Archive for June, 2010

Adams and Streisand

Barbra is a fan of Gerry Adams

The BBC aired a rather saccharine portrayal of Gerry Adams last night.  The documentary featured Gerry pottering in his back garden and an interview with Tony Blair expressing his ‘friendship’ for Adams and recounting tales of Adams’ tree-hugging during peace negotiations.

More bizarre was an interview with Barbra Streisand who eulogised Adams to the rafters.  A veritable hero, according to Ms Streisand.

This struck me as rather odd.  After all Barbra is also rather fond of Israel and the Israeli state.  Indeed on the State’s 30th anniversary she gave a performance in honour of it – beamed across Israel – and even sang the Israeli national anthem.  A building is dedicated to her father at Hebrew University in Jerusalem and she visited Israel and met with Yitzak Shamir, the Israeli Prime Minister, when her film, Yentl, premièred in Israel in 1984.

Sinn Fein, on the other hand, has never made much of a secret of its abhorrence of the Israeli state.  The IRA had a much vaunted ‘partnership’ with the PLO in the 1970s.  The Party – of which Mr Adams is President – routinely refers to Israel as a “rogue state.”  Adams has also upset the Israelis by meeting with Hamas and referring to Gaza as an open prison.

Not sure what Barbra would make of all that.  Would Gerry still be her hero if she knew?

Belfast Telegraph and New Politics

It’s encouraging that the Belfast Telegraph is beginning to note the Zeitgeist made evident by the most recent general election results in Northern Ireland.

The paper, today, “launches a major debate on moving Northern Ireland politics away from tribal headcounts.” I gather the Telegraph will be featuring my own tuppenceworth later in the week.  However, it is kicking off today with a contribution from Queen’s University Politics Professor Rick Wilford.

Wilford notes that a large percentage of the electorate wants a new politics beyond the tribal head-counting that passes for politics here.

He notes, “The General Election witnessed a depressing reversion to sectarian type given the attempts to engineer both unionist and nationalist electoral pacts.”

Well done to David Gordon at the Belfast Telegraph for this initiative.  Perhaps it’s the start of a major sea-change in Northern Ireland politics.  I live in hope.

New Broom?

Ian Parsley over on his blog (a blog, incidentally, that now blocks any comments from yours truly) has a bit of a go at his Party colleagues following the NI Area Conservative Party AGM yesterday.  Indeed it very much looks like Mr Parsley is planning yet another defection – this time to the UUP.

Sour grapes, perhaps, that the Conservative Party membership doesn’t appear to find his self-seeking, ego-driven ways to their taste.

I wish Irwin Armstrong – the new Area Chairman – well.  However, Armstrong is tainted by association to the UCUNF sectarian debacle.  As, indeed, are other Exec members who went along with the charade that UCUNF became.

However, I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt.  Although I’m expecting an unequivocal statement soon that the relationship with the UUP is ending and that the Conservative Party locally intends to re-establish its non-sectarian right of centre credentials.

Whether it can succeed, of course, is questionable.

What kind of democracy?

Democracies where voting patterns are entirely decided by ethnic group, and where parties gravitate away from the centre ground, are not really democracies at all but tribal head-counting competitions.  Ed West, Telegraph.co.uk June 17, 2010

Peter McCann and Conservatism

Peter McCann – one of the Conservative Party nominees for the Westminster elections who was, disgracefully, overlooked – added a very lengthy comment to a post I published last week.  However, to give his comment the status it deserves I have decided to give Peter his own ‘guest’ post.

Peter’s contribution is timely.  In just over a week’s time the Conservatives in Northern Ireland hold their AGM.  I gather than Tim Lewis – the current Area Chairman – is not putting himself forward.  I only hope that the party, locally, has the guts to elect a new Executive that summarily suspends its relationship with the Ulster Unionist Party – and starts working to restore non-sectarian right-of-centre politics to Northern Ireland after the UCUNF fiasco.

A Forecast Calamity: A Guest Post by Peter McCann

The UCUNF project became unsustainable as soon as Conservative values and principles where casually jettisoned simply to keep the pact going. What began as a strategy to end sectarianism within Unionist politics actually ended up doing exactly the opposite. As soon as this happened the Conservative Party should have had the courage to walk away.

There can be no excuse that people were not aware of UCUNF’s failings. The calamity was well forecast. Alarm bells within Conservative circles were being sounded for many, many months and were cynically ignored. Those who spoke out were ostracised and mocked by the ‘party faithful’. These ‘experienced politicos’ put greater value in ‘obeying orders’ than following their moral compass.

If UCUNF had adhered to non-sectarian and centre-right principles then the result of the election could have been very different.

UCUNF could and should have brought a realignment within Unionism. Something that would have been welcomed by a sizeable number of voters. Realignment is not, as has been portrayed by some, Unionist Unity. Unionist Unity is simply ‘them and us’ politics that is devoid of any mature or rational thinking. The realignment that is needed is something that redefines what it means to be pro-union. Pro-union is celebrating our links with and contribution to the UK. It must stand for civil and religious freedom, where all sections of society can participate – regardless of sex or sexual orientation; whatever religion or non-religion; it should not matter if you are able bodied or disabled – we must build a forgiving and tolerant society of equals. Any election campaign based on Conservative principles such as these would and should have been extremely uncomfortable for some within the UUP. It could well have prompted the defection of those not in favour of inclusive and non-tribal politics.

Would that have been a bad thing? I don’t think so.

It is the right of any citizen to aspire to a United Ireland. Many have this aspiration yet also accept being within the UK is the best place to be. They willingly play a constructive and meaningful role within the UK – hundreds of thousands of our fellow countrymen and women do this every single day whether they live in Belfast or London or elsewhere in the UK. They are tax-payers. They are business owners, teachers, doctors, police officers, charity workers, voluntary workers. They have always placed helping their fellow citizen above their long-term political aspirations. The main Unionist parties have failed to embrace or even recognise this group. The Unionist parties are paying for this stubbornness when it comes to elections – the questions remain as to why politicians behave in this way and if they are capable of, or even want, change.

Each citizen has an equal contribution to make – the exclusion of any group or section of our society damages and weakens everyone. Any realignment must see the end of Green and Orange tribalism and allow the politics of the left and right to thrive. It is a world where our languages and dialects; music and culture and history belong to us all and we should celebrate them together.

Politics must rediscover its priorities. We live in a society where women are still treated as second class citizens. A world struggling with recession, where jobs are being lost and people are losing their homes. A country where ‘tolerance’ is purely used to cover-up sexism, sectarianism and racism. It is the duty of all politicians to work for those that are in most need. To defend and protect those without a voice. To eradicate intolerance and to support freedom. The election result showed that UCUNF failed to convince many that it was willing or able to do this.

UCUNF is rightly to be consigned to the dustbin of political history. The so called ‘unity candidate’ in FST and the eagerness to find a ‘unity’ strategy in South Belfast clearly revealed that the project had morphed into blatant seat grubbing. The fact that UCUNF tried to claim Rodney Connor’s vote as part of its 100,000 votes is as embarrassing as it is shameful. If the voters in FST elect an abstentionist MP that is their democratic right. The ‘Special Circumstances’ excuse was a sham, it was dangerous and undermined democracy. Come the Assembly elections next May Martin McGuinness could become NI’s First Minister. That too is democracy speaking and all democrats must accept the result. No politician should pretend to be a democrat and then actually work against the will of the people. To try and override democracy is falling into the trap of fascism.

If the Westminster election has taught us anything it is that the electorate wanted a real choice. UCUNF failed to provide it. You cannot tell voters they are being offered a new beginning when it was obvious that this was just a simple re-spray job – and a botched one at that. Those that willingly peddled this charade to the electorate must question their motives.

We are all still navel gazing and picking over the bones of what went wrong. We are foolishly looking for leadership from the very people who have serially failed to provide it. The NI Conservative Party’s reputation has been tarnished by this whole sordid affair. Can it recover – I am not sure. The UUP and its current leadership are either unable or unwilling to deliver the necessary vision for change. It is time they realised that just trying to be the ‘top-dog’ in Unionism is backward thinking. They need to offer a broader and inclusive vision to the electorate. I know a great many UUP members who have worked for years to make their party embrace modernism and inclusivity. It has been an uphill struggle for them and I continue to wish them luck. The coming months may force them to decide if their future is staying inside the UUP or creating a new political home.

Tens of thousands are not even on the electoral register. Of those who can vote fewer and fewer are bothering to turn out. There is an obvious message in these facts for all political parties.

Whether as a society, a community or a neighbourhood it is only by working together that we will find solutions to our greatest problems. We can’t expect any sustainable political, economic or society fixes to be imported. It might be difficult for some of us to work together but that is democracy. We have all been on a difficult journey to mend our society and fix our problems. It is a journey that is without end and one that has taken courage from all sides to even begin. No one said it would be easy – giving up or going backwards is not an option.

Spaghetti and Creationist Monsters

Forgive me for tramping over the same old ground, but I’m delighted that my old friend from the Conservatives in Northern Ireland, David Timson, has written an open letter to the Trustees of the National Museums of Northern Ireland.  He makes a noble point about the need for equality for noodly fans.

David has also drawn my attention to a new Facebook Group called No Creationist Exhibition at the Museum of Ulster. It already has 412 members.  I encourage readers to join.

Here’s David’s letter to the Trustees:

An Open letter to the Trustees of the National Museums of Northern Ireland

I hear some chap called McCausland wrote to you recently asking you to present “alternative views of creation” in your museums. While the ensuing debate has largely been between those favouring a scientific view and those preferring the six day biblical creation myth, I am sure you will want to represent other alternatives.

The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster has grown from humble origins in rural Kansas to a global movement with tens of thousands of followers. Its adherents, known as pastafarians, believe that the Universe and life on earth were created by a giant spaghetti monster. While science teaches that the earth is billions of years old, pastafarians hold that the Flying Spaghetti Monster can alter scientific measurements with a single touch of His Noodly Appendage. They have also noted a correlation between the number of pirates and global temperatures (Sammy Wilson, take note!)

As a scientist, I believe that all of this is utter nonsense put forward by people who spend too much time dreaming about being touched by the aforementioned noodly appendage. Nevertheless, in the name of diversity, I look forward to you giving equal space to pastafarian and creationist theories.

Yours faithfully
Dr David J Timson
Senior Lecturer in Biochemistry
Queen’s University, Belfast

Keynes v Hayek

I was browsing the Adam Smith Institute web site…as you do…and came across this Keynes v Hayek ‘rap’.

Given the Keynesian Spend v Deficit Fix debate that went on during our own recent election campaign – this is very relevant.  Surprisingly educational too.

Beyond Unionism

Tonight’s Spotlight programme on BBC1 Northern Ireland presented an excellent analysis of the state of “unionism”.  The programme seemed to reach the conclusion that the Unionist brand was dying.  In short unionist unity is hardly worth the effort when no-one – least of all the DUP and UUP – seem to know what unionism means any more.  The electorate is none the wiser either.

This is, of course, true.  Although I’d go further and suggest that Irish nationalism is also – increasingly – irrelevant as a means of describing ideology and policy.

The new politics that the electorate seems to yearn is one that focuses on improving this place.  And that’s where the political battle-ground should take place – convincing voters of the merits of a right-of-centre or left-of-centre policy agenda.

(Oh and let’s not fixate on the interminable issue of Irish or British union – because most people couldn’t care less any longer.  Frankly we’re bored with it).

Needless to say, I’d like to see the emergence of a right-of-centre political dynamic.  But, for it to succeed, it’s clear that it will need to define itself in the following ways:

  • It will need to have a strong, articulate and non-sectarian voice
  • It will need to show a commitment to a secular political future
  • It will require a strong (and worldly) leader
  • It will focus on re-defining Northern Ireland as a confident and outward looking place
  • It will help define a future built on hard work and a reduced role for the public sector
  • It will establish this place as a great place to live
  • It will give a voice to those who have been disenfranchised by the politics of Orange and Green
  • It will define itself as a meritocratic movement – committed to social mobility
  • It will not allow narrow-minded parochial interests to stifle its ambition to make Northern Ireland a player on the global stage

If it achieves all of these things then it will be worth supporting.  And, needless to say, no political party that calls itself Unionist could achieve any of these things.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 19 other followers

Musings on things political and secular…

This is my site where I share my world views for anyone who might be remotely interested. Visit only if you think the content is interesting. Oh and comment is free. So go right ahead and agree or disagree. But, please, be kind and polite (especially to me).
Add to Technorati Favorites

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 19 other followers