9 October 2011

LONDON BLOGNIC! 10 Oct Monday 7:30 pm at The Coal Hole

CLICK ME and DONATE!

It is time for a LONDON BLOGNIC!

We are going to meet at The Coal Hole on The Strand near the Savoy.  There is Holy Mass at Corpus Christi on Maiden Lane at 6:30 pm (Extraordinary Form).  We will go straight over to the Coal Hole after Mass.  So, 7:30 is approximate.  You get the idea.  I figure we will be there for a couple hours, at least.

It will be nice to be in (or at least near) the Liberties of the Savoy!  The tipstaves won’t be able to haul us off to the sponging house.

London Blognic at The Coal Hole

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

As long-time readers know, “blognic” is a blend of “blog and picnic”.

A blognic is a social appointment intended get people together to talk and have a drink or some food.  Not much more than that!  It is meant to be fun and bring together face to face people who participate on this blog.  Sometimes when I travel people ask if they can meet me.  This is a way to do that.

UPDATE 10 Oct 2037 GMT:

A reader sent the following:

I can’t be there, but a good choice, Father; I’ve had some decent pints in the Coal Hole.

I don’t know what the food’s like (the pubco that owns it, Nicholsons, usually does plain pub grub in a competent manner), but there’s usually an interesting range of ales.

Going by this 1830 map of the Liberty of the Savoy, I’d say the Coal Hole was just within it:

If anyone is trying to follow it, note that the map is oddly oriented, having North towards the bottom left corner. Of course most of the roads have changed due to redevelopment, but if you take a line on Southampton Street, which still exists on the other side of the Strand, it looks like the un-named road on the 1830 map, in between Beaufort Buildings and Cecil Street (neither of which exists under that name today) is the present Carting Lane. The Coal Hole is on the eastern corner of Carting Lane and the Strand, which seems to put it firmly in the Savoy.

I am so glad! We will be safe and snug in the snug… or in the basement. It seems as if we might have a good crowd!

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Blognics, O'Brian Tags, On the road | Tagged , , , , | 15 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can I have my pet blessed?

From a reader:

Is having a pet blessed a odd ball thing? I would feel odd about
bringing my dog into a church. She is a good dog but still.

I have no problem at all with blessing pets or other animals.  I once stood outside a little church in Italy and blessed pigs and horses on the feast of St. Anthony the Abbot.

God gave stewardship of all material creation to man and that duty was not lifted with the Fall of our First Parents.  Holy Church has blessings for animals of different kinds, as well as deprecatory prayers against noxious, pestiferous, annoying animals… such as squirrels.  I hate squirrels.  But I digress.

Animals were given to us by God, as part of creation which He calls good, for our proper use and our enjoyment.  Animals benefit us in many ways and it is normal that we should call down God’s blessings on them so that they can continue to be even more useful and beneficial.  Pets have an important part to play in our lives.  So long as we keep them with a proper perspective and see them for what they are, they are good.

You can take a copy of pages of the old Rituale Romanum translated into English with you. Otherwise, even better, get Father his own copy of the reprint of Fr. Weller’s translation of the Rituale which has the blessings.

Don’t bring your cattle into church, however.  Fido can stay outside with Anathema and Scourge the Cat.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, O'Brian Tags, The Drill | Tagged , , | 14 Comments

QUAERITUR: SSPX and fulfilling Sunday Mass obligation

From a reader:

I have heard from a solid priest-friend that attending an SSPX Mass is perfectly permissible for a Catholic in good standing, and such a one can even there receive communion. Today I was to go to an EF Mass at a Catholic church, but due to unforeseen train delays this was not possible. I was with friends, as I am in a new environment, and they suggested we go to the SSPX church. Even though I felt uneasy, I went along, thinking that it was probably all right (indeed, they did not seem worried, even though I was). Does this suffice to fulfill my Sunday obligation?

The Code of Canon Law for the Latin Church says:

can. 1248 1. The precept of participating in the Mass is satisfied by assistance at a Mass which is celebrated anywhere in a Catholic rite either on the holy day or on the evening of the preceding day.

This means that if you go to a chapel of the SSPX on the day of precept or the evening before and attend Holy Mass, you fulfill your obligation.  The SSPX celebrate in a Catholic Rite.

However, I do not recommend that people do this frequently, because frequency can undermine their unity with the Roman Pontiff.  The risk of this erosion of unity could in part depend on the manner of preaching and many other factors.

Also, I will not recommend reception of Holy Communion at an SSPX chapel at this time, unless the conditions of your life are such that it would be very difficult to get to another church or parish actually in union with the local diocese and Rome.  The obstacles must be serious, but they cannot be easily spelled out because the circumstances of people’s lives differ so much.

So, yes, you all fulfilled your Mass obligation.  However, I will not go so far as to say that attendance at a SSPX chapel is “perfectly” permissible.  It is permissible under certain circumstances.

If it were “perfectly” permissible, then the Holy Father would not be so concerned about bringing them back into clear unity with him and his successors.

Thank you for being concerned enough to ask.  This question comes up fairly often and it bears review.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , , | 18 Comments

Diocese of Madison, WI, to stop regular Holy Communion under both kinds. The indult ran out in 2005.

On the site of the parish of the Cathedral of Madison in Wisconsin, where His Excellency Most Rev. Robert Morlino is, by the grace of God, the ordinary, there is a pdf of the parish bulletin in which it is explained that they are ending regular distribution of Holy Communion under both kinds.

You will recall that at the Cathedral of Phoenix, where Bishop Olmsted is, by the grace of God, ordinary, the same decision was made.

Here is the bulletin blurb from Msgr. Kevin Holmes, Rector of the Cathedral in Madison with my emphases and comments.

Dear Friends in Christ:
Maybe you noticed a story in last week?s Catholic Herald about new
norms for Communion under both species in the Diocese of Phoenix. You may have wondered why this story from Arizona received such prominent coverage here (on page 3 of the Catholic Herald, where letters from Bishop Morlino appear). In fact, the story was featured because it will be significant for us as well. Bishop Morlino spoke to us priests about this while we together at Wisconsin Dells at the end of last month.

In the last couple of decades, Communion under both species (with the congregation able to receive the Pre-cious Blood as well as the Sacred Host) has become routine in our experience. I knew (as many of you do) that Communion under both species was first introduced, on a limited basis, after the Second Vatican Council, and that it has become much more common since. What I did not know was that the widespread American practice of offering both species at most Sunday Masses began here under an indult (special permission) given by the Vatican in 1975, which expired in 2005.  [Get that everyone?  The key points: it was a special permission to depart from the norm and that permission expired.]

Almost no one realized that until very recently. Maybe we can be
forgiven for forgetting that we were operating under a temporary
indult. After thirty years, something can seem pretty permanent. But it wasn’t. The bishops of our country did apply for an extension of the 1975 in-dult, but that was denied.

So, all over the United States, we now find ourselves needing to bring our practice into conformity with current regulations (and with the rest of the world). In his comments at Chula Vista, Bishop Morlino mentioned a few instances in which Communion under both kinds is still permitted: the Chrism Mass, the Feast of Corpus Christi, for the bride and groom at a Nuptial Mass, and for those so allergic to wheat that they cannot tolerate even low-gluten hosts. Beyond those occasions and circumstances, Communion can be offered under both species at celebrations of special importance. But it is clear that we will not be seeing Communion under both species as a weekly practice.

Bishop Morlino understands that this comes as news to all of us. He is giving pastors considerable latitude as to the timetable for implement-ing this change. He suggested that the beginning of Advent (when the new translation of the Missal is fully implemented) would be one plausible date to make the change. That will be our timetable here at the Cathedral Parish (and also at St. Paul’s University Catholic Center, the other parish clustered with us).

Msgr. Kevin D. Holmes

Times are changing.

WDTPRS kudos to Msgr. Holmes and to Bp. Morlino … again

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , , | 34 Comments

London Rosary Procession

Yesterday’s Rosary procession from Westminster Cathedral to the Brompton Oratory produced lots of prayers, or course, and lots of nice photos as well.  Here is a link to a flicker collection.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in Brick by Brick, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Perfect Priest

Our friends over at Rorate have a good post about priests, perception of priests, and the old Catch 22 they sometimes face.

It made me think of something an old chestnut of a chain letter which I have posted here before:

The Perfect Priest

The results of a computerized survey indicate the perfect priest preaches exactly fifteen minutes. He condemns sins but never upsets anyone. He works from 8:00 AM until midnight and is also a janitor. He makes $50 a week, wears good clothes, buys good books, drives a good car, and gives about $50 weekly to the poor. He is 28 years old and has preached 30 years. He has a burning desire to work with teenagers and spends all of his time with senior citizens.

The perfect priest smiles all the time with a straight face because he has a sense of humor that keeps him seriously dedicated to his work. He makes 15 calls daily on parish families, shut-ins and the hospitalized, and is always in his office when needed.

If your priest does not measure up, simply send this letter to six other churches that are tired of their priest, too. Then bundle up your priest and send him to the church on the top of the list. In one week, you will receive 1,643 priests and one of them will be perfect. Have faith in this procedure.

One parish broke the chain and got its old priest back in less than three weeks.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags:

Posted in Lighter fare, Linking Back | Tagged | 2 Comments

QUAERITUR: How to get people to stop doing Novus Ordo things in a TLM?

From a reader:

In my parish there is offered both the TLM or EF and the NO. Sometimes parishioners who almost exclusively attend the NO come to the TLM (which is a great thing, praise God and Vivat Papa!) . However, often these members of the faithful import customs from the NO, post particularly they approach the communion rail with arms folded and expect a blessing (which, because our holy priest is very charitable and not particularly traditional, they receive). They also sometimes insist on saying the Oratio Dominica [For people in Columbia Heights that's the Lord's Prayer.] with the priest and (I digress a little now) wear clothing that unfortunately is not out of place at a NO Mass, but is very much so – and even offensive, at a TLM.

Can I do anything to stop these things while exercising charity to stop these things which are distractions to me and other members of the faithful, and which Mother Church in her infinite wisdom does not deem part of a TLM?

Perhaps, friend, you need to worry about other things.

Three observations.

If the priest wants to give the blessings at Communion, that is not part of Mass but neither is it the end of the world.  We are in a time of transition.  I am also reminded of the parable in which some workers are resentful that others who didn’t work as long are getting a wage for a day.  But I digress….  Let the priest deal with these things, perhaps in sermons, announcements given during Mass, or bulletin notes.

About the Lord’s Prayer: Pope’s Pius IX and Pius XII indicated that the congregation could say the Lord’s Prayer together with the priest.  This was long in place before the 1962 Missale Romanum.  It is one aspect of participation at Mass from before the book we use for the Extraordinary Form you may not prefer it, but don’t say it has nothing to do with the Extraordinary Form.  It does.  I know that some people who prefer the TLM don’t like that.  Sorry. Again, let the priest guide the development of the local customs and application of the provisions of Summorum Pontificum.

Also, while somethings are distracting to you, other things are distracting to the new comers.  For example, not saying the Lord’s Prayer and not receiving a blessing, when all their lives they have been doing these things, is a matter of real distraction.

I would let things be and not worry about them too much.  Life is sometimes messy.  New blood coming to the parish is good.  People figuring out the lay of the land on their own without coercion and then changing their ways to fit in is a good thing.

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Drill | Tagged , | 37 Comments

Cleaning the bronze thing

The enormous bronze and brass thing menacing the stage of the Paul VI Audience Hall in Vatican City is going to be cleaned, etc.

I have a different solution.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
Posted in Lighter fare | 32 Comments

8 October 2011

WDTPRS 28th Ordinary Sunday: “our good works are a result of His grace”

Something to think about as we go into the weekend and your upcoming Sunday Mass.

COLLECT – (2002MR):
Tua nos, quaesumus, Domine, gratia
semper et praeveniat et sequatur,
ac bonis operibus iugiter praestet esse intentos
.

This dense little Collect was used for centuries on the Sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost (and still is by those enjoying the use of the 1962 Missale Romanum).  There is some true elegance in this prayer.  Latin word order can be quite flexible because of the inflection of the word endings.  The wide separation of tua and gratia in the first line is a good example of the figure of speech called hyperbaton: unusual word order to produce a dramatic effect.     The et… et construction is also quite effective.   This is a lovely prayer to sing aloud with the traditional tone for Collects.

That use of praeveniat…sequatur reminds me of a prayer I would hear at my parish during the Tuesday night devotions, including the Novena of Our Mother of Perpetual Help by St. Alphonsus Liguori (+1787).  It is often employed as a prayer for the sick:

“May the Lord Jesus Christ be with you that He may defend you, within you that He may sustain you, before you that He may lead you, behind you that He may protect you, above you that He may bless you. In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.”

LAME-DUCK ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):
Lord,
our help and guide,
make your love the foundation of our lives.
May our love for you express itself
in our eagerness to do good for others
.

This ICEL version, while probably a wonderful little prayer for use on a Catholic grade school playground, is appallingly bad as a translation for Mass.  Surely the new draft in preparation will be more accurate.

We need to examine some vocabulary.  The adjective intentus means “to stretch out or forth, extend” as well as “to strain or stretch towards, to extend.”  The action packed Lewis & Short Dictionary states that it also stands for, “to direct one’s thoughts or attention to.”  Latin has several particles that join parts of sentences and concepts together: et, – que, atque or (ac), etiam, and quoque.

These little words all basically mean “and” but they have their nuances.  But I won’t bother you with them at the moment.

Let’s nit-pick a little more.  Our Collect has both semper and iugiter.  The adverb semper is always “always” whereas iugiter (the adverbial form of iugis) means “always” in the sense of “continuously.”  Here is the reason.  A iugum is a “yoke”, like that which yokes together oxen.  Iugum, or in English “juger”, was also a Roman measure of land (28,800 square feet or 240 by 120 feet)   It was so-called probably because it was plowed by yoked oxen.  Morever, iugum was the name of the constellation we call Libra, the Latin word for a “scale, balance” which has a kind of yoke on it, and thus also for the Roman weight measure the “pound”.  This is why the English abbreviation for a pound is “lbs”!

The iugum was the infamous ancient symbol of defeat.  The Romans would force the vanquished to pass under a yoke to symbolize that they had been subjugated.  Variously, iugum also means a connection between mountains or the beam of a weaver’s loom or even the marriage bond.

Our adverb iugiter means “always” in a continuous sense probably because of the concept of yoking things together, bridging them, one after another in a unending chain.  We get this same word in the famous prayer written by St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274) used at Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament which is the Collect for Corpus Christi: “O God, who bequeathed to us a memorial of Thy Passion under a wondrous sacrament, grant, we implore, that we may venerate the sacred mysteries of Thy Body and Blood, in such a way as to sense within us constantly (iugiter) the fruit of Thy redemption.”  This is an appropriate citation of iugiter here at the end of our Year of the Eucharist.

SLAVISHLY LITERAL TRANSLATION:
We beg, O Lord, that Your grace
may always both go before and follow after us,
and hence continuously grant us to be intent upon good works
.

It is important not to get overly picky about particles in our translation work and exaggerate the nuances.  Their meanings are close enough that at times one word will be chosen over another by reason of its pleasing sound in this or that context.   Still, I think in our prayer today these conjunctions are important.  That et…et is a classic “both…and” construction, but our Collect has et…et…ac...   The et…et joins praeveniat and sequatur and then that pair of verbs is followed by an ac.  If that ac informs us that what follows is of greater importance than what precedes it, then our Collect has built into it a logical climax of ideas.  This is why I added a “hence” to my literal version.  Keep firmly in mind that tua gratia… “your grace” is the subject of all these verbs.  We want God, by means of grace, always to be both before and behind us.  We want that so that, by His grace always, we may be attentive to good works.  Even our good works are a result of His grace.

We know not either the day or hour when the King of Fearful Majesty will return to unmake our world in fire:

“But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a loud noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fire, and the earth and the works that are upon it will be burned up. Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of persons ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness, waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be kindled and dissolved, and the elements will melt with fire!” (2 Peter 3:10 RSV).

We must rely on God so absolutely that we do not fail in the vocations He has entrusted to us.  God has given us all something to do in this life.  If we attend to our work with real devotion He will give us every actual grace we need to accomplish our holy tasks.  Living and acting in this way and in the state of grace we merit, through Jesus Christ’s Sacrifice, to enjoy the happiness of the heaven for which we were made.  Good works must always be involved in this.

In our prayer we recognize that all good initiatives come from God beforehand.  Once we choose to embrace them and cooperate with Him in those initiatives, He is the one who ultimately brings them to completion.  He goes before, follows after, and is more present to us than we are to ourselves.  The only reason any of our good works have any merit for heaven is that God inspires them, informs them, and brings them to a good completion through us His knowing, willing, and loving servants.  The deeds are truly ours, of course, and therefore the reward for them is ours, but merit is God’s which He in love shares with us.

We see in today’s Collect how important our good works are and that they are all manifestations of God’s grace.  Just as we hope God will lavish His graces on us, so too ought we be generous with our good works.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in WDTPRS | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Exhibit on the historical inspiration for Capt. Jack Aubrey!

This is for your Just Too Cool folder. BBC reports:

Admiral Cochrane artefacts go on display for first time

The life of an admiral who inspired the character Jack Aubrey, portrayed in the film Master and Commander, is to form an exhibition in Edinburgh.

Novelist Patrick O’Brian partly based his 19th Century captain on the seafaring Scot, Thomas Cochrane.

The display charts Cochrane’s life, from growing up in Fife, to battling Napoleon’s Navy, from scandal and disgrace to becoming a Chilean hero.

Admiral Cochrane, the Real Master and Commander opens later.

The National Museum of Scotland exhibition includes objects that have never previously been on public display.

The artefacts include medals, trophies and personal mementos and a portrait of Cochrane by James Ramsay.

Personal objects connect the man with his remarkable story throughout the exhibition, from the pocket watch Cochrane was given by his father when he first went to sea to the Bosun’s Call silver whistle he kept as a souvenir from his naval service.

Dr Stuart Allan, senior curator at National Museums Scotland, said: “Cochrane’s story is as remarkable as any of the fictional exploits which he inspired and yet he remains a figure who is not widely remembered or recognised in Scotland.

“This exhibition aims to remedy that by giving people a unique chance to see first hand artefacts, documents and portraits from Cochrane’s lifetime.”

Curators said the exhibition reveals a “fiery character with difficulty accepting authority”.

It charts his rise from his first major exploit in capturing the Spanish frigate El Gamo in 1801 to one of his most notable achievements, the attack on the French fleet in the Basque Roads in 1809.

The exhibition also includes the Star of Bath, the Knighthood awarded to Cochrane for this action as well as graphic display charting the progress of the battle.

National hero

He became an MP after this but then dramatically lost his rank, seat and peerage after being controversially found guilty of a stock exchange fraud.

After his trial, he emigrated with his family to Chile, where he took command of their navy in the war of independence with Spain.

His successes led to his becoming a national hero in Chile, where he is remembered to this day.

Among the decorations and gifts on display is a sea chest presented by the people of Chile, inscribed ‘Soy de Cochrane’ (I belong to Cochrane).

This chapter of Cochrane’s career also inspired a central character in one of Bernard Cornwell’s Sharpe novels.

He was known by name to Napoleon, praised in verse by Sir Walter Scott, and Lord Byron said in 1821 “There is no man I envy so much as Lord Cochrane.”

If you are near Edinburgh don’t be a crackit gaberlunzie or a puir slow-witted gowk.  Go see the exhibit.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Crackit Gaberlunzie, Just Too Cool, O'Brian Tags, Puir Slow-Witted Gowk | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

QUAERITUR: Posture when tabernacle door is opened.

From a reader:

I have searched everywhere and I cannot find norms for what are the appropriate postures of the faithful when the tabernacle door is opened in Church, outside of Mass, for a communion call, etc… in a Church.

On one hand I have seen places where everyone goes about their business, no matter what proximity you are to the tabernacle. Only the minister offers revererence.

I have seen other places (rare) where the opening of the tabernacle door for a communion call was like exposition of the Eucharist, everyone in the Church was expected to stop and kneel until the Minister closed the door.

A third interpretion indicated special reverence was due only those in the Sanctuary at the time knelt, but all others continued moving in the Church, following the normal reverences designated for when the crossed in front of the tabernacle.

Where might I find the correct norms for this? I guess the last interp. seems most balanced since the mere attendance to sick is not a public act of worship, and are we to presume everytime the tabernacle doors are opened we in effect are engaged in an exposition of the Blessed Sacrament?

I don’t know if this has ever been described in the Church’s liturgical law.  However, I am pretty sure that the perennial practice is that when the door of the tabernacle is opened, people should stop what they are doing and kneel.

Consider the reverential awe Moses had for the God in the burning bush and glimpse through the cleft in the rock.  Consider the reverence shown the Ark of the Covenant and the Temple.  Consider Peter kneeling before the Lord and saying that he was just a sinner.  Consider Whom we have reserved in our tabernacles.

Yah… when the door is opened, get down on your knees, people!

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , | 13 Comments

Diocesan official says “I believe that blogging as currently manifested should be made a serious criminal offence”

My good friend Fr. Tim Finigan, His Hermeneuticalness, told me a puzzling tale.

Once upon a time, a man learned that the Holy See has stepped up its concern about the rise of Satanism and has stressed that all dioceses should have an appointed exorcist.  The man, whose interest was peaked, sent an email note to all the dioceses far and wide across the land actually having an email contact address – not all did, it seems – asking whether or not those dioceses had appointed exorcists.  Of the 21 dioceses he querried, 2 replied.  Of those 2 one refused to answer.   And it is the message sent with that refusal which is the object of my puzzlement.

Here now are some of the details.

The person who did the writing with the question is Richard Collins who has the blog Linen on the Hedgerow.

The diocesan official who wrote with a refusal to Mr. Collins is Fr Derek Turnham of Stokesley, North Yorkshire, which is the Diocese of Middlesbrough.  Fr. Turnham is a communications officer for the diocese.

This is what Fr. Turnham wrote to Mr. Collins:

Dear Richard

Thank you very much for kindly responding with the information about your research.

I am afraid that for personal ethical reasons I am not prepared to co-operate – I believe that blogging as currently manifested should be made a serious criminal office because of the significantly negative comments that are so often made about people who are trying to do their best are so destructive to the good of society.

I noticed that the website of Fr. Turnham’s diocese, Middlesbrough, is actually in a blog format.  CAFOD is the largest word in their tag cloud.

Okay.  I think we can all stipulate that some people using the Catholic blogosphere, for whatever reason – excess of zeal, perhaps, old scars, mischievousness, Asperger’s syndrome, rarely malice – write things which are better left unwritten.  But in the main the Catholic use of the blogosphere is quite fruitful.  Bloggers have responded well to the Church’s call to use better the new tools of social communication and they are getting better and better as they live and learn.

But Fr. Turnham seems to have some animus for bloggers.  Fr. Turnham, a former Anglican married Catholic priest, has been willing to speak to the BBC.  He wasn’t so reticent with The Tablet back in 1997.  So it is not as if Fr. Turnham doesn’t like to communicate.  Right?  On the other hand, maybe he doesn’t like the fact that blogs sometimes bring to light things people ought to know about.

What it is that Fr. Turnham finds so objectionable about blogs and bloggers that he would send such a hysterical answer to a layman who asked a reasonable question?

Perhaps the answer lies with Fr. Turnham’s desire for attention?

After all, he wrote that obnoxious and rather benighted response about blogging to a blogger.  Fr. Turnham, who probably knows something about communications – given that he is an official handing these matters for his diocese – must have known that his rude answer would be disseminated in the blogosphere.  Pretty obvious, right?

I can only conclude that Fr. Turnham wanted some attention.

And now he has some!

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , | 27 Comments

“Pro multis” in the the Misal Romano, Tercera Edición for the USA

From the September newsletter of the USCCB’s Committee on Divine Worship comes this blurb:

Use of Ustedes and the Spanish Translation of Pro Multis

In 2008, the USCCB petitioned the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments for permission to use “ustedes” and the corresponding verb constructions in place of “vosotros” for the Order of Mass, including the words of consecration of the bread and wine.  At that time, the USCCB also petitioned for the use of “por muchos” as the newly-approved translation of pro multis, to replace the wording “por todos los hombres.”  The Congregation granted recognitio for both of these changes in January 2009, but also stated that they would take effect only with the Misal Romano, Tercera Edición.  Since the USCCB has not yet approved a new Spanish translation of the Roman Missal, the official words of consecration in Spanish in the United States remain as in the current edition of the Misal Romano.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in WDTPRS | Tagged , | 10 Comments

A note to confessors about confessions and keeping your voices QUIET

I have had some encouraging email lately about people returning to the Sacrament of Penance after a long period.  This sort of news makes continuing this blog worth the labor.

Also, some people send concerns about the way the sacrament is celebrated where they are.  One concern I received today bears passing along.  One reader was concerned that perhaps the priest hearing confessions was in danger of violating the Seal of Confession by speaking too loudly and making it possible, inadvertantly of course, for people outside to hear what he, the priest, was saying.  This could indicate to people outside what sort of thing the penitent confessed.  Think about it: “Serial adultery is a serious problem. For your penance….”

Not good.

Fathers, keep your voices down.

Also, while being sensitive to people who are hard of hearing I will often ask penitents to lower their voices.

That said, Penitents, keep your voices down.

Confessionals are not always sound-proofed.

Finally, if you overhear someone’s confession of the confessor’s counsel, you are obliged to keep it secret.  Do not be talking about what you hear.  Ehvvvurrrr.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: , ,

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , | 29 Comments

An SSPX communique about their 7 Oct meeting

From the DICI site of the SSPX comes this:

On October 7, 2011, a meeting of all those in charge of the Society of St Pius X was held in Albano, Italy, during which the Superior General, H. E. Bishop Bernard Fellay, presented the content of the Doctrinal Preamble, handed over to him by Cardinal William Levada, Prefect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, at the Vatican, during last September 14 meeting.

During this day, the twenty-eight persons in charge of the Society of St Pius X present at the meeting – seminary rectors, district superiors from all over the world – manifested a profound unity in their will to maintain the Faith in its integrity and its fullness, faithful to the lesson which Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre left them, according to St Paul’s “Tradidi quod et accepi – I have handed over what I myself have received” (I Cor 15:3).

Following this work meeting, the study of the Doctrinal Preamble – of which the content still remains confidential – will be pursued and further analysed at the level of the General Counsel of the Society of St Pius X, by the Superior General and his two Assistants, Frs. Niklaus Pfluger and Alain Nely, enabling them to present an answer to the Roman proposals in a reasonable time.
Albano, October 7, 2011

You decide.

EMAIL, PRINT, or otherwise SHARE:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites

Technorati Tags: ,

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , | 34 Comments