Are ‘Celtic Fringe’ Conservatives About to Declare UDI?

DAVOS/SWITZERLAND, 29JAN10 - David Cameron, Le...

Is David Cameron prepared to see the creation of 'sister parties' in the devolved regions? Image via Wikipedia

The BBC is, today, running an article that suggests that the frontrunner to lead the Scottish Conservatives wants the Scottish Party to distance itself from the Party in London.  In effect, Murdo Fraser wants the Scottish Conservatives to be more, um, Scottish.  There is an inherent logic to this as Westminster is, increasingly, the parliament of England – and more powers are being devolved to the regional parliaments.  Fraser’s ambition, apparently, is to create a Scottish right-of-centre party in Scotland, freed of London-centric coalition baggage.

I gather that similar moves are afoot to create a Northern Ireland centre-right party out of the ruins of the near-dead Ulster Unionist Party and the Conservatives in Northern Ireland.  Rumour has it that several prominent Ulster Unionists are planning to defect to the Conservatives in the next couple of weeks.  And, in an act of meeting them halfway, the Conservative leadership here wants to create a new NI-focused centre-right, and non-sectarian brand – much more distant from the London Party.

To an extent this seems logical.  Some in the UUP genuinely want to distance themselves from the sectarian baggage the party brings to electorate – but don’t want to join a Conservative Party that has no, local, electoral prospects.  Many local Conservatives have also come to the realisation that in the context of devolution there has to be an element of Realpolitik at the core of their single-nation idealism.

If the result is that a genuine non-sectarian, centre-right party is created here, I’m all for it.  I’d just have concerns that the new party – whatever it’s called, will have the necessary leadership charisma to make it an electoral success.

Apologies…

Signing of the Joint Agreement between Scotlan...

Nationalists Together...

For the faithful few who visit this blog so regularly – even when I’m not writing anything – many thanks. I appreciate your loyalty, your patience, and your provocative comments. I must apologise for not having posted for so long. This has been a function of 1) a pretty dead political period 2) a need for me to escape Northern Ireland and drink lots of great wine in the middle of rural France and 3) making a living.

However, because of item 2 I am reinvigorated and have been inspired by some great holiday reading. I’m now ready to re-enter the political blogging foray.

Now I must say that I’ve been somewhat out of the loop and have only been able to watch the BBC’s satellite news output which was 90% dominated by the News International phone tapping issue. Obviously I have been gripped in the hope that some tantalising nuggets may leak out about NI politicians whose phone messages may have been intercepted (especially the phones of those politicians who may have successfully obtained super injunctions). Alas, I have been disappointed. In that respect even the Commons select committee grilling of Murdoch & Son was a damp squib. I live in hope.

On my return from rural France I noticed the number of Scottish flags. Perhaps this has been a well-trodden path by other commentators. But I must say it does seem a tad ironic that our local “loyalists” are so fond of fluttering such a potent symbol of Scottish nationalism so soon after the Scottish Parliament elections when the Scots Nats won such a handsome majority against all the odds.

But it’s a very neat, fluttering, exemplar of how Unionism has become little Ulster Nationalism.  Alex Salmond should be proud.

Government proposals actually increase proportion of unelected, C of E Bishops in Lords

View of the House of Lords Chamber in the Pala...

Image via Wikipedia

The Government’s proposal to retain 12 reserved seats for Church of England Bishops would actually mean an increase proportionately of the presence of Bishops in the House of Lords. Keeping any reserved seats for the Bishops would be an affront to democracy and antithetical to the aims of a fairer and more egalitarian parliament, the British Humanist Association (BHA) has claimed.

The Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg set out the Government’s plans in a statement to the House of Commons from 15.30 on Tuesday 17 May. The Government’s proposals include a significant reduction in membership of the chamber, from nearly 800 at present to 300, and between 80-100% elected and the remaining appointed. At present, 26 Bishops of the Church of England are entitled to sit in the House of Lords as of right; the only such example of clergy holding automatic membership of a legislature in a modern democracy.

At present, Bishops make up 3% of the House of Lords. Under the Government’s proposals that would increase to 4%. Reducing the number of reserved seats for Bishops from 26 to 12 would actually increase their presence proportionately in the chamber.

BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson has commented as follows (and I wholeheartedly agree):

‘The presence of unelected prelates is an anomaly within our system of government, and their retention, even in diminished numbers, would be an indefensible affront to democratic principles. In no other legislative chamber are elected or appointed representatives deemed so insufficiently qualified to deal with matters of belief and morality that they require supplementing by clergy.  Retaining the Lords Spiritual and actually increasing their presence proportionately is completely at odds with the aspiration of a more legitimate and representative second chamber.’

A 2010 ICM poll found that 74% of people think it is ‘wrong’ for Bishops to be given an automatic seat in the Lords, and that 48% said that it was not important for Church of England Bishops to have a role in the Lords. The poll questioned over 1,000 people from different backgrounds.

I take it back…a return to grumpiness

I’ve changed my mind. Nelson McCausland has just been re-elected.  No doubt he’ll be offered a ministerial position despite being Chief of a lost tribe of Israel and being convinced that some big bearded bloke made the world (and Ulster with it) 6,000 years ago – long after the formation of the Giant’s Causeway.

Oh and the turnout is just half the electorate.  Same-old, same-old white-knuckled (mostly elderly) voters electing the same-old, same-old dead-wood (sans a few UUP crazies).

Jeez this place is depressing.

I have returned to grumpiness.

Who will “Do an SNP” in Northern Ireland?

Northern Ireland First Minister Peter Robinson...

Robinson needs to start cleansing his party of flat-earth nutters if he is to "do an SNP" Image via Wikipedia

I’m remarkably up-beat this morning. I have cast aside my normal grumpiness.  While the Northern Ireland election count has been a spectacular mess – the fact that we still have hordes of minor civil servants counting little slips of paper days after the vote is stupefying – the emerging result is good.

Let me explain.

There are a few interesting developments.  Let’s skip over all the constitutional garbage. All the parties are now Little Ulster parties. Even I am beginning to give up on any romantic notions I ever had that Northern Ireland could be ‘integrated’ and treated like, erm, Finchley.

That would be depressing but for a few developments. The first is that the UUP is pretty much dead. The Alliance Party is now a more important party and a vast swathe of middle-class voters is defecting from the UUP to Alliance. Alliance has become the middle class Unionist party (that doesn’t call itself Unionist and whose voter base is not exclusively Protestant). And it’s even beginning to behave a bit more like a sensible, thinking Party. David Forde was the only leader to face-up to the water charges issue and fess-up that he could countenance them (somebody has to pay for the investment needed).  Oh and it had by far the best election broadcast – all CGI – and Naomi Long’s narration was excellent.

Meanwhile, Peter Robinson made clear in the hustings that he wanted the ‘whole community’ to vote DUP. He was at pains to make clear that the constitutional issues were a done deal and that we needed to move on to more bread-and-butter (AKA secular) issues. Well said.  Pity though about all the new-earth creationist nutters in his Party and the fact that the majority of candidates are well-known bigots.

When I showed up at the polling station to cast my own vote (for Alliance by the way, reluctantly, given that Trevor Lunn was my only AP Assembly candidate) I was greeted by the usual horde of DUP leafleters and hangers-on – all of whom, I’m pretty sure, played flutes.

But all things considered things are looking better. The UUP is on the verge of being eradicated from the ballot paper (one less sectarian party to worry about). As I type there is a real prospect that Connal McDevitt may not be elected (one less hectoring know-all from the South to look at on television).  The Alliance Party has more popular support (meaning it will be forced to decide what it stands for in terms of real policy issues rather than merely be ‘nice’).  And the DUP needs to start thinking about how it cleanses itself of the rotten core of sectarianism at its heart in order to “do an SNP” and win an overall majority at Stormont.

Tantalisingly, there is a real prospect that the DUP – if it can, genuinely, cleanse itself of its sectarian baggage, might start eating into more of a cross-community voter base.  There is a prospect that we may see the emergence of two leading parties here in Northern Ireland that will vie for electoral dominance. I predict (and I appreciate that prediction is a mug’s game) that those two parties will be the DUP and Alliance.  Their challenge is to secure as large a swathe of the Sinn Fein vote as possible. Only Alliance and the DUP could achieve what the SNP has achieved in Scotland – because only they are unashamedly Northern Ireland grounded parties.

If either Party has such grand ambitions both need to start focusing on Sinn Fein’s achille’s heel: it’s crazy, confused, ultra-left-wing policies.

Sorry for lack of posts folks…

Rather busy work-wise.  No doubt will get more politically reinvigorated as the elections get a little closer.

Rev Dr Brian Crowe Perved on Office Junior

In the Rectory of the Bizarre Reverend

Image via Wikipedia

I’m not sure what to “perv on an office junior” means – although the Sunday Life, apparently, is telling us today.

The Reverend Doctor Brian Crowe sex scandal in laid bare (literally) in all its detail today.  This must surely be a sub-editor’s paradise story – a holier-than-thou pseudo-intellectual politico and ordained minister exposed as hypocrite and sex fiend.

Northern Ireland’s new normal political landscape is becoming littered with sex scandals.  Fundamental questions need to be asked about how sex and sexuality are removed from our public discourse.  Crowe and his UUP/DUP buddies have stifled debate about such issues as the extension of the Abortion Act to Northern Ireland or the disgraceful levels of teenage pregnancy here (in the context of poor provision of public information about contraception).

Meanwhile, here’s a quote from today’s Sunday Life…

Creepy Crowe, a Stormont special adviser, sent the lobbyist at the centre of the “sex for access” scandal a string of indecent photographs of himself — most of them too crude to publish in a pornographic magazine, never mind a family newspaper.

Our censored photographs are two of the less graphic images which disgraced Dr Crowe sent to the lobbyist who caught him boasting he could deliver political favours for sexual favours.

Corporation Tax and Growth

I’m delighted that the Treasury has now cleared the way for Northern Ireland to strike its own corporation tax rate. The announcement was made yesterday and today the Welsh are making noises that they want to be able to set their own corporation tax rate – even if it means a reduced block grant.

I don’t hold out too much hope that there is enough strategic vision in the ranks of the DUP/Sinn Fein Partnership Executive (mostly fiscal lefties) to guarantee a rate reduction any time soon. But at least the Treasury has offered the opportunity to the Executive.  We’ll see how long it takes for it to realise that it is an opportunity to be seized.

Corporation tax is one of the nastiest and most regressive taxes. It actively militates against investment and entrepreneurship.

As for the block grant I’d hope that the Executive actively considers axing pointless, costly and badly run quangos like the NI Consumer Council.  That will go some way, at least, towards covering the cost of the block grant reduction.

Sex, Hypocrisy, Christians and the UUP

Richard Dawkins at the 34th American Atheists ...

Dr Brian Crowe of the UUP didn't approve of my sharing a platform with Professor Richard Dawkins (pictured). Image via Wikipedia

I have to admit to being naturally drawn to stories about the Ulster Unionist Party making a public arse of itself.  But the (Rev) Brian Crowe story is almost too much.

I first met Dr/Rev Brian Crowe in the very earliest days of the “negotiations” between the UUP and the Conservative Party. In those days he was Head of Policy for the UUP. He claimed to be a policy wonk and talked a lot about the CDU in Germany.  We didn’t hit it off.  I don’t think he liked me.

But it was some time later that we “met” online.  I don’t spend a lot of time on Facebook – I rarely update my status. However, any time I visited it appeared that Brian Crowe was there. He reminded me of an Aunt of mine (dead now) who used to spend a lot of her time in Woodsides department store in Lisburn for no obvious reason.

But on one occasion (Dr/Rev) Brian and I got into an exchange. He took exception to the fact that I’d once shared a platform with Professor Richard Dawkins and he felt the need to put me right on my atheism.  The trail, I can’t find, but I believe his argument was that Atheists were hypocrites – we were little different to religious fundamentalists.

I pointed out, of course, that Atheists didn’t tell people how to live their lives or to lay down strict moral standards – it was all about reciprosity and ensuring we adhered to a common, decent humanity. But he took issue with this and argued that morality was why we needed Christianity. Christian morality, according to Dr Brian, was what made modern democracies.

I don’t claim to be the most moral person on the world but hopefully I have picked up a wee bit of morality without too much exposure to religion, or scriptures or moral hectoring – my upbringing helped. Perhaps Dr Brian was less lucky. But every time a hypocrite falls I do get some guilty pleasure.  Wrong I know. But enjoyable all the same.

Ambition, Identity and Competition: An Education Challenge

Picture of Harland & Wolff David and Goliath c...

Image via Wikipedia

I’ve had quite a flurry of correspondence since my post yesterday about Dawn Purvis’ report and working party looking at underachievement in working class Protestant areas of Belfast. Some people take exception to me supporting a selection based system (despite the fact that it produces the best GCSE and A Levels results in the UK and the highest level of social mobility in the UK).  Others believe that Comprehensive systems are more equitable (despite the fact that they produce the worst form of inequality – good schools only available to children of parents who can afford to pay the fees).

In my view the problems in working class areas of Northern Ireland in terms of educational under-achievement is explained, largely, by three things:

  • The failure of parents to instil educational ambition in their children (itself the result of lack of education) as evidenced by poor participation in post-primary selection tests
  • A parochial definition of identity and culture that is counter-intellectual (and sees education as a threat to identity)
  • A non-competitive attitude to education (a perception that an academic focused education is best left to the toffs)

In short, the problem of under-achievement by these working class communities is the fault of the communities themselves – not society’s fault or even the fault of politicians.  Moreover, Protestant/Loyalist tribal “culture” militates against modern-mindedness and free thought – important attributes, I’d suggest, in an increasingly global and interconnected society.

My challenge to Dawn Purvis and her working party is to create some structure, some body, some thing that seeks to reverse the lack of ambition, the parochial definition of identity and the non-competitive attitude to education. If such a body is put in place (and it doesn’t require the government or the Executive to put it in place) I may be even willing to lend a helping hand (if it’s wanted).

Next Page »


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 19 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 19 other followers