Posts Tagged 'Education'

Ambition, Identity and Competition: An Education Challenge

Picture of Harland & Wolff David and Goliath c...

Image via Wikipedia

I’ve had quite a flurry of correspondence since my post yesterday about Dawn Purvis’ report and working party looking at underachievement in working class Protestant areas of Belfast. Some people take exception to me supporting a selection based system (despite the fact that it produces the best GCSE and A Levels results in the UK and the highest level of social mobility in the UK).  Others believe that Comprehensive systems are more equitable (despite the fact that they produce the worst form of inequality – good schools only available to children of parents who can afford to pay the fees).

In my view the problems in working class areas of Northern Ireland in terms of educational under-achievement is explained, largely, by three things:

  • The failure of parents to instil educational ambition in their children (itself the result of lack of education) as evidenced by poor participation in post-primary selection tests
  • A parochial definition of identity and culture that is counter-intellectual (and sees education as a threat to identity)
  • A non-competitive attitude to education (a perception that an academic focused education is best left to the toffs)

In short, the problem of under-achievement by these working class communities is the fault of the communities themselves – not society’s fault or even the fault of politicians.  Moreover, Protestant/Loyalist tribal “culture” militates against modern-mindedness and free thought – important attributes, I’d suggest, in an increasingly global and interconnected society.

My challenge to Dawn Purvis and her working party is to create some structure, some body, some thing that seeks to reverse the lack of ambition, the parochial definition of identity and the non-competitive attitude to education. If such a body is put in place (and it doesn’t require the government or the Executive to put it in place) I may be even willing to lend a helping hand (if it’s wanted).

Sheer Infuriating Hypocrisy

 

Peter Robinson at the Evolve Public Policy Forum

Image by DUP Photos via Flickr

 

It has taken me a full day to temper the invective I was planning to use in response to Peter Robinson’s contribution to the education debate. To those of you who wanted me to welcome the DUP leader’s new-found fondness for secular education – you’re about to be disappointed.

This man has been involved in one of the most divisive forces in Northern Ireland politics. The DUP has systematically propped-up the malevolent cultural apartheid that corrupts every corner of our civil society. But now he wants a single state education system. This man runs a political party and front bench team that wants creationist garbage taught in our schools and “intelligent design theory” featured in our museums. His party’s flat-earth perspectives and reactionary dogma is the utter antithesis of all that is right-minded and free-thinking. He fronts a rag-bag collection of bigots and political fossils that have helped put Northern Ireland on the international laughing stock map of small-minded mini nations.

His motivation for having a single state-funded education system, with funding removed for state schools, runs counter to logic and decency. Don’t get me wrong. I’m no advocate of Irish medium schools – I don’t believe that state funding should have been extended to such schools. They are patently absurd. However many schools that he describes as church schools attain some of the highest standards of academic excellence not just in Northern Ireland – but also in the United Kingdom.  To remove state funding from some of our finest schools would be a public scandal.

Few, if any, of our finest church schools are “faith schools” in a pejorative sense. None is permitted to discriminate on the grounds of religious faith when employing staff. All adhere to state recommended curricula. Most teach children good standards of citizenship and mutual respect.

As an Atheist I choose to send one of my my children to a Quaker school – a school that makes clear that it accepts children of parents of faith and those (like me and my wife) who have no faith. It also happens to be a school that attains incredibly high academic standards. It certainly does not force religious doctrine or liturgy on its pupils. In all respects it adheres to the academic guidelines defined by the Accord Coalition.

Indeed, while Northern Ireland’s decency and civil society have been undermined by politicians, clergy and the two-tribe mentality of the state, our teachers have been beacons of tolerance. Our much maligned education system has managed to produce wonderful, well rounded and decent children against all the odds. And our so-called “integrated system” has been at the vanguard, often, of the two-tribe mentality when some of our best schools have focused, instead, on producing some of the best academic standards in Western Europe.  State-funded grammar schools help produce the highest scores in GCSE and A Level results in the United Kingdom.

For readers that aren’t familiar with the aims of the coalition, here they are. And, for the benefit of Peter Robinson, I suggest that he encourages all state-funded schools to embrace these aims. Then we will, indeed, have one system of education.

Declaration of Aims of the Accord Coalition:

In a pluralist, multi-cultural society, the state should promote tolerance and recognition of different values and beliefs. Given the dangers of segregation and the importance of community cohesion we need schools that welcome all and are committed to non-discrimination. Schools should promote a culture of questioning, of knowledge, of respect and of exploration of values, where students develop their own identities and sense of place in the world. We believe all state-funded schools should:

1. Operate admissions policies that take no account of pupils’ – or their parents’ – religion or beliefs.

2. Operate recruitment and employment policies that do not discriminate on the grounds of religion or belief.

3. Follow an objective, fair and balanced syllabus for education about religious and non-religious beliefs – whether determined by their local authority or by any future national syllabus or curriculum for RE.

4. Be made accountable under a single inspection regime for RE, Personal, Social & Health Education (PSHE) and Citizenship.

5. Provide their pupils with inclusive, inspiring and stimulating assemblies in place of compulsory acts of worship.

And we commit to work with each other locally and nationally to turn public support for inclusive education into a campaign for reform that the government cannot ignore.

Graham Brady for 1922 Committee Chair

I am delighted to note that both Tim Montgomerie and Janet Daley are supporting Graham Brady to become Chairman of the 1922 Committee.

Graham has been an avid supporter of Grammar Schools – and the concept of academic selection.  He also, as Janet Daley puts it, “represents the very best of what Conservative values ought to be: genuine compassion, concern for social mobility (hence his commitment to grammar schools) and national integrity.”

Graham has also been a supporter of Conservative Party organisation in Northern Ireland – and was a key mover and shaker for the Conservative Party to recognise embryonic Conservative Associations here over two decades ago.

He has visited Northern Ireland regularly over the years – and I was delighted to attend the Inaugural Friends of Grammar Schools event at the House of Lords in 2008 (an organisation he founded).

I wish him every success.

The School Report

The School Report, screened last night on BBC Northern Ireland (DoubleBand Films), was an excellent treatment of an issue that is top of our minds – as children prepare for the new testing procedures being set for admission to grammar schools.  The film was obviously made prior to the grammar schools making public their intention to set their own tests – outside the control of the Department of Education.

Fiona Millar, education journalist and a passionate believer in the comprehensive school system, and Chris Woodhead, former Chief Inspector of Schools, who is firmly pro-selection, featured in the film. 

While it was made clear in the film that Fiona Millar was a “friend of Cherie Blair” what was not mentioned was that she is also the partner of Alastair Campbell, former Head of Communications for Tony Blair. 

As a result, in the segment where she and Woodhead met Catriona Ruane, it came across very clearly that both Millar and Ruane were both ideologically driven.  Both are driven by dogma and both are deaf to the argument that the failure in our education system – children leaving school without basic literacy and numeracy – is more the fault of the primary system that the secondary system.  This point was made repeatedly in the film and ignored by both Millar and Ruane.  They also ignored the fact that our current system produces better results at GCSE and A Level than any other part of the UK. 

Woodhead was right to warn parents not to entrust Northern Ireland’s education system to the Assembly.  Thankfully, since the film was made, parents and principals have managed to achieve some level of self-control outside the system.  Primary schools are ignoring the advice of the Department and preparing children for the grammar school admission tests.  While the arrangements are not perfect they have a feeling of solidity about them. 

Over time, I’d hope, that all grammar schools would use a common and standardised entrance assessment.  However people power has triumphed in the face of the Department of Education’s incompetence.  That is to be applauded.

Should Children be Able to Opt Out of RE?

I had an email from Brian McClinton about a very interesting topic for discussion at next week’s meeting of the Humanist Association of NI.  If you would like to attend this meeting as a guest perhaps you might like to contact me and I’ll forward your details on to Brian and he can provide you with venue details.  I’m going to try to attend myself.

Alison Mawhinney has confirmed that she will speak at next Thursday’s meeting (11th June).  Her topic is ‘Opting out of RE’. 

Dr Mawhinney is a member of the School of Law at QUB. She and a couple of colleagues have received government research funding to look into the question of the teaching of religious education in schools and in particular the question of opt-out provisions.  As part of this research, they would hope to talk to young people from humanist backgrounds as well as humanist parents and associations.

Education is an important area for Humanists, and the opt out provisions from RE and Assemblies raise a number of questions for us. For example:

Do young people from minority and secular belief backgrounds feel that opt-outs respect their right to religious freedom?

To what extent do young people feel that opting out impacts negatively or positively on their sense of belonging to their school community?

Do parents and communities consider that opt-outs in schools protect religious freedom?

In GB, Sixth Formers can opt out without parental consent, but not in NI. Why is this so?

Should opting in replace opting out?

Friends of Grammars

Graham Brady, another wonderful supporter of the Conservatives in Northern Ireland, has helped create a splendid resource for selection campaigners over at the Friends of the Grammar Schools site. 

I was invited to a launch reception of the organisation at the House of Lords about a year ago and it’s great to see the organisation develop. 

The key facts page is especially punchy - in particular that much quoted statistic that Northern Ireland, the only devolved administration to have an all-selective based system, achieves the best results in GCSE (72% of pupils achieve an A* to C grade versus 62% nationally).  Another interesting point, of the top 10 best performing local authorities in the UK, 7 have a selective based system of education.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 19 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 19 other followers