September 18, 2011

This is the other side of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation's ongoing efforts to compel the West to criminalize "defamation of religion" -- that is, realistic and truthful portrayals of Islam. Once the foolish kuffar has done that, then this other shoe will eventually drop.

Islamic Tolerance Alert: "Religious Unity Regulation prohibits preaching a religion except Islam," from Haveeru Online, September 17 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

MALE, September 17 (HNS) – President’s Office has gazetted the controversial Religious Unity Regulation, declaring it an offence to preach a religion except Islam in the Maldives.

The 12-clause regulation makes it mandatory for preachers of Islam, both locals and foreigners, to have a first degree in a field of Islamic education from a ministry-approved college, university or centre....

The regulation, which instructs scholars to consider the social harmony, states practices that should be avoided in preaching Islam in the Maldives, including the practice of making comments in contradiction with prophetic traditions and majority view of the scholars....

The regulation also prohibits comments of hatred towards people of other religions, spreading a religion other than Islam and using an object that resembles a sign of a religion other than Islam.

A person who violates the regulation will be sentenced to 2-5 years in prison, banishment or house arrest.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The jihadis in Pakistan are relentless in their determination to make everyone too terrified to oppose them. After all, Muhammad said, "I have been made victorious through terror" (Bukhari 4.52.220)

"Pakistani Taliban vow to attack weddings and funerals of their enemies," by Nasir Habib for CNN, September 16 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Islamabad, Pakistan (CNN) -- The Pakistani Taliban declared Friday they will target the weddings and funerals of anyone involved in pro-government activity against them.

The threat came as the Taliban claimed responsibility for Thursday's suicide blast targeting a funeral procession for a member of an anti-Taliban militia.

"Anyone who supports the U.S. and Pakistani military will face the same fate," Taliban spokesman Siraj-ud Din said. "We will target funeral processions and wedding ceremonies of those who support the U.S."...

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Pakistanis were not happy when the Secretary of Defense criticized their failure to take on the Haqqani network. They really won't like this, an exceptionally frank allegation from the ambassador.

"U.S. links Pakistan to group it blames for Kabul attack," by Qasim Nauman for Reuters, September 17:

Islamabad (Reuters) - The United States accused Pakistan on Saturday of having links to a militant group Washington blames for an attack on the U.S. embassy and other targets in Kabul and said the government in Islamabad must cut those ties. "The attack that took place in Kabul a few days ago, that was the work of the Haqqani network," the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, Cameron Munter, told Radio Pakistan in comments aired on Saturday.
"There is evidence linking the Haqqani Network to the Pakistan government. This is something that must stop."

The Haqqani Network. Reach out and bomb someone.

The Haqqani network is one of three, and perhaps the most feared, of the Taliban allied insurgent factions fighting U.S.-led NATO and Afghan troops in Afghanistan.
Insurgents in a bomb-laden truck occupied a building in Kabul on Tuesday, raining rockets and gunfire on the U.S. embassy and other targets in the diplomatic quarter of the Afghan capital, and battled police during a 20 hour siege.
Five Afghan police and 11 civilians were killed.
Washington has long blamed militants sheltering in Pakistan for violence in Afghanistan. Islamabad says its forces are taking high casualties fighting insurgents, and bristles at any suggestion it provides support for fighters.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned Pakistan on Wednesday the United States would "do everything we can" to defend U.S. forces from Pakistan-based militants staging attacks in Afghanistan.
Munter suggested ties with Pakistan, which relies heavily on billions of dollars of U.S. aid, were still heavily strained, despite recent comments from both sides on strong counter-terrorism cooperation.
"These relations today need a lot of work," he said.
The Haqqani network is perhaps the most divisive issue between the two allies, whose ties have been badly damaged by the unilateral American raid that killed Osama bin Laden in a Pakistani town in May.
Pakistani officials were not immediately available for reaction on Munter's comments.
"The key here is that this is going to take a real effort to work together, to agree who the enemy is, to make sure that we identify those people who will attack Pakistanis, Afghans, and Americans, that we do not give them any space anywhere," Munter told Radio Pakistan.
"These people have to be pursued everywhere. We will work with our Pakistani friends to make that happen but we cannot put up with this kind of fight. We have to make sure that in our talks with your leadership, we figure out the best way to put these attacks to an end."
The United States has repeatedly pressed Pakistan to go after the network, which it believes is one of the most lethal organizations in Afghanistan and enjoys sanctuaries in North Waziristan, a global hub for militants near the Afghan border.
Pakistan's powerful Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) has long been suspected of maintaining ties to the Haqqani network, cultivated during the 1980s when its founder Jalaluddin Haqqani was a feared battlefield commander against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.
Asked if the Haqqani network was behind the Kabul assault, Sirajuddin Haqqani, the group's leader, told Reuters in a telephone interview on Saturday from an undisclosed location:
"For some reasons, I would not like to claim that fighters of our group had carried out the recent attack on U.S. embassy and NATO headquarters. Our central leadership, particularly senior members of the shura, suggested I should keep quiet in future if the US and its allies suffer in future."
The Haqqanis are thought to have introduced suicide bombing to Afghanistan, and are believed to have been behind high-profile attacks there, including a raid on Kabul's top hotel and an assassination attempt on the president....
| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Overseas terrorist groups. Let's see... have the Mary Kay Commandos made it to Helsinki?

No, this case appears to involve the Somali jihadist group al-Shabaab. "Finland terror suspects are Somalis: report," from Gulf Times, September 18:

Two people arrested in Helsinki on suspicion of funding terrorism and recruitment had foreign links but planned no attacks in Finland, police and intelligence officials said yesterday.
The daily Ilta-Sanomat earlier quoted unidentified police sources as saying the two were Finnish citizens of Somali origin.
“The case we are investigating is one of support, not a terrorist act as such,” Olli Kolstela of the Supo intelligence service told a press conference, adding that there was “no cause for concern in Finland.”
The head of the police investigation, Kaj-Erik Bjoerkqvist, said the two, a man and a woman, were of foreign origin and had links with overseas organisations, but declined to give details.
He said the police were investigating a number of people but only two had been arrested.
Supo said the inquiry had begun in 2009 following a routine police check. The pair was arrested on September 7, triggering searches of homes and other locations in the capital, police said.
In January, Finnish intelligence said it was keeping an eye on “several dozen” inhabitants of the Nordic country with contacts with the radical Shebab Islamist group in Somalia.
Earlier this month police in neighbouring Sweden arrested four people with reported links to the Shebaab on suspicion of planning an attack in the city of Gothenburg.
A count of terrorism against the four has since been withdrawn, but they still face charges of planning murder.
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No one was buying it before. No one is buying it now. The Bishop of Islamabad has called the most recent police statement "absurd."

Briefly, Pakistani authorities had at least seemed to be trying to look busy, but they are simply moving the plot along in their revised version of the circumstances of Shahbaz Bhatti's assassination. To change the official story is to attempt to kill him twice, attempting to bury the public memory of him as having died unjustly for a just cause: defending the rights of religious minorities in Pakistan, and demanding justice for the victims of the country's blasphemy laws.

Authorities would like the discussion of both of those issues, and of Bhatti, to go away. "Assassination of Shahbaz Bhatti: new falsehoods from the police," by Jibran Khan for Asia News, September 17:

Islamabad (AsiaNews) – Pakistani police are spreading new falsehoods and new doubts about the assassination of Shahbaz Bhatti, the Catholic Minister for Minorities, killed last March 2 by a group of Muslim extremists. Bhatti had long led a fight against the death sentence of Asia Bibi for blasphemy and in defense of religious minorities in his country.
According to the police in Islamabad, the two suspects in the killing, Zia-ur-Rehman and Malik Abid, would be two ex-Christians from Faisalabad, converted to Islam, who allegedly have a property dispute with the Bhatti family. The police have also stated that there is no evidence against them.
This is the second time that police have attempted what is being called a "cover-up". In August, some Pakistani media reported police statements according to which Shahbaz Bhatti would have been killed over "family disputes" related to some property
Later, the Court of Counterterrorism issued an international arrest warrant against Zia-ur-Rehman and Malik Abid, who after the assassination would have fled to Dubai.
In recent days, the two have been transferred to Pakistan, thanks to Interpol. The Senior Superintendent of Police Operations and the head of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT), however, said that "the suspects are being detained for investigating, they both were allegedly nominated by the Bhatti family, yet it would be too early to comment on their involvement in Bhatti's assassination as there is no evidence available about their involvement. They are being detained on the basis of doubt, things will get clear once they are interrogated."
The statements of the police provoked strong reactions and criticism in the Church of Pakistan. Mons. Rufin Anthony, Bishop of Islamabad and a personal friend of Shahbaz Bhatti told AsiaNews that "the statement by the police is totally absurd."
"If they are not sure about the involvement of the suspects", he added, "then what are they suspecting them for? Why did the court issue the warrants if the JIT didn't have any evidence about their involvement?"
For the bishop, there is a suspicion that "the police are defending the culprits, or diverting the direction of the case, arresting some so-called suspects and then gets them released, on the basis of the non-availability of solid evidence for their involvement”. "It is clear", he continued, "that if there is no evidence against the two suspects, they will be released by the court."
To Mons. Anthony, it is urgent to set up a serious inquiry committee. "It is about time that the concerned authorities start taking things seriously: as Shahbaz Bhatti's assassination is not only the assassination of a Federal Minister, it is the assassination of the voice of the voiceless. They have silenced a man, but can never silence his vision, his thoughts and his struggle for the marginalized".
The prelate's opinion is also shared by Muslim personalities. An academic Muslim cleric, Maulana Mahfooz Khan, also comments on the police statements: "They are just to divert the direction of the case. How can a vehicle [that of the murderers] disappear from the Federal Capital, where there are security checkpoints on all the entry and exits? Every citizen is stopped and questioned at every security checkpoint, how can a vehicle filled with armed men escape un-noticed by the authorities?"
Mahfooz Khan agrees that a new judicial commission is urgent. "The Government", he adds, "seems reluctant in taking interest in the assassination of their own Federal Minister, who was slain in broad daylight in Islamabad."
"Shahbaz Bhatti", he concludes, "fought for the rights of minorities; his struggle for the interfaith harmony is remarkable."
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An update on this story. It now appears Iran may attempt to arrange a swap for Iranians in U.S. custody. "Iran: Court to commute sentences for 2 Americans," by Ali Akbar Dareini for the Associated Press, September 17:

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's foreign minister said Saturday that the courts are willing in "the near future" to commute the prison sentences for two Americans convicted of spying. The Americans' lawyer, meanwhile, was in court trying to arrange a $1 million bail-for-freedom deal.
The release rests in the hands of the hard-line judiciary, and Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi gave no clear timetable. He also raised the issue of Iranians held in U.S. prisons, suggesting the Americans' release might be drawn out to bring attention to inmates Iran wants freed.

Predictable.

In a case that has added to the acrimony and deep distrust between Iran and the U.S., Shane Bauer and Josh Fattal, both 29, were detained along the Iran-Iraq border in July 2009 with their friend Sarah Shourd. Shourd was released last September with mediation by the Gulf nation of Oman after $500,000 was paid.
The two men were convicted of illegally entering Iran and spying for the United States, and were sentenced to a total of eight years in prison each.
They denied the charges and appealed the verdicts, opening the way for the possible deal to free them in exchange for $500,000 bail each.
Salehi said at a news conference that Iran's judiciary was ready to commute the sentences as a gesture of Islamic mercy. But he did not give any clearer indication of when they could be released.
"The judiciary's decision is to commute (the Americans') punishment," the foreign minister said. "We expect the judiciary to make its decision in the near future."
"We hope this issue will be finalized so that both families of Iranians who are waiting (for inmates in U.S. prisons) as well as the families of these U.S. nationals will, God willing, hear good news," Salehi said.
He did not specifically mention any Iranian detainee, although officials in Tehran have often complained about alleged mistreatment of Iranians in American custody....
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

September 17, 2011

Earlier on Pajamas Media (via RaymondIbrahim.com) I discussed how Ron Paul appears to be ignorant and naïve when it comes to the goals of the jihad: ignorant because his statements are not based on accurate knowledge and naïve because he thinks they are – more to the point, because he takes al-Qaeda's propaganda at face value:

Among other qualities, a good presidential candidate must be knowledgeable and able to think outside the box; equally important, he must not be naïve or gullible — certainly not swallow everything the enemy says hook, line, and sinker.

During the recent Republican candidate debate, Congressman Ron Paul exhibited his ignorance and gullibility when the panel was asked "Do you plan to decrease Defense spending, to balance spending, or do you believe high spending is essential to security?"

After Paul explained how he was "tired of all the militarism that we are involved in," and his plan on cutting back, he said, "But we're under great threat, because we occupy so many countries…. The purpose of al Qaeda was to attack us, invite us over there, where they can target us…. but we're there occupying their land. And if we think that we can do that and not have retaliation, we're kidding ourselves."

This is, of course, an old and well known narrative.

By questioning Paul, however, Rick Santorum exposed the latter's problematic foreign policy approach:

On your [Paul's] Web site on 9/11, you had a blog post that basically blamed the United States for 9/11. On your Web site, yesterday, you said that it was our actions that brought about the actions of 9/11. Now, Congressman Paul, that is irresponsible. The president of the United States — someone who is running for the president of the United States in the Republican Party should not be parroting what Osama bin Laden said on 9/11. We should have — we are not being attacked and we were not attacked because of our actions. We were attacked, as Newt [Gingrich] talked about, because we have a civilization that is antithetical to the civilization of the jihadists [full transcript here].

After rejecting Santorum's thesis, Paul made his fatal blunder:

Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda have been explicit — they have been explicit, and they wrote and said that we attacked America because you had bases on our holy land in Saudi Arabia, you do not give Palestinians fair treatment, and you have been bombing – [audience booing] I didn't say that. I'm trying to get you to understand what the motive was behind the bombing.

This exchange clearly revealed Paul's lack of knowledge concerning the nature of the enemy. It's one thing for some Americans to believe that the source of all conflict is the United State's presence in some countries, it's quite another for a potential president to think, and speak, this way.

Ironically, Paul even contradicted himself: minutes earlier, when discussing the need to cut back on the military, he complained that we had a military presence in 130 countries — bringing to mind the question: if U.S. military presence is the source of problems, why haven't these countries lashed out?

But what's worse is Paul's naivety — that he would actually swallow and regurgitate verbatim the propaganda al-Qaeda has been dishing for years, to wit, "Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda have been explicit — they have been explicit, and they wrote and said"; and "I'm trying to get you to understand what the motive was behind the bombing."

Did it ever occur to the Congressman that al-Qaeda could be, um, lying?...

Read the rest.

| 48 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Surely we'll be told this has all been taken out of context, though the death penalty for apostasy from Islam comes from Muhammad's own orders (Sahih Bukhari 9.84.57). Surely we'll be told that has been taken out of context as well, though we're not the believing Muslims who have continue to act on those orders and to command others to do so. We just call attention to reports of it.

Funny how that keeps happening. "Converts must die: imam to Swedish radio," from The Local, September 15:

Swedish public service broadcaster Sveriges Radio (SR) has been reported for hate speech after featuring a programme in which a Somali imam called for all converts from Islam to be killed.
The programme in question was a panel discussion and was broadcast live by SR International's Somali service.
The police report was filed by Erik Johansson, at the Swedish Evangelical Mission (Evangeliska Fosterlands-Stiftelsen - EFS), after friends told him of the imam's words underlining every Muslim's responsibility to kill anyone who leaves Islam.
"I received a call from my Somali friends who had heard the programme. I don't speak the language myself and when they explained to me, I concluded that this wasn't a message which should be on an SR channel," Erik Johansson told The Local on Thursday.
Johansson also contacted Sveriges Radio in order to register his dismay that the item was left available on their website for more than two weeks. Soon after his telephone call the programme was removed from the website.
In a comment to the Christian website Dagen on Tuesday, SR International head Ingemar Löfgren said that he decided to pull the transcript from SR's website pending receipt of an official translation, pointing out that he is responsible for several channels broadcast in languages which he does not speak.
"If an imam calls for other Muslims to kill converts, then we have a journalistic responsibility... If he didn't get any follow up questions then we have failed in our journalistic responsibility," he said.
According to Erik Johansson, the journalist reminded the imam that they were in Sweden, to which he replied that the same rules apply there.
"It is my hope my police report will encourage them (SR) to change their routines," Erik Johansson told The Local.
The Local's attempts to reach Sveriges Radio International for comment on Thursday have so far been unsuccessful.
| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
And bear in mind that one of those Malaysians who was killed just on the other side of the border yesterday in 'restive' (i.e. jihad afflicted) southern Thailand was a three year old. So, where's the public outrage and indignation? If Muslims, I mean we Malaysians, can get angry enough to protest in the streets about cartoons that supposedly insult Islam's 'prophet', or about supporting Hamas and Hamas-ruled Gaza, or supporting yet another terrorist outfit in Sri Lanka, then where's the anger in this case? Perhaps a child getting blown up by Muslim terrorists is not enough of a clear-cut atrocity for Malaysians to get riled up about?

Muslims may be quick to anger, but what they're getting angry at depends on a number of variables. If any Muslim, or Islam, is in any way conceivably insulted or slighted in the slightest by non Muslims, well it's time to roll out the vaguely-threatening public statements, street demonstrations, or worse. If someone has been killed, then the 'value' of the death depends on who's been killed and who's the killer, or who can be plausibly made out to be the killer. As we'll see in the case of the dead Malaysians in Thailand, who are of Chinese descent, a dead 'infidel' at the hands of Muslims has no value. Hence this tragedy will hold no interest to Muslims. As far as Malaysians are concerned, officially or unofficially, Muslims are largely blameless and Islam is entirely blameless for violence of any sort. All facts which undermine these long-cherished notions are studiously ignored.

On the other hand, if the deaths of Muslims can be plausibly (or even implausibly) laid at the hands of infidels, in particular America or Israel, then out come the daggers and the calls for blood to be spilled -- both here in Malaysia and anywhere else Muslims happen to reside.

Lest we infidels forget, this is worth repeating: Islam equals hypocrisy par excellence.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An update on this story. Predictably, even though Maen Rashid Areikat made these same comments last year, he is now said to have been misquoted, and as reported below, he wants USA Today to "reverse the story."

Perhaps the PA realized that ambassador's calls for "total separation" of Jews and Muslims at the outset of a Palestinian state could damage the future prospects for the train wreck known as the "right of return," an attempted demographic conquest in waiting.

Perhaps also, they realized the double standard the ambassador articulated was a little too frank for the present moment, seeing as Israeli Arabs live as regular citizens of the Jewish state. "Palestinian officials: Jews welcome," by Josh Gerstein and MJ Lee for Politico, September 16:

Palestinian officials are rolling out the welcome mat for Jews to come to a new Palestinian state.
Trying to tamp down a controversy over whether a Palestinian state would be Jew-free, Mahmoud Habbash, the Palestinian minister of religious affairs, said a future state would be open to people of all religions, including Jews.
“The future Palestinian state will be open to all its citizens, regardless of their religion,” Habbash said, according to USA Today. “We want a civil state, which in it live all the faiths, Muslim, Christian and Jews also if they agree, (and) accept to be Palestinian citizens.”
Maen Areikat, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s ambassador to the United States, told POLITICO that his comments earlier this week which some interpreted as meaning Jews would not be welcome were misconstrued.
“In no way was there a suggestion that Jews cannot enter Palestine or be in Palestinian state in the future,” Areikat said.
The officials’ comments follow a controversy the ambassador’s remarks at a breakfast on Tuesday hosted by the Christian Science Monitor in which he said that Jews and Palestinians “need to be totally separated.”
USA Today reported that Areikat was calling for the future Palestinian state to “free of Jews.”
Areikat told POLITICO that was a “total fabrication” and he said the report was a “malicious” manipulation of what he had said.
“It was a set-up to try to say something on my behalf I didn’t even say I did not mention the word Jews in my answer. I did not allude to that at all,” Areikat said. “We have never said this is a religious conflict.”
He added that the report was “so inflammatory” that he is requesting a meeting with an editor at USA Today there to “reverse the story.”...
| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Police dispersed them, and that should have been the end of the story, but it is not. Rather, "talks took place with the governor and they have been invited to make an official request to the faith ministry."

This has occurred in the "new" Tunisia. The modern, moderate, secular Tunisia. The transitional regime has rewarded this behavior by dignifying it with the response of talks with the governor and the "invitation" to make a "request." Behavior that is rewarded is likely to be repeated.

"Muslims Bid To Turn Christian Site Into Mosque," from Agence France-Presse, September 16:

TUNIS, Sept 16, (AFP): A group of Salafist Muslims took over a Christian basilica in the Tunisian town of Kef with the aim of turning it into a mosque, media reported Friday.

Familiar revisionist claims:

The daily La Presse newspaper said police dispersed about 20 people from the Roman site, who argued that it was a place of Muslim worship before it reverted to a basilica in 1966.
“Muslims went into the basilica to prepare the place for Friday prayers,” interior ministry spokesman Hichem Meddeb told AFP, adding that he was not able to confirm they were Salafists.

It's been done. It has been done innumerable times before to churches small and great, including the Church of St. John the Baptist in Damascus to the Hagia Sophia. Commandeering non-Muslims' sacred sites has long been an expression of supremacism, a gesture of domination over the area, and a weapon of psychological warfare.

“Police dispersed them without any trouble, talks took place with the governor and they have been invited to make an official request to the faith ministry,” he said. “As things stand, the monument remains a basilica.”
Meanwhile, Tunisian political parties agreed Thursday on a roadmap for the country’s transition to democracy, planning for parliamentary elections in just over a year – a relatively short timeline designed to prevent further instability.
The declaration signed by the 12 main parties of the transition commission comes after a heated debate over how quickly the country would move on to writing a constitution and forming a permanent government after the Oct. 25 election of a constitutional assembly.
“This is an historic moment, despite our differences,” said Maya Jribi, the chairman of the centrist Progressive Democratic Party, one of the more influential political groups.
Tunisians sparked off the unprecedented wave of pro-democracy uprisings across the Arab world by overthrowing their long-serving dictator in January. With a small, largely educated and homogenous population, Tunisia is believed to have the best chance of becoming a prosperous democracy.

In all likelihood, they will declare themselves an Islamic republic and so install a constitutional ticking time bomb and perpetual source of instability over how much Sharia in government is "enough." Someone will always want more and be willing to kill and overthrow governments for it.

Although the country has been wracked by unrest for much of this year, Tunisians have opted to take a gradual road to democracy by first electing a body to write a new constitution to determine their future political system.
Thursday’s declaration gives the new assembly just a year to write the constitution and hold parliamentary elections so as to minimize the chance for further instability, participants said.
Also signing the document was the powerful Islamist Ennahda Party, which had previously left the transition commission after quarreling with the other parties. In a recent poll at least 20 percent of Tunisians said they would vote for Ennahda, double amount for the next most popular party, the PDP.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Just one question: Why? "Pakistan Passes Obama's 'Religious Freedom' Test—After Sentencing Christian to Death," by Terrence P. Jeffrey for CNS News, September 16:

(CNSNews.com) - Pakistan, which has issued a death sentence to a Christian mother of five for allegedly blaspheming the prophet Mohammed, and which regularly prosecutes Christians for allegedly blaspheming Islam, has passed the religious freedom test imposed by the Obama administration.

The woman mentioned above is Asia Bibi, whose name every official on Capitol Hill ought to know.

When Secretary of State Hillary Clinton released the U.S. government's Annual Report on International Religious Freedom this week, Pakistan was not listed among the so-called “Countries of Particular Concern”
“Secretary Clinton designated eight countries as CPCs: Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Uzbekistan,” said the report. “The Secretary applied CPC sanctions to six of these: Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, and Sudan.”
As U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom Suzan Johnson Cook pointed out on Tuesday when Clinton released the religious freedom report, the International Religious Freedom Act “calls on the U.S. government to designate the worst violators of religious freedom as Countries of Particular Concern or 'CPCs.'"
“The President's authority to designate CPCs has been delegated to the Secretary of State,” Cook said.
Clinton did not designate Pakistan even though the State Department’s own report stated that Pakistani law calls for the death penalty for people who commit “blasphemy” against Islam or who convert from Islam to another religion--and even though the report listed multiple instances of the Pakistani government using the law to persecute Christians.
“The [Pakistani] constitution and other laws and policies restricted religious freedom and, in practice, the government enforces these restrictions,” says the State Department report.
“Freedom of speech was subject to ‘reasonable’ restrictions in the interest of the ‘glory of Islam,’ as stipulated in sections 295(a), (b), and © of the penal code,” says the report.
“The consequences of contravening the country’s blasphemy laws were death for defiling Islam or the prophets; life imprisonment for defiling, damaging, or desecrating the Qur’an; and 10 years imprisonment for insulting ‘another’s religious feelings,’” says the report.
Christians are the top target of these Pakistani laws. “Laws prohibiting blasphemy continued to be used against Christians,” says the State Department report.
In the latter half of 2010, the report says, 24 blasphemy cases were registered in Pakistani courts. Ten were brought against Christians, seven against Hindus, three against Ahmadis and only four against Muslims.
Also, according to the State Department, the government schools in Pakistan denigrate members of non-Muslim religions, including Jews....
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Somehow he doesn't see the uprisings as a flowering of Western-style democracy and pluralism. Perhaps Nicholas Kristof or Reza Aslan should jet over to Tehran and straighten this guy out. "Cleric: Regional Nations Seeking to Revive Islam, Religious Populism," from the Fars News Agency, September 16:

TEHRAN (FNA)- Tehran's provisional Friday Prayers Leader Ayatollah Seyed Ahmad Khatami underlined the Islamic nature of the current popular uprisings in the region, and added that the regional nations are in pursuit of "Islamic values and religious populism".

Addressing a large congregation of worshipers on Tehran University Campus today, Ayatollah Khatami pointed to the outcomes of the waves of Islamic awakening in the region, and stressed that the US that once sought to create the Greater Middle-East for the Zionist regime is now facing growing humility and disgrace.

"Among the other outcomes of the Islamic awakening is this official declaration of the revolutionary people that they want Islam and religious populism," Ayatollah Khatami noted.

"And this is what the arrogance (the US) has been and is much worried about," he continued.

He also said that popular uprisings also have this message for the other regional nations that they too can come to the scene and end (the life of) the Zionist regime once and for all....

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
The never-ending body count of Islam's jihad has racked up three more innocent lives -- in this case, three Malaysians (including a three-year old child) who were visiting a border town just across the border in southern Thailand have been killed in a bombing. As this information comes from a Malaysian newspaper account of the tragedy, there will of course be no mention of the identity of the Muslim perpetrators who almost certainly did the murderous deed, nor will there be any mention of the cause of Islamic supremacy in which this and many other wanton acts of violence have been carried out. This is merely the latest in a very long line of atrocities and cold-blooded murder which has been committed by Muslims in southern Thailand for many years in their attempt to carve a Shariah-ruled Muslim state out of southern Thailand. From "Child among three [Malaysians] killed in Golok blasts", The Star, 17 September 2011:

SUNGAI GOLOK (Southern Thailand): Three Malaysians, including a child, were killed and at least 50 others injured after three bombs exploded in this popular border town.

The blasts occurred along Jalan Cheroen Ket, a popular nightlife haunt, near a hotel and a cultural centre. The first blast took place at 7.30pm Friday (Malaysian time), according to residents.

Sungai Golok deputy mayor Rusdi Che Omar on Saturday said police identified the dead as Foong Foo Keah, 45, from Kuantan, Pahang, Wong Hong Yep, 63 and his three-year-old grandson Wong Kai Sien, both from Jalan Hamzah, Kota Baru.

A Thai national, an unidentified 38-year-old volunteer worker, was also killed in the blasts.

Wong and his grandson arrived here with friends on Thursday to do some shopping.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This morning the New York Times has picked up on the effort by the hard Left and Islamic supremacist groups to intimidate the FBI into abandoning all attempts to teach the truth about Islam and jihad, which I wrote about at length yesterday here. The agenda of Hamas-linked CAIR is obvious in their outrage over FBI training materials: they want the Feds to stop teaching the truth about Islam, and to supply agents only with a whitewashed, misleading picture that will leave them woefully ill-equipped to understand or deal adequately with jihad terror plotting in the U.S. The Leftist media, including now the New York Times, with its usual suicidal short-sightedness and fashionable anti-anti-terror stance, has eagerly signed on to this campaign.

Here is one section from the Times' piece on this today: "F.B.I. Chided for Training That Was Critical of Islam," by Erica Goode in the New York Times, September 16:

The agency was also criticized last year for inviting Robert Spencer, an anti-Muslim blogger, to speak to a joint terrorism task force.

“This isn’t a revelation to us,” said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an advocacy group in Washington. “We’ve been dealing with this issue for quite some time now.”

He added, “There’s a problem with the use of anti-Islamic trainers and Islamophobic materials.”

I wrote this to Erica Goode:

I am not "anti-Muslim," as I have stated many times. It is not "anti-Muslim" to stand for human rights for all people, including Muslims, and to defend the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and equality of rights for women, all of which are denied under traditional forms of Sharia. Nor am I merely a blogger, but the author of 10 books, two of which were New York Times bestsellers. Nor is CAIR simply a neutral Muslim advocacy group, but a Hamas/Muslim Brotherhood-linked group with many former officials convicted of terror plotting. I hope next time you write about this you will attempt at least some semblance of objective journalism, but I have no high hopes.

Robert Spencer

Like Spencer Ackerman, Erica Goode makes no attempt to determine whether or not the material in the FBI training is true or accurate. She just takes for granted that it must be false (I show that it is true here), and assumes also that Hamas-linked CAIR and the ADC are the honest brokers in this controversy. It is typical, but no less excusable for that.

UPDATE 12:05PM Saturday 9/17: I just received this email from Erica Goode:

Dear Mr. Spencer, Thanks for your email. We are changing the sentence online to read "a blogger and author widely perceived as hostile to Islam." CAIR is defined in the piece as an advocacy group. Best wishes, Erica Goode

I responded:

Dear Ms. Goode,

I much appreciate the change, although it is factually inaccurate: I am not hostile to Islam. I am hostile to the oppression of women, and to the denial of the freedom of speech and the freedom of conscience. Aren't you? The idea that I am hostile to Islam because I tell the truth about its teachings is part of an OIC-led effort by Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups like CAIR to squelch any honest discussion of how Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and recruit and motivate terrorists. I think the goal of such an effort is obvious. Meanwhile, regarding CAIR as an advocacy group, would you also characterize the KKK or the Aryan Nations as an advocacy group?

Thanks for your note.
RS

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

We have not had an update on Asia Bibi in a while, but she remains in a Pakistani prison, unjustly sentenced to death for blasphemy charges brought in retribution for her defending her Christian beliefs and refusing to convert to Islam. The law is inherently abusive, and only lends itself to further abuses.

Barack Obama should know the name of Asia Bibi. Every member of Congress should know her name. Every prospective presidential candidate should know her name. Her case is emblematic of all that is wrong with our "friend and ally" Pakistan. Future aid to Pakistan should be tied to her release, along with all similar prisoners of conscience, with substantive pressure applied to Pakistan to secure the release of all captive women and girls forced to convert to Islam -- a "common practice," according to the Bishop of Islamabad.

"ASIA/PAKISTAN - Asia Bibi was sentenced to death by a court "influenced by Islamic extremists' and 'without a lawyer'," from Agenzia Fides, September 15:

Lahore (Agenzia Fides) - There is more than a shadow on the case of Asia Bibi, a 40-year old Christian woman, who was sentenced to death for blasphemy. Asia was judged by a court "under the obvious pressure of Islamic extremists", and "for personal vendetta". In addition there is an obvious procedural irregularity: during the investigations and preliminary interrogations, conducted by the police after the complaint, Asia did not have a lawyer: for this reason the whole trial could be invalidated. This is what is stated in a note sent to Fides by the influential Muslim study Centre "Jinnah Institute" in Karachi. Named after the founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the institute is a "think tank" composed of Muslim intellectuals and chaired by the parliamentary Sherry Rehman. She carries out her research in the field of law, human rights, rule of law and promotes the establishment of a democratic and secular Pakistan, as desired by Ali Jinnah.
The note by the "Jinnah Institute" on Asia Bibi brings attention to the case of the woman who for over a year languishes in the prisons in Sheikhupura in Punjab. Even Pope Benedict XVI launched an appeal for her release in November 2010. The lawyer, now guaranteed by the "Masihi Foundation" - who has taken charge of her case - is preparing the application for appeal to the High Court, but there is also the possibility of presidential forgiveness. Her story is behind the murders of Salman Taseer, Governor of Punjab, and Shabhaz Bhatti, federal Minister for religious minorities, who had defended her.

The government subsequently tried to rewrite the official story on the circumstances of Bhatti's murder, but appears to have backtracked for the moment, because no one was buying it.

The Jinnah Institute reports that from the outset, Asia Bibi’s court case was marred by irregularities and manipulations. The "National Commission on the Status of Women", after a meeting with Asia Bibi in jail, found that "only 8 days after the alleged incident - in which Asia pronounced blasphemous sentences - Qari Muhammad Salim, a local Muslim religious leader, using three women as witnesses, was able to register an official First Information Report FIR on the basis of which Asia was arrested". During the 8 days allegations against Asia had been orchestrated. These suspicious circumstances - note the Jinnah Institute - are described in the Report written by Shabhaz Bhatti and Salman Taseer and delivered to the President of Pakistan, Ali Zardari. The Report highlights that "the judge sentenced her due to pressures by Islamic extremists, ignoring the true facts".
These pressures are deleterious to the system, notes The Jinnah Institute, recalling the murder of the Lahore High Court judge, Arif Iqbal Bhatti, who was killed in 1997 when he issued an acquittal towards two Christian boys, Salamat and Rehmat Masih, sentenced to death for blasphemy in 1995 by a court of first instance. In addition, during the period of investigation and interrogation before the trial, Asia Bibi had not been granted the right, enshrined in the constitution, of legal assistance: a serious matter, sufficient to invalidate the verdict.
| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

September 16, 2011

What a surprise. In this case the Muslims appear sure that the French will ultimately bend to their will. And why not? They have so many times before. "Muslims defy outdoor prayer ban in France," from Newscore, September 16:

PARIS -- Hundreds of Muslims defied a French ban on outdoor prayer -- which came into force Friday --and took to the streets and sidewalks of Paris to pray.

The French government announced Thursday it was banning praying outside, with officials pledging to enforce the ban from Friday.

But 200 Muslims ignored the ban and prayed on the streets in the neighborhood of La Goutte d'Or, Le Parisien newspaper reported.

French interior minister Claude Gueant said he had nothing against Islam but wanted it out of the public eye because France was a secular state.

He added, "Street prayers must stop because they hurt the feelings of many of our compatriots who are shocked by the occupation of the public space for a religious practice."

Although officials would persuade people to pray in mosques, Muslims who continued to pray in the street would be arrested, Gueant warned.

The ban angered French Muslim leaders who said Muslims only prayed outdoors because of a lack of space in mosques in France....

| 70 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Cases dealing with apostasy in Islam—whereby Muslims who convert to other religions are tortured and executed—are on the rise and need to be acknowledged for what they are: one of Islam’s most visible attempts to suppress the human conscience—a phenomenon that has dire implications beyond religious freedom. Consider these two recent stories. First, from Somalia:

A kidnapped Christian convert from Islam was found decapitated on Sept. 2 ... Juma Nuradin Kamil was forced into a car by three suspected Islamic extremists from the al-Shabaab terrorist group on Aug. 21, area sources said. After members of his community thoroughly combed the area looking for him, at 2 p.m. on Sept. 2 one of them found Kamil’s body dumped on a street. The kidnapping and subsequent manner of murder suggests that al-Shabaab militants had been monitoring him, Christian leaders said. Muslim extremists from al-Shabaab, a militant group with ties to al Qaeda, have vowed to rid Somalia of Christianity.

According to a leader of the underground church: “It is usual for the al-Shabaab to decapitate those they suspect to have embraced the Christian faith, or sympathizers of western ideals. Our brother accepted the Christian faith three years ago and was determined in his faith in God. We greatly miss him.”

Likewise, it was recently revealed that a Muslim father in Uganda trapped, starved, and maimed his teenage daughter, simply because she embraced Christianity—that is, simply because she attempted to follow her conscience. When she was finally rescued six months later, she “was bony, very weak, and not able to talk or walk. Her hair had turned yellow, she had long fingernails and sunken eyes, and she looked very slim, less than 20 kilograms [44 pounds].” Details follow:

Susan and her younger brother, Mbusa Baluku, lived alone with their father after he divorced their mother. In March 2010 an evangelist from Bwera Full Gospel Church spoke at Susan’s school, and she decided to trust Christ for her salvation. “I heard the message of Christ’s great love of him dying for us to get everlasting peace, and there and then I decided to believe in Christ,” she said from her hospital bed. “After a month, news reached my father that I had converted to Christianity, and that was the beginning of my troubles with him. Our father warned us not to attend church or listen to the gospel message. He even threatened us with a sharp knife that he was ready to kill us in broad daylight in case we converted to Christianity.”

When she refused to recant, “he locked her up in a room of the semi-permanent house for six months without seeing sunlight. The younger brother was warned not to tell anyone that Susan was locked up in a room and was not given any food.”

Susan’s brother, still young and not fully indoctrinated in the things of Islam, smuggled scraps of food to his sister, though “most days she could only feed on mud”; he also dug a hole under the door, pouring water through it, which she was forced to lap “using her tongue.”

These two cases are not “aberrant” or “misrepresentative” of Islam. For starters, even if one were to accept that al-Shabaab in Somalia are “extremists,” we find that “the transitional government in Mogadishu fighting [against al-Shabaab] to retain control of the country treats Christians little better than the al-Shabaab extremists do. While proclaiming himself a moderate, President Sheikh Sharif Sheik Ahmed has embraced a version of sharia that mandates the death penalty for those who leave Islam.”

He probably embraced this “version of sharia” as there is no other version: all four recognized schools of Muslim jurisprudence mandate death for apostates. (Meanwhile in Lala land, the New York Times advocates sharia in America.)

As for the Uganda anecdote, Susan’s father actually opted to follow the most lenient form of punishment allowed for apostasy: while Islam’s three Sunni schools of law condemn the apostate to death, the Hanafi School “progressively” advocates beating and imprisoning females until they see the “error of their ways” and return to Islam.

Likewise, though Susan’s father was arrested, he was “quickly released,” doubtless because the authorities recognized that he was only upholding Islam.

Such is the potential fate of all Muslim converts to Christianity wherever Islam is strong. Thus, a Christian pastor in Iran remains behind bars, where he is being tortured and awaits execution for refusing to recant Christianity. Even in onetime Christian Norway, a Muslim convert to Christianity was tortured with boiling water and told by fellow Muslim inmates “If you do not return to Islam, we will kill you”; if deported to his native Afghanistan, he risks death by stoning for leaving Islam (note again the agreement on the penalty for apostasy between individual “fanatics” and Muslim governments).

To all the relativists out there, they have but one question to ask themselves: where is the other religion that kills defectors? There are none; only gangs, not religions, exhibit such a “mafia” mentality—hence the argument that Islam is more a political system than a religion.

Finally, it should be noted that Islam’s suppression of individual choice is not limited to forcing Muslims in far off places to adhere to Islam; rather, the enforced denial of the human conscience in a billion or so people has negative, if unspoken, implications on a global level.

Raymond Ibrahim, an Islam specialist, is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum. He contributes regularly to Jihad Watch.
| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It is well known that the assault on Lara Logan was no isolated incident where sexual harassment and abuse are concerned; nor was it an isolated incident with respect to antisemitic paranoia and hatred directed against foreigners, as Logan herself was assaulted to cries of "Jew! Jew!" Many in the West and in the mainstream media may blame Egyptian antipathy toward the modern State of Israel, disregarding the fact that the roots of that hatred and of Islamic antisemitism trace back 14 centuries to the Qur'an and the words and example of Muhammad himself. Among others:

"Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews..." -- Qur'an 5:82

"Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him." -- Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177

"How I was the subject of anti-Semitic abuse in Cairo," by Thomas Dinham for BBC News, September 15:

Relations between Israel and Egypt have become increasingly strained in recent weeks, and in the Egyptian capital there is a mounting sense of tension, including incidents of anti-Semitism.
Suspicion is a feature of everyday life in Egypt, and a fondness for conspiracy theories is as much a part of the landscape here as the constant traffic jams and their accompanying symphony of blaring car horns.
With the democratic certainties that greeted the immediate aftermath of January's revolution having faded, however, the climate of mistrust and unease about the hard-won gains of the revolution is becoming increasingly palpable.
As disquiet sets in, so does the fear of foul play, backroom deals and, increasingly, malign foreign influences.
I noticed this tendency towards cynicism while enjoying some of the incredible food on offer in Cairo.
The streets here are dotted with makeshift, roadside restaurants where in the mornings you can pick up a veritable feast of quintessential Egyptian dishes that, thanks to a weak Egyptian pound, will only cost you around $0.80 (50p).
As dishes of seasoned aubergine, heavily spiced beans, salad, fermented cheese, chips, tamea [falafel] and gorgeous wholegrain Egyptian bread were laid out before me, I realised I was beginning to attract attention, and not just because of my appetite.
A group of old men slurping tea mixed with incredible quantities of sugar was studying me.
Eventually one of the men struck up a conversation, revolving primarily around what exactly I was doing in Egypt at a time when most foreigners had left.

This atmosphere also helps to explain the detention of various foreigners as "spies" since the revolution.

My answers met with furrowed brows and clearly dissatisfied shakes of the head, when suddenly, raising his hand in front of his mouth in a conspiratorial gesture one man shot, "I bet he's from Israel" into the ear of his friend so quickly as to be barely discernable.
I was shocked. In nearly six months of living in Syria, where orchestrated hysteria about Israel is integral to the very identity of the state, I had never heard the accusation surreptitiously levelled against me.
Neither am I from Israel, nor am I Jewish, but as someone of unmistakably European appearance, I have found myself constantly associated with Israel in Egyptian eyes.
'Conspiracy theorists'
A few days later, while sitting with the same group of men in the cafe, a bridge in a nearby neighbourhood collapsed with an incredible "boom".
State media reported five people killed. My new friends exchanged knowing glances, apparently linking my appearance in the neighbourhood a few days earlier to an otherwise inexplicable calamity nearby.
Israel is just one of a panoply of worries that exercise the conspiracy theorists that frequent Egypt's cafes.
The standard fare of political gossip tends to revolve around the trial of [former President Hosni] Mubarak, internal corruption, and the causes behind the dire economic woes Egypt is currently experiencing.
A prosecuting lawyer at Mr Mubarak's trial even introduced the novel idea that the ex-president had died years ago, and that the man on trial was none other than an impostor. [...]
While walking in the street someone pushed me from behind with such force that I nearly fell over.
Turning around, I found myself surrounded by five men, one of whom tried to punch me in the face. I stopped the attack by pointing out how shameful it was for a Muslim to assault a guest in his country, especially during Ramadan.
Relieved that a seemingly random assault was over, I was appalled by the apology offered by one of my assailants. "Sorry," he said contritely, offering his hand, "we thought you were a Jew."
Shaking his head in disbelief on hearing the news, an Egyptian friend sympathised: "That's stupid, you are obviously not a Jew."
The chilling implication I was left with was that, had I been Jewish, the assault would have apparently been justified.
| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An update on this story. While U.S. operations have been making Swiss cheese of al-Qaeda's operational structure in Pakistan, another threat has been quietly emerging over a broader geographical area. The rise of any of the current "Big 3" jihadist groups in Africa, Boko Haram, al-Shabaab, and al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (or the Apparently-Not-Islamic-Enough Maghreb) is cause for concern, but reports of collaboration between all three groups obviously escalates the threat not only for the African continent, but for its use as a forward operating base for targets across the Mediterranean and beyond.

All of them were once local groups, pursuing supposedly "local" grievances with local "underlying causes," but they have found common cause because they share the same aim: the imposition of Sharia law, which is the goal of jihad in all of its forms. "Terror threat 'very worrying' in Africa: US general," from Agence France-Presse, September 15:

Africa must improve security cooperation in battling extremists or face the prospect of a continent-wide terror network threatening the region and the United States, a top US commander warned Wednesday.
General Carter Ham, head of US African command AFRICOM, said countries in North Africa face increasing threats from terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda affiliates who wish to join forces -- as well as from extremists in Libya who might fan out to other locales, bringing a proliferation of weapons and an exodus of people from the war-torn country.
"Al-Qaeda main may be somewhat diminished, but the affiliates, both acknowledged and those who would like to be affiliated, may be gaining in capacity. And that's what I see in Africa and that's what concerns me," Ham told reporters in Washington.
He said three groups form the greatest threat: the Algeria-based Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), which has claimed numerous terrorist attacks in the region; the militant Shebab operating out of Somalia and East Africa; and Islamist group Boko Haram, blamed for repeated attacks in Nigeria including a bomb blast at UN headquarters in Abuja in August.
"Each of those three independently I think presents a significant threat, not only in the nations in which they primarily operate, but regionally, and I think they present a threat to the United States," Ham said.
The organizations have "very explicitly and publicly" voiced intent to target the West, and while Ham said he questions their capability to do so, "I have no question about their intent to do so."

The four arrested in Sweden last weekend on suspicion of planning a jihadist attack were reported to have connections to al-Shabaab.

He also warned that the groups have expressed intent to "more closely collaborate and synchronize their efforts" in training and operations.
"If left unaddressed, you could have a network that ranges from East Africa, through the center and into the Sahel and Magreb, and I think that would be very, very worrying."
Ham said US cooperation with regional partners was vital, and that while African nations must take the lead, Washington is providing assistance to countries like Mali.
But when pressed on specifics of US operations, including the possible use of military drones over Somalia, Ham was dry on the details.
"I like the fact that Al-Shebab and other extremist leaders in some parts of the world don't know where we are, what we might do, what we are doing, what we're not doing," he said.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

SIOABook.jpg


An illuminating interview about an essential book: at FrontPage this morning, Jamie Glazov interviews Pamela Geller about her new book Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance:

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Pamela Geller, the founder, editor, and publisher of AtlasShrugs.com. She is the executive director of Stop Islamization of America (SIOA), as well as the Freedom Defense Initiative (FDI), and is a regular columnist for the American Thinker, Human Events, and other publications. She is the author of the new book, Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance. She will be speaking at the Wednesday Morning Club, at the Beverly Hills Hotel on 9641 Sunset Blvd, on Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2011 at 11:30 a.m. To make reservations, click here.

FP: Pamela Geller, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Congratulations on your new book.

The title is quite provocative. How come?

Geller: Well, Jamie, the very name evokes a visceral reaction in people — particularly in those hard-wired for delusion. But that is exactly what is happening. My organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative and its Stop Islamization of America program is a human rights entity dedicated to the freedom of speech, which is under attack, as well as to the freedom of religion and to individual rights. These are basic, fundamental principles of the American republic, and they are in danger of being stripped away and seized from us. This book is dedicated to keeping that from happening.

FP: Enlighten us on how an attack on freedom of speech and individual rights is connected to terrorism and Islamization.

Geller: The violent jihad is the most obvious manifestation of jihad. Remember the Fort Hood jihadist, the Times Square car bomber, the Christmas day underwear bomber, the Christmas Tree Lighting bomber in Portland, the Fort Dix Six, and so many others? But the real war on America is also being waged in the universities, the public schools, the courtrooms, the Internet, the workplace, the grocery store, the neighborhoods, and on the airwaves. That is the stealth jihad, the hidden war. And it is to teaching you how to fight that war—where and how and on what grounds—that this book is dedicated.

Islamic supremacists are more assertive in the United States than they ever have been before. They’re building large mega-mosques in communities where the local Muslims can neither fill nor afford them. They’re demanding—and receiving—special privileges for Muslims in workplaces, and special installations for Islamic prayers in public universities, as well as in airports and other public facilities. Islamic law places Muslims in a special class, giving them rights that non-Muslims do not have.

They’re bringing back prayer in public schools—but only for Muslims, while insisting that Christians, Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists can assert no such Constitutional privilege under our law: they are seeking special legal status for Islam. They’re shutting down the national debate that we urgently need to have about Islam and Islamization. They are They’re shutting down the national debate that we urgently need to have about Islam and Islamization. They are demonizing as “bigots,” “racists,” and “Islamophobes” anyone who suggests any anti-terror measure, or who asks the Muslim community in the U.S. to do something effective about the jihadists and Islamic supremacists in their midst. demonizing anyone who suggests any anti-terror measure, or who asks the Muslim community in the U.S. to do something effective about the jihadists and Islamic supremacists in their midst, as “bigots,” “racists,” and “Islamophobes.” (Islamic law considers any critical examination of Islam to be blasphemous and subject to the death penalty.) They’re persecuting anti-jihad activists in the courtroom and private citizens who dare to report suspicious behavior by Muslims.

FP: I think it would be fair to say that most Americans don’t know that any of this is happening. Correct?

Geller: Yes, Jamie. And that’s why the Islamic supremacists are also working as hard as they can to shut down the rapidly growing anti-Sharia movement nationwide, and to prevent any more states from passing anti-Sharia laws like the one 70 percent of Oklahomans voted for in November 2010—only to see the will of the people overruled by a liberal activist judge who maintained, contrary to obvious fact, that Sharia was merely a private religious law, and not the authoritarian political system involving dominance and the subjugation of unbelievers that it really is.

They’re working to muzzle free speech, criminalizing criticism of Islam by means of “hate speech” laws they will manipulate to shut up their opponents and anyone who dares speak out against their Islamization agenda. This is in line with the international war on free speech that is being pursued by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

The Muslim Brotherhood​, a global organization dedicated to the establishment of Islamic political law in all the countries of the world, is also working through its supposedly “moderate” front organizations like the Muslim American Society (MAS) and CAIR, which tries to intimidate Americans (as in the “Flying Imams” case) into being afraid to oppose jihad activity or even report suspicious behavior by Muslims. And these very organizations have infiltrated senior levels of the Department of Defense, the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security​, the Department of Justice, et al, to advance their agendas and make them law.

Muslims are working in the United States now to make sure that Islam dominates, by destroying our Constitutional freedoms.

FP: How do you know that?

Geller: Because they’ve told us, Jamie. The Muslim Brotherhood, according to a captured internal document of that international pro-Sharia organization, is dedicated in America to “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” Omar Ahmad, the cofounder and longtime Board chairman of the nation’s leading “Muslim civil rights group,” the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), also once let the mask slip in a speech he gave to a Muslim audience in California in 1998. Ahmad said, “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran​ should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.” CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper expressed the same desire in a 1993 interview: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.”And one of the leading Muslim spokesmen in the United States, the imam Siraj Wahhaj​, who in 1991 became the first Muslim cleric to give an invocation to the United States Congress, has warned that the U.S. will fall unless it “accepts the Islamic agenda.” He has also said, “If only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.”

I also know that Muslims are working in the United States now to make sure that Islam dominates by destroying our Constitutional freedoms because of the actions of Muslims themselves. Just look at their feverish attempts to restrict free speech and enact hate speech and hate crime laws, their relentless litigation jihad against truth-tellers and fearless patriots, and so much more. When used by Islamic supremacist groups, such phrases as “hate speech” and “hate crime” in reality mean honest discussion of the Islamic supremacist imperative to impose Islamic law over the world. They do not want critics explaining the actual goals of political Islam: they do not want their aggressive aims exposed, and they obfuscate those aims by labeling the truth about them “hate speech.”

FP: So where does this book come in?

Geller: Jamie, every free citizen must join this fight. I wrote this book to show them how. The separation of mosque and state is essential to preserving American freedom and our way of life. Yet the Islamic supremacists have made real inroads. Over the last few years, we have seen the encroachment of Islam on the secular marketplace.

FP: What is the gravest threat that Islamization poses?

Geller: The restriction of the freedom of speech. Under the guise of charges of hate speech leveled against freedom fighters who dare to tell the truth about Islam, the dark shadow of the Sharia looms ever so large. The OIC has labeled the speech of people who speak the truth about Islam, such as Geert Wilders​, a world leader and one of the leading contenders to be the next Prime Minister of the Netherlands (and head of its third-largest party), as “hate speech.” This is an attempt to squelch the truth about the Islamic agenda in the West. In Islamic law, slander doesn’t refer to telling falsehoods about someone, but to saying things that may well be true, but that a person does not want known or spoken of.

As absurd as this is, it has seeped into the public discourse in America and Europe as well. In the West, insulting or defaming Islam is also a societal crime, punishable not by death, but by character assassination. And if they advance Sharia, what they are in effect attempting to advance is an agenda that will result, some day in the future, in making the speaking of truths about Islam that Muslims don’t wish you to know punishable by death.

Read it all. And get the book.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More threats from the would-be caliph. "Erdogan warns Israel: Turkey can send warships to east Mediterranean at any time," from Reuters, September 15 (thanks to Wimpy):

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Thursday Israel could not do whatever it wanted in the eastern Mediterranean and that Turkish warships could be there at any moment.

Erdogan's comments, made during a visit to Tunisia as part of a tour of Arab countries, were the latest in a war of words between the two regional powers, whose relations have deteriorated since Israel killed nine Turks aboard an aid ship headed for Gaza last year.

"Israel cannot do whatever it wants in the eastern Mediterranean. They will see what our decisions will be on this subject. Our navy attack ships can be there at any moment," Erdogan told a news conference shortly after arriving in Tunis....

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Helen Freedman is the executive director of Americans For A Safe Israel (AFSI). AFSI a major political support group for the Jewish communities of Judea, Samaria and the Golan. AFSI supports the right of Israelis, free from outside interference, to live, thrive and expand their communities in all of the Land of Israel.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Michael Paul is a Christian activist from Iraq and advocate for the persecuted Christians there and around the world.

| No Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Joseph Nassralla is a Coptic Christian activist from Egypt. He works for "The Way," the noted California-based Christian satellite TV station.

| No Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

George Demos is an advocate for St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, which stood in the shadow of the World Trade Center Towers. It was destroyed on 9/11 and has been frustrated in its attempts to rebuild by city officials who have done all they could to facilitate the building of the Ground Zero Mosque.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The FBI came under fire again Wednesday from hard-Left journalist Spencer Ackerman in Wired, who has been conducting a campaign for some time to get the bureau to purge its terrorism training seminars of any hint of the truth about the global jihad and Islamic supremacism.

Ackerman reported with breathless self-righteous indignation that “the FBI is teaching its counterterrorism agents that ‘main stream’ [sic] American Muslims are likely to be terrorist sympathizers; that the Prophet Mohammed was a ‘cult leader’; and that the Islamic practice of giving charity is no more than a ‘funding mechanism for combat.’ At the Bureau’s training ground in Quantico, Virginia, agents are shown a chart contending that the more ‘devout’ a Muslim, the more likely he is to be ‘violent.’ Those destructive tendencies cannot be reversed, an FBI instructional presentation adds: ‘Any war against non-believers is justified’ under Muslim law; a ‘moderating process cannot happen if the Koran continues to be regarded as the unalterable word of Allah.’”

Like virtually all Leftist and Islamic supremacist critiques of anti-jihad and anti-terror material, Ackerman’s piece takes for granted that such assertions are false, without bothering to explain how or why. Apparently Ackerman believes that their falsity is so self-evident as to require no demonstration; unfortunately for him, however, no one else has provided any proof of this, either. And there is considerable evidence that what this FBI training material asserts is true.

Are mainstream American Muslims “likely to be terrorist sympathizers”? Certainly all the mainstream Muslim organizations condemn al-Qaeda and 9/11; however, some of the foremost of those organizations, such as the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim American Society, the Islamic Circle of North America, the Muslim Students Association, and the Council of American-Islamic Relations, and others, have links of various kinds to the jihad terrorist group Hamas and its parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, which is dedicated to imposing Islamic law around the world. A mainstream Muslim spokesman in the U.S., the Ground Zero Mosque Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, refused to condemn Hamas until it became too politically damaging for him not to do so; another, CAIR’s Nihad Awad, openly declared his support for Hamas in 1994. Another mainstream Muslim spokesman in this country, Reza Aslan, has praised another jihad terrorist group, Hizballah, and called on the U.S. to negotiate with Hamas. Other mainstream Muslim spokesmen in the U.S. such as Obama’s ambassador to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Rashad Hussain, and media gadfly Hussein Ibish, have praised and defended the confessed leader of another jihad terror group, Palestinian Islamic Jihad: Sami al-Arian.

Do these men and organizations represent a tiny minority of extremists that actually does not express the opinions of the broad mainstream of Muslims in this country? Maybe, but if so, they simply do not have any counterparts of comparable size or influence who have not expressed sympathy for some form of Islamic terror.

Was Muhammad a “cult leader”? Certainly one definition of a cult is that members are not free to opt out if they choose to do so – and it was Muhammad who enunciated Islam’s notorious death penalty for apostasy by saying, ““Whoever changes his Islamic religion, then kill him.” (Bukhari 9.84.57). Also, there are several celebrated incidents in which Muhammad lashed out violently against his opponents, ordering the murder of several people for the crime of making fun of him -- including the poet Abu ‘Afak, who was over one hundred years old, and the poetess ‘Asma bint Marwan. Abu ‘Afak was killed in his sleep, in response to Muhammad’s question, “Who will avenge me on this scoundrel?” Similarly, Muhammad on another occasion cried out, “Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” One of his followers, ‘Umayr ibn ‘Adi, went to her house that night, where he found her sleeping next to her children. The youngest, a nursing babe, was in her arms. But that didn’t stop ‘Umayr from murdering her and the baby as well. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, ‘Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676).

Is the “Islamic practice of giving charity” no more than a “‘funding mechanism for combat’”? If not, one wonders why so many Islamic charities in the United States and around the world have been shut down for funding terrorism, including what was once the largest Islamic charity in the United States, the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), as well as the Global Relief Foundation (GRF), the Benevolence International Foundation (BIF), and many others.

Is it true that “the more ‘devout’ a Muslim, the more likely he is to be ‘violent,’” and is it also true that “moderating process cannot happen if the Koran continues to be regarded as the unalterable word of Allah”? While certainly not all devout Muslims are terrorists, virtually all Islamic terrorists are devout Muslims. In recent years, not only Osama bin Laden but also devout Muslims such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, would-be Times Square bomber Feisal Shahzad, Arkansas jihad murderer Abdulhakim Muhammad, and other jihad terror plotters such as Khalid Aldawsari, Baitullah Mehsud, and Roshonara Choudhry, among many others, reference Islamic teachings to justify violence against unbelievers. Just this week, Detroit underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab declared in court that Muslims should only be judged by the Qur’an.

Can “any war against non-believers” really be “‘justified’ under Muslim law”? Majid Khadduri, an Iraqi scholar of Islamic law of international renown. In his book War and Peace in the Law of Islam, which was published in 1955 and remains one of the most lucid and illuminating works on the subject, Khadduri says this about jihad:

The state which is regarded as the instrument for universalizing a certain religion must perforce be an ever expanding state. The Islamic state, whose principal function was to put God’s law into practice, sought to establish Islam as the dominant reigning ideology over the entire world....The jihad was therefore employed as an instrument for both the universalization of religion and the establishment of an imperial world state. (P. 51)

Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, Assistant Professor on the Faculty of Shari’ah and Law of the International Islamic University in Islamabad. In his 1994 book The Methodology of Ijtihad, he quotes the twelfth century Maliki jurist Ibn Rushd: “Muslim jurists agreed that the purpose of fighting with the People of the Book...is one of two things: it is either their conversion to Islam or the payment of jizyah.” Nyazee concludes: “This leaves no doubt that the primary goal of the Muslim community, in the eyes of its jurists, is to spread the word of Allah through jihad, and the option of poll-tax [jizya] is to be exercised only after subjugation” of non-Muslims.

A Shafi’i manual of Islamic law endorsed by the most prestigious institution in Sunni Islam, Al-Azhar University in Cairo, says that the leader of the Muslims “makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians...until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax,” and cites Qur’an 9:29 in support of this idea: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled.” (‘Umdat al-Salik o9.8)

Are there wars against unbelievers that cannot be justified by Islamic law? Certainly. But there is also a broad mandate for such wars – broad enough to have served as a justification for wars between Muslims and non-Muslims throughout history. During World War I, the crumbling Ottoman Empire even tried to shore up support for its war against the Allies by declaring it a jihad.

In the face of Ackerman’s reports, the FBI is in full retreat. It announced after an earlier report that it had banned use of my book The Truth About Muhammad, which is simply a biography of Muhammad based on the earliest Muslim sources. And this latest report quickly drove the bureau further into Lysenkoism; it quickly announced late Thursday that it was dropping the latest program that Ackerman had zeroed in on as well.

Lysenkoism was ideologically biased junk science regarding biology and agriculture that was adopted as official policy by the Soviet Union under Stalin. The real scientists who told the truth were sent to the gulag.

It is no surprise that in an official environment that refuses to speak about “Islam” and “terrorism” in the same sentence -- a policy which must involve quite a lot of mental and verbal gymnastics when jihad terrorists start quoting Qur’an and other Islamic sources -- that the truth about Islam would come under fire whenever it appears as part of counterterrorism studies. It is no surprise that in an official environment that thinks that the Muslim Brotherhood is “largely secular” and that jihad is a wholly positive interior spiritual struggle would get nervous at revelations that somewhere the truth about Islam and jihad was getting through.

As Lysenkoism grows more entrenched and the FBI’s heads planted more firmly in the sand, Spencer Ackerman’s responsibility for the next jihad attack in the U.S. grows apace.

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

How many more had connections to Pakistan? "NATO says it thwarted broader Taliban attacks," from Agence France-Presse, September 15:

NATO forces thwarted a series of planned attacks in Afghanistan aimed at coinciding with the 9/11 anniversary, the head of international forces said Thursday after a deadly battle in Kabul.

Here's a thought: if jihadists are so obsessed with anniversaries, can they remember their anniversaries for each of their four wives? Just asking.

In the wake of the brazen assault on the Afghan capital which left at least 15 dead, British Army Major General Tim Evans, head of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) Joint Command, said insurgents had planned a much bigger effort.
"We do believe that (Taliban forces) were trying to do an attack on the anniversary of 9/11 and actually we thwarted a number of attacks," he told a teleconference with reporters at the Pentagon.
Evans acknowledged that the dramatic attack was "a spectacular tactical action" but said "it didn't reach any of the government buildings, it didn't achieve any of their aims."
"They did not breach any of the compounds of either the (US) embassy, ISAF, or any of the government buildings," he added.
The assault on the Afghan capital was quelled Wednesday after raging for 19 hours in a hail of rockets, grenades and suicide blasts.
Afghan and foreign troops battled insurgents who targeted the US embassy and NATO headquarters, sowing fear and confusion and raising fresh questions over the Kabul government's ability to secure the country even after a 10-year war.
The standoff ended when troops finally killed the two last insurgents who had held out overnight in a high-rise building under construction just a few hundred meters from the heavily guarded US embassy.
Evans said that the reason the battle lasted so long was that the attackers were contained.
"Once they were contained, there was no point trying to rush that operation," he said. "We did not have any deaths as we cleared the operation... which is a good result."
Evans argued that the battle shows that the Taliban is weakening, while trying to gain visibility with these high-profile attacks.
"We know that the insurgents have changed their tactics to go for spectacular events in order to get media coverage," he said.
"They've lost ground in central Helmand, they've lost ground in Kandahar, and therefore that's why they've had to change their tactics. They haven't got that same initiative that they had before."
He said overall attacks by the Taliban have been declining.
"We expect insurgents will continue to pursue attacks against soft targets" to gain more attention "in an attempt to exaggerate their influence."
The US ambassador to Kabul, Ryan Crocker, blamed the attack on the Haqqani network, a group allied with the Taliban that is considered the most effective insurgent force along Afghanistan's porous eastern border with Pakistan.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No word on whether he qualifies as the umpteenth "No. 3" of al-Qaeda to be neutralized, or if that unlucky number has just been retired.

The standard expressions of indignation from Pakistan are almost certainly forthcoming. "US officials: Al-Qaida ops chief killed by CIA," by Kimberly Dozier for the Associated Press, September 15:

WASHINGTON (AP) — A top al-Qaida operative was killed earlier this week in Pakistan's tribal areas, U.S. and Pakistani officials said Thursday. The death landed another blow against the besieged terrorist network.
The man killed was Abu Hafs al-Shahri, whom two U.S. officials describe as al-Qaida's chief of operations in Pakistan.
Though his name is little known beyond intelligence circles, Al-Shahri is described as dangerous by both the Pakistani and U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe classified counterterrorist operations.
He was apparently killed by a CIA drone strike in Pakistan's lawless tribal areas, though officials would not describe the method since the program is classified. A drone strike was reported by locals on Sunday night.
The officials say al-Shahri worked closely with the Pakistani Taliban to carry out attacks inside Pakistan, and was also a contender to assume some duties of al-Qaida's second in command, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman. Al-Rahman was killed by a CIA drone strike in late August.
U.S. officials believe they can cripple the core al-Qaida organization if they take out the top four or five figures, following the killing in May of al-Qaida chief Osama by Laden by Navy SEALs. Eight of the network's top 20 leaders were killed this year alone, according to the Pentagon's undersecretary for defense intelligence, Michael Vickers, in remarks this week. Vickers predicted that with sustained counterterrorist operations, "within 18-24 months, core al-Qaida's cohesion and operational capabilities could be degraded to the point that the group could fragment and exist mostly as a propaganda arm."
But Vickers and CIA director David Petraeus said al-Qaida's offshoots will remain a serious threat to the U.S.
A Pakistani intelligence official says Pakistani operations chief al-Shahri was a Saudi national, who had lived in the tribal regions of Pakistan, bordering eastern Afghanistan, since 2002.
One of the U.S. officials said the same individual is No. 11 on Saudi Arabia's top-85 most wanted terror suspects, where his full name is listed as Osama Hamoud Gharman Al-Shihri. The official said the same person is No. 68 on Interpol's most wanted list, where his name was spelled "Al-Shehri" and his birthdate was listed as Sept. 17, 1981.
Al-Shahri engaged in liaison mainly with Pakistan's Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan to conduct coordinated attacks against targets inside Pakistan, one of the U.S. officials said. But al-Qaida also inspired the Pakistani Taliban to undertake its first known overseas attack, when a U.S. based operative tried and failed to detonate a car bomb in Times Square last year.
Al-Shahri's killing was first reported by NBC News.
Al-Qaida's senior planner of global terror operations, Adnan Shukrijumah, remains at large.
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Part of "a higher frequency of attacks with a greater intensity of violence in recent months." "Wounded troops shot dead after bomb in Thai south," from Agence France-Presse, September 15:

Five soldiers were killed after suspected insurgents opened fire on those injured in a roadside bombing in Thailand's restive deep south on Thursday, police said. The blast targeted an army truck carrying six troops in Pattani province, one of three provinces in the Muslim-majority deep south where a seven-year rebellion has claimed thousands of lives.
Police said all five of the dead had suffered injuries in the explosion, but had also been shot in the head after apparently being dragged from the wreckage. One soldier remains in a critical condition.
Around 4,800 people have been killed in near-daily attacks since shadowy rebels launched an uprising in early 2004, according to the latest figures from Deep South Watch, an independent research group that monitors the conflict.
The organisation has said it has seen a higher frequency of attacks with a greater intensity of violence in recent months, with authorities and both Buddhist and Muslim civilians targeted.
Also on Thursday, police in the neighbouring province of Narathiwat said suspected militants had bombed and set fire to an empty, brand-new police station, just two weeks before it was due to open. No one was believed to have been hurt in the attack.
Explosives planted in a cooking-gas tank were detonated on the ground floor and a fire was lit, damaging walls and stairs, but police said they had not yet moved any furniture into the station, which was due to open on October 1.
"An attack on an unmanned station has never happened before," said police colonel Apirak Sangkhao.
Police will now have to check whether the structure is safe before they move into the building.
The Thai government on Tuesday extended emergency rule in the region, which borders Malaysia.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

September 15, 2011

I tried to tell you. "Egyptian PM: Peace deal with Israel not sacred," from Reuters, September 15 (thanks to David):

CAIRO - Egypt's Prime Minister Essam Sharaf said a peace deal with Israel was not "sacred" and could be changed for the benefit of peace or the region.

His comments, made in an interview with a Turkish television channel and broadcast on state television, were the strongest yet by the new government which took over after president Hosni Mubarak was overthrown in February.

"The Camp David agreement is not a sacred thing and is always open to discussion with what would benefit the region and the case of fair peace ... and we could make a change if needed," he said in the interview.

Politics professor Mustapha al-Sayyid said Sharaf's comments appeared to be aimed more at boosting Egyptian security on the border with Israel, which under the 1979 treaty is subject to limitations, rather than abrogating it altogether.

"It has been well demonstrated that the size of Egyptian forces in this area is not sufficient to meet threats to security. The number of troops should be increased and equipment improved," he said.

"I don't think any Egyptian political forces are calling for abrogation of the treaty or even ending diplomatic relations."

Tensions between Egypt and Israel, which have been rising since Mubarak was overthrown, flared after a cross-border attack last month.

Cairo accused Israeli forces of shooting dead five Egyptian security guards during gun battles with Palestinian militants who Israel says had earlier ambushed and killed eight Israelis.

Egyptian protesters stormed the Israeli embassy last Friday in anger at Israel for the border killings. [...]

"I think what is happening is that both Egypt and Israel are committed to regional peace. They are anxious to move past the incidents of the past weekend and restore the relationship," US Ambassador to Cairo Anne Patterson told a business forum on Thursday.

More wishful thinking.

| 41 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It doesn't really matter if he was an al-Qaeda operative or not. There are many jihadists who are not al-Qaeda. But it is good to see this judge not folding to the courtroom jihad being waged by Abdulmutallab's defense team. "Judge: Underwear bomber's statements about being al-Qaida operative admissible," by David Ashenfelter and Tresa Baldas for the Detroit Free Press, September 15 (thanks to Block Ness):

A federal judge today refused to throw out incriminating statements a 24-year-old Nigerian student made to federal agents shortly after he allegedly tried to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day 2009.

U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds concluded that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab wasn’t under the influence of the painkiller fentanyl when he told agents he was an al-Qaida operative who was trying to blow up the plane....

More than 300 people were aboard the Amsterdam to Detroit flight when Abdulmutallab allegedly ignited explosives concealed in his underwear....

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The fact that Muslims do not like Jews and Israel, I know, because many of my correspondents, Islamic leaders, Emirs, the heads of armed groups and ordinary Mujahideen talked about this at every meeting and every interview with me.

The fact that Islam is a nation and that Muslims have no other nationality is what I also heard from religious leaders supporting the Jihad.

The fact that Muslims can adapt and play by the political process more than once I saw myself.

They know how to do represent themselves as the victims of inhumane aggression through the media. And the same information is transmitted to the Islamic world in a different manner -- as a victory for Jihad and death for the sake of Allah.

That they want to create a unified Islamic state, the Caliphate, is also no secret. They spoke about it openly in their sermons, and it is in their scriptures.

But as Muslims manage to sell the idea of ​​a Caliphate (a single Islamic State) and the Sharia (Islamic law), they do not have the support of the leaders of Muslim countries. To enlist the support of some political movements and leaders, they are capable of anything.

That's what I learned from a man who was engaged in the foreign policy of the Chechen leadership, and was very close to the Khoja Ahmed Nukhayev. I wrote about Nukhayev earlier at Jihad Watch.

Nukhayev first worked in the Soviet Union to make money and establish contacts in Europe. He bought in foreign embassies expensive and beautiful scarves that Chechen women wear like a headband after their marriage. He did this to establish good relations with foreign diplomats who worked in the USSR.

This man and many others have argued that Islamic Sharia law is beneficial for Europe. The growing Muslim population in Europe is an issue for these countries, and Nukhayev, as one of the leaders with access to the Western elite, voiced the idea of ​​creating a single Islamic political movement for all Muslims, and creating a single Islamic state.

The idea was that unchecked Islamic force must return to its roots. Leaders of the Jihad pressed for certain concessions, promising that the Jinn would return to the lamp. Otherwise, Islam and the Mujahideen would be an uncontrollable force.

Well-known journalists in the Chechen Republic's press department, which was headed by M. Udugov, applauded the creation of the only Islamic party in the Caucasus, "Islamic Order." This organization is the same in structure and purpose as the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Once I met with their delegation (their political and military experts); they spoke French and English. I talked through an interpreter. They knew my negative attitude towards Wahhabism, and argued that Muslims in the Caucasus must be united under Sharia law, because otherwise it would not be possible to control them.

Perhaps these experts would advise the West to negotiate with Al Qaeda, send modern radars to Turkey, and recognize Palestine within the 1967 borders. For regarding the Muslims in the Caucasus, they are just as sadly mistaken. For the only reason to negotiate with jihadists is to buy time; their ultimate goal is not simply the taming of disobedient Muslims. It is to establish the objectives of Islam. Otherwise they would lose the meaning of jihad.

Negotiation with anyone in the Islamic movement, involving talks and recognition of their power in order to maintain a balance, can never bring the desired result. The Muslims have a goal upon which they can unite: the spread of Sharia law, as well as the liberation of Jerusalem from the Jews. For this purpose are all one: the Shiites and Sunnis, and all others who read the Koran and believe in Allah and his prophet.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

James Lafferty is the leader of the Virginia Anti-Sharia Taskforce (VAST). The mission of the Virginia Anti-Shariah Task Force is to oppose and assist others in resisting the implementation of the radical, barbaric and anti-Constitutional Shariah law in Virginia or anywhere in America.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Darla Dawald is the National Director of the Patriot Action Network, the nation's largest conservative social action network, serving hundreds of thousands of citizens every month.

| No Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Anders Gravers, from Denmark, is an activist and politician who is the leader of Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE), Europe's leading coalition resisting jihad and Islamization.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It is no accident or coincidence that Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. A manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that "retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right." However, "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2). In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law.

Syria in 2009 scrapped a law limiting the length of sentences for honor killings, but "the new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour 'provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.'" And in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that "Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values."

Nonetheless, the media drumbeat is constant: honor killings have nothing to do with Islam. And as long as that continues, we will see more and more murders like this one.

This one also manifests the contempt and hatred Muslims have for the "People of the Book" their Western spokesmen profess to respect: the girl had supposedly besmirched the family honor by dallying with a...Christian.

"Girl strangled to death in name of honour," from the Daily Times, September 15 (thanks to Block Ness):

LAHORE: A 15-year-old girl was allegedly strangled to death by her uncle in the name of honour in Shera Kot Police limits on Wednesday.

The deceased was identified as Anam, daughter of Ramzan, resident of Ghousia Park. Police said that the deceased’s uncle, Talib Hussain, who was residing at his brother-in-law’s house, suspected that Anam had illicit relations with a Christian youth of the same area.

On the day of incident, Talib entered the house and strangled Anam to death and managed to escape from the crime scene. She was taken to a local hospital where the doctors pronounced her dead. Police, after being informed, reached the spot and shifted the dead body to a city morgue. Police registered a case against the accused on the complaint of deceased’s father, Ramzan....

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Muslims are forbidden under Sharia to convert to another religion, on pain of death. Members of other religions are forbidden under Sharia to proselytize among Muslims. So there is nothing surprising or unusual about the mob's behavior in this instance. What is surprising and unusual is the continued Western indifference to and denial of the manifest fact of the death penalty for apostasy and attendant human rights abuses in Muslim countries. Islamic Tolerance Alert from modern, moderate Indonesia: "Accused or proselytising, American family attacked by Indonesian extremists," by Mathias Hariyadi for Asia News, September 15 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

Jakarta (AsiaNews) – Only the intervention of police saved the lives of an American family that was attacked by an enraged mob spurred by a local religious leader. Muslim fundamentalists were incensed by charges that the head of the family was engaged in proselytising in the predominantly Muslim area. The latest of its kind (a few days ago clashes between Christians and Muslims left people dead and wounded in Maluku, this incident is further proof of Indonesia’s steady slide towards extremism, a situation that threatens the country’s constitutional foundation, namely its pluralism.

The attack came at night on 5 September in an area west of Palu, provincial capital of South Sulawesi. An American family, David Ray Graeff, 41, his wife Georgia, also 41, and their two sons Benjamin and Daniel, had been staying at Bukit Kabonena Permai housing compound for the previous two weeks. Mr Graeff had been hire to teach English language and literature at a local Protestant divinity school in the village of Uwera, Sigi District.

On that night, an extremist mob, spurred by a local Muslim leader, Muhammad Saleh bin Abubakar Alaydrus, from the local Nurul Khairaat praying group, attacked the family, accusing them of proselytising in the mostly Muslim area. For them, the presence of Americans was itself a “serious threat”.

In the course of their attack, the mob set fire to the family’s property, including a minivan.

Police, who had already been deployed in the area to pre-empt acts of violence, was able to intervene and prevent the worse.

However, the family had to be moved to avoid possible deaths and injuries, Southeast Sulawesi Deputy Police Chief Senior Superintendent Ari Dono Sukmanto said....

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

REVIEW OF
PAUL B. FENTON and DAVID G. LITTMAN
L’EXIL AU MAGHREB. LA CONDITION JUIVE SOUS L’ISLAM 1148-1912.
PUPS [PRESSES DE L’UNIVERSITÉ PARIS-SORBONNE] PARIS, 2010.
792pp. Illustrated [Black and White Photos and Color Plates]. Maps. List of Illustrations. Bibliography. Glossary [of Hebrew and Arabic Terms], Index of Names, Index of Places, Analytical Table of Contents. [In French]
by Ibn Warraq

Abraham Ibn Ezra, Hebrew scholar and polymath, left Andalusia in 1140 C.E., just before the invasion of the Almohads, a particularly violent and bigoted Islamic dynasty of North Africa and Spain [reigned 1130-1269], which destroyed so many Jewish communities and towns. He wrote a lament on this destruction of North African and Hispanic settlements:

“I weep like an ostrich for Lucena [cf. Lam.4:3 and Mic. 1:8].
Her remnant dwelt innocent and secure…
Alas, the city of Cordoba is forsaken, her ruin as vast as the sea!
Her sages and learned men perished from hunger and thirst.
Not a single Jew was left in Jaen or Almeria;
Majorca and Málaga struggle to survive…
I cry out like a woman in labor for the congregation of Sjilmasa—
A city where genius and wisdom flourished; their brilliance obscured the darkness….
Woe, the congregation of Fez is no more; this day they are given to the plunderer;
Where is the protection for the congregation of Tlemsan?
Its glory is melted away.
A bitter voice I raise over the fate of Ceuta and Meknes;
I rend my garments for Dar‘ī already vanquished…"[1]

Ibn Ezra’s elegy serves as a sad but fitting motto to Paul Fenton and David Littman’s scholarly and indispensable survey of the plight of Jews in North West Africa [Maghreb] under Islam between 1148-1912. No two scholars could be better qualified than Fenton and Littman for such an immense task. Paul Fenton is Assistant Director of the Department of Arabic and Hebrew Studies at the University of Paris-Sorbonne, where he is also Professor of Hebrew Language and Literature. He is a world authority on Jewish Civilization under Islam, and author of Moïse ibn Ezra, philosophe et poète andalou du XIIeme siècle (1997); and Juda ibn Malka. La Consolation de l’expatrié spirituel.

David Littman, with a B.A. and an M.A. degree in Modern History and Political Science from Trinity College, Dublin, began his research on this subject in 1970, first in the archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Ministère des Affaires Étrangères Français), more informally known as le Quai d’Orsay, and secondly, in the extraordinary archives of The Alliance Israélite Universelle [AIU]; a Paris-based international Jewish organization created in 1860 by the French statesman Adolphe Crémieux to defend the human rights of Jews around the world; it promotes the ideals of Jewish self-defense and self-sufficiency. The motto of the organization is Kol yisrael arevim zeh bazeh -- "All Jews bear responsibility for one another." The AIU wished to advance the Jews of the Middle East through education and culture, and to that end established schools, so that by 1900 it was running 100 schools with a combined student population of 26,000. The bulk of the schools were in Morocco, Tunisia and Turkey. [2]

Nor did David Littman forget the archives of the Foreign Office in London, U.K. Littman has published numerous articles on the Jews of North West Africa and the Orient. Of particular relevance is Littman’s pioneering monograph on Sir Moses Montefiore’s mission to Morocco between 1863-1864, which appeared in 1985 in a volume commemorating the centenary of Sir Moses. Since 1986, he has dedicated himself to defending Human Rights at the United Nations in Geneva in his capacity as representative of several non-governmental organisations.

The book is dedicated to the memory of Hayyim Zeev Hirschberg [1903-1976], the eminent historian of North West African Judaism. Littman began a collaboration with Hirschberg in the 1970s which was unfortunately cut short by the latter’s premature death in 1976. Nonetheless, Hirschberg instilled in Littman the importance of the archives of the AIU which were to provide irrefutable proof of the abject condition of the Jews in the Maghreb in the Nineteenth Century, destroying along the way a number of myths that were current up to that time.

This work will surely become the definitive source book on its subject -- supplemented perhaps with some details, but unlikely ever to be completely superseded. All further research on North African Jewry surely must begin here. It is organized along principles established by such scholars as Jacob Landau in his Jews in Nineteenth-Century Egypt [1969], and Bat Ye’or in her Le Dhimmi: Profil de l’opprimé en Orient et en Afrique du Nord [1980]; that is to say, each work begins with an historical introduction that summarises and surveys the entire period in question. It is then followed by the original documents from the various archives. While Jacob Landau is content to provide the documents in their original languages (Hebrew, Arabic, Italian, and French), Fenton and Littman (and for that matter Bat Ye’or) have translated all the documents into French, have carefully noted and annotated each source. In a series of scholarly footnotes each contributor – traveller, historian, diplomat, poet -- is identified, and his biographical details, which are quite substantial in some cases, are given. Obscure terms, and characters that flit through the extracts are explained, and brought to light. The book is a pleasure to handle physically -- a feast for the intellect as well as the eyes, and other senses since it is printed on glossy paper (accounting for the book’s weight of over three pounds). It is illustrated with ten colour plates of paintings by Delacroix, Alfred Dehodencq, Du Nouÿ, and others, and sixty three black and white pictures of places, events, and copies of documents.

The source material is divided geographically, (North West Africa generally, then Algeria and Morocco) and into two parts. First, we have the historical and literary sources [part A,of which there are 135 extracts], and then the truly archival material [Part B, of which there are 185 extracts]. The greatest amount of material comes from the nineteenth century, though we have startling eyewitness accounts from the twelfth century onwards. Unlike Algeria, we possess many contemporary Jewish accounts of their situation under Islam in Morocco, particularly from the 1850s onwards. It is unfortunately a story of pillage, the torching of synagogues, the burning of Hebrew sacred texts, the rape and abduction of Jewish women and murders.

To give an example, I shall quote from the original eighteenth century English source that is translated into French in Fenton and Littman’s book:

“It has been observed in squabbles among them, or when a poor Man falls out with his ass, that the first name is carran (i.e.) cuckold, then he calls him son of a Jew…." [p.45]

“In the middle of the City live the Jews, having a Place to themselves, the Gates of which are locked at Night, which Privilege they also have in most of the Cities of this Emperor's Dominions. They have an Alcayde to guard their Gates, and protect them against the Common-People, who otherwise would plunder them; for they live in great Subjection, it being Death for them to curse, or lift up a Hand against the meanest Moor, so that the Boys kick them about at their Pleasure, against which they have no other Remedy but to run away, away, they are obliged to pull off their Shoes whenever they pass by a Mosque, and to wear black Cloaths and Caps; nor are they allowed the use of Horses; for Ben Hattar himself (tho' he had Power over Life and Death) was always forced to ride a Mule…” [p.185]

The source is John H. Windus, A Journey to Mequinez, the Residence of the Present Emperor of Fez and Morocco, On the Occasion of Commodore Stewart’s Embassy thither for the Redemption of the British Captives in the Year 1721. London, Jacob Tonson, 1725. Fenton and Littman’s footnote explains that Ben Hattar [died 1724] was a Jewish merchant from Meknès, often employed by the Emperor Mawlay Isma‘il as financial advisor in his diplomatic negotiations. In 1721, he negotiated, notably, a commercial treaty with the British Commodore Stewart.

A further footnote tells us all that we would wish to know about John H.Windus. The latter [fl. 1725] was a historian who accompanied Commodore Charles Stewart, who had been sent to negotiate the release of three hundred English captives. Windus gathered much material on the country in the four months he spent there. Windus’ account was the second ever published in English on Morocco (after that of Addison). His book went through several editions and generated a great deal of interest, particularly Windus’s recitation of the daily life in the Moroccan countryside.

Even a cursory glance at the analytical table of contents gives a grim picture of the situation of Jews in the Maghreb. Confining ourselves to Nineteenth Century Morocco, here is a rapid tour d’horizon:

SUFFERANCE IN ISOLATION (1800-1860)

A 70: The inequality of Jews in front of the Law (Fez, c.1800)
A 71: The Jews of Morocco live in a state of slavery of the most horrible kind. (1803)
A.72: The Sultan exempts a Jewish interpreter from wearing distinctive clothing. (Marrakech. c.1806)
A.73: Jews cannot leave Morocco without imperial authorisation. (1808)
A.74: The payment of Jizya described by an American navigator. (Mogador, 1815)
A.75: Constraint imposed on Jews (c.1820)
A.76: The sack of the Jewish Quarter of Fez as seen by a Muslim chronicler (1820)

Now some examples from the archives:

THE RISE IN PERSECUTION OF THE JEWS OF THE MAGHREB, AND THE HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION OF EUROPEAN JEWS (1863-1864).

B.3 Persecutions at Chechaouan (1864)
B.4 Persecutions of Jews of Demnate (1864)
B.5 The persecutions continue despite the protection of France (1864)
B.6. Disastrous consequences of the events of Safi (1864)
B.7 In the footsteps of Moses Montefiore.

I hope I have been able to give an idea of the riches of material gathered in this remarkable collection. I trust that eventually an English translation will appear, since the contents deserve the widest possible dissemination.

FOOTNOTES

[1] Abraham Ibn Ezra : Twilight of a Golden Age: Selected Poems of Abraham Ibn Ezra, edited and translated by Leon J. Weinberger. Tuscaloosa (Alabama): University of Alabama Press, 1997, pp.3-.4

[2] Notes from the excellent article from Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_Israélite_Universelle

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Ellison accepted $13,350 from the Muslim American Society to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca.

And what is the Muslim American Society? The Muslim Brotherhood. "In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation's major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members." -- Chicago Tribune, 2004, via the Muslim Brotherhood's English-language website, Ikhwanweb.

Wajahat Ali was one of the five authors of the hard-Left Soros-funded Center for American Progress's attack piece "Fear, Inc." Ali has revealed in this video that he was a Board member of the Muslim Students Association. The Muslim Students Association was established by members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Center for American Progress needs to come clean about its ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

"Congressman Promotes Fear Inc. ‘Islamophobia’ Event," by Ryan Mauro for FrontPageMagazine, September 12:

The office of Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), the first elected Muslim congressman, is promoting an event in Congress on September 13 to publicize the Center for American Progress’ report, “Fear Inc: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America.” [...]

“The report identifies the funding streams that support anti-Muslim activities, the intellectual nexus of the Islamophobia network, the grassroots players and organizations that help spread messages of hate, the media amplifiers of Islamophobia, and the elected officials who support anti-Muslim causes,” said an e-mailed statement from Rep. Ellison.

Rep. Ellison has repeatedly worked with Muslim Brotherhood fronts like the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Islamic Society of North America, both of which were labeled as “unindicted co-conspirators” in the Holy Land Foundation trial. A judge ruled in 2009 that the federal government had “ample evidence” to connect them to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. His 2008 pilgrimage to Mecca was sponsored by the Muslim American Society, another Brotherhood affiliate. He has also received donations from major players in the Brotherhood’s American networks. He defends CAIR, and lashes out against those who talk about the ideological roots of the Islamist threat...

The “Fear Inc.” report has been extensively rebutted here at FrontPage Magazine. It was published by the Center for American Progress, a left-wing think-tank led by John Podesta, the former chief-of-staff for President Clinton, with an annual budget of at least $25 million, and possibly as high as $38 million. It took part in the creation of Media Matters for America, a non-profit that seeks to counter perceived right-wing bias in the media....

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us



Islamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureGround Zero Mosque documentary filmMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and Islam
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House in 2012.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



The Truth About Muhammad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


facebook islam


Follow me on Twitter



Monthly Archives

Wikio — Top Blogs — Politics
Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


2010 Jihad Watch AwardsSIOAFreedom Defense Initiative
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» Alyssa A. Lappen
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Armenian Genocide
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Chesler Chronicles
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Divest Terror.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Events
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» Jihadica
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» The Lid
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Muhammad Tube
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» Need to Know Show
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Phyllis Chesler
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» Right Wing News
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» summer patriot, winter soldier
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» World Threats
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Support Geert WildersFITNAAmina and Sarah SaidIslam: What the West Needs to KnowThe incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator!Jihad Watch VideosFreedom CenterStand for Free SpeechFree LebanonSderot Media CenterThousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11Oriana Fallaci Paul WeyrichTashbih SayyedDominiciGoogle Gadget