Following a Freedom of Information request of 2 August the Department of Health has released minutes of a 7 July meeting [pdf] between Nadine Dorries, Frank Field and Anne Milton (Parliamentary Under-secretary of State for Health) in which possible amendments to the Health and Social Care Bill 2011, regarding abortion, were discussed. Two members of the Right to Know Campaign were also in attendance, alongside Department staff.
Also released was a letter from Frank Field to Anne Milton [pdf], in which the Labour MP expresses his thanks for the Under-secretary’s presence at the above meeting—and for “the time of your officials yesterday.” This may refer to another meeting which took place at the Department of Health, about which I was not astute enough to have requested information. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that further discussion of the subject of the Right To Know-backed amendments took place, in addition to that detailed in the minutes published here.
In the meeting Ms. Dorries stated that abortion providers have a vested interest in also providing pre-procedure counselling to women, a claim strongly denied by Ann Furedi of BPAS and Frances O’Grady of the TUC. While the Department agreed with the stated aim of the amendments—to separate the counselling and medical stages of the abortion procedure—it reminded Ms. Dorries that independent counselling “would have to have a health benefit.” Ms. Dorries also reported having “received advice that it was harder to challenge primary legislation [than secondary] and so having this set out in primary legislation rather than secondary legislation would make it more secure.”
It was agreed by the participants that “counselling was non-directional and its purpose was to allow women space to think through their options”. In addition, all present “agreed that it was of paramount importance that any change did not delay or limit access to abortion.” This sentiment was repeated by Mr. Field in his letter of 11 July.
The presence of Right To Know Campaign members in the 7 July meeting may be significant: it shows that the campaign was very closely involved with the Dorries/Field amendments, despite Ms. Dorries’ attempts to distance herself from it. The amendments were rejected in a House of Commons vote on 7 September. The Department of Health still intends to consult on the ‘spirit’ of the amendments, however, in line with its approach as discussed in the released minutes. As shown by the above pop-up at Righttoknow.org.uk, the campaign will attempt to continue its efforts to influence Government policy on this issue. Will they work as closely with DoH as has been revealed here?