Religious Charities to be Exempted from Scrutiny?

Logo of the Northern Ireland Executive

Image via Wikipedia

One of the site’s readers and frequent commenters, Lew, has spotted a bit of jiggery-pokery at Stormont that appears to have slipped under the media radar. He and I think it deserves some attention.

“Northern Ireland proposes end to public benefit test for religious charities”

According to this piece religious charities operating in Northern Ireland might not have to prove that they provide a public benefit in order to keep their charitable status.  The Charities Act (Northern Ireland) 2008 says that all charities must prove they operate for the public benefit.

But last month the Northern Ireland Executive asked the Department for Social Development to draft legislation that would reintroduce a presumption of public benefit for religious organisations and possibly for charities that address poverty. The legislation will have to be introduced to the assembly before 7 March in order for it to be passed before the assembly is dissolved in advance of the general election in May.

Given the wealth of research that suggests religious charities discriminate in the provision of their services and in the people they employ, I think public attention should be drawn to this.  Moreover, as was made clear by the recent Hazel Stewart court case, people who claim to have profound religious faith can also behave in depraved ways – justifying it or seeking forgiveness on the basis of their faith.

Therefore, the presumption that religious charities always operate for the public good is, in fact flawed.  Religious charities – like secular ones – should be subject to the same processes of scrutiny.

Therefore I’d ask that you write to your MLA (here’s a full list) and ask for their position on this legislation and urge that they vote against a change in the law.

The Journalism of Ego: Fergal Keane and the Irish Economic Mess

Panorama (TV series)

Image via Wikipedia

Fergal Keane’s report for BBC Panorama this evening was typical of the journalist’s self-obsessed style – psychophantic interviews, old mates, his old school – new enigmatic beard and flowing, greying locks.

Forget investigative journalism, think masturbatory journalism.

It doesn’t have to be like this. Try Michael Lewis’ analysis of the Irish economic mess in Vanity Fair

The Way I Tell ‘em

Nigel Farage.

UKIP Leader Nigel Farage will be in Northern Ireland next week. Image via Wikipedia

A commenter on a previous post has drawn attention to the fact that The Belfast Telegraph is reporting that veteran comedian Frank Carson is planning to put his hand in his pocket to support UKIP – to help introduce non-sectarian politics into Northern Ireland. Well done Frank – and Nigel Farage, UKIP Leader.

Carson is quoted in the article as saying, “People in Northern Ireland vote for their church, they don’t vote with their heads, it is ridiculous.” Well said. And I wish UKIP every success establishing their brand of national, non-sectarian politics here.

It’s interesting, however, that, according to the Telegraph piece, UKIP wishes to scrap the Scottish and Welsh assemblies, as well as the Barnett Formula, but plans to maintain the NI Assembly. Although there are heavy hints that the party wishes to make our local legislature rather smaller. Can I suggest no more than 20 elected members?

It’s interesting that despite not having constituency associations everywhere and hordes of members UKIP plans to contest the Assembly elections. The Conservative Party has been organised here for two decades but appears reluctant to do so. However, it’s encouraging that at least one national party has the guts to contest elections in every part of the UK. Well done Frank and Nigel.

Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/comedian-frank-carson-backing-uk-independence-party-15076686.html#ixzz1DNcISwbO

Unequivocal Support?

Debating chamber in Scottish Parliament building

On the same day that Conservatives in Scotland and Wales will be electing members to their Parliament and Assembly, Conservatives in NI will be barred from so doing. Image via Wikipedia

Alex Kane has written an excellent piece in Today’s Newsletter. Here’s just a taster. You can read the full article in the comments to my previous post.

“It is worth noting that I have seen the words ‘unequivocal support’ used in Central Office documents in 1989, 1992 and 1996. It turned out to mean nothing on those occasions and it means nothing now. On the same day that Conservatives in Scotland and Wales will be electing members to their Parliament and Assembly, Conservatives in NI will be barred from so doing. Not by their own choice, mind you, but simply because Central Office doesn’t want the Secretary of State to have to take sides when it really matters. It seems he can say what he likes when he is in Opposition—but not when he is in Government!” – Alex Kane in Today’s Newsletter

Why Conservatives are Wimps

DAVOS/SWITZERLAND, 29JAN10 - David Cameron, Le...

Is Cameron serious about detoxifying our politics? Image via Wikipedia

This is an extended version of a comment I have made on my previous post. I felt it deserved greater oxygen.

A few of my former colleagues in the local Conservative Party organisation have criticised me for being a tad lukewarm re. yesterday’s announcement about Party organisation here. This is my attempt at an explanation. Interestingly, Alex Kane, former Head of Communications at the UUP, agrees with me (see comments on yesterday’s post).

The point I have made is that the local Conservative Party Area Executive threw all its toys out of the pram because CCHQ refused to contest the Assembly elections. The Area Chairman, Irwin Armstrong, resigned over the issue. Now he has un-resigned when nothing has changed.

The excuse for the U-turn is that because of the delay in reaching an agreement with CCHQ it would be impossible to get ready for elections that are still several months away. But that’s nonsense – as has been pointed out by Seymour Major over on his blog.

Even a single candidate put forward for the Assembly elections would make clear that the Conservatives are serious and intend to define themselves as a brand distinct from sectarian “Unionism” and “Nationalism”. There is no point to democratic politics if elections aren’t contested. Constant preparation for success is not the point – it’s about democracy, plain and simple. If the brand is dodgy, no-one will vote for it. That’s politics.

But the end game in the process is about de-toxifying our politics. We’re either in that game or we aren’t. And, it would appear, the local Conservatives seem to have decided that they are not – and that implies sloppy and wimpy leadership.

Conservatives Dump UUP?

Logo of Conservative Party UK

Image via Wikipedia

I have received a media release from Conservative Central Office confirming that the Party will be organising in Northern Ireland from here on as the Conservative Party (no reference to “Unionist”). The release makes clear that the Party will be contesting local government elections in May.

However the release makes no reference to the Assembly elections.

I’ll be commenting in more detail on this announcement later. (In fact, no need, just read my comments on this post).

The full text of the release from CCHQ reads as follows:

The Conservative Party in Northern Ireland has committed itself to an ongoing programme of campaigning and development and will shortly move into a new campaign headquarters in Bangor, Co. Down. A full time member of staff will be based at the headquarters and one of the Party’s most senior campaign directors has been appointed to liaise with the Party in Northern Ireland.

The Party is committed to the development of progressive centre right politics which offer the electorate of Northern Ireland the opportunity to cast their votes for and participate directly with the national Government of the United Kingdom.  The Party will continue to review how Conservatives in Northern Ireland can play a full part in the Conservative Party as in every other part of the United Kingdom and senior Conservatives in Northern Ireland will work with the Board of the Party to develop that relationship.

Central to that development will be the Party’s desire to see Conservative Associations formed in every Northern Ireland constituency and an active programme of membership recruitment at a local level.

Conservative Party co-chairman Baroness Warsi said: “The Conservative Party in Northern Ireland has the unequivocal support of the Party nationally. Politics in Northern Ireland continues to evolve and we are determined to be at the heart of that evolution. Our approach will be one of active engagement – starting with the fielding of candidates in the Local Council elections in May.”

ENDS

Corporation Tax and Denial

Assorted international currency notes.

Image via Wikipedia

Martin Maginnis made the bizarre claim today that cuts to the Northern Ireland budget represented a threat to devolution. What’s he suggesting? Perhaps that his next hissy fit will demand that direct rule be reinstated if the cuts aren’t reversed. Or perhaps he plans to declare fiscal UDI.

Although if the latter course were pursued he may find that the fiscal deficit would be on a par – if not worse – than the Republic of Ireland. Hence the need for massive UK subvention – cuts or not.

The fact is that the block grant has been hardly affected by ‘cuts’ at all. It is true that capital allocation has been reduced but the current account has been held static. If public sector pay can be restrained, and revenue generation enhanced, the overall effect will be minimal.

But I suspect that an epidemic of hissy fits will develop if – as has been suggested by the Secretary of State – Northern Ireland achieves self-determination in terms of corporation tax setting. I cannot see Maginnis – or many of his leftie DUP buddies – agreeing to breaks for companies at the expense of the block grant. The stumbling block is always going to be lack of vision on the part of our nanny-dependent politicians.

Strategic vision is required, of course. The Northern Ireland Economic Reform Group has been very eloquent in terms of filling the communications vacuum – arguing the strategic case for corporation tax reduction. However, I’d suggest that it, too, is shuffling away from an immediate and radical reduction in corporation tax. A better strategy, in my view, would be to argue for an immediate and radical reduction in corporation tax rate –  with the block grant cost phased (rather than the other way around). But there must be pain in order to focus minds on the end-game.

To date the ‘cuts’ have been minimal. More radical cuts may indeed be required if we are to have a competitive corporation tax rate compared to RoI. But that is a price worth paying – and it will require the Executive to start thinking about the businesses it wishes to attract.  It will also need to focus on the skills required in the local workforce to service the needs of businesses – local and not-so-local – that will locate and grow here as a result of competitive business taxation rates.

Gerry Adams and the Deficit

Gerry Adams at the Fermanagh Commemoration, re...

Image via Wikipedia

Quite why Gerry Adams decided to appear on this radio programme in Louth/Meath is beyond me but he has obviously convinced himself that he has a firm grasp on economics and deficit reduction strategies.

The host of the programme is having none of Gerry’s bizarre mathematics and vacillation.

Adams is all over the place – failing even to understand a GCSE definition of fiscal deficits. He seems to think that throwing in references to bond markets will convince the listeners he knows what he’s talking about.

He doesn’t and I suspect the listeners to this Louth/Meath radio station will have enjoyed this interview. The show host is Paxonian in his persistence. Fabulous stuff and a must-listen.

Rodney McCune Lone Voice for Conservatives & Unionists

Free twitter badge

Image via Wikipedia

Rodney McCune (not sure who he is, by the way) must be thinking no-one has noticed. But it would appear that he has hijacked the Conservatives in NI/UCUNF/VoteforChange Twitter account.

If you visit the VoteforChangeNI website (built, it would appear, by Conservative Central Office – and last updated in May 2010) and link to the Conservatives in NI twitter account, the only tweets on the account all link to the chap McCune’s blog.

McCune, it would appear, is a kindof  Twitter-Squatter (if indeed he is the author and master of the aforementioned Twitter account – perhaps it’s a Conservatives in NI/UCUNF/VoteforChange/McCune groupie).

There is no mention of the word Conservative on his personal blog – but he seems content to get the traffic from well-meaning followers of the political dead parrot that is Conservatives in NI/UCUNF/VoteforChange Yada Yada.

Blogger Solidarity

Conservative Party Logo

Image by Slugger O'Toole via Flickr

Chekov, over on the 3000 Versts Blog has highlighted an open letter from two local bloggers to Owen Paterson, NI Secretary of State, and chief architect of the partnership with the UUP (that crashed and burned with UCUNF).

As an act of solidarity with my fellow bloggers O’Neill and Dilettante (and Chekov) I am reproducing it here. I’ll be interested to see the response and will publish it here (if it ever comes).

Dear Mr. Paterson,

We are writing to you concerning the position of the Conservative Party vis-à-vis its activity in Northern Ireland. As Conservative and Unionist bloggers we have been firm supporters of Mr. Cameron’s policy of political engagement in the province, and we hope to be able to continue to facilitate in our small way the efforts of the party there. In recent weeks there has been some confusion about the future of the party in Northern Ireland, and if you were able to clarify that position for us, we would then be able to pass it to our readership.

Kind Regards,

Dilettante, oneill

Next Page »


Say so!

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite.
Add to Technorati Favorites