriotic Chicano. What they are doing is an embarrassment. It is a crime, not just against him, but also against the entire community. It is a crime against the progressive community because we stand for justice for peace, we are against the war and against immigration raids,” he said.

Erick Gardner, a young activist and writer for Fight Back News!, said citizens like Montes are being targeted throughout the country.

“Carlos has now been swept up in an attack that includes 23 other people in Minneapolis, Chicago and they might extend further,” Gardner said. He asked Montes’ supporters to sign a “pledge of resistance” and to join an Emergency Response Network.

Ron Gochez, of the Southern California Immigration Coalition (SCIC), said the raid of Montes’ home and his interrogation was an effort to intimidate him and others.

“I just wonder if the FBI goes and kicks down the door of the executive directors of some of these non-profit organizations. They don’t go and kick down the bed of some of these folks who are in bed with the Democratic Party,” said Gochez. “… They know that Carlos Montes represents a threat to the system, and that’s why all of us are here to back him up.”

The FBI would not comment and referred all media questions to the LA County Sheriff’s Dept. “The arrest and search warrants were filed with the state, not federally, so I’ll defer to LASD for any comment,” Laura Eimiller, FBI Press Relations, told EGP in an email.

Montes has for years been vocal on a gamut of national and local issues, including the Chicano Movement, anti-war and anti-police brutality activities, pro immigration reform efforts, and solidarity with activists in Columbia who have denounced human rights violations and the killing of peace activists. Most recently, Montes helped lead protests denouncing the LAPD’s role in the death of Manuel Jamines in the MacArthur Park area, and in support of UTLA teacher proposals for school reform in East LA.

His supporters are demanding the charges against him be dropped. They plan to protest out side the Alhambra Court House on June 16 when he has his first court appearance, according to the recently formed Los Angeles Committee to Stop FBI Repression.