Nick Clegg to unveil 'riot payback scheme' as No 10 agrees to inquiry

Clegg to say people convicted of rioting crimes should have to 'look their victims in the eye', while No 10 plans a 'public engagement exercise' to establish causes of disturbances

  • guardian.co.uk,
  • Article history
Youths react during riots in Birmingham City Centre on 8 August
Youths react during riots in Birmingham City Centre on 8 August. The government is planning a ‘public engagement exercise’ to establish causes of disturbances. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

Nick Clegg is announcing separate plans for a "riot payback scheme", which would see people convicted of looting or violence in last week's disturbances being made to do community service or take part in restorative justice programmes in the areas where crimes were committed. He will say that people convicted of crimes last week should have to "look their victims in the eye".

Clegg could also give details of plans for a commission of inquiry into the causes of the riots after it emerged that No 10 has conceded to Labour demands for a formal commission to investigate the causes of last week's riots after behind-the-scenes cross-party talks co-ordinated by the Liberal Democrats.

The Ministry of Justice is to ask the probation service to instigate the schemes in the cities where the riots took place. Offenders would take part in activities to help repair the damage done or to face their victims and apologise under the restorative justice principle.

The deputy PM will tell a press conference in London: "I want offenders to be punished – and to change their ways. Victims of crime are only truly protected if punishment leads to criminals not committing crime again. Criminals must be punished and then made to change their ways.

"That's why those people who behaved so despicably last week should have to look their victims in the eye. They should have to see for themselves the consequences of their actions and they should be put to work cleaning up the damage and destruction they have caused so they don't do it again.

"We want people to be punished for their wrongdoing. We also want them to stop doing wrong. We want their future behaviour to change. We need punishment that sticks."

Clegg is said to be close to "brokering" a deal between the Conservatives and Labour into setting up a commission that would go into every neighbourhood affected by the disturbances to ask community members why the outbursts of violence occurred.

David Cameron had previously ruled out a full public inquiry in the short term, claiming that the parliamentary select committee inquiries were adequate but the government has now signalled its intention for a "public engagement exercise", with an independent chair, to establish the causes of the riots and looting.

A Downing Street source said: "We are coming to the view that there is a case for community engagement about what happened and why. It would involve getting someone to go into the communities and find out why this all happened. It would be likely that it would be chaired by someone outside government. We're coming to the view that some sort of engagement exercise would be useful."

The No10 source said it would not operate under the Inquiries Act and its precise nature had not been confirmed.

Labour sources confirmed they were in talks with ministers about the plans and a Liberal Democrat source said Clegg was "brokering" the deal on how the commission would be established. Clegg has been privately considering such an inquiry since last week and his party has already commissioned its own research into the problems.

On Monday Ed Miliband set out his demands for a commission of inquiry in a speech at Haverstock school, the comprehensive he attended in north London, which is situated close to some of the scenes of last week's violence.

He argued against an inquiry run by MPs, civil servants or the judiciary calling for the prime minister to "have the humility" to listen to the communities affected.

"You should have nothing to fear from the truth," he said. He added that if the government didn't move to establish such an inquiry, the Labour party would.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order (Total 188 comments)

  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • giselle97

    16 August 2011 8:32AM

    And I want an independent commission of inquiry in to the fact the politicians lie, cheat, steal from the taxpayer - and never, ever, ever get punished properly!

  • PeteLoud

    16 August 2011 8:32AM

    These riots started because the police operated a shoot-to-kill operation in which they killed Mark Duggan. People in the area were angered at this police killing and protested. That protest developed into the riots and looting. Although loooting became the big issue it was secondary.

    If the police had not opened fire and killed Duggan there would have been no riot, and no looting.

    Politicians and police disregard the facts and routinely lie about such incidents. This killing was compounded when the police IPCC lied about the incident, as the police lied about the Menendz killing and the killing of Tomlinson. This is so typical of our Sick Society.

    Politicians and police should not simply be considering riot control and jailing as many kids as possible, but they should be looking at the police shoot-to-kill strategy. Solve that problem and there next riot will be avoided, not need controlling.

    Let me say it again so there is no misunderstanding. This riot was directly caused by the police.

  • dvdvns

    16 August 2011 8:33AM

    First!(?)

    Will this be the same kind of listening excercise as the NHS? If the Gov dont know what's wrong this country, then what possible chance do we have of restoring some semblance of a civilised country?

  • Exmainer

    16 August 2011 8:33AM

    Ignore the problem. Just beat up the perpetrators and hope it will go away. Standard Tory thinking.

  • Koolio

    16 August 2011 8:33AM

    You get the feeling Clegg is like the summer intern who is instructed to go out and buy a pot of "elbow grease" or some other non-existent item just to get him out of the way.

  • Reflexive

    16 August 2011 8:35AM

    A Downing Street source said: "We are coming to the view that there is a case for community engagement about what happened and why."

    A true insight into how dumb this government is. Even the blindingly obvious takes time to slowly sink in.

  • RobCNW6

    16 August 2011 8:35AM

    This is exactly the kind of sensible, level headed policy making that you get as the result of coalition government, rather than the extremist, knee-jerk, soundbite, Murdoch led politics of the old, confrontational two party Lab-Con knockabout model.

    Go Clegg! Well done.

  • iamnotwise

    16 August 2011 8:35AM

    Will it work, who knows? They should be punished that is for sure.

    Any chance I could get to look a few high ranking bankers in the eye round my way? No, didn't think so.

  • indrossi

    16 August 2011 8:36AM

    Now I wanted to say something about the fact that we have lived over these last two or three summers with agony and we have seen our cities going up in flames. And I would be the first to say that I am still committed to militant, powerful, massive, non-violence as the most potent weapon in grappling with the problem from a direct action point of view. I’m absolutely convinced that a riot merely intensifies the fears of the white community while relieving the guilt. And I feel that we must always work with an effective, powerful weapon and method that brings about tangible results. But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the plight of the negro poor has worsened over the last twelve or fifteen years. It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity.

    Martin Luther King

  • alonsofan

    16 August 2011 8:36AM

    Can the bankers look at people in the eye and admit their crime and be made to repay their debts too?

  • dvdvns

    16 August 2011 8:37AM

    And I quote:

    "The deputy PM will tell a press conference in London: "I want offenders to be punished – and to change their ways"

    Why will they? What is going to motivate them to do that? The thought of more community work?

    Why is there a willingness to abandon the idea of cause and effect?

  • Tiresias

    16 August 2011 8:37AM

    @nemesis

    I suppose the bankers will be going to work and trying to repair some of the damage that they did, while paying quite a lot of tax (even if not as much as we might like).

  • whizgiggle

    16 August 2011 8:37AM

    PeteLoud

    Let me say it again so there is no misunderstanding. This riot was directly caused by the police.

    I agree (and that's not to excuse anything). I predict another one at the first attempt to evict a vaguely well liked family from a council estate. I'm sure the neighbours will be glad to be rid of some of the evictees, but the first popular family to be literally dragged from their home willl cause violence again. It's obvious.

  • nhsworker

    16 August 2011 8:38AM

    Is this "public engagement exercise" going to be similar to Lansley's listening exercise on the NHS? Will this listening exercise take place in front of some pretend graffiti in a youth cent

  • waitingmunchkin

    16 August 2011 8:39AM

    Can the bankers look at people in the eye and admit their crime and be made to repay their debts too?

    Alonsofan, I remember distinctly that they sat in front of a committee in the HoC and said that they were very sorry. Isn't that enough? What do you want ... blood?


    Hm.

    Actually ....

  • truthANDbeauty

    16 August 2011 8:39AM

    Nick Clegg says: "They should have to see for themselves the consequences of their actions and they should be put to work cleaning up the damage and destruction they have caused so they don't do it again."

    Sorry, Nick, but I can't see your empty, made-for-TV threats cutting any ice with the rioters and looters. Besides, if they were put in prison, where they should be, they are clearly not in a position to clean up the damage.

    Nick, as a politician you're a disaster. Leave these matters to the police and to the courts. You should spend your time doing something more suitable: like moving yourself back into the real world.

  • behemot

    16 August 2011 8:39AM

    Great, first you tell them they're scum and bad people and feckless etc. Then you ask them to engage. Now, why do I have the feeling this is not going to work? Great thinking, Cameron!
    If you want people to make a new start, don't reinforce the negative self-image!

  • jefferd

    16 August 2011 8:40AM

    alonsofan
    16 August 2011 8:36AM
    Can the bankers look at people in the eye and admit their crime and be made to repay their debts too?

    Would like to know what crimes bankers committed - they are also paying back any debts (note, not bail-outs) where they were given and paying vast amounts of tax and providing 000s of jobs.

    How are you contributing ?

  • happytolive

    16 August 2011 8:41AM

    He will say that people convicted of crimes last week should have to "look their victims in the eye".

    Clegg and Cameron: why don’t you guys go and meet the victims of your policies in the areas where the riots happened; look into their eyes and be ashamed of yourselves. If it is fair play so you must accept this.

  • behemot

    16 August 2011 8:41AM

    Will it work, who knows? They should be punished that is for sure.


    Can we apply the same to bankers and upper class who live thieving on ordinary people's work?

  • agreewith

    16 August 2011 8:41AM

    Criminal justice system on the hoof.

    Don't be surprised if after the results of any enquiry the findings reveal a causal link between unemployment and lack of discipline.

    In the meantime Niall Ferguson writes a new history of the workhouse this year, which gets picked up by Philip Blond and shown really to be a blue socialist panacea prior to an introduction as policy at the 2014 Tory party Conference.

    (Just watch there will be some on here who will praise this!)

  • lightacandle

    16 August 2011 8:41AM

    "He will say that people convicted of crimes last week should have to "look their victims in the eye"."

    Fine Mr Clegg. Let's start with you then shall we - line up every single young person in the country and look then straight in the eye and say sorry and then give them back their EMA, take away the increased tuition fees and restore their hope in the future whilst removing yourself from the coalition thus bringing about the end of this government and then perhaps - just perhaps - they might forgive you.

  • jereboam

    16 August 2011 8:42AM

    So we're looking to the USA, where gang culture is endemic and the police are armed to the teeth, for inspiration.
    No chance we could look to countries where gang culture is almost non existent inequality is much reduced and social cohesion exists - i.e most of Europe.

    If ever you doubted that this coalition's aim is to turn us into the 51st state, you need doubt no more. If you can afford it, move to Europe or buy into a gated community with private security. If not, keep reading your Daily Mail - you'll feel better while you're being burgled.

  • desmondsusu

    16 August 2011 8:43AM

    i swear my dogs are more intelligent than the 'leaders'.
    unless we, the people see justice in the upper echelons, seeking justice for these guys means nothing.
    i want to see the bankers on the stand.
    i want to see the david kelly thing re-opened.
    i want blair to be charged for lying us into a war that has left a country bankrupt and scarred beyond redemption.
    i want them out of libya now.
    recognizing palestine would also be cool, but when norway was about to do that - ooops.

    until such time as those in power are accountable for their actions, why should we slovenly low lives be responsible for ours.

    actually i take that back about the dogs, even the earthworms in the garden have a greater capacity for social cohesion and usefulness than these genteel slobs.

  • behemot

    16 August 2011 8:43AM

    Cameron might as well go back to Tuscany.


    No, no, we don't want him to pollute Tuscany. He is your hazardous waste, bettera found a hazardous waste processing plant for him...

  • grabsplatter

    16 August 2011 8:43AM

    I wonder how many posters will reject this idea, not because they don't agree with it, but because they fill their days by hating Clegg?

    I'm sure they'll make it blindingly obvious.

  • bennygibbs

    16 August 2011 8:44AM

    We seem to have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity here to kill two birds with one stone. It just takes a little reverse thinking. How about we put these kids to work in the banks and in Parliament, alongside and mentored by the very people they (unconsciously) modelled their grab-it-and-run criminality on. It would give the bankers and politicians something useful to do for a few months (not least with regard to teaching the oiks how to speak properly), and - by showing the looters how to loot above the law - would take them out of the criminal justice system.

  • whizgiggle

    16 August 2011 8:45AM

    jefferd

    Would like to know what crimes bankers committed - they are also paying back any debts (note, not bail-outs) where they were given and paying vast amounts of tax and providing 000s of jobs.

    How are you contributing ?

    They made bad investments, extracted the equity in advance in the form of salaries and derivatives and then needed help (bailout or very cheap emergency loans from Fed Reserve, Bank of England, etc) when the investments went bad. Everyone else in the country pays the price of the reduced tax take from a recession directly caused by their behaviour. Why do you give them so much credit?

  • languageandgenes

    16 August 2011 8:45AM

    Cameron is coming over as those extreme rightwing American Bigots,
    who yell and shout their hatred of "moral decline", and rake the money in
    by starting lots of "crusades" to fight the decling of family values, single mothers,
    the poor corrupting good christain values, and must not forget their
    primary "pet crusades", racial hatred and racism, wrapped up in fascism
    and neonazism.

    Yes, Cameron comes over like these god fearing American rightwingers.

  • Conantheballbaering

    16 August 2011 8:45AM

    Clegg to unveil 'payback scheme' for rioters

    What a good idea, why not extend it to bankers, corrupt media moguls, tax avoiding multinationals and anyone with an offshore account for tax avoidance purposes.

  • redbelly

    16 August 2011 8:47AM

    PeteLoud - the police did not cause the riot the people who rioted caused the riot.

    Examiner - "Just beat up the perpetrators and hope it will go away " ?? what should happen to them then ? Why should they not help clean up the mess they created ? Why shouldnt they have to explain their no doubt deep and complex motives to the people whose flats they burnt down and whose businesses they destroyed ? Or the the parents whose sons were killed in Birmingham ?

    Why is it typical Tory thinking to want some justice ? Please tell us what you think should happen to the people who caused some of the more violent acts we saw ? What is your solution and what do you say to those people whose homes and livelihood are now gone ?

  • mrponks

    16 August 2011 8:47AM

    PeteLoud
    16 August 2011 8:32AM
    These riots started because the police operated a shoot-to-kill operation in which they killed Mark Duggan. People in the area were angered at this police killing and protested. That protest developed into the riots and looting. Although loooting became the big issue it was secondary........etc
    Let me say it again so there is no misunderstanding. This riot was directly caused by the police.

    mm interesting point of view but complete tosh.

  • EyzeNglower

    16 August 2011 8:47AM

    Nick I will agree to your idea as long as you come and look me in the eyes and tell me you arn't a liar...which you know you can't do.

  • monstrous

    16 August 2011 8:47AM

    but nick, the riots were a payback scheme
    one of many to come...

  • holzy

    16 August 2011 8:48AM

    So basically Clegg is going to announce double punishment?

    This is ridiculous.

    The courts are already 'bending over backwards to bend defendants over forwards' (gotta love Tom Sharpe!). This, it turns out, is not exactly in the spirit of the law, but is certainly in the spirit of the tory-led government.

    After they've done their stretch for taking a bottle of water etc Clegg seems to be suggesting they get a second dose.

    This has got sod all to do with reconciliatio. It's just hot air from a clueless government.

  • kafcat

    16 August 2011 8:48AM

    Can the bankers look at people in the eye and admit their crime and be made to repay their debts too?


    Which crimes are those then?

  • baerchen

    16 August 2011 8:49AM

    @desmondsusu

    "I swear my dogs are more intelligent than 'the leaders' "

    although I do believe Cleggie has some experience in the bone-burying dept.....

  • FlamingHeck

    16 August 2011 8:49AM

    Why does it take somebody to broker a deal. Surely this should have been done before any knee jerk response from Cameron about how he's going to fix our "sick society." How can he talk about a solution to a problem that has not yet been officially identified?
    What happens when the commission comes back and says that corrupt and lying politicians, corrupt and lying senior policemen and a morally corrupt financial system may have all contributed to the unrest. Will anything be done or will it be still entirely be the fault of the poor and unemployed?

  • hindmost

    16 August 2011 8:49AM

    We're coming to the view that some sort of engagement exercise would be useful.

    Because our current strategy of rabid hysteria has failed to divert the public from recognizing that the government is incompetent, corrupt and has stood bye and done nothing about the looting engaged in by banks and politicians which make the estimated £100 million costs of the riots look like loose change.

  • whizgiggle

    16 August 2011 8:49AM

    Conantheballbaering

    What a good idea, why not extend it to bankers, corrupt media moguls, tax avoiding multinationals and anyone with an offshore account for tax avoidance purposes.

    speaking of which:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/fbi-widens-its-us-inquiry-into-news-corp-beyond-911-hacking-2337841.html

    Key quote from the story (published yesterday):

    The move comes as MPs in Westminster prepare to consider tomorrow the release of new documents related to hacking, which one former minister described as "dynamite".

    Us Guardianistas might get our daily hate today in spades :)

Comments on this page are now closed.

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  Send Up the Clowns

    by Simon Hoggart £8.99

  2. 2.  Why be Happy When You Could be Normal?

    by Jeanette Winterson £14.99

  3. 3.  Dictionary of British Place-names

    by David Mills £10.99

  4. 4.  Art of Science

    by Richard Hamblyn £20.00

  5. 5.  Tender

    by Nigel Slater £45.00

Bestsellers from the Guardian shop