Callous, crappy and cruel society we live in…..

October 5, 2011

 

The attacks on benefit claimants is unrelenting. Sound bites, spin and lies (“Something for nothing” culture etc.) and the ConDems want to make things a helluva more difficult. Labour, unfortunately, is mimicking the behaviour along with pitting one oppressed group against another. What’s even more disgraceful is that this increased onslaught is at a time of economic crisis, recession and unemployment. Solution? Up the ante against the poor, attack benefits and cut services.

What has also made me think other than wondering where these mythical jobs are is how employment can have a detrimental impact on people. ConDems and Labour think the unemployed and disabled people aren’t trying hard enough to find work. Bring in an oppressive private company such as Atos Origin whose job is more about right-wing ideology as opposed to objective medical evidence therefore creating more stress, anxiety and desperation, pushing people into an ever shrinking job market where preciously good jobs are hard to come by. Though the ConDems and Labour don’t think people should be so choosy and selective and moralised into going for any old shitty job. And various private companies brought in with public money chucked at them will keep a collective beady eye on the unemployed where they can “park” and “cream” at leisure and where people can work for their dole which inevitably will push pay and  conditions down. Why would an employer give a qualified person decent pay when they could get the same qualified person for free? This is a trade union issue yet trade unions are undeniably quiet……

The benefits system is based on fear, sanctions and conditionality. Disabled people are exposed as being liars and majority fit for work based on an assessment which is more about ideology and less about medical evidence. And unemployed people are not doing enough to find work. Both groups are seen as “scroungers” and “workshy” and not really disabled. This constant message eventually seeps through and impacts on attitudes. Disabled people feel vulnerable and powerless and constantly exposed.

On the issue of disability, what the ConDems and Labour miss out is the attitudes of employers. There is so much anecdotal evidence that employers can be very ignorant, misguided, unfair and discriminatory in their treatment of disabled workers. Lack of education and the legislation that supports disabled people just isn’t tough enough. Instead of damning disabled people what about employers and their discriminatory attitudes?

The Office for Disability Issues published ‘Public perceptions of disabled people’ looking at attitudes towards disabled people as revealed in the 2009 British Social Attitudes Survey (BSAS). It measures how much prejudice there is in Great Britain towards disabled people and examines how attitudes have changed between 2005 and 2009. Unfortunately, it made for some disturbing reading.  The research showed that even though attitudes toward disabled people have improved on the whole, prejudice is still a worrying issue especially towards people with learning disabilities or mental health problems.

The report suggests that people are more comfortable interacting with people with physical or sensory impairments in social situations than they are interacting with individuals with learning disabilities or mental health conditions, many also struggle in situations where disabled people are in positions of authority. This may reflect a false belief that a disabled boss will be less effective than a non-disabled boss.

It is very worrying that stigma and discrimination remain so strong. Such prejudice is one of the biggest barriers to employment for people with a learning disability or mental health problems. Employers are often reluctant to take on someone with a learning disability or a mental health problem, possibly because they do not know enough about the benefits of employing them or they do not know how to get the right support to make it work. 

And with this constant and unrelenting lies spouted by politicians and screaming headlines about “benefit scroungers” will only increase oppressive attitudes towards  people. How many people have suffered burn-out in their job, harassment, bullying and discrimination? This will have an impact on their own attitudes about getting another job? My own experiences of the workforce has been negative, some workplaces better in understanding mental distress than others. I have to say this as given me a rather cynical outlook on work along with a feeling of nervousness. It really doesn’t inspire me to want to leap back into the job market as there’s only so much harassment, bullying and discrimination you can take. Also, it doesn’t have to be explicit in its nature. What about needs of disabled people such as adjustments, flexible hours and so on?

Over a third (37 per cent) of those who were disabled while in paid work said that they had to leave work for reasons connected to their impairment. Just under three in ten (27 per cent) of those who had ever left a job for reasons connected with their impairment felt that they could have remained in that job if some support, adjustments or adaptations had been made. Most of the adjustments that respondents would have wanted related to support and understanding from managers (14 per cent) and colleagues (eight per cent), but few (eight per cent) of these respondents were offered any support or adjustments/ adaptations.

Even when I psyche myself up to apply for jobs I always have in the back of my mind what is the attitude of mental distress (in my own case). One recent application form asked how many days had off sick in the past 2 years. Interesting that this was asked and it was very naughty indeed to ask this. Why did they need the info at this stage? Was it to be used to filter out people? Naughty and very unfair. The organisation that asked that particular question wasn’t some non-unionised private company but an organisation which champions the rights of people with mental distress…. Ironic or what! I wasn’t sure whether to laugh or cry.

Then if you are successful with the job you have the dreaded occupational form which can stop the progression of your potential employment dead in the tracks. Do you tell them about your sick record? Disability? Hauled in front of an occupation doctor or nurse who asks for personal details, again is this about supporting you or hindering you? Along with the lack of awareness, understanding and insight combined with the misfortune if you end up in a workplace where discrimination and bad behaviour is inherent. Oh, and that reminds me, I truly wish there were enlightened trade union reps when it comes to discrimination and disability. Education and training wouldn’t go amiss!

We live in a society that treat people as cogs in a capitalist wheel where we are undervalued. When you can’t work, for whatever reasons, you are given a meagre amount of money to exist along with going through humiliating, distressing fake assessments or you’re constantly scrutinize to make sure you are chasing one shitty job after another without any consideration about what you want or need. Nothing is on your terms and this creates a sense of powerlessness and stigmatisation and vilification from lazy right-wing politicians and media outlets. It’s about punishment and coercion; your fault your disabled, your fault you are unemployed. Never about building awareness, insight through education. Where people are treated with respect and being allowed to choose when they want to work (if they want to) on their own terms. Where decent paid jobs exist along with prospects and support. But punishment, coercion and condemnation is the name of the game in this callous and cruel society.

See as well: Public Perceptions of Disabled People - Evidence from the British Social Attitudes Survey 2009


Blaming the poor….again!

October 2, 2011

 

 

 

 

This report sets out a stronger system of conditionality – the requirements that benefit claimants need to fulfil in return for benefit – that will ensure that all claimants are doing everything they can to find work.

With unemployment rising and the economic outlook is gloomy and grim along with predictions of a double-dip what do the Tories come up with but to increase conditionality for receiving benefits. How much tougher before it becomes impossible to apply at all???? Have a read of the right-wing fink tank, The Policy Exchange, and their pearls of wisdom at increasing conditionality (For those currently spending as little as eight minutes a day looking for work, conditions will significantly increase). And now, unsurprisingly, David Cameron spouted this poison:

It wasn’t enough to end the poisonous something-for-nothing system we had under Labour. Given the scale of the problem, can’t we go further? Say by asking much more of people on benefits who should be looking for work – or imposing even stricter penalties on those who refuse job offers?

There’s always this obsession with ‘something for nothing’ system and not just from the Tories as Ed Miliband made a similar outburst in his speech about how easy it is to receive benefits. He’s quite content to mimic the ConDems. Both parties are ideologically piited in attacking the most powerless in society by engaging in divide and rule. We may be all in this together but Osborne, Cameron and Miliband with prefer to chuck benefit claimants out of the life boat and into the sea to flounder and sink.

What’s even more obscene while these leaders condemn lazy benefit scroungers jobs are ever shrinking and disappearing. Looking for work can be disenchanting and demoralising as good jobs are hard to come by yet Cameron/Osborne and Miliband don’t care about that as they are entirely happy with claimants to do any old shitty job with no development nor prospects. And any old shitty job includes working for your dole as part of the various workfare schemes. If people, apparently, spend 8 minutes looking for work it is possibly to do with the fact there’s nothing of significance out there.

But Cameron/Miliband believe the unemployed shouldn’t have high expectations nor be able to choose what job they go for but because they get money from the state they should be expected to go for any old shitty job. It also costs money to look for jobs. If the ConDems are so keen to help unemployed people then will they give them free broadband to seek jobs out on the internet? Nah, somehow I doubt it as bashing the poor is much more fun then looking for pragmatic and helpful solutions.

30-40 years ago it would have been odd to attack people on the dole but the ideology has shifted and now it’s about wholesale attacks on the welfare state and the benefits system. I know who the enemies are and it’s not just the ConDems but Miliband too as in his speech he declared class war on the poor.


Atos kills!!

September 30, 2011

“The first duty of all doctors is to make the care of your patient your first concern”… Jane O’Brien, Assistant Director, Standards & Fitness to Practice Directorate GMC.

I attended the protest outside the Business Design Centre in Islington today as the BMJ (British Medical Journal) Recruitment Fair has allowed Atos in who will be attempting to recruit yet more ‘disability assessors’. There were cops about penning us in as we were on private property and they wanted us to move across directly into the heat of the sun … activists said NO.. And the cops didn’t push it. There were speakers and there was an excellent presence along with the media interest.

A recent study by Mind found that 3-quarters of people surveyed said that the prospect of a work capability assessment had made their mental health worse and 51% said it had left them with suicidal thoughts. Atos assessments are trials by computer. They ignore medical evidence. Over 40% of people who have appealed Atos Origin’s decision have been successful. Surely, then, Atos is NOT fit for purpose. They have no concern nor consideration for the people they are assessing rather for them it is ideological and profit making. Nothing about people need more about greed. Public money have been pumped into a private company like Atos and for what? To create more misery and desperation.

See: Open Letter on Atos ‘Healthcare’ to the BMJ and RCN

Extracts from the letter:

Doctors’ and nurses’ ethics are being corrupted by Atos’ offers of higher salaries and daytime reduced work hours. Some doctors have tried to argue that their duty to patients does not apply when assessing benefit claimants on behalf of Atos. But the General Medical Council has upheld that doctors are always bound by this duty whether seeing patients, employees (when assessing occupational health), benefit and insurance claimants, athletes, among others (see attached response from the Standards & Fitness to Practise Directorate).

And

Atos kills. Medical professionals who lend it credibility give it a licence to kill. We call on the BMJ Group and RCN to end all association with Atos, and on doctors and nurses to defend patients and uphold our welfare.

The authors have received a reply from the BMJ but it is not on the net as far as I am aware. Photocopies of the reply were handed out to campaigners. BMJ say:

There is also a presumption that recruiters are clear about the nature of the work and will do nothing to jeopardise doctors’ GMC standing. Your letter challenges that point and I will now ask ATOS for an assurance that their employees’ duties are congruent with the GMC’s Good Medical Practice. When I hear back from them, I and my colleagues on the BMJ board will consider what if anything needs to be done and we will let you know the outcome.

Seems like pressure needs to be put on the BMJ Group and that Atos isn’t based on duty of care they are based on profit and greed.

On 19th October, from 1pm at the Business Design Centre, it’s the annual Welfare to Work convention ….!! Conference speakers include James Purnell and Lord Freud. If you believe working for your dole is wrong, wrong and WRONG then get yourself down there on the 19th October and tell them where they shove workfare!


More dishonesty and damned deceit from Mister Ed

September 29, 2011

Ed Miliband obviously didn’t pick up a copy of Mind’s Daily Stigma as if he had he would have been aware of the self-perpetuating lies he was spouting at the Q and A session yesterday again about that man he met on benefits:

“He was somebody who had lost his job 10 years ago. I’m not questioning the fact that he genuinely had an ailment … but I just say to you, the system didn’t demand that he go back to work, the system wrote him off.

“The system said he had incapacity, he couldn’t work for a bit and that’s it.

“The problem is I met his next-door neighbours … and they didn’t actually refer to him, but they said: ‘Our problem is we are working incredibly hard and we are worried we are paying for people who can’t work. “

Now this poor ‘man in the constituency’ is being quoted again. I do wonder if he actually exists or indeed whether Ed has just spoken to one constituency member?

Mister Ed just lazily and offensively reiterates lies along with a good measure of presumptions neither based on the actual facts possibly just on a quick conversation. And Mister Ed shows he isn’t interested in finding out the facts rather judgmental comments are the fashion. Questions I would put to Ed on this subject?

  1. Does Ed M. know what happened in the doctor’s surgery?
  2. Discussions with the man’s doctor along with diagnosis, treatment and what a fully qualified clinician with all the facts would decide based on a medical judgement?
  3. How does he know the neighbours were talking about this man as they didn’t actually refer to him?
  4. Has Ed M. actually spoken to benefit claimants and doctors?
  5. Or… is making wild assumptions based on right-wing populism that create more stigma and misery much more fun?
  6. Does Ed M. like kicking the poor?
  7. Does Ed M. actually look at statistics about benefits such as underpayments and benefits not claimed?
  8. Does he know or even care that 0.5% of money is lost to false claims?
  9. And that more is lost to tax evasion and avoidance i.e. rich people fiddling their taxes?
  10. The very capitalists and business people Mister Ed is cool with…..?
Ed M even had the cheek to say, that he should have said in his keynote speech “you’ve got to defend people who are with disability, ill-health and say that they shouldn’t be under attack”. But chose not to, obviously.
What Ed M. did yesterday was to continually to vilify and stigmatise a group of already punished and kicked to the ground people. Benefits are an arduous task to apply for riddled with bureaucracy, and red tape. The system isn’t geared towards engendering a feeling of support and help instead obstacles are put in your way with the hope, no doubt, that it will put you off. And when you do dodge the obstacles, confront the hurdles and symbolically leap through the hoops you end up with a meagre sum that is barely enough to exist on yet the right-wing do like to lie about claimants living it up…
And lies stick….along with a leader of the opposition spreading more lies, deceit and hatred. But the likes of Ed M. won’t be ashamed of what he’s peddling as it’s classic divide and rule. Kicking the poor has always been a favourite sport of New Labour.
Awful proposals from “an influential adviser to Ed Miliband”… Maurice Glasman on benefits.

Wanderings around Covent Garden

September 28, 2011

Covent Garden this morning I heard this opera singer her breathtaking beautiful voice echoing around the market space. Enchanting experience. I dislike Covent Garden, well, maybe dislike is too strong but I always find it claustrophobic due to the unrelenting busyness of the whole place. Today it was quiet and even more stunning to hear this passionate sweet sounding voice. Didn’t have my camera unfortunately… so used my mobile.


The future is blue. The future is Glasman

September 27, 2011

While the economy is slashed and burned, while unemployment rises, recession, double-dip style on the way, public sector and welfare state being plundered by the private sector and workers being shafted…. we have an opposition (if you can call it that) in denial not really fiddling while society burns but more about looking at the latest colour charts. I don’t know why Labour doesn’t just merge with the ConDems because Balls, for example, wouldn’t really be doing anything different austerity cuts wise. Red(ish) is the new blue. Maybe the party should rename itself the United Colours of Labour. The visual background to Labour Party conference is pale blue joining up with the colours of the Union Jack. The future is flag, family and faith.

And leader Ed all smiling smug, sneering with contempt at the working class. Grinning and sermonising in that patronising Mister Ed manner, the classic divide and rule where “hard working families” are pitted against those on benefits, they who deserve social housing while the unemployed can sod off. People have been chucked onto the unemployed scrap heap due to this economic crisis yet nothing from Mister Ed about lack of jobs and lack of housing. Under the ConDems things will get worse but don’t expect Mister Ed and his front bench cronies from championing the very people who are Labour’s core voters. You can rely on Labour not to defend the class interests of the working class. Dissecting “determined” Mister Ed’s speech was one depressing experience. Too many NL-style words (“Ambition”…”Responsibilities”…”Values”)… and the weirdly …predators versus producers (I thought it was Alien versus Predators but am willing to be contradicted). All meaningless vacuous nonsense.

“A generation ago a Labour leader came to Conference to condemn the behaviour of a Labour Council in Liverpool”.

Why did Mister Ed bring that up? Remembering the bad old sad old days of the witch-hunting days of Kinnock/Hattersley?

Thatcherite

“Not just for a year or so but for decades. Now there are hard lessons here for my party which some won’t like. Some of what happened in the 1980s was right”…..”It was right to let people buy their council houses. …….And it was right to change the rules on the closed shop, on strikes before ballots. These changes were right, and we were wrong to oppose it at the time”.

“Where benefits are too easy to come by for those who don’t deserve them and too low for those who do”.

Does Mister Ed actually talk to real people? “Earth to Mister Ed, come in Mister Ed”… Does Mister Ed actually live on Planet Earth or it is Planet Ed? When questioned by Andrew Marr months ago he was clueless on the benefits system and again the above quote just shows how wrong, offensive and clueless he is. Shafting the poor at the expense of this tough on scroungers. No mention of how many benefits go unclaimed? Benefits underpayed and so on. Does Mister Ed really truly believe that benefits are easy to claim? The quote also exposes another nasty divide and rule tactic based on assumption and lies, a Daily Mail favourite. You sometimes hear about the mythical person down the mythical road who gets all the benefits going, it’s all hearsay, rumour and assumption but to your average right-wing populist journo and politician it’s the honest truth even though it’s unverifiable. And lies stick.

People experience humiliation, hurdles, bureaucracy and red tape when they apply for benefits to believe otherwise is utterly dishonest. And that’s what Mister Ed is doing creating lies. Instead of capitulating to the right-wing consensus and pro-establishment line Mister Ed should step back and think about benefits and the amount paid. It’s barely enough for people to exist let alone live and I bet Mister Ed wants to make it harder.

I remember arguing not so long back the importance of being in the Labour Party but can’t quite believe those words I wrote any more. Listening to Mister Ed, sneering with contempt at the working class in background of images of the red, white and blue, pale blue rose and the Party of business and capitalism worries me. Flag waving = jingoism and imperialism. All this flag, family and faith makes me think of Kinder, Küche, Kirche. I know arguments about staying in the LP is that we have to stick together to organise a fight back against the leadership, to push for alternatives and to establish a coherent Left within Labour. Yes, I am sure Mister Ed would be quite grateful if myself and partner stopped our Direct Debit to the LP. My partner, who works in welfare benefits, is angry at Mister Ed’s remarks as he sees the realities of desperate people trying to eke a living on meagre benefits. Lies, damn lies, Mister Ed.

So, I know the arguments, hell I have even written similar ones. But there’s a time when enough is enough. I am still mulling this over but to witness a sneery contemptible anti-trade union leader like Ed Miliband is just too much. Yes, it does look appealing stay and fight by proclaiming not in my name echoing the same words once thrown at a “great man” (in Mister Ed’s terms) during a barbaric, imperialist and unjust war. Sometimes you just have to say enough’s enough and cut up your membership card as you can’t symbolically rip it up like you could in the old days (and in them days you had the red flag and Clause IV). The economy is sinking and we have an opposition more interested in punishing the already punished along with saying they don’t like austerity cuts but they wouldn’t do much different. No alternatives. No solid opposition. No support for workers’ fighting back. Instead Labour is based on colour schemes and out doing the Tories on how blue they are. The future is blue…the future is Glasman.

See as well LabourList and desperate soft lefts eager to see some good in Ed’s speech. Wake up and smell the sell-out!                         And what’s this from Seumas Milne… I mean WTF! Mister Ed hasn’t broken with any consensus line.

And just what is Len McCluskey on about: “We will have to see a lot more detail, but we have seen a man on a mission. There is definitely a phoenix rising from the ashes, into a people’s party.”

Er, Len, maybe it passed you by but Mister Ed doesn’t particularly like workers’ fighting back … by striking…!! He also endorsed Thatcherite anti-trade union laws. He’s know friend of rank and file trade unionists, he won’t support strike action and he won’t be on a picket line so what’s this nonsense from Len M. about Mister Ed’s “people’s party”… Maybe I do live on an alternate universe who heard a totally different speech but the leader of the opposition (I have to stop laughing when I write that) spoke about being “pro-business” no explicit support for workers…some vague rubbish about workers and their labour but with Mister Ed…he just can’t break with the right-wing consensus and pro-establishment line.


Here’s to you Annie Nightingale

September 26, 2011

Sunday evenings would be about listening to the Top 40, that great music institution, then, sitting in this draughty kitchen, after the Number 1 was played waiting in anticipation for Annie Nightingale’s request show. I was an avid fan from 1982 to 1986. She introduced me to music I hadn’t heard of, she helped to evolve my music tastes. Annie N. now the grand dame of music. I watched a programme on her life as a DJ on BBC4 this weekend. She still champions music, hasn’t compromised her position and likes what she plays. Radio 1, when I was a kid, was all Simon Bates, Dave Lee Travis and Noel Edmonds, the later spot-on parody being “Smashy and Nicey” . When I got older I was sick of those cheesy and dull radio shows. Then at the age of 12 I discovered the marvellous and fascinating Annie Nightingale…the first woman DJ! As she said on the BBC4 programme they only got her as they needed a woman! She spoke about the sexism endemic in the corridors of the white male dominated BBC and also in the counter-culture of pirate radio.

In a world dominated by X-Factor and Hallmark lyrics (great and apt description delivered by Annie N.) everything about what can be commodified and packaged. Music being about something stage-managed and artificially created by Dr Frankenstein aka Simon Cowell with his monster being X-Factor. Waiting for the new Big Star. Thank goodness for Annie Nightingale still striving to champion music, real hand-made DIY music not manufactured pap.

When I listened to her back in the early 1980s I discovered Echo and the Bunnymen (she played The Cutter and I was simply entranced), The Cure, The The, Joy Division, The Associates, The Smiths, Everything But the Girl, Soft Cell and so on. It was an endless fascinating introduction of non-mainstream music, though she did play mainstream music she also played stuff which didn’t get that mainstream airing. Much of it was primarily indie music. I think she (along with John Peel that other innovative) was the first to play The Smiths. Remember her playing Relax by FGTH before  Trevor Horn’s involvement. All I can say, it was better with Horn’s involvement.

I stopped listening to her show when I was 16 mainly because I had left school and other things beckoned. Music for me at that time had become so big-hair and shoulder-pads rock ballad warblings. By the late 1980s on the cusp of the 1990s music, for me, became something I could listen to. Welcome to acid house, Madchester and to the 1990s. Happy Mondays, Stone Roses,Charlatans, SoHo, Primal Scream. And Annie Nightingale was championing and playing their music.

Annie Nightingale has been a DJ for 4 decades and playing what she likes, nothing pre-packaged just music. She has the ears for a damn good tune. She was spot-on about pretentious prog-rock her love of punk helped her to take over from Bob “whispering” Harris on The Old Grey Whistle Test. Along the way she showed her interest in Kraftwerk, synth music that was creative in itself that paved the way for the early 1980s synth music from Human League to OMD. New Wave and New Romantics would feature on the request show. She still is inspiring and exciting a new generation about music. Annie Nightingale was/is a maverick and never has allowed herself to sell out. She certainly helped define my tastes in music and certainly gave Sunday evenings a revolutionary meaning.

Here’s to you Annie Nightingale, the first, finest and best woman DJ of BBC Radio 1.


In community conversation with Southwark Council

September 24, 2011

Along with Kate Belgrave I took myself off for a community tête-à-tête with council leaders in Southwark.

Peter John, the Leader of the council will lead a series of community conversations to understand what happened during the disorder and to see what everyone in the community can learn, so that we try everything to avoid a repeat.

As a council, we are determined to build a fairer future for all. But the whole community needs to ask some tough questions about why the looting and disorder occurred on August 8.

I filled out a questionnaire, answering questions about community and riots, such as what caused them and what I can do for the community etc. Then afterwards I had a chat with Cllr Veronica Ward about the aftermath of the riots and evictions. She spoke about tenancy agreements/booklet explaining that if convicted of an offence in relation to the riots then their tenancy is in jeopardy.

She came across as defensive and uncomfortable being asked questions about potential evictions. I asked her how many people could be up for eviction and that I had read 35? She couldn’t give me a straight answer rather she kept saying that they would look at individual cases, she didn’t like being put on the spot. What confuses me is if a family member is found guilty of a riot related incident how can they evict the individual, won’t that break ties? Ward wasn’t really listening and kept agreeing absent-mindedly and again reiterated that all cases would be looked at individually. I mentioned Wandsworth Council whether they had been influenced by them but she dismissed that suggestion.

I am also mentioned that MPs don’t give very good examples when it comes to their expenses, again she agreed but I really couldn’t get a straight answer. Very slippery discussion and yes, she’s a politician.

If people are punished for things then it is the criminal courts that should decide on the punishment. Going to prison is miserable enough. The reason some people keep going back is because they are badly damaged. The riots were not an excuse for weak politicians to posture as tough guys and as we have seen it’s all about knee jerk reactions along with right-wing populism.

See Kate’s post here


No to evictions!

September 22, 2011

 

I attended the lobby of Wandsworth Council yesterday. The council was discussing a “new mandatory power of possession for anti-social behaviour”

The council said they will continue to evict council house tennants who are involved in anti social behaviour, including families accussed of looting during the riots.

Council leader Ravi Govindia said: “We took the action that was required of us and for that I have no shame.”

Well, they should feel shame as a family is up for eviction as a family member has been accused of taking part in the riots from last month. His court case is coming up in early October. The fact the council sees fit to carry out this draconian act is bad enough but moreover the person accused has not been found guilty of any offence.  This isn’t justice this is a witch-hunt.

What is even more galling is many Labour MPs are all behind this “tough on riots” stance and uttering words like “criminality” yet how many of them flipped their houses? How many claimed fancy luxuries as expenses?

What is the difference between someone walking off with a Plasma telly from a looted shop and an MP who thinks it OK to claim for their £850 television set from Selfridges as expenses? Who are the real criminals?

The aftermath of the riots isn’t about looking at the underlying issues what caused them but about medieval style retribution and witch-hunting. We need to organise and fight against these proposed evictions.

As John Clossick, from Wandsworth Against Cuts said: “This council have said they are going to evict them. The problem is that it is Cameron’s flagship council, and they could introduce it elsewhere.”

Indeed see Southwark Council…35 tenants sent eviction warning letters.

See Wandsworth Against Cuts


The man doth protest too much

September 19, 2011

I read Tom Martin’s oppressed man shtick in the Guardian last week and was amazed that the Grauniad published this piece of a personalised sulky yet thoroughly nasty outburst. At least brush up the style, content and arguments. I didn’t really give it much thought as it came across as some sullen and dour sexist bloke throwing his toys out of the pram. But there’s more to Tom Martin, read Cath’s blog who had done research on him and Missing Minister (and now he’s commenting on her blog) along with the F Word.

The other thing that crossed my mind reading Martin’s piece was that his outburst on “gender bias and the LSE” was just a cover to spout his misogynistic bile.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers